Comments by "Jack B" (@WindFireAllThatKindOfThing) on "David Pakman Show"
channel.
-
97
-
84
-
11
-
10
-
7
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
It is, was, and always has been about one thing before all others: A chance to get rid of Brown neighbors. They really think their candidates will ethnically purge the nation. Because that's what their party always hints it will do. Or at least 'stand back and stand by' if their voters do it themselves with their guns. Race war green light. America only matters to them if its a WASP country.
This is what they always meant by answering 'Don't like the way the country is headed' in surveys.
Their purge targets have an order of precedence: Black people, Trans, Gay men, Hispanic people, Arabs & Muslims (one and the same to them), Jewish people, Lesbians, Asian Indians, Pacific Rim Asians & Islanders, First Nations, White intellectuals
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
She serves on the Senate Armed Services committee, so she's not as weak-kneed on military concerns as people think. You don't get that job just being some hippie who misses Woodstock.
She's made her policy positions clear enough.
1. First and foremost, Consumer protections from predatory Banking buccaneers.
2. Stanching the bleeding from that insane tax cut.
3. Massive Education overhaul.
4. Sensible military spending, an end to our deployments that have been going for almost two decades. I can understand that, I'm a multi-deployment Iraq veteran, and my son was a toddler when I first deployed, and old enough to enlist himself when I finished my last one. That's goddamn ridiculous. She's no Anti-Military quack, she's just not a Raytheon/Boeing/General Dynamics stooge. As someone who did 25 years in the service, I have NO problem with us spending our money smarter, rather than just spending more of it. I'm a military fiscal tightwad. If being a grunt taught me anything, it was how to make things work on a shoestring budget. And the value of a well-executed cover up :)
5. Judiciary oversight and protections from partisan SCOTUS decisions. She's not for super-liberal justices, she's just for maintaining the non-partisan standard.
6. She hasn't made MAJOR statements regarding health care, she's pretty much just in line with the rest of the DNC for protecting the ACA and improving it. She has NOT come out for a Single Payer system, but has white-papered health care tweaks.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1