Comments by "" (@michaelhill8441) on "Concha: Supreme Court leaker did this to 'mobilize liberals'" video.

  1. Distraction? It's a major story that just happened.
    5
  2.  @josephjohnson3738  you do know this just ended Republicans in the midterms right?
    5
  3. This just killed Republicans with independents.
    4
  4.  @dennisg4053  not when a right is being stripped away. The country already thought the way mitch stacked the court was dirty. Now with this they just gave a huge swell of support for court expantion. Don't tell women what they can and can't do with their bodies
    4
  5. She isn't even seated and not part of the opinion
    3
  6.  @bigtobacco1098  depends on the woman's story. Women like Tara Reid who can't keep her own lawyers because she changed her story often shouldn't be.
    3
  7. Well there goes republican chances in the midterms
    3
  8.  The Turd Reich of Mar-A-Lago  I mean, we aren't even talking about the traitor Thomas is married to. She tried to help a coup
    3
  9.  @mouse2482  she never feigned ignorance she was asked stupid questions. The Republicans cherry picked from her long career cases that were subjected to sentencing guidelines. It was horrible and disgusting.
    3
  10.  @mouse2482  it's funny, I've watched the last 5 confirmation hearings and all of the republican justices seated lied in their hearings about this.
    3
  11. We need activists on the court when the Supreme court is near illegally stacked with conservative justices.
    2
  12.  @dakotajourdan9413  McConnell changed the rules at a whim and actually seated barret after trump lost. Ya, illegally IMO
    2
  13.  @dennisg4053  thats fairly presumptuous. You don't know the person let alone motivations. But if you think taking away a right is not going to attract huge backlash then you are fairly oblivious
    2
  14. Betrayed who exactly?
    2
  15. Republicans have no idea how much they just hurt themselves.
    2
  16. Worst man to ever lead the republican senate aide.
    2
  17. And then immediately pardoned by Biden
    2
  18. They are a national hero
    2
  19.  @valferguson8322  the one where 70% of the country is now pissed at this decision
    2
  20.  @mouse2482  someone calling Jackson an activist judge is being bigoted as she has impeccable qualificatiins. Sorry if you don't like living up to the definition
    2
  21.  @thememo6019  this argument by them is not only disingenuous but also complete overreach of the 14th. That being said it will also hopefully build the support for court expantion and possibly bigger majorities after the midterms.
    2
  22. When there is a child to parent.
    1
  23.  @davids.2703  I don't get how this is so hard. We don't count people until they're born. Not while they're in the woumb. We never have done this. The reason is because pregnancies aren't always viable and don't make it.
    1
  24. How is this a left wing trick? This is a decision by the Supreme Court, how did the left create this?
    1
  25.  @gypsyaguilar6678  how is pushing a minority religious belief onto the country not activism. Anti abortion is a religious debate and shouldn't be applied to the country. Especially one with the separation of church and state in the first amendment.
    1
  26. What just got released was their opinions on the case. Seeing as the last three trump justices all lied about this I think people have every right to be mad as hell
    1
  27.  @brieziethirteen13  we will give no help to those who hurt America. Right wing support for causes like this decision keeps liberals from caring. That and always being called pedos and groomers by the right.
    1
  28.  Rodney Howard  that's a dumb question. Perhaps ask one of your dumb friends. If you have an intelligent question, I'm your guy.
    1
  29.  @harrypeters3700  how so?
    1
  30.  @MrHondablink  we do know. We just don't care anymore. Republicans have been horrible to democrats for decades to where now all you do is call us pedos and groomers and want war. How is it hard to understand that when you do that to people they will not be there to help with your problems. This isn't hard to understand
    1
  31. So you're saying it would allow states to strip rights away they choose to. Regardless if they're covered in the constitution? Remember roe was ruled using the 4th amendment rights
    1
  32.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  ever heard about the fourth amendment
    1
  33.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  abortion is not a right. What's the right is for the woman to have governance over her own body. That is covered by the fourth amendment
    1
  34.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  I don't know why you are asking me when you can Google the roe vs wade decisions and the rationale behind it. I mean, I can't explain it better than they wrote it.
    1
  35.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  are my posts showing up? I said it was the right to self governance didn't I?
    1
  36.  @JohnDoe-ew3xt  lol so you obviously didn't read my last post and no, no amendments give scotus that right.
    1
  37. How can you say that without also saying the justices would be in on it too. It was their decision and all
    1
  38. I'm guessing there won't be any police going to the hospital. Nice change of pace for the capitol police.
    1
  39. I agree, then he deserves a pardon right after.
    1
  40. You know what's harder on a woman, raising a child in abject poverty just to watch her kid get swallowed up in gang life. That's what happens when you bring a child up in poverty
    1
  41.  @bryanbarton8610  that's so they don't hurt the mother
    1
  42. Nah, we will just vote you guys out.
    1
  43. I hope it was one of the justices and they say too fricking bad.
    1
  44. @Austin Duke seeing as the last three republican justices to be appointed all said this was a law that's set (I believe Kavanagh said precedent on precedent) wouldn't that mean they all lied during their confirmation hearings?
    1
  45. Lol prosecuting news because it leaks a story is the move of fascists. Just saying
    1
  46.  @garywilliams2188  absolutely but they also would deserve a pardon from those crimes too.
    1
  47.  Rodney Howard  where was that shown to be true?
    1
  48.  @fearthekrazy1896  ya, I don't know about your wife but mine has a really good memory.
    1
  49.  @fearthekrazy1896  ya but who are you to tell us that? How about I say you can only have gins at the range?
    1
  50. Hmm so if past decisions regarding our rights can be changed maybe there is hope for gun control
    1
  51.  Ladie Kadie  you mean the one more qualified than the two before her?
    1
  52. Like this court decision is?
    1
  53.  @mouse2482  just the bigots think that. Everyone else knows she is far more qualified than the last three appointed.
    1
  54.  @totallyjonesin  barett got appointed to her first bench by trump in 2017. Then three years later she is a Supreme court Justice. Ffs man think about that for a second. Jackson has had a federal bench for over 10 years.
    1
  55.  The Turd Reich of Mar-A-Lago  so much case law and precedent has been built upon roe that the long term effects for the right are going to bad.
    1
  56. Nope
    1
  57.  @Toxik_Dubz  and then immediately pardoned.
    1
  58.  @totallyjonesin  I just read 79% of independents are against this. Even a small portion of Republicans are against this. This is not going to happen without huge costs to Republicans in the midterms
    1
  59. Who?
    1
  60. Designed? By who exactly? This was leaked not created.
    1
  61. This just ruined republican chances.
    1