Comments by "" (@titteryenot4524) on "David Icke on Free Speech u0026 Who Controls the World" video.

  1. Like what? What was he right about?
    3
  2. Icke is brilliant at (seemingly) thinking for himself and throwing out a few theories. What’s he’s been guilty of his whole life (after he gave up interviewing snooker players), is not providing a scintilla of evidence for these said theories.🤓
    2
  3.  @satanicbbc5090  Wow! You got some serious sh*t going on there, man. Ok, deep breath: When you say Icke is an ‘obvious controlled opposition’, I have no idea what you are on about. Who is ‘controlling’ him and what is he ‘opposing’? Before you answer these questions you need to think about the credible evidence you’re going to supply, and not just assert stuff willy-nilly, because I don’t operate like that. ‘Every single BBC presenter looks like a transgender’. Well now. Even accepting your dubious assumption that there is a transgender ‘look’ we can all agree upon, how about I throw out a few names at complete random as they pop into my head: Dan Walker; Naga Munchetty; Jane Hill; Kirsty Wark; Huw Edwards; Martine Croxall; Fiona Bruce; Sophie Rayworth; Victoria Coren Mitchell. Ok, with the best will in the world I look at every one of these people and to me they look to a man and a woman what they are. In other words, I have no idea wtf you are on about when you say every BBC presenter looks transgender. To then state with no apparent shame that this is ‘scientifically observable’ is clearly patent nonsense, and I suspect you may know this, notwithstanding your apparent ingenuousness. But here is my main point: every single BBC presenter is transgender. So what? As to Icke himself? To me he just looks like any other ordinary middle-aged bloke. The reason I suspect Icke has undergone certain mind-expanding experiences is quite simply I speak from direct experience here, and when he discusses some of this stuff it chimes remarkably closely to what I underwent. As to Icke’s family ‘looking transgender’, well, let’s see: Gareth - from the pictures I have seen he appears to look like an everyday bloke. Ditto Jaymie. Similarly, his daughters look like ordinary women. Your point about certain religions and genital mutilation I concur with and I, personally, abhor the practices, if they are done without the consent of those being operated on. To then bring in the BBC on this theme? No idea again wtf you’re on about. Asserting stuff without corroborating evidence doesn’t cut it with me as I’m sure you’ll have gathered by now. I agree that media and entertainment have an influence on our behaviours but I, for one, don’t feel unduly ‘manipulated’. If you do, then that’s your issue. Your penultimate point just sounded like the ramblings of a pub bore so I’ll skip that. Your final 3 points are simply incorrect. 3 of my close family are in the medical profession and I can assure you there are such things as ‘viruses’. You are free to believe what you want. Nuclear weapons exist as I’m sure you’ve seen the Hiroshima/Nagasaki bombings and their aftermath. Again, if you reject this credible evidence you are free to do so. Space exploration again gives us overwhelming evidence that this has occurred and continues. If you choose to refute this, that is your prerogative.
    2
  4.  @sam5694  Nah. The pedo thing is so easy to claim, and it would be out in this current climate if there were any real egregious shit going down. You need to supply evidence; something Icke singularly fails to do on so many issues.
    2
  5.  @sam5694  Don’t patronise me, mate. Icke just states stuff without doing the due diligence of supplying the corroborating evidence. Anyone can do that. He has never really had my full respect as he, to this day, continues to promulgate the theory of the world being ruled by a cabal of shape-shifting lizards, and not supplied a scintilla of evidence for this claim. As Carl Sagan said: extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence . Of course, there is an influential military-industrial and media complex that most of us are under the influence of, but that’s not news to me. He needs to come forward with evidence. For 30 years he has not done this. That just makes him a curiosity piping his theories in from the sidelines, but nothing more than this.
    2
  6.  @sam5694  Prove it. You say they are shapeshifting lizards; I say prove it. If you can’t do this, just shut the fuck up as it’s boring already.
    2
  7.  @satanicbbc5090  Yeah, but ‘truth’ requires corroborating evidence, otherwise it’s mere chaff in the wind. As I see it, Icke has had some kind of ‘consciousness expanding’ experience, the like of which thousands of others throughout history appear to have undergone. To then make the egregious leap to us all being ruled by a cabal of shape-shifting lizards is inadmissible unless Icke can provide substantiating evidence we can all look at and which can be peer-reviewed. In the 30 years Icke has been peddling his outlandish theories, as far as I can see, he has not supplied an iota of credible evidence. If he had have provided this he wouldn’t be the fringe-figure he is. I repeat, I don’t doubt he underwent some kind of mind-expanding experience; what I do doubt is all the wacky piffle he has erected around this experience.
    1
  8.  @jmus6494  Correct.
    1