General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Fox News
comments

Comments by "" (@michaelhill8441) on "If Jan 6 Committee has 'done anything,' it's 'exonerated' President Trump: GOP lawmaker" video.

No, it's him.
14
You can't vote from overseas
13
No, they covered those in the hearings
13
@distanceismyplastercast that was after they were told not to erase them. My guess is there is someone still there loyal to trump
11
Can you show a shred of proof?
10
It is highlighting our weaknesses around elections that's forsure
10
@devastating6143 thank God there are still some Republicans that can actually see the truth.
10
@Danny-jb6pg how is oversight and transparency a waste? Especially when he tried to overthrow the government.
9
Umm no, he sent a mob to interrupt an official proceeding. That's illegal
7
@callikohl5698 if you had watched you probably would agree
7
@def-po8tu nope, trump
6
Say you're dumb without saying you're dumb.
6
@DowntherabbitholewithD you guys screamed about Hillary for 10 years ffs. 8 years worth of hearings too.
5
@Ratz Patootie I wouldn't be surprised if fox blames her
4
Not watching is un-American. Even if you don't agree it's incumbent of every citizen to hear the facts.
4
@Madminute1968 well, to disagree with treason being bad is pretty dumb, no?
4
@sorayaalcontin3613 8 trillion in debt. Most by any potus ever in 4 years. That extra debt load weighed down our finances and is one of the causes of inflation.
3
If you're in a red county it's not your money
3
@calipeach4131 yes
3
He won't be. Can't run once you are a prisoner
3
@fresyo1540 too big of words used?
3
@devastating6143 I do, probably because I'm an independent too. I can be critical of Biden but I choose to do that with like minded people who can be objective. You are the Republicans I grew up with and miss these days. I don't mind ideological differences but when facts are being lied about every day, I draw a line.
3
@TheFirstPotato what citizens actually contribute to that tax base. I will answer for you, blue counties do. By a huge margin too
3
@bonnieweidman1002 "No congressional official, or body, has the authority to activate the National Guard to the U.S. Capitol. Only the president," added Jane. L Campbell, president and CEO of the U.S. Capitol Historical Society. "If the president calls the National Guard to the U.S. Capitol, no congressional official has the authority to decline its service."
3
@TheDiamond2009 I don't get it. Democrats want to tax the hell out of the elites but your party blocks it. Democrats bring ideas to combat gun crime but you block it. When do you take responsibility for blocking all attempts at fixing our problems?
3
@jamesbrice6619 his best economy cost us 8 trillion dollars. Anyone is doing great when they go hog wild on the credit card.
3
@donf3877 it was corroborated last night.
2
@lebowskiunderachiever3591 that's about it too
2
@mikedugger669 Jan 6
2
@DowntherabbitholewithD $150 a week? Sounds like you made bad choices in life. That's on you
2
@DowntherabbitholewithD like I said. Bad choices.
2
@TheFirstPotato dude, you quoted the amendment after I said the info you need is in the federalist papers. Man I'm starting to regret talking to you.
2
@DowntherabbitholewithD that's odd because democrats are the ones who actually care about others. Listen, it was your choice to manipulate a 400 pound woman on your own. It was your choice to go into that career knowing there would be heavy lifting that you wernt capable of. These were YOUR choices so don't sit here and complain about your choices now that you've realized they were poor choices.
2
@frostycools1315 patriots.
2
The Steve bannon audio where he admitted the coup was pretty damning
2
@dr.burtgummerfan439 if you had watched you would have seen all the evidence. You didn't watch so that's why you didn't see it.
2
@donf3877 are you denying bannons audio proved it?
1
1300 comments on a 2 hour old story. Tons of Russian trolls woking for trump today
1
@eyesee2339 sure thing kid
1
@jimpollard113 I hope you do. They have caught the handful of Republicans that tried that in 2020. So I bet they will get you in 2024.
1
@braddouglas7839 prove that's ever happened.
1
@derekbaker777 this guys isn't a soldier. He is a Russian troll
1
@ramblinwreck384 the 2000 mules is not only fa tually incorrect but not even plausible as it would have needed 100,000 people to pull off and you can't coordinate that many and keep it a secret. The movie relied on coincidental data that they extrapolated a swers from without any proof that's what happened. Their proof was people moved between two places. Alot of people do that. That's not proof, that's speculation
1
@derekbaker777 why can't I? I've been called a groomer on here dozens of times without them having proof. I'd say that's a far worse thing to call someone without proof no? So you want different rules for your team? Is that what you're getting at
1
@derekbaker777 also, you hold me to a higher regard than you do trump seeing as there isn't a shred of proof the election was stolen. Why? I mean trump lies regularly yet you have higher expectations out of me. Yet I have absolutely no power in the government.
1
Lisa Garrison umm no. That's not how America works. Unless your crime is really heinous or you're a flight risk, you generally are offered bail. Good job fighting against your own rights though.
1
@sadiecox3530 Democrat money you mean. 70% of it comes from democrats voting counties and all
1
@ursirius4878 exactly. The panel was designed to highlight the problematic Republicans that are destroying America.
1
Their families said they were distraught by the way the event was being ignored and lied about by Republicans and right wing news.
1
@nealsantiago1093 you only contribute to 30% of the nation's finance. My post stands
1
@TheFirstPotato sorry if you don't like facts but those are the facts around the second. It's not my fault you believe lies.
