Comments by "Taint ABird" (@taintabird23) on "DW News" channel.

  1. 3
  2. 3
  3. 3
  4. 3
  5. 3
  6. 3
  7. 3
  8. 3
  9. 2
  10. 2
  11. 2
  12. 2
  13.  @eb6303  'An island which speaks the same language from North to South, but still manages to have its oppositions on a relatively small area: the entire island of Ireland North + South is 84,421 km2 and doesn't even manage to feel united... But we're going to be united in a EU of 4 476 000 км² with dozen of diferent languages, different religions, and identities... Interesting.' Wow! Nice touch of Gallic arrogance there - I won't be accusing you knowing too much about the subject that is for sure. How could you not know the problem in Northern ireland revolves around two identity groups contesting over the same territory? Unionists in Northern Ireland have a British identity. The rest of us have an Irish identity. The reason Ireland speaks English is because of colonisation and the Unionists are the last vestige of the colonisers. The peace process in Northern Ireland was founded on the notion that people can identify and as Irish or British, or Irish and British but would share an overarching European Union identity built on shared values. That was working - a younger generation was breaking down barriers with their peers - until Brexit disrupted the process, Brexit forces people to choose a side. The EU membership of Ireland and the UK was the cornerstone of the entire project, now one party is gone. Your post is an example of what happens when you start with a conclusion and work backwards. Who is seeking a 'Celtic unity'? I have no idea what you are talking about there.
    2
  14. 2
  15. 2
  16. 2
  17. 2
  18. 2
  19. Oh but self-assessment of your abilities is no assessment at all - and is certainly no substitute for rational debate. I lived on the border for years - what are your qualifications? The mendacity of Brexit is that it promised to take control of the UKs borders and controls on the British border in Ireland undermines the GFA. It also shows bad faith to the nationalist population of NI. It is possible that this was an incompetent oversight, or perhaps Brexiters arrogantly assumed the Irish would simply 'know their place' and leave the EU with the UK. In any case, to overcome the problem the UK simply declared that it will not put up any border, placing all the pressure on Ireland to accommodate a British policy it never voted for and for which there is no majority on the island of Ireland. Democracy? Sovereignty? It only applies to the English, apparently. The Irish have said they will not do it. It will be political suicide for any Irish government and has the potential to destabilize the whole island, economically and politically. [It has already put the divisive issue of Irish unity to the forefront of political debate long before it needed to be ] The Irish government has a responsibility to Irish nationalists in NI. Perhaps then the UK assumed that Ireland would put up a customs border with the EU, or vice versa. This is not politically or economically acceptable for Ireland either, despite your fact-free claim that Ireland not putting up a border on the island will be 'no problem'. The EU seem determined not to disadvantage Ireland because the circus in Britain. The solution is being negotiated presently. One assumption is that any hard border in Ireland will be temporary as the UK will soon be back to the negotiating table once the reality of a hard Brexit become apparent to the non-millionaires supporting it. In any case, on the island of Ireland everyone knows where the responsibility this situation lies despite the cognitive dissonance rampant across the Irish Sea. Meanwhile, Irish people are being lectured on the border in Ireland by people on the neighbouring island who can't even spell the word....
    2
  20.  flip inheck  'It is a historical fact that Ireland (Free State) left the UK creating the partition, your ignorance of historical fact is obvious' You owe Bush Ranger and apology. Partition took place on 3 May 1921 under the Government of Ireland Act 1920. The smaller of the two, Northern Ireland, was duly created with a devolved administration and forms part of the United Kingdom today, but the larger one, intended as a home rule jurisdiction to be known as Southern Ireland, failed to gain acceptance. The territory instead became independent and is now a sovereign state also named Ireland and additionally described as the Republic of Ireland. The Act of 1920 was intended to create two self-governing territories within Ireland, with both remaining within the United Kingdom. It also contained provisions for co-operation between the two territories and for the eventual reunification of Ireland. However, in 1922, following the War of Independence (1919–1921) and the Anglo-Irish Treaty, the southern and western part became the Irish Free State, while Northern Ireland exercised its option to remain in the United Kingdom. Therefore, partition occurred before the creation of the Irish Free State. Incidentally, Irish nationalists were not consulted on partition or the Government of Ireland Act, 1920. The British government only consulted Ulster Unionists who took the opportunity to abandon their brethren in Donegal, Cavan and Monaghan in order to ensure a larger Protestant majority in their truncated province.
