Comments by "Kath" (@Kath-nd6pj) on "NATO 'has three years to prepare for Russian attack' | Ukraine: The Latest | Podcast" video.

  1. Yes, their turn of phase is as if they are accusing Ukraine for the audacity of even asking for help. That These fighters that have for the past year been face to face, day after day in the war zone may have a diffiert view of certain situations than some USA learners generals miles away, hiw dare they! Many analysts have noted that warfare with drones has moved on, western military is learning alternatives from thise n Ukraine all the time. As for disagreements within the Ukrainian leadership, Churchill was for ever at odds with the military minds, with allies leaders, with everyone at some time or other throughout the whole of WW2. Even more so than us puplic were ever nade aware of.
    17
  2. A cynic could say, they sell more weapons this way. Come up with the good stuff too fast, then less chance of getting rid of the unwanted near obsolete first. Saving on storage costs etc. But chances are they mostly feared Russia then Putin’s new friends in China, North Korea and India would get their hands on the more modern technology in ambush.
    8
  3. Yes, and in 1943 there were massive amounts of calls within the USA for them to pull out of WW2. A huge scale PR job was undertaken to keep the people on board and continue with Boston Wars Bonds, recruitment etc.
    2