1
@TheFirstPotato well, in order to understand the second first you need to know why they wrote it, with the rational in the federalist papers. Also, the personal writings of the founding fathers. To sy you understand the second without doing all the reading is usually where people go wrong.
1
@jacdaniels8226 I noticed all your posts don't show up. You must be a troll
1
@TheFirstPotato please quote where in the 2nd it says arms are to be held to prevent a tyrannical government. Go ahead
1
@TheFirstPotato you have most definitely not read the federalist papers with that explanation. Also, you haven't told me where it says to stop a tyrannical government
1
@TheFirstPotato also, are you trying to say the federalist papers don't matter because of the timing of the constituion being adopted?
1
@TheFirstPotato you haven't given me a single shred of evidence the standing army point was moot. You just stated it was which isn't proof. I want you to quote where that was written and a citation so I can read it. Come on now. Also, just because Republicans keep telling themselves the second was to combat tyranny doesn't mean it was ever written ANYWHERE.
1
@TheFirstPotato please show when and where in the last 250 years any president used the standing army against the people?
1
@TheFirstPotato not a single amendment we have is broad. None of them. They all have very specific rules around them fashioned by hundreds of years of litigation. There are no broad rights when they all have exceptions. You have a very juvenile understanding of our constitution.
1
@TheFirstPotato your last post makes no sense.
1
@DowntherabbitholewithD you are a classic Trumper. Blame everyone for your problems but yourself then complain the government handout you get isn't enough. Man is that ever weak
1
@TheFirstPotato you make it sound like it's in a vacuumed and all on its own. Not like there have been countless legal cases that shaped those broad words. Tell me this, how long does it take to buy a tank?
1
@TheFirstPotato what the 150 a week from? Disability which is essentially a handout. Am I supposed to cry a river over her bad choices in life?
1
@TheFirstPotato no, it made no sense. Try rewording it into something an English reader would recognize
1
@DowntherabbitholewithD I'm sure youre bigger seeing as you sit around all day. Good luck to you and remember this, you are a product of the choices you make in life. Want a better life, make better choices. No one is stopping you from re educating yourself to get out of your predicament. Only laziness does that
1
@TheFirstPotato dude, it's you who doesn't understand. You have yet to quote anything that refutes my premis that the 2nd was because we had no standing army. When did we get an army? Can you at least answer that.
1
@TheFirstPotato that's not true. How can you say that when we never wanted one until after the war of 1812. What did you think the founders were relying on for our protection before that?
1
@TheFirstPotato who says they don't correlate? You? I didn't aquire this information from my imagination. I have studied the constitution and wrote a paper in university on the federalist papers. Have you ever maybe thought you are wrong? Have you ever entertained the idea that you've been lied to? Probably not hey?
1
@TheFirstPotato I know. My point was it wasn't in the constitution.
1
@TheFirstPotato why would I hold you being a woman against you? You really seem far too smart to make baseless assumptions about me. The US military is not weak. Far from it. Just you saying that makes me think you're not taking the conversation very seriously
1
@Toca_forlife31 worst part is no one here seems to care about that. Tragic is a good word for it.
1
@TheFirstPotato for now I'm ignoring g you because I don't have the time to give a proper answer. I will get back to you later tonight.
1
@philspd473 he may have been elected because of that but he lost to biden because he was the fourth worst we ever had. According to the experts anyways
1
@lukehansen5331 he can't help himself
1
@TheFirstPotato true but it doesn't take three hours to give the order.
1
@TheFirstPotato no he did not have 10's of thousands of troops stationed anywhere. You are full of misinformation regarding that day. That's why you should go back and watch the hearings.
1
Craig Brown completely un American as you will go on to say how innocent trump is after being too lazy to watch for yourself. You're weakening the country by doing this.
1
This isn't a trial. It's more a fact finding committee that will recommend charges in the end.
1
@kateofone there were. Many. 11,000 people either went to jail.or were fined from those protests. Google is your friend
1
@kateofone lol sorry
1
@im2tweaked that's has not you fool.
1
@smelltheglove1726 they really don't. Their understanding of American government is extremely poor and they don't care to learn.
1
@anaibarangan4908 same guy that trashed the economy and helped add 8 trillion to our debt? Same guy that designed a tax bill that targeted the homes of middle class democrats? He is garbage
1
Each hearing revealed information on that day. Last night's hearing went over how trump incited the riot and then spent three hours fighting his staff to tell them to stop. Biggest revelation from last night was the audio of bannon admitting it all
1
@Madminute1968 nope, just someone who can see when a person's oath of office is broken. Plain and simple, it's wrong to coordinate an attack on the American government. If you cant get behind that then you're a traitor too
1
@TheFirstPotato hey potato, why didn't you answer my comment about who pays for what in America. I gave you citations and everything. You leave me thinking you would rather put your head in the sand.
1
@Madminute1968 I couldn't care less what you have done. I'm more concerned with what you're currently doing. Also, I said if you can't get behind not attacking the American government, than you are.
1
@TheFirstPotato ya I'm not surprised you tube is doing that. I was telling g you about the difference between red and blue counties and the amount they pay in taxes.
1
@TheDiamond2009 FYI no, we are after him.
1
@sorayaalcontin3613 nope, pointing out the obvious is
1
@fredataylor8936 it doesn't matter if she was. She was breaking through the house chamber window where politicians were being guarded.
1
I'd say the audio of bannon admitting they would just declare they won regardless the outcome was a smoking gun.
1