Comments by "Jack B" (@WindFireAllThatKindOfThing) on "Military History Visualized" channel.

  1. 59
  2. 9
  3.  @Fabrizio_Ruffo  Well, let me answer that for you: We were a mechanized cavalry outfit, Bradleys and Abrams. We couldn't run constant combat patrols in an urban environment in those. Nor would you want to. We racked up serious miles on our uplumbered (seriously, we had wooden armor at first) then bolt on armor kitted, then finally purpose-uparmored M1114 guntrucks. They did the job. It's like the difference between having a squadron of A-10's ready to fly (and that you're willing to risk) and provide CAS missions 24/7 vs. having a pair F-35's that will never be risked or are always down for maintenance. It's the difference between "It's there and it works vs. It's down for maintenance and we won't risk sending it" Also, people don't often get the perspective difference until they see it in real life: but a Ma Deuce and Mk19 are on a whole other level than the man portable MGs in a platoon on the march. NOBODY humps a .50 cal and it's ammo. But you definitely want it there for All Purposes that a GPMG doesn't work for. Hence, trucks. You're underestimating the power of the Jeep. Wildly different force multipliers than a weapon's squads portable 240b's, which still have to be emplaced and protected. A light infantry platoons job is literally to protect it's few heavy weapons as it moves about, not get lots of kills with rifles. And is the first thing a Platoon Leader is doing when contact is made: figuring out how to employ his most casualty producing weapons. Gun trucks negate the need for a whole squads worth of crunchies on foot to cover the guy with the GPMG and it's ammo, but rather need just a couple dismounts in the vehicle riding with it to provide that security.
    6
  4. 4
  5. 2
  6. 1