Comments by "Rutvik" (@rutvikrs) on "ThePrint"
channel.
-
548
-
420
-
157
-
154
-
133
-
117
-
85
-
84
-
83
-
71
-
62
-
56
-
54
-
52
-
45
-
43
-
42
-
41
-
40
-
38
-
37
-
35
-
34
-
34
-
33
-
32
-
31
-
31
-
30
-
30
-
29
-
29
-
29
-
28
-
27
-
27
-
27
-
26
-
26
-
25
-
24
-
24
-
24
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
23
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
22
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
21
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
20
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
19
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
18
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
17
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
16
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
15
-
(I am saddened that I need to spell this out in English so that people can understand, such is the state of empty liberalism in this country)
The minister's statement has conflated issues:
1. The idea that Karva chauth is preventing scientific enlightenment: there is no causal link, Karva chauth does not prevent anyone from attending schools, reading or education in general. It's not a daily ritual that consumes time either. I am happy to hear how Chinese and American women gained an edge over Indian women due to this practice.
2. Karva chauth is a ritual hence unscientific: science and culture are separate domains. Science informs you on facts of the universe using deductive logic and culture informs you on how to deal with life using inductive logic. There is no need for any ritual to be scientific. If you disagree, show me how music, poetry and dance is scientific. I will wait. In fact art of any nature is obstructing science, a majority of humans choose to spend time creating and consuming art, poets should have been writing scientific papers instead of useless poems. How many here bunked a class to watch movies?
Ritual belongs to the domain of culture. It is not restricted to religion. There are several secular rituals. Tell me how a birthday, new year celebration, independence day, Pi day(3/14) or even World science day is scientific. Even animals in the wild have been observed with rituals(wolf howls, cock-a-doodle-doo, pre mating). This is not genetic but predisposition to form rituals is. That is why there is no universal culture.
3. Karva chauth is mysoginist: i am conflicted on this personally. A part of me says this ritual has lapsed in its purpose as every festival is linked to cycles in agriculture(India is urbanizing), war(we don't do that at the same scale and frequency) or forming social relations(Karva chauth is for women in close knit societies bonding). Our life has changed and thank goodness we are not Muslims, we change with times(tell me the last time you worshipped Indra, Vamana avatars or Bhrahma.). Other side of me says it's not oppression. It's an ritual of nominal sacrifice, where a woman does so for a belief. I have not heard of thousands of women being beaten up or forcibly starved for the ritual, feel free to correct me. So why interfere with a ritual which people partake in mostly voluntarily? It's how people see it fit within their personal confines of culture.
Before you come at me, I am an agnostic atheist myself. Been associated with early days of atheist republic and even wrote articles for them. I have not rediscovered god or religion but am aware of Hindu/Indic lexicon and philosophy to the degree i can differentiate a valid critique from hyperbole like this statement or sarcasm. I retain my agnostic stand. There probably isn't a god or reincarnation.
15
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
14
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
This conversation is an embodiment of why data has no meaning without qualitative analysis. He is wrong on several counts(Oh and I am a Kannadiga not from the north):
1. India has chosen states to become "earners". Example: MH's high GSDP is due to the financial center Mumbai. If FDI flows in today, it comes in through the state even if the resulting factory is in Gurugram, Coimbatore, Pune, Bengaluru or Noida. The concentration of Banking/Financial institutions is the reason. Just like that, PB and HR were chosen for the green revolution.
2. Coming to the south, TN was chosen for industrialization via Freight equalization policy. The entire belt between East to Central India lost its industries because of this. That is why TN which has not been the source of ores has the industry, but JH, BR, MP, CH, OR, AP, KR and even MH have the mines but the value add production is concentrated at TN. Another example is Coimbatore's mills are run predominantly by people groups from AP while India's cotton fields are predominantly between AP to GJ.
3. The nativist/regionalist/separatist sections of these selected states like PB, TN, MH have a spurious assumption that their inherent geographical advantages that caused their selection exists everywhere but the other states fail because of their "politics" or "education" or even "ideology"
(Additional points in replies else YT will delete this comment)
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
13
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
12
-
11
-
This guy deserves a chapter in our future text books as the prime example of correlation does not equal causation.
1. His answer should have been, MH earns most of its GST in the city of Mumbai. As the financial capital, it recieves the foreign direct investment even if the economic activities happen in other states. They are one time or statutory transactions. KA/TN/HR on the other hand see this money first hand. MH was always going to see a smaller share of tax devolution, commensurate to the amount of economic activity in the state.
