Comments by "Ray Epps Second Cousin Reggie" (@gazinta) on "Paleontologist Trevor Valle Debunks "Dinosaurs Never Existed" Conspiracy" video.

  1.  @Kansirz  Evolution is a theory. Boom. Argument over. (Edit)And society isn't yours to dictate.
    20
  2. He believes dinosaurs are real. 😂
    14
  3. Angry rock doctor: "REEEEEEE!" Joe: "Hey man, you ever try DMT?"
    12
  4.  @TattoosAndBones  I've already stated earlier that I was a junior science Olympiad winner. I know about the scientific method. The steps between theory and scientific law are being bypassed because of people wanting the theory of evolution soooooo bad to be fact, that they're willing to write books the way they see fit. That's why the scientific community can't agree. Not all the data is in yet. That's not how science works. It's a COMPELLING argument, but compared to the Bible? They're equal. You just don't want to hear that. That's a bigoted approach.
    10
  5.  @rena10009  Effin Aye right! This dude is the same guy you'd catch outside the lesbian biker bar sniffing the seats.
    9
  6.  @sabin97  yeah. Isn't this attack on paleontology the same opposite of attacking Christianity? Shoes on the other foot, and it's really uncomfortable. Joe laughs right in his face about it, too.
    8
  7.  @TattoosAndBones  okay. I'm not going anywhere just yet. People that have out-of-bodies and claim divine intention also call it proof. Those old Jewish guys can't "prove" theres a God just like you guys can't prove the big bang theory. You're so busy trying to trash my argument(of which I haven't really taken a specific stance, BTW). You're the one being a bigot and embarrassing yourself. I'm trying to work with you here. You have all the answers, and defend bones. Without those bones, the theory of evolution crumbles. That's how weak that theory really is. So far, no human (other than a paleontologist) has ever touched a fossilized "dinosaur" bone. Especially you.
    7
  8.  @yogilune  The hormones comment was a joke. I think hes snorting estrogen, personally... Hes being a little bitch is what I was implying. Secondly, I believe creatures like dinosaurs COULD have existed, but were created by God and wiped out by a flood. You believe they evolved from a retarded fish-frog that fucked a chicken or some shit, then got wiped out by a big scary rock. Then a mole and a possum had sex and humans came out. That's what my science book told me. I believe it. Something doesn't add up to the theory of evolution. Come at me when you find the missing link. It might be buried in the jungles of Africa, though. Bring bug spray.
    7
  9. I had an ass dragon after eating Szechuan beef. True story.
    7
  10. Because he's a HACK! Aint no McDonald's at a dig site. Dig? He's taking the easy cheese and visits dig sites once every 5 years.
    6
  11. Kinda like a cult leader.
    6
  12.  @Kansirz  huh? Who said anything about religion? The reason you guys don't believe in God? No proof. Same thing here. Something resembling concrete("fossils") are "discovered". Probably by a white guy. Am I right?
    6
  13.  @therealayatollah2678  he has to believe this hard. He invested everything he is or will ever be to a potential lie? Hes mad because the argument posed makes his existence in paleontology limited, and it depends on it not being a fake. I'll guarantee he never found a dinosaur bone. He thinks he SEEN one once, but even then, it COULD have been a cast he was looking at and wasn't allowed to touch. "Trust me. Its real." was likely what the curator at the museum told him. They're literally scattered over the face of the globe, on every continent(supposedly), and survived earthquakes and ice ages for 65million years, but at the same time they're rare and delicate? Come on, man...
    6
  14.  @therealayatollah2678  I've said before. I'm repeating myself, but you're worth it, friend. My skepticism isn't with the existence, but the timeline of events. I believe in DNA, and I think its coded. I think every species has a distinct DNA suited only to it's kind. Humans for humans, dogs for dogs, whales for whales... Theres a disconnect between a fish and a human, but we supposedly had fins and flippers that magically turned into arms and mammary glands? Sounds kinda fishy to me. That's a clinical term. I think dna codes were set, and someone was tinkering with it. Then the flood came. It's just as plausible.
    5
  15.  @therealayatollah2678  The smartest people on the planet still only use 11% of their brains. What if we used to be smarter and we're DE-volving as a species?
