Comments by "Андрей Борцов" (@Mentol_) on "How Stalin Shaped The Struggle Between Germany and Russia | Man Of Steel | Timeline" video.

USSR had its own criteria for democracy.
2
The purges did not affect the Red Army. A lend-lease is needed to compensate for part of the economy that was lost after the German occupation and to shorten the duration of the war.
2
You are spreading false information. What are the female and Mongolian divisions in the red army (show Russian source, please)? How can foreign supplies save your army if they are fickle? How can the western front save the USSR if the turning point on the eastern front happened earlier? You seem to be the victim of a lot of propaganda.
2
Are you sure about this? Poland, France and Britain (together) had economic parity with Germany, but allowed her to destroy themselves one at a time.
2
@bobbyjohn2768 The problem is that Anthony Sutton is not a historian, but an economist. This book is a conspiracy theory. Instead of reading conspiracy theories, read the articles of Lenin and Stalin (primary source).
2
The reign of Tsar Nicholas ended after the February Revolution in Russia. The October Revolution overthrew those who overthrew the monarchy. Then there was a civil war between the supporters of the Soviet and bourgeois republics (both revolutionary). The supporters of the monarchy were in the minority.
1
@privacyadvocate6697 "Only in a communist society, when the resistance of the capitalists has already been finally broken, when the capitalists have disappeared, when there are no classes, only then the state disappears and we can talk about freedom." Lenin "State and Revolution", chapter five.
1
Your numbers are wrong. In addition, you can easily see how many soldiers lost the sides in the Polish and French campaigns of the Wehrmacht.
1
@copsondonuts 1. Your information about the Mongols and women in the Red Army is not correct (I do not know where you got it). Women in the Soviet army were in secondary roles — medics, snipers, and anti-aircraft personnel. Mongols were not in the Red Army because Mongolia is not part of the USSR. This is a different state (lol).I found information that about 500 Mongols who were volunteers fought in the Soviet army. Thus, their number is insignificant compared to the total army strength of 6.6 million since the end of 1942. 2. You do not know what would have happened if the USSR did not have foreign supplies. Nescience cannot be turned into a proven fact. This is the basic logic. 3. You do not understand what the term "second front" means. It means that in continental Europe there is a land front, the opening of which can seriously change the balance of forces in the east. For this reason, Africa and Italy cannot be considered a second front. Only France. 4. I do not know where you get the information that the red army was poorly armed. She, like any army, had advantages and disadvantages. It had more tanks, aircraft, and rifles than the Wehrmacht, but fewer trucks, shells, and armored personnel carriers. 5. I read your other post. You do not understand what the ratio of losses is mean. The main factor of infantry losses is artillery fire. But the Wehrmacht had more ammunition for heavy artillery in the east until 1944. Also, German soldiers had a better level of education. This is the main reason why losses in 41-43 were unequal. For example, if you look at the countries against which Germany used its main forces (Poland, France, USSR), you will see that they are losing more soldiers than the Wehrmacht. But you are not saying that the Poles or the French were bad at war, you only say this to the address of the USSR. This makes me conclude that for some reason you strongly dislike the USSR as a state or its government (which automatically means propaganda).
1