2. Instead he brings the cuckoo narrative around the axiom of population change. Correct me if I am wrong, but no state in the Hindi belt has a baby boomer policy around linguistic majoritarianism. South Indian TFRs dropped due to chunks of its population involved in manufacturing/ trade and relative local inflation due to economic mobility.
3. He straight up lies on population criterion being 75%, when the 14th and 15th finance commission caps it at 17.5 and 15% resp in written policy.
4. As a native of the state, Karnataka politics never revolved around the central allocation. 1.3% voted to spite the BJP, not for freebies. If anything the "son of the soil" JD(S) took the largest hit. This is simply infusing the kind of freebie politics that DMK has on to Karnataka.
5. I wonder why he focuses on BIMARU when there is another correlation that has worse cumulative ratio. Border hill states, J/K and NE India. If Bihar gets 900 for the 100 rupee it earns, all of the hill border hill states(Except HP) recieve north of(pun intended) 1000 with Arunachal at 4000. I may have a working theory on why these former set of states are in focus, it could be the percived political nature of the language spoken in Belt.
6. We could have had a far more interesting conversation if we discard propogandists like him because I bet he will walk away once his political objectives are met. Regarless of the state we need to spend more on capex instead of welfare policies so that states get to leverage their relative advantages to catch the fish instead of being fed.
11
-
dark-footage PoK also has its own space program, 50+ skyscrapers, 300 universities, 25k hospitals, 85 nuclear reactors, unicorn breeding farms, 80 lane highways, free healthcare, oil reserves, ocean facing properties, quantum computers, semiconductor fab, and rive Olympic villages. J&K are regretting the decision to stay with Endia. 🥲
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
11
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
10
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
9
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
8
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
@Ahmad-mf7yu some clarifications are in order:
1. My contention isn't primarily against Kashmir or Kashmiris, it is against the national narrative of the benefits of social spending. I hold similar views on my neighbouring states KL and TN, my own states insane policy of free bus rides for women, AAP's free electricity, BJP and Congress freebies and UP's free cycles/laptops. In a democracy, this is how conversation happens with states/identities becoming markers for policy/direction. Gujarat model/Kerala model, "South feeds, North breeds", Hillbilly middle America, Southern Italian Mafiosi politics, Finlandisation, Chinese Debt diplomacy, EU's Eurocentricism, Argentinian financial mismanagement, need any more examples?
2. Does the 10% expenditure include the defence budget? I am open to being corrected but I have not received a qualitative or quantitative argument. A defence expenditure barring infrastructure is state/region agnostic. There is no special division or equipment that is specific to the state or has a separate defence budgetary allocation. Therefore the expenditure is under the central list, it won't count in state allocation. If the army did build bunkers primarily with that money and let's charitably say that it took up 75%, it still means Kashmir got 2.5% of the budget for 1% population. (Btw, the last set of assumptions are overstated because check the erstwhile JKVAT/ today's GST collection and compare the special allocation history.).
3. Even assuming the charitable 2.5% spent on the 1% premise, look around and visualise the intensity of economic activity in the state. How many profitable industries are present, what is the turnover of the median business or even outliers, did you see the hustle of a Mumbai/Bengaluru/Chennai or even the Kerala style mega gold trade/private individual land deals(Crore plus deals in the 90's). The answer is no.
4. Much like the rest of India, the average state citizen overestimates the economic volume of the state. This is true for the "earning states" too. Kashmiri politicians much like the regional satrapy of the rest of India spent the money pulling people out of poverty and designed policies to have shadow businesses and offshore accounts. No state in India is swimming in money, but some get more than others and Kashmir has historically ranked very high on an absolute and per capita basis. Easy money has always led to progressive politics. Even Sikkim was the same, they currently have a demographic problem due to high rates of female empowerment.
5. I want financial infusion into Kashmir and other border states, but my only issue is the principle of reciprocation, will those states give back to South and West Indian states if and when there is a revenue downturn? Are they willing to accept periods of financial self reliance? I fear not in the case of Kashmir and certain NE states, their politics seem to operate in a premise of a conditional union with India for financial gain. If there is a change like we saw with Assam and Sikkim, there was no need for this wall of text.
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
7
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
Unless AAP re-orients to a pro business governence model(as opposed to social democrat model), Punjab nightmare starts. I am not too optimistic.
Here are the challenges:
1. Declining farm yields: a primarily agricultural society with very little scope for industrialisation. Unsustainable agricultural practices will continue till there is desertification. AAP has made a Faustian bargain with the agricultural elites and social movements.
