Comments by "Alexey 9" (@Fillipok) on "Live: After brief suspension, Russia says Ukraine grain traffic to resume • FRANCE 24 English" video.

  1. Mmm, Russia could strike at the Odessa port and in this case, UAVs will not help in any way. The bottom line is that Turkey can put pressure on Russia. It's funny to read all sorts of mom's analysts from YouTube.
    3
  2. @Peter Laing These guarantees mean nothing... Ukraine can break tomorrow and nothing will happen to it. No one will comply with any obligations concluded with Russia. I can also recall how Russia was promised the opportunity to export grain and fertilizers in exchange for a grain deal, but none of this was fulfilled. There will be a similar situation here. And the Kremlin understands this, but cannot refuse Erdogan...
    3
  3. Russia could have destroyed the Odessa port and no Turkish ship would have been damaged.
    3
  4. Not a correct conclusion. Drones are very small and do not radiate heat, so most of the air defenses cannot target the drones. And the missiles of those air defenses that can attack are more expensive than UAVs.
    3
  5. Ukraine also won. Zelensky got the opportunity to attack Russia further unhindered, using the grain corridor ... The Kremlin has already shown that it cannot answer this in any way.
    3
  6. You misunderstood what happened. Nobody asks Russia about the grain deal anymore. Russia is only formally a participant in some kind of deal. Now Ukraine can supply any number of weapons across the sea, can make any number of attacks using the grain route, and Russia will not be able not to respond in any way. If Russia tries to oppose something, then Erdogan will be able to hit Russia very painfully. So we can say that Russia has once again been thrown and humiliated.
    2
  7. Not only grain, but Ukraine will now be able to openly supply weapons there and attack Crimea using the grain route. Ukraine tried to make an attack through the grain route, then Russia stopped the deal, but everyone ignored it. In fact, Russia is no longer a party to the deal and the conditions for the grain route are determined without Russia. You don't understand the scope of what's going on...
    2
  8. In fact, we can say that Russia is no longer a participant in the grain deal. Now Ukraine can supply any number of weapons through the sea, make any attacks through the grain route, and we can no longer give any opposition. Sad. Such "gestures of good will" will not win the war ... Either Putin will begin to act seriously or Russia will soon be gone.
    1
  9. No, the whole point is that Erdogan insisted on continuing the grain deal... After the announcement of the termination of the grain deal, Erdogan's ships continued to carry grain... Erdogan can put pressure on Russia in case of refusal. Therefore, Russia once again lost here and received only some meaningless guarantees that the grain route would not be used for attacks, which will be ignored ... Everyone remembers how the Minsk agreements were implemented ... We are waiting for another Ukrainian attack using UAVs through the grain route and concern from the Kremlin
    1
  10.  @klowen7778  NATO would hardly be ready to start a nuclear war over grain, Erdogan insisted on continuing the grain deal.
    1
  11. Russia tried to respond to Ukraine's attack via the grain route, but Russia was given a location and told that Ukraine could do whatever it wanted... Rather, it looks like Russia can no longer respond to Ukraine's provocations.
    1
  12.  @marilenaganea6578  This is your serious argument. You are a worthy opponent for the dispute;)
    1
  13.  @proselytizingorthodoxpente8304  So Russian missiles fly far enough;) The Russian fleet does not have to be near Odessa.
    1