Youtube comments of (@titteryenot4524).

  1. 4500
  2. 3500
  3. 1800
  4. 1700
  5. 1600
  6. 1500
  7. 1400
  8. 1300
  9. 1300
  10. 1100
  11. 1100
  12. 1000
  13. 1000
  14. 955
  15. 887
  16. 868
  17. 841
  18. 823
  19. 781
  20. 750
  21. 743
  22. 736
  23. 731
  24. 722
  25. 684
  26. 675
  27. 628
  28. 626
  29. 626
  30. 622
  31. 619
  32. 607
  33. 569
  34. 559
  35. 559
  36. 543
  37. 540
  38. 534
  39. 514
  40. 512
  41. 511
  42. 489
  43. 473
  44. 467
  45. 455
  46. 448
  47. 445
  48. 440
  49. 427
  50. 412
  51. 410
  52. 401
  53. 398
  54. 393
  55. 392
  56. 391
  57. 387
  58. 384
  59. 384
  60. 383
  61. 370
  62. 367
  63. 366
  64. 364
  65. 363
  66. 360
  67. 358
  68. 354
  69. 351
  70. 351
  71. 351
  72. 350
  73. 338
  74. 328
  75. 327
  76. 326
  77. 318
  78. 316
  79. 314
  80. 314
  81. 307
  82. 300
  83. 300
  84. 299
  85. 298
  86. 295
  87. 294
  88. 292
  89. 289
  90. 288
  91. 286
  92. 286
  93. 282
  94. 282
  95. 281
  96. 280
  97. 276
  98. 275
  99. 271
  100. 268
  101. 263
  102. 260
  103. 258
  104. 256
  105. 253
  106. 251
  107. 251
  108. 251
  109. 249
  110. 240
  111. 240
  112. 239
  113. 238
  114. 236
  115. 236
  116. 234
  117. 232
  118. 232
  119. 231
  120. 230
  121. 222
  122. 222
  123. 220
  124. 220
  125. 219
  126. 218
  127. 218
  128. 218
  129. 216
  130. 215
  131. 214
  132. 213
  133. 212
  134. 211
  135. 209
  136. 208
  137. 207
  138. 206
  139. 203
  140. 202
  141. 202
  142. 201
  143. 201
  144. 200
  145. 199
  146. 196
  147. 195
  148. 193
  149. 192
  150. 192
  151. 187
  152. 179
  153. 179
  154. 178
  155. 178
  156. 177
  157. 174
  158. 174
  159. 174
  160. 174
  161. 173
  162. 173
  163. 172
  164. 172
  165. Surely the key thing in this debate is the preference and rights of biological females as it's they who are potentially having their private spaces occupied. My guess (but it’s a guess based on extensive experience) would be that the vast majority of women (ie with cervix) wouldn’t want biological men in their private spaces, regardless of whether these men self-identify as “women”, and even if they have fully transitioned through physical/chemical castration. Put it this way: if I were a young mum taking her pre-teen child to the public swimming pool, would I want biological men (regardless of their trans status) sharing the changing rooms with me? Answer: no. This does not mean I’m “anti-trans”; it means I am pro-protecting safe spaces for biological women. I don’t care how you self-identify, just as long as your chosen identity doesn’t adversely affect my life. The analogy would be with organised religion: I’m agnostic. Believe in and worship what you want, but when this unfavourably impinges on my life, that’s when my hackles are raised. Religion should be a private matter and not pervade the public sphere and potentially adversely affect the lives of others. With trans people, they can do what they want within the law, express themselves how they want, call themselves what they want (and I will honour this), but if the majority of biological females don’t want them actually physically invading their private spaces, this wish should be honoured in practice.
    171
  166. 169
  167. 169
  168. 168
  169. 168
  170. 167
  171. 165
  172. 163
  173. 161
  174. 158
  175. 157
  176. 157
  177. 156
  178. 155
  179. 153
  180. 152
  181. 152
  182. 152
  183. 151
  184. 150
  185. 148
  186. 148
  187. 145
  188. 144
  189. 144
  190. 143
  191. 141
  192. 141
  193. 141
  194. 140
  195. 140
  196. 139
  197. 139
  198. 139
  199. 138
  200. 137
  201. 137
  202. 137
  203. 137
  204. 136
  205. 135
  206. 134
  207. 134
  208. 134
  209. 134
  210. 134
  211. 133
  212. 132
  213. 130
  214. 130
  215. 129
  216. 129
  217. 129
  218. 128
  219. 128
  220. 127
  221. 127
  222. 126
  223. 126
  224. 125
  225. 125
  226. 125
  227. 124
  228. 124
  229. 124
  230. 124
  231. 121
  232. 121
  233. 120
  234. 119
  235. 118
  236. 118
  237. 117
  238. 116
  239. 116
  240. 115
  241. 115
  242. 115
  243. 115
  244. 114
  245. 114
  246. 113
  247. 113
  248. 112
  249. 112
  250. 111
  251. 110
  252. 110
  253. 110
  254. 110
  255. 110
  256. 110
  257. 109
  258. 109
  259. 109
  260. 109
  261. 109
  262. 108
  263. 108
  264. 107
  265. 106
  266. 106
  267. 106
  268. 106
  269. 105
  270. 104
  271. 104
  272. 103
  273. 103
  274. 103
  275. 103
  276. 103
  277. 102
  278. 102
  279. 100
  280. 100
  281. 100
  282. 100
  283. 99
  284. 99
  285. 99
  286. 98
  287. 98
  288. 98
  289. 97
  290. 97
  291. 97
  292. 97
  293. 97
  294. 96
  295. 96
  296. 96
  297. 95
  298. 95
  299. 95
  300. 95
  301. 94
  302. 94
  303. 93
  304. 92
  305. 92
  306. 92
  307. 92
  308. 90
  309. 89
  310. 89
  311. 88
  312. 88
  313. 88
  314. 88
  315. 88
  316. 88
  317. 87
  318. 87
  319. 87
  320. 86
  321. 86
  322. 86
  323. 86
  324. 86
  325. 86
  326. 85
  327. 85
  328. 85
  329. 85
  330. 84
  331. 84
  332. 84
  333. 84
  334. 84
  335. 83
  336. 83
  337. 83
  338. 82
  339. 82
  340. 82
  341. 82
  342. 82
  343. 82
  344. 81
  345. 81
  346. 81
  347. 81
  348. 81
  349. 81
  350. 81
  351. 80
  352. 80
  353. 80
  354. 80
  355. 80
  356. 80
  357. 80
  358. 80
  359. 79
  360. 79
  361. 79
  362. 79
  363. Surely the key thing in this whole debate is the preference and rights of biological females as it's they who are potentially having their private spaces occupied. My guess (but it’s a guess based on extensive experience) would be that the vast majority of women (ie with cervix) wouldn’t want biological men in their private spaces, regardless of whether these men self-identify as “women”, and even if they have fully transitioned through physical/chemical castration. Put it this way: if I were a young mum taking her pre-teen child to the public swimming pool, would I want biological men (regardless of their trans status) sharing the changing rooms with me? Answer: no. This does not mean I’m “anti-trans”; it means I am pro-protecting safe spaces for biological women. I don’t care how you self-identify, just as long as your chosen identity doesn’t adversely affect my life. The analogy would be with organised religion: I’m agnostic; believe in and worship what you want, but when this unfavourably impinges on my life, that’s when my hackles are raised. Religion should be a private matter and not pervade the public sphere and potentially adversely affect the lives of others. With trans people, they can do what they want within the law, express themselves how they want, call themselves what they want (and I will honour this), but if the majority of biological females don’t want them actually physically invading their private spaces, this wish should be honoured in practice.
    79
  364. 79
  365. 79
  366. 78
  367. 78
  368. 78
  369. 78
  370. 78
  371. 77
  372. 77
  373. 77
  374. 77
  375. 77
  376. 77
  377. 77
  378. 77
  379. 77
  380. 76
  381. 76
  382. 75
  383. 75
  384. 75
  385. 75
  386. 75
  387. 75
  388. 75
  389. 74
  390. 74
  391. 74
  392. 74
  393. 74
  394. 74
  395. 74
  396. 73
  397. 73
  398. 73
  399. 72
  400. 72
  401. 72
  402. 72
  403. 72
  404. 72
  405. 72
  406. 72
  407. 72
  408. 71
  409. 71
  410. 71
  411. 71
  412. 71
  413. Surely the key thing in this debate is the preference and rights of biological females as it's they who are potentially having their private spaces occupied. My guess (but it’s a guess based on extensive experience) would be that the vast majority of women (ie with cervix) wouldn’t want biological men in their private spaces, regardless of whether these men self-identify as ‘women’, and even if they have fully transitioned through physical/chemical castration. Put it this way: if I were a young mum taking her pre-teen child to the public swimming pool, would I want biological men (regardless of their trans status) sharing the changing rooms with me? Answer: no. This does not mean I’m “anti-trans”; it means I am pro-protecting safe spaces for biological women. I don’t care how you self-identify, just as long as your chosen identity doesn’t adversely affect my life. The analogy would be with organised religion: I’m agnostic. Believe in and worship what you want, but when this unfavourably impinges on my life, that’s when my hackles are raised. Religion should be a private matter and not pervade the public sphere and potentially adversely affect the lives of others. With trans people, they can do what they want within the law, express themselves how they want, call themselves what they want (and I will honour this), but if the majority of biological females don’t want them actually physically invading their private spaces, this wish should be honoured in practice.
    71
  414. 71
  415. 70
  416. 70
  417. 70
  418. 70
  419. Sharron is just speaking common sense which, as we know, isn’t so common these days. In this debate, sex and gender are consistently conflated. If you’re male you have the xy chromosome and if you’re female you have the xx. Most, but not all, people fall into one of these two biologically-determined sex categories. Hermaphroditism is rare but should be noted here. As is xx male syndrome. Gender, however, is a socially-determined free for all, and is essentially down to feelings: you can be biologically male and identify as (or feel) “female” and vice-versa, but you cannot actually biologically flip from one to the other. These latter cases of self-identified gender I have no issue with and as long as you’re harming no one, then identify however you want. I don’t care. For me, where the issue arises is specifically when biological males seek to be accepted into biological female categories, and thereby inveigle themselves into female spaces, whether physical public spaces or spaces solely the preserve of females, such as female sports categories. This latter, for me, is as unfair as allowing an adult football team to play in an under-14s league. If a biological male person wants to identify as “female”, I personally have no problem with it; and if a biological female wants me to recognise them as “male”, again, I have no personal issue with this. It’s a free country after all and live and let live. It's when these same people (particularly trans women) claim patently unfair rights, as in Scotland recently, to invade the spaces that should be solely the preserve of biological females that my hackles are raised.
    70
  420. 70
  421. Surely the key thing in this whole debate is the preference and rights of biological females as it's they who are potentially having their private spaces occupied. My guess (but it’s a guess based on extensive experience) would be that the vast majority of women (ie with cervix) wouldn’t want biological men in their private spaces, regardless of whether these men self-identify as “women”, and even if they have fully transitioned through physical/chemical castration. Put it this way: if I were a young mum taking her pre-teen child to the public swimming pool, would I want biological men (regardless of their trans status) sharing the changing rooms with me? Answer: no. This does not mean I’m “anti-trans”; it means I am pro-protecting safe spaces for biological women. I don’t care how you self-identify, just as long as your chosen identity doesn’t adversely affect my life. The analogy would be with organised religion: I’m agnostic. Believe in and worship what you want, but when this unfavourably impinges on my life, that’s when my hackles are raised. Religion should be a private matter and not pervade the public sphere and potentially adversely affect the lives of others. With trans people, they can do what they want within the law, express themselves how they want, call themselves what they want (and I will honour this), but if the majority of biological females don’t want them actually physically invading their private spaces, this wish should be honoured in practice.
    70
  422. 70
  423. 70
  424. 69
  425. 69
  426. 69
  427. 69
  428. 69
  429. 69
  430. 68
  431. 68
  432. 68
  433. 68
  434. 67
  435. 67
  436. 67
  437. 67
  438. 67
  439. 67
  440. 67
  441. 67
  442. 66
  443. 66
  444. 66
  445. 66
  446. 66
  447. 65
  448. 65
  449. 65
  450. 65
  451. 65
  452. 65
  453. 65
  454. 65
  455. 64
  456. 64
  457. 64
  458. 64
  459. 64
  460. 64
  461. 64
  462. 64
  463. 64
  464. 63
  465. 63
  466. 63
  467. 63
  468. 63
  469. 63
  470. 63
  471. 63
  472. 63
  473. 62
  474. 62
  475. 62
  476. Surely the key thing in this debate is the preference and rights of biological females as it's they who are potentially having their private spaces occupied. My guess (but it’s a guess based on extensive experience) would be that the vast majority of women (ie with cervix) wouldn’t want biological men in their private spaces, regardless of whether these men self-identify as “women”, and even if they have fully transitioned through physical/chemical castration. Put it this way: if I were a young mum taking her pre-teen child to the public swimming pool, would I want biological men (regardless of their trans status) sharing the changing rooms with me? Answer: no. This does not mean I’m “anti-trans”; it means I am pro-protecting safe spaces for biological women. I don’t care how you self-identify, just as long as your chosen identity doesn’t adversely affect my life. The analogy would be with organised religion: I’m agnostic. Believe in and worship what you want, but when this unfavourably impinges on my life, that’s when my hackles are raised. Religion should be a private matter and not pervade the public sphere and potentially adversely affect the lives of others. With trans people, they can do what they want within the law, express themselves how they want, call themselves what they want (and I will honour this), but if the majority of biological females don’t want them actually physically invading their private spaces, this wish should be honoured in practice.
    62
  477. 62
  478. 62
  479. 62
  480. 61
  481. 61
  482. 61
  483. 61
  484. 60
  485. 60
  486. 60
  487. 60
  488. 60
  489. 60
  490. 60
  491. 60
  492. 60
  493. 60
  494. 60
  495. 60
  496. 60
  497. 60
  498. 59
  499. 59
  500. 59
  501. 59
  502. 59
  503. 59
  504. 59
  505. 59
  506. 59
  507. 58
  508. 58
  509. 58
  510. 58
  511. 58
  512. 57
  513. 57
  514. 57
  515. 57
  516. 57
  517. 57
  518. 57
  519. 56
  520. 56
  521. 56
  522. 56
  523. 56
  524. 56
  525. 56
  526. Well this is silly but just a sign of the ongoing culture wars. Surely the key thing in this debate is the preference and rights of biological females as it's they who are potentially having their private spaces occupied. My guess (but it’s a guess based on extensive experience) would be that the vast majority of women (ie with cervix) wouldn’t want biological men in their private spaces, regardless of whether these men self-identify as “women”, and even if they have fully transitioned through physical/chemical castration. Put it this way: if I were a young mum taking her pre-teen child to the public swimming pool, would I want biological men (regardless of their trans status) sharing the changing rooms with me? Answer: no. This does not mean I’m “anti-trans”; it means I am pro-protecting safe spaces for biological women. I don’t care how you self-identify, just as long as your chosen identity doesn’t adversely affect my life. The analogy would be with organised religion: I’m agnostic. Believe in and worship what you want, but when this unfavourably impinges on my life, that’s when my hackles are raised. Religion should be a private matter and not pervade the public sphere and potentially adversely affect the lives of others. With trans people, they can do what they want within the law, express themselves how they want, call themselves what they want (and I will honour this), but if the majority of biological females don’t want them actually physically invading their private spaces, this wish should be honoured in practice.
    56
  527. 56
  528. 56
  529. 55
  530. 55
  531. 55
  532. 55
  533. 55
  534. 55
  535. 55
  536. 54
  537. 54
  538. 54
  539. 54
  540. 54
  541. 54
  542. 54
  543. 53
  544. 53
  545. 53
  546. 53
  547. 52
  548. 52
  549. 52
  550. 52
  551. 52
  552. 52
  553. 52
  554. 52
  555. 52
  556. Surely the key thing in this whole debate is the preference and rights of biological females as it's they who are potentially having their private spaces occupied. My guess (but it’s a guess based on extensive experience) would be that the vast majority of women (ie with cervix) wouldn’t want biological men in their private spaces, regardless of whether these men self-identify as “women”, and even if they have fully transitioned through physical/chemical castration. Put it this way: if I were a young mum taking her pre-teen child to the public swimming pool, would I want biological men (regardless of their trans status) sharing the changing rooms with me? Answer: no. This does not mean I’m “anti-trans”; it means I am pro-protecting safe spaces for biological women. I don’t care how you self-identify, just as long as your chosen identity doesn’t adversely affect my life. The analogy would be with organised religion: I’m agnostic. Believe in and worship what you want, but when this unfavourably impinges on my life, that’s when my hackles are raised. Religion should be a private matter and not pervade the public sphere and potentially adversely affect the lives of others. With trans people, they can do what they want within the law, express themselves how they want, call themselves what they want (and I will honour this), but if the majority of biological females don’t want them actually physically invading their private spaces, this wish should be honoured in practice.
    52
  557. 52
  558. 51
  559. 51
  560. 51
  561. 51
  562. 51
  563. 51
  564. 51
  565. 51
  566. 51
  567. 51
  568. 51
  569. 51
  570. 51
  571. 50
  572. 50
  573. 50
  574. 50
  575. 50
  576. 50
  577. 50
  578. 50
  579. 50
  580. 50
  581. 50
  582. 50
  583. 50
  584. 49
  585. 49
  586. 49
  587. 49
  588. 49
  589. 49
  590. 49
  591. 49
  592. 49
  593. 49
  594. 49
  595. 49
  596. 48
  597. 48
  598. 48
  599. 48
  600. 48
  601. 48
  602. 48
  603. 48
  604. 48
  605. 48
  606. 48
  607. 48
  608. 48
  609. 47
  610. 47
  611. 47
  612. 47
  613. 47
  614. 47
  615. 47
  616. 47
  617. 47
  618. 47
  619. 47
  620. 47
  621. 47
  622. 47
  623. 47
  624. 47
  625. 47
  626. 47
  627. 47
  628. 47
  629. 47
  630. 47
  631. 46
  632. 46
  633. 46
  634. 46
  635. 46
  636. 46
  637. 46
  638. 46
  639. 46
  640. 46
  641. 46
  642. 46
  643. 46
  644. 45
  645. 45
  646. 45
  647. 45
  648. 45
  649. 45
  650. 45
  651. 45
  652. 45
  653. 45
  654. 45
  655. 45
  656. 45
  657. 45
  658. 44
  659. 44
  660. 44
  661. 44
  662. 44
  663. 44
  664. 44
  665. 44
  666. 44
  667. 44
  668. 44
  669. 44
  670. 44
  671. 43
  672. 43
  673. 43
  674. 43
  675. 43
  676. 43
  677. 43
  678. 43
  679. 43
  680. 43
  681. 43
  682. 43
  683. 43
  684. 43
  685. 43
  686. 43
  687. 43
  688. 43
  689. Sharron is just speaking common sense which, as we know, isn’t so common these days. In this debate, sex and gender are consistently conflated. If you’re male you have the xy chromosome and if you’re female you have the xx. Most, but not all, people fall into one of these two biologically-determined sex categories. Hermaphroditism is rare but should be noted here. As is xx male syndrome. Gender, however, is a socially-determined free for all, and is essentially down to feelings: you can be biologically male and identify as (or feel) ‘female’ and vice-versa, but you cannot actually biologically flip from one to the other. These latter cases of self-identified gender I have no issue with and as long as you’re harming no one, then identify however you want. I don’t care. For me, where the issue arises is specifically when biological males seek to be accepted into biological female categories, and thereby inveigle themselves into female spaces, whether physical public spaces or spaces solely the preserve of females, such as female sports categories. This latter, for me, is as unfair as allowing an adult football team to play in an under-14s league. If a biological male person wants to identify as ‘female’, I personally have no problem with it; and if a biological female wants me to recognise them as ‘male’, again, I have no personal issue with this. It’s a free country after all and live and let live. It's when these same people (particularly trans women) claim patently unfair rights, as in Scotland recently, to invade the spaces that should be solely the preserve of biological females that my hackles are raised.
    43
  690. 43
  691. 43
  692. 43
  693. 43
  694. 42
  695. 42
  696. 42
  697. 42
  698. 42
  699. 42
  700. 42
  701. 42
  702. 42
  703. 42
  704. 42
  705. 42
  706. 42
  707. 42
  708. 42
  709. 42
  710. 42
  711. 41
  712. 41
  713. 41
  714. 41
  715. 41
  716. 41
  717. 41
  718. 41
  719. 41
  720. 41
  721. 41
  722. 41
  723. 41
  724. 41
  725. 41
  726. 41
  727. 41
  728. 41
  729. 41
  730. 41
  731. 41
  732. 40
  733. 40
  734. 40
  735. 40
  736. 40
  737. 40
  738. 40
  739. 40
  740. 40
  741. 40
  742. 40
  743. 40
  744. 40
  745. 40
  746. 40
  747. 40
  748. 40
  749. 40
  750. 40
  751. 40
  752. 40
  753. 40
  754. 40
  755. 40
  756. 40
  757. 40
  758. 40
  759. 40
  760. 40
  761. 40
  762. 39
  763. 39
  764. 39
  765. 39
  766. 39
  767. 39
  768. 39
  769. 39
  770. 39
  771. 39
  772. 39
  773. 39
  774. 39
  775. I’m struck by how the Russia/Ukraine thing is so desperate and pointless, given the shared cultural/linguistic heritage between the two. It’s akin to England bombing Scotland for the latter having the temerity to vote for self-determination and existence as a sovereign state. That stupid. That pointless. That mad. But then I, an agnostic, think of the Bible. The first murder? Cain and Abel. Brothers. It’s an old, sad, sorry song. Also, If you look at a map of Europe, and you look at the extent of the NATO countries to 1997, they extend as far east as Germany. After 1997, NATO expanded like a cancerous growth (as Putin sees it), to encompass 14 other nations, geographically extending as far east as Estonia and Latvia (crucially, from Putin’s point of view, ex-USSR components.) Now look at Ukraine on this map. A further incursion east, by a state with a majority looking west, not east. A further former ex-USSR component eating into (as Putin sees it) the motherland Russia. Now, I’m no supporter of Putin. He’s wrong to aggressively invade a sovereign, self-governing territory, in my opinion. However, this notwithstanding, I can fully see how, just by looking at a map and the physical geography, Putin might feel threatened and a little boxed in. It’s akin to Canada and Mexico joining a Russia-led alliance and not expecting the USA to take aggressive action. But then the double-standards modus operandi of the west was always hiding in plain sight. Does any of this justify his behaviour? Not a jot.
    39
  776. 39
  777. 39
  778. 39
  779. 39
  780. 39
  781. 39
  782. 39
  783. 38
  784. 38
  785. 38
  786. 38
  787. 38
  788. 38
  789. 38
  790. 38
  791. 38
  792. 38
  793. 38
  794. 38
  795. 38
  796. 38
  797. 38
  798. 38
  799. 38
  800. 38
  801. 38
  802. 38
  803. 37
  804. 37
  805. 37
  806. 37
  807. 37
  808. 37
  809. 37
  810. 37
  811. 37
  812. 37
  813. 37
  814. 37
  815.  @Sam-zu5mr  Uh huh. And what’s that got to do with the fact you can’t alter XX and XY chromosomes that are biologically given at birth? Look, here’s the deal: Surely the key thing in this whole debate is the preference and rights of biological females as it's they who are potentially having their private spaces occupied. My guess (but it’s a guess based on extensive experience) would be that the vast majority of women (ie with cervix) wouldn’t want biological men in their private spaces, regardless of whether these men self-identify as ‘women’, and even if they have fully transitioned through physical/chemical castration. Put it this way: if I were a young mum taking her pre-teen child to the public swimming pool, would I want biological men (regardless of their trans status) sharing the changing rooms with me? Answer: no. This does not mean I’m ‘anti-trans’; it means I am pro-protecting safe spaces for biological women. I don’t care how you self-identify, just as long as your chosen identity doesn’t adversely affect my life. The analogy would be with organised religion: I’m agnostic; believe in and worship what you want, but when this unfavourably impinges on my life, that’s when my hackles are raised. Religion should be a private matter and not pervade the public sphere and potentially adversely affect the lives of others. With trans people, they can do what they want within the law, express themselves how they want, call themselves what they want (and I will honour this), but if the majority of biological females don’t want them actually physically invading their private spaces, this wish should be honoured in practice.
    37
  816. 37
  817. 37
  818. 37
  819. 36
  820. 36
  821. 36
  822. 36
  823. 36
  824. 36
  825. 36
  826. 36
  827. 36
  828. 36
  829. 36
  830. 36
  831. 36
  832. 36
  833. 36
  834. 36
  835. 36
  836. 36
  837. 36
  838. 36
  839. 36
  840. 36
  841. 36
  842. 35
  843. 35
  844. 35
  845. 35
  846. 35
  847. 35
  848. 35
  849. 35
  850. 35
  851. 35
  852. 35
  853. 35
  854. 35
  855. 35
  856. 35
  857. 35
  858. 35
  859. 35
  860. 34
  861. 34
  862. 34
  863. 34
  864. 34
  865. 34
  866. 34
  867. 34
  868. 34
  869. 34
  870. 34
  871. 34
  872. 34
  873. 34
  874. 34
  875. 34
  876. 34
  877. 34
  878. 34
  879. 33
  880. 33
  881. 33
  882. 33
  883. 33
  884. 33
  885. 33
  886. 33
  887. 33
  888. 33
  889. 33
  890. 33
  891. 33
  892. 33
  893. 33
  894. 33
  895. 33
  896. 33
  897. 33
  898. 33
  899. 32
  900. 32
  901. 32
  902. 32
  903. 32
  904. 32
  905. 32
  906. 32
  907. 32
  908. 32
  909. 32
  910. 32
  911. 32
  912. 32
  913. 32
  914. 32
  915. 32
  916. 32
  917. 32
  918. 32
  919. 32
  920. 32
  921. 32
  922. 32
  923. 32
  924. 32
  925. 32
  926. 32
  927. 32
  928. 32
  929. Fully with Rowling on this matter. Surely the key thing in this whole debate is the preference and rights of biological females as it's they who are potentially having their private spaces occupied by biological men. My guess (but it’s a guess based on extensive experience) would be that the vast majority of women (i.e. with cervix) wouldn’t want biological men in their private spaces, regardless of whether these men self-identify as ‘women’, and even if they have fully transitioned through physical/chemical castration. Put it this way: if I were a young mum taking her pre-teen child to the public swimming pool, would I want biological men (regardless of their trans status) sharing the changing rooms with me? Answer: no. This does not mean I’m ‘anti-trans’; it means I am pro-protecting safe spaces for biological women. I don’t care how you self-identify, just as long as your chosen identity doesn’t adversely affect my life. The analogy would be with organised religion: I’m agnostic; believe in and worship what you want, but when this unfavourably impinges on my life, that’s when my hackles are raised. Religion should be a private matter and not pervade the public sphere and potentially adversely affect the lives of others. With trans women, they can do what they want within the law, express themselves how they want, call themselves what they want (and I will honour this), but if the majority of biological females don’t want them actually physically invading their private spaces, this wish should be honoured in practice.
    32
  930. 31
  931. 31
  932. 31
  933. 31
  934. 31
  935. 31
  936. 31
  937. 31
  938. 31
  939. 31
  940. 31
  941. 31
  942. 31
  943. 31
  944. 31
  945. 31
  946. 31
  947. 31
  948. 31
  949. 31
  950. 31
  951. 31
  952. 31
  953. 31
  954. 31
  955. 31
  956. 30
  957. 30
  958. 30
  959. 30
  960. 30
  961. 30
  962. 30
  963. 30
  964. 30
  965. 30
  966. 30
  967. 30
  968. 30
  969. 30
  970. 30
  971. 30
  972. 30
  973. 30
  974. 30
  975. 30
  976. 30
  977. 30
  978. 30
  979. 30
  980. 30
  981. 30
  982. 30
  983. 30
  984. 30
  985. 30
  986. 30
  987. 30
  988. 30
  989. 30
  990. 30
  991. 29
  992. 29
  993. 29
  994. 29
  995. 29
  996. 29
  997. 29
  998. 29
  999. 29
  1000. 29
  1001. 29
  1002. 29
  1003. 29
  1004. 29
  1005. Frankly, no idea why anyone else should be butting in with what a woman does with her own body. It’s her choice. Simply no one else’s business (aside from the father in the given case.) Those who bore on about the “rights of the unborn” seem to be overestimating human life. I’m willing to bet that if you asked 100 people randomly whether they would have wanted to be born (knowing what we do as humans), the vast majority of them would decline the offer. Invariably, it’s those holy rollers who adhere to primitive scriptures written by men thousands of years ago who cause all the trouble here. It’s no accident that abortion rights are such a hot topic in the US, a country with an alarmingly high belief in invisible daddies in the sky. Preventing legal access to abortion doesn’t stop abortions from happening, it just prevents safe abortions as women will seek dangerous underground methods if the legal option is denied them. Another thing that’s always confused me in this debate is how the pro-lifers in the US are oh so keen to “protect the life of the unborn” by denying legal access to abortion, but are quite free and easy with the lives of the born, and are all for any Tom, Dick or Dirty Harry buying a gun like they’re buying candy from a store and going out and shooting up a school every other week. Seems like there’s a contradiction there. Personally, my only issue with abortion is pain. Does the unborn fetus feel pain? On this basis, it should be done as early as possible in the gestation but the bottom line here is simple: it’s a woman’s right to choose what she does with her own body.
    29
  1006. 29
  1007. 29
  1008. 29
  1009. 29
  1010. 29
  1011. 29
  1012. 29
  1013. 29
  1014. 29
  1015. 29
  1016. 29
  1017. 29
  1018. 29
  1019. 29
  1020. 29
  1021. Surely the key thing in this whole debate is the preference and rights of biological females as it's they who are potentially having their private spaces occupied. My guess (but it’s a guess based on extensive experience) would be that the vast majority of women (ie with cervix) wouldn’t want biological men in their private spaces, regardless of whether these men self-identify as “women”, and even if they have fully transitioned through physical/chemical castration. Put it this way: if I were a young mum taking her pre-teen child to the public swimming pool, would I want biological men (regardless of their trans status) sharing the changing rooms with me? Answer: no. This does not mean I’m “anti-trans”; it means I am pro-protecting safe spaces for biological women. I don’t care how you self-identify, just as long as your chosen identity doesn’t adversely affect my life. The analogy would be with organised religion: I’m agnostic; believe in and worship what you want, but when this unfavourably impinges on my life, that’s when my hackles are raised. Religion should be a private matter and not pervade the public sphere and potentially adversely affect the lives of others. With trans people, they can do what they want within the law, express themselves how they want, call themselves what they want (and I will honour this), but if the majority of biological females don’t want them actually physically invading their private spaces, this wish should be honoured in practice.
    29
  1022. 29
  1023. 29
  1024. 29
  1025. 29
  1026. 28
  1027. 28
  1028. 28
  1029. 28
  1030. 28
  1031. 28
  1032. 28
  1033. 28
  1034. 28
  1035. 28
  1036. 28
  1037. 28
  1038. 28
  1039. 28
  1040. 28
  1041. 28
  1042. 28
  1043. 28
  1044. 28
  1045. 28
  1046. 28
  1047. 28
  1048. 28
  1049. 28
  1050. 28
  1051. 28
  1052. 28
  1053. 28
  1054. 28
  1055. 28
  1056. 28
  1057. 28
  1058. 28
  1059. 27
  1060. 27
  1061. 27
  1062. 27
  1063. 27
  1064. 27
  1065. 27
  1066. 27
  1067. 27
  1068. 27
  1069. 27
  1070. 27
  1071. 27
  1072. 27
  1073. 27
  1074. 27
  1075. 27
  1076. 27
  1077. 27
  1078. 27
  1079. 27
  1080. 27
  1081. 26
  1082. 26
  1083. 26
  1084. 26
  1085. 26
  1086. 26
  1087. 26
  1088. 26
  1089. 26
  1090. 26
  1091. 26
  1092. 26
  1093. 26
  1094. 26
  1095. 26
  1096. 26
  1097. 26
  1098. 26
  1099. 26
  1100. 26
  1101. 26
  1102. 26
  1103. 26
  1104. 26
  1105. 26
  1106. 26
  1107. 26
  1108. 26
  1109. 26
  1110. 26
  1111. 26
  1112. 26
  1113. 26
  1114. 26
  1115. 26
  1116. 26
  1117. 26
  1118. 26
  1119. 26
  1120. It’s absolutely no accident this law is being introduced on a Muslim’s watch. As a lifelong agnostic, I have very little time for any organised religion. However, the thing that should be said is that I feel zero threat from any organised religion, bar one. If I were a public figure and publicly castigated Jesus, or Moses, or Krishna, or Buddha, or the Flying Spaghetti Monster, it’s very likely nothing would happen to me. If I publicly slagged off Muhammad, it’s quite likely there’d be a backlash and I’d be watching my back for the rest of my life. That’s the difference. Just ask Salman Rushdie or the Batley teacher who, btw, didn’t even criticise Muhammad; he just showed a damn picture! Imagine living in a society where certain people are so offended by a cartoon, they threaten death to the person who showed it! If certain people are so ‘offended’ by a cartoon, then it’s time to question the belief, not the cartoon. (Similarly, if certain other people are so ‘offended’ by someone suggesting they might not be biologically what they claim they are, it’s time to question the belief, not the questioner). It seems Islam is so trigger-sensitive it can’t take honest criticism, when it’s just a bunch of manmade ideas like all the rest. Never let anyone tell you it’s ‘racist’ or a ‘hate-crime’ to criticise Islam. Islam is a bunch of ideas. These ideas are held by people of multifarious races. No one is criticizing these peoples’ race, or age, or disability, or sexual orientation. That would be stupid. No one chooses these categories. However, it’s not necessarily stupid to criticise Islam. Why? People choose that. Equally, it’s not necessarily stupid to suggest that a person claiming to be a ‘woman’ is actually a biological man and vice-versa. Why? Because they are.
    26
  1121. 26
  1122. 26
  1123. 26
  1124. 26
  1125. 26
  1126. 26
  1127. 26
  1128. 26
  1129. 26
  1130. 25
  1131. 25
  1132. 25
  1133. 25
  1134. Frankly, no idea why anyone else should be butting in with what a woman does with her own body. It’s her choice. Simply no one else’s business. Those who bore on about the “rights of the unborn” seem to be overestimating human life. I’m willing to bet that if you ask 100 people randomly whether they would have wanted to be born (knowing what we do as humans), the vast majority of them would decline the offer. Invariably, it’s those holy rollers who adhere to primitive scriptures written by men thousands of years ago who cause all the trouble here. It’s no accident that abortion rights are such a hot topic in the US, a country with an alarmingly high belief in invisible daddies in the sky. Preventing legal access to abortion doesn’t stop abortions from happening, it just prevents safe abortions as women will seek dangerous underground methods if the legal option is denied them. Another thing that’s always confused me in this debate is how the pro-lifers in the US are oh so keen to “protect the life of the unborn” by denying legal access to abortion, but are quite free and easy with the lives of the born, and are all for any Tom, Dick or Dirty Harry buying a gun like they’re buying candy from a store and going out and shooting up a school every other week. Seems like there’s a contradiction there. Personally, my only issue with abortion is pain. Does the unborn foetus feel pain? On this basis, it should be done as early as possible in the gestation but the bottom line here is simple: it’s a woman’s right to choose what she does with her own body.
    25
  1135. 25
  1136. 25
  1137. 25
  1138. 25
  1139. 25
  1140. 25
  1141. 25
  1142. 25
  1143. 25
  1144. 25
  1145. 25
  1146. 25
  1147. 25
  1148. 25
  1149. 25
  1150. 25
  1151. 25
  1152. 25
  1153. 25
  1154. 25
  1155. 25
  1156. 25
  1157. 25
  1158. 25
  1159. 25
  1160. 25
  1161. 25
  1162. 24
  1163. 24
  1164. 24
  1165. 24
  1166. 24
  1167. 24
  1168. 24
  1169. 24
  1170. 24
  1171. 24
  1172. 24
  1173. 24
  1174. 24
  1175. 24
  1176. 24
  1177. 24
  1178. 24
  1179. 24
  1180. 24
  1181. 24
  1182. 24
  1183. 24
  1184. 24
  1185. 24
  1186. 24
  1187. 24
  1188. 24
  1189. 24
  1190. 24
  1191. 24
  1192. 24
  1193. 24
  1194. 24
  1195. 24
  1196. 24
  1197. 24
  1198. 24
  1199. 24
  1200. 24
  1201. 24
  1202. 24
  1203. 23
  1204. 23
  1205. 23
  1206. 23
  1207. 23
  1208. 23
  1209. 23
  1210. It’s absolutely no accident this law is being introduced on a Muslim’s watch. A big part of this is about not criticising Islam. As a lifelong agnostic, I have very little time for any organised religion. However, the thing that should be said is that I feel zero threat from any organised religion, bar one. If I were a public figure and publicly castigated Jesus, or Moses, or Krishna, or Buddha, or the Flying Spaghetti Monster, it’s very likely nothing would happen to me. If I publicly slagged off Muhammad, it’s quite likely there’d be a backlash and I’d be watching my back for the rest of my life. That’s the difference. Just ask Salman Rushdie or the Batley teacher who, btw, didn’t even criticise Muhammad; he just showed a damn picture! Imagine living in a society where certain people are so offended by a cartoon, they threaten death to the person who showed it! If certain people are so ‘offended’ by a cartoon, then it’s time to question the belief, not the cartoon. (Similarly, if certain other people are so ‘offended’ by someone suggesting they might not be biologically what they claim they are, it’s time to question the belief, not the questioner). It seems Islam is so trigger-sensitive it can’t take honest criticism, when it’s just a bunch of manmade ideas like all the rest. Never let anyone tell you it’s ‘racist’ or a ‘hate-crime’ to criticise Islam; it’s just some manmade ideas. These ideas are held by people of multifarious races. No one is criticizing these peoples’ race, or age, or disability, or sexual orientation. That would be stupid. No one chooses these categories. However, it’s not necessarily stupid to criticise Islam. Why? People choose that. Equally (as JK Rowling rightly points out), it’s not necessarily stupid to suggest that a person claiming to be a ‘woman’ is actually a biological man and vice-versa. Why? Because they are.
    23
  1211. 23
  1212. 23
  1213. 23
  1214. 23
  1215. 23
  1216. 23
  1217. 23
  1218. 23
  1219. 23
  1220. 23
  1221. 23
  1222. 23
  1223. 23
  1224. 23
  1225. 23
  1226. 23
  1227. 23
  1228. 23
  1229. 23
  1230. 23
  1231. 23
  1232. 23
  1233. 23
  1234. 23
  1235. 23
  1236. 23
  1237. 23
  1238. 23
  1239. 22
  1240. 22
  1241. 22
  1242. 22
  1243. 22
  1244. 22
  1245. 22
  1246. 22
  1247. 22
  1248. 22
  1249. 22
  1250. 22
  1251. 22
  1252. 22
  1253. 22
  1254. 22
  1255. 22
  1256. 22
  1257. 22
  1258. 22
  1259. 22
  1260. 22
  1261. 22
  1262. 22
  1263. 22
  1264. 22
  1265. 22
  1266. 22
  1267. 22
  1268. 22
  1269. 22
  1270. 22
  1271. 22
  1272. 22
  1273. 22
  1274. 22
  1275. 22
  1276. 22
  1277. 22
  1278. 22
  1279. 22
  1280. 22
  1281. 22
  1282. 21
  1283. 21
  1284. 21
  1285. 21
  1286. 21
  1287. 21
  1288. 21
  1289. 21
  1290. 21
  1291. 21
  1292. 21
  1293. 21
  1294. 21
  1295. 21
  1296. 21
  1297. 21
  1298. Why does America consistently have a homicide rate 4x that of comparable countries? Why do so many other developed nations not have America’s baleful gun culture? Germany, the UK, Japan, for example, don’t seem to have this terrible issue with gun crime, and yet there is relative peace in terms of general society, and certainly mass killings are rare. America needs to seriously look at its Second Amendment. There are only three countries that have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms: Mexico, Guatemala, and the United States. Although Mexico and Guatemala both have a constitutional right to bear arms, the US is in a league of its own simply because it is the only country without restrictions on gun ownership in its constitution. After the Second Amendment was adopted in 1791, it inspired other countries around the world to provide their citizens with the right to own guns. However, only 15 constitutions (in nine countries) ever included an explicit right to bear arms. They are Bolivia, Costa Rica, Colombia, Honduras, Nicaragua, Liberia, Guatemala, Mexico, and the US. All of those countries, excluding Mexico, the US, and Guatemala, have since rescinded the constitutional right to bear arms. So, America is the outlier here in terms of citizens’ rights to bear arms. Does it want to continue this, and put up with its horrible mass killings? Or does it want to consider repealing the Second Amendment, thereby allowing the average American citizen to breathe that much easier in the ‘land of the free’?
    21
  1299. 21
  1300. 21
  1301. 21
  1302. 21
  1303. 21
  1304. 21
  1305. 21
  1306. 21
  1307. 21
  1308. 21
  1309. 21
  1310. 21
  1311. 21
  1312. 21
  1313. 21
  1314. 21
  1315. 21
  1316. 21
  1317. 21
  1318. 21
  1319. 21
  1320. 21
  1321. 21
  1322. 21
  1323. 21
  1324. 21
  1325. 21
  1326. 21
  1327. 21
  1328. 21
  1329. 21
  1330. 21
  1331. 21
  1332. 21
  1333. 20
  1334. 20
  1335. 20
  1336. 20
  1337. 20
  1338. 20
  1339. 20
  1340. 20
  1341. 20
  1342. 20
  1343. 20
  1344. 20
  1345. 20
  1346. 20
  1347. 20
  1348. 20
  1349. 20
  1350. 20
  1351. 20
  1352. 20
  1353. 20
  1354. 20
  1355. 20
  1356. 20
  1357. 20
  1358. 20
  1359. 20
  1360. 20
  1361. 20
  1362. 20
  1363. 20
  1364. 20
  1365. 20
  1366. 20
  1367. 20
  1368. 20
  1369. 20
  1370. 20
  1371. 20
  1372. 20
  1373. 20
  1374. 20
  1375. 20
  1376. 20
  1377. 20
  1378. 20
  1379. 20
  1380. 20
  1381. 20
  1382. 20
  1383. 20
  1384. 20
  1385. 20
  1386. 20
  1387. 20
  1388. 20
  1389. 20
  1390. 20
  1391. 20
  1392. 20
  1393. 20
  1394. 20
  1395. 20
  1396. 20
  1397. 20
  1398. 20
  1399. 19
  1400. 19
  1401. 19
  1402. 19
  1403. 19
  1404. 19
  1405. 19
  1406. 19
  1407. 19
  1408. 19
  1409. 19
  1410. 19
  1411. 19
  1412. 19
  1413. 19
  1414. 19
  1415. 19
  1416. 19
  1417. 19
  1418. 19
  1419. 19
  1420. 19
  1421. 19
  1422. 19
  1423. 19
  1424. 19
  1425. 19
  1426. 19
  1427. 19
  1428. 19
  1429. 19
  1430. 19
  1431. 19
  1432. 19
  1433. 19
  1434. 19
  1435. 19
  1436. 19
  1437. 19
  1438. 19
  1439. 19
  1440. 19
  1441. 19
  1442. 19
  1443. 19
  1444. 19
  1445. 19
  1446. 19
  1447. 19
  1448. 19
  1449. 19
  1450. 19
  1451. 19
  1452. 19
  1453. 19
  1454. 19
  1455. 19
  1456. 19
  1457. 19
  1458. 18
  1459. 18
  1460. 18
  1461. 18
  1462. 18
  1463. 18
  1464. 18
  1465. 18
  1466. 18
  1467. 18
  1468. 18
  1469. 18
  1470. 18
  1471. 18
  1472. 18
  1473. 18
  1474. 18
  1475. Frankly, no idea why anyone else should be butting in with what a woman does with her own body. It’s her choice. Simply no one else’s business. Those who bore on about the “rights of the unborn” seem to be overestimating human life. I’m willing to bet that if you ask 100 people randomly whether they would have wanted to be born (knowing what we do as humans), the vast majority of of them would decline the offer. Invariably it’s those holy rollers who adhere to primitive scriptures written by men thousands of years ago who cause all the trouble here. It’s no accident that abortion rights are such a hot topic in the US, a country with an alarmingly high belief in invisible daddies in the sky. Preventing legal access to abortion doesn’t stop abortions from happening, it just prevents safe abortions as women will seek dangerous underground methods if the legal option is denied them. Another thing that’s always confused me in this debate is how the pro-lifers in the US are oh so keen to “protect the life of the unborn” by denying legal access to abortion, but are quite free and easy with the lives of the born, and are all for any Tom, Dick or Dirty Harry buying a gun like they’re buying candy from a store and going out and shooting up a school every other week. Seems like there’s a contradiction there. Personally, my only issue with abortion is pain. Does the unborn foetus feel pain? On this basis, it should be done as early as possible in the gestation but the bottom line here is simple: it’s a woman’s right to choose what she does with her own body.
    18
  1476. 18
  1477. 18
  1478. 18
  1479. 18
  1480. 18
  1481. 18
  1482. 18
  1483. 18
  1484. 18
  1485. 18
  1486. 18
  1487. 18
  1488. 18
  1489. 18
  1490. 18
  1491. 18
  1492. 18
  1493. 18
  1494. 18
  1495. 18
  1496. 18
  1497. 18
  1498. 18
  1499. In this debate, sex and gender are consistently conflated. If you’re male you have the xy chromosome and if you’re female you have the xx. Most, but not all, people fall into one of these two biologically-determined sex categories. Hermaphroditism is rare but should be noted here. As is xx male syndrome. Gender, however, is a socially-determined free for all, and is essentially down to feelings: you can be biologically male and identify as (or feel) ‘female’ and vice-versa, but you cannot actually biologically flip from one to the other. These latter cases of self-identified gender I have no issue with and as long as you’re harming no one, then identify however you want. I don’t care. For me, where the issue arises is specifically when biological males seek to be accepted into biological female categories, and thereby inveigle themselves into female spaces, whether physical public spaces or spaces solely the preserve of females, such as female sports categories. This latter, for me, is as unfair as allowing an adult football team to play in an under-14s league. If a biological male person wants to identify as ‘female’, I personally have no problem with it; and if a biological female wants me to recognise them as ‘male’, again, I have no personal issue with this. It’s a free country after all and live and let live. It's when these same people (particularly trans women) claim patently unfair rights, as in Scotland recently, to invade the spaces that should be solely the preserve of biological females that my hackles are raised.
    18
  1500. 18
  1501. 18
  1502. 18
  1503. 18
  1504. 18
  1505. 18
  1506. 18
  1507. 18
  1508. 18
  1509. 18
  1510. 18
  1511. 17
  1512. 17
  1513. 17
  1514. 17
  1515. 17
  1516. 17
  1517. 17
  1518. 17
  1519. 17
  1520. 17
  1521. 17
  1522. 17
  1523. 17
  1524. 17
  1525. 17
  1526. 17
  1527. 17
  1528. 17
  1529. 17
  1530. 17
  1531. 17
  1532. 17
  1533. 17
  1534. 17
  1535. 17
  1536. 17
  1537. 17
  1538. 17
  1539. 17
  1540. 17
  1541. 17
  1542. 17
  1543. 17
  1544. 17
  1545. 17
  1546. 17
  1547. 17
  1548. 17
  1549. 17
  1550. 17
  1551. 17
  1552. 17
  1553. 17
  1554. 17
  1555. 17
  1556. 17
  1557. 17
  1558. 17
  1559. 17
  1560. 17
  1561. 17
  1562. 17
  1563. 17
  1564. 17
  1565. 17
  1566. 17
  1567. 17
  1568. 17
  1569. 17
  1570. 17
  1571. 17
  1572. 17
  1573. 17
  1574. 17
  1575. 17
  1576. 17
  1577. 17
  1578. 17
  1579. 17
  1580. 17
  1581. 17
  1582. 17
  1583. 17
  1584. 17
  1585. 17
  1586. 17
  1587. 17
  1588. 17
  1589. 17
  1590. 16
  1591. 16
  1592. 16
  1593. 16
  1594. 16
  1595. 16
  1596. 16
  1597. 16
  1598. 16
  1599. 16
  1600. 16
  1601. 16
  1602. 16
  1603. 16
  1604. 16
  1605. What’s happening in France can be correlated with Brexit and Trump. Instead of looking at this in terms of traditional left versus right, David Goodheart’s thesis of two distinct ‘tribes’, the ‘anywheres’ and the ‘somewheres’, with irreconcilable differences may be applicable here. Brexiteers, Trumpeteers and Le Penistas fall into the ‘somewhere’ camp and they may be seen as rooted in geographical identity - the Scottish farmer; working-class Geordie; Cornish housewife - who find rapid changes to the modern world unsettling; are socially conservative; are likely to be older and less well educated and less mobile. This manifests in supporting anti-mass-immigration policies; strong support for the Armed Forces; suspicion of the EU, and more widely ‘other’ cultures; strong support for strict law enforcement (including the death penalty) and a general authoritarianism, with the notion that the primary job of Britain’s leaders is to put British interests first. ‘Anywheres’ are footloose; often urban; university educated; socially liberal; egalitarian and meritocratic in their attitudes to race, sexuality, and gender; are able to migrate and integrate comfortably into other places; are often strong supporters of the EU and globalisation; are lighter in their attachments to larger group identities, including national ones, valuing autonomy and self-realisation before stability, community and tradition. What’s happening in France may be seen as a battle between the Anywheres and the Somewheres just as Brexit and Trump’s election may be seen in these terms. Melenchon’s core base appears to be a curious mixture of the two: ‘Somewheres’ and ‘Anywheres’; traditional left-leaning working-class folk rooted in their specific communities, and a more metropolitan strain, found in the big cities, and while left-leaning, also more likely to fall into the ‘Anywhere’ tribe, principally due to a higher-level of education.