2. Borrowed voter base: AAP is not going to fundamentally change the nature of Punjab politics with its "anti corruption" agenda. If anything this is where their model breaks and they will have to pander to the borrowed voter bases. They have little to none when it comes to organic leaders. Don't be surprised if there are multiple CMs, Party hopping and horse trading in the next 5 years.
3. Brand of politics and death of ideology: I think AAP won the wrong state and won it too soon. For the sake of AAP, i had hoped it had been a (with all due respect) low profile state like HP. Goa or a UT. Punjabi politics is a minefield with religious tensions(Sikh vs Christian is coming up for which SAD will be blamed like BJP is for Hindu-Muslim tensions), unstable overexposed border with Pakistan and a declining society(talent flight, declining wealth and social strife). At best, AAP is the Neo Congress. At worst, it will shatter the image and goodwill it built up from within(if so, get ready for Samajwadi AAP, AAP(A), AAP(S), Khaas Aadmi Party.)
4. Industrialize or else: an absolute impossibility under the conditions and platform AAP has won, the obsession AAP has with Nordic social democracy is going to be detrimental. When you give middle class kids education, they want white collar jobs. Enterpreneurship for students(very important qualifier) works only when there is an existing industrial base ie you should have a slowing govt fuelled behemoth like IBM for a Steve jobs and Bill gates to poach talent and make their own companies. Their policies are suited to developed economies than developing ones. Increasing expectations of masses will lead to further talent flight.
________________
I sincerely hope i am wrong, but the indicators are not looking good. Visit this comment in 5-10 years to mock me if I go wrong but I don't think that will be the case.
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
6
-
5
-
Yes. The narrative is mostly BS.
1. People forget Hindutva had a presence in Karnataka even before independence. North Karnataka had presence of RSS in the 20's, Jayachamarajendra Wodeyar of Mysore Kingdom (of IISc, HAL, Co funding BHU, First electrification project in India fame) was a founder member of VHP and its first president. Even the BJP won 18 seats in Karnataka in 1983 before the Lingayats made it their base party.
2. There is a huge rise in social consciousness of Hindutva particularly after the Tippu Jayanti fiasco. While money definitely played a part in "Operation Lotus", a majority of the people who jumped ship from Congress and JD(S) to BJP were pro Hindu section of Congress who belonged to the Lingayats, middle and lower castes.
3. The movement has consolidated support to the point, that the JD(S), a caste party has a massive chunk of its youth supporting the BJP. The elders vote JD(S) and the young vary between "JDs for the district, BJP for the center" to a complete switch over.
4. Most of the political switch is largely due to the insistence of Congress to be pro minorities. Socially, Karnataka is Hindutva heartland. That is why you see the likes of Vikram Sampath, Amit Malviya and Nalin Kumar Kateel.
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
@TeluguBusinessChannel ugh. You think everyone looks the same and speaks the same language in East Asia.
Here are some Google searches to help you: Dakkani(no hindi in south India?), Sanskritic grammar of Indian languages, language families in China, four occupations caste system, Burakumin,Korean caste system, Buddhism vs Confucianism in China, sinitic languages, Tibeto Burmese vs Tibeto Sinitic, people groups in china, Mandarin vs Cantonese culture, religion in East Asia.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
@orkkojit 1. I don't think people today realise how rare meat was, in the post agrarian to pre industrial phases. Most people have universalised the history of North Western Europe which had negligible agriculture. Everyone ate meat but not at the rate we do today. A good rule of thumb is if your hyper local festival has a harvest/communal festival with sacrifice, meat was historically rare.(Eid, Chhat, Ugadi). If your festival has dietary restriction, meat was the norm(Lent).
2. Several misconceptions on chicken, it's likely that Hiuen Tsang was referring to local fowl, not chicken. The cheap and ubiquitous chicken and eggs we eat today are a product of the broiler revolution in the 30's and reached India in the 70's(silver revolution). We did not have organised and centralised poultry only domestication and hunting. Chickens used to weigh less than a kilogram, were bottom feeders eating bamboo shoots and worms. They were worse than pork. There was significant historical stigma attached to the bird because it was used for cock fights.
2. From the traditional history, the Bengali diet was much like its historical origin in the Shakta belt of the subcontinent(MP, MH to Southern Karnataka, Bengal was settled very late in history), vegetarian and for the most part(tribal pescatarianism seeped in as with any riverian/coastal practice), red meat was strictly ritualistic. During the harvest festival, human sacrifice was the initial practice, substituted by buff/venison, later by goats and fowl. Chicken entered very recently during the secularisation of the Pujo.
