Comments by "Taint ABird" (@taintabird23) on "Daily Mail World" channel.

  1. 17
  2. 7
  3. 7
  4. 7
  5. 6
  6. 6
  7. 5
  8. 5
  9. 5
  10. 5
  11. 4
  12. 4
  13. 4
  14. 4
  15. 4
  16. 4
  17. 4
  18. 4
  19. 4
  20. 3
  21. 3
  22. 3
  23. 3
  24. 3
  25. 3
  26. 3
  27. 3
  28. 3
  29. 3
  30. 3
  31. All countries in the EU have had economic difficulties since joining, but all countries have a higher standard of living today than they had before EU membership. The Greeks lied about everything and should never have been admitted to the EU never mind the Euro, the Italians have been nursing a huge national debt since before they joined the Euro, and Cyprus was exposed to the Greek collapse and eurozone crisis Spain, Italy and Cyprus all had growth rates higher than that of the UK in 2017. France has a higher GDP per capita than the UK, while the Italians are just behind the UK. Why do these countries not want to leave? Why do the Greeks not want to leave - they almost begged not to be thrown out of the Eurozone. Unlike the UK, none of these countries are planning to leave the EU. One wonders what you point is... 'Did you watch the World Cup and see all those people cheering on their country's teams? That's the "nationalism" you seem to despise, and no amount of self-serving EU political dogma will change it.' I seem to despise, it do I? I love it. I love people celebrating their national identity in peace and friendship. The EU does much to foster the notion of maintaining national identity in this manner asking only that members citizens adopt a common EU identity alongside it. The English lack the confidence to entertain such a notion and have instead demonised the entity in order to distract from decades of bad economic and social policies. The idea that the membership of the EU is a challenge to national identity is as ridiculous in the context of the UK where national identities survive despite also sharing British identity. Poland and Hungary don't define the EU. Every member of the EU has its beef with the bloc, but the UK is the only country planning - or not planning actually - to leave. Apparently, Brexit will be a disaster for the EU, while the UK will remain unscathed if everyone would only just believe in it enough. Are you stocking food and medicine yet? Brexit is stupid.
    3
  32. 3
  33. 3
  34. 3
  35. 3
  36. 3
  37. 2
  38. 2
  39. 2
  40. 2
  41. 2
  42. 2
  43. 2
  44. 2
  45. 2
  46. 2
  47. 2
  48. 2
  49. 2
  50. 2
  51. 2
  52. 2
  53. Yeah, right. The Institute for Government, a think-tank in London, notes that all big countries have bilateral agreements on such trade-facilitating measures as customs co-operation, data exchange and standards. Imagine, ifthe World's fifth largest economy exited the EU with no deal? Hosuk Lee-Makiyama of ECIPE, a Brussels-based think-tank, says that only seven countries trade with the EU on WTO terms alone—and they are small fry like Western Sahara, South Sudan, Cuba and Venezuela. The UK will be joining this merry band of economic powerhouses. In any case, reverting to WTO rules is not simple. The UK was a founder of the organisation but now belongs as an EU member. To resume WTO membership independently will require a division of EU import quotas, notably for beef, lamb and butter - I believe this may be happening again at the moment. A first effort was roundly rejected by big food exporters like Brazil, Argentina, the US and even New Zealand. The WTO proceeds by consensus among its 164 members. Were Britain to leave the EU on acrimonious terms, negotiating its resumption of full WTO membership could be difficult. Brexiteers say trade with third countries would be easier. Perhaps, but the EU has free-trade deals with some 60 countries, including South Korea and Mexico, and just recently, Japan. It will not be easy for the UK to “grandfather” these deals, especially if it has walked out with no deal, if only because doing so would need EU agreement, too. Then there is the WTO’s “most-favoured-nation” rule, which bars discrimination unless it is allowed by a fully registered free-trade deal. If after no deal the UK and the EU wanted bilateral trade to stay tariff-free, both sides would have to offer the same privileges to all WTO members. Services are barely covered by WTO rules, but even here, were Britain to seek to keep trade in services, the same terms would have to be given to several countries with which the EU has free-trade deals, including Canada. Subjection to WTO rules might yet prove more problematic than Brexiteers realise. The UK does not need to reapply to the WTO on leaving the EU as the UK is a member in its own right, though currently operating through the bloc. The UK’s detailed WTO commitments on tariffs and barriers to trade are set out in schedules shared with the EU. On Brexit, the UK will need to have its own schedules and for those schedules to be certified, there must be no objections by any other WTO members. We can speculatethat the ability of any member of the WTO to veto proposed changes would mean the UK was at the mercy of countries playing politics with ulterior motives, say by Argentina over the Falklands or by Spain over Gibraltar. Or of course the EU themselves in the event of a no deal. As such, the WTO is another ironic example of a process supposedly about “taking back control” handing real power of the UK’s post-Brexit fate to the whims of outside powers. Brexit is that stupid. It is the greatest exercise in national self-harm since the Easter Islanders cut down their last tree, but I will not speculate as to the social, economic, political and constitutional implications of this farce, as this is taboo. You have little to be worrying about with regard to Continental perceptions of the UK. You should be reminded of the English taste for heroic failure instead. Retreats and disasters loom large in your culture, from Balaclava to Dunkirk to Scott of the Antarctic, the Somme, the list goes on and on. Kipling hints to the English cult of 'heroic failure' when he stated in 'If' that 'triumph and disaster are the same thing'. Brexit follows in this rich tradition. What a clusterf*ck.
    2
  54. 2
  55. 2
  56. 2
  57. 1
  58. 1
  59. 1
  60. 1
  61. 1
  62. 1
  63. 1
  64. 1
  65. 1
  66. 1
  67. 1
  68. 1
  69. 1
  70. 1
  71. 1
  72. 1
  73. 1
  74. 1
  75. 1
  76. 1
  77. 1
  78. 1
  79. 1
  80. 1
  81. 1
  82. 1
  83. 1
  84. 1
  85. 1
  86. 1
  87. 1
  88. 1
  89. 1
  90. 1
  91. 1
  92. 1