Youtube hearted comments of Steve Watson (@stevewatson6839).

@TheImperatorKnight That is being against Communist bastards rather than Canucks in general though. 😁
114
Thanks for answering one of my queries TIK. Tripling forces in Denmark makes sense, the Danes resistance was more subtle than blowing things up and you could actually rest and refit troops there, fed from local resources adjacent to the Reichs rail network still and also in a position to reinforce Norway if necessary. The figures I had in my head for Norway were quite a bit larger than you showed here. The Scandinavian deployments make more sense now the exagerated information I was relying on has been corrected. Take your time geting well, it should be obvious from Stalingrad the dire effects of running on empty. You are doing a great job; but YOU are more important than it. TTFN.
5
@junior.von.claire "Slapping incident per Patton" already has a TIK video. A few years ago now, so you'll have to dig, but it is here.
3
Brown is actually orange, Lewis.😉
3
Happened before WW1, mate. Look at the 1906 - 1916 "Liberal" govt. A Socialist's wet dream a lot of the time; even the King was half-Commie!
3
This is the first punt at an explanation I've seen that makes sense. My first question was why was this coming in from the Arctic if it originated in Chy-Nah (sic)? Fun fact: the Myasichev aerospace design bureau in the Soviet Union built an anti-balloon fighter along the same principles as the U2 because.... Dun, dun, duhn!!! the US sent very high altitude spy balloons over the USSR and PRC in the Fifties and Sixties. As per the US Govt. has its' knickers in a twist because it was egregious in doing what they claim of their "enemies" well before, by sixty year plus in this case, whatever they are accusing those "enemies" of doing. We have met The Enemy, and he is US. /s 🤣🤣🤣
2
@ruberxwibebadhi Steady on, mate! Let the lad catch his breath. 🙂
2