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
Add:
1. Trade networks/FTAs(container ships that run regardless of cargo like China and Japan have with the US, Singapore with SEA and EU's FTZ.
2. Talent in the lower end: we don't have a corpus of experienced and talented electricians to solder, assemble and repair. Taiwan, Korea, Germany, China and Japan have a huge corpus of non engineering talent that has a high degree of application, can manage labour and even hold patents. Try hiring 2500 electricians/woodworkers who can deal with 10 different product lines or even a team of foremen who can manage, analyse and adapt to market needs even in Coimbatore, Bengaluru, Hosur or Chennai(the most industrialised area in our country).
Focusing on R&D is hopeless in our country when we don't have an industrial base to support it and most importantly we lack respect to discern the concept and the product. The inventor will move to the US, where he will find mentors, people willing to burn cash, supply chain analysts and instrumentation engineers who can effectively start a company in a week, source raw material in months from Singapore and set up a working facility in China/Taiwan in three to six months.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
@ayushacharya972 oh! It ij bhut the greatest place in India. I live ther. We run a Kropotkin themed groshary/rebhtaurant called "Conquest of the bhaat". It's full of hangry peophals who might get chance to eeht iph they teall us how many revolutions they had.
We hab 100% mhud rods. Koncrete on for bankars, ok? We hab radio to leesten to obhar Chieunez Komrades.
We have even Dasz international institute, not 10 but Dasz as in "Dasz international" bhere we teech grasroot skeels. Hard skeels like railbadi, that ij hob to derail train, then be habe tie up bith Columbia, not University the kaantry to teech pedalling. Don't pheel bad iph you pheel kourse is komplitake. Be habe tie uhp bith jadabpur, Kolkata and JNU phor sopt skeels like protest organijing, chakka jaam skeels, Urdu Naarebaaji.
Eu shud kham heer phor libarashan prom Capital. Be habe many pepul who come pram international kaantriej like Myanmar, China, Bangladez and Orissa.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
I hate this simplistic narrative.
1. Vegetarianism is caste agnostic: it has to do with regional traditions. For instance in Karnataka, the Halmadi (translates quite literally to milk-avoidant/restricted and are vegans) and Urs(the royal family of Mysore) are both lower castes. While costal Brahmin communities particularly from Kashmiri heritage like GSB consume meat and fish as they are from Shakta traditions. You can find non vegetarianism in upper castes where ever there is a prominence of Shakta tradition. (Kashmir, Assam, Karnataka, Odisha and even pockets of Kerala).
2. Meat eating is an outside influence: This holds true only for Western India. The dominant Smriti for the traditions in West India is Parashara Smriti not Manusmriti. That is the reason a majority of people groups and castes are vegetarian.
3. Hindutva is pro vegetarianism: Somehow, we are asked to accept there is nuance to the Left(CPI-M and CPI- ML are polar opposites) Liberals(Welfarist and Globalists are opposites) but the same cannot be afforded to right wing. Why?
There is a lot of silent as well as historical conversation on the right wing on vegetarianism. For instance, Savarkar himself advocated for eating meat as a prequisite for Hindus joining the erstwhile British Indian armed forces. There are a lot of Shaktas in the right wing who want revival of the sacrificial ceremonies.
4. Right wing wants complete ban on meat: There is intentional amplification of the pro vegetarian voices, then the same is used to showcase the "hypocricy" "double standards" of people on right wing. One thing that Shaktas also believe in is the abstainence of "secular"(as in nothing to do with religion) meat consumption during festivals(only sacrificial meat is to be consumed if any). So when there is a protest asking for closure of shops and restiction of non vegetarian food during festivals, the ask across the board(vegetarian and non vegetarian Hindus) is to restrict secular display and consumption as has been the social norm for centuries.
5. Hinduism prioritizes vegetarians: the standard archetype of diet is the 3 fold. Tamasic, Rajasic and Satvik. It's pretty clear both from texts as well as practice that on the social level, there is meant to be balance of people following the three diets with the Tamasic for the commoners, Rajasic for the rulers and Satvik for the spiritual. That is why you find what is today called "Non-hindu" traditions/communities of India which have a spiritual inclination to be vegetarian be it Veerashaiva/Lingayats or Jains. While Shaktas are Tamasic because their traditions are hyperlocal common man traditions irrespective of caste, that is why Shakta Brahmins are meat eaters and worshippers of hyperlocalized deities.