    2
  21. 2
  22. 2
  23. 2
  24. 2
  25. 2
  26. 2
  27. 2
  28. 2
  29. 2
  30. 2
  31. @ P S Who is going to erect a hard border. Both Ireland and UK will have to erect a hard border. Ireland will erect a hard border to protect the Single Market, the UK will be required to deploy checks for WTO purposes. Another hard border will be erected by the UKs denial of Irish identity and the EU rights of Irish citizens in NI in contravention of Article 1 (vi) of the Belfast Agreement. The UK has provided no solutions to this problem either. Dissident IRA have already set off a bomb in County Fermanagh this week (Fermanagh is on the border) and so armed security will in due course be returning to the border. I told you that there is a diminishing UK demos - what part of that do you not understand?. Most Leave voters are English and identified as such in the 2011 census, or as English first and British second. There is a direct co-relation between the pattern of leave voters and the expression of English identity in the 2011 Census. Brexiters don’t care about the UK, and we know from recent polls of members of the Tory party that they want Brexit more that they want to maintain the United Kingdom. The only reason the backstop is an issue is because the Tories are stuck depending on the DUP to keep Corbyn out of power. Brexit is a product of an English identity crisis and a Tory party at war with itself. Both the Scots and Northern Irish voted to remain and the fact that they are leaving is indicative of a democratic deficit in a union that is no longer fit for purpose. Therefore, your comment, is disingenuous. Texas is not at all like NI, it is true, but neither is any other part of the UK for that matter. NI can vote to leave the UK at any time and its citizens are entitled to plural identities. The citizens of say, Somerset, do not have this right and cannot claim an identity that is Irish, British, both or neither. You have never read the Belfast Agreement, and neither have your Brexiter leaders. The EU is mentioned in relation to the development of cross border relationships, their funding etc, in relation to Strand Two. These cross border relationship (Agriculture, Education, Transport, Environment, Waterways, Social Welfare, Tourism, Inland Fisheries, Aquaculture, Health and Urban development) will be disrupted or halted as the UK will be outside the EU. This is significant for the island of Ireland. The people of NI did not vote for this. While Northern Ireland remains part of the UK, the BA states that no changes to status of NI can be carried out unless the people NI vote for it. NI nationalists did not vote to lose their EU rights that come with their Irish identity which they are permitted to have under the Belfast Agreement. So, your argument is baseless and pointless.
    2
  32. 2
  33. 2
  34. 2
  35. 2
  36. 2
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. @ Charlie No it is not. Some Scots hate the English, who utterly dominate them. Who else do they hate? Nobody. Irish and English friends in Scotland have told me stories about the hostility some Scots have for the English, and both have found it shocking. It is not something you would ever see in Ireland, not since it took its place among the nations of the world, although some English I find on this media insist I that I hate them because the are English - or more accurately, because I am Irish. The English also insist on speaking on behalf of the various Celtic nations, claim to know what is best for them - your statement that the Scots 'wrapping themselves up in an EU blanket won't make them feel any better' indicates that tradition is still alive in you. In my opinion, it also points to your insecurity - the English still need the Celtic nations in order to feel secure in their identity. This will change over time. English nationalism is still in at nascent stage, and it is relatively incoherent. It make sense to me that you should be confident as the world is full of Englishness: football, rugby, cricket, the English language, Common law etc. English culture is everywhere and is easily identifiable, a product of an imperialism that was a vehicle for English nationalism for hundreds of years. And yet Brexiters still feel that the EU threatens their identity. This is because the post-Imperial English are still trying to find their place in the world. Irish identity and culture has thrived and its nationalism has matured since joining the EU, in a large measure because it is not dominated by England to the same extend anymore. Irish people are also more confident than they used to be, as we have an equal voice in the EU, unlike the experience of the Union Ireland left in 1922. In short, membership of the EU has done more for Irish identity than independent isolation did previously. The Scots understand this, and the English fear it. This brings me back to a point I've made before. The real problem the English have with the EU is the equality that it offers. The English don't feel equal to anyone, they feel they are exceptional because of what they achieved in the past and this is a reliable indicator of can be achieved in the future. They want exceptions to be made for them as they are particularly special. You can see it clearly in the Brexit 'negotiation strategy' of the UK government, UKIP and the like. You are right, Brexit is the least of the EUs problems, and I think that overlooking that has been a strategic error of the exit strategy. 'They need us more than we need them' has proven to be an unreliable hook to hang the Brexit strategy on. British Eurosceptics have been predicting the end of the EU since they joined in 1973. It won't happen, it will merely continue to evolve. Can the same be said for the UK? That remains to be seen.
    2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2