Comments by "Jessica" (@jayjaydubful) on "How To Get Rich" video.

No one is saying that trana people are stopping them being rich (except maybe people like female sport women who have had prizes, scholarships & careers denied them). However some people (pharmaceutical companies, surgeons for example) are getting very rich on the back of gender ideology. Please don't denigrate people addressing real issues by disingenuous linking discussion points that don't go together while dismissing concerns. Read the Cass report to start with.
64
@Mock_Turtle_1805 I've tried replying to you twice and both times it's got deleted
4
@Mock_Turtle_1805 so you're happy to disregard profound harms to children and vulnerable adults, breakdowns in safeguarding practices, breakdowns in women & gay rights, contamination of data, restrictions on free speech, huge profiteering on the back of a pseudo religious ideology on the basis that it's a 'culture war'? Then you're the one engaging in a culture war. For me this is a non partisan issue
1
So you're disregarding huge profiteering from the state enabled harm of chiIdren & vuInerable adults, the breakdowns of s@feguarding, of women's & gay rights, of the restrictions on free spe3ch - because it's apparently a 'culture war'? Calling real concerns silly names like 'culture war' is how people get shut down. It's your culture war, not mine. To me, all of those things are non partisan & in fact I used to think they were all left wing principles.
1
@RichTapestry writing lies doesn't make it true. I don't think you know the first thing about the Cass review. Try reading it
1
@RichTapestry I actually don't believe you have read it. One of the most eminent pediatricians & he'd team carried out a digournous, extensive review of all the reputable peer reviewed studies and carried out thousands of interviews with relevant stakeholders meanwhile a few lobbying organisations drowned in ideology and with vested interests have tried to concoct reasons for her being wrong in some way. It's pathetic & reprehensible
1
@RichTapestry the Cass review looks at this in depth. There is no evidence of su1cide risks from not enabling medical 'transition'. This is harmful propaganda to emotionally blackmail and it creates risks, as telling a group they are at higher risk creates higher risk. However there IS evidence of higher risk of su1cide POST 'transition', after an initial honeymoon period. Break out of the conditioning and use your brain. It's a construct - there is no 'male or female brain' separate from a body. Our sex is innate, unchangeable but does not define our personalities. Gender is just sexist stereotypes
1
@RichTapestry @RichTapestry the Cass review looks at this in depth. There is no evidence of su1cide risks from not enabling medical 'transition'. This is harmful propaganda to emotionally blackmail and it creates risks, as telling a group they are at higher risk creates higher risk. However there IS evidence of higher risk of su1cide POST 'transition', after an initial honeymoon period. Break out of the conditioning and use your brain. It's a construct - there is no 'male or female brain' separate from a body. Our sex is innate, unchangeable but does not define our personalities. Gender is just sexist stereotypes
1