    16
  1606. 16
  1607. 16
  1608. 16
  1609. 16
  1610. 16
  1611. 16
  1612. 16
  1613. 16
  1614. 16
  1615. 16
  1616. 16
  1617. 16
  1618. 16
  1619. 16
  1620. 16
  1621. 16
  1622. 16
  1623. 16
  1624. 16
  1625. 16
  1626. 16
  1627. 16
  1628. 16
  1629. 16
  1630. 16
  1631. 16
  1632. 16
  1633. 16
  1634. 16
  1635. 16
  1636. 16
  1637. What’s happening in France can be correlated with Brexit and Trump. Instead of looking at this in terms of traditional left versus right, David Goodheart’s thesis of two distinct ‘tribes’, the ‘anywheres’ and the ‘somewheres’, with irreconcilable differences may be applicable here. Brexiteers, Trumpeteers and Le Penistas fall into the ‘somewhere’ camp and they may be seen as rooted in geographical identity - the Scottish farmer; working-class Geordie; Cornish housewife - who find rapid changes to the modern world unsettling; are socially conservative; are likely to be older and less well educated and less mobile. This manifests in supporting anti-mass-immigration policies; strong support for the Armed Forces; suspicion of the EU, and more widely ‘other’ cultures; strong support for strict law enforcement (including the death penalty) and a general authoritarianism, with the notion that the primary job of Britain’s leaders is to put British interests first. ‘Anywheres’ are footloose; often urban; university educated; socially liberal; egalitarian and meritocratic in their attitudes to race, sexuality, and gender; are able to migrate and integrate comfortably into other places; are often strong supporters of the EU and globalisation; are lighter in their attachments to larger group identities, including national ones, valuing autonomy and self-realisation before stability, community and tradition. What’s happening in France may be seen as a battle between the Anywheres and the Somewheres just as Brexit and Trump’s election may be seen in these terms.
    16
  1638. 16
  1639. 16
  1640. 16
  1641. 16
  1642. 16
  1643. 16
  1644. 16
  1645. 16
  1646. 16
  1647. 16
  1648. 16
  1649. 16
  1650. 16
  1651. 16
  1652. 16
  1653. 16
  1654. 16
  1655. 16
  1656. 16
  1657. 16
  1658. 16
  1659. 16
  1660. 16
  1661. 16
  1662. 16
  1663. 16
  1664. 16
  1665. 15
  1666. 15
  1667. 15
  1668. 15
  1669. 15
  1670. 15
  1671. 15
  1672. 15
  1673. 15
  1674. 15
  1675. 15
  1676. 15
  1677. 15
  1678. 15
  1679. 15
  1680. 15
  1681. 15
  1682. 15
  1683. 15
  1684. 15
  1685. 15
  1686. 15
  1687. 15
  1688. 15
  1689. 15
  1690. 15
  1691. 15
  1692. 15
  1693. 15
  1694. 15
  1695. 15
  1696. 15
  1697. 15
  1698. 15
  1699. 15
  1700. 15
  1701. 15
  1702. 15
  1703. 15
  1704. 15
  1705. 15
  1706. 15
  1707. 15
  1708. 15
  1709. 15
  1710. 15
  1711. 15
  1712. 15
  1713. 15
  1714. 15
  1715. 15
  1716. 15
  1717. 15
  1718. 15
  1719. 15
  1720. 15
  1721. 15
  1722. 15
  1723. 15
  1724. 15
  1725. 15
  1726. 15
  1727. 15
  1728. 15
  1729. 15
  1730. 15
  1731. 15
  1732. 15
  1733. 15
  1734. 15
  1735. 15
  1736. 15
  1737. 15
  1738. Surely the key thing in this debate is the preference and rights of biological females as it's they who are potentially having their private spaces occupied. My guess (but it’s a guess based on extensive experience) would be that the vast majority of women (ie with cervix) wouldn’t want biological men in their private spaces, regardless of whether these men self-identify as “women”, and even if they have fully transitioned through physical/chemical castration. Put it this way: if I were a young mum taking her pre-teen child to the public swimming pool, would I want biological men (regardless of their trans status) sharing the changing rooms with me? Answer: no. This does not mean I’m “anti-trans”; it means I am pro-protecting safe spaces for biological women. I don’t care how you self-identify, just as long as your chosen identity doesn’t adversely affect my life. The analogy would be with organised religion: I’m agnostic. Believe in and worship what you want, but when this unfavourably impinges on my life, that’s when my hackles are raised. Religion should be a private matter and not pervade the public sphere and potentially adversely affect the lives of others. With trans people, they can do what they want within the law, express themselves how they want, call themselves what they want (and I will honour this), but if the majority of biological females don’t want them actually physically invading their private spaces, this wish should be honoured in practice.
    15
  1739. 15
  1740. 15
  1741. 15
  1742. 15
  1743. 15
  1744. 15
  1745. 15
  1746. 15
  1747. 15
  1748. Peace talks in a fantasy world Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Ok, we want Russia to de-nuclearise and committed to not militarising the Russia/Ukraine border.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “We want Russia disarmed to ensure no threat to Ukraine (or anyone else)” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want protection for the Ukrainian language in eastern Ukraine.” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want Russia to emerge from communist dictatorship and come into the light of free, liberal democracies.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “We want Moscow and St Petersburg to be recognised as free Ukrainian cities.” Peace talks in the real world Putin: Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “Done.” Moral of story: Sometimes bullies just get a little of what they want, but never mess with someone by pitching up at their home expecting to take it forcibly, for as Dustin Hoffman going apeshit in Strawdogs has shown: you are unlikely to win.
    15
  1749. 15
  1750. 15
  1751. 15
  1752. 15
  1753. 15
  1754. 15
  1755. 15
  1756. 15
  1757. 15
  1758. 15
  1759. 15
  1760. 15
  1761. 15
  1762. 15
  1763. 14
  1764. 14
  1765. 14
  1766. 14
  1767. 14
  1768. 14
  1769. 14
  1770. 14
  1771. 14
  1772. 14
  1773. 14
  1774. 14
  1775. 14
  1776. 14
  1777. 14
  1778. 14
  1779. 14
  1780. 14
  1781. 14
  1782. 14
  1783. 14
  1784. 14
  1785. 14
  1786. 14
  1787. 14
  1788. 14
  1789. 14
  1790. 14
  1791. 14
  1792. 14
  1793. 14
  1794. 14
  1795. 14
  1796. 14
  1797. 14
  1798. 14
  1799. 14
  1800. 14
  1801. 14
  1802. 14
  1803. 14
  1804. 14
  1805. 14
  1806. 14
  1807. 14
  1808. 14
  1809. 14
  1810. 14
  1811. 14
  1812. 14
  1813. 14
  1814. 14
  1815. 14
  1816. 14
  1817. 14
  1818. 14
  1819. 14
  1820. 14
  1821. 14
  1822. 14
  1823. 14
  1824. 14
  1825. 14
  1826. 14
  1827. 14
  1828. 14
  1829. 14
  1830. 14
  1831. 14
  1832. 14
  1833. 14
  1834. 14
  1835. 14
  1836. 14
  1837. 14
  1838. 14
  1839. 14
  1840. 14
  1841. 14
  1842. 14
  1843. Surely the key thing in this debate is the preference and rights of biological females as it's they who are potentially having their private spaces occupied. My guess (but it’s a guess based on extensive experience) would be that the vast majority of women (ie with cervix) wouldn’t want biological men in their private spaces, regardless of whether these men self-identify as “women”, and even if they have fully transitioned through physical/chemical castration. Put it this way: if I were a young mum taking her pre-teen child to the public swimming pool, would I want biological men (regardless of their trans status) sharing the changing rooms with me? Answer: no. This does not mean I’m “anti-trans”; it means I am pro-protecting safe spaces for biological women. I don’t care how you self-identify, just as long as your chosen identity doesn’t adversely affect my life. The analogy would be with organised religion: I’m agnostic. Believe in and worship what you want, but when this unfavourably impinges on my life, that’s when my hackles are raised. Religion should be a private matter and not pervade the public sphere and potentially adversely affect the lives of others. With trans people, they can do what they want within the law, express themselves how they want, call themselves what they want (and I will honour this), but if the majority of biological females don’t want them actually physically invading their private spaces, this wish should be honoured in practice.
    14
  1844. 14
  1845. 14
  1846. 14
  1847. 14
  1848. 14
  1849. 14
  1850. 14
  1851. 14
  1852. 14
  1853. 14
  1854. 14
  1855. 14
  1856. 14
  1857. 14
  1858. 14
  1859. 14
  1860. 14
  1861. 14
  1862. 14
  1863. 14
  1864. What’s happening in France can be correlated with Brexit and Trump. Instead of looking at this in terms of traditional left versus right, David Goodheart’s thesis of two distinct ‘tribes’, the ‘anywheres’ and the ‘somewheres’, with irreconcilable differences may be applicable here. Brexiteers, Trumpeteers and Le Penistas fall into the ‘somewhere’ camp and they may be seen as rooted in geographical identity - the Scottish farmer; working-class Geordie; Cornish housewife - who find rapid changes to the modern world unsettling; are socially conservative; are likely to be older and less well educated and less mobile. This manifests in supporting anti-mass-immigration policies; strong support for the Armed Forces; suspicion of the EU, and more widely ‘other’ cultures; strong support for strict law enforcement (including the death penalty) and a general authoritarianism, with the notion that the primary job of Britain’s leaders is to put British interests first. ‘Anywheres’ are footloose; often urban; university educated; socially liberal; egalitarian and meritocratic in their attitudes to race, sexuality, and gender; are able to migrate and integrate comfortably into other places; are often strong supporters of the EU and globalisation; are lighter in their attachments to larger group identities, including national ones, valuing autonomy and self-realisation before stability, community and tradition. What’s happening in France may be seen as a battle between the Anywheres and the Somewheres just as Brexit and Trump’s election may be seen in these terms.
    14
  1865. 14
  1866. 14
  1867. 14
  1868. 14
  1869. 14
  1870. 14
  1871. 14
  1872. 13
  1873. 13
  1874. 13
  1875. 13
  1876. 13
  1877. 13
  1878. 13
  1879. 13
  1880. 13
  1881. 13
  1882. 13
  1883. 13
  1884. 13
  1885. 13
  1886. 13
  1887. 13
  1888. 13
  1889. 13
  1890. 13
  1891. 13
  1892. 13
  1893. 13
  1894. 13
  1895. 13
  1896. 13
  1897. 13
  1898. 13
  1899. 13
  1900. 13
  1901. 13
  1902. 13
  1903. 13
  1904. 13
  1905. 13
  1906. 13
  1907. 13
  1908. 13
  1909. 13
  1910. 13
  1911. 13
  1912. 13
  1913. 13
  1914. 13
  1915. 13
  1916. 13
  1917. 13
  1918. 13
  1919. 13
  1920. 13
  1921. 13
  1922. 13
  1923. 13
  1924. 13
  1925. 13
  1926. 13
  1927. 13
  1928. 13
  1929. 13
  1930. 13
  1931. 13
  1932. 13
  1933. 13
  1934. 13
  1935. 13
  1936. 13
  1937. 13
  1938. 13
  1939. 13
  1940. 13
  1941. 13
  1942. 13
  1943. 13
  1944. 13
  1945. 13
  1946. 13
  1947. 13
  1948. 13
  1949. 13
  1950. 13
  1951. 13
  1952. 13
  1953. 13
  1954. 13
  1955. 13
  1956. 13
  1957. 13
  1958. 13
  1959. 13
  1960. 13
  1961. 13
  1962. 13
  1963. 13
  1964. 13
  1965. 13
  1966. 13
  1967. 13
  1968. 13
  1969. 13
  1970. 13
  1971. 13
  1972. 13
  1973. 13
  1974. 13
  1975. 13
  1976. 13
  1977. 13
  1978. 13
  1979. 13
  1980. 13
  1981. 13
  1982. 13
  1983. 13
  1984. 13
  1985. 13
  1986. 13
  1987. 13
  1988. 13
  1989. 13
  1990. 13
  1991. 13
  1992. 13
  1993. 13
  1994. 13
  1995. 13
  1996. 13
  1997. 12
  1998. 12
  1999. 12
  2000. 12
  2001. 12
  2002. 12
  2003. 12
  2004. 12
  2005. 12
  2006. 12
  2007. 12
  2008. 12
  2009. 12
  2010. 12
  2011. 12
  2012. 12
  2013. 12
  2014. 12
  2015. 12
  2016. 12
  2017. 12
  2018. 12
  2019. 12
  2020. 12
  2021. 12
  2022. 12
  2023. 12
  2024. 12
  2025. 12
  2026. 12
  2027. 12
  2028. 12
  2029. 12
  2030. 12
  2031. 12
  2032. 12
  2033. 12
  2034. 12
  2035. 12
  2036. 12
  2037. 12
  2038. 12
  2039. 12
  2040. 12
  2041. 12
  2042. 12
  2043. 12
  2044. 12
  2045. 12
  2046. 12
  2047. 12
  2048. 12
  2049. 12
  2050. 12
  2051. 12
  2052. 12
  2053. 12
  2054. 12
  2055. 12
  2056. 12
  2057. 12
  2058. What’s happening in France can be correlated with Brexit and Trump. Instead of looking at this in terms of traditional left versus right, David Goodheart’s thesis of two distinct ‘tribes’, the ‘anywheres’ and the ‘somewheres’, with irreconcilable differences may be applicable here. Brexiteers, Trumpeteers and Le Penistas fall into the ‘somewhere’ camp and they may be seen as rooted in geographical identity - the Scottish farmer; working-class Geordie; Cornish housewife - who find rapid changes to the modern world unsettling; are socially conservative; are likely to be older and less well educated and less mobile. This manifests in supporting anti-mass-immigration policies; strong support for the Armed Forces; suspicion of the EU, and more widely ‘other’ cultures; strong support for strict law enforcement (including the death penalty) and a general authoritarianism, with the notion that the primary job of Britain’s leaders is to put British interests first. ‘Anywheres’ are footloose; often urban; university educated; socially liberal; egalitarian and meritocratic in their attitudes to race, sexuality, and gender; are able to migrate and integrate comfortably into other places; are often strong supporters of the EU and globalisation; are lighter in their attachments to larger group identities, including national ones, valuing autonomy and self-realisation before stability, community and tradition. What’s happening in France may be seen as a battle between the Anywheres and the Somewheres just as Brexit and Trump’s election may be seen in these terms.
    12
  2059. 12
  2060. 12
  2061. 12
  2062. 12
  2063. 12
  2064. 12
  2065. 12
  2066. 12
  2067. 12
  2068. 12
  2069. 12
  2070. 12
  2071. 12
  2072. 12
  2073. 12
  2074. 12
  2075. 12
  2076. 12
  2077. 12
  2078. 12
  2079. 12
  2080. 12
  2081. 12
  2082. 12
  2083. 12
  2084. 12
  2085. 12
  2086. 12
  2087. 12
  2088. 12
  2089. 12
  2090. 12
  2091. 12
  2092. 12
  2093. 12
  2094. 12
  2095. 12
  2096. 12
  2097. What’s happening in France can be correlated with Brexit and Trump. Instead of looking at this in terms of traditional left versus right, David Goodheart’s thesis of two distinct ‘tribes’, the ‘Anywheres’ and the ‘Somewheres’, with irreconcilable differences may be applicable here. Brexiteers, Trumpeteers and Le Penistas fall into the ‘somewhere’ camp and they may be seen as rooted in geographical identity - the Scottish farmer; working-class Geordie; Cornish housewife - who find rapid changes to the modern world unsettling; are socially conservative; are likely to be older and less well educated and less mobile. This manifests in supporting anti-mass-immigration policies; strong support for the Armed Forces; suspicion of the EU, and more widely ‘other’ cultures; strong support for strict law enforcement (including the death penalty) and a general authoritarianism, with the notion that the primary job of Britain’s leaders is to put British interests first. ‘Anywheres’ are footloose; often urban; university educated; socially liberal; egalitarian and meritocratic in their attitudes to race, sexuality, and gender; are able to migrate and integrate comfortably into other places; are often strong supporters of the EU and globalisation; are lighter in their attachments to larger group identities, including national ones, valuing autonomy and self-realisation before stability, community and tradition. What’s happening in France may be seen as a battle between the Anywheres and the Somewheres just as Brexit and Trump’s election may be seen in these terms. Melenchon’s core base appears to be a curious mixture of the two: ‘Somewheres’ and ‘Anywheres’; traditional left-leaning working-class folk rooted in their specific communities, and a more metropolitan strain, found in the big cities, and while left-leaning, also more likely to fall into the ‘Anywhere’ tribe, principally due to a higher-level of education.
    12
  2098. 12
  2099. 12
  2100. 12
  2101. 12
  2102. 12
  2103. 12
  2104. 12
  2105. 12
  2106. 12
  2107. 12
  2108. 12
  2109. 12
  2110. 12
  2111. 12
  2112. 12
  2113. 12
  2114. 12
  2115. 12
  2116. 12
  2117. 12
  2118. 12
  2119. 12
  2120. 12
  2121. 12
  2122. 12
  2123. 12
  2124. 12
  2125. 12
  2126. 12
  2127. 12
  2128. 12
  2129. 12
  2130. 12
  2131. 11
  2132. 11
  2133. 11
  2134. 11
  2135. 11
  2136. 11
  2137. 11
  2138. 11
  2139. 11
  2140. 11
  2141. 11
  2142. 11
  2143. 11
  2144. 11
  2145. 11
  2146. 11
  2147. 11
  2148. 11
  2149. 11
  2150. 11
  2151. 11
  2152. 11
  2153. 11
  2154. 11
  2155. 11
  2156. 11
  2157. 11
  2158. 11
  2159. 11
  2160. 11
  2161. 11
  2162. 11
  2163. 11
  2164. 11
  2165. 11
  2166. 11
  2167. 11
  2168. 11
  2169. 11
  2170. 11
  2171. 11
  2172. 11
  2173. 11
  2174. 11
  2175. 11
  2176. 11
  2177. 11
  2178. 11
  2179. 11
  2180. 11
  2181. 11
  2182. 11
  2183. 11
  2184. 11
  2185. 11
  2186. 11
  2187. 11
  2188. 11
  2189. 11
  2190. 11
  2191. 11
  2192. 11
  2193. 11
  2194. 11
  2195. 11
  2196. 11
  2197. 11
  2198. 11
  2199. 11
  2200. 11
  2201. 11
  2202. 11
  2203. 11
  2204. 11
  2205. 11
  2206. 11
  2207. 11
  2208. 11
  2209. 11
  2210. 11
  2211. 11
  2212. 11
  2213. 11
  2214. 11
  2215. 11
  2216. 11
  2217. 11
  2218. 11
  2219. 11
  2220. 11
  2221. 11
  2222. 11
  2223. 11
  2224. 11
  2225. 11
  2226. 11
  2227. 11
  2228. 11
  2229. 11
  2230. 11
  2231. 11
  2232. 11
  2233. 11
  2234. 11
  2235. 11
  2236. 11
  2237. 11
  2238. 11
  2239. 11
  2240. 11
  2241. 11
  2242. 11
  2243. 11
  2244. 11
  2245. 11
  2246. 11
  2247. 11
  2248. 11
  2249. 11
  2250. 11
  2251. 11
  2252. 11
  2253. Whenever the topic of climate change/global warming comes up, as someone neither particularly right nor particularly left politically, I despair at how tribalised and polarised this debate becomes with each camp ensconced in their respective corners, equally convinced that their case is watertight. As ever with these things (and the reason I’m a centrist in almost everything), the truth lies somewhere in the middle. One of the most reasoned and balanced paragraphs I have ever read about this topic is the following from Stephen Pinker: If the emission of greenhouse gases continues, the Earth’s average temperature will rise to at least 1.5°C above the preindustrial level by the end of the 21st century, and perhaps to 4°C above that level or more. That will cause more frequent and more severe heat waves, more floods in wet regions, more droughts in dry regions, heavier storms, more severe hurricanes, lower crop yields in warm regions, the extinction of more species, the loss of coral reefs (because the oceans will be both warmer and more acidic), and an average rise in sea level of between 0.7 metres and 1.2 metres from both the melting of land ice and the expansion of seawater. (Sea level has already risen almost eight inches since 1870, and the rate of the rise appears to be accelerating.) Low-lying areas would be flooded, island nations would disappear beneath the waves, large stretches of farmland would no longer be arable, and millions of people would be displaced. The effects could get still worse in the 22nd century and beyond, and in theory could trigger upheavals such as a diversion of the Gulf Stream (which would turn Europe into Siberia) or a collapse of the Antarctic ice sheets. A rise of 2°C is considered the most that the world could reasonably adapt to, and a rise of 4°C, in the words of a 2012 World Bank report, “simply must not be allowed to occur.” The planet is warming. Fact. Humans (according to the overwhelming scientific consensus) are the principal cause of this warming over the past couple of centuries through fossil fuel burning. Now, given this, and given the consequences eloquently outlined by Pinker, we have to collectively decide whether we want to continue on this trajectory or not. For me, given the data, and given the projected consequences contingent upon that data, it makes utter sense to phase out fossil fuels. With this caveat: we must do it sensibly. They will be needed for some time to come as the transition to renewables is made. Who knows? Given that we are currently in an inter-glacial period, 500 years down the line when we have stopped using fossil fuels, the planet might start a rapid cooling trend leading to that ever-promised next Ice Age, and there might be a desperate clamour to start burning fossil fuels as quickly as possible!
    11
  2254. 11
  2255. 11
  2256. 11
  2257. 11
  2258. 11
  2259. 11
  2260. 11
  2261. 11
  2262. 11
  2263. 11
  2264. 11
  2265. 11
  2266. 11
  2267. 11
  2268. 11
  2269. 11
  2270. 11
  2271. 11
  2272. 11
  2273. 11
  2274. 11
  2275. 11
  2276. 11
  2277. 11
  2278. 11
  2279. 11
  2280. 11
  2281. 11
  2282. 11
  2283. 11
  2284. 11
  2285. 11
  2286. 11
  2287. 11
  2288. 11
  2289. 11
  2290. 11
  2291. 11
  2292. 11
  2293. 11
  2294. 11
  2295. 11
  2296. 11
  2297. 11
  2298. 11
  2299. 11
  2300. 11
  2301. 11
  2302. 11
  2303. 11
  2304. 11
  2305. 11
  2306. 11
  2307. 11
  2308. 11
  2309. 10
  2310. 10
  2311. 10
  2312. 10
  2313. 10
  2314. 10
  2315. 10
  2316. 10
  2317. 10
  2318. 10
  2319. Whenever the topic of climate change/global warming comes up, as someone neither particularly right nor particularly left politically, I despair at how tribalised and polarised this debate becomes with each camp ensconced in their respective corners, equally convinced that their case is watertight. As ever with these things (and the reason I’m a centrist in almost everything), the truth lies somewhere in the middle. One of the most reasoned and balanced paragraphs I have ever read about this topic is the following from Stephen Pinker: If the emission of greenhouse gases continues, the Earth’s average temperature will rise to at least 1.5°C above the preindustrial level by the end of the 21st century, and perhaps to 4°C above that level or more. That will cause more frequent and more severe heat waves, more floods in wet regions, more droughts in dry regions, heavier storms, more severe hurricanes, lower crop yields in warm regions, the extinction of more species, the loss of coral reefs (because the oceans will be both warmer and more acidic), and an average rise in sea level of between 0.7 metres and 1.2 metres from both the melting of land ice and the expansion of seawater. (Sea level has already risen almost eight inches since 1870, and the rate of the rise appears to be accelerating.) Low-lying areas would be flooded, island nations would disappear beneath the waves, large stretches of farmland would no longer be arable, and millions of people would be displaced. The effects could get still worse in the 22nd century and beyond, and in theory could trigger upheavals such as a diversion of the Gulf Stream (which would turn Europe into Siberia) or a collapse of the Antarctic ice sheets. A rise of 2°C is considered the most that the world could reasonably adapt to, and a rise of 4°C, in the words of a 2012 World Bank report, “simply must not be allowed to occur.” The planet is warming. Fact. Humans (according to the overwhelming scientific consensus) are the principal cause of this warming over the past couple of centuries through fossil fuel burning. Now, given this, and given the consequences eloquently outlined by Pinker, we have to collectively decide whether we want to continue on this trajectory or not. For me, given the data, and given the projected consequences contingent upon that data, it makes utter sense to phase out fossil fuels. With this caveat: we must do it sensibly. They will be needed for some time to come as the transition to renewables is made. Who knows? Given that we are currently in an interglacial period, 500 years down the line when we have stopped using fossil fuels, the planet might start a rapid cooling trend leading to that ever-promised next Ice Age, and there might be a desperate clamour to start burning fossil fuels as quickly as possible!
    10
  2320. 10
  2321. 10
  2322. 10
  2323. 10
  2324. 10
  2325. 10
  2326. 10
  2327. 10
  2328. 10
  2329. 10
  2330. 10
  2331. 10
  2332. 10
  2333. 10
  2334. 10
  2335. 10
  2336. 10
  2337. 10
  2338. 10
  2339. What’s happening in France can be correlated with Brexit and Trump. Instead of looking at this in terms of traditional left versus right, David Goodheart’s thesis of two distinct ‘tribes’, the ‘anywheres’ and the ‘somewheres’, with irreconcilable differences may be applicable here. Brexiteers, Trumpeteers and Le Penistas fall into the ‘somewhere’ camp and they may be seen as rooted in geographical identity - the Scottish farmer; working-class Geordie; Cornish housewife - who find rapid changes to the modern world unsettling; are socially conservative; are likely to be older and less well educated and less mobile. This manifests in supporting anti-mass-immigration policies; strong support for the Armed Forces; suspicion of the EU, and more widely ‘other’ cultures; strong support for strict law enforcement (including the death penalty) and a general authoritarianism, with the notion that the primary job of Britain’s leaders is to put British interests first. ‘Anywheres’ are footloose; often urban; university educated; socially liberal; egalitarian and meritocratic in their attitudes to race, sexuality, and gender; are able to migrate and integrate comfortably into other places; are often strong supporters of the EU and globalisation; are lighter in their attachments to larger group identities, including national ones, valuing autonomy and self-realisation before stability, community and tradition. What’s happening in France may be seen as a battle between the Anywheres and the Somewheres just as Brexit and Trump’s election may be seen in these terms.
    10
  2340. 10
  2341. 10
  2342. 10
  2343. 10
  2344. 10
  2345. 10
  2346. 10
  2347. 10
  2348. 10
  2349. 10
  2350. 10
  2351. 10
  2352. 10
  2353. 10
  2354. 10
  2355. 10
  2356. 10
  2357. 10
  2358. 10
  2359. 10
  2360. 10
  2361. 10
  2362. 10
  2363. 10
  2364. 10
  2365. 10
  2366. 10
  2367. 10
  2368. 10
  2369. 10
  2370. 10
  2371. 10
  2372. 10
  2373. 10
  2374. 10
  2375. 10
  2376. 10
  2377. 10
  2378. 10
  2379. 10
  2380. 10
  2381. 10
  2382. 10
  2383. 10
  2384. 10
  2385. 10
  2386. 10
  2387. 10
  2388. 10
  2389. 10
  2390. 10
  2391. 10
  2392. 10
  2393. 10
  2394. 10
  2395. 10
  2396. 10
  2397. 10
  2398. 10
  2399. 10
  2400. 10
  2401. 10
  2402. 10
  2403. 10
  2404. 10
  2405. 10
  2406. 10
  2407. 10
  2408. 10
  2409. 10
  2410. 10
  2411. 10
  2412. 10
  2413. 10
  2414. 10
  2415. 10
  2416. 10
  2417. 10
  2418. 10
  2419. 10
  2420. 10
  2421. 10
  2422. 10
  2423. 10
  2424. 10
  2425. 10
  2426. 10
  2427. 10
  2428. 10
  2429. 10
  2430. 10
  2431. 10
  2432. 10
  2433. 10
  2434. 10
  2435. 10
  2436. 10
  2437. 10
  2438. 10
  2439. 10
  2440. 10
  2441. 10
  2442. 10
  2443. 10
  2444. 10
  2445. 10
  2446. 10
  2447. 10
  2448. 10
  2449. 10
  2450. 10
  2451. 10
  2452. 10
  2453. 10
  2454. 10
  2455. 10
  2456. 10
  2457. 10
  2458. 10
  2459. 10
  2460. 10
  2461. 10
  2462. 10
  2463. 10
  2464. 10
  2465. 10
  2466. 10
  2467. 10
  2468. 10
  2469. 10
  2470. 10
  2471. 10
  2472. 10
  2473. 10
  2474. 10
  2475. 10
  2476. 10
  2477. 10
  2478. 10
  2479. 10
  2480. 10
  2481. 10
  2482. 10
  2483. 10
  2484. 10
  2485. 10
  2486. 10
  2487. 10
  2488. 10
  2489. 10
  2490. 10
  2491. 10
  2492. 10
  2493. 10
  2494. 10
  2495. 10
  2496. 10
  2497. 10
  2498. 10
  2499. 10
  2500. 10
  2501. 10
  2502. 10
  2503. 10
  2504. 10
  2505. 10
  2506. 10
  2507. 10
  2508. 10
  2509. 10
  2510. 10
  2511. 10
  2512. 10
  2513. 10
  2514. 10
  2515. 10
  2516. 10
  2517. 10
  2518. 10
  2519. 10
  2520. 10
  2521. 10
  2522. 10
  2523. 10
  2524. 10
  2525. 10
  2526. 10
  2527. 10
  2528. 10
  2529. 10
  2530. 10
  2531. 10
  2532. 10
  2533. 10
  2534. 10
  2535. 9
  2536. 9
  2537. 9
  2538. 9
  2539. 9
  2540. 9
  2541. 9
  2542. 9
  2543. 9
  2544. 9
  2545. 9
  2546. 9
  2547. 9
  2548. 9
  2549. 9
  2550. 9
  2551. 9
  2552. 9
  2553. 9
  2554. 9
  2555. 9
  2556. 9
  2557. 9
  2558. 9
  2559. 9
  2560. 9
  2561. 9
  2562. 9
  2563. 9
  2564. 9
  2565. 9
  2566. 9
  2567. 9
  2568. 9
  2569. 9
  2570. 9
  2571. 9
  2572. 9
  2573. 9
  2574. 9
  2575. 9
  2576. 9
  2577. 9
  2578. 9
  2579. 9
  2580. 9
  2581. 9
  2582. 9
  2583. 9
  2584. 9
  2585. 9
  2586. 9
  2587. 9
  2588. 9
  2589. 9
  2590. 9
  2591. 9
  2592. Why do so many other developed nations not have America’s baleful gun culture? Germany, the UK, Japan, for example, don’t seem to have this terrible issue with gun crime, and yet there is relative peace in terms of general society, and certainly mass killings are rare. America needs to seriously look at its 2nd Amendment. There are only three countries that have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms: Mexico, Guatemala, and the United States. Although Mexico and Guatemala both have a constitutional right to bear arms, the US is in a league of its own simply because it is the only country without restrictions on gun ownership in its constitution. After the 2nd Amendment was adopted in 1791 (and even then it was only militia set-ups allowed to own a gun; not the individual private citizen), it inspired other countries around the world to provide their citizens with the right to own guns. However, only 15 constitutions (in nine countries) ever included an explicit right to bear arms. They are Bolivia, Costa Rica, Colombia, Honduras, Nicaragua, Liberia, Guatemala, Mexico, and the US. All of those countries, excluding Mexico, the US, and Guatemala, have since rescinded the constitutional right to bear arms. So, America is the outlier here in terms of citizens’ rights to bear arms. Does it want to continue this, and put up with its horrible mass killings? Or does it want to consider repealing the 2nd Amendment (or, at the very least, amending the 2nd Amendment), thereby allowing the average American citizen to breathe that much easier in the ‘land of the free’?
    9
  2593. 9
  2594. 9
  2595. 9
  2596. 9
  2597. 9
  2598. 9
  2599. 9
  2600. 9
  2601. 9
  2602. 9
  2603. 9
  2604. 9
  2605. 9
  2606. 9
  2607. 9
  2608. 9
  2609. 9
  2610. 9
  2611. 9
  2612. 9
  2613. 9
  2614. 9
  2615. 9
  2616. 9
  2617. 9
  2618. 9
  2619. 9
  2620. 9
  2621. 9
  2622. 9
  2623. 9
  2624. 9
  2625. 9
  2626. 9
  2627. 9
  2628. 9
  2629. 9
  2630. 9
  2631. 9
  2632. 9
  2633. 9
  2634. 9
  2635. 9
  2636. 9
  2637. 9
  2638. 9
  2639. 9
  2640. 9
  2641. 9
  2642. 9
  2643. 9
  2644. 9
  2645. 9
  2646. 9
  2647. 9
  2648. 9
  2649. 9
  2650. 9
  2651. 9
  2652. 9
  2653. 9
  2654. 9
  2655. 9
  2656. 9
  2657. 9
  2658. 9
  2659. 9
  2660. 9
  2661. 9
  2662. 9
  2663. 9
  2664. 9
  2665. 9
  2666. 9
  2667. 9
  2668. 9
  2669. 9
  2670. 9
  2671. 9
  2672. 9
  2673. 9
  2674. 9
  2675. 9
  2676. 9
  2677. 9
  2678. 9
  2679. 9
  2680. 9
  2681. 9
  2682. 9
  2683. 9
  2684. 9
  2685. 9
  2686. 9
  2687. 9
  2688. 9
  2689. 9
  2690. 9
  2691. 9
  2692. 9
  2693. 9
  2694. 9
  2695. 9
  2696. 9
  2697. 9
  2698. 9
  2699. 9
  2700. 9
  2701. 9
  2702. 9
  2703. 9
  2704. 9
  2705. 9
  2706. 9
  2707. 9
  2708. 9
  2709. 9
  2710. 9
  2711. 9
  2712. 9
  2713. 9
  2714. 9
  2715. 9
  2716. 9
  2717. 9
  2718. 9
  2719. 9
  2720. 9
  2721. 9
  2722. 9
  2723. 9
  2724. 9
  2725. 9
  2726. 9
  2727. 9
  2728. 9
  2729. 9
  2730. 9
  2731. 9
  2732. 9
  2733. 9
  2734. 9
  2735. 9
  2736. 9
  2737. 9
  2738. Whenever the topic of climate change/global warming comes up, as someone neither particularly right nor particularly left politically, I despair at how tribalised and polarised this debate becomes with each camp ensconced in their respective corners, equally convinced that their case is watertight. As ever with these things (and the reason I’m a centrist in almost everything), the truth lies somewhere in the middle. One of the most reasoned and balanced paragraphs I have ever read about this topic is the following from Stephen Pinker: If the emission of greenhouse gases continues, the Earth’s average temperature will rise to at least 1.5°C above the preindustrial level by the end of the 21st century, and perhaps to 4°C above that level or more. That will cause more frequent and more severe heat waves, more floods in wet regions, more droughts in dry regions, heavier storms, more severe hurricanes, lower crop yields in warm regions, the extinction of more species, the loss of coral reefs (because the oceans will be both warmer and more acidic), and an average rise in sea level of between 0.7 metres and 1.2 metres from both the melting of land ice and the expansion of seawater. (Sea level has already risen almost eight inches since 1870, and the rate of the rise appears to be accelerating.) Low-lying areas would be flooded, island nations would disappear beneath the waves, large stretches of farmland would no longer be arable, and millions of people would be displaced. The effects could get still worse in the 22nd century and beyond, and in theory could trigger upheavals such as a diversion of the Gulf Stream (which would turn Europe into Siberia) or a collapse of the Antarctic ice sheets. A rise of 2°C is considered the most that the world could reasonably adapt to, and a rise of 4°C, in the words of a 2012 World Bank report, “simply must not be allowed to occur.” The planet is warming. Fact. Humans (according to the overwhelming scientific consensus) are the principal cause of this warming over the past couple of centuries through fossil fuel burning. Now, given this, and given the consequences eloquently outlined by Pinker, we have to collectively decide whether we want to continue on this trajectory or not. For me, given the data, and given the projected consequences contingent upon that data, it makes utter sense to phase out fossil fuels. With this caveat: we must do it sensibly. They will be needed for some time to come as the transition to renewables is made. Who knows? Given that we are currently in an interglacial period, 500 years down the line when we have stopped using fossil fuels, the planet might start a rapid cooling trend leading to that ever-promised next Ice Age, and there might be a desperate clamour to start burning fossil fuels as quickly as possible!
    9
  2739. 9
  2740. 9
  2741. 9
  2742. Sharron is just speaking common sense which, as we know, isn’t so common these days. In this debate, sex and gender are consistently conflated. If you’re male you have the xy chromosome and if you’re female you have the xx. Most, but not all, people fall into one of these two biologically-determined sex categories. Hermaphroditism is rare but should be noted here. As is xx male syndrome. Gender, however, is a socially-determined free for all, and is essentially down to feelings: you can be biologically male and identify as (or feel) “female” and vice-versa, but you cannot actually biologically flip from one to the other. These latter cases of self-identified gender I have no issue with and as long as you’re harming no one, then identify however you want. I don’t care. For me, where the issue arises is specifically when biological males seek to be accepted into biological female categories, and thereby inveigle themselves into female spaces, whether physical public spaces or spaces solely the preserve of females, such as female sports categories. This latter, for me, is as unfair as allowing an adult football team to play in an under-14s league. If a biological male person wants to identify as “female”, I personally have no problem with it; and if a biological female wants me to recognise them as “male”, again, I have no personal issue with this. It’s a free country after all and live and let live. It's when these same people (particularly trans women) claim patently unfair rights, as in Scotland recently, to invade the spaces that should be solely the preserve of biological females that my hackles are raised.
    9
  2743. 9
  2744. 9
  2745. 9
  2746. 9
  2747. 9
  2748. 9
  2749. 9
  2750. 9
  2751. 9
  2752. 9
  2753. 9
  2754. 9
  2755. 9
  2756. 9
  2757. 9
  2758. 9
  2759. 9
  2760. 9
  2761. 9
  2762. 9
  2763. 9
  2764. 9
  2765. 9
  2766. 9
  2767. 9
  2768. 9
  2769. 9
  2770. 9
  2771. 9
  2772. 9
  2773. 9
  2774. 9
  2775. 9
  2776. 9
  2777. 9
  2778. 9
  2779. 9
  2780. 9
  2781. 9
  2782. 9
  2783. 9
  2784. 9
  2785. 9
  2786. 9
  2787. 9
  2788. 9
  2789. 9
  2790. 9
  2791. 9
  2792. 9
  2793. 9
  2794. 9
  2795. 9
  2796. 9
  2797. 9
  2798. 9
  2799. 9
  2800. 9
  2801. 9
  2802. 9
  2803. 9
  2804. 9
  2805. 9
  2806. 9
  2807. 9
  2808. 8
  2809. 8
  2810. 8
  2811. 8
  2812. 8
  2813. 8
  2814. 8
  2815. 8
  2816. 8
  2817. 8
  2818. 8
  2819. 8
  2820. 8
  2821. 8
  2822. 8
  2823. 8
  2824. 8
  2825. 8
  2826. 8
  2827. 8
  2828. 8
  2829. 8
  2830. 8
  2831. 8
  2832. 8
  2833. 8
  2834. 8
  2835. 8
  2836. 8
  2837. 8
  2838. 8
  2839. 8
  2840. 8
  2841. 8
  2842. 8
  2843. 8
  2844. 8
  2845. 8
  2846. 8
  2847. 8
  2848. 8
  2849. 8
  2850. 8
  2851. 8
  2852. 8
  2853. 8
  2854. 8
  2855. 8
  2856. 8
  2857. 8
  2858. 8
  2859. 8
  2860. 8
  2861. 8
  2862. 8
  2863. 8
  2864. 8
  2865. 8
  2866. 8
  2867. 8
  2868. 8
  2869. 8
  2870. 8
  2871. 8
  2872. 8
  2873. 8
  2874. 8
  2875. 8
  2876. 8
  2877. 8
  2878. 8
  2879. 8
  2880. 8
  2881. 8
  2882. 8
  2883. 8
  2884. 8
  2885. 8
  2886.  @rcas350pilot8  You need to ask yourself why so many other developed nations don’t have America’s baleful gun culture? Germany, the UK, Japan, for example, don’t seem to have this terrible issue with gun crime, and yet there is relative peace in terms of general society, and certainly mass killings are rare. America needs to seriously look at its Second Amendment. There are only three countries that have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms: Mexico, Guatemala, and the United States. Although Mexico and Guatemala both have a constitutional right to bear arms, the US is in a league of its own simply because it is the only country without restrictions on gun ownership in its constitution. After the Second Amendment was adopted in 1791, it inspired other countries around the world to provide their citizens with the right to own guns. However, only 15 constitutions (in nine countries) ever included an explicit right to bear arms. They are Bolivia, Costa Rica, Colombia, Honduras, Nicaragua, Liberia, Guatemala, Mexico, and the US. All of those countries, excluding Mexico, the US, and Guatemala, have since rescinded the constitutional right to bear arms. So, America is the outlier here in terms of citizens’ rights to bear arms. Does it want to continue this, and put up with its horrible mass killings? Or does it want to consider repealing the Second Amendment, or at the very least amending it, thereby allowing the average American citizen to breathe that much easier in the ‘land of the free’? Furthermore, you need to ask why America has a homicide rate consistently about 4x that of comparable countries, including the UK (so your knife-crime potshot doesn’t work, in this case). I would suggest a massive part of the answer to this is ridiculously easy legal access to firearms in America.
    8
  2887. 8
  2888. 8
  2889. 8
  2890. 8
  2891. 8
  2892. 8
  2893. 8
  2894. 8
  2895. 8
  2896. 8
  2897. 8
  2898. 8
  2899. 8
  2900. 8
  2901. 8
  2902. 8
  2903. 8
  2904. 8
  2905. 8
  2906. 8
  2907. 8
  2908. 8
  2909. 8
  2910. 8
  2911. 8
  2912. 8
  2913. 8
  2914. 8
  2915. 8
  2916. 8
  2917. 8
  2918. 8
  2919. 8
  2920. 8
  2921. 8
  2922. 8
  2923. 8
  2924. 8
  2925. 8
  2926. 8
  2927. 8
  2928. 8
  2929. 8
  2930. 8
  2931. 8
  2932. 8
  2933. 8
  2934. 8
  2935. 8
  2936. 8
  2937. 8
  2938. 8
  2939. 8
  2940. 8
  2941. 8
  2942. 8
  2943. 8
  2944. 8
  2945. 8
  2946. 8
  2947. 8
  2948. 8
  2949. 8
  2950. 8
  2951. 8
  2952. 8
  2953. 8
  2954. 8
  2955. 8
  2956. 8
  2957. 8
  2958. 8
  2959. 8
  2960. 8
  2961. 8
  2962. 8
  2963. 8
  2964. 8
  2965. 8
  2966. 8
  2967. 8
  2968. 8
  2969. 8
  2970. 8
  2971. 8
  2972. 8
  2973. 8
  2974. 8
  2975. 8
  2976. 8
  2977. 8
  2978. 8
  2979. 8
  2980. 8
  2981. 8
  2982. 8
  2983. 8
  2984. 8
  2985. 8
  2986. 8
  2987. 8
  2988. 8
  2989. 8
  2990. 8
  2991. 8
  2992. 8
  2993. 8
  2994. 8
  2995. 8
  2996. 8
  2997. 8
  2998. 8
  2999. 8
  3000. 8
  3001. 8
  3002. 8
  3003. 8
  3004. 8
  3005. 8
  3006. 8
  3007. 8
  3008. 8
  3009. 8
  3010. 8
  3011. 8
  3012. 8
  3013. 8
  3014. 8
  3015. 8
  3016. 8
  3017. 8
  3018. 8
  3019. 8
  3020. 8
  3021. 8
  3022. 8
  3023. 8
  3024. 8
  3025. 8
  3026. 8
  3027. 8
  3028. 8
  3029. 8
  3030. 8
  3031. 8
  3032. 8
  3033. 8
  3034. 8
  3035. 8
  3036. 8
  3037. 8
  3038. 8
  3039. 8
  3040. 8
  3041. 8
  3042. 8
  3043. 8
  3044. 8
  3045. 8
  3046. 8
  3047. 8
  3048. 8
  3049. 8
  3050. 8
  3051. 8
  3052. 8
  3053. 8
  3054. 8
  3055. 8
  3056. 8
  3057. 8
  3058. 8
  3059. 8
  3060. 8
  3061. 8
  3062. 8
  3063. 8
  3064. 8
  3065. 8
  3066. 8
  3067. 8
  3068. 8
  3069. 8
  3070. 8
  3071. 8
  3072. 8
  3073. 8
  3074. In this debate, sex and gender are consistently conflated. If you’re male you have the xy chromosome and if you’re female you have the xx. Most, but not all, people fall into one of these two biologically-determined sex categories. Hermaphroditism is rare but should be noted here. As is xx male syndrome. Gender, however, is a socially-determined free for all, and is essentially down to feelings: you can be biologically male and identify as (or feel) “female” and vice-versa, but you cannot actually biologically flip from one to the other. These latter cases of self-identified gender I have no issue with and as long as you’re harming no one, then identify however you want. I don’t care. For me, where the issue arises is specifically when biological males seek to be accepted into biological female categories, and thereby inveigle themselves into female spaces, whether physical public spaces or spaces solely the preserve of females, such as female sports categories. This latter, for me, is as unfair as allowing an adult football team to play in an under-14s league. If a biological male person wants to identify as “female”, I personally have no problem with it; and if a biological female wants me to recognise them as “male”, again, I have no personal issue with this. It’s a free country after all and live and let live. It's when these same people (particularly trans women) claim patently unfair rights, as in Scotland recently, to invade the spaces that should be solely the preserve of biological females that my hackles are raised.
    8
  3075. 8
  3076. 8
  3077. 8
  3078. 8
  3079. 8
  3080. 8
  3081. 8
  3082. 8
  3083. 8
  3084. 8
  3085. 8
  3086. 8
  3087. 8
  3088. 8
  3089. 8
  3090. 8
  3091. 8
  3092. 8
  3093. 8
  3094. 8
  3095. 8
  3096. 8
  3097. 8
  3098. 8
  3099. 8
  3100. 8
  3101. 8
  3102. 8
  3103. 8
  3104. 8
  3105. 8
  3106. 8
  3107. 8
  3108. 8
  3109. 8
  3110. 8
  3111. 8
  3112. 8
  3113. 8
  3114. 8
  3115. 8
  3116. 8
  3117. 8
  3118. 8
  3119. 8
  3120. 8
  3121. 8
  3122. 8
  3123. 8
  3124. 8
  3125. 8
  3126. 8
  3127. 8
  3128. 8
  3129. 8
  3130. 8
  3131. 8
  3132. 8
  3133. 8
  3134. 8
  3135. 8
  3136. 8
  3137. 8
  3138. 8
  3139. 8
  3140. 8
  3141. 8
  3142. 8
  3143. 8
  3144. 8
  3145. 7
  3146. 7
  3147. 7
  3148. 7
  3149. 7
  3150. 7
  3151. 7
  3152. 7
  3153. 7
  3154. 7
  3155. 7
  3156. 7
  3157. 7
  3158. 7
  3159. 7
  3160. 7
  3161. 7
  3162. 7
  3163. 7
  3164. 7
  3165. 7
  3166. 7
  3167. 7
  3168. 7
  3169. 7
  3170. 7
  3171. 7
  3172. 7
  3173. 7
  3174. 7
  3175. 7
  3176. 7
  3177. 7
  3178. 7
  3179. 7
  3180. 7
  3181. 7
  3182. 7
  3183. 7
  3184. 7
  3185. 7
  3186. 7
  3187. 7
  3188. 7
  3189. 7
  3190. 7
  3191. 7
  3192. 7
  3193. 7
  3194. 7
  3195. 7
  3196. 7
  3197. 7
  3198. 7
  3199. 7
  3200. 7
  3201. 7
  3202. 7
  3203. 7
  3204. 7
  3205. 7
  3206. 7
  3207. 7
  3208. 7
  3209. 7
  3210. 7
  3211. 7
  3212. 7
  3213. 7
  3214. 7
  3215. 7
  3216. 7
  3217. 7
  3218. 7
  3219. 7
  3220. 7
  3221. 7
  3222. 7
  3223. 7
  3224. 7
  3225. 7
  3226. 7
  3227. 7
  3228. 7
  3229.  @johnanderson4214  Such a tired cliche. People without guns might not kill people, but give them free and easy access to them, and suddenly the killing rises dramatically. Why does America consistently have a homicide rate 4x that of comparable countries? Why do so many other developed nations not have America’s baleful gun culture? Germany, the UK, Japan, for example, don’t seem to have this terrible issue with gun crime, and yet there is relative peace in terms of general society, and certainly mass killings are rare. America needs to seriously look at its Second Amendment. There are only three countries that have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms: Mexico, Guatemala, and the United States. Although Mexico and Guatemala both have a constitutional right to bear arms, the US is in a league of its own simply because it is the only country without restrictions on gun ownership in its constitution. After the Second Amendment was adopted in 1791, it inspired other countries around the world to provide their citizens with the right to own guns. However, only 15 constitutions (in nine countries) ever included an explicit right to bear arms. They are Bolivia, Costa Rica, Colombia, Honduras, Nicaragua, Liberia, Guatemala, Mexico, and the US. All of those countries, excluding Mexico, the US, and Guatemala, have since rescinded the constitutional right to bear arms. So, America is the outlier here in terms of citizens’ rights to bear arms. Does it want to continue this, and put up with its horrible mass killings? Or does it want to consider repealing the Second Amendment, thereby allowing the average American citizen to breathe that much easier in the ‘land of the free’?