    5
  16.  @sriousprobs477  Besides the fact that he's suckling on the taxpayer's teet. It's in his best interest to sell his narrative to anyone that accepts the fact that he eats and travels on everyone else's dime. And he looks well fed and rested.
    4
  17.  @RedrumZombies  the scientific method isn't a popular vote. It's scrutinized theories put to a test (with a control group or standard) to come to a UNANIMOUS conclusion. The only thing the scientific community can agree on is that it's still only a theory. Except people like this dude. This is his entire life and identity. If someone proves him wrong, he'll probably be found swinging from a bridge the next morning. I'm not investing my whole being into a theory.
    4
  18.  @si4632  you just helped my argument. Religion(the Bible) encourages people like you to explore the universe, the Earth, and all the creatures in it. But..... It also says that the wisdom of the world is foolishness in the eyes of God. BAM!
    4
  19. He knows nothing. He knows what other people wrote. I watched the whole thing. He didn't have one single thought that was his own. Just theories we already all knew.
    3
  20.  @yogilune  Yeah. Some serious hormonal problems with that one. I'll bet I could get him into a barfight on some shit like this! Just for funsies, I'm gonna go find me a paleontologist and take him out for some "beers with peers". Conservative edition.
    3
  21.  @matthewstuart2054  Traffic? I'll bet he Ubers everywhere because... Carbon emissions.
    3
  22.  @Kansirz  Theory is theory. Law is law. There is no "grey area". Theory isn't fact until it's a unanimous decision based on visual (observable) proof. Then WHY is the dinosaur not proof? Because. Theres a "missing link". I'm talking Scientific theory. Not Alex Jones and Sandy Hook theory. Shit that takes actual thought and insight. All theories must be proven BEFORE we take our victory lap. How easy it is to manipulate when the variables are still being made up in peoples heads. Y'all come at science like Socrates did. Ridiculous philosophy. That's not even science.
    3
  23.  @jkz8565  it's not that I don't "believe" in giant creatures that went extinct. I don't believe the humans that have to keep changing the story to match the theories.
    3
  24. Soy burger with Red Bull...
    2
  25.  @therealayatollah2678  An open minded person is both a curse and blessing at the same time. Theres so much stuff out there, of course people are going to eventually think they're right, and everyone else I'd just mean or stupid. That's what we have here. That's why I like theories. Lately it's been demonized. If you have a different theory, you're wrong. It could be one way, the other way, or both. Or niether... The available texts we have that date back to our ancients tell of giant "behemoths". Its plural and vague as we have no behemoths listed in the animal(or reptile) kingdoms. Those could be a brontosaurus or woolly mammoths. When have actual bones from them. In fact, there is a fully intact specimen that was encased in ice. It still had food in its stomach. We are only 150 years into the theory of dinosaurs and the asteroid that supposedly took everything out. Give the information time to age. Joe's guest is brain-raping people in this video. "Take it, bitch!" seems to be his attitude. I'd be surprised if some crazy woman is dumb enough to reproduce with this bigot.
    2
  26.  @Alic4444  lol. I was in the scientific community. My theory is that we are DE-volving. My theory is that humans are getting stupid-er and smaller. All species are. Trees, bugs, animals all seem to be getting smaller. This, we have actual bones of. THOSE actual bones(with marrow) kinda support the Bible, though. Can't have that...
    2
  27.  a sick nothing, truly a loathsome creature.  they will eat you if you disagree.
    2
  28.  @susanneduffy8157  Look. It's already been proven that the scientific community doesn't agree on anything. There's a reason for it. There's a struggle between truth and greed. The greedy people want keys to the U.S. Treasury, and the truth community wants actual data and facts. Those that want the money scare people into giving it to them for more "research". The actual researchers just need materials to research. All our models are easily manipulated or even fabricated to show a worst case scenario. Manhattan was supposed to be under 18 inches of water two years ago according to Al Gore and his uncontested movie(which him and Michael Moore made millions off of, BTW). The science was supposed to be flawless. Now we're supposed to buy it when a hippie says 40 ton behemouths left bones behind that are so rare and delicate that humans can't even see them? Youre buying that? Okay...🤪
    2
  29.  @jkz8565  Here's my dilemma and problem with their argument. The man literally says that they're so rare and precious that the museums only display replicas. Two minutes later he says they're scattered everywhere. Which is it?
