Comments by "Nicolae Crefelean" (@kneekoo) on "Elon Musk Colluded With Trump Campaign To Suppress Damaging Reports" video.

  1. I was curious about that dossier, so I went to Ken Klippenstein's website. On his article about his X reinstatement, here's what he said: Yes, I know that it is general practice to delete “private” information from leaks and classified documents, but in this case, not only is Vance an elected official and Vice Presidential candidate, but the information is readily available for anyone to buy. [...] We should be honest about so-called private information contained in the dossier and "private" information in general. It is readily available to anyone who can buy it. [...] Did I make a mistake in not redacting the “private” information on J.D. Vance? If I wanted a Twitter account, apparently so. But on principle? I stand by it absolutely. The document he published (indirectly, as a link on X) had indeed private information, and he obviously didn't have JD's permission. It makes no difference that some people who know where to get it from can pay for it. It's not the others who published private info. So whoever reported his X post wasn't wrong. It's one thing to say that someone has a certain laptop with certain stuff on it, and it's another to share private information. He made a bad call, and got suspended. That's the actual story.
    1