The issue of hierarchy starts with the formation of one size fits all versions of Hinduism from within like Arya Samaj and Brahmo samaj which adopt the structure and issues of Protestant Christianity. Do recall that there is a major split within Arya Samaj in 1893 on the same issue. This vegetarianism debate has much to do with reformism than politics.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@amitpathak3279 Maybe you don't understand the story, so let me explain: 1. Rajan is a market capitalist, a proponent of the market as a perfect mechanism, advocate of supply side economics, anti stimulus (no money printing) and anti inflation camps. These were republican platforms and positions in his day(today libertarian). He made his career opposing Greenspan who introduced Quantitative easing in the west. If he was true to his positions, he'd have resigned from his advisory posts in the UPA-1 and UPA-2. While he was an advisor, MMS broke every rule in RR's manual in response to the 2008 crash. They printed money thrice, spent the rest of the tenure handing out money to the poor aka demand side economics for votes(MNREGA and fuel subsidy), destroyed market mechanisms in rural India(when everything rural was subsidised by the state) and oversaw growth by inflation.
2. When the chickens started coming home to roost in 2011-14 and the printed largesse was depleted, he took over crisis-ridden RBI in 2013. There was an excess supply of money which required a response on the interest rate front. Him and Chidambaram tried to steady the ship by hiking interest rates while trying to keep state institutions afloat(FCI, bad debt-ridden state owned banks and non Navaratna state companies) because disinvestment before elections would have been disastrous.
2. By 2014, money supply was in a critical state and RR remembered his academic positions. He kept the interest rates high and did everything to stop additional borrowing while BJP was hamstrung by previous commitments. I'd have no problem with the guy if he kept to this but he kept on giving statements against the government. The government was declined capital infusion to deal with legitimate crises. The best part is his duplicity in his academic work and public statements. His 2019 essay lists the inherited situation and his 2020 statement blames "political and social agenda" for lack of growth. This is like your bank manager calling up kids to tell them that their father does not buy them gifts because he doesn't like them while using his role at the bank, asking the father to pay back more.
3. I laughed hard at his answers on the challenges for the MSME sector, his policy and position are a part of the problem. India's elite like Sen(the best philosophical argument against reservation), RR and even Bhagwati love to roleplay conservatives positions outside of India but validate Congress or Communist stances that goes against their public and academic stances.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@sajeevramakrishnan1408 the answers do not lie in democracy or making education an electoral issue. I will cover in point 2.
1. I authored and headed a study for a multinational consulting firm in 2011 on the education system(not in public domain). Nothing has changed. I want to be specific when I say "literacy crisis among the educated". Literacy is the ability to count, write, read, communicate and function in society. We found the majority of the graduates(age profile:15-20) in upper class/caste metropolitan middle income families do not know how to write a formal letter, lack public speaking skills, read a 200 page book cover to cover or even open a bank account by themselves. Just to be clear, I am talking about the 5% income tax paying class not rural kids. This is the state of our education system. Will increasing the number of underprivileged into this funnel help them or harm then?
2. No democracy due to structural implication is good at generating width markers sustainably by itself but can create depth markers.(A government can fund research to create a hundred patent holders(depth) but it is not good at applying the patents to create a product(say iPhone) and distribute it to millions without the private sector). Where the government takes part in width markers, it is prone to inefficiency, exclusion and failure in the long run(PDS, healthcare and any function of welfare state). Any politics played on this issue will lead to a welfare burden. The remedy lies in govt stepping back on width markers for the private sector(logistics in Indian PDS is handled by the private sector) and civic society (UIDAI/Aadhar is a government body manned by civic society) or at the very least offer total autonomy to the function(IITs).
India has to focus on enabling rather than implementation and focus on the median rather than the outliers. It should focus on getting low level industrial work like ceramics, plastics and assembly into the country. This job can be manned by people without an education. Japan, Korea and China started with these sectors and moved up the value chain over time. That will allow us to buy 10-15 years and significant capital/revenue to create specialization.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@IndiaAgainstSlaveryIAS reply is basically Indian politics imprinted on other nations. That isn't how politics or business works.
1. Only the Indians have an existential fear of causing damage abroad as we have been taught Gandhian philosophy which isn't Indian to begin with. The others suffer no fools. Ex: France still has a colonial Empire as we speak in 2023, it's central bank prints African money and it's longest border isn't with Germany, it's Brazil. France gets a lot of "drama" for it, but they will retain them so long as their interests demand them to.