    2
  30.  @yungchill69  what do you think a "behemoth" is? Those creatures were alive before the flood if the Bible is read as a history book.
    2
  31.  @Redpillroost3r  exactly. This dude takes government cheese. He's selling this so the People will keep funding him and his colleagues. This is how he makes a living. Hes passionate about his subsidies.
    2
  32.  @lahaina4791  He's literally a tool of his trade. People are arguing with me in here saying he's NOT selling anything. Dinosaur bones and facsimiles thereof are his capital. I like to hunt for meteorites. They are scattered across the globe. Now I'm just a hobbyist. But an astrologer gets PAID to say they exist. Just to say it. Let that sink in.
    2
  33.  @lahaina4791  okay. I'm down with prospecting and the like... I'm currently looking for doubloons in the Orlando countryside!
    2
  34.  @lahaina4791  indeed. The name of my game is NOT telling people that there's gold in those hills!!
    2
  35.  @drunkenmmamaster419  wait. What? Please send a link.
    1
  36. You win the internet!
    1
  37.  @sportingcomplex  go back and pay your taxes.
    1
  38.    I would be Biff. Just sayin.
    1
  39. I think that was the desired result. Like a pitbull fight!
    1
  40. I dunno. Given that two capitalists were competing, I don't believe either of them. I do believe that a creature like T-Rex would be the crown jewel of carnivores. I would draw a picture of this monster, then cast the bones. Kinda like they're done today. What we see in the museum's aren't the actual bones. Where are the actual bones? If they're so plentiful, why are we looking at fakes?
    1
  41.  just Wright  not according to them. According to paleontologists, the bones are so abundant that theyre literally finding 6 and 7 of the same species. Somewhere on planet earth should be some actual friggin bones the general public has access to. We dont. Only the creme de la creme have access to them. Those could be fakes, too. Nobody can touch them, and they're in million dollar vaults. I'm a skeptic by nature. Some people go outside of 50,000 years of evolution and just believe what everyone tells them. And you dont have an egg. You possibly have a calcium deposit that LOOKS like an egg, but you ain't hatching a velociraptor anytime soon.
    1
  42.  just Wright  yeah. If I was pulling off a hoax, i would make sure i had enough money to rent helicopters and have as many students as possible present so they could tell other people. You WORK at a museum? Then you're one of the ones they use to keep the story believable. You've been duped.
    1
  43.  just Wright  The benefit to making up a hoax? Money. People NEED money for heavy equipment, plaster(on site) glue, shovels, travel expenses, lodging, transportation, shipping containers, classrooms, more research dollars... Pun totally intended, but if this is a hoax? It's the mammoth of all hoaxes.
    1
  44.  just Wright  a helicopter? @18:59
    1
  45.  just Wright  okay. How many human or even primate fossils are on display in museums?
    1
  46.  @PFbigfan447  yeah. I work with concrete. I know how brittle a bone-shaped piece would be without reinforcement. It's almost as if they're made out of the same mineral composition, too. Hmmm...🤔
    1
  47.  just Wright  yeah. Independently wealthy from grants and subsidies. If I were in charge of the science department? I would create a problem, then claim I'm the only one with the solution. If I were REAL clever, I would involve a politician and have a debate. If I was a scoundrel, that is. People are panicking over germs right now. The general public is trusting people that drive Bentley's and Porsche's to level with them. You think they're to be trusted? Or are they gonna milk this? I say a paleontologist can be just as corrupt as Adam Schiff. They're probably buddies...
    1
  48.  just Wright  Um. Theres about 5 billion people on this planet that subscribe to creationism. I'm afraid that you're wrong. You dinosaur people are in the minority here. Evolution is still only a theory. That means even the scientists dont all agree to make it scientific law. It's got just as much actual proof as Judiasm. The Flintstones wasn't a documentary, y'all...
    1
  49.  just Wright  nice deflection, but the college professors(tenured) can basically teach whatever they want to, and still rake in a hundred grand. Easily. Some college professors make a million bucks or more. You might want to look closer...
