Comments by "Taint ABird" (@taintabird23) on "Post-Brexit border reignites tensions in Northern Ireland | Focus on Europe" video.
-
7
-
4
-
4
-
@markaxworthy2508 It is covered by the GFA, it is the whole point of one of the strands of the relationships outlined in it. One of the roles of Dublin is to use its position to represent the best interests of Irish nationalists with London. Unionists would not trust Dublin to represent their interests with London, and why would they? They view the Irish as the cause of all their problems through existing. See the strand that deals with Dublin -London relationships (east-west I think it is called in the agreement). I think it is strand 3.
It is difficult to see how how Dublin and Brussels could have saved the DUP from themselves when they explicitly sought the hardest of hard Brexits, a view that was not in keeping with the majority - NI voted to remain after all. Remember, the DUP did not support the backstop, which would have avoided all of this nonsense. They never supported the GFA either, but its the agreement that is saving them from being abandoned by London.
I guarantee you Dublin did not 'forget' the unionists. We watched them, awestruck, as they continued to dig a deeper hole for themselves and increased their hostility towards Dublin for having the cheek to defend the open border in Ireland. They provided confidence and supply to the May government and enjoyed their influence, thumbing their nose at civic nationalists. Their strategy was to get that border hardened at a time when nationalists were at the cusp of becoming a majority, it didn't cost them a thought. It was a major strategic error and now the DUP is on its last legs, by the look of it, because it all backfired when Boris lied to them.
There is nothing wrong with the Protocol in terms of the Act of Union, the British courts have told us that. The problem is Brexit and the decision to leave the Single Market and Customs Union. It means in NI there has to be a loser and that makes it incompatible the constructive ambiguity of the GFA. Tories are too thick to know about stuff like that, but the DUP knew. Some moderate unionist voted to remain because of it.
One of the characteristics of Brexit, or at least its supporters, is that the problems it throws up are always for somebody else to solve. The problem with it is that others who had nothing to do with it are required to sacrifice their best interests in order for it to work smoothly. Either the EU sacrifices its Single Market or Ireland leaves it. Nobody in Ireland or the EU voted for that. It won't happen.
'The newly introduced fly in the ointment was the EU's requirement to protect its internal market, which required border checks regardless of the Agreement.'
You cannot have access to the Single Market and have regulatory divergence at the same time. World trade is more about aligning regulations than removing tariffs these days. On of the fundamentals of world trade is the requirement of checks with third countries. This was not 'newly' introduced, Brexiters in their pompous arrogance believed they could have their cake and eat it. They engage in whinging victimhood when they discover they can't have their cake and eat it.
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1