Comments by "cdl0" (@cdl0) on "Lei's Real Talk"
channel.
-
37
-
25
-
21
-
17
-
11
-
8
-
5
-
5
-
5
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
4
-
Notwithstanding the artificial sources of radiation discussed in this video, the elevated natural levels of radiation are likely due to higher levels of cosmic radiation, rather than ultraviolet (UV) radiation, owing to the thinner atmosphere at high altitude. Moreover, natural levels vary widely owing to local geology; however, I do not know the specific situation in Tibet.
Concerning the dirty bomb hypothesis presented in this video, it is an interesting idea, but its validity seems dubious, since any territory that is the target of such weapons will be rendered uninhabitable for centuries; thus, is not a good strategy for conquest or annexation. Storage and delivery of such weapons is also problematic, for obvious reasons.
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
3
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@jmc129 No, this is not censorship because censorship means that the videos would be removed, which is not happening. The videos are simply not being promoted, presumably because they do not make money for YouTube, and nothing more sinister than that. The same is equally true for the many brilliant videos by very talented creators on mathematics, physics, computer science, and so on. Hardly anybody watches them. Lei's Real Talk is an outstanding channel and has improved greatly from when it started, so I think its numbers of views, subscribers, and likes will grow. YouTube does at least host these video free of charge for creators and viewers. The cost of all that computer and network equipment is enormous.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
@drumpfdon760 No, although there was some interbreeding, Neanderthals only contributes about 1-4% to the DNA of modern humans throughout Eurasia, including East Asians, and possibly confers some strengths such a resistance to certain diseases, as well as the cause of some diseases. There was also a closely related sub-species called Denisovan found in Siberia and Tibet, who were related to Neanderthals. Some of their DNA ended up in the aboriginal people of Australia, Oceania, Polynesia, etc. but not mainland east Asia. So, DUMPF Don, unless you are an African, you can take pride in the knowledge that you are likely about 3% archaic hominid. We are all the same.
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
I see many well-made varied videos and a website by Lei, so I wonder what she means by 'censored'. It seems to me that Lei is free to express her opinions openly, and indeed does. Lei is also free to hold and express her faith; however, freedom also means others are free to criticize if their opinion on faith differs. This would not be possible in China. Also, it is universal that it always feels like things are getting worse, when, in fact, the opposite is true. In the free world, liberty, equality, and fairness is certainly greater now that it was a generation ago. Anybody is at liberty to put themselves forward as a candidate in elections in the free world, including America, but this is certainly not the case in China. Anyway, I like the videos on this channel. Please feel free to debate; you are welcome!
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This video is an important topic that, as a senior scientist and researcher, I would like to see progress with. Lei is brilliant at all aspects of Chinese culture and the shenanigans within the CCP; however, I can see that her weak spot in the present context, and I am sure she will agree, is the science and doing science research, and truly understanding its meaning, and through mathematical analysis of data. She needs to collaborate with an experienced researcher, and ideally somebody who is from one of the hard-core mathematical sciences, namely physics, chemistry, or applied maths. This, taken together with Lei's excellent communication skills, stands the best chance of making that much-needed progress. Possibly this is too late for episode two, but is there any chance of a sequel?
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
This is another excellent thought-provoking video from Lei's Real Talk, most of which is right. However, Lei is incorrect about the need for religion in innovation. As a scientist, it is my observation that the great majority of people engaged in the mathematical sciences and engineering are strongly atheist, myself included. Religion plays absolutely no role in the fundamental sciences. Lei's view is also coloured by her American viewpoint. Science is a global activity. Most of the rest of the free world has a much more secular culture. Nevertheless, Lei does correctly identify the repression of free-thinking and imagination by the authoritarian CCP as a factor leading to lack of innovation. Moreover, one critical point missed here by Lei, but implicit in what she said, is the lack of diversity in China: The CCP has not only crushed free-thinking, it has also created an ecologically dead monoculture, where new ideas cannot evolve.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
@drumpfdon760 Sorry, if I include a link in my comment, it is automatically rejected by YouTube, so you will have to search for the information yourself, but is plentiful and easy to find. The widely touted figure of saving 400m births is now believed to be wrong. For example, you will find Thailand and South Korea cited as two of the benchmarks: they never had a One Child Policy, yet their birthrates are nearly the same as in China (see previous comments for the reasons). The Chinese authorities also did a long-term experiment in Shanxi, where the policy was suspended, yet no increase in birthrate was observed. There is plenty more if you care to look. This terrible policy caused so much pain and anguish, and the CCP clung to it for so long, yet in the end it proved utterly pointless, and completely ineffective.
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1