Comments by "Steve Watson" (@stevewatson6839) on "TIKhistory" channel.

  1. All paradigm shifts begin like this with folk laughing at you and denouncing you; then twenty-thirty years later they are saying it was obvious and you had very little to do with... switching society's tracks.
    1
  2. I stick to science, philosophy verified. Most philosophy, like most economics, is bollocks.
    1
  3. What; the Frannie who knocked about with theJunta back home? The guy is Fash and in bed with murderers himself; not to mention heading up the world's largest paedophile ring. JC said "Suffer the little chidren to come unto me" not "Make the little children suffer and cum in the Padre's mouth". Get lost.
    1
  4. Understandable reaction from the Jews? So much for the 10% higher 1.Q.; this is like sink-estate numbnuts attacking pediatricians thinking they have something to do with nonces and kiddie-fiddlers. Strange how the attackers always seem to have bought into the bloody stupid when you examine "mostly peaceful demonstrations" in any time or place. Don't give tossers figleafs, Lewis.
    1
  5. Putin has a hammer; not a rapier. Moscow has been telling us for thirty years they viewed NATO as an existential threat. The USA and its' pet poodles are nowhere near blameless in all this and It has all been entirely predictable.
    1
  6.  @RAAM855  Ian Kershaw. You've not read the title page; never mind the rest of the book. 🙄
    1
  7.  @dmitripazlov491  The Algorithm is weird that way.
    1
  8.  @cyberninjazero5659  I note Jamie didn't actually name the guy: only the nation. YOU generated your own conclusion! I immediately thought Churchill was meant.
    1
  9.  @cyberninjazero5659  The Phoney Victory; Peter Hitchens, is another.
    1
  10.  @YouAreLovedxox  Someone totted their death-counts in the bible. The Devil scored ten; God killed all the world bar seven and that was just the beginning, millions more followed!
    1
  11. They never did map onto Anglosphere politics at all well in the first place. The terms come from an entirely different and deeply bollocks political culture from our perspective.
    1
  12. It is hard to have that as a neutral thought; but it is true. Jews have an unerring ability to either have bad ideas and mainstream them, or to latch on to bad ideas and mainstream them. It bites them in the bum everytime; but it is what it is.
    1
  13. No one is. You need folk who steelman The Stupid to get it through to folk that it IS stupid for one. More free speech is ALWAYS the answer. Censorship is NEVER the answer.
    1
  14.  @DannyBoy777777  I can't help it if some wankers aren't paying attention. Fuck off, mate.
    1
  15.  @marcnoday4450  Acts 5:1-11 "Great fear seized the whole church and all who heard about these events." What was your prof's point? There is a clear line of descent. Australopithecus Afarensis and Homo Sapiens are wildy dissimilar at first glance; but once you include all Sapiens' ancestors and Afarensis' descendants the connection becomes clear. Crudely; Xtianity="New Jerusalem"=Labour Party. Socialism is what emerges when you shed God from Judeo-Xtianity.
    1
  16. Wait, TWO brain cells? How'd that happen? 🙂
    1
  17. The swastika occurs in many churches from Kiev to Amiens and on the stoles of priests and bishops. The swastika is a near-universal symbol found all over the world. Don't be such a prat. Park the Objectivism; it is leading you way off into the boonies and you are, hopefully inadvertently, producing another distortion of what Hitler was about and what Naziism actually was.
    1
  18. In the early thirties Musso hated Dolphie. This only changed after Munich.
    1
  19.  @dragosstanciu9866  Oh, yeah? I think you'll find we were changing our minds at the time, as were the French. National leaders; the clue is in the title.
    1
  20.  @konstantinkelekhsaev302  When 'red' became beautiful because Reds.
    1
  21.  @andrewjohnston9115  "Strange Victory" by Ernest R. May and "Blitkrieg Legende" by Karl-Heinz Friese should answer most of you questions well enough in the meantime.
    1
  22.  @fredjohnson9833  Ramsey expected to get less than 30'000 away. He got a third of a million off the mole and beaches. I think that says all that needs saying. Antietam was a Union victory. It was in the exploitation of that victory that McClellan fell short. At Oriskany the Americans achieved their objectives and they were left in possession of the battlefield; the Loyalist having retreated to their own lines. American victory; allbeit pyrrhic. What was the objective and was it or wasn't it achieved? is THE question to be answered. If you were asking about the campaigns these actions occured in, you might get a different answer though. McClellan not exploiting his victory certainly lengthened the war by a year or more; those British troops gotten off would, given 'Madman' Churchill, have meant withdrawals from elsewhere and probably butterflied 'Compass' (Hobart's creation in Egypt was probably the ONLY British force that was an all round match for a panzer/panzer grenadier division.) and thrown a spanner into the early demise of Italian East Africa. Moving on four years, we were out of army reinforcements around D-Day, the absence of those saved from the beaches could conciveably have meant the changing-up of the invasion to following Sicily for want of troops on our part. With all the risks that would have entailed. These things therefore can't be considered in isolation; but if we do so consider I don't see where the arguments lie for failure or defeat in any of these cases.
    1
  23.  @TheImperatorKnight  History of Economics=History of Philosophy. Neither are Economics or Philosophy; but they do tell where we came from and give you concrete examples of brilliant folk being "dumb" because they couldn't know what was then unknown.