    7
  3230. 7
  3231. 7
  3232. 7
  3233. 7
  3234. 7
  3235. 7
  3236. 7
  3237. 7
  3238. 7
  3239. 7
  3240. 7
  3241. 7
  3242. 7
  3243. 7
  3244. 7
  3245. 7
  3246. 7
  3247. 7
  3248. 7
  3249. 7
  3250. 7
  3251. 7
  3252. 7
  3253. 7
  3254. 7
  3255. 7
  3256. 7
  3257. 7
  3258. 7
  3259. 7
  3260. 7
  3261. 7
  3262. 7
  3263. 7
  3264. 7
  3265. 7
  3266. 7
  3267. 7
  3268. 7
  3269. 7
  3270. 7
  3271. 7
  3272. 7
  3273. 7
  3274. 7
  3275. 7
  3276. 7
  3277. 7
  3278. 7
  3279. 7
  3280. 7
  3281. 7
  3282. 7
  3283. 7
  3284. 7
  3285. 7
  3286. 7
  3287. 7
  3288. 7
  3289. 7
  3290. 7
  3291. 7
  3292. So, why might people have a downer on homosexuality? •It is ‘unnatural’ - All the research (both scientific and anecdotal) overwhelmingly indicates that sexuality isn’t a choice. The vast majority of us, if we are honest, will attest we were romantically/sexually attracted to others very early (and, conversely, not attracted to others) and no volitional choice, as such, was involved in this attraction. In my own case, I knew when I was about 4 that I fancied girls. •Being gay is a ‘sin’ - This argument is just a non-starter, really, given that presumably this ‘sin’ was ordained by ‘God’, and as that ‘God’ hasn’t been verified (manmade written texts don’t count), then using the ‘it’s a sin’ argument won’t float. •Being gay is, somehow, ‘transmissible’ - This one is ridiculous. You can’t ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. Or, for that matter, you are bisexual, or you aren’t. Those against homosexuality never use this one the other way: Gay people are surrounded by heterosexual culture 24/7/365. Gays are simply assumed to be heterosexual until they state that they are not. Every example, with a very few exceptions, of love & romance in our media is heterosexual. Given this saturation, you’d think all of this exposure to hetty culture might ‘turn’ gays heterosexual, but it doesn’t. It doesn’t in exactly the same way that exposing heterosexuals to gays/gay culture ‘turns’ them, because with sexuality, we just are, and from a pretty early age. •Gays have an ‘agenda’ - Of all the arguments I have heard against homosexuality, this is the only one that might be seen to hold some water, not because it’s a moral argument, as such, but because I can understand why people might not be particularly keen to have what they perceive as ‘gay issues’ shoved down their throats, for want of a better phrase. Even as someone who has zero moral issue with homosexuality, this modern-day aspect of the topic can be annoying. However, it should be pointed out, that those gays who are politically motivated represent a minuscule (<1%) rump of activists heard and seen out of all proportion to their size; meanwhile, the vast majority of gays are simply quietly living their lives unseen and unheard and bothering no one. •What gays actually do in the bedroom is ‘disgusting’ - Well, this is clearly subjective. Museveni seems to think it’s ‘disgusting’, even though he laughably claimed he never knew what they did! In terms of criminality, this is rather simple: if you are going to criminalise consenting adults for performing ‘disgusting’ bedroom antics (i.e. anal/oral sex), then you need to apply this law consistently and criminalise the millions of consenting heterosexual adults having anal/oral sex. If this isn’t done, and heterosexuals are treated in exactly the same way by the law vis-à-vis anal/oral sex, then you can be sure this is just about irrationally criminalising a minority whose behaviours you are personally ‘disgusted’ by. Conclusion: No one, hitherto, has given me a single, rational, credible reason as to why I should support the criminalisation of gay sex.
    7
  3293. 7
  3294. 7
  3295. 7
  3296. 7
  3297. 7
  3298. 7
  3299. 7
  3300. 7
  3301. 7
  3302. 7
  3303. 7
  3304. 7
  3305. 7
  3306. 7
  3307. 7
  3308. 7
  3309. 7
  3310. 7
  3311. 7
  3312. 7
  3313. 7
  3314. 7
  3315. 7
  3316. 7
  3317. 7
  3318. 7
  3319. 7
  3320. 7
  3321. 7
  3322. 7
  3323. 7
  3324. 7
  3325. 7
  3326. 7
  3327. 7
  3328. 7
  3329. 7
  3330. 7
  3331. 7
  3332. 7
  3333. 7
  3334. 7
  3335. 7
  3336. 7
  3337. 7
  3338. 7
  3339. 7
  3340. 7
  3341. 7
  3342. 7
  3343. 7
  3344. 7
  3345. 7
  3346. 7
  3347. 7
  3348. 7
  3349. 7
  3350. 7
  3351. 7
  3352. 7
  3353. 7
  3354. 7
  3355. 7
  3356. 7
  3357. 7
  3358. 7
  3359. 7
  3360. 7
  3361. 7
  3362. 7
  3363. 7
  3364. 7
  3365. 7
  3366. 7
  3367. 7
  3368. 7
  3369. 7
  3370. 7
  3371. 7
  3372. 7
  3373. 7
  3374. 7
  3375. 7
  3376. 7
  3377. 7
  3378. 7
  3379. 7
  3380. 7
  3381. 7
  3382. 7
  3383. 7
  3384. 7
  3385. 7
  3386. 7
  3387. 7
  3388. 7
  3389. 7
  3390. 7
  3391. 7
  3392. 7
  3393. 7
  3394. 7
  3395. 7
  3396. 7
  3397. 7
  3398. 7
  3399. 7
  3400. 7
  3401. 7
  3402. 7
  3403. 7
  3404. 7
  3405. 7
  3406. 7
  3407. 7
  3408. 7
  3409. 7
  3410. 7
  3411. 7
  3412. 7
  3413. 7
  3414. 7
  3415. 7
  3416. 7
  3417. 7
  3418. 7
  3419. 7
  3420. 7
  3421. 7
  3422. 7
  3423. 7
  3424. 7
  3425. 7
  3426. 7
  3427. 7
  3428. 7
  3429. 7
  3430. 7
  3431. 7
  3432. 7
  3433. 7
  3434. 7
  3435. 7
  3436. 7
  3437. 7
  3438. 7
  3439. 7
  3440. 7
  3441. 7
  3442. 7
  3443. 7
  3444. 7
  3445. 7
  3446. 7
  3447. 7
  3448. 7
  3449. 7
  3450. 7
  3451. 7
  3452. 7
  3453. 7
  3454. 7
  3455. 7
  3456. 7
  3457. 7
  3458. 7
  3459. 7
  3460. 7
  3461. 7
  3462. 7
  3463. 7
  3464. 7
  3465. 7
  3466. 7
  3467. 7
  3468. 7
  3469. 7
  3470. 7
  3471. 7
  3472. 7
  3473. 7
  3474. 7
  3475. 7
  3476. 7
  3477. 7
  3478. 7
  3479. 7
  3480. 7
  3481. 7
  3482. 7
  3483. 7
  3484. 7
  3485. 7
  3486. 7
  3487. 7
  3488. 7
  3489. 7
  3490. 7
  3491. 7
  3492. 7
  3493. 7
  3494. 7
  3495. 7
  3496. 7
  3497. 7
  3498. 7
  3499. 7
  3500. 7
  3501. 7
  3502. 7
  3503. 7
  3504. 7
  3505. 7
  3506. 7
  3507. 7
  3508. 7
  3509. 7
  3510. 7
  3511. 7
  3512. 7
  3513. 7
  3514. 7
  3515. 7
  3516. 7
  3517. 7
  3518. 7
  3519. 7
  3520. 7
  3521. 7
  3522. 7
  3523. 7
  3524. 7
  3525. 7
  3526. 7
  3527. The biggest mistake Putin has made here was to arrogantly assume a majority of Ukrainians would simply roll over and have their stomachs tickled by the Russians as they rolled in with their tanks. This is the kind of tone-deafness you get when no one has been able to say ‘no’ to one man for 22 years. In a very real sense, the cause of this war rests squarely on Putin’s shoulders and his mad, misguided designs for a greater mother Russia largely conforming to the old USSR. This is why if Putin succeeds in subjugating Ukraine, then Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania should be very afraid. The good news for them (but not the Ukrainians) is that it looks like because of Putin’s arrogance he may be bogged down in Ukraine for years to come, and even if Russia does subjugate Ukraine, that will only be the beginning, as internal resistance to Russia will be immense. Putin’s 5 main demands: 1. Neutral Ukraine with concomitant commitment never to join NATO. 2. Ukraine disarmed. 3. Protection for Russian language in Ukraine. 4. DeNazification of Ukraine. 5. Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine, including the Donbas … for me, these should be seriously considered by Ukraine, to save what very probably will be the utter destruction of the country and the loss of a large proportion of Ukrainians. If and when Russia can move into some kind of post-Putin democracy, then some of these things may be looked at again. Part of me thinks we should humour this nuclear-armed (blackmail? Perhaps) dictator until he has shuffled off this mortal coil.
    7
  3528. 7
  3529. 7
  3530. 7
  3531. 7
  3532. 7
  3533. 7
  3534. 7
  3535. 7
  3536. 7
  3537. 7
  3538. 7
  3539. 7
  3540. 7
  3541. 7
  3542. 7
  3543. 7
  3544. 7
  3545. 7
  3546. 7
  3547. 7
  3548. 7
  3549. Whenever the topic of climate change/global warming comes up, as someone neither particularly right nor particularly left politically, I despair at how tribalised and polarised this debate becomes with each camp ensconced in their respective corners, equally convinced that their case is watertight. As ever with these things (and the reason I’m a centrist in almost everything), the truth lies somewhere in the middle. One of the most reasoned and balanced paragraphs I have ever read about this topic is the following from Stephen Pinker: If the emission of greenhouse gases continues, the Earth’s average temperature will rise to at least 1.5°C above the preindustrial level by the end of the 21st century, and perhaps to 4°C above that level or more. That will cause more frequent and more severe heat waves, more floods in wet regions, more droughts in dry regions, heavier storms, more severe hurricanes, lower crop yields in warm regions, the extinction of more species, the loss of coral reefs (because the oceans will be both warmer and more acidic), and an average rise in sea level of between 0.7 metres and 1.2 metres from both the melting of land ice and the expansion of seawater. (Sea level has already risen almost eight inches since 1870, and the rate of the rise appears to be accelerating.) Low-lying areas would be flooded, island nations would disappear beneath the waves, large stretches of farmland would no longer be arable, and millions of people would be displaced. The effects could get still worse in the 22nd century and beyond, and in theory could trigger upheavals such as a diversion of the Gulf Stream (which would turn Europe into Siberia) or a collapse of the Antarctic ice sheets. A rise of 2°C is considered the most that the world could reasonably adapt to, and a rise of 4°C, in the words of a 2012 World Bank report, “simply must not be allowed to occur.” The planet is warming. Fact. Humans (according to the overwhelming scientific consensus) are the principal cause of this warming over the past couple of centuries through fossil fuel burning. Now, given this, and given the consequences eloquently outlined by Pinker, we have to collectively decide whether we want to continue on this trajectory or not. For me, given the data, and given the projected consequences contingent upon that data, it makes utter sense to phase out fossil fuels. With this caveat: we must do it sensibly. They will be needed for some time to come as the transition to renewables is made. Who knows? Given that we are currently in an inter-glacial period, 500 years down the line when we have stopped using fossil fuels, the planet might start a rapid cooling trend leading to that ever-promised next Ice Age, and there might be a desperate clamour to start burning fossil fuels as quickly as possible!
    7
  3550. 7
  3551. 7
  3552. 7
  3553. 7
  3554. 7
  3555. 7
  3556. 7
  3557. 7
  3558. 7
  3559. 7
  3560. 7
  3561. 7
  3562. 7
  3563. 7
  3564. 6
  3565. 6
  3566. 6
  3567. 6
  3568. 6
  3569. 6
  3570. 6
  3571. 6
  3572. 6
  3573. 6
  3574. 6
  3575. 6
  3576. 6
  3577. 6
  3578. 6
  3579. 6
  3580. 6
  3581. 6
  3582. 6
  3583. 6
  3584. 6
  3585. 6
  3586. 6
  3587. 6
  3588. 6
  3589. 6
  3590. 6
  3591. 6
  3592. 6
  3593. 6
  3594. 6
  3595. 6
  3596. 6
  3597. 6
  3598. 6
  3599. 6
  3600. 6
  3601. 6
  3602. 6
  3603. 6
  3604. 6
  3605. 6
  3606. 6
  3607. 6
  3608. 6
  3609. 6
  3610. 6
  3611. 6
  3612. 6
  3613. 6
  3614. 6
  3615. 6
  3616. 6
  3617. 6
  3618. 6
  3619. 6
  3620. 6
  3621. 6
  3622. 6
  3623. 6
  3624. 6
  3625. 6
  3626. 6
  3627. 6
  3628. 6
  3629. 6
  3630. 6
  3631. 6
  3632. 6
  3633. 6
  3634. 6
  3635. 6
  3636. 6
  3637. 6
  3638. 6
  3639. 6
  3640. 6
  3641. 6
  3642. 6
  3643. 6
  3644. 6
  3645. 6
  3646. 6
  3647. 6
  3648. 6
  3649. 6
  3650. 6
  3651. 6
  3652. 6
  3653. 6
  3654. 6
  3655. 6
  3656. 6
  3657. 6
  3658.  @Ranzoe813  My point was the idea of “nationalism” specifically. All this nonsense is essentially because men decided to draw lines on maps to arbitrarily designate this area as against that area. Never got nationalism, which is essentially just tribalism on steroids that requires you to put your societal overlords’ agendas over your own. For one thing, no one has any say where they are born, so to take some kind of weird, unearned pride in a random accident of birth is irrational. For another thing, we are artificially programmed to believe that we are to have more loyalty to anyone else that was born in the same artificial territory as we are, but again this is just irrational and stupid, for human beings are incredibly complex and automatically liking and feeling solidarity with this or that human solely according to the idea that they happened to be plopped out by their mother in the same spot on Earth is a moronic notion when really considered. I like/dislike human beings for a whole host of reasons; their opinions, their ideas, their dress sense, the way they treat others etc. but the idea that I should like them and feel loyalty to them on a random accident of birth, something over which none of us have any say, isn’t (and shouldn’t be) on my radar. The moment you ask me to die for you simply because we are from the same town/city/country, you are crossing into irrational territory and losing me right there and then. The only thing worth dying for is a good cause (so you'd better have one ready), and most of the time, wars started by nation-states are rooted in anything but good causes.
    6
  3659. 6
  3660. 6
  3661. 6
  3662. 6
  3663. 6
  3664. 6
  3665. 6
  3666. 6
  3667. 6
  3668. 6
  3669. 6
  3670. 6
  3671. 6
  3672. 6
  3673. 6
  3674. 6
  3675. 6
  3676. 6
  3677. 6
  3678. 6
  3679. 6
  3680. 6
  3681. 6
  3682. 6
  3683. 6
  3684. 6
  3685. 6
  3686. 6
  3687. 6
  3688. 6
  3689. 6
  3690. 6
  3691. 6
  3692. 6
  3693. 6
  3694. 6
  3695. 6
  3696. 6
  3697. 6
  3698. 6
  3699. 6
  3700. 6
  3701. 6
  3702. 6
  3703. 6
  3704. 6
  3705. 6
  3706. 6
  3707. 6
  3708. 6
  3709. 6
  3710. 6
  3711. 6
  3712. 6
  3713. 6
  3714. 6
  3715. 6
  3716. 6
  3717. 6
  3718. 6
  3719. 6
  3720. 6
  3721. 6
  3722. 6
  3723. 6
  3724. 6
  3725. 6
  3726. 6
  3727. 6
  3728. 6
  3729. 6
  3730. 6
  3731. 6
  3732. 6
  3733. 6
  3734. 6
  3735. 6
  3736. 6
  3737. 6
  3738. 6
  3739. 6
  3740. 6
  3741. 6
  3742. 6
  3743. 6
  3744. 6
  3745. 6
  3746. 6
  3747. 6
  3748. 6
  3749. 6
  3750. 6
  3751. 6
  3752. 6
  3753. 6
  3754. 6
  3755. 6
  3756. 6
  3757. 6
  3758. 6
  3759. 6
  3760. 6
  3761. 6
  3762. 6
  3763. 6
  3764. 6
  3765. 6
  3766. 6
  3767. 6
  3768. 6
  3769. 6
  3770. 6
  3771. 6
  3772. 6
  3773. 6
  3774. 6
  3775. 6
  3776. 6
  3777. 6
  3778. 6
  3779. There are currently 64 countries (out of 195) in the world that criminalise homosexuality. What do these countries (aside from criminalizing homosexuality) have in common? Three factors - economic development (or the lack thereof), democracy (or the lack thereof) and religion - seem to be significant. All or most of these countries are some of the poorest on the planet, have very strong religious leanings (mainly Islam/Christianity) and score very poorly on democracy tables when ranked. Of the 64, 29 are in benighted Africa, 22 in Asia, 5 in the Americas and 7 in Oceania. No country in enlightened Europe has a law against homosexuality. Why would it? 🤷‍♂️ It’s just 2 consenting adults having sex after all, and, last time I checked, that’s really no one (state or individual) else’s business. Europe also has some of the wealthiest countries on Earth, relatively low levels of organised religion and high levels of democracy. Here’s the unholy list of the countries that like to unreasonably, unjustifiably meddle in the sex lives of consenting adults: Africa Algeria Cameroon Chad Comoros Egypt Eritrea Eswatini (Swaziland) Ethiopia Gambia Ghana Guinea Kenya Liberia Libya Malawi Mauritania Morocco Nigeria Senegal Sierra Leone Somalia South Sudan Sudan Tanzania Togo Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe Asia, including the Middle East Afghanistan Bangladesh Brunei Indonesia Iran Iraq Kuwait Lebanon Malaysia Maldives Myanmar Oman Pakistan Palestine Qatar Saudi Arabia Sri Lanka Syria Turkmenistan United Arab Emirates Uzbekistan Yemen Americas Grenada Guyana Jamaica St Lucia St Vincent & the Grenadines Oceania Kiribati Niue Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Tuvalu
    6
  3780. It’s a process. It’s a process whereby gay men and women simply gain the right to have consensual adult sex free of fear of criminalisation involving fines, imprisonment or worse, wherever they are on the planet. The following is a timeline list of when and where homosexuality was decriminalised. This list is interesting as it gives the lie, somewhat, to the idea that decriminalising homosexuality is a wholly (or even a mainly) ‘Western thing’, so apparently feared by lube-head here. To pick some examples at random to demonstrate this: Turkey decriminalised in 1858; Japan in 1882; Taiwan in 1912; Thailand in 1956… while it was as late as 1967 in England/Wales and, remarkably, even later in the country of my birth, Scotland, in 1981. Equally remarkably, it was as late as 1993 before it was decriminalised in Washington DC, another 10 years after this before all the states had decriminalised. Added to this is the notable fact that in the list where homosexuality has never been illegal, almost every single country, without exception, is non-Western. •Never been illegal Aruba, Netherlands Benin Burkina Faso Cambodia Central African Republic Cocos (Keeling) Islands Republic of the Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo Christmas Island, Australia Curaçao Curaçao, Netherlands Djibouti Equatorial Guinea French Polynesia, France Indonesia Ivory Coast Laos Madagascar Mali Mayotte, France Federated States of Micronesia New Caledonia, France Niger North Korea Rwanda Sint Maarten, Netherlands South Korea Philippines Vietnam Wallis and Futuna, France •18th Century 1791: Andorra France Kingdom of France (includes Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique, Réunion, San Barthélemy, Saint Martin, and Saint Pierre and Miquelon) Haiti Saint-Domingue (Haiti) 1793: Monaco 1794: Luxembourg 1795: Belgium 1798: Canton of Geneva, Switzerland Ticino, Switzerland Vaud, Switzerland Valais, Switzerland •19th Century 1811: Netherlands 1822: Dominican Republic El Salvador 1830: Brazil 1832: Bolivia 1853: Argentina 1858: Turkey 1864: San Marino 1869: Suriname 1871: Guatemala Mexico 1882: Japan 1890: Italy Vatican City 1899: Honduras •20th Century 1912: Taiwan 1924: Peru 1933: Denmark (includes Greenland and Faroe Islands) 1932: Poland 1934: Uruguay 1940: Iceland 1942: Switzerland 1944: Sweden 1951: Greece Jordan Palestine 1956: Thailand 1961: Hungary 1962: Czechoslovakia Illinois, United States 1967: England and Wales, United Kingdom 1968: Bulgaria East Germany 1969: Canada West Germany 1971: Austria Connecticut, United States Costa Rica Finland 1972: Colorado, United States Oregon, United States Norway 1973: Delaware, United States Hawaii, United States Malta North Dakota, United States 1974: Massachusetts, United States Ohio, United States 1975: East Timor New Hampshire, United States New Mexico, United States South Australia 1976: Australian Capital Territory Bahrain California, United States Indiana, United States Maine, United States Washington (state), United States West Virginia, United States 1977: Croatia Montenegro Slovenia South Dakota, United States Vermont, United States Wyoming, United States 1978: Guam, United States Iowa, United States Nebraska, United States New Jersey, United States 1979: Cuba Spain 1980: American, United States New York, United States Pennsylvania, United States 1981: Colombia Scotland, United Kingdom Victoria, Australia 1982: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom 1983: Guernsey, United Kingdom Northern Mariana Islands Northern Territory, Australia Portugal Wisconsin, United States 1984: New South Wales, Australia 1985: Virgin Islands, United States 1986: New Zealand 1988: Israel 1989: Falkland Islands, United Kingdom Liechtenstein 1990: Jersey, United Kingdom Paraguay Western Australia 1991: Bahamas Abkhazia Hong Kong Queensland, Australia South Ossetia Ukraine 1992: Estonia Isle of Man, United Kingdom Kentucky, United States Latvia 1993: Washington, D.C. District of Columbia, United States Gibraltar, United Kingdom Guinea-Bissau Republic of Ireland Lithuania Mongolia Nevada Nevada, United States Norfolk Island, Australia Russia 1994: Kosovo Belarus Bermuda Bermuda, United Kingdom Serbia 1995: Albania Moldova 1996: Bosnia and Herzegovina Portuguese Macau North Macedonia Romania Tennessee, United States 1997: China Ecuador Montana, United States Tasmania, Australia Venezuela 1998: Cyprus Cyprus Georgia, United States Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina Rhode Island, United States South Africa Tajikistan 1999: Chile Maryland, United States 2000: Akrotiri and Dhekelia, United Kingdom Azerbaijan Georgia (country) •21st Century 2001: Anguilla, United Kingdom Arizona, United States Bosnia and Herzegovina British Virgin Islands Cayman Islands, United Kingdom Minnesota, United States Montserrat, United Kingdom Saint Helena Pitcairn Islands, United Kingdom Turks and Caicos Islands, United Kingdom 2002: Arkansas, United States Transnistria 2003: Armenia Tokelau, New Zealand United States (nationwide) 2004: Cape Verde 2005: Marshall Islands 2007: Nepal Vanuatu 2008: Nicaragua Panama 2010: Fiji 2012: Lesotho São Tomé and Príncipe 2014: Northern Cyprus Palau 2015: Mozambique 2016: Belize Nauru Seychelles 2018: India Trinidad and Tobago 2019: Botswana 2020: Gabon 2021: Angola Bhutan 2022: Antigua and Barbuda Barbados Singapore Saint Kitts and Nevis 2023: Cook Islands, New Zealand Mauritius 2024: Dominica Namibia
    6
  3781. The Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Act (2023) prescribes up to twenty years in prison for ‘promotion of homosexuality’, life imprisonment for ‘homosexual acts’, and the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’. 1. How, exactly, can you ‘promote’ homosexuality? This isn’t about trying to persuade people to become gay, as if you are trying to persuade people to vote for you, or persuade people to buy a new whizz-bang, fancy-pants vibrator (ijumpjudy has just put in her order - extra batteries included 😉); that’s impossible. It’s not like you can ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. So, primitively prescribing 20 years imprisonment for something you either are or aren’t no matter how much ‘promoting’ is done is bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ 2. There are no such things as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’. If this term refers to anal/oral sex, then, spoiler alert: millions of heterosexuals engage in these acts, too, so to describe them as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’ is bizarre, indeed. Even if we accept that giving/receiving a BJ or having anal sex is a ‘homosexual act’, you’re really going to imprison someone for life for this? 🤦‍♂️ 3. ‘Aggravated homosexuality’ has the death penalty as its punishment and is described as an offence including ‘serial offenders, same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality.’ Ok, let’s break this down: •‘serial offenders’ - presumably this means people who just have consenting sex on many occasions. Death? Bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ •‘same-sex rape’ - as with heterosexual rape, this should obviously be criminalised, but I wouldn’t support death for it. •‘sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation’ - in the case of a position of authority, if the other person consents to the sex, I see no issue with it. If intimidation is involved and no consent given, then this should be criminalised. •‘sex with persons older than 75’ - lol. I see absolutely no reason to criminalise someone for having sex with anyone who is above the age of consent. If that person is 75, 85 or 105, and they consent to the sex, then to institute the death penalty for this is quite bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ •‘sex with the disabled and mentally ill’ - lol. If a disabled gay man or woman wants to have sex, where’s the fucking issue? 🤷‍♂️ Death for this? Yer having a fucking larff, aincha? 🤦‍♂️ Obviously, the mentally ill could be compromised when it comes to consent, so this needs sensitivity. •‘homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality’ - so, if someone has been convicted just once for, say, giving a BJ (which isn’t actually a ‘homosexual act’, as we’ve established there is no such thing) to his partner, and he’s caught doing it again, you kill him? Really? 🤦‍♂️ When you look closely at the Bill, it becomes increasingly ridiculous and barely believable that in 2024 we are criminalising people for simply having consensual adult sex. 🤦‍♂️
    6
  3782. 6
  3783. The Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Act (2023) prescribes up to 20 years in prison for ‘promotion of homosexuality’, life imprisonment for ‘homosexual acts’, and the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’. 1. How, exactly, can you ‘promote’ homosexuality? This isn’t about trying to persuade people to become gay, as if you are trying to persuade people to vote for you, or persuade people to buy a new whizz-bang, fancy-pants vibrator (ijumpjudy has just put in her order - extra batteries included 😉); that’s impossible. It’s not like you can ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. So, primitively prescribing 20 years imprisonment for something you either are or aren’t no matter how much ‘promoting’ is done is bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ 2. There are no such things as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’. If this term refers to anal/oral sex, then, spoiler alert: millions of heterosexuals engage in these acts, too, so to describe them as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’ is stupid and renders the description invalid. Even if we accept that giving/receiving a BJ or having anal sex is a ‘homosexual act’, you’re really going to imprison someone for life for this? 🤦‍♂️ 3. ‘Aggravated homosexuality’ has the death penalty as its punishment and is described as an offence including ‘serial offenders, same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality.’ Ok, let’s break this down: •‘serial offenders’ - presumably this means people who just have consenting sex on many occasions. Death? Don’t be silly. 🤦‍♂️ •‘same-sex rape’ - as with heterosexual rape, this should obviously be criminalised, but I wouldn’t support death for it. •‘sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation’ - in the case of a position of authority, if the other person consents to the sex, I see no issue with it. If intimidation is involved and no consent given, then this should be criminalised. •‘sex with persons older than 75’ - lol. I see absolutely no reason to criminalise someone for having sex with anyone who is above the age of consent. If that person is 75, 85 or 105, and they consent to the sex, then to institute the death penalty for this is quite nonsensical. 🤦‍♂️ •‘sex with the disabled and mentally ill’ - lol. If a disabled gay man or woman wants to have sex, where’s the fucking issue? 🤷‍♂️ Death for this? Yer having a fucking larff, aincha? 🤦‍♂️ Obviously, the mentally ill could be compromised when it comes to consent, so this needs sensitivity. •‘homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality’ - so, if someone has been convicted just once for, say, giving a BJ (which isn’t actually a ‘homosexual act’, as we’ve established there is no such thing) to his partner, and he’s caught doing it again, you kill him? Really? 🤦‍♂️ When you look closely at the Bill, it becomes increasingly ridiculous and barely believable that in 2024 we are criminalising people for simply having consensual adult sex. 🤦‍♂️
    6
  3784. 6
  3785. 6
  3786. 6
  3787. 6
  3788. 6
  3789. Whenever the topic of homophobia arises, I’m always a bit mystified. Why do certain people hate homosexuality with such a vehement passion? Well, religion is clearly the no.1 reason as, in my experience, when questioned the vast majority (90+%) of homosexuality-haters I encounter are holy rollers who believe in this or that unverified and unverifiable invisible sky daddy. In the case of the Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) with their respective books written by men (anecdotally, I find men in my orbit far more likely to be homophobic than women and, tellingly, these same men are often far more forgiving of lesbianism than they are of male-on- male homosexuality), the literalist faithful are required to believe that homosexual sex is sinful and forbidden and by the letter of the holy law actually punishable by death! ( If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. ~ Leviticus 20:13). No.2 is more than likely the classic closeted queer who just can’t accept their feelings and so actively pushes them away, for it is a truth universally acknowledged that those who express irrational homophobic sentiments are quite often repressed homosexuals themselves. Homosexual urges, when repressed out of shame or fear, can (and often are) expressed as homophobia. Freud famously called this process a “reaction formation” - the angry battle against the outward symbol of feelings that are inwardly being stifled. No.3 is the simple lack of basic education. When you grow up in a culture where the most important text is some primitive book written by fallible men 1000s of years ago, you know you’re going to bump up against some stupid, risible opinions which cannot be logically maintained without the appeal to a putatively omnipotent, omniscient ‘God’. In the same book of the Old Testament which institutes death for homosexual acts it also says: Ye shall keep my statutes … neither shall a garment mingled of linen and woollen come upon you. ~ Leviticus 19:19 As I said: stupid and risible. I have many petty prejudices, some rational and some irrational, but hating what someone consensually does sexually isn’t one of them. Hitherto, not one person has given me a single rational reason why I should hate homosexuality. I tend to dislike people and what they do in terms of their ideas, their beliefs, their opinions, their unthinking actions which harm others, their dress-sense etc., but not something over which they have utterly no say or control, and particularly not something which causes no essential harm to another. In this debate, it’s crucial to properly distinguish between ‘offence’ and ‘harm’. You cannot be offended against your will. If you are offended, you play an active role in being offended. A potential offence is offered and you choose whether or not to take that offence. No one can be offended without their own intrinsic consent. On the other hand, you can be harmed against your will. With homosexuality, so many people utterly uninvolved with and unrelated to the given homosexuals seem to be mortally offended. I say: so what? You’re offended. Deal with it. No one is harming you here. It’s none of your business so butt-out. Ultimately, hating homosexuality is like dissing people with a different skin colour. Pointless. Not only pointless, but utterly stupid and moronic, as no one chooses their skin colour, just as no one chooses their sexuality. But here’s the clincher for me: even if we did choose our skin colour and sexuality, it still wouldn’t bother me one iota that some random individual has a different skin colour or sexuality. The sooner we can move beyond this primitive nonsense as a species, the better. To me, being homophobic is a bit like feeling resentful of someone digging Uranus because you’re not an astronomer! 🔭
    6
  3790. 6
  3791. 6
  3792. 6
  3793. 6
  3794. 6
  3795. 6
  3796. 6
  3797. 6
  3798. 6
  3799. 6
  3800. 6
  3801. 6
  3802. 6
  3803. 6
  3804. 6
  3805. 6
  3806. 6
  3807. 6
  3808. 6
  3809. 6
  3810. 6
  3811. 6
  3812. 6
  3813. 6
  3814. 6
  3815. 6
  3816. 6
  3817. 6
  3818. 6
  3819. 6
  3820. 6
  3821. 6
  3822. 6
  3823. 6
  3824. 6
  3825. 6
  3826. 6
  3827. 6
  3828. 6
  3829. 6
  3830. 6
  3831. 6
  3832. 6
  3833. 6
  3834. 6
  3835. 6
  3836. 6
  3837. 6
  3838. 6
  3839. 6
  3840. 6
  3841. 6
  3842. 6
  3843. 6
  3844. 6
  3845. 6
  3846. 6
  3847. 6
  3848. 6
  3849. 6
  3850. 6
  3851. 6
  3852. 6
  3853. 6
  3854. 6
  3855. 6
  3856. 6
  3857. 6
  3858. 6
  3859. 6
  3860. 6
  3861. 6
  3862. 6
  3863. 6
  3864. 6
  3865. 6
  3866. 6
  3867. 6
  3868. 6
  3869. 6
  3870. 6
  3871. 6
  3872. 6
  3873. 6
  3874. 6
  3875. 6
  3876. 6
  3877. 6
  3878. 6
  3879. 6
  3880. 6
  3881. 6
  3882. 6
  3883. 6
  3884. 6
  3885. 6
  3886. 6
  3887. 6
  3888. 6
  3889. 6
  3890. 6
  3891. 6
  3892. 6
  3893. 6
  3894. 6
  3895. 6
  3896. 6
  3897. 6
  3898. 6
  3899. 6
  3900. 6
  3901. 6
  3902. 6
  3903. 6
  3904. 6
  3905. 6
  3906. 6
  3907. 6
  3908. 6
  3909. 6
  3910. 6
  3911. 6
  3912. 6
  3913. 6
  3914. 6
  3915. 6
  3916. 6
  3917. 6
  3918. 6
  3919. 6
  3920. 6
  3921. 6
  3922. 6
  3923. 6
  3924. 6
  3925. 6
  3926. 6
  3927. 6
  3928. 6
  3929. 6
  3930. 6
  3931. 6
  3932. 6
  3933. 6
  3934. 6
  3935. 6
  3936. 6
  3937. 6
  3938. 6
  3939. 6
  3940. 6
  3941. 6
  3942. 6
  3943. 6
  3944. 6
  3945. 6
  3946. 6
  3947. 6
  3948. 6
  3949. 6
  3950. 6
  3951. 6
  3952. 6
  3953. 6
  3954. 6
  3955. 6
  3956. 6
  3957. 6
  3958. 6
  3959. 6
  3960. 6
  3961. 6
  3962. 6
  3963. 6
  3964. 6
  3965. 6
  3966. 6
  3967. 6
  3968. 6
  3969. 6
  3970. 6
  3971. 6
  3972. 6
  3973. 6
  3974. 6
  3975. 6
  3976. 6
  3977. 6
  3978. 6
  3979. 6
  3980. 6
  3981. 6
  3982. 6
  3983. 6
  3984. 6
  3985. 6
  3986. 6
  3987. 6
  3988. 6
  3989. 6
  3990. 6
  3991. 6
  3992. 6
  3993. 6
  3994. 6
  3995. 6
  3996. 6
  3997. 6
  3998. 6
  3999. 6
  4000. 6
  4001. 6
  4002. 6
  4003. 6
  4004. 6
  4005. The biggest mistake Putin has made here was to arrogantly assume a majority of Ukrainians would simply roll over and have their stomachs tickled by the Russians as they rolled in with their tanks. This is the kind of tone-deafness you get when no one has been able to say ‘no’ to one man for 22 years. In a very real sense, the cause of this war rests squarely on Putin’s shoulders and his mad, misguided designs for a greater mother Russia largely conforming to the old USSR. This is why if Putin succeeds in subjugating Ukraine, then Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania should be very afraid. The good news for them (but not the Ukrainians) is that it looks like because of Putin’s arrogance he may be bogged down in Ukraine for years to come, and even if Russia does subjugate Ukraine, that will only be the beginning, as internal resistance to Russia will be immense. Putin’s 5 main demands: 1. Neutral Ukraine with concomitant commitment never to join NATO. 2. Ukraine disarmed. 3. Protection for Russian language in Ukraine. 4. DeNazification of Ukraine. 5. Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine, including the Donbas … for me, these should be seriously considered by Ukraine, to save what very probably will be the utter destruction of the country and the loss of a large proportion of Ukrainians. If and when Russia can move into some kind of post-Putin democracy, then some of these things may be looked at again. Part of me thinks we should humour this nuclear-armed (blackmail? Appeasement? Perhaps) dictator until he has shuffled off this mortal coil.
    6
  4006. 6
  4007. 6
  4008. 6
  4009. 6
  4010. 6
  4011. 6
  4012. 6
  4013. 6
  4014. 6
  4015. 6
  4016. 6
  4017. 6
  4018. 6
  4019. 6
  4020. 6
  4021. 6
  4022. 6
  4023. 6
  4024. 6
  4025. 6
  4026. 6
  4027. 6
  4028. 6
  4029. 6
  4030. 6
  4031. 6
  4032. 6
  4033. 6
  4034. 6
  4035. 6
  4036. 6
  4037. 6
  4038. 6
  4039. 6
  4040. 6
  4041. 6
  4042. 6
  4043. 6
  4044. 6
  4045. 6
  4046. 6
  4047. 6
  4048. 6
  4049. 6
  4050. 6
  4051. 6
  4052. 6
  4053. 6
  4054. 6
  4055. 6
  4056. 6
  4057. 6
  4058. 6
  4059. 6
  4060. 6
  4061. 6
  4062. 6
  4063. 6
  4064. 6
  4065. 6
  4066. 6
  4067. 6
  4068. 6
  4069. 6
  4070. 6
  4071. 6
  4072. 6
  4073. 6
  4074. 6
  4075. 6
  4076. 6
  4077. 6
  4078. 6
  4079. 6
  4080. 6
  4081. 6
  4082. 6
  4083. 6
  4084. 6
  4085. 6
  4086. 6
  4087. 6
  4088. 6
  4089. 6
  4090. 6
  4091. 6
  4092. 6
  4093. 6
  4094. 6
  4095. 6
  4096. 6
  4097. 6
  4098. 6
  4099. 6
  4100. 6
  4101. 6
  4102. 6
  4103. 6
  4104. 6
  4105. 6
  4106. 6
  4107. 6
  4108. 6
  4109. 6
  4110. 6
  4111. 6
  4112. 6
  4113. 6
  4114. 6
  4115. 6
  4116. 6
  4117. 6
  4118. 6
  4119. 6
  4120. 6
  4121. 6
  4122. 6
  4123. 6
  4124. 6
  4125. 6
  4126. 6
  4127. 6
  4128. 6
  4129. 6
  4130. 6
  4131. 6
  4132. 6
  4133. 6
  4134. 6
  4135. 6
  4136. 6
  4137. 6
  4138. 6
  4139. 6
  4140. 6
  4141. 6
  4142. 6
  4143. 6
  4144. 6
  4145. 6
  4146. 6
  4147. 6
  4148. 6
  4149. 6
  4150. 6
  4151. 6
  4152. 6
  4153. 6
  4154. 6
  4155. 6
  4156. 6
  4157. 6
  4158. 6
  4159. 6
  4160. 6
  4161. 6
  4162. 6
  4163. 6
  4164. 6
  4165. 5
  4166. 5
  4167. 5
  4168. 5
  4169. 5
  4170. 5
  4171. 5
  4172. 5
  4173. 5
  4174. 5
  4175. Peace talks in a fantasy world Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Ok, we want Russia to de-nuclearise and committed to not militarising the Russia/Ukraine border.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “We want Russia disarmed to ensure no threat to Ukraine (or anyone else)” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want protection for the Ukrainian language in eastern Ukraine.” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want Russia to emerge from communist dictatorship and come into the light of free, liberal democracies.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “We want Moscow and St Petersburg to be recognised as free Ukrainian cities.” Peace talks in the real world Putin: Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “Done.” Moral of story: Sometimes bullies just get a little of what they want, but never mess with someone by pitching up at their home expecting to take it forcibly, for as Dustin Hoffman going apeshit in Strawdogs has shown: you are unlikely to win.
    5
  4176. 5
  4177. 5
  4178. 5
  4179. 5
  4180. 5
  4181. 5
  4182. 5
  4183. 5
  4184. 5
  4185. 5
  4186. 5
  4187. 5
  4188. 5
  4189. 5
  4190. 5
  4191. 5
  4192. 5
  4193. 5
  4194. 5
  4195. 5
  4196. 5
  4197. 5
  4198. 5
  4199. 5
  4200. 5
  4201. 5
  4202. 5
  4203. 5
  4204. 5
  4205. 5
  4206. 5
  4207. 5
  4208. 5
  4209. 5
  4210. 5
  4211. 5
  4212. 5
  4213. 5
  4214. 5
  4215. 5
  4216. 5
  4217. 5
  4218. 5
  4219. 5
  4220. 5
  4221. 5
  4222. 5
  4223. 5
  4224. 5
  4225. 5
  4226. 5
  4227. 5
  4228. 5
  4229. 5
  4230. 5
  4231. 5
  4232. 5
  4233. 5
  4234. 5
  4235. 5
  4236. 5
  4237. 5
  4238. 5
  4239. 5
  4240. 5
  4241. 5
  4242. 5
  4243. 5
  4244. 5
  4245. 5
  4246. 5
  4247. 5
  4248. 5
  4249. 5
  4250. 5
  4251. 5
  4252. 5
  4253. 5
  4254. 5
  4255. ⛄️ Mad stuff! With all these extremes from season to season, they may have to alter the State names accordingly 🌴: Squallabama 🥶 Alabalmy 😎 Alaskia 🥶 Baked Alaska 😎 Arizsnowa 🥶 Aridzona 😎 Arkanthaw 🥶 Arkansawdust 😎 Califognia 🥶 Tropicalifornia 😎 Coolorado 🥶 Swimmingpoolorado 😎 Connecticold 🥶 Airconnecticut 😎 Delaglare 🥶 Delabare 😎 Flurryda 🥶 Torrida 😎 Georjackfrost 🥶 Scorchia 😎 Thawaii 🥶 Hawaheat 😎 Slideaho 🥶 Humidaho 😎 Chillinois 🥶 Grillinois 😎 Windiana 🥶 Indianaked 😎 Iowhiteout 🥶 Lilowa 😎 Kansice 🥶 Tansas 😎 Godforsakentucky🥶Kensunstrucky 😎 Louicyana 🥶 Loubeesiana 😎 Mainedeer 🥶 Maineshine 😎 Buryland 🥶 Marysand 😎 Massachillsetts🥶Sunmaskachusetts 😎 Michighandwarmers 🥶Mitchygan 😎 Mittensota 🥶 Manitshota! 😎 Missiceslippy 🥶 Missicecreamy 😎 Missfury 🥶 Blissouri 😎 Montanavalanche 🥶 Montfana 😎 Nebbbrrraska 🥶 Nebaska 😎 Nevada ~ already means Neveranda 😎 ‘snowy mountains’ 🥶 New Hampshiver 🥶 New Hampfire 😎 Blew Jersey 🥶 Phew! Jersey 😎 New Mexicool 🥶 Stew Mexico 😎 Snowshoe York 🥶 Tennisshoe York😎 North/South Barrelina 🥶North/South Camelina😎 North/South Dacoata 🥶North/South Dakhota 😎 Snowhio 🥶 Ohsigho 😎 Oklabomba 🥶 Sunstrokelahoma 😎 Thawregon 🥶 Oregoneoff 😎 Pennsylweathervania🥶Pennsnilrainia 😎 Rhode Iceland 🥶 Rhode Dryland 😎 Tennessleet 🥶 Tennessteamy 😎 Texice 🥶 Texass 😎 Uthaw 🥶 Blutah 😎 Shivermont 🥶 Heatwavermont 😎 Frozen Riverginia 🥶 Virginiasling 😎 Washingtoboggan 🥶 Washingsun 😎 Rawest Virginia 🥶 Sweat Virginia 😎 Wicesconsin 🥶 Wisconsunburn 😎 Wysnowing 🥶 Fryoming 😎
    5
  4256. 5
  4257. 5
  4258. 5
  4259. 5
  4260. 5
  4261. 5
  4262. 5
  4263. 5
  4264. 5
  4265. 5
  4266. 5
  4267. 5
  4268. 5
  4269. 5
  4270. 5
  4271. 5
  4272. 5
  4273. 5
  4274. 5
  4275. 5
  4276. 5
  4277. 5
  4278. 5
  4279. 5
  4280. 5
  4281. 5
  4282. 5
  4283. 5
  4284. 5
  4285. 5
  4286. 5
  4287. 5
  4288. 5
  4289. 5
  4290. 5
  4291. 5
  4292. 5
  4293. 5
  4294. 5
  4295. 5
  4296. 5
  4297. 5
  4298. 5
  4299. 5
  4300. 5
  4301. 5
  4302. 5
  4303. 5
  4304. 5
  4305. 5
  4306. 5
  4307. 5
  4308. 5
  4309. 5
  4310. 5
  4311. 5
  4312. 5
  4313. 5
  4314. 5
  4315. 5
  4316. 5
  4317. 5
  4318. 5
  4319. 5
  4320. 5
  4321. 5
  4322. 5
  4323. 5
  4324. 5
  4325. 5
  4326. 5
  4327. 5
  4328. 5
  4329. 5
  4330. 5
  4331. 5
  4332. 5
  4333. 5
  4334. 5
  4335. 5
  4336. 5
  4337. 5
  4338. 5
  4339. 5
  4340. 5
  4341. 5
  4342. 5
  4343. 5
  4344. 5
  4345. 5
  4346. 5
  4347. ⛄️ Mad stuff! With all these extremes from season to season, they may have to alter the State names accordingly 🌴: Squallabama 🥶 Alabalmy 😎 Alaskia 🥶 Baked Alaska 😎 Arizsnowa 🥶 Aridzona 😎 Arkanthaw 🥶 Arkansawdust 😎 Califognia 🥶 Tropicalifornia 😎 Coolorado 🥶 Swimmingpoolorado 😎 Connecticold 🥶 Airconnecticut 😎 Delaglare 🥶 Delabare 😎 Flurryda 🥶 Torrida 😎 Georjackfrost 🥶 Scorchia 😎 Thawaii 🥶 Hawaheat 😎 Slideaho 🥶 Humidaho 😎 Chillinois 🥶 Grillinois 😎 Windiana 🥶 Indianaked 😎 Iowhiteout 🥶 Lilowa 😎 Kansice 🥶 Tansas 😎 Godforsakentucky🥶Kensunstrucky 😎 Louicyana 🥶 Loubeesiana 😎 Mainedeer 🥶 Maineshine 😎 Buryland 🥶 Marysand 😎 Massachillsetts🥶Sunmaskachusetts 😎 Michighandwarmers 🥶Mitchygan 😎 Mittensota 🥶 Manitshota! 😎 Missiceslippy 🥶 Missicecreamy 😎 Missfury 🥶 Blissouri 😎 Montanavalanche 🥶 Montfana 😎 Nebbbrrraska 🥶 Nebaska 😎 Nevada ~ already means Neveranda 😎 ‘snowy mountains’ 🥶 New Hampshiver 🥶 New Hampfire 😎 Blew Jersey 🥶 Phew! Jersey 😎 New Mexicool 🥶 Stew Mexico 😎 Snowshoe York 🥶 Tennisshoe York😎 North/South Barrelina 🥶North/South Camelina😎 North/South Dacoata 🥶North/South Dakhota 😎 Snowhio 🥶 Ohsigho 😎 Oklabomba 🥶 Sunstrokelahoma 😎 Thawregon 🥶 Oregoneoff 😎 Pennsylweathervania🥶Pennsnilrainia 😎 Rhode Iceland 🥶 Rhode Dryland 😎 Tennessleet 🥶 Tennessteamy 😎 Texice 🥶 Texass 😎 Uthaw 🥶 Blutah 😎 Shivermont 🥶 Heatwavermont 😎 Frozen Riverginia 🥶 Virginiasling 😎 Washingtoboggan 🥶 Washingsun 😎 Rawest Virginia 🥶 Sweat Virginia 😎 Wicesconsin 🥶 Wisconsunburn 😎 Wysnowing 🥶 Fryoming 😎
    5
  4348. 5
  4349. 5
  4350. 5
  4351. 5
  4352. 5
  4353. 5
  4354. 5
  4355. 5
  4356. 5
  4357. 5
  4358. 5
  4359. 5
  4360. 5
  4361. 5
  4362. 5
  4363. 5
  4364. 5
  4365. 5
  4366. 5
  4367. 5
  4368. 5
  4369. 5
  4370. 5
  4371. 5
  4372. 5
  4373. 5
  4374. 5
  4375. 5
  4376. 5
  4377. 5
  4378. 5
  4379. 5
  4380. 5
  4381. 5
  4382. 5
  4383. 5
  4384. 5
  4385. 5
  4386. 5
  4387. 5
  4388. 5
  4389. 5
  4390. 5
  4391. 5
  4392. 5
  4393. 5
  4394. 5
  4395. 5
  4396. 5
  4397. 5
  4398. 5
  4399. 5
  4400. 5
  4401. 5
  4402. 5
  4403. 5
  4404. 5
  4405. 5
  4406. 5
  4407. 5
  4408. 5
  4409. 5
  4410. 5
  4411. 5
  4412. 5
  4413. 5
  4414. 5
  4415. 5
  4416. 5
  4417. 5
  4418. 5
  4419. 5
  4420. 5
  4421. 5
  4422. 5
  4423. The biggest mistake Putin has made here was to arrogantly assume a majority of Ukrainians would simply roll over and have their stomachs tickled by the Russians as they rolled in with their tanks. This is the kind of tone-deafness you get when no one has been able to say ‘no’ to one man for 22 years. In a very real sense, the cause of this war rests squarely on Putin’s shoulders and his mad, misguided designs for a greater mother Russia largely conforming to the old USSR. This is why if Putin succeeds in subjugating Ukraine, then Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania should be very afraid. The good news for them (but not the Ukrainians) is that it looks like because of Putin’s arrogance he may be bogged down in Ukraine for years to come, and even if Russia does subjugate Ukraine, that will only be the beginning, as internal resistance to Russia will be immense. Putin’s 5 main demands: 1. Neutral Ukraine with concomitant commitment never to join NATO. 2. Ukraine disarmed. 3. Protection for Russian language in Ukraine. 4. DeNazification of Ukraine. 5. Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine, including the Donbas … for me, these should be seriously considered by Ukraine, to save what very probably will be the utter destruction of the country and the loss of a large proportion of Ukrainians. If and when Russia can move into some kind of post-Putin democracy, then some of these things may be looked at again. Part of me thinks we should humour this nuclear-armed (blackmail? Appeasement? Perhaps) dictator until he has shuffled off this mortal coil.
    5
  4424. 5
  4425. 5
  4426. 5
  4427. 5
  4428. 5
  4429. 5
  4430. 5
  4431. 5
  4432. 5
  4433. 5
  4434. 5
  4435. 5
  4436. 5
  4437. 5
  4438. 5
  4439. 5
  4440. 5
  4441. 5
  4442. Peace talks in a fantasy world Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Ok, we want Russia to de-nuclearise and committed to not militarising the Russia/Ukraine border.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “We want Russia disarmed to ensure no threat to Ukraine (or anyone else)” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want protection for the Ukrainian language in eastern Ukraine.” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want Russia to emerge from communist dictatorship and come into the light of free, liberal democracies.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “We want Moscow and St Petersburg to be recognised as free Ukrainian cities.” Peace talks in the real world Putin: Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “Done.” Moral of story: Sometimes bullies just get a little of what they want, but never mess with someone by pitching up at their home expecting to take it forcibly, for as Dustin Hoffman going apeshit in Strawdogs has shown: you are unlikely to win.
