Comments by "" (@michaelhill8441) on "We need to hold Dems accountable for destroying our kids: Cotton" video.

  1. I couldn't agree more. There is a dangerous lack of understanding of how our country works
    8
  2. They were only men. They wernt Jesus
    5
  3.  Fun In Ukraine.  you haven't been watching the hearings have you
    4
  4. Save the children? What about the starving ones in America?
    3
  5. Perhaps you should. You seem confused
    3
  6.  @tomcloss9764  nice, hope the weather holds for ya
    3
  7.  @arturoeugster2377  I did a paper on them in university. They should be taught in school IMO
    3
  8. The thing destroying kids is gun, both literally and figuratively
    3
  9. You don't get truth out of these two.
    3
  10.  @lorag4664  far more than anything on fox. Hell, tuckers lawyers had to say his viewers were too smart to believe him as a defense in court. Man are you lost
    3
  11.  @lorag4664  I watched the entire thing and yes, I stand by my initial post. Either way, fox let's liars on air. We know this from tucker. Why would Ingraham be any different? Hannity too
    3
  12. That's because their actions aren't illegal
    2
  13. Hardly, do you have any idea how hard it is for Ukrainian children right now. Get some perspective man
    2
  14.  @rayshamrock  the poster complained about politicians not knowng the constitution and they should read it. I told her maybe she should read it.
    2
  15.  @arturoeugster2377  they were published. They're available to read online
    2
  16.  @tomcloss9764  that's never been my strong suit. I call the game whack f*@k.
    2
  17.  @Cartoontickling  was our comments too hard to understand? No, we didn't think you were on our side. I do ask though, where was racism in any of this?
    2
  18. Because Tom cotton is stupid
    2
  19. The shootings?
    2
  20. That's about right
    2
  21.  Fun In Ukraine.  Nancy wasn't involved with the magas that stormed the capitol
    1
  22. It wasn't closed. It was never opened ffs. It NEVER flowed oil.
    1
  23.  @BOZO1959  how much oil do we import from Canada? What years did we not import any oil?
    1
  24.  @BOZO1959  you never answered my questions.
    1
  25.  @johnmichaels4172  I meant from Canada.
    1
  26.  @johnmichaels4172  a quick Google search proves you wrong Between 1970 and 1973 US imports of crude oil had nearly doubled, reaching 6.2 million barrels per day in 1973. Until 1973, an abundance of oil supply had kept the market price of oil lower than the posted price. Perhaps it's not my inability to read that's the problem here. Maybe it's you spouting BS
    1
  27.  @johnmichaels4172  so how does that make my statement wrong. That embargo didn't last all year correct?
    1
  28.  @johnmichaels4172  you are wrong. Not being arrogant. You just keep moving the goalposts to be correct.
    1
  29.  @johnmichaels4172  ya, we still imported from non OPEC Canada man. This isn't a hard concept to grasp, not sure if it's because you're willfully ignoring it or not.
    1
  30.  @johnmichaels4172  the US energy information website says we never stopped importing from Canada through the 70's. Anywhere from 1 million to one and a half million barrels per day. Today it's around 3.5 million barrels per day
    1
  31. @UCvTXPkb40dn1Y5zzFKUGjrA did you even look? I find it easily in my search
    1
  32.  @johnmichaels4172  you know, don't let facts get in your way of pretending to be right.
    1
  33.  @alice2199  then get a lawyer to file charges. If Republicans are that inept that they can't file charges, why would you want them to lead? Or maybe you're just being lied to.
    1
  34.  @feffygracie  soon the DOJ. Just read the committee is giving all there records over.
    1
  35. He can run from jail
    1
  36.  @feffygracie  I think they mean the repuicans responsible for Jan 6. Cheney wasn't responsible for it.
    1
  37. They can't impeach and won't be able to after the midterms either.
    1
  38.  @Scumbagballless  you need 75 votes to impeach slick.
    1
  39. Repuicans are weak not because anyone tells them to but they choose to be.
    1
  40.  @dalejames8576  that shows with your school shootings but my guess is you're more like the cops from Uvalde
    1
  41.  @rayshamrock  because there are regularly a whole host of things in the constitution Republicans either ignore or don't know. Here is one, what constituional amendment did two separate Supreme courts use to allow for abortion. Why did 6 justices say that didn't apply anymore?
    1
  42.  @AnAmericanPatriot1555  yes she did but only because women's rights still haven't been codified by republican states in the equal rights ammendment. 12 red states still are holding out for the last 100 years
    1
  43.  @rayshamrock  the right to self autonomy is. That means the government can't tell you what to do with your body. Like forced vaccines.
    1
  44.  @AnAmericanPatriot1555  that's bs, I do understand the document. It was the due process clause that allowed for the right. If this is eroded what's next? A chip in every newborn? Forced vaccines on the population?
    1
  45.  @AnAmericanPatriot1555  don't get me started on the erosion of stare disisis either. This was the most dangerous decision the court has ever made.
    1
  46.  @AnAmericanPatriot1555  why did RGB say it wouldn't stand up to scrutiny? What reasoning did she use?
    1
  47.  @AnAmericanPatriot1555  its a right. The right to liberty. No state can make a law that denies a right.
    1
  48.  @tomcloss9764  you guys act like they were. The constitution has 27 amendments right. That's 17 times (aside from the bill of rights) it was changed because they got it wrong. It's a docu.ent that should change with the times to create a better country as its always done
    1
  49. today from the same publication Overall among registered voters, 41 percent said they preferred Democrats to control Congress compared with 40 percent who preferred Republican control.
    1
  50. For what exactly? Slowing a virus? Good luck with that
    1
  51. Yes it is, why do you think it's been amended so many times?
    1
  52.  @dalejames8576  that's not true at all
    1
  53.  @feffygracie  if they wernt sold anymore every gun taken would be one less. Thousands are destroyed every year in the cities but these kids can just order brand new and untraceable parts online
    1
  54.  @lorag4664  are you saying fox's lawyers didn't say that in court? Delusional is denying it ever happened.
    1
  55. Like watching them get shot so you can keep your guns? Hiding behind the 2nd is playing politics.
    1