General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Dan A
DW News
comments
Comments by "Dan A" (@DanA-nl5uo) on "US election: Trump refuses to initiate transition process | DW News" video.
Unfortunately it is a banana republic with the worlds largest military. If the USA falls to fascism like Germany did in the 30s the military industrial complex has already built enough weapons to kill all life on planet earth many times over. So we have to take the rise of fascism in the USA as a deadly threat to all life on planet earth.
49
@signumcrucis71 wow you sure do love your authoritarian leaders. Dictators the world over thank you for your support.
13
@Unix_Based 10 time trump's lawyers have lost their court cases because they had to admit they didn't have any evidence of voter fraud. Also the trump lawyers have admitted in court that even if they could prove their case it wasn't wide spread voter fraud that could change the election results. Just like the claims trump made in 2016 about voter fraud and then disbanded his own committee investing it with no fraud found after over a year of digging. Someone should have read the boy who cried wolf to trump because the rest of us know how this story ends.
7
@mr123undead last time I checked pandemics didn't change the effectiveness of nuclear weapons so you still missed the point that we should fear fascist getting control of the worlds largest military.
4
10 court cases have proven the claims are false trump has lost all 10 cases to date about the election. But I know facts don't matter to the trump cultist like yourself.
3
@GabidenZhazylbekov nope we still have the largest military with something like 80 bases outside the United States and the most nuclear weapons. When you spend trillions of dollars a year on the military industrial complex you keep the biggest military.
3
Do we live in a democracy? Look at Bush v Gore. The supreme court handed Bush the election based on a coup started by his cousin and the GOP. The supreme court said in the ruling that it was a narrow focused decision. That means don't use this ruling to determine other cases in the future. Well fast forward to 2020 3 of the members of the Bush league team are now on the supreme court. Kavanaugh just used the Bush case as grounds for one of his rulings in direct conflict with the ruling itself being narrow in scope. So the issues with the electoral college aside are you so sure we live in a democracy? I have my doughts at this point.
3
@GabidenZhazylbekov billions of people in the Chinese army you say. Very impressive for a country with a population of 1.393 billion people. How did they get nearly twice as many people in the army then they have in their entire population???? You are a clown pulling your facts from your back side is how.
2
@christopherhall6471 yup Nancy Pelosi should refuse to seat any Republican who doesn't admit under oath that the election was legitimate. After all if you believe the election was fraudulent you have no place in government you where not elected to office.
2
You mean the 10 lawsuits that have been thrown out of the courts because trump's own lawyers had to admit they don't have any evidence of voter fraud??? 🤣🤣🤣 getting thrown out of court doesn't prove you right but rather the opposite.
1
Won't change the fact that he lost. Trump needs to filp 4 states to reach 270 votes in the EC. He lost by a landslide according to his own account of the 2016 EC vote. 2016 the GOP claims 304 was a landslide so today 306 is a landslide for Biden. Not my description but Trumps own description applied to the current race.
1
@Loriddian 10 time now trumps lawyers have had to admit they don't have that evidence in court and have been laughed out of the court room. You can't find what isn't there. There is NO evidence of widespread voter fraud which could actually change the election results.
1
@UC-pebbQmSlBKfUtTeCz7c1g the GOP isn't trump's political prisoners they are his co conspirators. All but one GOP senator voted to exnore his crimes and keep him in office thus becoming accesses after the fact in the eyes of the law.
1