2. As for the business and governmental outlook on investments, no country or business entity looks at social discord. Israel is a research hub, start up generator and the most productive industrial base in the Middle East while being in the middle of a warzone. Sweden, the poster child of progressive politics is receiving more investments even while they handle communal rioting, bomb blasts and no go ghettos of Muslim migrants, Mexico has been the largest recipient of American investment for friend-shoring(Not Vietnam)even as the cartel war rages on post el Chapo's arrest(Google Culiacán). I am not sure why we stand out here, it's not even a tenth of the violence in these countries.
3. The impetus for withdrawal from China was the geopolitical moves that threaten the US hegemony. Semiconductor acquisition and attempts to de-dollarise oil trade. No one withdrew investments because of Xinjiang, Ladakh or even causing Covid.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@lohitroy5938 The issue is representing a part of the process as the whole of it. Tbf, all sides of the aisle engage in it. On why this is insufficient, let me explain with an analogy. the actor picking up the name Dilip Kumar isn't Hindufication(what I write next is about the process not what the individual should have done or made to do), the change needs to meet other criterion like voluntary partaking in Hindu festivities/activities, adoption of Hindu philosophical or theological axioms that may be counterintuitive to Islam or absent from it; adoption of social norms like dietary standards; mutual acceptance of the change by sections of society. Sanskritisation is often used as the imposition, placation or voluntary subjugation to a Sanskritic nomenclature, which isn't the case with the works of MN Srinivas(I happen to be a distant relative and have met him in person) or later academics.
2. Will try and read the paper(?) you mentioned. Please name the authors if possible.
3. I was merely confirming the standard of evidence. I am surprised you counted a contiguous thread as three, as distinct sources, the way I counted the three distinct threads are: one coming from his own family which doesn't have or like association with Brahmins, one by his biographer and another recorded instance of him mentioning it, recorded in early Ambedkarite literature. I think this is as good as it gets when it comes to an evidentiary standard. I am even affording you the rather proposterous idea of disregarding local information.
4. Your methodological critique isn't exactly suited for Indian history because of where we find ourselves. Treat history like a forest of competing plant species. With European history they had hundreds of species of historians who always relied on local information, hearsay and mythology as the initial root. They built their own narratives, won some debates and lost some, developed tools, theories and epistemologies. The forest has grown in height with just a dozen survivors but the outcome of this is a refinement that was never seen in any age.
With India, we don't have a forest, we have a singular tree of Nehruvian history and a vine of Ambedkarite history. The Nehruvian tree used state control to kill any competing threads using the imported methodological tools and ruse of evidentiary standards. We need Hindutva history, Jain History, Tamil history, Kannada history, Sanskrit history, trad history, casteist history, racist history and any other forms for us to have a forest. It's shocking to learn that everything we know in the Indian academia and society comes from less than 200-300 translated Indian works when Sanskrit alone has a estimated library of a million distinct works that have gone untranslated.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@anshuraj4277
"I would say we have here in this policy and program a synthesis of what modern Europe calls Socialism and Fascism. We have here the justice, the equality, the love, which is the basis of Socialism, and combined with that we have the efficiency and the discipline of Fascism as it stands in Europe" - April 15th, 1931. Inaugural speech as the Mayor of Calcutta
"Indian politics must have an authoritarian character. ... To repeat once again, our philosophy should be a synthesis between National Socialism and Communism," November 2, 1944. Tokyo University.
"So long as there is a third party, ie the British, these dissensions will not end. These will go on growing. They will disappear only when an iron dictator rules over India for 20 years. For a few years at least, after the end of British rule in India, there must be a dictatorship...No other constitution can flourish in this country and it is so to India's good that she shall be ruled by a dictator, to begin with." - Singapore Daily 1944
These quotes are from Bose himself. Fascism was admired by groups seeking Independance from colonialism and did not carry the stigma it does post WW2. No member of RSS let alone right wing in India is beholden to the ideas or Zeitgeist of the past.
If fascism is the ultimate objective, 7 years is sufficient time to impliment it. They have not. It seems only select liberal heroes are exempt from the critique and context.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@MM-ue4ol
1. There seems to be issues with comprehension when one cannot discern between an observation and proposal. Read the same point again. I have issues with "social progress" as much as I have with chewing gum before removing the wrapper(sequence matters).
2. Chaebol in Korea, Zaibatsu in Japan.
3. Lol set up a strawman and then defend it. I used Engels of all people to explain that it's not trickle down economics. We are not discussing taxing the rich(subject matter of trickledown economics), it's about how industrialisation creates real world specialization leading to product, old money and breaking of social structure. (All Marxist ideas btw)
4. Feudalism- Mercantalism- Capitalism- Socialism- Communism. This is the established progression within academia and social sciences since Marx.
