Comments by "Dan A" (@DanA-nl5uo) on "JUST IN: House GOP rejects unanimous consent on $2,000 direct payments" video.

Nancy Pelosi master politician at work. She could have suspended the rules and gotten it passed through the house but nope she was too busy staying home eating icecream.
14
Remember before this last bill the government spent $32,000 per every single American citizen in pandemic response funds. So ask yourself would you and the economy be better off today if they had just paid that $32,000 to every member of your household? Because the government of the United States doesn't think so. They believe the best ussage of all that money was trickle down economics. I know I would be better off with the money myself. We need a government that doesn't believe in trickle down economics because I am sick of being pissed on and told it is rain.
3
@darrennamoki4044 you seen to intentionally missed the point of my comment. We all knew there would be a single Republican willing to block this so why did the master politician choose to bring it for a vote in such a way to allow that outcome? The failures of others doesn't rationalize those of your own.
1
Crickett nope my comment was why did Nancy Pelosi choose the option that allowed herself to be defeated by a single Republican? Can you answer that?
1
Crickett well that worked out well.
1
Crickett so you are saying after waiting 7 months to get $600 from the Republicans she couldn't wait one week to get $2000?
1
Crickett mass eviction yup getting those $600 checks she spent 7 months working for will definitely address that problem when people are $5000 behind on avg. But you can't understand why a few more days is worth waiting after 7 months to get $2000???? Wow what a weak ass argument you have to take an approach everyone knew would fail.
1