Comments by "Raven Aussie" (@ravenaussie3760) on "History of Boxing EN" channel.

  1. Except he didn't train properly. It was also the only fight where he didn't somersault over the ropes. Like it or not, Hamed was not at his best.
    26
  2. Is that why he's 10-1 against former or current world champions? Clown.
    16
  3.  @triconcert  Clown.
    16
  4.  @1man1bike1road  Barrera beat Hamed when he wasn't at his best. Hamed is far more famous than Barrera.
    12
  5.  @pbarron1349  He literally split from his trainer and had weight problems shortly before the fight. It's not an excuse, you fool. Also, I'm not denying that he lost and would've lost a rematch. All I'm saying is he would've won when at his best.
    12
  6.  @jaybee2402  If it was that close of a fight when Hamed wasn't at his best, Hamed certainly would've won at his best. You guys are lucky the true monster wasn't unleashed on Barrera that night. Cry more, mate.
    11
  7.  @rb9888  Hamed was (and is) popular across the entire world. Barrera is mostly popular in Mexico alone.
    5
  8.  @keithdukes5990  Clown.
    4
  9.  @AussieBirds2103  Hamed is 10-1 against former or current world champions and was not at his best when fighting Barrera. Be quiet, mate.
    4
  10.  @AussieBirds2103  He would've beaten Barrera had he been at his best. No doubt. Continue crying about it.
    4
  11.  @iggs67  I don't think you know what a quitter is, mate. He went the distance with Barrera.
    3
  12.  @pbarron1349  That second comment makes no grammatical sense.
    3
  13.  @stevebowness9435  Yeah, obviously. I'm saying Hamed would've won at his best.
    3
  14.  @peaceseeker9927  Not an all-time great? If that's the case, why was he inducted into the International Boxing Hall of Fame? If that's the case, why does BoxRec rank him as the 35th-greatest European pound-for-pound fighter of all time and the 17th-greatest British fighter of all time? If that's the case, why does ESPN rank him number 22 on their list of 25 of the greatest pound-for-pound fighters of the last 25 years? If that's the case, why does World Boxing rank him as the 11th-greatest British fighter of all time? If that's the case, why does Gareth A. Davies of The Telegraph rank him as the 10th-greatest British fighter of all time? If that's the case, why does The Ring rank him as the 46th-greatest puncher of all time? If that's the case, why did Steve Bunce state he was the greatest British fighter of all time? If that's the case, why did the UK public vote for Hamed's victory over Kevin Kelley on the list of the 100 Greatest Sporting Moments? If that's the case, why has he inspired countless fighters across different sports such as Conor McGregor, Israel Adesanya, Tyson Fury, Floyd Mayweather Jr., Carl Froch, Amir Khan, Kell Brook, Billy Joe Saunders, David Benavidez, Joe Cordina, Ricky Burns, Kid Galahad, David Haye, James DeGale, Badou Jack, Liam Smith, and Kal Yafai? If that's the case, why does he remain an extremely popular figure whose praises have been sung by Sean Ingle, Dan Rafael, Emanuel Steward, SugarHill Steward, Lou DiBella, and countless others? I just destroyed you, you absolute fool. 😁
    3
  15.  @kevleafy  He would've won at his best.
    3
  16.  @phylicia595  Yes.
    2
  17.  @jaybee2402  Those are terrible excuses. Also, they were clearly good enough to win world titles. And he knocked out all but two of them. Cry more, mate.
    2
  18.  @TheJbonez1000  Congratulations on changing your tune. Also, Barrera beat a past-his-best Naseem Hamed.
    2
  19.  @martytruelove5026  Then that won't be a bestseller.
    2
  20.  @telelaci2  He beat ten world champions, mate. He wasn't at his best against Barrera.
    2
  21. In your fan fiction, maybe.
    2
  22.  @telstar4772  No, I agree he would've lost the rematch. I'm saying at his best, Hamed would've won.