    5
  4443. 5
  4444. 5
  4445. 5
  4446. 5
  4447. 5
  4448. 5
  4449. It’s a process. It’s a process whereby gay men and women simply gain the right to have consensual adult sex free of fear of criminalisation involving fines, imprisonment or worse, wherever they are on the planet. The following is a timeline list of when and where homosexuality was decriminalised. This list is interesting as it gives the lie, somewhat, to the idea that decriminalising homosexuality is a wholly (or even a mainly) ‘Western thing’, so apparently feared by lube-head here. To pick some examples at random to demonstrate this: Turkey decriminalised in 1858; Japan in 1882; Taiwan in 1912; Thailand in 1956… while it was as late as 1967 in England/Wales and, remarkably, even later in the country of my birth, Scotland, in 1981. Equally remarkably, it was as late as 1993 before it was decriminalised in Washington DC, another 10 years after this before all the states had decriminalised. Added to this is the notable fact that in the list where homosexuality has never been illegal, almost every single country, without exception, is non-Western. •Never been illegal Aruba, Netherlands Benin Burkina Faso Cambodia Central African Republic Cocos (Keeling) Islands Republic of the Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo Christmas Island, Australia Curaçao Curaçao, Netherlands Djibouti Equatorial Guinea French Polynesia, France Indonesia Ivory Coast Laos Madagascar Mali Mayotte, France Federated States of Micronesia New Caledonia, France Niger North Korea Rwanda Sint Maarten, Netherlands South Korea Philippines Vietnam Wallis and Futuna, France •18th Century 1791: Andorra France Kingdom of France (includes Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique, Réunion, San Barthélemy, Saint Martin, and Saint Pierre and Miquelon) Haiti Saint-Domingue (Haiti) 1793: Monaco 1794: Luxembourg 1795: Belgium 1798: Canton of Geneva, Switzerland Ticino, Switzerland Vaud, Switzerland Valais, Switzerland •19th Century 1811: Netherlands 1822: Dominican Republic El Salvador 1830: Brazil 1832: Bolivia 1853: Argentina 1858: Turkey 1864: San Marino 1869: Suriname 1871: Guatemala Mexico 1882: Japan 1890: Italy Vatican City 1899: Honduras •20th Century 1912: Taiwan 1924: Peru 1933: Denmark (includes Greenland and Faroe Islands) 1932: Poland 1934: Uruguay 1940: Iceland 1942: Switzerland 1944: Sweden 1951: Greece Jordan Palestine 1956: Thailand 1961: Hungary 1962: Czechoslovakia Illinois, United States 1967: England and Wales, United Kingdom 1968: Bulgaria East Germany 1969: Canada West Germany 1971: Austria Connecticut, United States Costa Rica Finland 1972: Colorado, United States Oregon, United States Norway 1973: Delaware, United States Hawaii, United States Malta North Dakota, United States 1974: Massachusetts, United States Ohio, United States 1975: East Timor New Hampshire, United States New Mexico, United States South Australia 1976: Australian Capital Territory Bahrain California, United States Indiana, United States Maine, United States Washington (state), United States West Virginia, United States 1977: Croatia Montenegro Slovenia South Dakota, United States Vermont, United States Wyoming, United States 1978: Guam, United States Iowa, United States Nebraska, United States New Jersey, United States 1979: Cuba Spain 1980: American, United States New York, United States Pennsylvania, United States 1981: Colombia Scotland, United Kingdom Victoria, Australia 1982: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom 1983: Guernsey, United Kingdom Northern Mariana Islands Northern Territory, Australia Portugal Wisconsin, United States 1984: New South Wales, Australia 1985: Virgin Islands, United States 1986: New Zealand 1988: Israel 1989: Falkland Islands, United Kingdom Liechtenstein 1990: Jersey, United Kingdom Paraguay Western Australia 1991: Bahamas Abkhazia Hong Kong Queensland, Australia South Ossetia Ukraine 1992: Estonia Isle of Man, United Kingdom Kentucky, United States Latvia 1993: Washington, D.C. District of Columbia, United States Gibraltar, United Kingdom Guinea-Bissau Republic of Ireland Lithuania Mongolia Nevada Nevada, United States Norfolk Island, Australia Russia 1994: Kosovo Belarus Bermuda Bermuda, United Kingdom Serbia 1995: Albania Moldova 1996: Bosnia and Herzegovina Portuguese Macau North Macedonia Romania Tennessee, United States 1997: China Ecuador Montana, United States Tasmania, Australia Venezuela 1998: Cyprus Cyprus Georgia, United States Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina Rhode Island, United States South Africa Tajikistan 1999: Chile Maryland, United States 2000: Akrotiri and Dhekelia, United Kingdom Azerbaijan Georgia (country) •21st Century 2001: Anguilla, United Kingdom Arizona, United States Bosnia and Herzegovina British Virgin Islands Cayman Islands, United Kingdom Minnesota, United States Montserrat, United Kingdom Saint Helena Pitcairn Islands, United Kingdom Turks and Caicos Islands, United Kingdom 2002: Arkansas, United States Transnistria 2003: Armenia Tokelau, New Zealand United States (nationwide) 2004: Cape Verde 2005: Marshall Islands 2007: Nepal Vanuatu 2008: Nicaragua Panama 2010: Fiji 2012: Lesotho São Tomé and Príncipe 2014: Northern Cyprus Palau 2015: Mozambique 2016: Belize Nauru Seychelles 2018: India Trinidad and Tobago 2019: Botswana 2020: Gabon 2021: Angola Bhutan 2022: Antigua and Barbuda Barbados Singapore Saint Kitts and Nevis 2023: Cook Islands, New Zealand Mauritius 2024: Dominica Namibia
    5
  4450. 5
  4451. 5
  4452. 5
  4453. 5
  4454. 5
  4455. 5
  4456. 5
  4457. 5
  4458. 5
  4459. 5
  4460. 5
  4461. 5
  4462. 5
  4463. 5
  4464. 5
  4465. 5
  4466. 5
  4467. 5
  4468. 5
  4469. 5
  4470. 5
  4471. 5
  4472. 5
  4473. 5
  4474. So, why might people have a downer on homosexuality? •It is ‘unnatural’ - All the research (both scientific and anecdotal) overwhelmingly indicates that sexuality isn’t a choice. The vast majority of us, if we are honest, will attest we were romantically/sexually attracted to others very early (and, conversely, not attracted to others) and no volitional choice, as such, was involved in this attraction. In my own case, I knew when I was about 4 that I fancied girls. •Being gay is a ‘sin’ - This argument is just a non-starter, really, given that presumably this ‘sin’ was ordained by ‘God’, and as that ‘God’ hasn’t been verified (manmade written texts don’t count), then using the ‘it’s a sin’ argument won’t float. •Being gay is, somehow, ‘transmissible’ - This one is ridiculous. You can’t ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. Or, for that matter, you are bisexual, or you aren’t. Those against homosexuality never use this one the other way: Gay people are surrounded by heterosexual culture 24/7/365. Gays are simply assumed to be heterosexual until they state that they are not. Every example, with a very few exceptions, of love & romance in our media is heterosexual. Given this saturation, you’d think all of this exposure to hetty culture might ‘turn’ gays heterosexual, but it doesn’t. It doesn’t in exactly the same way that exposing heterosexuals to gays/gay culture ‘turns’ them, because with sexuality, we just are, and from a pretty early age. •Gays have an agenda - Of all the arguments I have heard against homosexuality, this is the only one that might be seen to hold some water, not because it’s a moral argument, as such, but because I can understand why people might not be particularly keen to have what they perceive as ‘gay issues’ shoved down their throats, for want of a better phrase. Even as someone who has zero moral issue with homosexuality, this modern-day aspect of the topic can be annoying. However, it should be pointed out, that those gays who are politically motivated represent a minuscule (<1%) rump of activists heard and seen out of all proportion to their size; meanwhile, the vast majority of gays are simply quietly living their lives unseen and unheard and bothering no one. •What gays actually do in the bedroom is ‘disgusting’ - Well, this is clearly subjective. Museveni seems to think it’s ‘disgusting’, even though he laughably claimed he never knew what they did! In terms of criminality, this is rather simple: if you are going to criminalise consenting adults for performing ‘disgusting’ bedroom antics (i.e. anal/oral sex), then you need to apply this law consistently and criminalise the millions of consenting heterosexual adults having anal/oral sex. If this isn’t done, and heterosexuals are treated in exactly the same way by the law vis-à-vis anal/oral sex, then you can be sure this is just about irrationally criminalising a minority whose behaviours you are personally ‘disgusted’ by. Conclusion: No one, hitherto, has given me a single, rational, credible reason as to why I should support the criminalisation of gay sex.
    5
  4475. 5
  4476. 5
  4477. 5
  4478. 5
  4479. 5
  4480. 5
  4481. 5
  4482. 5
  4483. 5
  4484. 5
  4485. 5
  4486. 5
  4487. 5
  4488. The Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Act (2023) prescribes up to twenty years in prison for ‘promotion of homosexuality’, life imprisonment for ‘homosexual acts’, and the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’. 1. How, exactly, can you ‘promote’ homosexuality? This isn’t about trying to persuade people to become gay, as if you are trying to persuade people to vote for you, or persuade people to buy a new whizz-bang, fancy-pants vibrator (ijumpjudy has just put in her order - extra batteries included 😉); that’s impossible. It’s not like you can ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. So, primitively prescribing 20 years imprisonment for something you either are or aren’t no matter how much ‘promoting’ is done is bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ 2. There are no such things as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’. If this term refers to anal/oral sex, then, spoiler alert: millions of heterosexuals engage in these acts, too, so to describe them as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’ is bizarre, indeed. Even if we accept that giving/receiving a BJ or having anal sex is a ‘homosexual act’, you’re really going to imprison someone for life for this? 🤦‍♂️ 3. ‘Aggravated homosexuality’ has the death penalty as its punishment and is described as an offence including ‘serial offenders, same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality.’ Ok, let’s break this down: •‘serial offenders’ - presumably this means people who just have consenting sex on many occasions. Death? Bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ •‘same-sex rape’ - as with heterosexual rape, this should obviously be criminalised, but I wouldn’t support death for it. •‘sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation’ - in the case of a position of authority, if the other person consents to the sex, I see no issue with it. If intimidation is involved and no consent given, then this should be criminalised. •‘sex with persons older than 75’ - lol. I see absolutely no reason to criminalise someone for having sex with anyone who is above the age of consent. If that person is 75, 85 or 105, and they consent to the sex, then to institute the death penalty for this is quite bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ •‘sex with the disabled and mentally ill’ - lol. If a disabled gay man or woman wants to have sex, where’s the fucking issue? 🤷‍♂️ Death for this? Yer having a fucking larff, aincha? 🤦‍♂️ Obviously, the mentally ill could be compromised when it comes to consent, so this needs sensitivity. •‘homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality’ - so, if someone has been convicted just once for, say, giving a BJ (which isn’t actually a ‘homosexual act’, as we’ve established there is no such thing) to his partner, and he’s caught doing it again, you kill him? Really? 🤦‍♂️ When you look closely at the Bill, it becomes increasingly ridiculous and barely believable that in 2024 we are criminalising people for simply having consensual adult sex. 🤦‍♂️
    5
  4489. 5
  4490. 5
  4491. 5
  4492. 5
  4493. 5
  4494. 5
  4495. 5
  4496. 5
  4497. 5
  4498. 5
  4499. 5
  4500. 5
  4501. 5
  4502. 5
  4503. 5
  4504. 5
  4505. 5
  4506. 5
  4507. 5
  4508. 5
  4509. 5
  4510. 5
  4511. 5
  4512. 5
  4513. 5
  4514. 5
  4515. 5
  4516. 5
  4517. 5
  4518. 5
  4519. 5
  4520. 5
  4521. 5
  4522. 5
  4523. 5
  4524. 5
  4525. 5
  4526. 5
  4527. 5
  4528. 5
  4529. 5
  4530. 5
  4531. 5
  4532. 5
  4533. 5
  4534. 5
  4535. 5
  4536. 5
  4537. 5
  4538. 5
  4539. 5
  4540. 5
  4541. 5
  4542. 5
  4543. 5
  4544. 5
  4545. 5
  4546. 5
  4547. 5
  4548. 5
  4549. 5
  4550. 5
  4551. 5
  4552. 5
  4553. 5
  4554. 5
  4555. 5
  4556. 5
  4557. 5
  4558. 5
  4559. 5
  4560. 5
  4561. 5
  4562. 5
  4563. 5
  4564. 5
  4565. 5
  4566. 5
  4567. 5
  4568. 5
  4569. 5
  4570. 5
  4571. 5
  4572. 5
  4573. 5
  4574. 5
  4575. 5
  4576. 5
  4577. 5
  4578. 5
  4579. 5
  4580. 5
  4581. 5
  4582. 5
  4583. 5
  4584. 5
  4585. 5
  4586. 5
  4587. 5
  4588. 5
  4589. 5
  4590. 5
  4591. 5
  4592. 5
  4593. 5
  4594. 5
  4595. 5
  4596. 5
  4597. 5
  4598. 5
  4599. 5
  4600. 5
  4601. 5
  4602. 5
  4603. 5
  4604. 5
  4605. 5
  4606. 5
  4607. 5
  4608. 5
  4609. 5
  4610. 5
  4611. 5
  4612. 5
  4613. 5
  4614. 5
  4615. 5
  4616. 5
  4617. 5
  4618. 5
  4619. 5
  4620. 5
  4621. 5
  4622. Why do so many other developed nations not have America’s baleful gun culture? Germany, the UK, Japan, for example, don’t seem to have this terrible issue with gun crime, and yet there is relative peace in terms of general society, and certainly mass killings are rare. America needs to seriously look at its Second Amendment. There are only three countries that have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms: Mexico, Guatemala, and the United States. Although Mexico and Guatemala both have a constitutional right to bear arms, the US is in a league of its own simply because it is the only country without restrictions on gun ownership in its constitution. After the Second Amendment was adopted in 1791 (and even then it was only militia set-ups allowed to own a gun; not the individual private citizen), it inspired other countries around the world to provide their citizens with the right to own guns. However, only 15 constitutions (in nine countries) ever included an explicit right to bear arms. They are Bolivia, Costa Rica, Colombia, Honduras, Nicaragua, Liberia, Guatemala, Mexico, and the US. All of those countries, excluding Mexico, the US, and Guatemala, have since rescinded the constitutional right to bear arms. So, America is the outlier here in terms of citizens’ rights to bear arms. Does it want to continue this, and put up with its horrible mass killings? Or does it want to consider repealing the Second Amendment, thereby allowing the average American citizen to breathe that much easier in the ‘land of the free’?
    5
  4623. 5
  4624. 5
  4625. 5
  4626. 5
  4627. 5
  4628. 5
  4629. 5
  4630. 5
  4631. 5
  4632. 5
  4633. 5
  4634. 5
  4635. 5
  4636. 5
  4637. 5
  4638. 5
  4639. 5
  4640. 5
  4641. 5
  4642. 5
  4643. 5
  4644. 5
  4645. 5
  4646. 5
  4647. 5
  4648. 5
  4649. 5
  4650. 5
  4651. 5
  4652. 5
  4653. 5
  4654. 5
  4655. 5
  4656. 5
  4657. 5
  4658. 5
  4659. 5
  4660. 5
  4661. 5
  4662. 5
  4663. 5
  4664. 5
  4665. 5
  4666. 5
  4667. 5
  4668. 5
  4669. 5
  4670. 5
  4671. 5
  4672. 5
  4673. 5
  4674. 5
  4675. 5
  4676. 5
  4677. 5
  4678. 5
  4679. 5
  4680. 5
  4681. 5
  4682. 5
  4683. 5
  4684. 5
  4685. 5
  4686. 5
  4687. 5
  4688. 5
  4689. 5
  4690. 5
  4691. 5
  4692. 5
  4693. 5
  4694. 5
  4695. 5
  4696. 5
  4697. 5
  4698. 5
  4699. 5
  4700. 5
  4701. 5
  4702. 5
  4703. 5
  4704. 5
  4705. 5
  4706. 5
  4707. 5
  4708. 5
  4709. 5
  4710. 5
  4711. 5
  4712. 5
  4713. 5
  4714. 5
  4715. 5
  4716. 5
  4717. 5
  4718. 5
  4719. 5
  4720. 5
  4721. 5
  4722. 5
  4723. 5
  4724. 5
  4725. 5
  4726. 5
  4727. 5
  4728. 5
  4729. 5
  4730. 5
  4731. 5
  4732. 5
  4733. 5
  4734. 5
  4735. 5
  4736. 5
  4737. 5
  4738. 5
  4739. 5
  4740. 5
  4741. 5
  4742. 5
  4743. 5
  4744. 5
  4745. Peace talks in a fantasy world Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Ok, we want Russia to de-nuclearise and committed to not militarising the Russia/Ukraine border.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “We want Russia disarmed to ensure no threat to Ukraine (or anyone else)” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want protection for the Ukrainian language in eastern Ukraine.” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want Russia to emerge from communist dictatorship and come into the light of free, liberal democracies.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “We want Moscow and St Petersburg to be recognised as free Ukrainian cities.” Peace talks in the real world Putin: Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “Done.” Moral of story: Sometimes bullies just get a little of what they want, but never mess with someone by pitching up at their home expecting to take it forcibly, for as Dustin Hoffman going apeshit in Strawdogs has shown: you are unlikely to win.
    5
  4746. 5
  4747. 5
  4748. 5
  4749. 5
  4750. 5
  4751. 5
  4752. 5
  4753. 5
  4754. 5
  4755. 5
  4756. 5
  4757. 5
  4758. 5
  4759. 5
  4760. 5
  4761. 5
  4762. 5
  4763. 5
  4764. 5
  4765. 5
  4766. 5
  4767. 5
  4768. 5
  4769. 5
  4770. 5
  4771. 5
  4772. 5
  4773. 5
  4774. 5
  4775. 5
  4776. 5
  4777. 5
  4778. 5
  4779. 5
  4780. 5
  4781. 5
  4782. 5
  4783. 5
  4784. 5
  4785. 5
  4786. 5
  4787. 5
  4788. 5
  4789. 5
  4790. 5
  4791. 5
  4792. 5
  4793. 5
  4794. 5
  4795. 5
  4796. 5
  4797. 5
  4798. 5
  4799. 5
  4800. 5
  4801. 5
  4802. 5
  4803. 5
  4804. 5
  4805. 5
  4806. 5
  4807. 5
  4808. 5
  4809. 5
  4810. 5
  4811. 5
  4812. 5
  4813. 5
  4814. 5
  4815. 5
  4816. 5
  4817. 5
  4818. 5
  4819. 5
  4820. 5
  4821. 5
  4822. 5
  4823. 5
  4824. 5
  4825. 5
  4826. 5
  4827. 5
  4828. 5
  4829. 5
  4830. 5
  4831. 5
  4832. 5
  4833. 5
  4834. 5
  4835. 5
  4836. 5
  4837. 5
  4838. 5
  4839. 5
  4840. 5
  4841. 5
  4842. 5
  4843. 5
  4844. 5
  4845. 5
  4846. 5
  4847. 5
  4848. 5
  4849. 5
  4850. 5
  4851. 5
  4852. 5
  4853. 5
  4854. 5
  4855. 5
  4856. 5
  4857. 5
  4858. 5
  4859. 5
  4860. 5
  4861. 5
  4862. 5
  4863. 5
  4864. 5
  4865. 5
  4866. 5
  4867. 5
  4868. 5
  4869. 5
  4870. 5
  4871. 5
  4872. 5
  4873. 5
  4874. 5
  4875. 5
  4876. 5
  4877. 5
  4878. 5
  4879. 5
  4880. Peace talks in a fantasy world Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Ok, we want Russia to de-nuclearise and committed to not militarising the Russia/Ukraine border.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “We want Russia disarmed to ensure no threat to Ukraine (or anyone else)” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want protection for the Ukrainian language in eastern Ukraine.” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want Russia to emerge from communist dictatorship and come into the light of free, liberal democracies.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “We want Moscow and St Petersburg to be recognised as free Ukrainian cities.” Peace talks in the real world Putin: Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “Done.” Moral of story: Sometimes bullies just get a little of what they want, but never mess with someone by pitching up at their home expecting to take it forcibly, for as Dustin Hoffman going apeshit in Strawdogs has shown: you are unlikely to win.
    5
  4881. 5
  4882. 5
  4883. 5
  4884. 5
  4885. 5
  4886. 5
  4887. 5
  4888. 5
  4889. 5
  4890. 5
  4891. 5
  4892. 5
  4893. 5
  4894. 5
  4895. 5
  4896. 5
  4897. 5
  4898. 5
  4899. 5
  4900. 5
  4901. 5
  4902. 5
  4903. 5
  4904. 5
  4905. 5
  4906. 5
  4907. 5
  4908. 5
  4909. 5
  4910. 5
  4911. 5
  4912. 5
  4913. 5
  4914. 5
  4915. 5
  4916. 5
  4917. 5
  4918. 5
  4919. 5
  4920. 5
  4921. 5
  4922. 5
  4923. 5
  4924. 5
  4925. 5
  4926. 5
  4927. 5
  4928. 5
  4929. 5
  4930. 5
  4931. 5
  4932. 5
  4933. 5
  4934. 5
  4935. 5
  4936. 5
  4937. 5
  4938. 5
  4939. 5
  4940. 5
  4941. 5
  4942. 5
  4943. 5
  4944. 5
  4945. 5
  4946. 5
  4947. 5
  4948. 5
  4949. 5
  4950. 5
  4951. 5
  4952. 5
  4953. 5
  4954. 5
  4955. 5
  4956. 5
  4957. 5
  4958. 5
  4959. 5
  4960. 5
  4961. 5
  4962. 5
  4963. 5
  4964. 5
  4965. 5
  4966. 5
  4967. 5
  4968. 5
  4969. 5
  4970. 5
  4971. 5
  4972. 5
  4973. 5
  4974. 5
  4975. 5
  4976. 5
  4977. 5
  4978. 5
  4979. 5
  4980. 5
  4981. 5
  4982. 5
  4983. 5
  4984. 5
  4985. 5
  4986. 5
  4987. 5
  4988. 5
  4989. 5
  4990. 5
  4991. 5
  4992. 5
  4993. 5
  4994. 5
  4995. 5
  4996. 5
  4997. 5
  4998. 5
  4999. 5
  5000. 5
  5001. 5
  5002. 5
  5003. 5
  5004. 5
  5005. 5
  5006. 5
  5007. 5
  5008. 5
  5009. 5
  5010. 5
  5011. 5
  5012. 5
  5013. 5
  5014. 5
  5015. 5
  5016. 5
  5017. 5
  5018. 5
  5019. 4
  5020. 4
  5021. 4
  5022. 4
  5023. 4
  5024. 4
  5025. 4
  5026. 4
  5027. 4
  5028. 4
  5029. 4
  5030. 4
  5031. 4
  5032. 4
  5033. 4
  5034. 4
  5035. 4
  5036. 4
  5037. 4
  5038. 4
  5039. 4
  5040. 4
  5041. 4
  5042. 4
  5043. 4
  5044. 4
  5045. 4
  5046. 4
  5047. 4
  5048. 4
  5049. 4
  5050. 4
  5051. 4
  5052. 4
  5053. 4
  5054. 4
  5055. 4
  5056. 4
  5057. 4
  5058. 4
  5059. 4
  5060. 4
  5061. 4
  5062. 4
  5063. 4
  5064. 4
  5065. 4
  5066. 4
  5067. 4
  5068. 4
  5069. 4
  5070. 4
  5071. 4
  5072. 4
  5073. 4
  5074. 4
  5075. 4
  5076. 4
  5077. 4
  5078. 4
  5079. 4
  5080. 4
  5081. 4
  5082. 4
  5083. 4
  5084. 4
  5085. 4
  5086. 4
  5087. 4
  5088. 4
  5089. 4
  5090. 4
  5091. 4
  5092. 4
  5093. 4
  5094. 4
  5095. 4
  5096. 4
  5097. 4
  5098. 4
  5099. 4
  5100. 4
  5101. 4
  5102. 4
  5103. 4
  5104. 4
  5105. 4
  5106. 4
  5107. 4
  5108. 4
  5109. 4
  5110. 4
  5111. 4
  5112. 4
  5113. 4
  5114. 4
  5115. 4
  5116. 4
  5117. 4
  5118. 4
  5119. 4
  5120. 4
  5121. 4
  5122. 4
  5123. 4
  5124. 4
  5125. 4
  5126. 4
  5127. 4
  5128. 4
  5129. 4
  5130. 4
  5131. 4
  5132. 4
  5133. 4
  5134. 4
  5135. 4
  5136. 4
  5137. 4
  5138. 4
  5139. 4
  5140. 4
  5141. 4
  5142. 4
  5143. 4
  5144. 4
  5145. 4
  5146. 4
  5147. 4
  5148. 4
  5149. 4
  5150. 4
  5151. 4
  5152. 4
  5153. 4
  5154. 4
  5155. 4
  5156. 4
  5157. 4
  5158. 4
  5159. 4
  5160. 4
  5161. 4
  5162. 4
  5163. 4
  5164. 4
  5165. 4
  5166. 4
  5167. 4
  5168. 4
  5169. 4
  5170. 4
  5171. 4
  5172. 4
  5173. 4
  5174. 4
  5175. 4
  5176. 4
  5177. 4
  5178. 4
  5179. 4
  5180. 4
  5181. 4
  5182. 4
  5183. 4
  5184. 4
  5185. 4
  5186. 4
  5187. 4
  5188. 4
  5189. 4
  5190. 4
  5191. 4
  5192. 4
  5193. 4
  5194. 4
  5195. 4
  5196. 4
  5197. 4
  5198. 4
  5199. 4
  5200. 4
  5201. 4
  5202. 4
  5203. 4
  5204. 4
  5205. 4
  5206. 4
  5207. 4
  5208. 4
  5209. 4
  5210. 4
  5211. 4
  5212. 4
  5213. 4
  5214. 4
  5215. 4
  5216. 4
  5217. 4
  5218. 4
  5219. 4
  5220. 4
  5221. 4
  5222. 4
  5223. 4
  5224. 4
  5225. 4
  5226. 4
  5227. 4
  5228. 4
  5229. 4
  5230. 4
  5231. 4
  5232. 4
  5233. 4
  5234. 4
  5235. 4
  5236. 4
  5237. 4
  5238. 4
  5239. 4
  5240. 4
  5241. 4
  5242. 4
  5243. 4
  5244. 4
  5245. 4
  5246. 4
  5247. 4
  5248. 4
  5249. 4
  5250. 4
  5251. 4
  5252. 4
  5253. 4
  5254. 4
  5255. 4
  5256. 4
  5257. 4
  5258. 4
  5259. 4
  5260. 4
  5261. 4
  5262. 4
  5263. 4
  5264. 4
  5265. 4
  5266. 4
  5267. 4
  5268. 4
  5269. 4
  5270. 4
  5271. 4
  5272. 4
  5273. 4
  5274. 4
  5275. 4
  5276. 4
  5277. 4
  5278. 4
  5279. 4
  5280. 4
  5281. 4
  5282. 4
  5283. 4
  5284. 4
  5285. 4
  5286. 4
  5287. 4
  5288. 4
  5289. 4
  5290. 4
  5291. 4
  5292. 4
  5293. 4
  5294. 4
  5295. 4
  5296. 4
  5297. 4
  5298. 4
  5299. 4
  5300. 4
  5301. 4
  5302. 4
  5303. 4
  5304. 4
  5305. 4
  5306. 4
  5307. 4
  5308. 4
  5309. 4
  5310. 4
  5311. 4
  5312. 4
  5313. 4
  5314. 4
  5315. 4
  5316. 4
  5317. 4
  5318. 4
  5319. 4
  5320. 4
  5321. 4
  5322. 4
  5323. 4
  5324. 4
  5325. 4
  5326. 4
  5327. 4
  5328. 4
  5329. 4
  5330. 4
  5331. 4
  5332. 4
  5333. 4
  5334. 4
  5335. 4
  5336. 4
  5337. 4
  5338. 4
  5339. 4
  5340. 4
  5341. 4
  5342. 4
  5343. 4
  5344. 4
  5345. 4
  5346. 4
  5347. 4
  5348. 4
  5349. 4
  5350. 4
  5351. 4
  5352. 4
  5353. 4
  5354. 4
  5355. 4
  5356. 4
  5357. 4
  5358. 4
  5359. 4
  5360. 4
  5361. 4
  5362. 4
  5363. 4
  5364. 4
  5365. 4
  5366. 4
  5367. 4
  5368. 4
  5369. 4
  5370. 4
  5371. 4
  5372. 4
  5373. 4
  5374. 4
  5375. 4
  5376. 4
  5377. 4
  5378. 4
  5379. 4
  5380. 4
  5381. 4
  5382. 4
  5383. 4
  5384. 4
  5385. 4
  5386. 4
  5387. 4
  5388. 4
  5389. 4
  5390. 4
  5391. 4
  5392. 4
  5393. 4
  5394. 4
  5395. 4
  5396. 4
  5397. 4
  5398. 4
  5399. 4
  5400. 4
  5401. 4
  5402. 4
  5403. 4
  5404. 4
  5405. 4
  5406. 4
  5407. 4
  5408. 4
  5409. 4
  5410. 4
  5411. 4
  5412. 4
  5413. 4
  5414. 4
  5415. 4
  5416. 4
  5417. 4
  5418. 4
  5419. 4
  5420. 4
  5421. 4
  5422. 4
  5423. 4
  5424. 4
  5425. 4
  5426. 4
  5427. 4
  5428. 4
  5429. 4
  5430. 4
  5431. 4
  5432. 4
  5433. 4
  5434. 4
  5435. 4
  5436. 4
  5437. 4
  5438. 4
  5439. 4
  5440. 4
  5441. 4
  5442. 4
  5443. 4
  5444. 4
  5445. 4
  5446. 4
  5447. 4
  5448. 4
  5449. 4
  5450. 4
  5451. 4
  5452. 4
  5453. 4
  5454. 4
  5455. 4
  5456. 4
  5457. 4
  5458. 4
  5459. 4
  5460. 4
  5461. 4
  5462. 4
  5463. 4
  5464. 4
  5465. 4
  5466. 4
  5467. 4
  5468. 4
  5469. 4
  5470. 4
  5471. 4
  5472. 4
  5473. 4
  5474. 4
  5475. 4
  5476. 4
  5477. 4
  5478. 4
  5479. 4
  5480. 4
  5481. 4
  5482. 4
  5483. 4
  5484. “You know that most cases of FGM are consensual, right? Many people are raised in environments where this practice is normalised, so they don’t see any issue with it. They consent to it.” (Jegamespeed5399, aka ‘JayBits’)🤦‍♂️ Don’t be silly, son. Do you honestly think 12 year old girls in their right minds are going to willingly consent to having their genitals lopped off? That admission alone demonstrates where you are at. 🤦‍♂️Can you not think for yourself, for once, dude? I suggest to you, aged 12, that we chop off your cock for no reason. Do you consent to this? 🤦‍♂️ “Listen, hun, after school today me and your mother are going to take you to have a completely unnecessary medical procedure involving having your clitoris hacked off thereby leading to your being unable to have sexual pleasure ever and leading to the following possible complications:” •severe pain •excessive bleeding (haemorrhage) •genital tissue swelling •fever •infections e.g., tetanus •urinary problems •wound healing problems •injury to surrounding genital tissue •shock •vaginal problems (discharge, itching, bacterial vaginosis and other infections) menstrual problems (painful menstruations, difficulty in passing menstrual blood, etc.) •scar tissue and keloid •sexual problems (pain during intercourse, decreased satisfaction) •increased risk of childbirth complications (difficult delivery, excessive bleeding, caesarean section, need to resuscitate the baby, etc.) and newborn deaths •need for later surgeries: for example, the sealing or narrowing of the vaginal opening (type 3) may lead to the practice of cutting open the sealed vagina later to allow for sexual intercourse and childbirth (deinfibulation). Sometimes genital tissue is stitched again several times, including after childbirth, hence the woman goes through repeated opening and closing procedures, further increasing both immediate and long-term risks •psychological problems (depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, low self-esteem, etc.) •death “Now, darling, would you like to consent to this completely unnecessary procedure?” 🤦‍♂️
    4
  5485. 4
  5486. 4
  5487. 4
  5488. 4
  5489. 4
  5490. 4
  5491. 4
  5492. 4
  5493. 4
  5494. 4
  5495. 4
  5496. 4
  5497. 4
  5498. 4
  5499. 4
  5500. The Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Act (2023) prescribes up to twenty years in prison for ‘promotion of homosexuality’, life imprisonment for ‘homosexual acts’, and the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’. 1. How, exactly, can you ‘promote’ homosexuality? This isn’t about trying to persuade people to become gay, as if you are trying to persuade people to vote for you, or persuade people to buy a new whizz-bang, fancy-pants vibrator (ijumpjudy has just put in her order - extra batteries included 😉); that’s impossible. It’s not like you can ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. So, primitively prescribing 20 years imprisonment for something you either are or aren’t no matter how much ‘promoting’ is done is bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ 2. There are no such things as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’. If this term refers to anal/oral sex, then, spoiler alert: millions of heterosexuals engage in these acts, too, so to describe them as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’ is stupid and renders the description invalid. Even if we accept that giving/receiving a BJ or having anal sex is a ‘homosexual act’, you’re really going to imprison someone for life for this? 🤦‍♂️ 3. ‘Aggravated homosexuality’ has the death penalty as its punishment and is described as an offence including ‘serial offenders, same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality.’ Ok, let’s break this down: •‘serial offenders’ - presumably this means people who just have consenting sex on many occasions. Death? Don’t be silly. 🤦‍♂️ •‘same-sex rape’ - as with heterosexual rape, this should obviously be criminalised, but I wouldn’t support death for it. •‘sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation’ - in the case of a position of authority, if the other person consents to the sex, I see no issue with it. If intimidation is involved and no consent given, then this should be criminalised. •‘sex with persons older than 75’ - lol. I see absolutely no reason to criminalise someone for having sex with anyone who is above the age of consent. If that person is 75, 85 or 105, and they consent to the sex, then to institute the death penalty for this is quite nonsensical. 🤦‍♂️ •‘sex with the disabled and mentally ill’ - lol. If a disabled gay man or woman wants to have sex, where’s the fucking issue? 🤷‍♂️ Death for this? Yer having a fucking larff, aincha? 🤦‍♂️ Obviously, the mentally ill could be compromised when it comes to consent, so this needs sensitivity. •‘homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality’ - so, if someone has been convicted just once for, say, giving a BJ (which isn’t actually a ‘homosexual act’, as we’ve established there is no such thing) to his partner, and he’s caught doing it again, you kill him? Really? 🤦‍♂️ When you look closely at the Bill, it becomes increasingly ridiculous and barely believable that in 2024 we are criminalising people for simply having consensual adult sex. 🤦‍♂️
    4
  5501. 4
  5502. 4
  5503. 4
  5504. 4
  5505. 4
  5506. 4
  5507. 4
  5508. 4
  5509. 4
  5510. 4
  5511. 4
  5512. 4
  5513. 4
  5514. 4
  5515. 4
  5516. 4
  5517. 4
  5518. 4
  5519. The Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Act (2023) prescribes up to twenty years in prison for ‘promotion of homosexuality’, life imprisonment for ‘homosexual acts’, and the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’. 1. How, exactly, can you ‘promote’ homosexuality? This isn’t about trying to persuade people to become gay, as if you are trying to persuade people to vote for you, or persuade people to buy a new whizz-bang, fancy-pants vibrator (ijumpjudy has just put in her order - extra batteries included 😉); that’s impossible. It’s not like you can ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. So, primitively prescribing 20 years imprisonment for something you either are or aren’t no matter how much ‘promoting’ is done is bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ 2. There are no such things as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’. If this term refers to anal/oral sex, then, spoiler alert: millions of heterosexuals engage in these acts, too, so to describe them as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’ makes zero sense. Even if we accept that giving/receiving a BJ or having anal sex is a ‘homosexual act’, you’re really going to imprison someone for life for this? 🤦‍♂️ 3. ‘Aggravated homosexuality’ has the death penalty as its punishment and is described as an offence including ‘serial offenders, same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality.’ Ok, let’s break this down: •‘serial offenders’ - presumably this means people who just have consenting sex on many occasions. Death for this? 🤦‍♂️ •‘same-sex rape’ - as with heterosexual rape, this should obviously be criminalised, but I wouldn’t support death for it. •‘sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation’ - in the case of a position of authority, if the other person consents to the sex, I see no issue with it. If intimidation is involved and no consent given, then this should be criminalised. •‘sex with persons older than 75’ - lol. I see absolutely no reason to criminalise someone for having sex with anyone who is above the age of consent. If that person is 75, 85 or 105, and they consent to the sex, then to institute the death penalty for this is hilariously irrational. 🤦‍♂️ •‘sex with the disabled and mentally ill’ - lol. If a disabled gay man or woman wants to have sex, where’s the fucking issue? 🤷‍♂️ Death for this? Yer having a fucking larff, aincha? 🤦‍♂️ Obviously, the mentally ill could be compromised when it comes to consent, so this needs sensitivity. •‘homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality’ - so, if someone has been convicted just once for, say, giving a BJ (which isn’t actually a ‘homosexual act’, as we’ve established there is no such thing) to his partner, and he’s caught doing it again, you kill him? Really? 🤦‍♂️ When you look closely at the Bill, it becomes increasingly ridiculous and barely believable that in 2024 we are criminalising people for simply having consensual adult sex. 🤦‍♂️
    4
  5520. 4
  5521. 4
  5522. 4
  5523. 4
  5524. 4
  5525. 4
  5526. 4
  5527. 4
  5528. 4
  5529. 4
  5530. 4
  5531. 4
  5532. 4
  5533. 4
  5534. 4
  5535. 4
  5536. 4
  5537. 4
  5538. 4
  5539. 4
  5540. 4
  5541. It’s a process. It’s a process whereby gay men and women simply gain the right to have consensual adult sex free of fear of criminalisation involving fines, imprisonment or worse, wherever they are on the planet. The following is a timeline list of when and where homosexuality was decriminalised. This list is interesting as it gives the lie, somewhat, to the idea that decriminalising homosexuality is a wholly (or even a mainly) ‘Western thing’, so apparently feared by lube-head here. To pick some examples at random to demonstrate this: Turkey decriminalised in 1858; Japan in 1882; Taiwan in 1912; Thailand in 1956… while it was as late as 1967 in England/Wales and, remarkably, even later in the country of my birth, Scotland, in 1981. Equally remarkably, it was as late as 1993 before it was decriminalised in Washington DC, another 10 years after this before all the states had decriminalised. Added to this is the notable fact that in the list where homosexuality has never been illegal, almost every single country, without exception, is non-Western. •Never been illegal Aruba, Netherlands Benin Burkina Faso Cambodia Central African Republic Cocos (Keeling) Islands Republic of the Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo Christmas Island, Australia Curaçao Curaçao, Netherlands Djibouti Equatorial Guinea French Polynesia, France Indonesia Ivory Coast Laos Madagascar Mali Mayotte, France Federated States of Micronesia New Caledonia, France Niger North Korea Rwanda Sint Maarten, Netherlands South Korea Philippines Vietnam Wallis and Futuna, France •18th Century 1791: Andorra France Kingdom of France (includes Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique, Réunion, San Barthélemy, Saint Martin, and Saint Pierre and Miquelon) Haiti Saint-Domingue (Haiti) 1793: Monaco 1794: Luxembourg 1795: Belgium 1798: Canton of Geneva, Switzerland Ticino, Switzerland Vaud, Switzerland Valais, Switzerland •19th Century 1811: Netherlands 1822: Dominican Republic El Salvador 1830: Brazil 1832: Bolivia 1853: Argentina 1858: Turkey 1864: San Marino 1869: Suriname 1871: Guatemala Mexico 1882: Japan 1890: Italy Vatican City 1899: Honduras •20th Century 1912: Taiwan 1924: Peru 1933: Denmark (includes Greenland and Faroe Islands) 1932: Poland 1934: Uruguay 1940: Iceland 1942: Switzerland 1944: Sweden 1951: Greece Jordan Palestine 1956: Thailand 1961: Hungary 1962: Czechoslovakia Illinois, United States 1967: England and Wales, United Kingdom 1968: Bulgaria East Germany 1969: Canada West Germany 1971: Austria Connecticut, United States Costa Rica Finland 1972: Colorado, United States Oregon, United States Norway 1973: Delaware, United States Hawaii, United States Malta North Dakota, United States 1974: Massachusetts, United States Ohio, United States 1975: East Timor New Hampshire, United States New Mexico, United States South Australia 1976: Australian Capital Territory Bahrain California, United States Indiana, United States Maine, United States Washington (state), United States West Virginia, United States 1977: Croatia Montenegro Slovenia South Dakota, United States Vermont, United States Wyoming, United States 1978: Guam, United States Iowa, United States Nebraska, United States New Jersey, United States 1979: Cuba Spain 1980: American, United States New York, United States Pennsylvania, United States 1981: Colombia Scotland, United Kingdom Victoria, Australia 1982: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom 1983: Guernsey, United Kingdom Northern Mariana Islands Northern Territory, Australia Portugal Wisconsin, United States 1984: New South Wales, Australia 1985: Virgin Islands, United States 1986: New Zealand 1988: Israel 1989: Falkland Islands, United Kingdom Liechtenstein 1990: Jersey, United Kingdom Paraguay Western Australia 1991: Bahamas Abkhazia Hong Kong Queensland, Australia South Ossetia Ukraine 1992: Estonia Isle of Man, United Kingdom Kentucky, United States Latvia 1993: Washington, D.C. District of Columbia, United States Gibraltar, United Kingdom Guinea-Bissau Republic of Ireland Lithuania Mongolia Nevada Nevada, United States Norfolk Island, Australia Russia 1994: Kosovo Belarus Bermuda Bermuda, United Kingdom Serbia 1995: Albania Moldova 1996: Bosnia and Herzegovina Portuguese Macau North Macedonia Romania Tennessee, United States 1997: China Ecuador Montana, United States Tasmania, Australia Venezuela 1998: Cyprus Cyprus Georgia, United States Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina Rhode Island, United States South Africa Tajikistan 1999: Chile Maryland, United States 2000: Akrotiri and Dhekelia, United Kingdom Azerbaijan Georgia (country) •21st Century 2001: Anguilla, United Kingdom Arizona, United States Bosnia and Herzegovina British Virgin Islands Cayman Islands, United Kingdom Minnesota, United States Montserrat, United Kingdom Saint Helena Pitcairn Islands, United Kingdom Turks and Caicos Islands, United Kingdom 2002: Arkansas, United States Transnistria 2003: Armenia Tokelau, New Zealand United States (nationwide) 2004: Cape Verde 2005: Marshall Islands 2007: Nepal Vanuatu 2008: Nicaragua Panama 2010: Fiji 2012: Lesotho São Tomé and Príncipe 2014: Northern Cyprus Palau 2015: Mozambique 2016: Belize Nauru Seychelles 2018: India Trinidad and Tobago 2019: Botswana 2020: Gabon 2021: Angola Bhutan 2022: Antigua and Barbuda Barbados Singapore Saint Kitts and Nevis 2023: Cook Islands, New Zealand Mauritius 2024: Dominica Namibia
    4
  5542. 4
  5543. 4
  5544. 4
  5545. 4
  5546. 4
  5547. 4
  5548. 4
  5549. 4
  5550. 4
  5551. 4
  5552. The Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Act (2023) prescribes up to twenty years in prison for ‘promotion of homosexuality’, life imprisonment for ‘homosexual acts’, and the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’. 1. How, exactly, can you ‘promote’ homosexuality? This isn’t about trying to persuade people to become gay, as if you are trying to persuade people to vote for you, or persuade people to buy a new whizz-bang, fancy-pants vibrator (ijumpjudy has just put in her order - extra batteries included 😉); that’s impossible. It’s not like you can ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. So, primitively prescribing 20 years imprisonment for something you either are or aren’t no matter how much ‘promoting’ is done is bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ 2. There are no such things as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’. If this term refers to anal/oral sex, then, spoiler alert: millions of heterosexuals engage in these acts, too, so to describe them as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’ is stupid and renders the description invalid. Even if we accept that giving/receiving a BJ or having anal sex is a ‘homosexual act’, you’re really going to imprison someone for life for this? 🤦‍♂️ 3. ‘Aggravated homosexuality’ has the death penalty as its punishment and is described as an offence including ‘serial offenders, same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality.’ Ok, let’s break this down: •‘serial offenders’ - presumably this means people who just have consenting sex on many occasions. Death? Don’t be silly. 🤦‍♂️ •‘same-sex rape’ - as with heterosexual rape, this should obviously be criminalised, but I wouldn’t support death for it. •‘sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation’ - in the case of a position of authority, if the other person consents to the sex, I see no issue with it. If intimidation is involved and no consent given, then this should be criminalised. •‘sex with persons older than 75’ - lol. I see absolutely no reason to criminalise someone for having sex with anyone who is above the age of consent. If that person is 75, 85 or 105, and they consent to the sex, then to institute the death penalty for this is quite nonsensical. 🤦‍♂️ •‘sex with the disabled and mentally ill’ - lol. If a disabled gay man or woman wants to have sex, where’s the fucking issue? 🤷‍♂️ Death for this? Yer having a fucking larff, aincha? 🤦‍♂️ Obviously, the mentally ill could be compromised when it comes to consent, so this needs sensitivity. •‘homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality’ - so, if someone has been convicted just once for, say, giving a BJ (which isn’t actually a ‘homosexual act’, as we’ve established there is no such thing) to his partner, and he’s caught doing it again, you kill him? Really? 🤦‍♂️ When you look closely at the Bill, it becomes increasingly ridiculous and barely believable that in 2024 we are criminalising people for simply having consensual adult sex. 🤦‍♂️
    4
  5553. 4
  5554. 4
  5555. 4
  5556. 4
  5557. 4
  5558. 4
  5559. 4
  5560. 4
  5561. 4
  5562.  @spunkywarrior777  Thanks for a sensible, well-thought out reply. 👍 I’ve thought quite a bit about this topic over the years, as although I’m not homosexual, I have gay close family members who have experienced quite dreadful discrimination. For what it’s worth, here’s my distillation of the subject as to why some people hate homosexuality: Well, religion is clearly the no.1 reason as, in my experience, when questioned the vast majority (90+%) of homosexuality-haters I encounter are holy rollers who believe in this or that unverified and unverifiable invisible sky daddy. In the case of the Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) with their respective books written by men (anecdotally, I find men in my orbit far more likely to be homophobic than women and, tellingly, these same men are often far more forgiving of lesbianism than they are of male-on-male homosexuality), the literalist faithful are required to believe that homosexual sex is sinful and forbidden and by the letter of the holy law actually punishable by death! ( If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. ~ Leviticus 20:13). No.2 is more than likely the classic closeted gay who just can’t accept their feelings and so actively pushes them away, for it is a truth universally acknowledged that those who express irrational homophobic sentiments are quite often repressed homosexuals themselves. Homosexual urges, when repressed out of shame or fear, can (and often are) expressed as homophobia. Freud famously called this process a “reaction formation” - the angry battle against the outward symbol of feelings that are inwardly being stifled. No.3 is the simple lack of basic education. When you grow up in a culture where the most important text is some primitive book written by fallible men 1000s of years ago, you know you’re going to bump up against some stupid, risible opinions which cannot be logically maintained without the appeal to a putatively omnipotent, omniscient ‘God’. In the same book of the Old Testament which institutes death for homosexual acts it also says: Ye shall keep my statutes … neither shall a garment mingled of linen and woollen come upon you. ~ Leviticus 19:19 As I said: stupid and risible.
