Comments by "Rutvik" (@rutvikrs) on "Let's Talk Religion" channel.

 @october3rd213 it's a fake account. To think of the origins of Hinduism as monotheistic makes as much sense to insert a 2nd amendment narrative into the Odyssey.
11
20:25 Buddhist schools of thought in india did believe in nihilism at the time. The framework of Purva Paksha entails the scholar to start at the opposite view.
7
@Sundar... so true man. The Tamils have always been a separate nation-state. The Tamil kings fought multiple defensive wars against Hinthi imposition going back to 1500 BC. Tamils have always been Christian(Even Jesus spoke corrupted Tamil called Aramiac which derives its name from Eelam). Thiruvalluvar wrote a corrupted form of the Bible because of the Hinthi imposition by the Brahmin kings. It's rather unfortunate to see Kannadigas, Telugites and Malyalis fall for the Bihari Hinthi imposition. I hope they wake up from the stupor to realise they have been speaking versions of Hinthi corrupted Tamil and return to the original Christian language.
5
@Sundar... what is my perverted agenda? 😢
5
@Vishnu-dk2rc he deserves the hate because his words still run the courts in India.
4
True. Kashmir has never been "Hindu". It followed a version of Buddhism that was closer to Islam than Hinduism. The locals had even realised that Buddha was a failed, fallen prophet and kept waiting for a Turkic liberation that would bring an Arab religion. Even the name of the land translates to "Only if there was an Amir/Emirate" Kash-Emir. This is further proven by the Quran's multiple chapters dedicated to the land of Kashmir. Also I am disappointed by this video. Lala has always been Muslim as all human beings are born Muslims.
4
Who gave women the vote, @sgttomas ? Not allah. That's for sure.
3
1:29 ?
2
@afsanakhan7071 I like how your comments pick incidents far away from context. Let me try it out. He bought Germany out of recession and hyperinflation caused by the vindictive treaty of Versailles. He instituted the largest and fastest spree of industrialization. He cared about environment, animals, renewable energy, sustainable farming ahead of his time. His efforts towards science got humanity to space. His scientific endeavour led to the largest database of effect of poisons and noxious substances to humans (still in use today). As you can see the despicable pos Hitler was of some use to humanity. Alamgir is just a poster for islamofascists to f@p to
2
So are moving images. Stay away from YouTube
2
@Sxcheschka agree. They need to make their mind up.
2
Some of them.
2
It's shirk to interact with images. Stay away from YouTube.
2
Just trying to make sure his head doesn't take a vacation from his body. Also don't the magic squares and Hamsa hand symbol land a little too close to our home?
2
It's bizzare to equate the two. The concept of Satchitananda would be irreconcilable even to the most liberal interpretation of Sufism.
1
@afsanakhan7071 1. The comparision between Hitler was apt. They were both men put into tough untenable positions and both chose horrible routes which from their lens seemed necessary. The only exception is that Hitler is despised in the modern world and his work is separated from the man in recognition of the evil deeds. Aurangzeb on the other hand has seen multiple attempts to exonerate him from his deeds and the fact that his document is used for jurisprudence for modern Indian Muslims is baffling at the very least. 2. Aurangzeb did not have the strongest army in the world, just the subcontinent. And even that is contestable considering that the bloat led the coffers dry. It was the end of economics of war. 3. It's laughable to think that Aurangzeb was kind to the majority when the hatred for him permeates from pre British sources. He is being judged from his own records, that he took pride in. He even tried to deface and destroy Ellora(if you have ever been there the cannon marks are still prominent), an abandoned temple and monestry at the time. There are numerous edicts that implicate his hatred for other communities. 4. It's true that he had the highest wealth, but that statement in of itself the betrays a lack of understanding of the Mughal royal court economy. A rich royal does not make a country prosperous. A lot of his opposition including the deccan sultanate was due to his bad economics. 5. How are the Mughals the founders of India? That statement is not true from any framework, India was geographically united multiple times. The name Bharat predates the Mughals and even the Turkic slave empire by millenia. Why is the epic named Mahabharat in that case?
1
Spicy
1
The origin of magic squares is Sanskritic culture. I treated this video as perhaps a parallel tradition until he mentioned childbirth. Definitely a Hindu thing.
1
Debased*
1