    1
  50.  just Wright  yes. I won the Junior Science Olympiad when I was 16. I've seen a lab. I've seen a bowling ball, too. Dont mean I'm a 300 player though, does it?
    1
  51.  just Wright  I'm not a big fan of the current Pope. He's not a good man. However, I do recognize the Bible SUPPORTS science(through scripture). Why couldn't "science" work to PROVE an existence of a "God"(creator) other than DISPROVE that reality. If "God" wanted a giant spaceship, it would certainly be POSSIBLE... But the way He's described, it would be a giant waste of time and matter as we know it now.
    1
  52.  just Wright  Not exactly. The late Stephen Hawking even left the door open to creationism. Don't be rude and bigoted. Nobody said anything about proof but you. Both theories lack the necessary physical evidence to make a unanimous judgement either way. I said they should SUPPORT each other in practice and theory. You want to keep people continually divided. Good for you, window licker!
    1
  53.  just Wright  um. Burden of proof lies on the accuser. In all instances. You claim God isn't real? Prove it. I'm still waiting for someone to explain why calcium(the same shit that I can't chisel off my shower door) is so delicate and precious, yet abundant and is literally rocks. Pretty convenient when only the "elites" have ever even seen such specimens. "Trust me, I seen them." isn't proof. You're the kind of idiot that believes in the Loch Ness monster, but God is over the top stupidity?
    1
  54.  just Wright  dude. The bible clearly told the ancients to "watch the stars, seasons and observe even the ants..." It's in the very beginning of the book, but you asshats won't even open the Goddamn thing... That's really sad. The geniuses of the planet won't even open a Bible... Your loss...
    1
  55.  just Wright  exactly. Their science was wrong. That was advanced science back then. Just like they called out herasy back in the day, now you guys are literally doing the same thing. The definition(loosely translated) of science is the observation of the natural world, and drawing conclusions from those observations. The Bible literally tells everyone that reads it to track the stars in the sky and to watch the ants work. That's science, bro.
    1
  56.  just Wright  Seriously? Theres literally a star named after the King Solomons son, David. The early scientists were secular, but at least they paid respect to Emmanuel. They didn't reject him, and they used the stars to navigate. Cant do any of that stuff without science.
    1
  57.  just Wright  look. You guys work on the invisible boogeyman, and we will talk to the old spaghetti monster in the clouds. The only problem is that our invisible spaghetti monster doesn't cost the taxpayers 91 Trillion dollars. Yours does.
    1
  58.  just Wright  I believe a creature like a unicorn COULD exist or have existed, but with no actual bones.... See where I'm going with this?
    1
  59.  just Wright  if you accuse someone of lying, that person cant prove they're innocent. The burden of proof lies on the accuser. I could claim the sky is green. If you challenge me, you must then bring me outside to show me my error. I can't see no bones? They didn't exist. We say "show us the real bones!" Them: "Um. They're all in a big sterile, climate controlled government funded warehouse in the middle of nowhere. Nothing to see. Yeah, they're in those sealed crates never to be opened. Ever."
    1
  60.  just Wright That's what I'm saying. People got along and shared information in those days. Today we just try to prove each other wrong. I think Roseanne Barr is right. The human race isn't evolving, its imploding in on itself. That's what her "racist" planet of the apes joke was about.
    1
  61.  just Wright  the jewish and Christian bibles both support exploration and the zodiac as being relevant in the natural world around us. They encourage these observations. Science has supported the Nephilim story of the Bible, and if I'm not mistaken, there were also stories of abomination-like beasts that roamed the earth. Maybe even alongside humans. Some of what's in that book is actual history, but its coded. Jonah and the whale. Not to be taken literally. The "belly of the whale" is where the earliest temples were made. The bones on the shoreline were already erected and people would meditate in there. Like a wigwam. Chances are that Jonah was on the opium and high as fuck for 3 days. I'm guessing...
    1
  62.  just Wright  ...and yes, egyptians, saudis, jews and Greeks also took part. Everyone but the east asians. They have their own set of rules...
