Comments by "Alexey 9" (@Fillipok) on "Lavrov’s epic fail at G20 and new status of Russia as a 'people's republic.' Sounds familiar?" video.

Russia has the right to defend its borders. Russia has made it clear that joining NATO is a red border for Russia. Another question is whether we will be able to bring the matter to an end, but Russia had reasons for the military operation. And Ukraine chose the path of war with Russia.
4
Mmm, you're outright lying. Nobody accuses Ukraine of defending themselves. Russia accuses Ukraine of deliberately creating a threat to Russia and not responding in any way to Russia's requests to stop.
2
@boredgrass Oddly enough, there are a huge number of US leaders on this list. Do you remember how many countries the US has invaded? How many states did the US destroy and how many victims appeared after that? When will the US answer for this? Maybe first call the US to account, make the US pay for its wars. And this is completely different I forgot. Russia is the new Reich, the US is not. All right. So funny to read about your hypocrisy.
1
@VitoldsTheDestroyer You don't need to tell me that Ukraine was against NATO. This is complete nonsense. Ukraine and NATO planned a dozen joint military drills for 2022. No one gave Russia a guarantee that Ukraine would not be in NATO. Even Boris Johnson openly admitted this. Putin did not like Boris Johnson's formulation that Ukraine would not be in NATO for the foreseeable future. This means that, for example, in 10 years Ukraine may join NATO. This is a certain risk and we must take it into account. Russia had every right to protect its borders from NATO. Another issue is that our state failed to adequately prepare for a military invasion. But this is a completely different question.
1
@stefanmeier5957 Well, I don't know much about Finland, but I've always had a positive attitude towards it. Now, of course, I feel some anxiety about Finland's entry into NATO, but I think that sooner or later the situation in the world will calm down.
1
@mr_benn_escapes_lockdown1780 The admission of Ukraine into NATO has long been planned to contain Russia. The gradual integration of Ukraine into NATO became the cause of the war. The war in Ukraine became a pretext for accelerating the expansion of NATO, but they had such plans for a long time and would have happened sooner or later. Even Boris Johnson confirmed that Putin expressed concern about the possible entry of Ukraine into NATO. Your example with India and Pakistan is absurd. If Pakistan were to deliberately enter into a military alliance that aims at the destruction of India, there would be an immediate reaction from India. You can be sure of this.
1
@stefanmeier5957 There is a key difference. In the event of the use of nuclear weapons by Russia in Kaliningrad, NATO will have the opportunity to destroy Russia in response. If NATO manages to surround Russia on all sides, placing air defense along the borders of Russia, then NATO will be able to destroy the entire nuclear potential of Russia without a retaliatory strike from Russia. That's the difference. The approach of NATO threatens to deprive Russia of the ability to launch a nuclear retaliatory strike. The Americans openly say they want to be able to shoot down Russian nuclear missiles. I want to remind you that Russia's deployment of nuclear weapons in Kaliningrad took place in response to the NATO missile defense system approaching Russia's borders. We are only responding to the ever-increasing threat from NATO.
1
I don't remember the US being ashamed when they bombed Iraq, Libya, Syria. If the United States did not answer for this, then you cannot ask anything from us. You cannot call us to shame and justice when you yourself are destroying the lives of countries. You are hypocrites. We protect the interests of Russia and the laughter of hyenas is of no interest to us.
1