Comments by "" (@titteryenot4524) on "Channel 4 News" channel.

  1.  @bid84  Yeah? Source?
    4
  2.  @will.roman-ros  Ta, Willie.👍
    4
  3.  @VHS-CINEMA Just for the record: I cannot recall a single occasion where those most vociferous supporters of the Palestinians have even once publicly categorically condemned Hamas. That’s one of the deep mysteries of this whole thing: why are pro-Palestinians not doing this as a matter of course? After all, they are the direct cause of this current bout of trouble, yet little to no condemnation. Weird.
    4
  4. Perhaps some organisers need to be Asake’d here. P45s ahoy!
    4
  5.  @pjl8119  Indeed.
    4
  6.  @b.l.a.biglovealwaysbiglove4053  I take your point about the book promotion and I do consider Faulding a bit of a grifter, but I just Googled sonar coverage and the first thing that came up was: “Searchers looking for missing woman Mary Yap have now deployed a high frequency underwater sonar unit which can cover 10 miles of river a day.” This was in 2017. So, this 10-mile thing doesn’t appear to be an exaggeration by Faulding. Given this, this investigation had potentially 30 miles coverage, 15 upstream, 15 downstream, to locate Nicola. They didn’t. Serious questions need to be asked. This all assumes, of course, that poor Nicola wasn’t dumped in the river after the sonar/diver search, a point I made in the OP.
    4
  7.  @b.l.a.biglovealwaysbiglove4053  C’mon man. This wasn’t the Nile. It’s also tidal so sludge? Really? A few reeds maybe. A little silt, perhaps, but nothing the latest sonar high-tech stuff couldn’t cope with. I think you are cutting the investigators too much slack here but we can agree to disagree. 👍
    4
  8.  @b.l.a.biglovealwaysbiglove4053  Yes, and the body was 1 mile from the bench! Don’t you get this? If the sonar didn’t go beyond the weir, the divers should have. Did they? Looks like they didn’t.
    4
  9.  @leenieledejo6849 There’s a very interesting book called Cosmic Consciousness by RM Bucke. In it, he details what ‘cosmic consciousness’ is (just massively expanded awareness compared to the normal workaday human awareness) and he includes Shakespeare as a clear case. I agree. Shakespeare wasn’t necessarily overtly ‘religious’, as such, in his writings, but there is no doubt in my own mind that, along with the likes of Jesus, Whitman, Pascal, Buddha et al., he had this expanded awareness or ‘cosmic consciousness’. 👍
    4
  10.  @richardduplessis1090  K, Dicky, keep yer knickers on, m8! 👍
    4
  11. ‘Dushbag’? Lol. Weirdest spelling of ‘douchebag’ I’ve seen yet! 👍
    4
  12. Ur mom.
    4
  13.  @samrowbotham8914 Lol. Ok. Whatever. Rice isn’t English either. You’re insane. 🤦‍♂️
    4
  14.  @davidr7819 Not making any ‘political capital’. I was just pointing out the reality that importing 1% of your population every year is a bit of an issue for quite a few people. 👍
    4
  15. Sue Gray reports that ‘There was excessive drinking and a minor altercation. Someone was sick. A swing was broken.’ So that’s boozing, fighting, puking and swinging; just an ordinary Saturday night in any British town, then.
    4
  16.  @Rumpleforeskin77  Smegma?
    4
  17.  @chiaroscurio  False memory, Al. Gates went up in 1989.😉
    4
  18. Ah, so no “Do not comply. No to Covid vaccines … etc etc” today, mate? Are you ok?
    4
  19.  @israeldiegoriveragenius2th164  Having dipped into some of your playlists, I’m not sure I’ve encountered a more paranoid fella. No doubt you’ll be stocking up on the tinfoil hats at Christmas.😉
    4
  20.  @Jst.a.Normal.Bottle.of.Mustard  But if we are all neutral, where’s the issue? If some dickhead gets too big for their boots the combination of all the neutral states can counter this.
    4
  21.  @granted3203  I’m the type of guy who has no idea if God exists or not. Why is this seemingly so difficult for you to understand and accept? Moreover, let’s just assume for the sake of argument that he/she/it does exist; in this case, my anathema for the sheep mentality of organised religion would still be the same.
    4
  22.  @gerrabath  Ffs. Why are you asking me to do your work? It’s all out there. Pew Research and plenty of others.
    4
  23.  @tomasinacovell4293  Moron. Moronic, non-sequitur comment.
    4
  24.  @itzsleazy6903  Did you read my OP or are you just ranting? Again, for your benefit: “I’m pro legal immigration and obviously pro helping out genuine asylum seekers”. If you can prove you can offer a country some economic benefit and/or are fleeing genuine persecution, you are welcome. Don’t make me out to be something I’m not. Almost everyone I know more or less shares this opinion. It’s not controversial.