    4
  5563. 4
  5564. 4
  5565. 4
  5566. 4
  5567. 4
  5568. 4
  5569. It’s a process. It’s a process whereby gay men and women simply gain the right to have consensual adult sex free from fear of criminalisation involving fines, imprisonment or worse, wherever they are on the planet. The following is a timeline list of when and where homosexuality was decriminalised. This list is interesting as it gives the lie, somewhat, to the idea that decriminalising homosexuality is a wholly (or even a mainly) ‘Western thing’, so apparently feared by lube-head here. To pick some examples at random to demonstrate this: Turkey decriminalised in 1858; Japan in 1882; Taiwan in 1912; Thailand in 1956… while it was as late as 1967 in England/Wales and, remarkably, even later in the country of my birth, Scotland, in 1981. Equally remarkably, it was as late as 1993 before it was decriminalised in Washington DC, another 10 years after this before all the states had decriminalised. Added to this is the notable fact that in the list where homosexuality has never been illegal, almost every single country, without exception, is non-Western. •Never been illegal Aruba, Netherlands Benin Burkina Faso Cambodia Central African Republic Cocos (Keeling) Islands Republic of the Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo Christmas Island, Australia Curaçao Curaçao, Netherlands Djibouti Equatorial Guinea French Polynesia, France Indonesia Ivory Coast Laos Madagascar Mali Mayotte, France Federated States of Micronesia New Caledonia, France Niger North Korea Rwanda Sint Maarten, Netherlands South Korea Philippines Vietnam Wallis and Futuna, France •18th Century 1791: Andorra France Kingdom of France (includes Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique, Réunion, San Barthélemy, Saint Martin, and Saint Pierre and Miquelon) Haiti Saint-Domingue (Haiti) 1793: Monaco 1794: Luxembourg 1795: Belgium 1798: Canton of Geneva, Switzerland Ticino, Switzerland Vaud, Switzerland Valais, Switzerland •19th Century 1811: Netherlands 1822: Dominican Republic El Salvador 1830: Brazil 1832: Bolivia 1853: Argentina 1858: Turkey 1864: San Marino 1869: Suriname 1871: Guatemala Mexico 1882: Japan 1890: Italy Vatican City 1899: Honduras •20th Century 1912: Taiwan 1924: Peru 1933: Denmark (includes Greenland and Faroe Islands) 1932: Poland 1934: Uruguay 1940: Iceland 1942: Switzerland 1944: Sweden 1951: Greece Jordan Palestine 1956: Thailand 1961: Hungary 1962: Czechoslovakia Illinois, United States 1967: England and Wales, United Kingdom 1968: Bulgaria East Germany 1969: Canada West Germany 1971: Austria Connecticut, United States Costa Rica Finland 1972: Colorado, United States Oregon, United States Norway 1973: Delaware, United States Hawaii, United States Malta North Dakota, United States 1974: Massachusetts, United States Ohio, United States 1975: East Timor New Hampshire, United States New Mexico, United States South Australia 1976: Australian Capital Territory Bahrain California, United States Indiana, United States Maine, United States Washington (state), United States West Virginia, United States 1977: Croatia Montenegro Slovenia South Dakota, United States Vermont, United States Wyoming, United States 1978: Guam, United States Iowa, United States Nebraska, United States New Jersey, United States 1979: Cuba Spain 1980: American, United States New York, United States Pennsylvania, United States 1981: Colombia Scotland, United Kingdom Victoria, Australia 1982: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom 1983: Guernsey, United Kingdom Northern Mariana Islands Northern Territory, Australia Portugal Wisconsin, United States 1984: New South Wales, Australia 1985: Virgin Islands, United States 1986: New Zealand 1988: Israel 1989: Falkland Islands, United Kingdom Liechtenstein 1990: Jersey, United Kingdom Paraguay Western Australia 1991: Bahamas Abkhazia Hong Kong Queensland, Australia South Ossetia Ukraine 1992: Estonia Isle of Man, United Kingdom Kentucky, United States Latvia 1993: Washington, D.C. District of Columbia, United States Gibraltar, United Kingdom Guinea-Bissau Republic of Ireland Lithuania Mongolia Nevada Nevada, United States Norfolk Island, Australia Russia 1994: Kosovo Belarus Bermuda Bermuda, United Kingdom Serbia 1995: Albania Moldova 1996: Bosnia and Herzegovina Portuguese Macau North Macedonia Romania Tennessee, United States 1997: China Ecuador Montana, United States Tasmania, Australia Venezuela 1998: Cyprus Cyprus Georgia, United States Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina Rhode Island, United States South Africa Tajikistan 1999: Chile Maryland, United States 2000: Akrotiri and Dhekelia, United Kingdom Azerbaijan Georgia (country) •21st Century 2001: Anguilla, United Kingdom Arizona, United States Bosnia and Herzegovina British Virgin Islands Cayman Islands, United Kingdom Minnesota, United States Montserrat, United Kingdom Saint Helena Pitcairn Islands, United Kingdom Turks and Caicos Islands, United Kingdom 2002: Arkansas, United States Transnistria 2003: Armenia Tokelau, New Zealand United States (nationwide) 2004: Cape Verde 2005: Marshall Islands 2007: Nepal Vanuatu 2008: Nicaragua Panama 2010: Fiji 2012: Lesotho São Tomé and Príncipe 2014: Northern Cyprus Palau 2015: Mozambique 2016: Belize Nauru Seychelles 2018: India Trinidad and Tobago 2019: Botswana 2020: Gabon 2021: Angola Bhutan 2022: Antigua and Barbuda Barbados Singapore Saint Kitts and Nevis 2023: Cook Islands, New Zealand Mauritius 2024: Dominica Namibia
    4
  5570. 4
  5571. 4
  5572. 4
  5573. 4
  5574. 4
  5575. 4
  5576. 4
  5577. 4
  5578. 4
  5579. 4
  5580. 4
  5581. There is a direct correlation between countries which belong to the Commonwealth, and therefore have previously been under British rule, and countries that still have homophobic biphobic and/or transphobic legislature in their constitutions. 25% of the world’s population (2.4 billion people) currently live in a country belonging to the Commonwealth, however they make up a disproportionately large 50 per cent of countries that still criminalise homosexuality. There are currently 64 countries (out of 195) in the world that criminalise homosexuality. Of these 64, almost half (29) belong to the Commonwealth. Africa Algeria Cameroon ✅ Chad Comoros Egypt Eritrea Eswatini (Swaziland) ✅ Ethiopia Gambia ✅ Ghana ✅ Guinea Kenya ✅ Liberia Libya Malawi ✅ Mauritania Morocco Nigeria ✅ Senegal Sierra Leone ✅ Somalia South Sudan Sudan Tanzania Togo ✅ Tunisia Uganda ✅ Zambia ✅ Zimbabwe ✅ Asia, including the Middle East Afghanistan Bangladesh ✅ Brunei ✅ Indonesia Iran Iraq Kuwait Lebanon Malaysia ✅ Maldives ✅ Myanmar Oman Pakistan ✅ Palestine Qatar Saudi Arabia Sri Lanka ✅ Syria Turkmenistan United Arab Emirates Uzbekistan Yemen Americas Grenada ✅ Guyana ✅ Jamaica ✅ St Lucia ✅ St Vincent & the Grenadines ✅ Oceania Kiribati ✅ Niue Papua New Guinea ✅ Samoa ✅ Solomon Islands ✅ Tonga ✅ Tuvalu ✅ ✅ Commonwealth member The vast majority of the remaining 64 are majority Islamic. What does this prove? Well, organised religion plays a vital role in the criminalisation of homosexuality. However, the key takeaway for the purposes of this video, is that in Uganda, prior to the widespread introduction of Christianity (Uganda is currently 84% Christian/14% Muslim) homosexuality was largely tolerated and not legislated for within the various tribal denominations. At worst, in most cases, it was merely ignored. Yet here we have Museveni telling the ‘evil West’ to butt-out, when the criminalisation of homosexuality was brought in directly on the back of a Bible (…and a Quran!) by a bunch of Westerners! Hypocrisy? 🤦‍♂️
    4
  5582. 4
  5583. “You know that most cases of FGM are consensual, right? Many people are raised in environments where this practice is normalised, so they don’t see any issue with it. They consent to it.” (Jegamespeed5399, aka ‘JayBits’)🤦‍♂️ Don’t be silly, son. Do you honestly think 12 year old girls in their right minds are going to willingly consent to having their genitals lopped off? That admission alone demonstrates where you are at. 🤦‍♂️Can you not think for yourself, for once, dude? I suggest to you, aged 12, that we chop off your cock for no reason. Do you consent to this? 🤦‍♂️ “Listen, hun, after school today me and your mother are going to take you to have a completely unnecessary medical procedure involving having your clitoris hacked off thereby leading to your being unable to have sexual pleasure ever and leading to the following possible complications:” •severe pain •excessive bleeding (haemorrhage) •genital tissue swelling •fever •infections e.g., tetanus •urinary problems •wound healing problems •injury to surrounding genital tissue •shock •vaginal problems (discharge, itching, bacterial vaginosis and other infections) menstrual problems (painful menstruations, difficulty in passing menstrual blood, etc.) •scar tissue and keloid •sexual problems (pain during intercourse, decreased satisfaction) •increased risk of childbirth complications (difficult delivery, excessive bleeding, caesarean section, need to resuscitate the baby, etc.) and newborn deaths •need for later surgeries: for example, the sealing or narrowing of the vaginal opening (type 3) may lead to the practice of cutting open the sealed vagina later to allow for sexual intercourse and childbirth (deinfibulation). Sometimes genital tissue is stitched again several times, including after childbirth, hence the woman goes through repeated opening and closing procedures, further increasing both immediate and long-term risks •psychological problems (depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, low self-esteem, etc.) •death “Now, darling, would you like to consent to this completely unnecessary procedure?” 🤦‍♂️
    4
  5584. 4
  5585. 4
  5586. 4
  5587. 4
  5588. It’s a process. It’s a process whereby gay men and women simply gain the right to have consensual adult sex free from fear of criminalisation involving fines, imprisonment or worse, wherever they are on the planet. The following is a timeline list of when and where homosexuality was decriminalised. This list is interesting as it gives the lie, somewhat, to the idea that decriminalising homosexuality is a wholly (or even a mainly) ‘Western thing’, so apparently feared by lube-head here. To pick some examples at random to demonstrate this: Turkey decriminalised in 1858; Japan in 1882; Taiwan in 1912; Thailand in 1956… while it was as late as 1967 in England/Wales and, remarkably, even later in the country of my birth, Scotland, in 1981. Equally remarkably, it was as late as 1993 before it was decriminalised in Washington DC, another 10 years after this before all the states had decriminalised. Added to this is the notable fact that in the list where homosexuality has never been illegal, almost every single country, without exception, is non-Western. •Never been illegal Aruba, Netherlands Benin Burkina Faso Cambodia Central African Republic Cocos (Keeling) Islands Republic of the Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo Christmas Island, Australia Curaçao Curaçao, Netherlands Djibouti Equatorial Guinea French Polynesia, France Indonesia Ivory Coast Laos Madagascar Mali Mayotte, France Federated States of Micronesia New Caledonia, France Niger North Korea Rwanda Sint Maarten, Netherlands South Korea Philippines Vietnam Wallis and Futuna, France •18th Century 1791: Andorra France Kingdom of France (includes Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique, Réunion, San Barthélemy, Saint Martin, and Saint Pierre and Miquelon) Haiti Saint-Domingue (Haiti) 1793: Monaco 1794: Luxembourg 1795: Belgium 1798: Canton of Geneva, Switzerland Ticino, Switzerland Vaud, Switzerland Valais, Switzerland •19th Century 1811: Netherlands 1822: Dominican Republic El Salvador 1830: Brazil 1832: Bolivia 1853: Argentina 1858: Turkey 1864: San Marino 1869: Suriname 1871: Guatemala Mexico 1882: Japan 1890: Italy Vatican City 1899: Honduras •20th Century 1912: Taiwan 1924: Peru 1933: Denmark (includes Greenland and Faroe Islands) 1932: Poland 1934: Uruguay 1940: Iceland 1942: Switzerland 1944: Sweden 1951: Greece Jordan Palestine 1956: Thailand 1961: Hungary 1962: Czechoslovakia Illinois, United States 1967: England and Wales, United Kingdom 1968: Bulgaria East Germany 1969: Canada West Germany 1971: Austria Connecticut, United States Costa Rica Finland 1972: Colorado, United States Oregon, United States Norway 1973: Delaware, United States Hawaii, United States Malta North Dakota, United States 1974: Massachusetts, United States Ohio, United States 1975: East Timor New Hampshire, United States New Mexico, United States South Australia 1976: Australian Capital Territory Bahrain California, United States Indiana, United States Maine, United States Washington (state), United States West Virginia, United States 1977: Croatia Montenegro Slovenia South Dakota, United States Vermont, United States Wyoming, United States 1978: Guam, United States Iowa, United States Nebraska, United States New Jersey, United States 1979: Cuba Spain 1980: American, United States New York, United States Pennsylvania, United States 1981: Colombia Scotland, United Kingdom Victoria, Australia 1982: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom 1983: Guernsey, United Kingdom Northern Mariana Islands Northern Territory, Australia Portugal Wisconsin, United States 1984: New South Wales, Australia 1985: Virgin Islands, United States 1986: New Zealand 1988: Israel 1989: Falkland Islands, United Kingdom Liechtenstein 1990: Jersey, United Kingdom Paraguay Western Australia 1991: Bahamas Abkhazia Hong Kong Queensland, Australia South Ossetia Ukraine 1992: Estonia Isle of Man, United Kingdom Kentucky, United States Latvia 1993: Washington, D.C. District of Columbia, United States Gibraltar, United Kingdom Guinea-Bissau Republic of Ireland Lithuania Mongolia Nevada Nevada, United States Norfolk Island, Australia Russia 1994: Kosovo Belarus Bermuda Bermuda, United Kingdom Serbia 1995: Albania Moldova 1996: Bosnia and Herzegovina Portuguese Macau North Macedonia Romania Tennessee, United States 1997: China Ecuador Montana, United States Tasmania, Australia Venezuela 1998: Cyprus Cyprus Georgia, United States Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina Rhode Island, United States South Africa Tajikistan 1999: Chile Maryland, United States 2000: Akrotiri and Dhekelia, United Kingdom Azerbaijan Georgia (country) •21st Century 2001: Anguilla, United Kingdom Arizona, United States Bosnia and Herzegovina British Virgin Islands Cayman Islands, United Kingdom Minnesota, United States Montserrat, United Kingdom Saint Helena Pitcairn Islands, United Kingdom Turks and Caicos Islands, United Kingdom 2002: Arkansas, United States Transnistria 2003: Armenia Tokelau, New Zealand United States (nationwide) 2004: Cape Verde 2005: Marshall Islands 2007: Nepal Vanuatu 2008: Nicaragua Panama 2010: Fiji 2012: Lesotho São Tomé and Príncipe 2014: Northern Cyprus Palau 2015: Mozambique 2016: Belize Nauru Seychelles 2018: India Trinidad and Tobago 2019: Botswana 2020: Gabon 2021: Angola Bhutan 2022: Antigua and Barbuda Barbados Singapore Saint Kitts and Nevis 2023: Cook Islands, New Zealand Mauritius 2024: Dominica Namibia
    4
  5589. 4
  5590. 4
  5591. 4
  5592. 4
  5593. 4
  5594. 4
  5595. 4
  5596. 4
  5597. 4
  5598. 4
  5599. There is a direct correlation between countries which belong to the Commonwealth, and therefore have previously been under British rule, and countries that still have homophobic biphobic and/or transphobic legislature in their constitutions. 25% of the world’s population (2.4 billion people) currently live in a country belonging to the Commonwealth, however they make up a disproportionately large 50 per cent of countries that still criminalise homosexuality. There are currently 64 countries (out of 195) in the world that criminalise homosexuality. Of these 64, almost half (29) belong to the Commonwealth. Africa Algeria Cameroon ✅ Chad Comoros Egypt Eritrea Eswatini (Swaziland) ✅ Ethiopia Gambia ✅ Ghana ✅ Guinea Kenya ✅ Liberia Libya Malawi ✅ Mauritania Morocco Nigeria ✅ Senegal Sierra Leone ✅ Somalia South Sudan Sudan Tanzania Togo ✅ Tunisia Uganda ✅ Zambia ✅ Zimbabwe ✅ Asia, including the Middle East Afghanistan Bangladesh ✅ Brunei ✅ Indonesia Iran Iraq Kuwait Lebanon Malaysia ✅ Maldives ✅ Myanmar Oman Pakistan ✅ Palestine Qatar Saudi Arabia Sri Lanka ✅ Syria Turkmenistan United Arab Emirates Uzbekistan Yemen Americas Grenada ✅ Guyana ✅ Jamaica ✅ St Lucia ✅ St Vincent & the Grenadines ✅ Oceania Kiribati ✅ Niue Papua New Guinea ✅ Samoa ✅ Solomon Islands ✅ Tonga ✅ Tuvalu ✅ ✅ Commonwealth member The vast majority of the remaining 64 are majority Islamic. What does this prove? Well, organised religion plays a vital role in the criminalisation of homosexuality. However, the key takeaway for the purposes of this video, is that in Uganda, prior to the widespread introduction of Christianity (Uganda is currently 84% Christian/14% Muslim) homosexuality was largely tolerated and not legislated for within the various tribal denominations. At worst, in most cases, it was merely ignored. Yet here we have Museveni telling the ‘evil West’ to butt-out, when the criminalisation of homosexuality was brought in directly on the back of a Bible (…and a Quran!) by a bunch of Westerners! Hypocrisy? 🤦‍♂️
    4
  5600. 4
  5601. The Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Act (2023) prescribes up to twenty years in prison for ‘promotion of homosexuality’, life imprisonment for ‘homosexual acts’, and the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’. 1. How, exactly, can you ‘promote’ homosexuality? This isn’t about trying to persuade people to become gay, as if you are trying to persuade people to vote for you, or persuade people to buy a new whizz-bang, fancy-pants vibrator (ijumpjudy has just put in her order - extra batteries included 😉); that’s impossible. It’s not like you can ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. So, primitively prescribing 20 years imprisonment for something you either are or aren’t no matter how much ‘promoting’ is done is bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ 2. There are no such things as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’. If this term refers to anal/oral sex, then, spoiler alert: millions of heterosexuals engage in these acts, too, so to describe them as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’ makes zero sense. Even if we accept that giving/receiving a BJ or having anal sex is a ‘homosexual act’, you’re really going to imprison someone for life for this? 🤦‍♂️ 3. ‘Aggravated homosexuality’ has the death penalty as its punishment and is described as an offence including ‘serial offenders, same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality.’ Ok, let’s break this down: •‘serial offenders’ - presumably this means people who just have consenting sex on many occasions. Death for this? 🤦‍♂️ •‘same-sex rape’ - as with heterosexual rape, this should obviously be criminalised, but I wouldn’t support death for it. •‘sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation’ - in the case of a position of authority, if the other person consents to the sex, I see no issue with it. If intimidation is involved and no consent given, then this should be criminalised. •‘sex with persons older than 75’ - lol. I see absolutely no reason to criminalise someone for having sex with anyone who is above the age of consent. If that person is 75, 85 or 105, and they consent to the sex, then to institute the death penalty for this is hilariously irrational. 🤦‍♂️ •‘sex with the disabled and mentally ill’ - lol. If a disabled gay man or woman wants to have sex, where’s the fucking issue? 🤷‍♂️ Death for this? Yer having a fucking larff, aincha? 🤦‍♂️ Obviously, the mentally ill could be compromised when it comes to consent, so this needs sensitivity. •‘homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality’ - so, if someone has been convicted just once for, say, giving a BJ (which isn’t actually a ‘homosexual act’, as we’ve established there is no such thing) to his partner, and he’s caught doing it again, you kill him? Really? 🤦‍♂️ When you look closely at the Bill, it becomes increasingly ridiculous and barely believable that in 2024 we are criminalising people for simply having consensual adult sex. 🤦‍♂️
    4
  5602. 4
  5603. 4
  5604. 4
  5605. 4
  5606. I believe that you cannot claim to be a human being, if you do not respect human rights. And this imposes on you an obligation to promote and protect the rights of other human beings. Nelson Mandela held the view that love is inherent and inborn. Hate, on the other hand, is taught, acquired. I think we are all born good human beings and we're all born to love – to love ourselves, to love other human beings, to love our neighbours, regardless of colour, regardless of sexual orientation, regardless of stature. Or it ought to be as simple as that. But there are people who find it easier to abuse power and authority. They pass the law simply because they can, define cultural values simply because they can. And they don't want us to have a debate about this. One of the bill's objectives was supposedly to protect the “traditional”, “moral”, “religious” values of Uganda. What you are saying is that we have [one set of] “religious” values in a country where you have predominant Christian churches, Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs and pagans. Homophobia has never been part of traditional African societies. Perhaps they had a lack of understanding, but they let them live in peace. Leading up to the first Anti-Homosexuality Bill in 2014, we knew that radical Pentecostal communities from the US were sponsoring the introduction of anti-LGBTIQ laws throughout Africa. There are still a few US pastors – I call them hate-mongers because that's all they excel in, vending hatred in Uganda. I don't understand why heterosexuals are so timid in their skin, why they think that the LGBTIQ community is the greatest threat to the survival of mankind. I believe the problem is this. Our people, including legislators, do not know the difference between homosexuality and non-consensual sex. And they mix it up with paedophilia. The Church of Uganda and the Church of England recently fell out over blessings for same-sex couples. That's where the problem started, before the Muslims jumped on the bandwagon. This has always been fuelled by Christian fundamentalism. Islam is a very conservative religion, but I don't think they had the capacity to pull this off without their Christian brothers and sisters. (Fox Odoi-Oywelowo - member of Uganda’s ruling party and President Yoweri Museveni’s legal adviser for more than 15 years)
    4
  5607. 4
  5608. 4
  5609. 4
  5610. 4
  5611. 4
  5612. 4
  5613. 4
  5614. 4
  5615. 4
  5616. 4
  5617. 4
  5618. 4
  5619. 4
  5620. 4
  5621. 4
  5622. 4
  5623. 4
  5624. 4
  5625. 4
  5626. 4
  5627. 4
  5628. 4
  5629. 4
  5630. 4
  5631. 4
  5632. 4
  5633. 4
  5634. 4
  5635. 4
  5636. 4
  5637. 4
  5638. 4
  5639. 4
  5640. 4
  5641. 4
  5642. 4
  5643. 4
  5644. 4
  5645. 4
  5646. 4
  5647. 4
  5648. 4
  5649. 4
  5650. 4
  5651. 4
  5652. 4
  5653. 4
  5654. 4
  5655. 4
  5656. 4
  5657. 4
  5658. 4
  5659. 4
  5660. 4
  5661. 4
  5662. 4
  5663. 4
  5664. 4
  5665. 4
  5666. 4
  5667. 4
  5668. 4
  5669. 4
  5670. 4
  5671. 4
  5672. 4
  5673. 4
  5674. 4
  5675. 4
  5676. 4
  5677. 4
  5678. 4
  5679. 4
  5680. 4
  5681. 4
  5682. 4
  5683. 4
  5684. 4
  5685. 4
  5686. 4
  5687. 4
  5688. 4
  5689. 4
  5690. 4
  5691. 4
  5692. 4
  5693. 4
  5694. 4
  5695. 4
  5696. 4
  5697. 4
  5698. 4
  5699. 4
  5700. 4
  5701. 4
  5702. 4
  5703. 4
  5704. 4
  5705. 4
  5706. 4
  5707. 4
  5708. 4
  5709. 4
  5710. 4
  5711. 4
  5712. 4
  5713. 4
  5714. 4
  5715. 4
  5716. 4
  5717. 4
  5718. 4
  5719. 4
  5720. 4
  5721. 4
  5722. 4
  5723. 4
  5724. 4
  5725. 4
  5726. 4
  5727. 4
  5728. 4
  5729. 4
  5730. 4
  5731. 4
  5732. 4
  5733. 4
  5734. 4
  5735. 4
  5736. 4
  5737. 4
  5738. 4
  5739. 4
  5740. 4
  5741. 4
  5742. 4
  5743. 4
  5744. 4
  5745. 4
  5746. 4
  5747. 4
  5748. 4
  5749. 4
  5750. 4
  5751. 4
  5752. 4
  5753. 4
  5754. 4
  5755. 4
  5756. 4
  5757. 4
  5758. 4
  5759. 4
  5760. 4
  5761. 4
  5762. 4
  5763. 4
  5764. 4
  5765. 4
  5766. 4
  5767. 4
  5768. 4
  5769. 4
  5770. 4
  5771. 4
  5772. 4
  5773. 4
  5774. 4
  5775. 4
  5776. 4
  5777. 4
  5778. 4
  5779. 4
  5780. 4
  5781. 4
  5782. 4
  5783. 4
  5784. 4
  5785. 4
  5786. 4
  5787. 4
  5788. 4
  5789. 4
  5790. 4
  5791. 4
  5792. 4
  5793. 4
  5794. 4
  5795. 4
  5796. 4
  5797. 4
  5798. 4
  5799. 4
  5800. 4
  5801. 4
  5802. 4
  5803. 4
  5804. 4
  5805. 4
  5806. 4
  5807. 4
  5808. 4
  5809. 4
  5810. 4
  5811. 4
  5812. 4
  5813. 4
  5814. 4
  5815. 4
  5816. 4
  5817. 4
  5818. 4
  5819. 4
  5820. 4
  5821. 4
  5822. 4
  5823. 4
  5824. 4
  5825. 4
  5826. 4
  5827. 4
  5828. 4
  5829. 4
  5830. 4
  5831. 4
  5832. 4
  5833. 4
  5834. 4
  5835. 4
  5836. 4
  5837. 4
  5838. 4
  5839. 4
  5840. 4
  5841. 4
  5842. 4
  5843. 4
  5844. 4
  5845. 4
  5846. 4
  5847. 4
  5848. 4
  5849. 4
  5850. 4
  5851. 4
  5852. 4
  5853. 4
  5854. 4
  5855. 4
  5856. 4
  5857. 4
  5858. 4
  5859. 4
  5860. 4
  5861. 4
  5862. 4
  5863. 4
  5864. 4
  5865. 4
  5866. 4
  5867. 4
  5868. 4
  5869. 4
  5870. 4
  5871. 4
  5872. 4
  5873. 4
  5874. 4
  5875. 4
  5876. 4
  5877. 4
  5878. 4
  5879. 4
  5880. 4
  5881. 4
  5882. 4
  5883. 4
  5884. 4
  5885. 4
  5886. 4
  5887. 4
  5888. 4
  5889. 4
  5890. 4
  5891. 4
  5892. 4
  5893. 4
  5894. 4
  5895. 4
  5896. 4
  5897. 4
  5898. 4
  5899. 4
  5900. 4
  5901. 4
  5902. 4
  5903. 4
  5904. 4
  5905. 4
  5906. 4
  5907. The evidence is clear: the main cause of climate change is burning fossil fuels such as oil, gas, and coal. When burnt, fossil fuels release carbon dioxide into the air, causing the planet to heat up. The climate on Earth has been changing since it formed 4.5 billion years ago. Until recently, natural factors have been the cause of these changes. Natural influences on the climate include volcanic eruptions, changes in the orbit of the Earth, and shifts in the Earth's crust (known as plate tectonics). Over the past one million years, the Earth has experienced a series of ice ages, including cooler periods (glacials) and warmer periods (interglacials). Glacial and interglacial periods cycle roughly every 100,000 years, caused by changes in Earth's orbit around the sun. For the past few thousand years, Earth has been in an interglacial period with a constant temperature. However, since the Industrial Revolution in the 1800s, the global temperature has increased at a much faster rate. By burning fossil fuels and changing how we use the land, human activity has quickly become the leading cause of changes to our climate. There’s also water vapour to consider, too. For although water vapour probably accounts for about 60% of the Earth's greenhouse warming effect, water vapour does not control the Earth's temperature. Because these gases are not condensable at atmospheric temperatures and pressures, the atmosphere can pack in much more of these gases. It seems indisputable that not only is the planet warming rather rapidly, but that much of this warming is due to manmade activity.😳
    4
  5908. 4
  5909. 4
  5910. 4
  5911. 4
  5912. 4
  5913. 4
  5914. 4
  5915. 4
  5916. 4
  5917. 4
  5918. 4
  5919. 4
  5920. 4
  5921. 4
  5922. 4
  5923. 4
  5924. 4
  5925. 4
  5926. 4
  5927. 4
  5928. 4
  5929. 4
  5930. 4
  5931. 4
  5932. 4
  5933. 4
  5934. 4
  5935. 4
  5936. 4
  5937. 4
  5938. 4
  5939. 4
  5940. 4
  5941. 4
  5942. 4
  5943. 4
  5944. 4
  5945. 4
  5946. 4
  5947. 4
  5948. 4
  5949. 4
  5950. 4
  5951. 4
  5952. 4
  5953. 4
  5954. 4
  5955. 4
  5956. 4
  5957. 4
  5958. 4
  5959. 4
  5960. 4
  5961. 4
  5962. 4
  5963. 4
  5964. 4
  5965. 4
  5966. 4
  5967. 4
  5968. 4
  5969. 4
  5970. 4
  5971. @8:03 This guy slightly contradicts himself here from what he said earlier in the episode when he was praising Brits for having a cultural openness he was attracted to; here he appears to be falling into that trap of looking at the Brits in Spain as the stereotypical blinkered, monocultural, monolingual dolts that infest the Costas. They are to be abhorred for their blithe delusion that they are somehow ‘it’ with their fish & chips, tatty tattoos & weak beer. Believe it or not, there are Brits who go to the ‘other Spain’; the Spain where life is recognisably Spanish & not some raggedy British enclave full of morons. It’s no accident that the 2 most ‘British’ places in Spain are also the 2 most physically & culturally repulsive in the whole of the country: Benidorm & Gibraltar (yes, I realise Gibraltar isn’t really in Spain, but you know what I mean). They are also the most deeply boring places for the reasons quoted above & it always astonished me that any self-respecting native Spaniard ever has anything to do with either place. For example, I’m told that there are actually Spanish people who go to Benidorm for a holiday?! Go figure. One last thing to say on all this & it’s pertinent: of all the Spaniards that come to live in the UK I’ve never met one who didn’t speak virtually perfect English & a few other languages besides. This cannot be said for the Bulldog British cretins on the Costas. They never learned Spanish & have no intention of doing so. And why? Well, they’re often thick, which doesn’t help, but also quite simply they don’t have to as they know they can get by with their poorly-phrased English which they never learned properly in the first place.
    4
  5972. 4
  5973. 4
  5974. 4
  5975. 4
  5976. 4
  5977. 4
  5978. 4
  5979. 4
  5980. 4
  5981. 4
  5982. 4
  5983. 4
  5984. 4
  5985. 4
  5986.  @delawarecop  US invades China 1945-46 - OK US invades Korea 1950-53 - OK US invades China (again) 1950-53 - OK US invades Guatemala 1954 - OK US invades Indonesia 1958 - OK US invades Cuba 1959-60 - OK US invades Guatemala 1960 - OK US invades Belgian Congo 1964 - OK US invades Guatemala (again) 1964 - OK US invades Dominican Republic 1965-66 - OK US invades Peru 1965 - OK US invades Laos 1964-73 - OK US invades Vietnam 1961-73 - OK US invades Cambodia 1969-70 - OK US invades Guatemala (yet again) 1967-69 - OK US invades Lebanon 1982-84 - OK US invades Grenada 1983-84 - OK US invades Libya 1986 - OK US invades El Salvador 1981-92 - OK US invades Nicaragua 1981-90 - OK US invades Iran 1987-88 - OK US invades Libya (again) 1989 - OK US invades Panama 1989-90 - OK US invades Iraq 1991 - OK US invades Kuwait 1991 - OK US invades Somalia 1992-94 - OK US invades Bosnia 1995 - OK US invades Iran 1998 - OK US invades Sudan 1998 - OK US invades Afghanistan 1998 - OK US invades Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999 - OK US invades Afghanistan 2001 - OK US invades Iraq (again) 2003 - OK US invades Libya (yet again) 2011 - OK US invades Iraq (and yet again) and Syria 2014 – OK US invades Somalia 2011 – OK US invades Iran 2020 – OK Russia invades Ukraine 2022 - not OK America, and her partners, have a record Putin’s Russia can only dream of when it comes to invading other sovereign nations. The above list doesn’t include the dozens of times America has overturned democratically-elected governments and installed their proxy regimes to suit American self-interests. Including the US/CIA backed coup in Ukraine itself in 2014. It’s a fact that America has meddled in the affairs of virtually every sovereign nation on Earth at some point; some 180 countries. America, quite simply, has more innocent blood on her hands than any other nation on this planet.
    4
  5987. 4
  5988. 4
  5989. 4
  5990. 4
  5991. 4
  5992. 4
  5993. 4
  5994. 4
  5995. 4
  5996. 4
  5997. 4
  5998. 4
  5999. 4
  6000. 4
  6001. 4
  6002. 4
  6003. 4
  6004. 4
  6005. 4
  6006. 4
  6007. 4
  6008. 4
  6009. 4
  6010. 4
  6011. 4
  6012. 4
  6013. 4
  6014. 4
  6015. 4
  6016. 4
  6017. 4
  6018. 4
  6019. 4
  6020. 4
  6021. 4
  6022. 4
  6023. 4
  6024. 4
  6025. 4
  6026. 4
  6027. 4
  6028. 4
  6029. 4
  6030. 4
  6031. 4
  6032. 4
  6033. 4
  6034. 4
  6035. 4
  6036. 4
  6037. 4
  6038. 4
  6039. 4
  6040. 4
  6041. 4
  6042. 4
  6043. 4
  6044. 4
  6045. 4
  6046. 4
  6047. 4
  6048. 4
  6049. 4
  6050. 4
  6051. 4
  6052. 4
  6053. 4
  6054. 4
  6055. 4
  6056. 4
  6057. 4
  6058. 4
  6059. 4
  6060. 4
  6061. 4
  6062. 4
  6063. 4
  6064. 4
  6065. 4
  6066. 4
  6067. 4
  6068. 4
  6069. 4
  6070. 4
  6071. 4
  6072. 4
  6073. 4
  6074. 4
  6075. 4
  6076. 4
  6077. 4
  6078. 4
  6079. 4
  6080. 4
  6081. 4
  6082. 4
  6083. 4
  6084. 4
  6085. 4
  6086. 4
  6087. 4
  6088. 4
  6089. 4
  6090. 4
  6091. 4
  6092. 4
  6093. 4
  6094. 4
  6095. 4
  6096. 4
  6097. 4
  6098. 4
  6099. 4
  6100. 4
  6101. 4
  6102. 4
  6103. 4
  6104. 4
  6105. 4
  6106. 4
  6107. 4
  6108. 4
  6109. 4
  6110. 4
  6111. 4
  6112. 4
  6113. 4
  6114. 4
  6115. 4
  6116. 4
  6117. 4
  6118. 4
  6119. 4
  6120. 4
  6121. 4
  6122. 4
  6123. 4
  6124. 4
  6125. 4
  6126. 4
  6127. 4
  6128. 4
  6129. 4
  6130. 4
  6131. 4
  6132. 4
  6133. 4
  6134. 4
  6135. 4
  6136. 4
  6137. 4
  6138. 4
  6139. 4
  6140. 4
  6141. 4
  6142. 4
  6143. 4
  6144. 4
  6145. 4
  6146. 4
  6147. 4
  6148. 4
  6149. 4
  6150. 4
  6151. 4
  6152. 4
  6153. 4
  6154. 4
  6155. 4
  6156. 4
  6157. 4
  6158. 4
  6159. 4
  6160. 4
  6161. 4
  6162. 4
  6163. 4
  6164. 4
  6165. 4
  6166. 4
  6167. 4
  6168. 4
  6169. 4
  6170. 4
  6171. 4
  6172. 4
  6173. 4
  6174. 4
  6175. 4
  6176. 4
  6177. 4
  6178. 4
  6179. 4
  6180. 4
  6181. 4
  6182. 4
  6183. 4
  6184. 4
  6185. The greatest problem humanity faces, and has always faced, is one of perspective. We have narrowed our vision such that we are unable to see the universal wood for the exclusive trees. We have hitched our star to this or that family, clan, tribe, nationalism, religion, such that we have become deluded, unable to serenely see what actually is. We are cosmic dust on a grain of sand, one of trillions of grains of sand, whirling around a nuclear reactor, one of trillions of nuclear reactors and we are willing to abase ourselves to murdering one another for an accident of birth, or an imagined daddy in the sky? Has it come to this? There are alien civilisations who use this Earth as a cosmic pit stop on their intergalactic travels and they look at us and weep. They have perspective. They can literally see the Earth in toto. They cannot see the pettifogging, sanguinary squabbles over this or that imaginary line drawn on a map. They cannot see the ignorant ranters championing their imagined God, ranked against the ignorant ranters championing their imaginary God. The solution to all this nonsense is very simple. Expand your terms of self-definition. Refuse to accept a random, arbitrary accident of birth as a salient marker of your identity. Refuse to accept unthought-out shibboleths handed down to you to shore up your fear of death. Refuse to be proud, unless your pride is grounded in self-motivated, self-guided achievement, and not some random, bizarre, nonsensical ‘pride’ based on the fact your mother happened to plop you out here, and not there. None of this would matter a fig, but for a key point: we now, at this critical juncture in our cosmic journey, face the very real and present danger of incinerating this planet and everything on it. Really. We are better than that.😳
    4
  6186. 4
  6187. 4
  6188. 4
  6189. 4
  6190. 4
  6191. 4
  6192. 4
  6193. 4
  6194. 4
  6195. 4
  6196. 4
  6197. 4
  6198. 4
  6199. 4
  6200. 4
  6201. 4
  6202. 4
  6203. 4
  6204. 4
  6205. 4
  6206. 4
  6207. 4
  6208. 4
  6209. 4
  6210. 4
  6211. 4
  6212. 4
  6213. 4
  6214. 4
  6215. 4
  6216. 4
  6217. 4
  6218. 4
  6219. 4
  6220. 4
  6221. 4
  6222. 4
  6223. 4
  6224. 4
  6225. 4
  6226. 4
  6227. 4
  6228. 4
  6229. 4
  6230. 4
  6231. 4
  6232. 4
  6233. 4
  6234. 4
  6235. 4
  6236. 4
  6237. 4
  6238. 4
  6239. 4
  6240. 4
  6241. 4
  6242. 4
  6243. 4
  6244. 4
  6245. 4
  6246. 4
  6247. 4
  6248. 4
  6249. 4
  6250. 4
  6251. 4
  6252. 4
  6253. 4
  6254. 4
  6255. 4
  6256. 4
  6257. 4
  6258. 4
  6259. 4
  6260. 4
  6261. 4
  6262. 4
  6263. 4
  6264. 4
  6265. 4
  6266. 4
  6267. 4
  6268. 4
  6269. 4
  6270. 4
  6271. 4
  6272. 4
  6273. 4
  6274. 4
  6275. 4
  6276. 4
  6277. 4
  6278. 4
  6279. 4
  6280. 4
  6281. 4
  6282. 4
  6283. 4
  6284. 4
  6285. 4
  6286. 4
  6287. 4
  6288. 4
  6289. 4
  6290. 4
  6291. 4
  6292. 4
  6293. 4
  6294. 4
  6295. 4
  6296. 4
  6297. 4
  6298. 4
  6299. 4
  6300. 4
  6301. 4
  6302. 4
  6303. 4
  6304. 4
  6305. 4
  6306. 4
  6307. 4
  6308. 4
  6309. 4
  6310. 4
  6311. 4
  6312. 4
  6313. 4
  6314. 4
  6315. 4
  6316. 4
  6317. 4
  6318. 4
  6319. 4
  6320. 4
  6321. 4
  6322. US invades China 1945-46 - OK US invades Korea 1950-53 - OK US invades China (again) 1950-53 - OK US invades Guatemala 1954 - OK US invades Indonesia 1958 - OK US invades Cuba 1959-60 - OK US invades Guatemala (again) 1960 - OK US invades Belgian Congo 1964 - OK US invades Guatemala ( yet again) 1964 - OK US invades Dominican Republic 1965-66 - OK US invades Peru 1965 - OK US invades Laos 1964-73 - OK US invades Vietnam 1961-73 - OK US invades Cambodia 1969-70 - OK US invades Guatemala (and yet again) 1967-69 - OK US invades Lebanon 1982-84 - OK US invades Grenada 1983-84 - OK US invades Libya 1986 - OK US invades El Salvador 1981-92 - OK US invades Nicaragua 1981-90 - OK US invades Iran 1987-88 - OK US invades Libya (again) 1989 - OK US invades Panama 1989-90 - OK US invades Iraq 1991 - OK US invades Kuwait 1991 - OK US invades Somalia 1992-94 - OK US invades Bosnia 1995 - OK US invades Iran 1998 - OK US invades Sudan 1998 - OK US invades Afghanistan 1998 - OK US invades Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999 - OK US invades Afghanistan (again) 2001 - OK US invades Libya (yet again) 2011 - OK US invades Iraq (again) and Syria 2014 – OK US invades Somalia 2011 – OK US invades Iran 2020 – OK Russia invades Ukraine 2022 - not OK This list doesn’t include the dozens of other sovereign nations in which the US has interfered in the internal affairs of by overthrowing democratically-elected governments and installing proxies favourable to US/western interests. Including in 2014 in Ukraine itself. Also, I don’t condone Putin’s actions in Ukraine one iota. However, he is doing precisely nothing America and her partners haven’t been doing for decades. It constantly bemuses me how the west completely and utterly ignores the buckets of foreign blood they have spilt, while pointing the finger at the likes of Putin. The double standards hypocrisy is staggering as Putin is merely apeing the geopolitical modus operandi of the west and simply playing the tune it has been playing since at least 1492. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
    4
  6323. 4
  6324. 4
  6325. 4
  6326. 4
  6327. 4
  6328. 4
  6329. 4
  6330. 4
  6331. 4
  6332. 4
  6333. 4
  6334. 4
  6335. 4
  6336. 4
  6337. 4
  6338. 4
  6339. 4
  6340. 4
  6341. 4
  6342. 4
  6343. 4
  6344. 4
  6345. 4
  6346. 4
  6347. 4
  6348. 4
  6349. 4
  6350. 4
  6351. 4
  6352. 4
  6353. 4
  6354. 4
  6355. 4
  6356. 4
  6357. 4
  6358. 4
  6359. 4
  6360. 4
  6361. 4
  6362. 4
  6363. 4
  6364. 4
  6365. 4
  6366. 4
  6367. 3
  6368. 3
  6369. 3
  6370. 3
  6371. 3
  6372. 3
  6373. 3
  6374. 3
  6375. 3
  6376. 3
  6377. 3
  6378. 3
  6379. 3
  6380. 3
  6381. 3
  6382. 3
  6383. 3
  6384. 3
  6385. 3
  6386. 3
  6387. 3
  6388. 3
  6389. 3
  6390. 3
  6391. 3
  6392. 3
  6393. 3
  6394. 3
  6395. 3
  6396. 3
  6397. 3
  6398. 3
  6399. 3
  6400. US invades China 1945-46 - OK US invades Korea 1950-53 - OK US invades China (again) 1950-53 - OK US invades Guatemala 1954 - OK US invades Indonesia 1958 - OK US invades Cuba 1959-60 - OK US invades Guatemala (again) 1960 - OK US invades Belgian Congo 1964 - OK US invades Guatemala ( yet again) 1964 - OK US invades Dominican Republic 1965-66 - OK US invades Peru 1965 - OK US invades Laos 1964-73 - OK US invades Vietnam 1961-73 - OK US invades Cambodia 1969-70 - OK US invades Guatemala (and yet again) 1967-69 - OK US invades Lebanon 1982-84 - OK US invades Grenada 1983-84 - OK US invades Libya 1986 - OK US invades El Salvador 1981-92 - OK US invades Nicaragua 1981-90 - OK US invades Iran 1987-88 - OK US invades Libya (again) 1989 - OK US invades Panama 1989-90 - OK US invades Iraq 1991 - OK US invades Kuwait 1991 - OK US invades Somalia 1992-94 - OK US invades Bosnia 1995 - OK US invades Iran 1998 - OK US invades Sudan 1998 - OK US invades Afghanistan 1998 - OK US invades Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999 - OK US invades Afghanistan (again) 2001 - OK US invades Libya (yet again) 2011 - OK US invades Iraq (again) and Syria 2014 – OK US invades Somalia 2011 – OK US invades Iran 2020 – OK Russia invades Ukraine 2022 - not OK This list doesn’t include the dozens of other sovereign nations in which the US has interfered in the internal affairs of by overthrowing democratically-elected governments and installing proxies favourable to US/western interests. Including in 2014 in Ukraine itself. Also, I don’t condone Putin’s actions in Ukraine one iota. However, he is doing precisely nothing America and her partners haven’t been doing for decades. It constantly bemuses me how the west completely and utterly ignores the buckets of foreign blood they have spilt, while pointing the finger at the likes of Putin. The double standards hypocrisy is staggering as Putin is merely apeing the geopolitical modus operandi of the west and simply playing the tune it has been playing since at least 1492. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
    3
  6401. 3
  6402. 3
  6403. 3
  6404. 3
  6405. 3
  6406. 3
  6407. 3
  6408. 3
  6409. 3
  6410. 3
  6411. 3
  6412. 3
  6413. 3
  6414. 3
  6415. 3
  6416. 3
  6417. 3
  6418. 3
  6419. 3
  6420. 3
  6421. 3
  6422. 3
  6423. 3
  6424. 3
  6425. 3
  6426. 3
  6427. 3
  6428. 3
  6429. 3
  6430. 3
  6431. 3
  6432. 3
  6433. 3
  6434. 3
  6435. 3
  6436. 3
  6437. 3
  6438. 3
  6439. 3
  6440. 3
  6441. 3
  6442. 3
  6443. 3
  6444. 3
  6445. 3
  6446. 3
  6447. 3
  6448. 3
  6449. 3
  6450. 3
  6451. 3
  6452. 3
  6453. 3
  6454. 3
  6455. 3
  6456. 3
  6457. 3
  6458. 3
  6459. 3
  6460.  @keiolge  You make no effort to understand what he might be doing. You make no effort to step into the shoes of another and see what they see. That doesn’t justify anything and you are not necessarily agreeing with another when you try to understand their point of view. No one does anything inappropriate given their model of the world. All I’m doing here is trying to understand Putin while condemning him every step of the way as I do so. If you can’t see this then so be it. I repeat, I’m apolitical, agnostic, anational. I happen to think, that along with organised religion, nationalism has been the most baleful blight humans ever had the misfortune to invent. I refuse to hitch any part of my identity to a random, arbitrary accident of birth, as that’s just irrational and stupid. I had no say where I was born, and could have been born anywhere, so I’m not going to take some kind of weird unearned credit for this. It’s precisely for this reason that I’m coming at this Russia/Ukraine thing as a neutral. I can see both sides. I wholeheartedly disagree with what Putin is doing. He’s evil. However, and this is the key point of this whole thread for me: from Putin’s point of view I can see why he might be doing this - a mixture of naked aggressive evil, yes, but also he’s thinking strategically and clearly sees Ukrainians and Ukraine as part of the greater motherland Russia he has concocted in his strange mind. In all this, he is wrong to violently invade another sovereign territory and impose his will.
    3
  6461. 3
  6462. 3
  6463. 3
  6464. 3
  6465. 3
  6466. 3
  6467. 3
  6468. 3
  6469. 3
  6470. 3
  6471. 3
  6472. 3
  6473. 3
  6474. 3
  6475. 3
  6476. 3
  6477. 3
  6478. 3
  6479. 3
  6480. US invades China 1945-46 - OK US invades Korea 1950-53 - OK US invades China (again) 1950-53 - OK US invades Guatemala 1954 - OK US invades Indonesia 1958 - OK US invades Cuba 1959-60 - OK US invades Guatemala 1960 - OK US invades Belgian Congo 1964 - OK US invades Guatemala (again) 1964 - OK US invades Dominican Republic 1965-66 - OK US invades Peru 1965 - OK US invades Laos 1964-73 - OK US invades Vietnam 1961-73 - OK US invades Cambodia 1969-70 - OK US invades Guatemala (yet again) 1967-69 - OK US invades Lebanon 1982-84 - OK US invades Grenada 1983-84 - OK US invades Libya 1986 - OK US invades El Salvador 1981-92 - OK US invades Nicaragua 1981-90 - OK US invades Iran 1987-88 - OK US invades Libya (again) 1989 - OK US invades Panama 1989-90 - OK US invades Iraq 1991 - OK US invades Kuwait 1991 - OK US invades Somalia 1992-94 - OK US invades Bosnia 1995 - OK US invades Iran 1998 - OK US invades Sudan 1998 - OK US invades Afghanistan 1998 - OK US invades Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999 - OK US invades Afghanistan (again) 2001 - OK US invades Libya (yet again) 2011 - OK US invades Iraq (again) and Syria 2014 – OK US invades Somalia 2011 – OK US invades Iran 2020 – OK Russia invades Ukraine 2022 - not OK I don’t condone Putin’s actions in Ukraine one iota. However, he is doing precisely nothing America and her partners haven’t been doing for decades. It constantly bemuses me how the west completely and utterly ignores the buckets of foreign blood they have spilt, while pointing the finger at the likes of Putin. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
    3
  6481. 3
  6482. 3
  6483. 3
  6484. 3
  6485. 3
  6486. 3
  6487. 3
  6488. 3
  6489. 3
  6490. 3
  6491. 3
  6492. 3
  6493. 3
  6494. 3
  6495. 3
  6496. 3
  6497. 3
  6498. 3
  6499. 3
  6500. 3
  6501. 3
  6502. 3
  6503. 3
  6504. 3
  6505. 3
  6506. 3
  6507. 3
  6508. 3
  6509. 3
  6510. 3
  6511. 3
  6512. 3
  6513. 3
  6514. 3
  6515. 3
  6516. 3
  6517. 3
  6518. 3
  6519. 3
  6520. 3
  6521. 3
  6522. 3
  6523. 3
  6524. 3
  6525. 3
  6526. 3
  6527. 3
  6528. 3
  6529. 3
  6530. 3
  6531. 3
  6532. 3
  6533. 3
  6534. 3
  6535. 3
  6536. 3
  6537. 3
  6538. 3
  6539. 3
  6540. 3
  6541. 3
  6542. 3
  6543. 3
  6544. 3
  6545. 3
  6546. 3
  6547. 3
  6548. 3
  6549. 3
  6550. 3
  6551. 3
  6552. 3
  6553. 3
  6554. 3
  6555. 3
  6556. 3
  6557. 3
  6558. 3
  6559. 3
  6560. 3
  6561. 3
  6562. 3
  6563. 3
  6564. 3
  6565. 3
  6566. 3
  6567. 3
  6568. 3
  6569. 3
  6570. 3
  6571. 3
  6572. 3
  6573. 3
  6574. 3
  6575. 3
  6576. 3
  6577. 3
  6578. 3
  6579. 3
  6580. 3
  6581. 3
  6582. 3
  6583. 3
  6584. 3
  6585. 3
  6586. 3
  6587. 3
  6588. 3
  6589. 3
  6590.  @EE-kt8sh  True. But two wrongs don’t make a right. Although Russia is an aggressor for sure here, it’s hardly been unprovoked, and this is really a Civil War (particularly from Putin’s point of view). NATO reneging on its agreement not to expand post 1989 has provoked Putin. Casual flouting of 2014 Minsk agreements not to aggress against pro-Russian Ukrainians in the east, leading to the loss of about 14,000 has provoked Putin. The 2014 coup having much evidence (surprise! surprise!) of the paw prints of the CIA\USA has provoked Putin. Zelensky has publicly expressed a desire to acquire nuclear weapons, understandably spooking Moscow and thereby provoking Putin. There’s also the stench of corrupt family Biden deals with Ukraine, as well, which might explain sleepy Joe’s reluctance to get directly involved here. For now. Add to this Putin’s statement that the dissolution of the Soviet Empire was the ‘most tragic geopolitical event of the 20th century’, along with his belief in the greater mother Russia project and bringing the recalcitrant (as he sees them) Ukrainians back into the Slavic familial bosom and you have a perfect storm in which Putin feels justified in rolling his tanks into another sovereign, self-governing territory. He’s deluded in doing this, of course, as most Ukrainians want nothing to do with him, and rightly so. None of the above makes what Putin is doing right, but it makes it a little more understandable from Putin’s/Russia’s point of view.