    2
  23.  @MrWeliz  Barrera is lucky that he didn't fight prime Hamed. And Hamed retired because he was not the fighter he originally was.
    2
  24.  @navsingh9406  He simply wasn't the fighter he originally was. No amount of training can change that.
    2
  25.  @interabang  He had a career of hand injuries.
    2
  26.  @OliHandy2008  They're certainly against him for some reason. I understand he was cocky, but he was a great fighter.
    2
  27.  @illmitchjax  World titles make you a world champion. What are you talking about? And he'd have beaten Barrera at his best.
    2
  28.  @illmitchjax  But he would've beaten Barrera. Also, be beat Kevin Kelley.
    2
  29.  @illmitchjax  But he would've beaten Barrera. Also, he beat Kevin Kelley.
    2
  30.  @bradtaylor5828  I know. I know that, Brad Taylor. You don't need to tell me that. At his best, though, Hamed would've won.
    2
  31.  @trosvaldocolunga4493  He had weight problems, recently split from his trainer, hardly trained, and had many hand injuries. He was not at his best when he fought Barrera.
    2
  32.  @jackspring7709  They are valid excuses. Hamed wasn't at his best.
    2
  33.  @jackspring7709  Hamed hardly trained, had recently split from his trainer, had weight issues shortly before the fight, and had many hand injuries throughout his career. The fact is that he was not at his best. They aren't excuses, mate. Deal with it, biased fanboy.
    2
  34.  @jackspring7709  Hamed wasn't at his best. Simple as that. You literally just acknowledged that. Fool, fool, fool.
    2
  35.  @jackspring7709  They were literally disadvantages that Hamed had. You literally just said all the things that made him not at his best. Had he been at his best, he would've won.
    2
  36.  @jackspring7709  The stuff with Hamed is known, so shush. Also, how could the judges pick Ali as the winner when the fight was stopped?
    2
  37.  @jackspring7709  It's literally known that Hamed wasn't at his best, you fool. He didn't even have the trainer he'd had for the majority of his career. Hamed was the favourite going in, and there was a reason for that. At his best, he would've won. But he was not the fighter he once was and he was not focused enough to train properly.
    2
  38.  @illmitchjax  He fought good opponents.
    2
  39.  @kenneth9874  Get over what, how foolish you are? That'll be hard.
    2
  40.  @jackspring7709  Clown.
    2
  41.  @jackspring7709  Barrera was better on the night, but Hamed would've won at his best.
    2
  42.  @kiaraantonio1210  Congratulations, you can read. I am thoroughly impressed.
    2
  43.  @kiaraantonio1210  Congratulations, you can read. I am thoroughly impressed.
    2
  44.  @kiaraantonio1210  I proved everything wrong. You literally stated the things which made Hamed not at his best. How can you say all that, then deny it? You are clueless when it comes to boxing, mate.
    2
  45.  @davidjack3  He'd recently split from Brendan Ingle, who'd trained him his entire career. He also had difficulty making weight beforehand. He hardly trained. He also had accumulative hand injuries up to that point.
    2
  46.  @kiaraantonio1210  Mate, if I don't know boxing, then no-one does. I know infinitely more about it than you do. Also, you're saying that I'm resorting to insults? I asked you for proof, so you said I don't know boxing. 🤣🤣🤣 You obviously just don't have any proof. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
    2
  47.  @kiaraantonio1210  Lol. Whatever you say, bro. I've been sweeping since this conversation began. Nothing but delusion and bias. Bye now. 🤣🤣🤣
    2
  48.  @BROTHERSPEEDIO  He fought once more, idiot. Also, he won some rounds. You're utterly clueless. 🤣
    1
  49.  @TheJbonez1000  Lol, you're a fool. And Amir Khan beat him. 😂
    1
  50.  @TheJbonez1000  Europeans are the most talented fighters, you fool.
    1