    1
  63.  just Wright  completely different topic. Traditional medicines were still science practiced throughout the ages. The first page of the Bible. "All plants, herbs and fruit-bearing trees..." According to the Jewish AND Arabic texts, God(Allah) made everything, then just cut man loose without instructions after he disobeyed the only one he gave... "Here. You figure it out." Like a disgusted parent. How does that cost money?
    1
  64.  just Wright  no. Science has never saved a life. Not even once. That's why we have cryogenics. They've possibly EXTENDED a few of them, but all of us take the same dirt nap... Eventually.
    1
  65.  @krabmeat  ...according to you, maybe. I just threw the word "capitalist" in there to see how many comments I could generate. Yes, I'm a socialist dinosaur skeptic. Sue me. After the virus.
    1
  66.  just Wright  Dude. The Greeks(when Jesus was alive) shared technologies and wanted to get away from mythology. The jews and Greeks had a common oppressor. The Romans. Who's Jesus going to trust? He traveled the known world with his uncle as a deckhand and tinsmith. After his gig with carpentry, he got a sweet job with his uncle. Went to Japan, India, China, England and even Denmark. I have a suspicion he was here in America and Austrailia, too. I cant prove it, but if he was in Siberia, he could have went down the California coast. He WAS gone for a long period of time. The trade routes? Jesus was on the "road to Damascus" in one parable. Damn. Trying to get you guys to open up a Bible is challenging. It's a book. Read the damn thing.
    1
  67.  just Wright  okay. Your argument NOW is that we have no Spirit. Just a meat bag with a bad attitude. That's what you're trying to sell me? I ain't buying it. Theres nobody that can tell me that I come from nothing, and I'm returning to nothingness. That's like saying you threw an empty box in the corner of the room and a TV magically appears in the box. Better yet, you and I are nothing more than a clump of cells that randomly collided, and now we have languages and a conscience and the knowledge of both life AND our own demise(aka dirt nap). The odds of a God are better than the Big Bang theory. At least with God, he created the spoonful of matter that exploded. With the big bang theory, at very least, theres nothing before 0:00001 No mass=no explosion Stephen Hawking had the same problem, and his conclusion was that it HAD to be created. He got alot of shit until he retracted his findings.
    1
  68.  just Wright  and no. A scientist never saved anyones life. Ever. Made it LONGER and more miserable, perhaps... Nobody can science their way out of a pine box when it all boils down. Get some fire insurance. 😂
    1
  69.  just Wright  Nah... Ive had an out-of-body. You can't sell me what i ain't buying. All good, though. Doesn't mean we arent good meatbags, right?
    1
  70.  just Wright  By your own logic, we come from and return to nothing. Explain emotions, then? Anger, fear and happiness all come from somewhere, too. Shouldn't knock folks struggling with their psyche, just like we shouldn't poke fun at people that believe in magical things. That's just rude.
    1
  71.  @staplewarrior4903  Real bones aren't fossils. They're bones. I'm not understanding why this concept is so difficult for people that are huge believers in the science of it all. Even this skeptic knows the difference between a real bone and a fossil. You're trying to tell me there's a museum with BONES in it? That only proves my case. They can't be 65 million years old. I'm skeptical of both stories. One of a flood, and one of fire and literal brimstone. I'm not decided as of either happened, but those Bible thumpers had the story first. Science is a "Johnny-come-lately" on the world scene.
    1
  72.  @staplewarrior4903  it's your argument. I lived in Chicago. I was raised there. We went to the Field Museum to learn the latest theories every April for field trips. I've seen the authentic replicas of actual fossils of real bone displays. That doesn't make radiocarbon dating a perfect science. A giant flood could produce the same numbers as a giant asteroid where widespread death is concerned. If a catastrophe of that size actually happened. Again. All of it is hearsay since none of us were there.
    1
  73.  @staplewarrior4903  You're okay. I didn't think you're being rude. Sometimes text is funny like that. I want the best things for ya, in a not creepy way. Lol
    1
  74.  @staplewarrior4903  Hahaha🤭 Now THAT came across as rude. You're a hoot!
    1
  75. He's a whiny, triggered little bitch. That's why Joe is laughing in his face.
    1
  76.  @sriousprobs477  I'm playing Devil's advocate for the most part. I just don't like bone bigots. I'm good, but someone that is preaching closed-mindedness is an asshat in my opinion. He's not saying anything besides what they taught us in 3rd grade. He's one of those "experts" that told us all Donald Trump had a 5% chance of being President. Need i say more?