    3
  6591. 3
  6592. 3
  6593. 3
  6594. 3
  6595. 3
  6596. 3
  6597. 3
  6598. 3
  6599. 3
  6600. 3
  6601. 3
  6602. 3
  6603. 3
  6604. 3
  6605. 3
  6606. 3
  6607. 3
  6608. 3
  6609. 3
  6610. 3
  6611. 3
  6612. 3
  6613. 3
  6614. 3
  6615. 3
  6616. 3
  6617. 3
  6618. 3
  6619. 3
  6620. 3
  6621. 3
  6622. 3
  6623. 3
  6624. 3
  6625. 3
  6626. 3
  6627. 3
  6628. 3
  6629. 3
  6630. 3
  6631. 3
  6632. 3
  6633. 3
  6634. 3
  6635. 3
  6636. 3
  6637. 3
  6638. 3
  6639. 3
  6640. 3
  6641. 3
  6642. 3
  6643. 3
  6644. 3
  6645. 3
  6646. 3
  6647. 3
  6648. 3
  6649. 3
  6650. 3
  6651. 3
  6652. 3
  6653. 3
  6654. 3
  6655. 3
  6656. 3
  6657. 3
  6658. 3
  6659. 3
  6660. 3
  6661. 3
  6662. 3
  6663. 3
  6664. 3
  6665. 3
  6666. 3
  6667. 3
  6668. 3
  6669. 3
  6670. 3
  6671. 3
  6672. 3
  6673. 3
  6674. 3
  6675. 3
  6676. 3
  6677. 3
  6678. 3
  6679. 3
  6680. 3
  6681. 3
  6682. 3
  6683. 3
  6684. 3
  6685. 3
  6686. 3
  6687. 3
  6688. 3
  6689. 3
  6690. 3
  6691. 3
  6692. 3
  6693. 3
  6694. 3
  6695. 3
  6696. 3
  6697. 3
  6698. 3
  6699. 3
  6700. 3
  6701. 3
  6702. 3
  6703. 3
  6704. 3
  6705. 3
  6706. 3
  6707. 3
  6708. 3
  6709. 3
  6710. 3
  6711. 3
  6712. 3
  6713. 3
  6714. 3
  6715. 3
  6716. 3
  6717. 3
  6718. 3
  6719. 3
  6720. 3
  6721. 3
  6722. 3
  6723. 3
  6724. 3
  6725. 3
  6726. 3
  6727. 3
  6728. 3
  6729. 3
  6730. 3
  6731. 3
  6732. 3
  6733. 3
  6734. 3
  6735. 3
  6736. 3
  6737. 3
  6738. 3
  6739. 3
  6740. 3
  6741. 3
  6742. 3
  6743. 3
  6744. 3
  6745. 3
  6746. 3
  6747. 3
  6748. 3
  6749. 3
  6750. 3
  6751. 3
  6752. 3
  6753. 3
  6754. 3
  6755. 3
  6756. 3
  6757. 3
  6758. 3
  6759. 3
  6760. 3
  6761. 3
  6762. 3
  6763. 3
  6764. 3
  6765. 3
  6766. 3
  6767. 3
  6768. 3
  6769. 3
  6770. 3
  6771. 3
  6772. 3
  6773. 3
  6774. 3
  6775. 3
  6776. 3
  6777. 3
  6778. 3
  6779. 3
  6780. 3
  6781. 3
  6782. 3
  6783. 3
  6784. 3
  6785. 3
  6786. 3
  6787. 3
  6788. 3
  6789. 3
  6790. 3
  6791. 3
  6792. 3
  6793. 3
  6794. 3
  6795. 3
  6796. 3
  6797. 3
  6798. 3
  6799. 3
  6800. 3
  6801. 3
  6802. 3
  6803. 3
  6804. 3
  6805. 3
  6806. 3
  6807. 3
  6808. 3
  6809. 3
  6810. 3
  6811. 3
  6812. 3
  6813. 3
  6814. 3
  6815. 3
  6816. 3
  6817. 3
  6818. 3
  6819. 3
  6820. 3
  6821. 3
  6822. 3
  6823. 3
  6824. 3
  6825. 3
  6826. 3
  6827. 3
  6828. 3
  6829. 3
  6830. 3
  6831. 3
  6832. 3
  6833. 3
  6834. 3
  6835. 3
  6836. 3
  6837. 3
  6838. 3
  6839. 3
  6840. 3
  6841. 3
  6842. 3
  6843. 3
  6844. 3
  6845. 3
  6846. 3
  6847. 3
  6848. 3
  6849. 3
  6850. 3
  6851. 3
  6852. 3
  6853. 3
  6854. 3
  6855. 3
  6856. 3
  6857. 3
  6858. 3
  6859. 3
  6860. 3
  6861. 3
  6862. 3
  6863. 3
  6864. 3
  6865. 3
  6866. 3
  6867. 3
  6868. 3
  6869. 3
  6870. 3
  6871. 3
  6872. 3
  6873. 3
  6874. 3
  6875. 3
  6876. 3
  6877. 3
  6878. 3
  6879. 3
  6880. 3
  6881. 3
  6882. 3
  6883. 3
  6884. 3
  6885. 3
  6886. 3
  6887. 3
  6888. 3
  6889. 3
  6890. 3
  6891. 3
  6892. 3
  6893. 3
  6894. 3
  6895. 3
  6896. 3
  6897. 3
  6898. 3
  6899. 3
  6900. 3
  6901. 3
  6902. 3
  6903. 3
  6904. 3
  6905. 3
  6906. 3
  6907. 3
  6908. 3
  6909. 3
  6910. 3
  6911. 3
  6912. 3
  6913. 3
  6914. 3
  6915. 3
  6916. 3
  6917. 3
  6918. 3
  6919. 3
  6920. 3
  6921. 3
  6922. 3
  6923. 3
  6924. 3
  6925. 3
  6926. 3
  6927. 3
  6928. 3
  6929. 3
  6930. 3
  6931. 3
  6932. 3
  6933. 3
  6934. 3
  6935. 3
  6936. 3
  6937. 3
  6938. 3
  6939. 3
  6940. 3
  6941. 3
  6942. 3
  6943. 3
  6944. 3
  6945. 3
  6946. 3
  6947. 3
  6948. 3
  6949. 3
  6950. 3
  6951. 3
  6952. 3
  6953. 3
  6954. 3
  6955. 3
  6956. 3
  6957. 3
  6958. 3
  6959. 3
  6960. 3
  6961. 3
  6962. 3
  6963. 3
  6964. 3
  6965. 3
  6966. 3
  6967. 3
  6968. 3
  6969. 3
  6970. 3
  6971. 3
  6972. 3
  6973. 3
  6974. 3
  6975. 3
  6976. 3
  6977. 3
  6978. 3
  6979. 3
  6980. 3
  6981. 3
  6982. 3
  6983. 3
  6984. 3
  6985. 3
  6986. 3
  6987. 3
  6988. 3
  6989. 3
  6990. 3
  6991. 3
  6992. 3
  6993. 3
  6994. 3
  6995. 3
  6996. 3
  6997. 3
  6998. 3
  6999. 3
  7000. 3
  7001. 3
  7002. 3
  7003.  @Jwiznat  I never said it was ‘monocausal’. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is driven by several factors: ethnic, national, historical, and religious. Religious identity is the key factor that impacts this issue existentially. Why is religion at the core of this conflict? Several religious factors pertinent to Islam and Judaism dictate the role of religion as the main factor in the conflict, notably including the sanctity of holy sites and the apocalyptic narratives of both religions, which are detrimental to any potential for lasting peace between the two sides. Extreme religious Zionists in Israel increasingly see themselves as guardians and definers of how the Jewish state should be, and are very stringent when it comes to any concessions to the Arabs. On the other hand, Islamist groups in Palestine and elsewhere in the Islamic world advocate the necessity of liberating the “holy” territories and sites for religious reasons, and preach violence and hatred against Israel and the Jewish people. Religion-based rumors propagated by extremists in the media and social media about the hidden religious agendas of the other side exacerbate these tensions. Examples include rumors about a “Jewish Plan” to destroy al Aqsa mosque and build the Jewish third temple on its remnants, and, on the other side rumors that Muslims hold the annihilation of Jews at the core of their belief. In addition, worsening socio-economic conditions in the Arab and Islamic world contribute to the growth of religious radicalism, pushing a larger percentage of youth towards fanaticism, and religion-inspired politics. The advent of the Arab spring, ironically, also posed a threat to Arab-Israeli peace, as previously stable regimes were often challenged by extreme political views. A prominent example was the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, who after succeeding to the presidency in 2012, threatened to compromise the peace agreement with Israel based on their religious ideology – even if they did not immediately tear up the treaty. My main point is simply, that organised religion has fundamentally caused this issue.
    3
  7004. 3
  7005. 3
  7006. 3
  7007. 3
  7008. 3
  7009. 3
  7010. 3
  7011. 3
  7012. 3
  7013. 3
  7014. 3
  7015. 3
  7016. 3
  7017. 3
  7018. 3
  7019. 3
  7020. 3
  7021. 3
  7022. 3
  7023. 3
  7024. 3
  7025. 3
  7026. 3
  7027. 3
  7028. 3
  7029. 3
  7030. 3
  7031. 3
  7032. 3
  7033. 3
  7034. 3
  7035. 3
  7036. 3
  7037. 3
  7038. 3
  7039. 3
  7040. 3
  7041. 3
  7042. 3
  7043. 3
  7044. 3
  7045. 3
  7046. 3
  7047. 3
  7048. 3
  7049. 3
  7050. 3
  7051. 3
  7052. 3
  7053. 3
  7054. 3
  7055. 3
  7056. 3
  7057. 3
  7058. 3
  7059. 3
  7060. 3
  7061. 3
  7062. 3
  7063. 3
  7064. 3
  7065. 3
  7066. 3
  7067. 3
  7068. 3
  7069. 3
  7070. 3
  7071. 3
  7072. 3
  7073. 3
  7074. 3
  7075. 3
  7076. 3
  7077. 3
  7078. 3
  7079. 3
  7080. 3
  7081. 3
  7082. 3
  7083. 3
  7084. 3
  7085. 3
  7086. 3
  7087. 3
  7088. 3
  7089. 3
  7090. 3
  7091. 3
  7092. 3
  7093. 3
  7094. 3
  7095. 3
  7096. 3
  7097. 3
  7098. 3
  7099. 3
  7100. Whenever the topic of climate change/global warming comes up, as someone neither particularly right nor particularly left politically, I despair at how tribalised and polarised this debate becomes with each camp ensconced in their respective corners, equally convinced that their case is watertight. As ever with these things (and the reason I’m a centrist in almost everything), the truth lies somewhere in the middle. One of the most reasoned and balanced paragraphs I have ever read about this topic is the following from Stephen Pinker: If the emission of greenhouse gases continues, the Earth’s average temperature will rise to at least 1.5°C above the preindustrial level by the end of the 21st century, and perhaps to 4°C above that level or more. That will cause more frequent and more severe heat waves, more floods in wet regions, more droughts in dry regions, heavier storms, more severe hurricanes, lower crop yields in warm regions, the extinction of more species, the loss of coral reefs (because the oceans will be both warmer and more acidic), and an average rise in sea level of between 0.7 metres and 1.2 metres from both the melting of land ice and the expansion of seawater. (Sea level has already risen almost eight inches since 1870, and the rate of the rise appears to be accelerating.) Low-lying areas would be flooded, island nations would disappear beneath the waves, large stretches of farmland would no longer be arable, and millions of people would be displaced. The effects could get still worse in the 22nd century and beyond, and in theory could trigger upheavals such as a diversion of the Gulf Stream (which would turn Europe into Siberia) or a collapse of the Antarctic ice sheets. A rise of 2°C is considered the most that the world could reasonably adapt to, and a rise of 4°C, in the words of a 2012 World Bank report, “simply must not be allowed to occur.” The planet is warming. Fact. Humans (according to the overwhelming scientific consensus) are the principal cause of this warming over the past couple of centuries through fossil fuel burning. Now, given this, and given the consequences eloquently outlined by Pinker, we have to collectively decide whether we want to continue on this trajectory or not. For me, given the data, and given the projected consequences contingent upon that data, it makes utter sense to phase out fossil fuels. With this caveat: we must do it sensibly. They will be needed for some time to come as the transition to renewables is made. Who knows? Given that we are currently in an inter-glacial period, 500 years down the line when we have stopped using fossil fuels, the planet might start a rapid cooling trend leading to that ever-promised next Ice Age, and there might be a desperate clamour to start burning fossil fuels as quickly as possible!
    3
  7101. 3
  7102. 3
  7103. 3
  7104. 3
  7105. 3
  7106. 3
  7107. 3
  7108. 3
  7109. 3
  7110. 3
  7111. 3
  7112. 3
  7113. 3
  7114. 3
  7115. 3
  7116. 3
  7117. 3
  7118. 3
  7119. 3
  7120. 3
  7121. 3
  7122. 3
  7123. 3
  7124. 3
  7125. 3
  7126. 3
  7127. 3
  7128. 3
  7129. 3
  7130. 3
  7131. 3
  7132. 3
  7133. 3
  7134. 3
  7135. 3
  7136. 3
  7137. 3
  7138. 3
  7139. 3
  7140. 3
  7141. 3
  7142. 3
  7143. 3
  7144. 3
  7145. 3
  7146. 3
  7147. 3
  7148. 3
  7149. 3
  7150. 3
  7151. 3
  7152. 3
  7153. 3
  7154. 3
  7155. 3
  7156. 3
  7157. 3
  7158. 3
  7159. 3
  7160. 3
  7161. 3
  7162. 3
  7163. 3
  7164. 3
  7165. 3
  7166. 3
  7167. 3
  7168. 3
  7169. 3
  7170. 3
  7171. 3
  7172. 3
  7173. 3
  7174. 3
  7175. 3
  7176. 3
  7177. 3
  7178. 3
  7179. 3
  7180. 3
  7181. 3
  7182. 3
  7183. 3
  7184. 3
  7185. 3
  7186. 3
  7187. 3
  7188. 3
  7189. 3
  7190. 3
  7191. 3
  7192. 3
  7193. 3
  7194. 3
  7195. 3
  7196. 3
  7197. 3
  7198. 3
  7199. 3
  7200. 3
  7201. 3
  7202. 3
  7203. 3
  7204. 3
  7205. 3
  7206. 3
  7207. 3
  7208. 3
  7209. 3
  7210. 3
  7211. 3
  7212. 3
  7213. 3
  7214. 3
  7215. 3
  7216. 3
  7217. 3
  7218. 3
  7219. 3
  7220. 3
  7221. 3
  7222. 3
  7223. 3
  7224. 3
  7225. 3
  7226. 3
  7227. 3
  7228. 3
  7229. 3
  7230. 3
  7231. 3
  7232. 3
  7233. 3
  7234. 3
  7235. 3
  7236. 3
  7237. 3
  7238. 3
  7239. 3
  7240. 3
  7241. 3
  7242. 3
  7243. 3
  7244. 3
  7245. 3
  7246. 3
  7247. 3
  7248. 3
  7249. 3
  7250. 3
  7251. 3
  7252. 3
  7253. 3
  7254. 3
  7255. 3
  7256. 3
  7257. 3
  7258. 3
  7259. 3
  7260. 3
  7261. 3
  7262. 3
  7263. 3
  7264. 3
  7265. 3
  7266. 3
  7267. 3
  7268. 3
  7269. 3
  7270. 3
  7271. 3
  7272. 3
  7273. 3
  7274. 3
  7275. 3
  7276. 3
  7277. 3
  7278. 3
  7279. 3
  7280. 3
  7281. 3
  7282. 3
  7283. 3
  7284. 3
  7285. 3
  7286. 3
  7287. 3
  7288. 3
  7289. 3
  7290. 3
  7291. 3
  7292. 3
  7293. 3
  7294. 3
  7295. 3
  7296. 3
  7297. 3
  7298. 3
  7299. 3
  7300. 3
  7301. 3
  7302. 3
  7303. 3
  7304. 3
  7305. 3
  7306. 3
  7307. 3
  7308. 3
  7309. 3
  7310. 3
  7311. 3
  7312. 3
  7313. 3
  7314. 3
  7315. 3
  7316. 3
  7317. 3
  7318. 3
  7319. 3
  7320. 3
  7321. 3
  7322. 3
  7323. 3
  7324. 3
  7325. 3
  7326. 3
  7327. 3
  7328. 3
  7329. 3
  7330. 3
  7331. 3
  7332. 3
  7333. 3
  7334. 3
  7335. 3
  7336. 3
  7337. 3
  7338. 3
  7339. 3
  7340. 3
  7341. 3
  7342. 3
  7343. 3
  7344. 3
  7345. 3
  7346. 3
  7347. 3
  7348. 3
  7349. 3
  7350. 3
  7351. 3
  7352. 3
  7353. 3
  7354. 3
  7355. 3
  7356. 3
  7357. 3
  7358. 3
  7359. 3
  7360. 3
  7361. 3
  7362. 3
  7363. 3
  7364. 3
  7365. 3
  7366. 3
  7367. 3
  7368. 3
  7369. 3
  7370. 3
  7371. 3
  7372. 3
  7373. 3
  7374. 3
  7375. 3
  7376. ⁠​​⁠​​⁠​​⁠​​⁠Why should anyone be taking lessons in anything (let alone telling consenting f*cking adults what they can and cannot do and with whom in the bedroom!🤦‍♂️) from a corrupt, tin-pot dictator presiding over a corrupt, tin-pot poverty-blasted country? There is a reason why great waves of African migrants seek a better life elsewhere. They are leaving a continent which has, historically, not pulled its weight (and continues to not pull its weight) on the world stage to go to other more enlightened, more prosperous, freer places. A good indicator of this situation is if we take a look at all the key inventions/discoveries humanity has attained, virtually none of them are out of Africa. See? Not pulling and continuing to not pull its weight. ​​⁠1. The wheel. (Sumerians) 2. Printing press. (Gutenberg - German) 3. Penicillin. (Fleming - Scottish) 4. Compass. (Chinese) 5. Light bulb. (Edison - American) 6. Telephone. (Graham Bell - Scottish) 7. Television. (Logie Baird - Scottish) 8. Internal combustion engine. (Étienne Lenoir - French) 9. The pill. (Pincus/Rock - American) 10. Internet. (Berners-Lee - English) 11. Concrete. (Nabataeans) 12. Telescope. (Lippershey - Dutch) 13. Batteries. (Volta - Italian) 14. Aeroplane. (Wright brothers - American) 15. Fridge. (Wolf - American) 16. Nuclear energy. (Fermi - Italian) 17. Vaccines. (Jenner - English) 18. X-rays. (Röntgen - German) 19. Cars. (Benz - German) 20. Radio. (Marconi - Italian) 21. Anaesthetics. (Morton - American) 22. Genetics. (Mendel - Austrian) 23. Computer. (Babbage - English) 24. Paper. (Ts'ai Lun - Chinese) 25. Steam engine. (Watt - Scottish) 26. Electricity. (Benjamin Franklin - American) 27. Steel. (Henry Bessemer - English) 28. Hindu-Arabic numeral system. (India) 29. Remote communication. (Samuel Morse - American) 30. Pasteurisation. (Louis Pasteur - French) 31. The scientific method. (Francis Bacon - English) 32. Flush toilet. (John Harrington - English) 33. Sailboat. (Mesopotamia) 34. Calculus. (Issac Newton - English/Gottfried Leibniz - German) 35. Copernican theory. (Nicolaus Copernicus - Polish) 36. Gravity. (Isaac Newton - English) 37. Theory of evolution. (Charles Darwin - English) 38. Double-entry accounting. (Luca Pacioli - Italian) 39. Mirror. (Justus von Liebig - German) 40. Electric motor. (Thomas Davenport - American) 41. GPS. (Bradford Parkinson - American) 42. DNA double-helix. (Franklin/Crick/Watson - American/English) 43. Prozac. (Klaus Schmiegel - German) 44. Industrial robot. (George Devol - American) 45. LED (Nick Holonyak - American) 46. Drones. (Abraham Karem - Iraq) 47. Digital music. (James Russell - American) 48. MRI. (Raymond Damadian - American) 49. Genetic sequencing. (Fredrick Sanger - English) 50. Rubber. (Charles Goodyear - American)
    3
  7377. 3
  7378. 3
  7379. 3
  7380. 3
  7381. 3
  7382. 3
  7383. 3
  7384. 3
  7385. 3
  7386. 3
  7387. 3
  7388. 3
  7389. 3
  7390. 3
  7391. 3
  7392. 3
  7393. 3
  7394. 3
  7395. 3
  7396. 3
  7397. 3
  7398. 3
  7399. 3
  7400. 3
  7401. 3
  7402. 3
  7403. 3
  7404. 3
  7405. 3
  7406. 3
  7407. 3
  7408. 3
  7409. 3
  7410. 3
  7411. 3
  7412. 3
  7413. 3
  7414. 3
  7415. 3
  7416. 3
  7417. 3
  7418. 3
  7419. 3
  7420. 3
  7421. 3
  7422. 3
  7423. 3
  7424. 3
  7425. 3
  7426. 3
  7427. 3
  7428. 3
  7429. 3
  7430. 3
  7431. 3
  7432. 3
  7433. 3
  7434. 3
  7435. 3
  7436. 3
  7437. 3
  7438. 3
  7439. 3
  7440. 3
  7441. 3
  7442. 3
  7443. 3
  7444. 3
  7445. 3
  7446. 3
  7447. 3
  7448. 3
  7449. 3
  7450. 3
  7451. 3
  7452. 3
  7453. 3
  7454. 3
  7455. 3
  7456. 3
  7457. 3
  7458. 3
  7459. 3
  7460. 3
  7461. 3
  7462. 3
  7463. 3
  7464. 3
  7465. 3
  7466. 3
  7467. 3
  7468. 3
  7469. 3
  7470. 3
  7471. 3
  7472. 3
  7473. 3
  7474. 3
  7475. 3
  7476. 3
  7477. 3
  7478. 3
  7479. 3
  7480. 3
  7481. 3
  7482. 3
  7483. 3
  7484. 3
  7485. 3
  7486. 3
  7487. 3
  7488. 3
  7489. 3
  7490. 3
  7491. 3
  7492. 3
  7493. 3
  7494. 3
  7495. 3
  7496. 3
  7497. 3
  7498. 3
  7499. 3
  7500. 3
  7501. 3
  7502. 3
  7503. 3
  7504. 3
  7505. 3
  7506. 3
  7507. 3
  7508. 3
  7509. 3
  7510. 3
  7511. 3
  7512. 3
  7513. 3
  7514. 3
  7515. 3
  7516. 3
  7517. 3
  7518. 3
  7519. 3
  7520. 3
  7521. 3
  7522. 3
  7523. 3
  7524. 3
  7525. 3
  7526. 3
  7527. There is a direct correlation between countries which belong to the Commonwealth, and therefore have previously been under British rule, and countries that still have homophobic biphobic and/or transphobic legislature in their constitutions. 25% of the world’s population (2.4 billion people) currently live in a country belonging to the Commonwealth, however they make up a disproportionately large 50 per cent of countries that still criminalise homosexuality. There are currently 64 countries (out of 195) in the world that criminalise homosexuality. Of these 64, almost half (29) belong to the Commonwealth. Africa Algeria Cameroon ✅ Chad Comoros Egypt Eritrea Eswatini (Swaziland) ✅ Ethiopia Gambia ✅ Ghana ✅ Guinea Kenya ✅ Liberia Libya Malawi ✅ Mauritania Morocco Nigeria ✅ Senegal Sierra Leone ✅ Somalia South Sudan Sudan Tanzania Togo ✅ Tunisia Uganda ✅ Zambia ✅ Zimbabwe ✅ Asia, including the Middle East Afghanistan Bangladesh ✅ Brunei ✅ Indonesia Iran Iraq Kuwait Lebanon Malaysia ✅ Maldives ✅ Myanmar Oman Pakistan ✅ Palestine Qatar Saudi Arabia Sri Lanka ✅ Syria Turkmenistan United Arab Emirates Uzbekistan Yemen Americas Grenada ✅ Guyana ✅ Jamaica ✅ St Lucia ✅ St Vincent & the Grenadines ✅ Oceania Kiribati ✅ Niue Papua New Guinea ✅ Samoa ✅ Solomon Islands ✅ Tonga ✅ Tuvalu ✅ ✅ Commonwealth member The vast majority of the remaining 64 are majority Islamic. What does this prove? Well, organised religion plays a vital role in the criminalisation of homosexuality. However, the key takeaway for the purposes of this video, is that in Uganda, prior to the widespread introduction of Christianity (Uganda is currently 84% Christian/14% Muslim) homosexuality was largely tolerated and not legislated for within the various tribal denominations. At worst, in most cases, it was merely ignored. Yet here we have Museveni telling the ‘evil West’ to butt-out, when the criminalisation of homosexuality was brought in directly on the back of a Bible (…and a Quran!) by a bunch of Westerners! Hypocrisy? 🤦‍♂️
    3
  7528. 3
  7529. 3
  7530. 3
  7531. 3
  7532. 3
  7533. 3
  7534. 3
  7535. 3
  7536. Here’s what we’re dealing with, folks👉 “You know that most cases of FGM are consensual, right? Many people are raised in environments where this practice is normalised, so they don’t see any issue with it. They consent to it.” (Jegafud 🤡 🤦‍♂️) Don’t be silly, son. Do you honestly think 12 year old girls in their right minds are going to willingly consent to having their genitals lopped off? That admission alone demonstrates where you are at. 🤦‍♂️Can you not think for yourself, for once, dude? I suggest to you, aged 12, that we chop off your cock for no reason. Do you consent to this? 🤦‍♂️ “Listen, hun, after school today me and your mother are going to take you to have a completely unnecessary medical procedure involving having your clitoris hacked off thereby leading to your being unable to have sexual pleasure ever and leading to the following possible complications:” •severe pain •excessive bleeding (haemorrhage) •genital tissue swelling •fever •infections e.g., tetanus •urinary problems •wound healing problems •injury to surrounding genital tissue •shock •vaginal problems (discharge, itching, bacterial vaginosis and other infections) menstrual problems (painful menstruations, difficulty in passing menstrual blood, etc.) •scar tissue and keloid •sexual problems (pain during intercourse, decreased satisfaction) •increased risk of childbirth complications (difficult delivery, excessive bleeding, caesarean section, need to resuscitate the baby, etc.) and newborn deaths •need for later surgeries: for example, the sealing or narrowing of the vaginal opening (type 3) may lead to the practice of cutting open the sealed vagina later to allow for sexual intercourse and childbirth (deinfibulation). Sometimes genital tissue is stitched again several times, including after childbirth, hence the woman goes through repeated opening and closing procedures, further increasing both immediate and long-term risks •psychological problems (depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, low self-esteem, etc.) •death “Now, darling, would you like to consent to this completely unnecessary procedure?” 🤦‍♂️
    3
  7537. 3
  7538. 3
  7539. 3
  7540. 3
  7541. 3
  7542. 3
  7543. 3
  7544. 3
  7545. 3
  7546. 3
  7547. 3
  7548. 3
  7549. 3
  7550. 3
  7551. 3
  7552. 3
  7553. 3
  7554. 3
  7555. 3
  7556. 3
  7557. 3
  7558. It’s a process. It’s a process whereby gay men and women simply gain the right to have consensual adult sex free of fear of criminalisation involving fines, imprisonment or worse, wherever they are on the planet. The following is a timeline list of when and where homosexuality was decriminalised. This list is interesting as it gives the lie, somewhat, to the idea that decriminalising homosexuality is a wholly (or even a mainly) ‘Western thing’, so apparently feared by lube-head here. To pick some examples at random to demonstrate this: Turkey decriminalised in 1858; Japan in 1882; Taiwan in 1912; Thailand in 1956… while it was as late as 1967 in England/Wales and, remarkably, even later in the country of my birth, Scotland, in 1981. Equally remarkably, it was as late as 1993 before it was decriminalised in Washington DC, another 10 years after this before all the states had decriminalised. Added to this is the notable fact that in the list where homosexuality has never been illegal, almost every single country, without exception, is non-Western. •Never been illegal Aruba, Netherlands Benin Burkina Faso Cambodia Central African Republic Cocos (Keeling) Islands Republic of the Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo Christmas Island, Australia Curaçao Curaçao, Netherlands Djibouti Equatorial Guinea French Polynesia, France Indonesia Ivory Coast Laos Madagascar Mali Mayotte, France Federated States of Micronesia New Caledonia, France Niger North Korea Rwanda Sint Maarten, Netherlands South Korea Philippines Vietnam Wallis and Futuna, France •18th Century 1791: Andorra France Kingdom of France (includes Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique, Réunion, San Barthélemy, Saint Martin, and Saint Pierre and Miquelon) Haiti Saint-Domingue (Haiti) 1793: Monaco 1794: Luxembourg 1795: Belgium 1798: Canton of Geneva, Switzerland Ticino, Switzerland Vaud, Switzerland Valais, Switzerland •19th Century 1811: Netherlands 1822: Dominican Republic El Salvador 1830: Brazil 1832: Bolivia 1853: Argentina 1858: Turkey 1864: San Marino 1869: Suriname 1871: Guatemala Mexico 1882: Japan 1890: Italy Vatican City 1899: Honduras •20th Century 1912: Taiwan 1924: Peru 1933: Denmark (includes Greenland and Faroe Islands) 1932: Poland 1934: Uruguay 1940: Iceland 1942: Switzerland 1944: Sweden 1951: Greece Jordan Palestine 1956: Thailand 1961: Hungary 1962: Czechoslovakia Illinois, United States 1967: England and Wales, United Kingdom 1968: Bulgaria East Germany 1969: Canada West Germany 1971: Austria Connecticut, United States Costa Rica Finland 1972: Colorado, United States Oregon, United States Norway 1973: Delaware, United States Hawaii, United States Malta North Dakota, United States 1974: Massachusetts, United States Ohio, United States 1975: East Timor New Hampshire, United States New Mexico, United States South Australia 1976: Australian Capital Territory Bahrain California, United States Indiana, United States Maine, United States Washington (state), United States West Virginia, United States 1977: Croatia Montenegro Slovenia South Dakota, United States Vermont, United States Wyoming, United States 1978: Guam, United States Iowa, United States Nebraska, United States New Jersey, United States 1979: Cuba Spain 1980: American, United States New York, United States Pennsylvania, United States 1981: Colombia Scotland, United Kingdom Victoria, Australia 1982: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom 1983: Guernsey, United Kingdom Northern Mariana Islands Northern Territory, Australia Portugal Wisconsin, United States 1984: New South Wales, Australia 1985: Virgin Islands, United States 1986: New Zealand 1988: Israel 1989: Falkland Islands, United Kingdom Liechtenstein 1990: Jersey, United Kingdom Paraguay Western Australia 1991: Bahamas Abkhazia Hong Kong Queensland, Australia South Ossetia Ukraine 1992: Estonia Isle of Man, United Kingdom Kentucky, United States Latvia 1993: Washington, D.C. District of Columbia, United States Gibraltar, United Kingdom Guinea-Bissau Republic of Ireland Lithuania Mongolia Nevada Nevada, United States Norfolk Island, Australia Russia 1994: Kosovo Belarus Bermuda Bermuda, United Kingdom Serbia 1995: Albania Moldova 1996: Bosnia and Herzegovina Portuguese Macau North Macedonia Romania Tennessee, United States 1997: China Ecuador Montana, United States Tasmania, Australia Venezuela 1998: Cyprus Cyprus Georgia, United States Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina Rhode Island, United States South Africa Tajikistan 1999: Chile Maryland, United States 2000: Akrotiri and Dhekelia, United Kingdom Azerbaijan Georgia (country) •21st Century 2001: Anguilla, United Kingdom Arizona, United States Bosnia and Herzegovina British Virgin Islands Cayman Islands, United Kingdom Minnesota, United States Montserrat, United Kingdom Saint Helena Pitcairn Islands, United Kingdom Turks and Caicos Islands, United Kingdom 2002: Arkansas, United States Transnistria 2003: Armenia Tokelau, New Zealand United States (nationwide) 2004: Cape Verde 2005: Marshall Islands 2007: Nepal Vanuatu 2008: Nicaragua Panama 2010: Fiji 2012: Lesotho São Tomé and Príncipe 2014: Northern Cyprus Palau 2015: Mozambique 2016: Belize Nauru Seychelles 2018: India Trinidad and Tobago 2019: Botswana 2020: Gabon 2021: Angola Bhutan 2022: Antigua and Barbuda Barbados Singapore Saint Kitts and Nevis 2023: Cook Islands, New Zealand Mauritius 2024: Dominica Namibia
    3
  7559. “You know that most cases of FGM are consensual, right? Many people are raised in environments where this practice is normalised, so they don’t see any issue with it. They consent to it.” (Jegamespeed5399) 🤦‍♂️ Don’t be silly, son. Do you honestly think 12 year old girls in their right minds are going to willingly consent to having their genitals lopped off? That admission alone demonstrates where you are at. 🤦‍♂️Can you not think for yourself, for once, dude? I suggest to you, aged 12, that we chop off your cock for no reason. Do you consent to this? 🤦‍♂️ “Listen, hun, after school today me and your mother are going to take you to have a completely unnecessary medical procedure involving having your clitoris hacked off thereby leading to your being unable to have sexual pleasure ever and leading to the following possible complications:” •severe pain •excessive bleeding (haemorrhage) •genital tissue swelling •fever •infections e.g., tetanus •urinary problems •wound healing problems •injury to surrounding genital tissue •shock •vaginal problems (discharge, itching, bacterial vaginosis and other infections) menstrual problems (painful menstruations, difficulty in passing menstrual blood, etc.) •scar tissue and keloid •sexual problems (pain during intercourse, decreased satisfaction) •increased risk of childbirth complications (difficult delivery, excessive bleeding, caesarean section, need to resuscitate the baby, etc.) and newborn deaths •need for later surgeries: for example, the sealing or narrowing of the vaginal opening (type 3) may lead to the practice of cutting open the sealed vagina later to allow for sexual intercourse and childbirth (deinfibulation). Sometimes genital tissue is stitched again several times, including after childbirth, hence the woman goes through repeated opening and closing procedures, further increasing both immediate and long-term risks •psychological problems (depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, low self-esteem, etc.) •death “Now, darling, would you like to consent to this completely unnecessary procedure?” 🤦‍♂️
    3
  7560. 3
  7561. 3
  7562. 3
  7563. 3
  7564. 3
  7565. 3
  7566. 3
  7567. 3
  7568. 3
  7569. 3
  7570. 3
  7571. 3
  7572. 3
  7573. 3
  7574. 3
  7575. 3
  7576. 3
  7577. 3
  7578. 3
  7579. 3
  7580. 3
  7581. 3
  7582. 3
  7583. 3
  7584. 3
  7585. 3
  7586. 3
  7587. 3
  7588. 3
  7589. 3
  7590. 3
  7591. 3
  7592. 3
  7593. 3
  7594. 3
  7595. 3
  7596. 3
  7597. 3
  7598. 3
  7599. 3
  7600. 3
  7601. 3
  7602. 3
  7603. 3
  7604. 3
  7605. 3
  7606. 3
  7607. 3
  7608. 3
  7609. 3
  7610. 3
  7611. 3
  7612. 3
  7613. 3
  7614. 3
  7615. 3
  7616. 3
  7617. 3
  7618. 3
  7619. 3
  7620. 3
  7621. 3
  7622. 3
  7623. 3
  7624. 3
  7625. 3
  7626. 3
  7627. 3
  7628. 3
  7629. 3
  7630. 3
  7631. 3
  7632. 3
  7633. 3
  7634. 3
  7635. 3
  7636. 3
  7637. 3
  7638. 3
  7639. 3
  7640. 3
  7641. 3
  7642. 3
  7643. 3
  7644. 3
  7645. 3
  7646. 3
  7647. 3
  7648. 3
  7649. 3
  7650. 3
  7651. 3
  7652. 3
  7653. 3
  7654. 3
  7655. 3
  7656. 3
  7657. 3
  7658. 3
  7659. 3
  7660. 3
  7661. 3
  7662. 3
  7663. 3
  7664. 3
  7665. 3
  7666. 3
  7667. 3
  7668. 3
  7669. 3
  7670. 3
  7671. 3
  7672. 3
  7673. 3
  7674. 3
  7675. 3
  7676. 3
  7677. 3
  7678. 3
  7679. 3
  7680. 3
  7681. 3
  7682. 3
  7683. 3
  7684. 3
  7685. 3
  7686. 3
  7687. 3
  7688. 3
  7689. 3
  7690. 3
  7691. 3
  7692. 3
  7693. 3
  7694. 3
  7695. 3
  7696. 3
  7697. 3
  7698. 3
  7699. 3
  7700. 3
  7701. 3
  7702. 3
  7703. 3
  7704. 3
  7705. 3
  7706. 3
  7707. 3
  7708. 3
  7709. 3
  7710. 3
  7711. 3
  7712. 3
  7713. 3
  7714. 3
  7715. 3
  7716. 3
  7717. 3
  7718. 3
  7719. 3
  7720. 3
  7721. 3
  7722. 3
  7723. 3
  7724. 3
  7725. 3
  7726. 3
  7727. “You know that most cases of FGM are consensual, right? Many people are raised in environments where this practice is normalised, so they don’t see any issue with it. They consent to it.” (Jegamespeed5399) 🤦‍♂️ Don’t be silly son. Do you honestly think 12 year old girls in their right minds are going to willingly consent to having their genitals lopped off? 🤦‍♂️ “Listen, hun, after school today me and your mother are going to take you to have a completely unnecessary medical procedure involving having your clitoris hacked off thereby leading to your being unable to have sexual pleasure ever and leading to the following possible complications:” •severe pain •excessive bleeding (haemorrhage) •genital tissue swelling •fever •infections e.g., tetanus •urinary problems •wound healing problems •injury to surrounding genital tissue •shock •vaginal problems (discharge, itching, bacterial vaginosis and other infections) menstrual problems (painful menstruations, difficulty in passing menstrual blood, etc.) •scar tissue and keloid; •sexual problems (pain during intercourse, decreased satisfaction) •increased risk of childbirth complications (difficult delivery, excessive bleeding, caesarean section, need to resuscitate the baby, etc.) and newborn deaths •need for later surgeries: for example, the sealing or narrowing of the vaginal opening (type 3) may lead to the practice of cutting open the sealed vagina later to allow for sexual intercourse and childbirth (deinfibulation). Sometimes genital tissue is stitched again several times, including after childbirth, hence the woman goes through repeated opening and closing procedures, further increasing both immediate and long-term risks •psychological problems (depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, low self-esteem, etc.). •death. “Now, darling, would you like to consent to this completely unnecessary procedure?” 🤦‍♂️
    3
  7728. There is a direct correlation between countries which belong to the Commonwealth, and therefore have previously been under British rule, and countries that still have homophobic biphobic and/or transphobic legislature in their constitutions. 25% of the world’s population (2.4 billion people) currently live in a country belonging to the Commonwealth, however they make up a disproportionately large 50 per cent of countries that still criminalise homosexuality. There are currently 64 countries (out of 195) in the world that criminalise homosexuality. Of these 64, almost half (29) belong to the Commonwealth. Africa Algeria Cameroon ✅ Chad Comoros Egypt Eritrea Eswatini (Swaziland) ✅ Ethiopia Gambia ✅ Ghana ✅ Guinea Kenya ✅ Liberia Libya Malawi ✅ Mauritania Morocco Nigeria ✅ Senegal Sierra Leone ✅ Somalia South Sudan Sudan Tanzania Togo ✅ Tunisia Uganda ✅ Zambia ✅ Zimbabwe ✅ Asia, including the Middle East Afghanistan Bangladesh ✅ Brunei ✅ Indonesia Iran Iraq Kuwait Lebanon Malaysia ✅ Maldives ✅ Myanmar Oman Pakistan ✅ Palestine Qatar Saudi Arabia Sri Lanka ✅ Syria Turkmenistan United Arab Emirates Uzbekistan Yemen Americas Grenada ✅ Guyana ✅ Jamaica ✅ St Lucia ✅ St Vincent & the Grenadines ✅ Oceania Kiribati ✅ Niue Papua New Guinea ✅ Samoa ✅ Solomon Islands ✅ Tonga ✅ Tuvalu ✅ ✅ Commonwealth member The vast majority of the remaining 64 are majority Islamic. What does this prove? Well, organised religion plays a vital role in the criminalisation of homosexuality. However, the key takeaway for the purposes of this video, is that in Uganda, prior to the widespread introduction of Christianity (Uganda is currently 84% Christian/14% Muslim) homosexuality was largely tolerated and not legislated for within the various tribal denominations. At worst, in most cases, it was merely ignored. Yet here we have Museveni telling the ‘evil West’ to butt-out, when the criminalisation of homosexuality was brought in directly on the back of a Bible (…and a Quran!) by a bunch of Westerners! Hypocrisy? 🤦‍♂️
    3
  7729. 3
  7730. 3
  7731. 3
  7732. ⁠​​⁠​​⁠​​⁠​​⁠Why should anyone be taking lessons in anything (let alone telling consenting f*cking adults what they can and cannot do and with whom in the bedroom!🤦‍♂️) from a corrupt, tin-pot dictator presiding over a corrupt, tin-pot poverty-blasted country? There is a reason why great waves of African migrants seek a better life elsewhere. They are leaving a continent which has, historically, not pulled its weight (and continues to not pull its weight) on the world stage to go to other more enlightened, more prosperous, freer places. A good indicator of this situation is if we take a look at all the key inventions/discoveries humanity has attained, virtually none of them are out of Africa. See? Not pulling and continuing to not pull its weight. ​​⁠1. The wheel. (Sumerians) 2. Printing press. (Gutenberg - German) 3. Penicillin. (Fleming - Scottish) 4. Compass. (Chinese) 5. Light bulb. (Edison - American) 6. Telephone. (Graham Bell - Scottish) 7. Television. (Logie Baird - Scottish) 8. Internal combustion engine. (Étienne Lenoir - French) 9. The pill. (Pincus/Rock - American) 10. Internet. (Berners-Lee - English) 11. Concrete. (Nabataeans) 12. Telescope. (Lippershey - Dutch) 13. Batteries. (Volta - Italian) 14. Aeroplane. (Wright brothers - American) 15. Fridge. (Wolf - American) 16. Nuclear energy. (Fermi - Italian) 17. Vaccines. (Jenner - English) 18. X-rays. (Röntgen - German) 19. Cars. (Benz - German) 20. Radio. (Marconi - Italian) 21. Anaesthetics. (Morton - American) 22. Genetics. (Mendel - Austrian) 23. Computer. (Babbage - English) 24. Paper. (Ts'ai Lun - Chinese) 25. Steam engine. (Watt - Scottish) 26. Electricity. (Benjamin Franklin - American) 27. Steel. (Henry Bessemer - English) 28. Hindu-Arabic numeral system. (India) 29. Remote communication. (Samuel Morse - American) 30. Pasteurisation. (Louis Pasteur - French) 31. The scientific method. (Francis Bacon - English) 32. Flush toilet. (John Harrington - English) 33. Sailboat. (Mesopotamia) 34. Calculus. (Issac Newton - English/Gottfried Leibniz - German) 35. Copernican theory. (Nicolaus Copernicus - Polish) 36. Gravity. (Isaac Newton - English) 37. Theory of evolution. (Charles Darwin - English) 38. Double-entry accounting. (Luca Pacioli - Italian) 39. Mirror. (Justus von Liebig - German) 40. Electric motor. (Thomas Davenport - American) 41. GPS. (Bradford Parkinson - American) 42. DNA double-helix. (Franklin/Crick/Watson - American/English) 43. Prozac. (Klaus Schmiegel - German) 44. Industrial robot. (George Devol - American) 45. LED (Nick Holonyak - American) 46. Drones. (Abraham Karem - Iraq) 47. Digital music. (James Russell - American) 48. MRI. (Raymond Damadian - American) 49. Genetic sequencing. (Fredrick Sanger - English) 50. Rubber. (Charles Goodyear - American)
    3
  7733. 3
  7734. 3
  7735. 3
  7736. 3
  7737. 3
  7738. 3
  7739. 3
  7740. 3
  7741. 3
  7742. 3
  7743. 3
  7744. 3
  7745. 3
  7746. 3
  7747. 3
  7748. 3
  7749. 3
  7750. 3
  7751. 3
  7752. 3
  7753. 3
  7754. 3
  7755. 3
  7756. 3
  7757. 3
  7758. 3
  7759. 3
  7760. 3
  7761. 3
  7762. 3
  7763. 3
  7764. 3
  7765. 3
  7766. 3
  7767. 3
  7768. 3
  7769. 3
  7770. 3
  7771. 3
  7772. The Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Act (2023) prescribes up to twenty years in prison for ‘promotion of homosexuality’, life imprisonment for ‘homosexual acts’, and the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’. 1. How, exactly, can you ‘promote’ homosexuality? This isn’t about trying to persuade people to become gay, as if you are trying to persuade people to vote for you, or persuade people to buy a new whizz-bang, fancy-pants vibrator (ijumpjudy has just put in her order - extra batteries included 😉); that’s impossible. It’s not like you can ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. So, primitively prescribing 20 years imprisonment for something you either are or aren’t no matter how much ‘promoting’ is done is bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ 2. There are no such things as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’. If this term refers to anal/oral sex, then, spoiler alert: millions of heterosexuals engage in these acts, too, so to describe them as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’ makes zero sense. Even if we accept that giving/receiving a BJ or having anal sex is a ‘homosexual act’, you’re really going to imprison someone for life for this? 🤦‍♂️ 3. ‘Aggravated homosexuality’ has the death penalty as its punishment and is described as an offence including ‘serial offenders, same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality.’ Ok, let’s break this down: •‘serial offenders’ - presumably this means people who just have consenting sex on many occasions. Death for this? 🤦‍♂️ •‘same-sex rape’ - as with heterosexual rape, this should obviously be criminalised, but I wouldn’t support death for it. •‘sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation’ - in the case of a position of authority, if the other person consents to the sex, I see no issue with it. If intimidation is involved and no consent given, then this should be criminalised. •‘sex with persons older than 75’ - lol. I see absolutely no reason to criminalise someone for having sex with anyone who is above the age of consent. If that person is 75, 85 or 105, and they consent to the sex, then to institute the death penalty for this is hilariously irrational. 🤦‍♂️ •‘sex with the disabled and mentally ill’ - lol. If a disabled gay man or woman wants to have sex, where’s the fucking issue? 🤷‍♂️ Death for this? Yer having a fucking larff, aincha? 🤦‍♂️ Obviously, the mentally ill could be compromised when it comes to consent, so this needs sensitivity. •‘homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality’ - so, if someone has been convicted just once for, say, giving a BJ (which isn’t actually a ‘homosexual act’, as we’ve established there is no such thing) to his partner, and he’s caught doing it again, you kill him? Really? 🤦‍♂️ When you look closely at the Bill, it becomes increasingly ridiculous and barely believable that in 2024 we are criminalising people for simply having consensual adult sex. 🤦‍♂️
    3
  7773. 3
  7774. 3
  7775. 3
  7776. 3
  7777. 3
  7778. 3
  7779. 3
  7780. 3
  7781. 3
  7782. 3
  7783. 3
  7784. 3
  7785. 3
  7786. 3
  7787. 3
  7788. 3
  7789. 3
  7790. 3
  7791. 3
  7792. 3
  7793. 3
  7794. 3
  7795. 3
  7796. 3
  7797. 3
  7798. 3
  7799. 3
  7800. 3
  7801. 3
  7802. 3
  7803. 3
  7804. ⁠​​⁠​​⁠​​⁠​​⁠Why should anyone be taking lessons in anything from a corrupt, tin-pot dictator presiding over a corrupt, tin-pot poverty-blasted country? There is a reason why great waves of African migrants seek a better life elsewhere. They are leaving a continent which has, historically, not pulled its weight (and continues to not pull its weight) on the world stage to go to other more enlightened, more prosperous, freer places. A good indicator of this situation is if we take a look at all the key inventions/discoveries humanity has attained, virtually none of them are out of Africa. See? Not pulling and continuing to not pull its weight. ​​⁠1. The wheel. (Sumerians) 2. Printing press. (Gutenberg - German) 3. Penicillin. (Fleming - Scottish) 4. Compass. (Chinese) 5. Light bulb. (Edison - American) 6. Telephone. (Graham Bell - Scottish) 7. Television. (Logie Baird - Scottish) 8. Internal combustion engine. (Étienne Lenoir - French) 9. The pill. (Pincus/Rock - American) 10. Internet. (Berners-Lee - English) 11. Concrete. (Nabataeans) 12. Telescope. (Lippershey - Dutch) 13. Batteries. (Volta - Italian) 14. Aeroplane. (Wright brothers - American) 15. Fridge. (Wolf - American) 16. Nuclear energy. (Fermi - Italian) 17. Vaccines. (Jenner - English) 18. X-rays. (Röntgen - German) 19. Cars. (Benz - German) 20. Radio. (Marconi - Italian) 21. Anaesthetics. (Morton - American) 22. Genetics. (Mendel - Austrian) 23. Computer. (Babbage - English) 24. Paper. (Ts'ai Lun - Chinese) 25. Steam engine. (Watt - Scottish) 26. Electricity. (Benjamin Franklin - American) 27. Steel. (Henry Bessemer - English) 28. Hindu-Arabic numeral system. (India) 29. Remote communication. (Samuel Morse - American) 30. Pasteurisation. (Louis Pasteur - French) 31. The scientific method. (Francis Bacon - English) 32. Flush toilet. (John Harrington - English) 33. Sailboat. (Mesopotamia) 34. Calculus. (Issac Newton - English/Gottfried Leibniz - German) 35. Copernican theory. (Nicolaus Copernicus - Polish) 36. Gravity. (Isaac Newton - English) 37. Theory of evolution. (Charles Darwin - English) 38. Double-entry accounting. (Luca Pacioli - Italian) 39. Mirror. (Justus von Liebig - German) 40. Electric motor. (Thomas Davenport - American) 41. GPS. (Bradford Parkinson - American) 42. DNA double-helix. (Franklin/Crick/Watson - American/English) 43. Prozac. (Klaus Schmiegel - German) 44. Industrial robot. (George Devol - American) 45. LED (Nick Holonyak - American) 46. Drones. (Abraham Karem - Iraq) 47. Digital music. (James Russell - American) 48. MRI. (Raymond Damadian - American) 49. Genetic sequencing. (Fredrick Sanger - English) 50. Rubber. (Charles Goodyear - American)
    3
  7805. 3
  7806. 3
  7807. 3
  7808. 3
  7809. 3
  7810. 3
  7811. 3
  7812. 3
  7813. 3
  7814. 3
  7815. 3
  7816. 3
  7817. 3
  7818. 3
  7819. 3
  7820. 3
  7821. 3
  7822. 3
  7823. 3
  7824. 3
  7825. 3
  7826. 3
  7827. 3
  7828. 3
  7829. 3
  7830. 3
  7831. 3
  7832. 3
  7833. 3
  7834. 3
  7835. 3
  7836. 3
  7837. 3
  7838. 3
  7839. 3
  7840. 3
  7841. 3
  7842. 3
  7843. 3
  7844. 3
  7845. 3
  7846. 3
  7847. 3
  7848. 3
  7849. 3
  7850. 3
  7851. 3
  7852. 3
  7853. 3
  7854. 3
  7855. 3
  7856. 3
  7857. 3
  7858. 3
  7859. 3
  7860. 3
  7861. 3
  7862. 3
  7863. 3
  7864. 3
  7865. 3
  7866. 3
  7867. 3
  7868. 3
  7869. 3
  7870. 3
  7871. 3
  7872. 3
  7873. 3
  7874. 3
  7875. 3
  7876. 3
  7877. 3
  7878. 3
  7879. 3
  7880. 3
  7881. 3
  7882. 3
  7883. 3
  7884. 3
  7885. 3
  7886. 3
  7887. 3
  7888. 3
  7889. 3
  7890. 3
  7891. 3
  7892. 3
  7893. 3
  7894. 3
  7895. 3
  7896. 3
  7897. 3
  7898. 3
  7899. 3
  7900. 3
  7901. 3
  7902. 3
  7903. 3
  7904. 3
  7905. 3
  7906. 3
  7907. 3
  7908. 3
  7909. 3
  7910. 3
  7911. 3
  7912. 3
  7913. 3
  7914. 3
  7915. 3
  7916. 3
  7917. 3
  7918. 3
  7919. 3
  7920. 3
  7921. 3
  7922. 3
  7923. 3
  7924. 3
  7925. 3
  7926. 3
  7927. 3
  7928. 3
  7929. 3
  7930. 3
  7931. 3
  7932. 3
  7933. 3
  7934. 3
  7935. 3
  7936. 3
  7937. 3
  7938. 3
  7939. 3
  7940. 3
  7941. 3
  7942. 3
  7943. 3
  7944. 3
  7945. 3
  7946. 3
  7947. 3
  7948. 3
  7949. 3
  7950. 3
  7951. 3
  7952. 3
  7953. 3
  7954. 3
  7955. 3
  7956. 3
  7957. 3
  7958. 3
  7959. 3
  7960. 3
  7961. 3
  7962. 3
  7963. 3
  7964. 3
  7965. 3
  7966. 3
  7967. 3
  7968. 3
  7969. 3
  7970. 3
  7971. 3
  7972. 3
  7973. 3
  7974. 3
  7975. 3
  7976. 3
  7977. 3
  7978. 3
  7979. 3
  7980. 3
  7981. 3
  7982. 3
  7983. 3
  7984. 3
  7985. 3
  7986. 3
  7987. 3
  7988. 3
  7989. 3
  7990. 3
  7991. 3
  7992. 3
  7993. 3
  7994. 3
  7995. 3
  7996. 3
  7997. 3
  7998. 3
  7999. 3
  8000. 3
  8001. 3
  8002. 3
  8003. 3
  8004. 3
  8005. 3
  8006. 3
  8007. 3
  8008. 3
  8009. 3
  8010. 3
  8011. 3
  8012. 3
  8013. 3
  8014. 3
  8015. 3
  8016. 3
  8017. 3
  8018. 3
  8019. 3
  8020. 3
  8021. 3
  8022. 3
  8023. 3
  8024. 3
  8025. 3
  8026. 3
  8027. 3
  8028. 3
  8029. 3
  8030. 3
  8031. 3
  8032. 3
  8033. 3
  8034. 3
  8035. 3
  8036. 3
  8037. 3
  8038. 3
  8039. 3
  8040. 3
  8041. 3
  8042. 3
  8043. 3
  8044. 3
  8045. 3
  8046. 3
  8047. 3
  8048. 3
  8049. 3
  8050. 3
  8051. 3
  8052. 3
  8053. 3
  8054. 3
  8055. 3
  8056. 3
  8057. 3
  8058. 3
  8059. 3
  8060. Peace talks in a fantasy world Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Ok, we want Russia to de-nuclearise and committed to not militarising the Russia/Ukraine border.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “We want Russia disarmed to ensure no threat to Ukraine (or anyone else)” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want protection for the Ukrainian language in eastern Ukraine.” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want Russia to emerge from communist dictatorship and come into the light of free, liberal democracies.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “We want Moscow and St Petersburg to be recognised as free Ukrainian cities.” Peace talks in the real world Putin: Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “Done.” Moral of story: Sometimes bullies just get a little of what they want, but never mess with someone by pitching up at their home expecting to take it forcibly, for as Dustin Hoffman going apeshit in Strawdogs has shown: you are unlikely to win.
