Comments by "Dan A" (@DanA-nl5uo) on "CRAZED Trump Fans STORM Michigan Capital" video.

Calling people cowards while holding your safety blanket gun. Priceless.
47
Senator Graham just said they will help the unemployed more over his dead body. Cenk just did a video of it. I fear the ruling class is so out of touch this will end as a repeat of history. The last time someone started it by telling the peasants let them eat cake. I fear we are very close to that ending today with senators taunting the working class.
3
@ailblentyn if that business was in Norway it would not go under. Their government said if you where financially stable before the pandemic you will be whole after it is over. But here our government is more interested in repeating the consolation of wealth we saw after the 2008 crash. Over the last month there where actually 15 new billionaires in the USA while 30 million Americans filed unemployment. The government here has made their choice they have used the global pandemic as a device to increase their wealth. Check out Dylan Ratigan on the Jimmy Doore show he has done a great job explaining how this is being used by the same people who profited off foreclosing on 6 million Americans in 2009. Steve Manchin played a key roll then to.
3
@dontrump1091 small businesses will collapse because Steve Manchin has set them up with loans they can't repay. He is repeating the same wealth grab that got him wealth in the first place in 2009 when he played a key roll in foreclosing on 6 million American homes. The current foreclose crisis will make that look like pocket change. Because that time Bush and Obama gave the banks $780 billion to buy mortgages. This time the GOP and the fed has given out over 6 trillion dollars for the same ends. But then when the president had filed bankruptcy 7 times what can you expect? Mitch McConnell has already told states to violate the bankruptcy laws and file bankruptcy.
2
@kayde801 you are wrong the second amendment saids nothing about using you weapons against the government. I live in the state of NH where we actually do have a right to revolution built into our constitution but it is clear that is after all other means have failed. Which means these protesters if they lived in NH and have that state conventional right would have first had to fight a court battle all the way to the supreme court before they had tried all other means as the constitution of NH requires. So sorry but taking your gun to the protest to intimate the government is an act of terrorism. If you don't believe that look up the definition of the word terrorism.
2
ENDEAVOR RADIO CONTROL ter·ror·ism /ˈterəˌrizəm/ Learn to pronounce noun the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims. Why take your gun if not to intimidate the law makers? Where the protesters planing on commiting murder or just worried they would need to use deadly force to protect themselves from the other protesters? Sorry but it is using violence or intimidation for political goals which is the very definition of terrorism.
2
ENDEAVOR RADIO CONTROL sorry but speach come from your mouth. Death threats come from a gun. Those are not the same thing.
2
@kayde801 for the security of a free state doesn't mean you get to shoot the government. In the time it was written there was no standing army and the goal was to defend the government not attack it. So no you don't get to shoot the government with your gun. That is called assasination and treason. As in when the southern states tried to rebell.
2
@kayde801 dude you think your weapons can defend you from the government that spends nearly 1 trillion dollars per year on the worlds Biggest military???? Wow you are denser then a box of rocks if you believe you can stand up to the US military. Or for that matter if you believe that the government will need to draft you to defend it with your gun. The reality is that the second amendment was written in a time when the government had no standing military it doesn't apply well today when we have the worlds largest military. Because the reality is the first time you try to actually fire that gun and used it for anything but a security blanket the government will kill you as the terrorists you are. Even back in the 1800s the southern states combined failed. You have no chance against our military. They will kill you and then finish their cup of coffee without thinking twice.
2
ENDEAVOR RADIO CONTROL what is the peaceful purpose of a weapon of war? You either have it as a security blanket or you plan to kill someone that is the purpose. Clearly you are not hunting wildlife during a protest. Stop claiming guns are peaceful they are either for hunting or for war. There is nothing peaceful about bringing weapons.
2
@kayde801 you mean you can intimidate the government that is covered under the definition of terrorism so you need to improve your reading skills. But I am sure you won't because people like you feel the need to hide behind their guns.
1
So do tell are you a murder or a coward? Because those are the only reasons to take a gun to a protest
1
ENDEAVOR RADIO CONTROL you haven't told me what legal activity you needed your gun for at a protest. Was it open season on humans or where you such a coward you needed the weapon and a security blanket to defend yourself from the unarmed lawmakers? You refuse to answer that simple question with all your ranting because you know the only reason to take the weapon to a protest is to intimidate the lawmakers. That is an actor of terrorism. Terrorizing the lawmakers with your unspoken threat of murder if you don't get your way.
1
ENDEAVOR RADIO CONTROL you mean you can't explain what you where planing to do with a deadly weapon at a protest except use it as a security blanket for yourself or a threat of deadly violence on others.
1
ENDEAVOR RADIO CONTROL wow the deflection to cars. I will grant you far right terrorists did run over Heather Higher. But you clearly know you are wrong. Enjoy your Wako Texas moment though I am sure the worlds largest military will have no problem dealing with you're little attempt to overthrow the government.
1