Presence of money or trade does not make a feudal society capitalistic. Similarly, the presence of social schemes does not make a capitalistic country into a socialistic one. There is no pure capitalism, socialism or communism anywhere in the world but there is an operating norm. Going by the harebrained "feudal society had industries", look up what industrialisation means. If we still go by your framing India was industrialized at least 3000 years ago.
5. This is called Protestant historiography aka viewing the world as a permanent struggle between powers that be and the people resulting in slow ascent of liberalism.
If that was the case, the difference between isolated Sentinelese tribe and the west is ability to protest and engage in social reform. It's the combination of resources, technology and finally access. Tomorrow if civilization collapsed, women rights would suffer the most because we would not have the first 2 preconditions to provide access. no amount of protesting or social movements would bring back women's rights. it's the function that dictates the form, not the other way around.
6. You have successfully demonstrated you have no idea what industrial revolution was. The only reason the technology became viable is because it was for the first time in history, economically viable.
7. Again, you cannot discern between an observation and proposal? If you can't please present me how you plan to supercede the developmental stage?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@gireeshgprasad7589 5. The states mentioned in OC have severe revenue deficits. A simple perusal of the numbers will confirm it. NIc websites are a good source to confirm it. These states are not being given extra, though their policy choices are condemnable in cases such as farm loan waivers.
6. I don't understand the framing here, the point is not that retention of resources, capital and people automatically leads to outcomes. It is addressing a charged narrative in "earning" states, that they alone are responsible for the generation and association with India loses them money. I am pointing to the same thing you are but with a critical difference, in the FEP era, octroi and inter state taxes were not charged. That is why erstwhile BH, MP and OR were revenue deficit states which is mentioned in every paper on FEP.
8. The only interstate competition that existed pre 2000s is for central institutes and funds. Today, Hyderabad and Noida compete with Bengaluru for BPO and IT. PB, KA and MH compete for biotech and even in the newscycle there was considerable competition for both Tesla plant and Semiconductor Fabs. Also see the microtrends for Textiles(KA and AP competing with TN and GJ), minerals (Borkaro expansion, Vedanta plants), Agro industries and Agro FMCG(moving from GJ, TN, MH and WB to UP and HR with Gurugram emerging as a major center for factories and logistics.) These industries are moving to areas where agriculture and mining are happening.
1
-
@gireeshgprasad7589 Hey Gireesh! Always a good conversation with you around. (Why does YT block my replies when they get too long, how does one circumvent it? 😂)
1&3. When I use the strong choice of a word "choose", it's more of a compatibilist view. Serendipity, history, geography and other factors were undoubtedly the genesis of the advantage. To accentuate it with policy, ancillary institutions, facilities and infrastructure was the "government choice". Examples: Mumbai got RBI, SEBI, NABARD which sealed its status as the financial capital. Chennai got India's first dedicated Industrial estate in the late 50's at Guindy after many industries propped up. Bengaluru got various central research institutes, the 1985 policy which provisioned software export via satellites.
2. FEP concentrated industries and institutions to two cities, Mumbai and Chennai and none of the coastal states generated industries directly from the policy. Chennai was specifically prioritised over Kolkata in this case despite being older. Capex happened regularly under Nehru, Desai, IG until Rajiv with central funding while Haldia was inaugurated after a full 25 years of FEP. in this case, it was a clear act of planned and implemented prioritisation. Post policy, we actually witnessed the total collapse of the Kolkata-Myanmar, Kerala/Karnataka-Arab and Gujarat-Arab maritime routes.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Nubbdy 1. I am not familiar with alcohol as an offering, but I presume there is sanction for it within the Shakta agamas. Bengal is not unique in the sense, even the temple of my family deity(Mylar Lingeshwara) in North Karnataka is offered both marijuana as well as alcohol. I have seen this at several temples of Karnataka, Maharashtra and even Kal Bhairav temple at Ujjain aside from my encounters with it in Bengal. I will ask around and reply if i find some information on this.
However I do know this part that the much of the Bengali practice today is heavily corrupted even as far as 50 years ago. For example, the pandals(not the temples) serve chicken and other meats. In the tradition, only the sacrificed meat is to be served and other meats are not a part of it. Only fish, goat and buffalo(afaik) are to be presented as sacrifice. The current practice stems from the "secularisation" of Pujo which is now more of a cultural and a community/socio-political event than a religious or spiritual one. This informs people of "how liberal our religion is".
