Comments by "harvey young" (@harveyyoung3423) on ""I've Been Called a Traitor to Islam by Islamists & the Left". Islamist threat to Western Democracy" video.

  1. Could you class the public buildings "smoking ban" as a form of "how non-violent Islamism is threatening western democracies". Because pubs could be targeted indirectly though the concept of "public building" and "heath care" and "risk" to other people and the staff. Even when air extractors were fitted. The immediate outcome was the gradual expulsion of mostly men from the pubs, followed by waves of massive pub closures. This could be viewed both as the break up of the traditional working class spaces and/or the gradual closing of the public space for the tradition of the public drinking alcohol. Real intelligent policy is double effect (Covert) slow (exculpatory), I guess a Derridean authorless text. I recall Roger Scruton writing about this "I Drink therefore I am" its also subliminal as in sub legitimate, sub consenting, sub democratic. Look soon, the "HealthCare Professionals" through Community Social Care of protecting others by protecting the NHS expenditure, will be banning drinking in your "private spaces" too. Now correlation and connection does not mean causation, unintended consequences exist too. But what is clear is there is a great deal of "freedom of Speech" in conceptualisation of the expression of policy to reference a specific target (John McDowell "Mind and World"). Compare Derrida's Signature Event Context and McDowell's "Singular Thought and the extent of Inner Space" . I recall Roger Scruton called Derrida charlatan, and McDowell one of the Oxford Technocrats. I think he was wrong. Evidenced by Derrida's "Ltd Inc" and McDowell's "Mind and World". But he was right about he constitutive roll of pubs for the working class. Kind of similar to the 19th century Paris project of dividing up the public space with trees and public time with staggered factory and office end of day closures. Now where and when is the reference for something like what Hegel called the condition of self consciousness of the working class? Is this Islam through the back door or just public middle class divide and control? no possible evidence, but i spoke to a Christian in a position of great power at the time i wasn't trying to deceive him but he explained how he and someone else in a position of even greater power were in the project of doing with this nothing to do with Islam. its middle class control and equality and maximum production from, and division of the working class. A political dark art maxim "If they know what the policy is meant to do, then its a bad policy". Tactics? Well where and when was the Genesis of the formalisation of of Freedom of Speech?" Apologies for the unintended length of this.
    1