    1
  77.  @RedrumZombies  it's a meme. I know you lefties have trouble with them, so I brought the clip. Enjoy. https://youtu.be/Cs86RL-Eaps
    1
  78.  @chad522  no. Joe was laughing because he just triggered a leftist. He was high, and it was funny.
    1
  79.  @chad522  That's what I said. Rogan has been getting his rocks off for DECADES pitting highly aggressive males against each other. It makes him happy. Look at him! He's like a little kid on Christmas morning! The fact that he has a liberal guest is only relevant to the person opposing his theory. It's not even his theory, either. Its Darwin's. Funny how it took an extra 30 or 40 years before they "discovered" a bone. I think it was plaster of Paris cast in sand, but... I'm outvoted. Scientific law is a unanimous decision where nobody can contest it. Science isn't fluid. Somehow this paleontologist missed that day in science class. Without even asking, you've already gone ahead and assumed my beliefs versus my knowledge.
    1
  80.  @chad522  political parties are more fluid than gender. There are conservative democrats and liberal Republicans. Then theres the libertarians. They dont know if they're left or right. Both "radicals"in name, but more like a bunch of passive-aggressives that tolerate each other because it's literally what that party stands for. Intriguing. My point is, is that I dont exactly know this man's political affiliation. But he's dead set that evolution is FACT. According to the entire scientific community, evolution is a compelling THEORY, but incomplete. Any calculations up until the "missing link" are null and void. Theres a major gap between actual bones and fossils. Almost too large not to notice. That's problematic. That's what the original poster was saying when he was jumping up and down. If Joe had mentioned ancient aliens, he would have lost his shit!
    1
  81.  @rehanmemon3969  having an open mind is what gets people into believing in God, dinosaurs or even the Santa Clause. Unfortunately, that's when people close their minds and become either skeptics or bigots. There's alot of bigots in here.
    1
  82.  @therealayatollah2678  They're all still only as valuable as theory. For now. I'm kind of a social atheist. I'm not going to invest my SELF into any one theory, hence my first stance. I can only speak for my own experiences, but the story has a counterargument built right into it. Pun totally intended. I never found a dinosaur bone, so it ranks up there with Santa Clause.
    1
  83.  @therealayatollah2678  The exact percentage(I must admit) was a number I heard when i was younger. THAT could be an inaccurate number. There is more storage in there that we don't (or can't) use. Well? If dinosaurs lived and are DEvolving into geckos and chickens used to be pterodactyls? We're fucked.
    1
  84.  @therealayatollah2678  They came here for fish tank cleaner. Lol.
    1
  85.  @Derek2k  never seen that flick. You did, though.
    1
  86.  @RedrumZombies  yeah, that's one theory.
    1
  87.  @FunnyxSniperxMan  of course he is upset. Imagine investing your money, taking out a loan, paying it off, then someone comes along and says you wasted all that time and energy on a weak-ass story about fictitious creatures that supposedly conveniently died all at the same time. Then fast forward to modern time and try to sell this hoax to others. He was taken out of his echo chamber and heard another theory that pissed him off. Yeah. I'd be a little upset too if someone told me God doesn't exist. Shoe's on the other foot, and he don't like the fit.
    1
  88.  @susanneduffy8157  Sorry. I have no proof. If i seen a dinosaur with my own eyes and had a time machine to know exactly what year i was in, i say God created them, and the others could be faked. I live in Kenosha. They dismantled our velociraptor, and it was made out of steel and plaster. Fake. Thats all i have for proof they existed. Fake pottery sculptures. That, and TV shows. You ppl are watching the Flintstones as if it's a documentary. Wooly Mammoths? Got flesh. Seen it. Contents of it's stomach and blood still entact. Bones of creatures twenty times their size and numbers for millions of theoretical years? Very rare find. The math don't add up. That's why im skeptical. Science keeps changing its mind, and very unreliable.
    1
  89.  @staplewarrior4903  Okay. What is that saying? That's saying at a non-specific period in history(assumedly millions of years ago based on a democratically elected theory) a global catastrophe happened. The distance in years between theories is what's being debated. Both sides have compelling arguments based on facts.