2. Mahua did not say that but her worldview is at the root of the statement. For example, the poster had no alcohol in it, it had Kali smoking a blunt(?)/cigarette(?). She infused alcohol into the picture, despite that never being part of the poster. So what is the implication? Cigarette/blunt is ok as Devi even accepts alcohol?
Just to be clear, it's who is speaking and the context to which it was responded to, that is the problem. Ersatz second rate idea of liberalism.
The stoner vs shaman/sadhu is a good framework to understand why there is an issue here. Non-Western ideas of divinity is not a carte blanche. Have you heard of any anti-theists turning up at Catholic churches to have a wine party because wine is acceptable in the tradition? A decent amount of non religious like me would view this as unnecessary provocation.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@SoumitraKhirpai 7. This leads to two types of start ups we get to see in India, low profit overcharging, gimmicky, marketing based, generic companies(organic food, niche textiles) or inexperienced copied tech which ctrl c+v foreign models like Zomato, Ola and the likes. There is not a single business model/sector that India generates and world copies.
8. There is no respect for the process of death of companies. The talent base for Apple, Microsoft were built on the decaying parts of IBM and their decaying businesses in turn fed Alphabet(Google), Amazon, FB and other tech giants. Tesla built on the inactive patents of NASA and dying American automobile sector. Netflix was built on a massive pile of rejected Hollywood scripts. One visionary ubermensch does not create a company, it requires a talent base of experienced SMEs, middle managers and directors.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@rishabhkhatri 6.This leads to two types of start ups we get to see in India, low profit overcharging, gimmicky, marketing based, generic companies(organic food, niche textiles) or inexperienced copied tech which ctrl c+v foreign models like Zomato, Ola and the likes. There is not a single business model/sector that India generates and world copies.
7. There is no respect for the process of death of companies. The talent base for Apple, Microsoft were built on the decaying parts of IBM and their decaying businesses in turn fed Alphabet(Google), Amazon, FB and other tech giants. Tesla built on the inactive patents of NASA and dying American automobile sector. Netflix was built on a massive pile of rejected Hollywood scripts. One visionary ubermensch does not create a company, it requires a talent base of experienced SMEs, middle managers and directors.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Pierre In
1. I never used the word fascist in my replies to you. I merely asked if Mudi ze can do it too as the event is being interpreted from the axiom of legality. No need for the facade of democracy as we have a perfectly legal way to retain power.
2. Your narrative of the emergency would be believed if one were not from this country or was unaware of Indian politics. If it was anti RSS and anti judicial takeover by RSS, why did the government preemptively jail the socialists and dissident sections of CPI-M, many of whom are still anti RSS like Karat, Pinarayi Vijayan and Yechury?
3. I am not doubting the validity of the colloquial phrase "follow the constitution", just pointing to lack of context when it's speciously used against the BJP which perfectly sums up the opposition. There isn't any criticism, they'd have done the same things.
4. You doubted the existence of the phrase "legal misnomer", perfectly fine till I provided you with the means to search for its usage. Not being able to acknowledge the width of its usage across literature, media, academia and case law is just pedantry for the sake of distraction. It's not 10 people who randomly used it, it's the 100+ academic papers (available on Google scholar) from fields as diverse as geopolitics to sociology to taxation to climate studies that have used it. 5 separate legal systems have judgements that use the phrase. Google Books lists hundreds of works(you were right, found an instance going back to 1927). And still you want some link to a dictionary to be convinced. Anyone reading this can tell, you don't want to be convinced.
5. I never initiated this party trick, you latched on to a phrase to disqualify my opinion and all that talk of aukat came back to bite you.
1
-
1
-
1
-
@Pierre In if you are looking for paper titled "legal misnomer" then you are not going to find one. I didn't find a paper titled "raining cats and dogs", which is unscientific, how can animals condense and fall back on earth?
If you were talking about usage, then I don't think you want to put in the effort, when the phrase was used with quotation on stor with J, there are 7 papers that use it explicitly, with 2 additional papers citing a statement with that phrase. Google scholar lists at least a hundred instances of usage in academic papers.
I am pretty surprised livelaw does not show a single case tbh, but good news. Indian kanoon has 5 confirmed instances where this phrase has been used. Oldest usage is the year 2000, Narinder Kaur & anr vs Amar Jeet Singh Sethi.
So yes, "legal misnomer" is a phrase. I thought you had a poor grip on politics and society. The problem seems to be deeper, bud.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1