    3
  8061. 3
  8062. 3
  8063. 3
  8064. 3
  8065. 3
  8066. 3
  8067. 3
  8068. 3
  8069. 3
  8070. 3
  8071. 3
  8072. 3
  8073. 3
  8074. 3
  8075. 3
  8076. 3
  8077. 3
  8078. 3
  8079. 3
  8080. 3
  8081. 3
  8082. 3
  8083. 3
  8084. 3
  8085. 3
  8086. 3
  8087. 3
  8088. 3
  8089. 3
  8090. 3
  8091. 3
  8092. 3
  8093. 3
  8094. 3
  8095. 3
  8096. 3
  8097. 3
  8098. 3
  8099. 3
  8100. 3
  8101. 3
  8102. 3
  8103. 3
  8104. 3
  8105. 3
  8106. 3
  8107. 3
  8108. 3
  8109. 3
  8110. 3
  8111. 3
  8112. 3
  8113. 3
  8114. 3
  8115. 3
  8116. 3
  8117. 3
  8118. 3
  8119. 3
  8120. 3
  8121. 3
  8122. 3
  8123. 3
  8124. 3
  8125. 3
  8126. 3
  8127. 3
  8128. 3
  8129. 3
  8130. 3
  8131. 3
  8132. 3
  8133. 3
  8134. 3
  8135. 3
  8136. 3
  8137. 3
  8138. 3
  8139. 3
  8140. 3
  8141. 3
  8142. 3
  8143. 3
  8144. 3
  8145. 3
  8146. 3
  8147. 3
  8148. 3
  8149. 3
  8150. 3
  8151. 3
  8152. 3
  8153. 3
  8154. 3
  8155. 3
  8156. 3
  8157. 3
  8158. 3
  8159. 3
  8160. 3
  8161. 3
  8162. 3
  8163. 3
  8164. 3
  8165. 3
  8166. 3
  8167. 3
  8168. 3
  8169. 3
  8170. 3
  8171. 3
  8172. 3
  8173. 3
  8174. 3
  8175. 3
  8176. 3
  8177. 3
  8178. 3
  8179. 3
  8180. 3
  8181. 3
  8182. 3
  8183. 3
  8184. 3
  8185. 3
  8186. 3
  8187. 3
  8188. 3
  8189. 3
  8190. 3
  8191. 3
  8192. 3
  8193. 3
  8194. 3
  8195. 3
  8196. 3
  8197. 3
  8198. 3
  8199. 3
  8200. 3
  8201. 3
  8202. 3
  8203. 3
  8204. 3
  8205. 3
  8206. 3
  8207. 3
  8208. 3
  8209. 3
  8210. 3
  8211. 3
  8212. 3
  8213. 3
  8214. 3
  8215. 3
  8216. 3
  8217. 3
  8218. 3
  8219. 3
  8220. 3
  8221. 3
  8222. 3
  8223. 3
  8224. 3
  8225. 3
  8226. 3
  8227. 3
  8228. 3
  8229. 3
  8230. 3
  8231. 3
  8232. 3
  8233. 3
  8234. 3
  8235. 3
  8236. 3
  8237. 3
  8238. 3
  8239. 3
  8240. 3
  8241. 3
  8242. 3
  8243. 3
  8244. 3
  8245. 3
  8246. 3
  8247. 3
  8248. 3
  8249. 3
  8250. 3
  8251. 3
  8252. 3
  8253. 3
  8254. 3
  8255. 3
  8256. 3
  8257. 3
  8258. 3
  8259. 3
  8260. 3
  8261. 3
  8262. 3
  8263. 3
  8264. 3
  8265. 3
  8266. 3
  8267. 3
  8268. 3
  8269. 3
  8270. 3
  8271. 3
  8272. 3
  8273. 3
  8274. 3
  8275. 3
  8276. 3
  8277. 3
  8278. 3
  8279. 3
  8280. 3
  8281. 3
  8282. 3
  8283. 3
  8284. 3
  8285. 3
  8286. 3
  8287. 3
  8288. 3
  8289. 3
  8290. 3
  8291. 3
  8292. 3
  8293. 3
  8294. 3
  8295. 3
  8296. 3
  8297. 3
  8298. 3
  8299. 3
  8300. 3
  8301. 3
  8302. 3
  8303. 3
  8304. 3
  8305. 3
  8306. 3
  8307. 3
  8308. 3
  8309. 3
  8310. 3
  8311. 3
  8312. 3
  8313. 3
  8314. 3
  8315. 3
  8316. 3
  8317. 3
  8318. 3
  8319. 3
  8320. 3
  8321. 3
  8322. 3
  8323. 3
  8324. 3
  8325. 3
  8326. 3
  8327. 3
  8328. 3
  8329. 3
  8330. 3
  8331. 3
  8332. 3
  8333. 3
  8334. 3
  8335. 3
  8336. 3
  8337. 3
  8338. 3
  8339. 3
  8340. 3
  8341. 3
  8342. 3
  8343. 3
  8344. 3
  8345. 3
  8346. 3
  8347. 3
  8348. 3
  8349. 3
  8350. 3
  8351. 3
  8352. 3
  8353. 3
  8354. 3
  8355. 3
  8356. 3
  8357. 3
  8358. 3
  8359. 3
  8360. 3
  8361. 3
  8362. 3
  8363. 3
  8364. 3
  8365. 3
  8366. 3
  8367. 3
  8368. 3
  8369. 3
  8370. 3
  8371. 3
  8372. 3
  8373. 3
  8374. 3
  8375. 3
  8376. 3
  8377. 3
  8378. 3
  8379. 3
  8380. 3
  8381. 3
  8382. 3
  8383. 3
  8384. 3
  8385. 3
  8386. 3
  8387. 3
  8388. 3
  8389. 3
  8390. 3
  8391. 3
  8392. 3
  8393. 3
  8394. 3
  8395. 3
  8396. 3
  8397. 3
  8398. 3
  8399. 3
  8400. 3
  8401. 3
  8402. 3
  8403. 3
  8404. 3
  8405. 3
  8406. 3
  8407. 3
  8408. 3
  8409. 3
  8410. 3
  8411. 3
  8412. 3
  8413. 3
  8414. 3
  8415. 3
  8416. 3
  8417. 3
  8418. 3
  8419. 3
  8420. 3
  8421. 3
  8422. 3
  8423. 3
  8424. 3
  8425. 3
  8426. 3
  8427. 3
  8428. 3
  8429. 3
  8430. 3
  8431. 3
  8432. 3
  8433. 3
  8434. 3
  8435. 3
  8436. 3
  8437. 3
  8438. 3
  8439. 3
  8440. 3
  8441. 3
  8442. 3
  8443. 3
  8444. 3
  8445. 3
  8446. 3
  8447. 3
  8448. 3
  8449. 3
  8450. 3
  8451. 3
  8452. 3
  8453. 3
  8454. 3
  8455. 3
  8456. 3
  8457. 3
  8458. 3
  8459. 3
  8460. 3
  8461. 3
  8462. 3
  8463. 3
  8464. 3
  8465. 3
  8466. 3
  8467. 3
  8468. 3
  8469. 3
  8470. 3
  8471. @5:00 This guy is just falling into the trap of ‘things were much better in my day’. I’m not much younger than him and I’m here to tell him they weren’t, in case he’s forgotten. On balance, I consider the Internet and the democratisation of opinion thereby, has been a boon for humanity. The main drawback for me is the drastic deterioration in individual/collective attention spans as users all look to be distracted by the next ‘hit’. However egregious this fact is for me, it is far outweighed by the way the Internet has opened up all opinion to virtually everyone on the planet, including those in countries mired in acute poverty where a cellphone is often atop each person’s ‘hierarchy of needs’, as it is in affluent areas. This man, while I respect his opinion, is completely ignoring the multifarious positives of an Internet-world in favour of, dare I say, not moving with the times. After all, there were similar misgivings about how books would ‘corrupt’ when they became available to a mass readership, and similarly with television, where some commentators presaged the collapse of civilisation as we know it when that came along. It was ever thus, for back in the day even Socrates was looking askance at the youth of his day as they, as he saw it, indulged in idle chatter (for ‘idle chatter’ read ‘Internet chat’) and displayed bad manners and disrespect for elders (for ‘bad manners’ and ‘disrespect’ read constant phone use to the neglect of much else). Surely, each of us should summon the moral confidence of Socrates as he wandered around the market and simply declared: ‘how much I can live without’. In other words, this man has looked at the market of 2022 and, like Socrates, has decided to spurn some of its enticements, but he really has no right to deny these to others or to more than suggest that just because the Internet and cellphones do nothing for him, this does not mean that other people don’t find them useful and beneficial. My feeling is that he just resents not being able to attune to the signs of his times, and he comes across as a man out of his era, and therefore appears curmudgeonly and faintly ridiculous. 💻
    3
  8472. 3
  8473. 3
  8474. 3
  8475. 3
  8476. 3
  8477. 3
  8478. 3
  8479. 3
  8480. 3
  8481. 3
  8482. 3
  8483. 3
  8484. 3
  8485. 3
  8486. 3
  8487. 3
  8488. 3
  8489. 3
  8490. 3
  8491. 3
  8492. 3
  8493. 3
  8494. 3
  8495. 3
  8496. 3
  8497. 3
  8498. 3
  8499. 3
  8500. 3
  8501. 3
  8502. 3
  8503. US invades China 1945-46 - OK US invades Korea 1950-53 - OK US invades China (again) 1950-53 - OK US invades Guatemala 1954 - OK US invades Indonesia 1958 - OK US invades Cuba 1959-60 - OK US invades Guatemala 1960 - OK US invades Belgian Congo 1964 - OK US invades Guatemala (again) 1964 - OK US invades Dominican Republic 1965-66 - OK US invades Peru 1965 - OK US invades Laos 1964-73 - OK US invades Vietnam 1961-73 - OK US invades Cambodia 1969-70 - OK US invades Guatemala (yet again) 1967-69 - OK US invades Lebanon 1982-84 - OK US invades Grenada 1983-84 - OK US invades Libya 1986 - OK US invades El Salvador 1981-92 - OK US invades Nicaragua 1981-90 - OK US invades Iran 1987-88 - OK US invades Libya (again) 1989 - OK US invades Panama 1989-90 - OK US invades Iraq 1991 - OK US invades Kuwait 1991 - OK US invades Somalia 1992-94 - OK US invades Bosnia 1995 - OK US invades Iran 1998 - OK US invades Sudan 1998 - OK US invades Afghanistan 1998 - OK US invades Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999 - OK US invades Afghanistan (again) 2001 - OK US invades Libya (yet again) 2011 - OK US invades Iraq (again) and Syria 2014 – OK US invades Somalia 2011 – OK US invades Iran 2020 – OK Russia invades Ukraine 2022 - not OK I don’t condone Putin’s actions in Ukraine one iota. However, he is doing precisely nothing America and her partners haven’t been doing for decades. It constantly bemuses me how the west completely and utterly ignores the buckets of foreign blood they have spilt, while pointing the finger at the likes of Putin. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
    3
  8504. 3
  8505. 3
  8506. 3
  8507. 3
  8508. 3
  8509. 3
  8510. 3
  8511. 3
  8512. 3
  8513. 3
  8514. 3
  8515. 3
  8516. 3
  8517. 3
  8518. 3
  8519. 3
  8520. 3
  8521. 3
  8522. 3
  8523. 3
  8524.  @TRUEBIOLOGYMATTERS  Frankly, I can’t quite believe you are operating under the theory that the Earth is flat. I work with science in these matters and the overwhelming credible scientific evidence points to a spinning ellipsoid Earth. 1. Watch a ship sail off to sea Without being in the sky, it is impossible to see the curvature of the Earth. However, you can always see a demonstration of this if you visit a harbour or any place with a wide-open view of the water. If you are able to watch a ship sail off to sea, watch its mast and flag as it fades off into the distance. You will notice that, in fact, it does not "fade off into the distance" at all; instead, you will see its mast and flag appear to slowly sink. The ship sailed beyond the point at which you would see it. Just to be sure, bring a pair of binoculars with you so that you can see even farther off into the distance. It's as if you're watching it go over to the other side of a hill. This phenomenon can only be explained by a sphere-shaped planet. 2. Watch a lunar eclipse Solar eclipses get all the attention, but if you are able to catch a glimpse of a lunar eclipse, you can see evidence that the Earth is, indeed, round. Here's how it works: Earth passes between the moon and sun, so that the sun projects Earth’s shadow onto the Moon in the night sky. You've probably seen a partial lunar eclipse without even noticing it; if the moon looks orange, that's a sign of a lunar eclipse. If you've ever seen a total lunar eclipse, you probably noticed that the shadow did not look like this. A round shadow crossed over a round object. This does not sound like a thing that would happen if we were on a plane with all of the celestial bodies simply hovering overhead—or, perhaps more asinine, if the sun were orbiting Earth and not vice versa. 3. Climb a tree Imagine a vast plane with but one tree smack in the middle. If the earth were flat, your vision would extend exactly as far while standing at the base of the tree as it would when at the top of the tree. However, the farther you climb, the farther your line of sight will extend to the horizon. That's because parts of Earth that were concealed from view by its curvature are now revealed because your position has changed. Back to the vast plane. The naked eye can see objects that are millions of miles away in space. Theoretically, with a clear line of sight on a clear night, one would also be able to see bright lights from far-away cities. That this is not possible is further evidence of a round, not flat, Earth 4. Travel through, or even within, different time zones According to a 2008 paper in Applied Optics by David K. Lynch, the curvature of the earth becomes somewhat visible at an elevation of 35,000 feet (with a >60° field of view) and more easily visible at an elevation of 50,000 feet. So if you're on the right commercial flight, you might be able to see the curvature of the earth with your own two eyes. In the event that you're not high enough, though, you can still experience the curvature of the earth another way. For example, if you were to fly all the way around the world, you'd find that it would be nighttime in part of the world and daytime in another part. In that way, the existence of time zones itself is proof that the Earth is round. Taken another way, you wouldn't even need to travel through different time zones. Time zones are wide enough that you will see the sun rising and/or setting later in the western part of a time zone than in the eastern part. According to the Farmers' Almanac, the sun will rise and set roughly four minutes later for every 70 miles you drive from east to west. If you wanted to combine this experiment with the previous one, you could note how much more of Earth you can see when you begin your ascent into the air than you can while you are sitting on the tarmac waiting to take off. 5. Watch a sunset Pick a nice spot from which you can watch a sunset (we'll call this point A). Ideally, you'd have a clear horizon in front of you, and behind you would be some sort of elevated point that you can quickly access (a hill, a building with at least two floors, or perhaps the aforementioned tree; we'll call this point B). Watch the sunset from point A, and once the sun is out of sight, hurry on over to point B. With the added elevation provided by point B, you should be able to see the sun above the horizon. If Earth were flat, the sun would not be visible at any elevation once it had set. Because Earth is round, the sun will come back into your line of sight. If you don't have a hill, you could even try lying on your stomach to watch the sunset and then standing up to get a higher line of sight. 6. Measure shadows across the country Pick two locations that are some distance apart (at least a couple hundred miles from each other and on the same meridian). Grab two sticks or dowels (or other objects) of equal length, two tape measures, and a friend. Each of you will take one stick/dowel/object and one tape measure to your location, stick the object into the ground, and measure the shadow. (For accuracy, you should both take your measurements at the same time of day.) On a flat Earth, the shadow that is cast by each would be of the same length. However, if you and your friend compare notes, you'll find that one shadow was longer than the other. That's because, due to the curvature of Earth, the sun will hit one part of Earth at one angle and another part of Earth at a different angle even at the same time of day. This experiment has been around since about 240 B.C., when Greek mathematician Eratosthenes compared the shadows cast in both Syene—now Aswan, Egypt—and Alexandria on the summer solstice. Eratosthenes had learned of a well in Syene where once a year on the summer solstice, the sun would illuminate the entire bottom of the well and tall buildings and other objects would not cast a shadow. However, he noticed that shadows were being cast on the summer solstice in Alexandria, so he measured the angle of the shadow and found it to be an angle of about 7.2°. 7. Google "International Space Station photos" Seriously, just look at some of the amazing photos you’ll find. There appears to be quite the curvature there. Now if you’d like to provide evidence to back your flat-Earth theory, I’d be grateful.
    3
  8525. 3
  8526. 3
  8527. 3
  8528. 3
  8529. 3
  8530. 3
  8531. 3
  8532. 3
  8533. 3
  8534. 3
  8535. 3
  8536.  @EvsEntps  You may poke fun at the Irish Republicans for being so anti-English but to be fair, as far as I can see, the Irish have rather a lot to be angry about with the English historically. First they endured the Scottish Plantations over 100 years which involved the confiscation of Irish-owned land by the English Crown and the colonisation of land by British (mainly Scottish) Protestant settlers into a Catholic territory. Unsurprisingly, the Irish fought back. Two Desmond Rebellions (1569-73;1579-83) to fight against the extension of English governance over the province. Battle of Clontibret (1595) fought against the British. Ditto Battle of the Yellow Ford (1598). The Nine Years’ War (1593-1603) fought English rule in Ireland. The 1641 Rebellion occurred when Irish Catholics were being threatened by the expansion of the anti-Catholic English Parliament and Scottish Planters and they rebelled against English and Protestant domination. The 1798 Irish Rebellion was a major uprising against British rule in Ireland. The Irish wanted an end to anti-Catholic discrimination, greater Irish self-governance and to roll back the Plantations. The 1803 Rebellion of Irish Republicans was against, you’ve guessed it, British rule in Ireland. I think you can spot a theme here. The famous 1916 Easter Rising had the aim of establishing an independent Irish Republic, with the hope of finally ending British colonial rule. And so on, right up to the 1960s when the Civil Rights movement challenged the inequalities and discrimination against ethnic Irish Catholics perpetrated by the Ulster Protestant community. So, with this snapshot of Irish history, I return to my OP that began this whole thread: if the British had kept their nose out of other people’s business, then none of this would have obtained.
    3
  8537. 3
  8538. 3
  8539. 3
  8540. 3
  8541. 3
  8542. 3
  8543. 3
  8544. 3
  8545. 3
  8546. 3
  8547. 3
  8548. 3
  8549. 3
  8550. 3
  8551. 3
  8552. 3
  8553. 3
  8554. 3
  8555. 3
  8556. 3
  8557. 3
  8558. 3
  8559. 3
  8560. 3
  8561. 3
  8562. 3
  8563. 3
  8564. 3
  8565. 3
  8566. 3
  8567. 3
  8568. 3
  8569. 3
  8570. 3
  8571. 3
  8572. 3
  8573. 3
  8574. 3
  8575. 3
  8576. 3
  8577. 3
  8578. 3
  8579. 3
  8580. 3
  8581. 3
  8582. 3
  8583. 3
  8584. 3
  8585. 3
  8586. 3
  8587. 3
  8588. 3
  8589. 3
  8590. 3
  8591. 3
  8592. 3
  8593. 3
  8594. 3
  8595. 3
  8596. 3
  8597. 3
  8598. 3
  8599. 3
  8600. 3
  8601. 3
  8602. 3
  8603. 3
  8604. 3
  8605. 3
  8606. 3
  8607. 3
  8608. 3
  8609. 3
  8610. 3
  8611. 3
  8612. 3
  8613. 3
  8614. 3
  8615. 3
  8616. 3
  8617. 3
  8618. 3
  8619. 3
  8620. 3
  8621. 3
  8622. 3
  8623. 3
  8624. 3
  8625. 3
  8626. 3
  8627. 3
  8628. 3
  8629. 3
  8630. 3
  8631. 3
  8632. 3
  8633. 3
  8634. 3
  8635. 3
  8636. 3
  8637. 3
  8638. 3
  8639. 3
  8640. 3
  8641. 3
  8642. 3
  8643. 3
  8644. 3
  8645. 3
  8646. 3
  8647. 3
  8648. 3
  8649. 3
  8650. 3
  8651. 3
  8652. 3
  8653. 3
  8654. 3
  8655. 3
  8656. 3
  8657. 3
  8658. 3
  8659. 3
  8660. 3
  8661. 3
  8662. 3
  8663. 3
  8664. 3
  8665. 3
  8666. 3
  8667. 3
  8668. 3
  8669. 3
  8670. 3
  8671. 3
  8672. 3
  8673. 3
  8674. 3
  8675. 3
  8676. 3
  8677. 3
  8678. 3
  8679. 3
  8680. 3
  8681. 3
  8682. 3
  8683. 3
  8684. 3
  8685. 3
  8686. 3
  8687. 3
  8688. 3
  8689. 3
  8690. 3
  8691. 3
  8692. 3
  8693. 3
  8694. 3
  8695. 3
  8696. 3
  8697. 3
  8698. 3
  8699. 3
  8700. 3
  8701. 3
  8702. 3
  8703. 3
  8704. 3
  8705. 3
  8706. 3
  8707. 3
  8708. 3
  8709. 3
  8710. 3
  8711. 3
  8712. 3
  8713. 3
  8714. 3
  8715. 3
  8716. 3
  8717. 3
  8718. 3
  8719. 3
  8720. 3
  8721. 3
  8722. 3
  8723. 3
  8724. 3
  8725. 3
  8726. 3
  8727. 3
  8728. 3
  8729. 3
  8730. 3
  8731. 3
  8732. 3
  8733. 3
  8734. 3
  8735. 3
  8736. 3
  8737. 3
  8738. 3
  8739. 3
  8740. 3
  8741. 3
  8742. 3
  8743. 3
  8744. 3
  8745. 3
  8746. 3
  8747. 3
  8748. 3
  8749. 3
  8750. 3
  8751. 3
  8752. 3
  8753. 3
  8754. 3
  8755. 3
  8756. 3
  8757. 3
  8758. 3
  8759. 3
  8760. 3
  8761. 3
  8762. 3
  8763. 3
  8764. 3
  8765. 3
  8766. 3
  8767. 3
  8768. 3
  8769. 3
  8770. 3
  8771. 3
  8772. 3
  8773. 3
  8774. 3
  8775. 3
  8776. 3
  8777. 3
  8778. 3
  8779. 3
  8780. 3
  8781. 3
  8782. 3
  8783. 3
  8784. 3
  8785. 3
  8786. 3
  8787. 3
  8788. 3
  8789. 3
  8790. 3
  8791. 3
  8792. 3
  8793. 3
  8794. 3
  8795. 3
  8796. 3
  8797. 3
  8798. 3
  8799. 3
  8800. 3
  8801. 3
  8802. 3
  8803. 3
  8804. 3
  8805. 3
  8806. 3
  8807. 3
  8808. 3
  8809. 3
  8810. 3
  8811. 3
  8812. 3
  8813. 3
  8814. 3
  8815. 3
  8816. 3
  8817. 3
  8818. 3
  8819. 3
  8820. 3
  8821. 3
  8822. 3
  8823. 3
  8824. 3
  8825. 3
  8826. 3
  8827. 3
  8828. 3
  8829. 3
  8830. 3
  8831. 3
  8832. 3
  8833. 3
  8834. 3
  8835. 3
  8836. 3
  8837. 3
  8838. 3
  8839. 3
  8840. 3
  8841. 3
  8842. 3
  8843. A big part of the uproar here, aside from half-naked men in stripper heels swinging around provocatively on ropes in a school classroom in front of pre-teens, is what is said surrounding ‘gender ideology’ when drags take the class. It’s clearly agenda-based. Can we just get this straight (pun intended) once and for all? Humans cannot change biological sex, which is determined at fertilization (genotype) and during embryonic development (phenotype). People may change many features of their lives, such as their interests, hobbies, diet, friends or careers. However, some facts are unalterable. A person’s genetic inheritance, their biological sex, (not culturally-determined gender), is an immutable characteristic. No amount of ‘gender-reassignment’ can alter the fact that if you were born with XY sex chromosomes, you will die with XY sex chromosomes, and if you were born with XX sex chromosomes, you will die with XX sex chromosomes. Most, but not all, people fall into one of these two biologically-determined sex categories. Hermaphroditism is rare but should be noted here. As is XX male syndrome, but even in these cases, their own biological chromosomal inheritance cannot be altered. A hermaphrodite cannot biologically ‘unhermaphrodite’ themselves. None of the foregoing means to say a person cannot choose to ‘identify’ as a man when biologically a woman, or a woman when biologically a man. It’s a free world, after all. And it also doesn’t mean to say a fella can’t don a frock or a woman can’t waltz around in a well-fitted suit and tie. Wear what you want. However, identifying as one of the supposed 73 ‘genders’ is no different to my ‘identifying’ as a pig, or a snake, or a fish, when all my unalterable biological wiring says I’m a human being.
    3
  8844. 3
  8845. 3
  8846. 3
  8847. 3
  8848. 3
  8849. 3
  8850. 3
  8851. 3
  8852. 3
  8853. 3
  8854. 3
  8855. 3
  8856. 3
  8857. 3
  8858. 3
  8859. 3
  8860. 3
  8861. 3
  8862. 3
  8863. 3
  8864. 3
  8865. 3
  8866. 3
  8867. 3
  8868. 3
  8869. 3
  8870. 3
  8871. Yeah, yeah, but Oliver just falls into the trap of being one of the tribalists on the right reacting against the tribalists on the left. Whenever the topic of climate change/global warming comes up, as someone neither particularly right nor particularly left politically, I despair at how tribalised and polarised this debate becomes with each camp ensconced in their respective corners, equally convinced that their case is watertight. As ever with these things (and the reason I’m a centrist in almost everything), the truth lies somewhere in the middle. One of the most reasoned and balanced paragraphs I have ever read about this topic is the following from Stephen Pinker: If the emission of greenhouse gases continues, the Earth’s average temperature will rise to at least 1.5°C above the preindustrial level by the end of the 21st century, and perhaps to 4°C above that level or more. That will cause more frequent and more severe heat waves, more floods in wet regions, more droughts in dry regions, heavier storms, more severe hurricanes, lower crop yields in warm regions, the extinction of more species, the loss of coral reefs (because the oceans will be both warmer and more acidic), and an average rise in sea level of between 0.7 metres and 1.2 metres from both the melting of land ice and the expansion of seawater. (Sea level has already risen almost eight inches since 1870, and the rate of the rise appears to be accelerating.) Low-lying areas would be flooded, island nations would disappear beneath the waves, large stretches of farmland would no longer be arable, and millions of people would be displaced. The effects could get still worse in the 22nd century and beyond, and in theory could trigger upheavals such as a diversion of the Gulf Stream (which would turn Europe into Siberia) or a collapse of the Antarctic ice sheets. A rise of 2°C is considered the most that the world could reasonably adapt to, and a rise of 4°C, in the words of a 2012 World Bank report, “simply must not be allowed to occur.” The planet is warming. Fact. Humans (according to the overwhelming scientific consensus) are the principal cause of this warming over the past couple of centuries through fossil fuel burning. Now, given this, and given the consequences eloquently outlined by Pinker, we have to collectively decide whether we want to continue on this trajectory or not. For me, given the data, and given the projected consequences contingent upon that data, it makes utter sense to phase out fossil fuels. With this caveat: we must do it sensibly. They will be needed for some time to come as the transition to renewables is made. Who knows? Given that we are currently in an interglacial period, 500 years down the line when we have stopped using fossil fuels, the planet might start a rapid cooling trend leading to that ever-promised next Ice Age, and there might be a desperate clamour to start burning fossil fuels as quickly as possible!
    3
  8872. 3
  8873. 3
  8874. 3
  8875. 3
  8876. 3
  8877. 3
  8878. 3
  8879. 3
  8880. 3
  8881. 3
  8882. 3
  8883. 3
  8884. 3
  8885. 3
  8886. 3
  8887. 3
  8888. 3
  8889. 3
  8890. 3
  8891. 3
  8892. 3
  8893. 3
  8894. 3
  8895. 3
  8896. 3
  8897. 3
  8898. 3
  8899. 3
  8900. 3
  8901. 3
  8902. 3
  8903. 3
  8904. 3
  8905. 3
  8906. 3
  8907. 3
  8908. 3
  8909. 3
  8910. 3
  8911. 3
  8912. 3
  8913. 3
  8914. 3
  8915. 3
  8916. 3
  8917. 3
  8918. 3
  8919. 3
  8920. 3
  8921. 3
  8922. 3
  8923. 3
  8924. 3
  8925. 3
  8926. 3
  8927. 3
  8928. 3
  8929. 3
  8930. 3
  8931. 3
  8932. 3
  8933. 3
  8934. 3
  8935. 3
  8936. 3
  8937. 3
  8938. 3
  8939. 3
  8940. 3
  8941. 3
  8942. 3
  8943. 3
  8944. 3
  8945. 3
  8946. 3
  8947. 3
  8948. 3
  8949. 3
  8950. 3
  8951. 3
  8952. 3
  8953. 3
  8954. 3
  8955. 3
  8956. 3
  8957. 3
  8958. 3
  8959. 3
  8960. 3
  8961. 3
  8962. 3
  8963. 3
  8964. 3
  8965. 3
  8966. 3
  8967. 3
  8968. 3
  8969. 3
  8970. 3
  8971. 3
  8972. 3
  8973. 3
  8974. 3
  8975. 3
  8976. 3
  8977. 3
  8978. 3
  8979. 3
  8980. 3
  8981. 3
  8982. 3
  8983. 3
  8984. 3
  8985. 3
  8986. 3
  8987. 3
  8988. 3
  8989. 3
  8990. 3
  8991. 3
  8992. 3
  8993. 3
  8994. 3
  8995. 3
  8996. 3
  8997. 3
  8998. 3
  8999. 3
  9000. 3
  9001. 3
  9002. 3
  9003. 3
  9004. 3
  9005. 3
  9006. 3
  9007. 3
  9008. 3
  9009. 3
  9010. 3
  9011. 3
  9012. 3
  9013. 3
  9014. 3
  9015. 3
  9016. 3
  9017. 3
  9018. 3
  9019. 3
  9020. 3
  9021. 3
  9022. 3
  9023. 3
  9024. 3
  9025. 3
  9026. 3
  9027. 3
  9028. 3
  9029. 3
  9030. 3
  9031. 3
  9032. 3
  9033. 3
  9034. 3
  9035. 3
  9036. 3
  9037. 3
  9038. 3
  9039. 3
  9040. 3
  9041. 3
  9042. 3
  9043. 3
  9044. 3
  9045. 3
  9046. 3
  9047. 3
  9048. 3
  9049. 3
  9050. 3
  9051. 3
  9052. 3
  9053. 3
  9054. 3
  9055. 3
  9056. 3
  9057. 3
  9058. 3
  9059. 3
  9060. 3
  9061. 3
  9062. 3
  9063. 3
  9064. 3
  9065. 3
  9066. 3
  9067. 3
  9068. 3
  9069. 3
  9070. 3
  9071. 3
  9072. 3
  9073. 3
  9074. 3
  9075. 3
  9076. 3
  9077. 3
  9078. 3
  9079. 3
  9080. 3
  9081. 3
  9082. 3
  9083. 3
  9084. 3
  9085. 3
  9086. 3
  9087. 3
  9088. 3
  9089. 3
  9090. 3
  9091. 3
  9092. 3
  9093. 3
  9094. 3
  9095. 3
  9096. 3
  9097. 3
  9098. 3
  9099. 3
  9100. 3
  9101. 3
  9102. 3
  9103. 3
  9104. 3
  9105. 3
  9106. 3
  9107. 3
  9108. 3
  9109. 3
  9110. 3
  9111. 3
  9112. 3
  9113. 3
  9114. 3
  9115. 3
  9116. 3
  9117. 3
  9118. 3
  9119. 3
  9120. 3
  9121. 3
  9122. 3
  9123. 3
  9124. 3
  9125. 3
  9126. 3
  9127. 3
  9128. 3
  9129. 3
  9130. 3
  9131. 3
  9132. 3
  9133. 3
  9134. 3
  9135. 3
  9136. 3
  9137. 3
  9138. 3
  9139. 3
  9140. 3
  9141. 3
  9142. 3
  9143. 3
  9144. 3
  9145. 3
  9146. 3
  9147. 3
  9148. 3
  9149. 3
  9150. 3
  9151. 3
  9152. 3
  9153. 3
  9154. 3
  9155. 3
  9156. 3
  9157. 3
  9158. 3
  9159. 3
  9160. 3
  9161. 3
  9162. 3
  9163. 3
  9164. 3
  9165. 3
  9166. 3
  9167. 3
  9168. 3
  9169. 3
  9170. 3
  9171. 3
  9172. 3
  9173. 3
  9174. 3
  9175. 3
  9176. 3
  9177. 3
  9178. 3
  9179. 3
  9180. 3
  9181. 3
  9182. 3
  9183. 3
  9184. 3
  9185. 3
  9186. 3
  9187. 3
  9188. 3
  9189. 3
  9190. 3
  9191. 3
  9192. 3
  9193. 3
  9194. 3
  9195. 3
  9196. 3
  9197. 3
  9198. 3
  9199. 3
  9200. 3
  9201. 3
  9202. 3
  9203. 3
  9204. 3
  9205. 3
  9206. 3
  9207. 3
  9208. 3
  9209. 3
  9210. 3
  9211. 3
  9212. 3
  9213. 3
  9214. 3
  9215. 3
  9216. 3
  9217. Have you looked at the west’s geopolitical record, lately? US invades China 1945-46 - OK US invades Korea 1950-53 - OK US invades China (again) 1950-53 - OK US invades Guatemala 1954 - OK US invades Indonesia 1958 - OK US invades Cuba 1959-60 - OK US invades Guatemala (again) 1960 - OK US invades Belgian Congo 1964 - OK US invades Guatemala ( yet again) 1964 - OK US invades Dominican Republic 1965-66 - OK US invades Peru 1965 - OK US invades Laos 1964-73 - OK US invades Vietnam 1961-73 - OK US invades Cambodia 1969-70 - OK US invades Guatemala (and yet again) 1967-69 - OK US invades Lebanon 1982-84 - OK US invades Grenada 1983-84 - OK US invades Libya 1986 - OK US invades El Salvador 1981-92 - OK US invades Nicaragua 1981-90 - OK US invades Iran 1987-88 - OK US invades Libya (again) 1989 - OK US invades Panama 1989-90 - OK US invades Iraq 1991 - OK US invades Kuwait 1991 - OK US invades Somalia 1992-94 - OK US invades Bosnia 1995 - OK US invades Iran 1998 - OK US invades Sudan 1998 - OK US invades Afghanistan 1998 - OK US invades Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999 - OK US invades Afghanistan (again) 2001 - OK US invades Libya (yet again) 2011 - OK US invades Iraq (again) and Syria 2014 – OK US invades Somalia 2011 – OK US invades Iran 2020 – OK Russia invades Ukraine 2022 - not OK This list doesn’t include the dozens of other nations in which the US has interfered in the internal affairs of sovereign nations by overthrowing democratically-elected governments and installing proxies favourable to US/western interests. Including in 2014 in Ukraine itself. Also, I don’t condone Putin’s actions in Ukraine one iota. However, he is doing precisely nothing America and her partners haven’t been doing for decades. It constantly bemuses me how the west completely and utterly ignores the buckets of foreign blood they have spilt, while pointing the finger at the likes of Putin. The double standards hypocrisy is staggering as Putin is merely apeing the geopolitical modus operandi of the west and simply playing the tune it has been playing since at least 1492. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
    3
  9218. 3
  9219. 3
  9220. 3
  9221. 3
  9222. 3
  9223. 3
  9224. 3
  9225. 3
  9226. 3
  9227. 3
  9228. 3
  9229. 3
  9230. 3
  9231. 3
  9232. 3
  9233. 3
  9234. 3
  9235. 3
  9236. 3
  9237. 3
  9238. 3
  9239. 3
  9240. 3
  9241. 3
  9242. 3
  9243. 3
  9244. 3
  9245. 3
  9246. 3
  9247. 3
  9248. 3
  9249. 3
  9250. 3
  9251. 3
  9252. 3
  9253. 3
  9254. 3
  9255. 3
  9256. 3
  9257. 3
  9258. 3
  9259. 3
  9260. 3
  9261. 3
  9262. 3
  9263. 3
  9264. 3
  9265. 3
  9266. 3
  9267. 3
  9268. 3
  9269. 3
  9270. 3
  9271. 3
  9272. 3
  9273. 3
  9274. 3
  9275. 3
  9276. 3
  9277. 3
  9278. 3
  9279. 3
  9280. 3
  9281. 3
  9282. 3
  9283. 3
  9284. Jordan Peterson’s 12 rules for life - an appraisal. Stand up straight with your shoulders straight. Unless you’re a peeping Tom and need to keep below that wall, otherwise that gorgeous, undressing next-door neighbour may spot you. Treat yourself like someone you are responsible for helping. In other words, pick up your own smelly socks, don’t litter, and make your own fucking bed! Befriend people who want the best for you. Well, this rests on your judgement of others’ character. If that’s shit, you’re fucked. Compare yourself to who you were yesterday, not the useless person you are today. This one totally contradicts the whole idea of self-improvement, for if I’m more useless today than I was yesterday, why am I even trying to self-improve?! Do not let your children do anything that makes you dislike them. Well, this assumes that you’re such an insane parental control freak with such a fascistic sense of keeping another in order that it’s not even worth considering, if only to save your own soul. Besides, kids need to make their own mistakes, so tough-titty if the parents can’t take this. Set your house in order before criticising the world. Well, if you’re a saint, perhaps. If you’re a messy flesh and blood human being then criticising the world is what gets most of us through the day, if the drugs aren’t working. Pursue what is meaningful, not what is expedient. Yeah, but that makes the enormous, unfounded assumption that any of this means anything whatsoever. Tell the truth, or at least don’t lie. I’m sorry, but that time my mother caught my porn stash under the bed, I had to lie and pin it on my twin brother, Tommy. Sometimes, lying just is the best policy and those who say otherwise are just liars. Assume the person you are listening to knows something you don’t. Ok. But this one falls down when it comes to my bank PIN number. Be precise in your speech. What ‘precise’ in one’s speech like Mr Jordan ‘why use 1 word when 21 will do?’ Peterson? Give me the conciseness of a Sam Harris any day. I’m sure Adam Sandler will concur. Do not bother children while they are skateboarding. Unless, that is, they are skateboarding all over your prize flowerbeds; then you can not only ‘bother’ them, but collar them and let them feel your hot garlicky breath on their cheeks. Pet a cat when you encounter one in the street. Unless, that is, the cat is frothing alarmingly at the mouth. Now where’s my publishing deal?😳
    3
  9285. 3
  9286. 3
  9287. 3
  9288. 3
  9289. 3
  9290. 2
  9291. 2
  9292. 2
  9293. 2
  9294. 2
  9295. 2
  9296. 2
  9297. 2
  9298. 2
  9299. 2
  9300. 2
  9301. 2
  9302. 2
  9303. 2
  9304. 2
  9305. 2
  9306. 2
  9307. 2
  9308. 2
  9309. 2
  9310. 2
  9311. 2
  9312. 2
  9313. 2
  9314. 2
  9315. 2
  9316. 2
  9317. 2
  9318. 2
  9319. 2
  9320. 2
  9321. 2
  9322. 2
  9323. 2
  9324. 2
  9325. 2
  9326. 2
  9327. 2
  9328. 2
  9329. 2
  9330. 2
  9331. 2
  9332. 2
  9333. 2
  9334. 2
  9335. Peace talks in a fantasy world Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Ok, we want Russia to de-nuclearise and committed to not militarising the Russia/Ukraine border.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “We want Russia disarmed to ensure no threat to Ukraine (or anyone else)” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want protection for the Ukrainian language in eastern Ukraine.” Putin: “I want the de-Nazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want Russia to emerge from communist dictatorship and come into the light of free, liberal democracies.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “We want Moscow and St Petersburg to be recognised as free Ukrainian cities.” Peace talks in the real world Putin: Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “Done.” Moral of story: Sometimes bullies just get a little of what they want, but never mess with someone by pitching up at their home expecting to take it forcibly, for as Dustin Hoffman going apeshit in Strawdogs has shown: you are unlikely to win.
    2
  9336. 2
  9337. 2
  9338. 2
  9339. 2
  9340. 2
  9341. 2
  9342. 2
  9343. 2
  9344. 2
  9345. 2
  9346. 2
  9347. 2
  9348. 2
  9349. 2
  9350. 2
  9351. 2
  9352. 2
  9353. 2
  9354. 2
  9355. 2
  9356. 2
  9357. 2
  9358. 2
  9359. 2
  9360. 2
  9361. 2
  9362. 2
  9363. 2
  9364. 2
  9365. 2
  9366. 2
  9367. 2
  9368. 2
  9369. 2
  9370. 2
  9371. 2
  9372. 2
  9373. 2
  9374. 2
  9375. 2
  9376. 2
  9377. 2
  9378. 2
  9379. 2
  9380. 2
  9381. 2
  9382. 2
  9383. 2
  9384. 2
  9385. 2
  9386. 2
  9387. 2
  9388. 2
  9389. 2
  9390. 2
  9391. 2
  9392. 2
  9393. 2
  9394. 2
  9395. 2
  9396. 2
  9397. 2
  9398. 2
  9399. 2
  9400. 2
  9401. 2
  9402. 2
  9403. 2
  9404. 2
  9405. 2
  9406. 2
  9407. 2
  9408. 2
  9409. 2
  9410. 2
  9411. 2
  9412. 2
  9413. 2
  9414.  @easymoney8535  Moral absolutes exist only as they relate to human perceptions. Otherwise, there are no moral absolutes. For example, most people might believe the murder of another human being is absolutely immoral. That is only because the ones making the judgment are human beings. How do you know death isn’t a ‘good’ in this equation? You are assuming that death is to be avoided at all costs? Why? Many people live in misery of multifarious kinds and I’m willing to bet if you gave them a pill to end it all painlessly they would. If you are talking about the taking of another’s life against their expressed will, then of course, you are right and this is not to be desired. However, I repeat this basic point that you and your fellow haranguer don’t seem to be able to perceive: other people value different things in a hierarchy different to your particular hierarchy. Putin, for example, is clearly hell-bent and motivated on subsuming all Ukrainians into a greater Russia just because he has this vision and he has the means, having been untouched in his absolute corrupted power for 20 years. You need to recognise that his ‘values’ concerning his invasion of Ukraine and the slaughter of innocents therein take a completely different spin to your ‘values’ or my ‘values’. He has ends, and for him the means justify the ends. I repeat what I said before as it’s vital you get this if you are to have any understanding of human behaviour: no one does anything inappropriate given their model of the world. Putin’s model radically differs from your model, or my model of the world, but given the model Putin is operating from, absolutely nothing he is doing is inappropriate. You need to see this if we are to have any mutual understanding here. Morality is just something we make up as we go along, case by case. To walk down the path of moral absolutes, is to walk the path of every authoritarian who ever lived. There are no moral absolutes. We collectively agree that killing someone is a ‘bad thing’ but I can think of cases where killing another is a ‘good thing'. For example, imagine you are standing beside some tram tracks. In the distance, you spot a runaway trolley hurtling down the tracks towards five workers who cannot hear it coming. Even if they do spot it, they won’t be able to move out of the way in time. As this disaster looms, you glance down and see a lever connected to the tracks. You realise that if you pull the lever, the tram will be diverted down a second set of tracks away from the five unsuspecting workers. However, down this side track is one lone worker, just as oblivious as his colleagues. So, would you pull the lever, leading to one death but saving five? Well, would you? The trolley dilemma allows us to think through the consequences of an action and consider whether its moral value is determined solely by its outcome. I, personally, am a consequentialist/utilitarian when it comes to ethics/morality: that is, what’s the outcome, and what shall give the greatest happiness to the greatest number? As Shakespeare said: There is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so. What he is saying is that there are no moral absolutes. Sometimes killing someone is the ‘right’ decision. As to Putin, I repeat what I said numerous times in this thread: he’s a dick. The planet could do without him. However, and this is the key point: Putin doesn’t think he’s wrong, and unless we conjure with this truth we will get nowhere, and thereby probably enable further incursions into wherever his fancy may take him next.