    1
  24. There is monarchy and there is monarchy. Crown-in-Parliament Queen Anne stylie is a LOT different than today's bollocks for instance.
    1
  25. We aren't going to read the books for you, son.
    1
  26.  @randomnepali7772  THIS IS SPARTAHHH!!!
    1
  27.  @str.77  Yeh; it is voluntary... this is why Ananias and his wife Sapphira are murdered by Peter. 'kin 'ell r u 1 steaming great nit.
    1
  28.  @pamcollins2178  Unfortunately I've seen, heard, and smelt things that were ENTIRELY generated by my bonce. Perhaps as many as 5% of the population do. With an entirely natural explanation for what the Pillars and Paul claimed being a known fact of brain science; you are on a hiding to nothing.
    1
  29.  @ponti5882  Triggered much? Glad to have gotten under your skin. ;-)
    1
  30. You should thak your lucky stars - $8 in parts of Californicationland.
    1
  31. ​ @soulknife20  Carrying a lamp in daytime; looking for an honest man. Alexander: "What can I do for you?"; Diogenes: "Get out of my light." The guy was based.
    1
  32.  @aidanm.655  The Socrates of the 'Dialogues' is a fiction. See Xenophon and Aristophanes' different again, and from one anothers, portrayals of Socrates. There is no favouring the one over the others; and all could be wrong altogether.
    1
  33.  @youtubehatesus2651  Religion is the bollocks before philosophy and philosophy the bollocks before science.
    1
  34.  @aidanm.655  You misunderstand me. Pontius Pilate was a real person; the character in the Gospels is a literary fiction. The Pilate of Josephos' histories is a totally different animal. We have the same going on with the Dialogues: that Socrates is a fictional portrayal. If you look at the other characters; while real some never met and others didn't even live at the same time. Aristophanes' character is a comic exaggeration. Xenophon's Socrates is dull as ditch water in comparison to both. I think Xenophon's might be the most accurate portrayal; but all of them are distortions; either for scurruious comedy or apologetic..
    1
  35.  @TheImperatorKnight  Most of the time you are ranking probabilities, so a fair chunk of history does boil down to Bayes. The turning point of WWII? There wasn't one, the Axis had lost when it broke out.
    1
  36.  @lukenodag5784  Your guys are saints because they murder, rape, enslave, and abuse somewhat fewer people?
    1
  37.  @Saw_Squatch  New Jerusalem, sunbeam. Communism is just Xtianity without God. Acts 5:1-11
    1
  38.  @Saw_Squatch  Never picked up a New Testament have we? "Hate your parents; buy a sword"
    1
  39.  @wolfgang6517  Doesn't get Franz Joseph off the baayonet though. Karl was a good egg but by the time he ascended the throne it was a bit late in the day. We could have done better by the man and I agree Otto would have been a better choice than a either the Fascist Dolfuss regime or Nazi annexation. But only better than those. Anyone with a hard-on for the EUrine is verbotten in my book. :-)
    1
  40.  Bardia ghanbarzade  Fuck off Nazi.
    1
  41.  @ottovonbismarck2443  Dina fash; you were more right than wrong and I was nit-picking as much as providing fuller info. 😃
    1
  42.  @ottovonbismarck2443  I've seen far dafter things, but okay.Extra points for insisting!
    1
  43.  @Chud_Bud_Supreme  Depends on your Humanist. All we have in common is we put man front and centre and relegate "gods"/"God" to twat waffle.
    1
  44. That is common amongst freedom absolutists in the British Isles. They came for our games; our comics; they came for "Pop" culture.
    1
  45.  @TheImperatorKnight  I thought it was the algorithm! Seriously; you can't be too much of a free speech absolutist. If Alphabet do it, you can't go wrong doing the opposite is my rule of thumb.
    1
  46.  @alphana7055  Marxism is a science in the same way homeopathy is medicine. Just fuck off already; you are making yourself look stupid.
    1
  47.  @KyleCox404  Conservatism and Liberalism are two sideds of the same coin. They need one another to function in the English political tradition. Unfortunately Liberalism jumped the shark around the turn of the 19/20th centuries and got swallowed by Socialism, which I DO think are JudaeoXtian heresies, instead of the other way around. Whether the CUP would have made a better fist of it if THEY had followed Bismark is moot. That Engels "prophecy" of WWI; is the source material on the web in English and if so do you have a link? From what I can gather already he didn't go much beyond "massive global war" because he thought beyond that matters became too chaotic. If true, kudos to him.
    1
  48. The panzer III was ordered by AH to have a long 50mm gun. He was ignored. This had a knock on effect by time he discovered he was being lied to. The Germans went east not as well equipped as the could have been. I've also wondered why a panzer IV with a sloped glacis at least wasn't produced. All that aside, the least said about British armour the better. The USA had monster tanks too, only the fact they could not be shipped across the ocean easily, or be used in a landing, stopped them building them.
    1
  49. Didn't miss your "editor" at all. You found yourself doing more with less; amusingly in describing Rommel winning a battle similarly. Happy New Year; now put your feet up; we don't want you repeating Rommel's next twelve months yourself!
    1
  50.  @jrton1366  'kin 'ell. Lewis' point about Dickens goes for the Kraut shit too. Too close to the problem and arse about face.
    1