    1
  90.  @jakejutras5420  I'm just rabble-rousing. I know both sides of the argument here, so I can be flexible and skeptical at the same time. Some folks pour everything into one side or the other with completely unreasonable arguments, when in reality it's only mental gymnastics. Like bigfoot or dropbears. Some believe in them, some don't. I'm only here because I like making popcorn.
    1
  91.  @sidthekid1170  🤷
    1
  92.  @jkz8565  I do believe that gigantism or dwarfism(in our case) can happen in the blink of a historical eye. To think we are the most intelligent beings in the universe(i.e. we have all the answers) is pretty arrogant. Since the "scientists" hide all the actual bones, there's no proof in any museum I can see for myself. Just replicas. It's the equivalent to a statue of Jesus in my opinion.
    1
  93.  @stevenroetzel4470  That's all I was saying. I'm not taking a personal stance. I'm open minded enough to not mock either. Both sides have equally strong and equally weak arguments concerning dinosaurs. The thing i noticed about faithful people is that they'll die on their own hill if they have to. Some have faith in Darwin(until natural selection actually happens, so it makes them sad), and some have faith in God, but then say they "lose" a loved one in similar fashion.
    1
  94.  @stevenroetzel4470  To answer your question, the theory has to be proven by repeated, observable conclusions before it can get past "theory". Like global warming. Theres no control or experimental group. Therefore, it's easily the most corruptible cornerstone America has right now. In other words? This guy is helping guys like me out. I build fences around solar panels sometimes. Ironic.
    1
  95.  @jamesngahere4179  I think we have it backwards. I think the human race is DE-volving. If you look at our species from the outside looking in, it's almost obvious that our foreparents were much more sophisticated than we ever were or are now. Generally speaking, of course. For all we know, the Pygmies in Mongolia are probably laughing at us right now.
    1
  96.  @obiwanshinobi87  liberal loon, more like. He acts like someone fresh out of dinosaur Bible camp.
    1
  97.  @Mayan_88694  nice speech. Let's say(for a well spirited debate) that dinosaurs are and were real. Let's also say(for argument's sake) that the ancients also found massive skeletons and wrote about them in their mystical books... The people that can meet halfway and consider that the sky wizard invented and created them accept them as real as you do. But you're mocking them. There's your problem, right there. You're like: "Fuck you, dinosaurs were real, and your God is fake." That's no way to go through life, son... In fact, you're traveling the same road bigots do...
    1
  98.  @Mayan_88694  How do YOU know it was a male elephant? Did you assume it's gender, or are there only two?
    1
  99.  @Mayan_88694  to your SECOND comment, the THEORY of evolution is still only a theory. Just like the wizard worshippers, you have no evidence that evolution is scientific fact. I'm the opposite of you. I think humans and animals are DE-volving. The ancients were much smarter than we are as a whole. And they wrote shit down. Even the paranormal stuff. "Behemoth" is in the Bible. It predates any texts in your science books, and is a valid, compelling argument. I'm on the fence, so stop embarrassing yourself. Sway me, or quit talking. Fauci is your God, apparently. He is science. He said it himself.
    1
  100.  @Mayan_88694  um. I don't know if you can't read my writing, but I'm in the middle here. You're right. I don't have any proof , and neither do you. Those are compelling stories about two people that "found" dinosaurs. My mom used to hide brightly colored eggs in the bushes for me to "find" too. But I'm not out here using that as an argument that the Easter Bunny exists, much less speaking of some dude in Texas finding the same thing in his mom's flowerpots... Your move.
    1
  101.  @Mayan_88694  I thought I had ya on the gender thing. That'll come back to haunt you in here... I agree fully. Males are indeed supreme in the animal kingdom.
    1
  102.  @Mayan_88694  the reason I'm focusing on the gendered fossils, is because some females are larger than some males. Like humans. Just sayin.
    1
  103. It's old. My high school english teacher used to do it. That was 35 years ago.
    1
  104.  @kellysoria4526  where are they now, though?
    1
  105.  @kingbemo6744  nobody would believe it. Stand Lee couldn't make that believable...
    1