Comments by "Dan A" (@DanA-nl5uo) on "Journalist questions State Department on US stance as UK suspends arms sales to Israel" video.

  1. Also our own laws. We have members of congress saying the arms shipments are in violation of the Layhe Law
    5
  2. Yes it is how all late stage empires treat their citizens.
    3
  3. ​ @Krafanio yet we haven't won one war since WWII. We lost to some of the poorest people on earth in Afghanistan
    2
  4. She means genocide but wouldn't get invited back for using language the ICJ has used.
    2
  5. We also had a federal court say they lack jurisdiction to stop the arms shipments as it is foreign policy
    2
  6. ​ @Barryislarge the federal case in California iirc blew my mind months ago because the judge agreed with the ICJ case by South Africa and said he wished he could rule against the arms shipments. That to me sounds like just cause for the ICJ to get involved as the American Judiciary just said there is no way to bring a case against our government for their role. One of the things that blocks the ICJ is a process in the country. We just said we lack one for enforcement of the genocide convention.
    2
  7. ​ @clivehyman309 the ICJ has ruled several times on the illegal occupation. As to how many Israelis are in violation just figure out how many live beyond the 1969 borders of Israel. You will be suprised.
    2
  8. Well both parties of oligarchy have said we will have the world's biggest military. Blindly following isn't the goal brute force is the last resource of a failed state.
    2
  9. Unfortunately neoliberal oligarchy has already become a global standard
    1
  10. ​ @MountainMusicRadio  denialism runs deep.
    1
  11. If this is the best that is sad. No one believes this bs.
    1
  12. Now he is looking at specific instances. For months he refuses to speak about specific instances when asked. He knows this administration is in violation of the Layhe law with every arms shipment to Israel.
    1