    4
  25.  @mohamedbenhamida5652  What is so difficult about this? Every sovereign country should have the final say as to whom and whom they do not admit. It’s not controversial. Every country more or less operates this way, anyway. Why are you suggesting the UK/Europe should be any different?
    4
  26. 0:16 🤣🤣😅😅🤣😂😂😂😅🤣😅😂😂🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😅🤣😂🤣😅🤣😂😂😂🤣😂🤣😅🤣😂🤣😅🤣😂🤣😂😂😂🤣😅🤣😂🤣😅😂🤣😅🤣🤣
    4
  27.  @em2906ethis  Nah, I don’t need to ‘think again’. Sheehan kinda nailed it. It could be you who needs to ‘think again’. ✌️😉
    4
  28.  @em2906ethis  Er, the OP is, imo, pretty spot-on, darling. Now, I accept you may not be able to cope with it, but that’s not my problem. 👍
    4
  29.  @em2906ethis  Just for the record, I have very little time for those who can’t just put a full stop at the end of their sentences. Worth thinking about before you reply.👍😉
    4
  30.  @colleenpeck6347  Says the woman with the Irish name. ☘️
    4
  31. It’s an Islam thing. People are afraid of Islam taking them over. They’re not afraid of the Samba taking them over.
    4
  32. Triggered. Hehe.
    4
  33.  @michaelrch  Science, by the way, is always revisable with new data coming in; it’s never ‘concluded’ as you suggest. If you want the ‘concluded’ stuff you go to the religion class for that.
    4
  34.  @zanecosgrove4820  Did you actually watch the video? Rubiales literally had Hermoso’s head in his hands like a vice. It wasn’t the other way round as you appear to be portraying it for some bizarre reason. 👍
    4
  35.  @33wanwan  Why don’t you think so?
    4
  36. @0:03 You just know that this guy’s greatest fear is losing his hair. He’s losing his hair. 🤣
    4
  37.  @livefrominbetweentrees  Indeed! 👍
    4
  38.  @mariannehavisham8323  I think you misunderstand me. He had control over accepting the images, but the fact he’s sexually attracted to small boys is outwith his conscious control. That’s all I meant.👍
    4
  39.  @dkrawk8309  Er, remind me who invaded whom, again? 🤔
    4
  40. The double standards of the West in this conflict are staggering. America, along with its partners, has the most prolific record of any country on this planet in terms of actual invasion and/or the overturning of democratically elected governments. What Russia is doing, invading another self-governing, sovereign nation, is wrong, but what about the dozens of times the West has done this? In the last 40 years alone America’s record is: 1. Grenada (1983-1984) 2. Bolivia (1986) 3. Virgin Islands (1989) 4. Liberia (1990; 1997; 2003) 5. Saudi Arabia (1990-1991) 6. Kuwait (1991) 7. Somalia (1992-1994; 2006) 8. Bosnia (1993-) 9. Zaire/Congo (1996-1997) 10. Albania (1997) 11. Sudan (1998) 12. Afghanistan (1998; 2001-) 13. Yemen (2000; 2002-) 14. Macedonia (2001) 15. Colombia (2002-) 16 Pakistan (2005-) 17. Syria (2008; 2011-) 18. Uganda (2011) 19. Mali (2013) 20. Niger (2013) 21. Yugoslavia (1919; 1946; 1992-1994; 1999) 22. Iraq (1958; 1963; 1990-1991; 1990-2003; 1998; 2003-2011) 23. Angola (1976-1992) As far as I can see what Putin and Russia are doing is playing the most commonly-heard tune in the West’s geopolitical songbook.
    4
  41.  @strictlyyoutube6881  🤣
    4
  42.  @pietrojenkins6901  Yup.
    4
  43.  @RADICALDESIGNOFFICIAL  Er, wot? Isn’t all religion ‘ideology’? If that’s what you’re saying, I agree with you. It’s just accident of birth politics, by any other name.
    4
  44.  @pucapower2505  Serious questions: how do you define ‘indigenous Irish’ and what do you do with those who aren’t ‘indigenous Irish’ who are currently living in Ireland according to your criteria?
    4
  45.  @pucapower2505  *Let’s Just for the record, I’m half-Irish. You’re really not very good at this are you, son?
    4
  46.  @pucapower2505  So, once again. You conveniently never answered my questions, so here we go again - serious questions: how do you define ‘indigenous Irish’ and what do you do with those who aren’t ‘indigenous Irish’ who are currently living in Ireland according to your criteria?
    4
  47.  @lm157  Huh? You appear to have the wrong fella here. I’m not pro open-borders. Nice try, though.👍
    4
  48.  @jamessimmons7480  Again, The lady doth protest too much, methinks.
    4
  49.  @josephbenoit6180  If they have a valid reason to flea (sic), then they probably fall into the ‘refugee’ category.
    4
  50. Not as good as Don’t Look Now.
    4