    2
  9415. 2
  9416. 2
  9417. 2
  9418. 2
  9419. 2
  9420. 2
  9421. 2
  9422. 2
  9423. 2
  9424. 2
  9425. 2
  9426. 2
  9427. 2
  9428. 2
  9429. 2
  9430. 2
  9431. 2
  9432. 2
  9433. 2
  9434. 2
  9435. 2
  9436. 2
  9437. 2
  9438. 2
  9439. 2
  9440. 2
  9441. 2
  9442. 2
  9443. 2
  9444. 2
  9445. 2
  9446. 2
  9447. 2
  9448. 2
  9449. 2
  9450. 2
  9451. 2
  9452. 2
  9453. 2
  9454. 2
  9455. 2
  9456. 2
  9457. 2
  9458. 2
  9459. 2
  9460. 2
  9461. 2
  9462. 2
  9463. 2
  9464. 2
  9465. 2
  9466. 2
  9467. 2
  9468. 2
  9469. 2
  9470. 2
  9471. 2
  9472. 2
  9473. 2
  9474. 2
  9475. 2
  9476. 2
  9477. 2
  9478. 2
  9479. 2
  9480. 2
  9481. 2
  9482. 2
  9483. 2
  9484. 2
  9485. 2
  9486. 2
  9487. 2
  9488. 2
  9489. 2
  9490. 2
  9491. 2
  9492. 2
  9493. 2
  9494. 2
  9495. 2
  9496. 2
  9497. 2
  9498. 2
  9499. 2
  9500. 2
  9501. 2
  9502. 2
  9503. 2
  9504. 2
  9505. 2
  9506. 2
  9507. 2
  9508. 2
  9509. 2
  9510. 2
  9511. 2
  9512. 2
  9513. 2
  9514. 2
  9515. 2
  9516. 2
  9517. 2
  9518. 2
  9519. 2
  9520. 2
  9521. 2
  9522. 2
  9523. 2
  9524. 2
  9525. 2
  9526. 2
  9527. 2
  9528. 2
  9529. 2
  9530. 2
  9531. 2
  9532. 2
  9533. 2
  9534. 2
  9535. 2
  9536. 2
  9537. 2
  9538. 2
  9539. 2
  9540. 2
  9541. 2
  9542. 2
  9543. 2
  9544. 2
  9545. 2
  9546. 2
  9547. 2
  9548. 2
  9549. 2
  9550. 2
  9551. 2
  9552. 2
  9553. 2
  9554. 2
  9555. 2
  9556. 2
  9557. 2
  9558. 2
  9559. 2
  9560. 2
  9561. 2
  9562. 2
  9563. 2
  9564. 2
  9565. 2
  9566. 2
  9567. 2
  9568. 2
  9569. 2
  9570. 2
  9571. 2
  9572. 2
  9573. 2
  9574. 2
  9575. 2
  9576. 2
  9577. 2
  9578. 2
  9579. 2
  9580. 2
  9581. 2
  9582. 2
  9583. 2
  9584. 2
  9585. 2
  9586. 2
  9587. 2
  9588. 2
  9589. 2
  9590. 2
  9591. 2
  9592. 2
  9593. 2
  9594. 2
  9595. 2
  9596. 2
  9597. 2
  9598. 2
  9599. 2
  9600. 2
  9601. 2
  9602. 2
  9603. 2
  9604. 2
  9605. 2
  9606. 2
  9607. 2
  9608. 2
  9609. 2
  9610. 2
  9611. 2
  9612. 2
  9613. 2
  9614. 2
  9615. 2
  9616. 2
  9617. 2
  9618. 2
  9619. 2
  9620. 2
  9621. 2
  9622. 2
  9623. 2
  9624. 2
  9625. 2
  9626. 2
  9627. 2
  9628. 2
  9629. 2
  9630. 2
  9631. 2
  9632. 2
  9633. 2
  9634. 2
  9635. 2
  9636. 2
  9637. 2
  9638. 2
  9639. 2
  9640. 2
  9641. 2
  9642. 2
  9643. 2
  9644. 2
  9645. 2
  9646. 2
  9647. 2
  9648. 2
  9649. 2
  9650. 2
  9651. 2
  9652. 2
  9653. 2
  9654. 2
  9655. 2
  9656. 2
  9657. 2
  9658. 2
  9659. 2
  9660. 2
  9661. 2
  9662. 2
  9663. 2
  9664. 2
  9665. 2
  9666. 2
  9667. 2
  9668. 2
  9669. 2
  9670. 2
  9671. 2
  9672. 2
  9673. 2
  9674. 2
  9675. 2
  9676. 2
  9677. 2
  9678. 2
  9679. 2
  9680. 2
  9681. 2
  9682. 2
  9683. 2
  9684. 2
  9685. 2
  9686. 2
  9687. 2
  9688. 2
  9689.  @carlgrove8793  I can tell you categorically having been brought up in a quite strict religious tradition, that Dawkins’ description is in no way over the top. The Old Testament God is a horrendously brutal character and I’m just glad he doesn’t actually exist! As for the Koran, well this is not a pleasant book, particularly if you’re not Muslim. Infidels are brutally condemned, jihad is openly sanctioned, women often come off second best, homosexuals and homosexuality are demonised, and so it goes on. Neither book is particularly conducive to the creation of open, tolerant, decent people, to say the least. Look at the Koran again if you don’t believe me. I’ll give you this almost at random concerning jihad: The believers who stay at home - apart from those that suffer from a grave impediment - are not the equal of those who fight for the cause of God with their goods and their persons. God has given those that fight with their goods and their persons a higher rank than those who stay at home. God has promised all a good reward; but far richer is the recompense of those who fight for Him … He that leaves his dwelling to fight for God and His apostle and is then overtaken by death, shall be rewarded by God … the unbelievers are your inveterate enemies. (Koran 4:95-101) This stuff is chilling quite simply because Islam never underwent any kind of Reformation whereby this toxic, dangerous crap might not be taken quite so literally. As it is, if I’m a Muslim reading these words, it’s explicitly exhorting me to go and fight others for my religion. It can’t be read any other way. I repeat, I’m no atheist, but I’m most certainly against these rigid, primitive, barbaric, monotheistic texts that have benighted humanity for 2000 years. Organised religion, along with nationalism are the two most baleful disasters humanity ever had the misfortune to invent.
    2
  9690. 2
  9691.  @carlgrove8793  I tend to agree, up to a point. I’m an upholder of absolute free-speech, meaning that I personally would advocate anyone being able to say absolutely anything they want to say, yes, including what others would perhaps claim as incitement to violence. I accept that in the real world, that that, perhaps, isn’t going to float, but my line is when words are turned into actions. So, you can say what you want, if you want, but make sure you have the evidence for your claims. As to burning ‘holy’ books: on the one hand, I can see this as incendiary from a certain point of view, from another absolutist free-speech point of view, I don’t particularly have an issue with it, although it’s not necessarily conducive to the operations of a peaceful civil society in the long run. I suppose what this all boils down to is what are you offended by? Most, if not all, people have certain triggers, but these triggers vary from person to person. Nothing particularly triggers me, as I have trained myself not to be offended; by anything, really. However, if you’re going to stray into the realms of slander/libel, then make sure you have the evidence, that’s all. Free-speech as long as you are not inciting violence is perhaps the best we can hope for here in the real world. That means all religion should be open to criticism. Personally, I have an anathema to all the acknowledged monotheistic religions, seeing the literal adherence to medieval, barbaric, primitive texts unworthy of thinking human beings. The Bible and the Koran, in my opinion, are horrendously brutal texts if you read them literally. However, I read them as I read the Greek/Roman myths; as repositories of fanciful, but sometimes instructive tales; but the last thing you want to do is be taking any of it literally, for that way madness lies, as the past 2000 years demonstrate, and as the current events in Malmö demonstrate.
    2
  9692. 2
  9693. 2
  9694. 2
  9695. 2
  9696. 2
  9697. 2
  9698. 2
  9699. 2
  9700. 2
  9701. 2
  9702. 2
  9703.  @s0vhjfe4SA08adc9js  In case you missed it first time round: Incidentally, if Russia decided to form a Canada-Mexico pact and based weapons 4 minutes from Washington DC, do you really think America would let that happen, given that country’s egregious record of invading others’ territories and/or overturning democratically-elected governments from within and ruling by proxy? Of course not. America is the most hypocritical, double standards modus operandi nation par excellence. She meddles in the affairs of virtually every single other sovereign territory on this planet in her time, almost bar none, historically, and yet when someone like Putin (whom I don’t support) suggests he might not want a bank of NATO territories rammed up against Russia’s borders that’s somehow not on on his part? Get real. US invades China 1945-46 - OK US invades Korea 1950-53 - OK US invades China (again) 1950-53 - OK US invades Guatemala 1954 - OK US invades Indonesia 1958 - OK US invades Cuba 1959-60 - OK US invades Guatemala 1960 - OK US invades Belgian Congo 1964 - OK US invades Guatemala (again) 1964 - OK US invades Dominican Republic 1965-66 - OK US invades Peru 1965 - OK US invades Laos 1964-73 - OK US invades Vietnam 1961-73 - OK US invades Cambodia 1969-70 - OK US invades Guatemala (yet again) 1967-69 - OK US invades Lebanon 1982-84 - OK US invades Grenada 1983-84 - OK US invades Libya 1986 - OK US invades El Salvador 1981-92 - OK US invades Nicaragua 1981-90 - OK US invades Iran 1987-88 - OK US invades Libya (again) 1989 - OK US invades Panama 1989-90 - OK US invades Iraq 1991 - OK US invades Kuwait 1991 - OK US invades Somalia 1992-94 - OK US invades Bosnia 1995 - OK US invades Iran 1998 - OK US invades Sudan 1998 - OK US invades Afghanistan 1998 - OK US invades Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999 - OK US invades Afghanistan (again) 2001 - OK US invades Libya (yet again) 2011 - OK US invades Iraq (again) and Syria 2014 – OK US invades Somalia 2011 – OK US invades Iran 2020 – OK Russia invades Ukraine 2022 - not OK I don’t call that ‘losing the argument’ you hypocritical, double standards fool.
    2
  9704. 2
  9705.  @curiositycloset2359  You don’t need to lecture me, mate. I’m neutral here. I do my research. I’m fully aware Zelensky is no angel. Although Russia is an aggressor for sure here, it’s hardly been unprovoked, and this is really a Civil War (particularly from Putin’s point of view). NATO reneging on its agreement not to expand post 1989 has provoked Putin. Casual flouting of 2014 Minsk agreements not to aggress against pro-Russian Ukrainians in the east, leading to the loss of about 14,000 has provoked Putin. The 2014 coup having much evidence (surprise! surprise!) of the paw prints of the CIA\USA has provoked Putin. Zelensky has publicly expressed a desire to acquire nuclear weapons, understandably spooking Moscow and thereby provoking Putin. There’s also the stench of corrupt family Biden deals with Ukraine, as well, which might explain sleepy Joe’s reluctance to get directly involved here. For now. Add to this Putin’s statement that the dissolution of the Soviet Empire was the ‘most tragic geopolitical event of the 20th century’, along with his belief in the greater mother Russia project and bringing the recalcitrant (as he sees them) Ukrainians back into the Slavic familial bosom and you have a perfect storm in which Putin feels justified in rolling his tanks into another sovereign, self-governing territory. He’s deluded in doing this, of course, as most Ukrainians want nothing to do with him, and rightly so. None of the above makes what Putin is doing right, but it makes it a little more understandable from Putin’s/Russia’s point of view. So, you see? I get all that stuff. I return to my fundamental point: the majority will of Ukrainians seems to want nothing to do with Putin’s Russia. You need to acknowledge this or forever hold your peace.
    2
  9706. 2
  9707. 2
  9708. 2
  9709. 2
  9710. 2
  9711. 2
  9712. 2
  9713. 2
  9714. 2
  9715. 2
  9716. 2
  9717. 2
  9718. 2
  9719. 2
  9720. 2
  9721. 2
  9722. 2
  9723. 2
  9724. 2
  9725. 2
  9726. 2
  9727. 2
  9728. 2
  9729. 2
  9730. 2
  9731. 2
  9732. 2
  9733. 2
  9734. 2
  9735. 2
  9736. 2
  9737. 2
  9738. 2
  9739. 2
  9740. 2
  9741. 2
  9742. 2
  9743. 2
  9744. 2
  9745. 2
  9746. 2
  9747. 2
  9748. 2
  9749. 2
  9750. 2
  9751. 2
  9752. 2
  9753. 2
  9754. 2
  9755. 2
  9756. 2
  9757. 2
  9758. 2
  9759. 2
  9760.  @TC8787-yq7og  In this whole wider immigration debate, there’s a subtle difference between ‘multiculturalism’ and ‘multiethnicism’. I have a problem with the former if it means each separate cultural group living their own lives parallel and separate from the broad main national culture, which I really only see in a cohort of Muslims (in Sweden, the UK, France and many other western European states). However, I have zero issue with multiethnicism, thereby rebuking you claim I’m somehow ‘racist’. The colour of your skin bothers me not a jot; it’s only your ideas I care about, and the ideas tend to come into play with ‘multiculturalism’ and separate cultures living side by side. I tend to see only a lack of integration in a cohort of Muslims living in the UK, and Europe more generally. I don’t see it in, for example, Chinese/Indians/Poles/ etc. Another thing I would say is that I have lived for long stretches in several places around the world and in every single one of these places only 3 things was asked of me: speak the language, pay taxes and don’t break the law. Now, obviously, I wasn’t living in these places permanently, but tbh, that’s all I really ask of those who come here. Most do these things and as they produce generations, these generations tend to meld with the whole. It’s only a rump of Muslims who want none of this. And as a previous speaker in these comments said, a big part of the issue is more moderate Muslims staying silent when their more vehement brethren are causing trouble for everyone wherever they go.
    2
  9761. 2
  9762. 2
  9763. 2
  9764. 2
  9765. 2
  9766. 2
  9767. 2
  9768. 2
  9769. 2
  9770. 2
  9771. 2
  9772. 2
  9773. 2
  9774. 2
  9775. 2
  9776. 2
  9777. 2
  9778. 2
  9779. 2
  9780. 2
  9781. 2
  9782. 2
  9783. 2
  9784. 2
  9785. 2
  9786. 2
  9787. 2
  9788. 2
  9789. 2
  9790. 2
  9791. 2
  9792. 2
  9793. 2
  9794. 2
  9795. 2
  9796. 2
  9797. 2
  9798. 2
  9799. 2
  9800. 2
  9801. 2
  9802. 2
  9803. 2
  9804. 2
  9805. 2
  9806. 2
  9807. 2
  9808. 2
  9809. 2
  9810. 2
  9811. 2
  9812. 2
  9813. 2
  9814. 2
  9815. 2
  9816. 2
  9817. 2
  9818. 2
  9819. 2
  9820. 2
  9821. 2
  9822. 2
  9823. 2
  9824. 2
  9825. 2
  9826. 2
  9827. 2
  9828. 2
  9829. 2
  9830. 2
  9831. 2
  9832. 2
  9833. 2
  9834. 2
  9835. 2
  9836. 2
  9837. 2
  9838. 2
  9839. 2
  9840. 2
  9841. 2
  9842. 2
  9843. 2
  9844. 2
  9845. 2
  9846. 2
  9847. 2
  9848. 2
  9849. 2
  9850. 2
  9851. 2
  9852. 2
  9853. 2
  9854. 2
  9855. 2
  9856. 2
  9857. 2
  9858. 2
  9859. 2
  9860. 2
  9861. 2
  9862. 2
  9863. 2
  9864. 2
  9865. 2
  9866. 2
  9867. 2
  9868. 2
  9869. 2
  9870. 2
  9871. 2
  9872. 2
  9873. 2
  9874. 2
  9875. 2
  9876. 2
  9877. 2
  9878. 2
  9879. 2
  9880. 2
  9881. 2
  9882. 2
  9883. 2
  9884. 2
  9885. 2
  9886. 2
  9887. 2
  9888. 2
  9889. 2
  9890. 2
  9891. 2
  9892. 2
  9893. 2
  9894. 2
  9895. 2
  9896. 2
  9897. 2
  9898. 2
  9899. 2
  9900. 2
  9901. 2
  9902. 2
  9903. 2
  9904. 2
  9905. 2
  9906. 2
  9907. 2
  9908. 2
  9909. 2
  9910. 2
  9911. 2
  9912. 2
  9913. 2
  9914. 2
  9915. 2
  9916. 2
  9917. 2
  9918. 2
  9919. 2
  9920. 2
  9921. 2
  9922. 2
  9923. 2
  9924. 2
  9925. 2
  9926. 2
  9927. 2
  9928. 2
  9929. 2
  9930. 2
  9931. 2
  9932. 2
  9933. 2
  9934. 2
  9935. 2
  9936. 2
  9937. 2
  9938. 2
  9939. 2
  9940. 2
  9941. 2
  9942. 2
  9943. 2
  9944. 2
  9945. 2
  9946. 2
  9947. 2
  9948. 2
  9949. 2
  9950. 2
  9951. 2
  9952. 2
  9953. 2
  9954. 2
  9955. 2
  9956. 2
  9957. 2
  9958. 2
  9959. 2
  9960. 2
  9961. 2
  9962. 2
  9963. 2
  9964. 2
  9965. 2
  9966. 2
  9967. 2
  9968. 2
  9969. 2
  9970. 2
  9971. 2
  9972. 2
  9973. 2
  9974. 2
  9975. 2
  9976. 2
  9977. 2
  9978. 2
  9979. 2
  9980. 2
  9981. 2
  9982. 2
  9983. 2
  9984. 2
  9985. 2
  9986. 2
  9987. 2
  9988. 2
  9989. 2
  9990. 2
  9991. 2
  9992. 2
  9993. 2
  9994. 2
  9995. 2
  9996. 2
  9997. 2
  9998. 2
  9999. 2
  10000. 2
  10001. 2
  10002. 2
  10003. 2
  10004. 2
  10005. 2
  10006. 2
  10007. 2
  10008. 2
  10009. 2
  10010. 2
  10011. 2
  10012. 2
  10013. 2
  10014. 2
  10015. 2
  10016. 2
  10017. 2
  10018. 2
  10019. 2
  10020. 2
  10021. 2
  10022. 2
  10023. 2
  10024. 2
  10025. 2
  10026. 2
  10027. 2
  10028. 2
  10029. 2
  10030. 2
  10031. 2
  10032. 2
  10033. 2
  10034. 2
  10035. 2
  10036. 2
  10037. 2
  10038. 2
  10039. 2
  10040. 2
  10041. 2
  10042. 2
  10043. 2
  10044. 2
  10045. 2
  10046. 2
  10047. 2
  10048. 2
  10049. 2
  10050. 2
  10051. 2
  10052. 2
  10053. 2
  10054. 2
  10055. 2
  10056. 2
  10057. 2
  10058. 2
  10059. 2
  10060. 2
  10061. 2
  10062. 2
  10063. 2
  10064. 2
  10065. 2
  10066. 2
  10067. 2
  10068. 2
  10069. 2
  10070. 2
  10071. 2
  10072. 2
  10073. 2
  10074. 2
  10075. 2
  10076. 2
  10077. 2
  10078. 2
  10079. 2
  10080. 2
  10081. 2
  10082. 2
  10083. 2
  10084. 2
  10085. 2
  10086. 2
  10087. 2
  10088. 2
  10089. 2
  10090. 2
  10091. 2
  10092. 2
  10093. 2
  10094. 2
  10095. 2
  10096. 2
  10097. 2
  10098. 2
  10099. 2
  10100. 2
  10101. 2
  10102. 2
  10103. 2
  10104. 2
  10105. 2
  10106. 2
  10107. 2
  10108. 2
  10109. 2
  10110. 2
  10111. 2
  10112. 2
  10113. 2
  10114. 2
  10115. 2
  10116. 2
  10117. 2
  10118. 2
  10119. 2
  10120. 2
  10121. 2
  10122. 2
  10123. 2
  10124. 2
  10125. 2
  10126. 2
  10127. 2
  10128. 2
  10129. 2
  10130. 2
  10131. 2
  10132. 2
  10133. 2
  10134. 2
  10135. 2
  10136. 2
  10137. 2
  10138. 2
  10139. 2
  10140. 2
  10141. 2
  10142. 2
  10143. 2
  10144. 2
  10145. 2
  10146. 2
  10147. 2
  10148. 2
  10149. 2
  10150. 2
  10151. 2
  10152. 2
  10153. 2
  10154. 2
  10155. 2
  10156. 2
  10157. 2
  10158. 2
  10159. 2
  10160. 2
  10161. 2
  10162. 2
  10163. 2
  10164. 2
  10165. 2
  10166. 2
  10167. 2
  10168. 2
  10169. 2
  10170. 2
  10171. 2
  10172. 2
  10173. 2
  10174. 2
  10175. 2
  10176. 2
  10177. 2
  10178. 2
  10179. 2
  10180. 2
  10181. 2
  10182. 2
  10183. 2
  10184. 2
  10185. 2
  10186. 2
  10187. 2
  10188. 2
  10189. 2
  10190. 2
  10191. 2
  10192. 2
  10193. 2
  10194. 2
  10195. 2
  10196. 2
  10197. 2
  10198. 2
  10199. 2
  10200. 2
  10201. 2
  10202. 2
  10203. 2
  10204. 2
  10205. 2
  10206. 2
  10207. 2
  10208. 2
  10209. 2
  10210. 2
  10211. 2
  10212. 2
  10213. 2
  10214. 2
  10215. 2
  10216. 2
  10217. 2
  10218. 2
  10219. 2
  10220. 2
  10221. 2
  10222. 2
  10223. 2
  10224. 2
  10225. 2
  10226. 2
  10227. 2
  10228. 2
  10229. 2
  10230. 2
  10231. 2
  10232. 2
  10233. 2
  10234. 2
  10235. 2
  10236. 2
  10237. 2
  10238. 2
  10239. 2
  10240. 2
  10241. 2
  10242. 2
  10243. 2
  10244. 2
  10245. 2
  10246.  @atlasnetwork7855  1. I wasn’t suggesting people don’t have a right to these opinions; I was just pointing it out as I see it. Moreover, I have absolutely no issue, personally, with these opinions being expressed. 2. I disagree. I would say that if being sexist, racist and homophobic isn’t ‘right-wing’, then we are going to render such terms meaningless thereby. 3. You are naive to suggest that folk who are strongly anti-immigration aren’t somewhat racist. Not all, but lots are; perhaps the majority in their various ways. For the record, I get why people are intolerant of what they see as mass immigration and think this is a national referendum issue; however, there is a strong streak of racism behind much of the anti-immigration thing in my experience. 4. I stand by my claim that those I’m aware of who are strongly anti-European, are often anti-women, anti-gays, and anti-just about any other culture you care to mention that isn’t their own narrow one. 5. Not necessarily ‘Europhile’; that’s perhaps exaggerating it. I think you’re missing my general point here. This is, that people who are broadly educated in the liberal tradition are more likely to have fewer issues with foreign cultures generally. That’s all I was really saying. Don’t get too sidetracked with the Brexit thing in this regard. 6. We may have to agree to disagree here, mate. Your points are well made and I’m on board with much of what you say, but I stand by what I’ve said in this thread.
    2
  10247. 2
  10248. 2
  10249. 2
  10250. 2
  10251. 2
  10252. 2
  10253. 2
  10254. 2
  10255. 2
  10256. 2
  10257. 2
  10258. 2
  10259. 2
  10260. 2
  10261. 2
  10262. 2
  10263. 2
  10264. 2
  10265. 2
  10266. 2
  10267. 2
  10268. 2
  10269. 2
  10270. 2
  10271. 2
  10272. 2
  10273. 2
  10274. 2
  10275. 2
  10276. 2
  10277. 2
  10278. 2
  10279. 2
  10280. 2
  10281. 2
  10282. 2
  10283. 2
  10284. 2
  10285. 2
  10286. 2
  10287. 2
  10288. 2
  10289. 2
  10290. 2
  10291. 2
  10292. 2
  10293. 2
  10294. 2
  10295. 2
  10296. 2
  10297. 2
  10298. 2
  10299. US invades China 1945-46 - OK US invades Korea 1950-53 - OK US invades China (again) 1950-53 - OK US invades Guatemala 1954 - OK US invades Indonesia 1958 - OK US invades Cuba 1959-60 - OK US invades Guatemala 1960 - OK US invades Belgian Congo 1964 - OK US invades Guatemala (again) 1964 - OK US invades Dominican Republic 1965-66 - OK US invades Peru 1965 - OK US invades Laos 1964-73 - OK US invades Vietnam 1961-73 - OK US invades Cambodia 1969-70 - OK US invades Guatemala (yet again) 1967-69 - OK US invades Lebanon 1982-84 - OK US invades Grenada 1983-84 - OK US invades Libya 1986 - OK US invades El Salvador 1981-92 - OK US invades Nicaragua 1981-90 - OK US invades Iran 1987-88 - OK US invades Libya (again) 1989 - OK US invades Panama 1989-90 - OK US invades Iraq 1991 - OK US invades Kuwait 1991 - OK US invades Somalia 1992-94 - OK US invades Bosnia 1995 - OK US invades Iran 1998 - OK US invades Sudan 1998 - OK US invades Afghanistan 1998 - OK US invades Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999 - OK US invades Afghanistan (again) 2001 - OK US invades Libya (yet again) 2011 - OK US invades Iraq (again) and Syria 2014 – OK US invades Somalia 2011 – OK US invades Iran 2020 – OK Russia invades Ukraine 2022 - not OK I don’t condone Putin’s actions in Ukraine one iota. However, he is doing precisely nothing America and her partners haven’t been doing for decades. It constantly bemuses me how the west completely and utterly ignores the buckets of foreign blood they have spilt, while pointing the finger at the likes of Putin. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
    2
  10300. 2
  10301. 2
  10302. 2
  10303. 2
  10304. 2
  10305. 2
  10306. 2
  10307. 2
  10308. 2
  10309. 2
  10310. 2
  10311. 2
  10312. 2
  10313. 2
  10314. 2
  10315. 2
  10316. 2
  10317. 2
  10318. 2
  10319. 2
  10320. 2
  10321. 2
  10322. 2
  10323. 2
  10324. 2
  10325. 2
  10326. 2
  10327. 2
  10328. 2
  10329. 2
  10330. 2
  10331. 2
  10332. 2
  10333. 2
  10334. 2
  10335. 2
  10336. 2
  10337. 2
  10338. 2
  10339. 2
  10340. US invades China 1945-46 - OK US invades Korea 1950-53 - OK US invades China (again) 1950-53 - OK US invades Guatemala 1954 - OK US invades Indonesia 1958 - OK US invades Cuba 1959-60 - OK US invades Guatemala (again) 1960 - OK US invades Belgian Congo 1964 - OK US invades Guatemala ( yet again) 1964 - OK US invades Dominican Republic 1965-66 - OK US invades Peru 1965 - OK US invades Laos 1964-73 - OK US invades Vietnam 1961-73 - OK US invades Cambodia 1969-70 - OK US invades Guatemala (and yet again) 1967-69 - OK US invades Lebanon 1982-84 - OK US invades Grenada 1983-84 - OK US invades Libya 1986 - OK US invades El Salvador 1981-92 - OK US invades Nicaragua 1981-90 - OK US invades Iran 1987-88 - OK US invades Libya (again) 1989 - OK US invades Panama 1989-90 - OK US invades Iraq 1991 - OK US invades Kuwait 1991 - OK US invades Somalia 1992-94 - OK US invades Bosnia 1995 - OK US invades Iran 1998 - OK US invades Sudan 1998 - OK US invades Afghanistan 1998 - OK US invades Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999 - OK US invades Afghanistan (again) 2001 - OK US invades Libya (yet again) 2011 - OK US invades Iraq (again) and Syria 2014 – OK US invades Somalia 2011 – OK US invades Iran 2020 – OK Russia invades Ukraine 2022 - not OK This list doesn’t include the dozens of other sovereign nations in which the US has interfered in the internal affairs of by overthrowing democratically-elected governments and installing proxies favourable to US/western interests. Including in 2014 in Ukraine itself. Also, I don’t condone Putin’s actions in Ukraine one iota. However, he is doing precisely nothing America and her partners haven’t been doing for decades. It constantly bemuses me how the west completely and utterly ignores the buckets of foreign blood they have spilt, while pointing the finger at the likes of Putin. The double standards hypocrisy is staggering as Putin is merely apeing the geopolitical modus operandi of the west and simply playing the tune it has been playing since at least 1492. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
    2
  10341. 2
  10342. 2
  10343. 2
  10344. 2
  10345. 2
  10346. 2
  10347. 2
  10348. 2
  10349. 2
  10350. 2
  10351. 2
  10352. 2
  10353. 2
  10354. 2
  10355. 2
  10356. 2
  10357. 2
  10358. 2
  10359. 2
  10360. 2
  10361. 2
  10362. 2
  10363. 2
  10364. 2
  10365. 2
  10366. 2
  10367. 2
  10368. 2
  10369. 2
  10370. 2
  10371. 2
  10372. The greatest problem humanity faces, and has always faced, is one of perspective. We have narrowed our vision such that are unable to see the universal wood for the exclusive trees. We have hitched our star to this or that family, clan, tribe, nationalism, religion, such that we have become deluded, unable to serenely see what actually is. We are cosmic dust on a grain of sand, one of trillions of grains of sand, whirling around a nuclear reactor, one of trillions of nuclear reactors and we are willing to abase ourselves to murdering one another for an accident of birth, or an imagined daddy in the sky? Has it come to this? There are alien civilisations who use this Earth as a cosmic pit stop on their intergalactic travels and they look at us and weep. They have perspective. They can literally see the Earth in toto. They cannot see the pettifogging, sanguinary squabbles over this or that imaginary line drawn on a map. They cannot see the ignorant ranters championing their imagined God, ranked against the ignorant ranters championing their imaginary God. The solution to all this nonsense is very simple. Expand your terms of self-definition. Refuse to accept a random, arbitrary accident of birth as a salient marker of your identity. Refuse to accept unthought-out shibboleths handed down to you to shore up your fear of death. Refuse to be proud, unless your pride is grounded in self-motivated, self-guided achievement, and not some random, bizarre, nonsensical ‘pride’ based on the fact your mother happened to plop you out here, and not there. None of this would matter a fig, but for a key point: we now, at this critical juncture in our cosmic journey, face the very real and present danger of incinerating this planet and everything on it. Really. We are better than that.😳
    2
  10373. 2
  10374. 2
  10375. 2
  10376. 2
  10377. 2
  10378. 2
  10379. 2
  10380. 2
  10381. 2
  10382. 2
  10383. 2
  10384. 2
  10385. 2
  10386. 2
  10387. 2
  10388. 2
  10389. 2
  10390.  @elkapitan75  The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is driven by several factors: ethnic, national, historical, and religious. Religious identity is the key factor that impacts this issue existentially. Why is religion at the core of this conflict? Several religious factors pertinent to Islam and Judaism dictate the role of religion as the main factor in the conflict, notably including the sanctity of holy sites and the apocalyptic narratives of both religions, which are detrimental to any potential for lasting peace between the two sides. Extreme religious Zionists in Israel increasingly see themselves as guardians and definers of how the Jewish state should be, and are very stringent when it comes to any concessions to the Arabs. On the other hand, Islamist groups in Palestine and elsewhere in the Islamic world advocate the necessity of liberating the “holy” territories and sites for religious reasons, and preach violence and hatred against Israel and the Jewish people. Religion-based rumors propagated by extremists in the media and social media about the hidden religious agendas of the other side exacerbate these tensions. Examples include rumors about a “Jewish Plan” to destroy al Aqsa mosque and build the Jewish third temple on its remnants, and, on the other side rumors that Muslims hold the annihilation of Jews at the core of their belief. In addition, worsening socio-economic conditions in the Arab and Islamic world contribute to the growth of religious radicalism, pushing a larger percentage of youth towards fanaticism, and religion-inspired politics. The advent of the Arab spring, ironically, also posed a threat to Arab-Israeli peace, as previously stable regimes were often challenged by extreme political views. A prominent example was the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, who after succeeding to the presidency in 2012, threatened to compromise the peace agreement with Israel based on their religious ideology – even if they did not immediately tear up the treaty. That , son, is what religion has to do with this issue.
    2
  10391. 2
  10392. 2
  10393. 2
  10394. 2
  10395. 2
  10396. 2
  10397. 2
  10398. 2
  10399. 2
  10400. 2
  10401. 2
  10402. 2
  10403. 2
  10404. 2
  10405. 2
  10406. 2
  10407. 2
  10408. 2
  10409. 2
  10410. 2
  10411. 2
  10412. 2
  10413. 2
  10414. 2
  10415. 2
  10416. 2
  10417. 2
  10418. 2
  10419. 2
  10420. 2
  10421. 2
  10422. 2
  10423. 2
  10424. 2
  10425. 2
  10426. 2
  10427. 2
  10428. 2
  10429. 2
  10430. 2
  10431. 2
  10432. 2
  10433. 2
  10434. 2
  10435. 2
  10436. 2
  10437. 2
  10438. 2
  10439. 2
  10440. 2
  10441. 2
  10442. 2
  10443. 2
  10444. 2
  10445. 2
  10446. 2
  10447. 2
  10448. 2
  10449. 2
  10450. 2
  10451. 2
  10452. 2
  10453. 2
  10454. 2
  10455. 2
  10456. 2
  10457. 2
  10458. 2
  10459. 2
  10460. 2
  10461. 2
  10462. 2
  10463. 2
  10464. 2
  10465. 2
  10466. 2
  10467. 2
  10468. 2
  10469. 2
  10470. 2
  10471. 2
  10472. 2
  10473. 2
  10474. 2
  10475. 2
  10476. 2
  10477. 2
  10478. 2
  10479. 2
  10480. 2
  10481. 2
  10482. 2
  10483. 2
  10484. What’s happening in France can be correlated with Brexit and Trump. Instead of looking at this in terms of traditional left versus right, David Goodheart’s thesis of two distinct ‘tribes’, the ‘anywheres’ and the ‘somewheres’, with irreconcilable differences may be applicable here. Brexiteers, Trumpeteers and Le Penistas fall into the ‘somewhere’ camp and they may be seen as rooted in geographical identity - the Scottish farmer; working-class Geordie; Cornish housewife - who find rapid changes to the modern world unsettling; are socially conservative; are likely to be older and less well educated and less mobile. This manifests in supporting anti-mass-immigration policies, strong support for the Armed Forces, suspicion of the EU, and more widely ‘other’ cultures, strong support for strict law enforcement (including the death penalty), and a general authoritarianism and the notion that the primary job of Britain’s leaders is to put British interests first. ‘Anywheres’ are footloose; often urban; university educated; socially liberal; egalitarian and meritocratic in their attitudes to race, sexuality, and gender; are able to migrate and integrate comfortably into other places; are often strong supporters of the EU and globalisation; are lighter in their attachments to larger group identities, including national ones, valuing autonomy and self-realisation before stability, community and tradition. What’s happening in France may be seen as a battle between the Anywheres and the Somewheres just as Brexit and Trump’s election may be seen in these terms.
    2
  10485. 2
  10486. 2
  10487. 2
  10488. 2
  10489. 2
  10490. 2
  10491. 2
  10492. 2
  10493. 2
  10494. 2
  10495. 2
  10496. 2
  10497. 2
  10498. 2
  10499. 2
  10500. 2
  10501. 2
  10502. 2
  10503. 2
  10504. 2
  10505. 2
  10506. 2
  10507. 2
  10508. 2
  10509. 2
  10510.  @Lalo3g1  He was far from unprovoked, though. Although Russia is an aggressor for sure here, it’s hardly been unprovoked, and this is really a Civil War (particularly from Putin’s point of view). NATO reneging on its agreement not to expand post 1989 has provoked Putin. Casual flouting of 2014 Minsk agreements not to aggress against pro-Russian Ukrainians in the east, leading to the loss of about 14,000 has provoked Putin. The 2014 coup having much evidence (surprise! surprise!) of the paw prints of the CIA\USA has provoked Putin. Zelensky has publicly expressed a desire to acquire nuclear weapons, understandably spooking Moscow and thereby provoking Putin. There’s also the stench of corrupt family Biden deals with Ukraine, as well, which might explain sleepy Joe’s reluctance to get directly involved here. For now. Add to this Putin’s statement that the dissolution of the Soviet Empire was the ‘most tragic geopolitical event of the 20th century’, along with his belief in the greater mother Russia project and bringing the recalcitrant (as he sees them) Ukrainians back into the Slavic familial bosom and you have a perfect storm in which Putin feels justified in rolling his tanks into another sovereign, self-governing territory. He’s deluded in doing this, of course, as most Ukrainians want nothing to do with him, and rightly so. None of the above makes what Putin is doing right, but it makes it a little more understandable from Putin’s/Russia’s point of view.
    2
  10511. 2
  10512. 2
  10513. 2
  10514. 2
  10515. 2
  10516. 2
  10517. 2
  10518. 2
  10519. 2
  10520. 2
  10521. 2
  10522. 2
  10523. 2
  10524. 2
  10525. 2
  10526. 2
  10527. 2
  10528. 2
  10529. 2
  10530. 2
  10531. 2
  10532. 2
  10533. 2
  10534. 2
  10535. 2
  10536. 2
  10537. 2
  10538. 2
  10539. 2
  10540. 2
  10541. 2
  10542. 2
  10543. 2
  10544. 2
  10545. 2
  10546. 2
  10547. 2
  10548. 2
  10549. 2
  10550. 2
  10551. 2
  10552. 2
  10553. 2
  10554. 2
  10555. 2
  10556. 2
  10557. 2
  10558. 2
  10559. 2
  10560. 2
  10561. 2
  10562. 2
  10563. 2
  10564. 2
  10565. 2
  10566. 2
  10567. 2
  10568. 2
  10569. 2
  10570. 2
  10571. 2
  10572. 2
  10573. 2
  10574. 2
  10575. 2
  10576. 2
  10577. 2
  10578. 2
  10579. 2
  10580. 2
  10581. 2
  10582. 2
  10583. 2
  10584. 2
  10585. 2
  10586. 2
  10587. 2
  10588. 2
  10589. 2
  10590. 2
  10591. 2
  10592. 2
  10593. 2
  10594. 2
  10595. 2
  10596. 2
  10597. 2
  10598. 2
  10599. 2
  10600. 2
  10601. 2
  10602. 2
  10603. 2
  10604. 2
  10605. 2
  10606. 2
  10607. 2
  10608. 2
  10609. 2
  10610. 2
  10611. 2
  10612. 2
  10613. 2
  10614. 2
  10615. 2
  10616. 2
  10617. 2
  10618. 2
  10619. 2
  10620. 2
  10621. 2
  10622. 2
  10623. 2
  10624. 2
  10625. 2
  10626. 2
  10627. 2
  10628. 2
  10629. 2
  10630. 2
  10631. 2
  10632. 2
  10633. 2
  10634. 2
  10635. 2
  10636. 2
  10637. 2
  10638. 2
  10639. 2
  10640. 2
  10641. 2
  10642. 2
  10643. 2
  10644. 2
  10645. Peace talks in a fantasy world Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Ok, we want Russia to de-nuclearise and committed to not militarising the Russia/Ukraine border.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “We want Russia disarmed to ensure no threat to Ukraine (or anyone else)” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want protection for the Ukrainian language in eastern Ukraine.” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want Russia to emerge from communist dictatorship and come into the light of free, liberal democracies.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “We want Moscow and St Petersburg to be recognised as free Ukrainian cities.” Peace talks in the real world Putin: Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “Done.” Moral of story: Sometimes bullies just get a little of what they want, but never mess with someone by pitching up at their home expecting to take it forcibly, for as Dustin Hoffman going apeshit in Strawdogs has shown: you are unlikely to win.
    2
  10646. 2
  10647. 2
  10648. 2
  10649. 2
  10650. 2
  10651. 2
  10652. 2
  10653. 2
  10654. 2
  10655. 2
  10656. 2
  10657. 2
  10658. US invades China 1945-46 - OK US invades Korea 1950-53 - OK US invades China (again) 1950-53 - OK US invades Guatemala 1954 - OK US invades Indonesia 1958 - OK US invades Cuba 1959-60 - OK US invades Guatemala 1960 - OK US invades Belgian Congo 1964 - OK US invades Guatemala (again) 1964 - OK US invades Dominican Republic 1965-66 - OK US invades Peru 1965 - OK US invades Laos 1964-73 - OK US invades Vietnam 1961-73 - OK US invades Cambodia 1969-70 - OK US invades Guatemala (yet again) 1967-69 - OK US invades Lebanon 1982-84 - OK US invades Grenada 1983-84 - OK US invades Libya 1986 - OK US invades El Salvador 1981-92 - OK US invades Nicaragua 1981-90 - OK US invades Iran 1987-88 - OK US invades Libya (again) 1989 - OK US invades Panama 1989-90 - OK US invades Iraq 1991 - OK US invades Kuwait 1991 - OK US invades Somalia 1992-94 - OK US invades Bosnia 1995 - OK US invades Iran 1998 - OK US invades Sudan 1998 - OK US invades Afghanistan 1998 - OK US invades Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999 - OK US invades Afghanistan (again) 2001 - OK US invades Libya (yet again) 2011 - OK US invades Iraq (again) and Syria 2014 – OK US invades Somalia 2011 – OK US invades Iran 2020 – OK Russia invades Ukraine 2022 - not OK I don’t condone Putin’s actions in Ukraine one iota. However, he is doing precisely nothing America and her partners haven’t been doing for decades. It constantly bemuses me how the west completely and utterly ignores the buckets of foreign blood they have spilt, while pointing the finger at the likes of Putin. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
    2
  10659. 2
  10660. 2
  10661. 2
  10662. 2
  10663. 2
  10664. 2
  10665. 2
  10666. 2
  10667. 2
  10668. 2
  10669. 2
  10670. 2
  10671. 2
  10672. 2
  10673. 2
  10674. 2
  10675. 2
  10676. 2
  10677. 2
  10678. 2
  10679. 2
  10680. 2
  10681. 2
  10682. 2
  10683. 2
  10684. 2
  10685. 2
  10686. 2
  10687. 2
  10688. 2
  10689. 2
  10690. 2
  10691. 2
  10692. 2
  10693. 2
  10694. 2
  10695. 2
  10696. 2
  10697. 2
  10698. 2
  10699. 2
  10700. 2
  10701. 2
  10702. 2
  10703. 2
  10704. 2
  10705. 2
  10706. “You know that most cases of FGM are consensual, right? Many people are raised in environments where this practice is normalised, so they don’t see any issue with it. They consent to it.” (Jegamespeed5399, aka ‘JayBits’)🤦‍♂️ Don’t be silly, son. Do you honestly think 12 year old girls in their right minds are going to willingly consent to having their genitals lopped off? That admission alone demonstrates where you are at. 🤦‍♂️Can you not think for yourself, for once, dude? I suggest to you, aged 12, that we chop off your cock for no reason. Do you consent to this? 🤦‍♂️ “Listen, hun, after school today me and your mother are going to take you to have a completely unnecessary medical procedure involving having your clitoris hacked off thereby leading to your being unable to have sexual pleasure ever and leading to the following possible complications:” •severe pain •excessive bleeding (haemorrhage) •genital tissue swelling •fever •infections e.g., tetanus •urinary problems •wound healing problems •injury to surrounding genital tissue •shock •vaginal problems (discharge, itching, bacterial vaginosis and other infections) menstrual problems (painful menstruations, difficulty in passing menstrual blood, etc.) •scar tissue and keloid •sexual problems (pain during intercourse, decreased satisfaction) •increased risk of childbirth complications (difficult delivery, excessive bleeding, caesarean section, need to resuscitate the baby, etc.) and newborn deaths •need for later surgeries: for example, the sealing or narrowing of the vaginal opening (type 3) may lead to the practice of cutting open the sealed vagina later to allow for sexual intercourse and childbirth (deinfibulation). Sometimes genital tissue is stitched again several times, including after childbirth, hence the woman goes through repeated opening and closing procedures, further increasing both immediate and long-term risks •psychological problems (depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, low self-esteem, etc.) •death “Now, darling, would you like to consent to this completely unnecessary procedure?” 🤦‍♂️
    2
  10707. 2
  10708. It’s a process. It’s a process whereby gay men and women simply gain the right to have consensual adult sex free of fear of criminalisation involving fines, imprisonment or worse, wherever they are on the planet. The following is a timeline list of when and where homosexuality was decriminalised. This list is interesting as it gives the lie, somewhat, to the idea that decriminalising homosexuality is a wholly (or even a mainly) ‘Western thing’, so apparently feared by lube-head here. To pick some examples at random to demonstrate this: Turkey decriminalised in 1858; Japan in 1882; Taiwan in 1912; Thailand in 1956… while it was as late as 1967 in England/Wales and, remarkably, even later in the country of my birth, Scotland, in 1981. Equally remarkably, it was as late as 1993 before it was decriminalised in Washington DC, another 10 years after this before all the states had decriminalised. Added to this is the notable fact that in the list where homosexuality has never been illegal, almost every single country, without exception, is non-Western. •Never been illegal Aruba, Netherlands Benin Burkina Faso Cambodia Central African Republic Cocos (Keeling) Islands Republic of the Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo Christmas Island, Australia Curaçao Curaçao, Netherlands Djibouti Equatorial Guinea French Polynesia, France Indonesia Ivory Coast Laos Madagascar Mali Mayotte, France Federated States of Micronesia New Caledonia, France Niger North Korea Rwanda Sint Maarten, Netherlands South Korea Philippines Vietnam Wallis and Futuna, France •18th Century 1791: Andorra France Kingdom of France (includes Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique, Réunion, San Barthélemy, Saint Martin, and Saint Pierre and Miquelon) Haiti Saint-Domingue (Haiti) 1793: Monaco 1794: Luxembourg 1795: Belgium 1798: Canton of Geneva, Switzerland Ticino, Switzerland Vaud, Switzerland Valais, Switzerland •19th Century 1811: Netherlands 1822: Dominican Republic El Salvador 1830: Brazil 1832: Bolivia 1853: Argentina 1858: Turkey 1864: San Marino 1869: Suriname 1871: Guatemala Mexico 1882: Japan 1890: Italy Vatican City 1899: Honduras •20th Century 1912: Taiwan 1924: Peru 1933: Denmark (includes Greenland and Faroe Islands) 1932: Poland 1934: Uruguay 1940: Iceland 1942: Switzerland 1944: Sweden 1951: Greece Jordan Palestine 1956: Thailand 1961: Hungary 1962: Czechoslovakia Illinois, United States 1967: England and Wales, United Kingdom 1968: Bulgaria East Germany 1969: Canada West Germany 1971: Austria Connecticut, United States Costa Rica Finland 1972: Colorado, United States Oregon, United States Norway 1973: Delaware, United States Hawaii, United States Malta North Dakota, United States 1974: Massachusetts, United States Ohio, United States 1975: East Timor New Hampshire, United States New Mexico, United States South Australia 1976: Australian Capital Territory Bahrain California, United States Indiana, United States Maine, United States Washington (state), United States West Virginia, United States 1977: Croatia Montenegro Slovenia South Dakota, United States Vermont, United States Wyoming, United States 1978: Guam, United States Iowa, United States Nebraska, United States New Jersey, United States 1979: Cuba Spain 1980: American, United States New York, United States Pennsylvania, United States 1981: Colombia Scotland, United Kingdom Victoria, Australia 1982: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom 1983: Guernsey, United Kingdom Northern Mariana Islands Northern Territory, Australia Portugal Wisconsin, United States 1984: New South Wales, Australia 1985: Virgin Islands, United States 1986: New Zealand 1988: Israel 1989: Falkland Islands, United Kingdom Liechtenstein 1990: Jersey, United Kingdom Paraguay Western Australia 1991: Bahamas Abkhazia Hong Kong Queensland, Australia South Ossetia Ukraine 1992: Estonia Isle of Man, United Kingdom Kentucky, United States Latvia 1993: Washington, D.C. District of Columbia, United States Gibraltar, United Kingdom Guinea-Bissau Republic of Ireland Lithuania Mongolia Nevada Nevada, United States Norfolk Island, Australia Russia 1994: Kosovo Belarus Bermuda Bermuda, United Kingdom Serbia 1995: Albania Moldova 1996: Bosnia and Herzegovina Portuguese Macau North Macedonia Romania Tennessee, United States 1997: China Ecuador Montana, United States Tasmania, Australia Venezuela 1998: Cyprus Cyprus Georgia, United States Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina Rhode Island, United States South Africa Tajikistan 1999: Chile Maryland, United States 2000: Akrotiri and Dhekelia, United Kingdom Azerbaijan Georgia (country) •21st Century 2001: Anguilla, United Kingdom Arizona, United States Bosnia and Herzegovina British Virgin Islands Cayman Islands, United Kingdom Minnesota, United States Montserrat, United Kingdom Saint Helena Pitcairn Islands, United Kingdom Turks and Caicos Islands, United Kingdom 2002: Arkansas, United States Transnistria 2003: Armenia Tokelau, New Zealand United States (nationwide) 2004: Cape Verde 2005: Marshall Islands 2007: Nepal Vanuatu 2008: Nicaragua Panama 2010: Fiji 2012: Lesotho São Tomé and Príncipe 2014: Northern Cyprus Palau 2015: Mozambique 2016: Belize Nauru Seychelles 2018: India Trinidad and Tobago 2019: Botswana 2020: Gabon 2021: Angola Bhutan 2022: Antigua and Barbuda Barbados Singapore Saint Kitts and Nevis 2023: Cook Islands, New Zealand Mauritius 2024: Dominica Namibia
    2
  10709. 2
  10710. 2
  10711. 2
  10712. 2
  10713. 2
  10714. 2
  10715. 2
  10716. The Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Act (2023) prescribes up to twenty years in prison for ‘promotion of homosexuality’, life imprisonment for ‘homosexual acts’, and the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’. 1. How, exactly, can you ‘promote’ homosexuality? This isn’t about trying to persuade people to become gay, as if you are trying to persuade people to vote for you, or persuade people to buy a new whizz-bang, fancy-pants vibrator (ijumpjudy has just put in her order - extra batteries included 😉); that’s impossible. It’s not like you can ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. So, primitively prescribing 20 years imprisonment for something you either are or aren’t no matter how much ‘promoting’ is done is bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ 2. There are no such things as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’. If this term refers to anal/oral sex, then, spoiler alert: millions of heterosexuals engage in these acts, too, so to describe them as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’ makes zero sense. Even if we accept that giving/receiving a BJ or having anal sex is a ‘homosexual act’, you’re really going to imprison someone for life for this? 🤦‍♂️ 3. ‘Aggravated homosexuality’ has the death penalty as its punishment and is described as an offence including ‘serial offenders, same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality.’ Ok, let’s break this down: •‘serial offenders’ - presumably this means people who just have consenting sex on many occasions. Death for this? 🤦‍♂️ •‘same-sex rape’ - as with heterosexual rape, this should obviously be criminalised, but I wouldn’t support death for it. •‘sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation’ - in the case of a position of authority, if the other person consents to the sex, I see no issue with it. If intimidation is involved and no consent given, then this should be criminalised. •‘sex with persons older than 75’ - lol. I see absolutely no reason to criminalise someone for having sex with anyone who is above the age of consent. If that person is 75, 85 or 105, and they consent to the sex, then to institute the death penalty for this is hilariously irrational. 🤦‍♂️ •‘sex with the disabled and mentally ill’ - lol. If a disabled gay man or woman wants to have sex, where’s the fucking issue? 🤷‍♂️ Death for this? Yer having a fucking larff, aincha? 🤦‍♂️ Obviously, the mentally ill could be compromised when it comes to consent, so this needs sensitivity. •‘homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality’ - so, if someone has been convicted just once for, say, giving a BJ (which isn’t actually a ‘homosexual act’, as we’ve established there is no such thing) to his partner, and he’s caught doing it again, you kill him? Really? 🤦‍♂️ When you look closely at the Bill, it becomes increasingly ridiculous and barely believable that in 2024 we are criminalising people for simply having consensual adult sex. 🤦‍♂️
    2
  10717. 2
  10718. 2
  10719. 2
  10720. 2
  10721. 2
  10722. 2
  10723. 2
  10724. The Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Act (2023) prescribes up to twenty years in prison for ‘promotion of homosexuality’, life imprisonment for ‘homosexual acts’, and the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’. 1. How, exactly, can you ‘promote’ homosexuality? This isn’t about trying to persuade people to become gay, as if you are trying to persuade people to vote for you, or persuade people to buy a new whizz-bang, fancy-pants vibrator (ijumpjudy has just put in her order - extra batteries included 😉); that’s impossible. It’s not like you can ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. So, primitively prescribing 20 years imprisonment for something you either are or aren’t no matter how much ‘promoting’ is done is bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ 2. There are no such things as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’. If this term refers to anal/oral sex, then, spoiler alert: millions of heterosexuals engage in these acts, too, so to describe them as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’ is stupid and renders the description invalid. Even if we accept that giving/receiving a BJ or having anal sex is a ‘homosexual act’, you’re really going to imprison someone for life for this? 🤦‍♂️ 3. ‘Aggravated homosexuality’ has the death penalty as its punishment and is described as an offence including ‘serial offenders, same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality.’ Ok, let’s break this down: •‘serial offenders’ - presumably this means people who just have consenting sex on many occasions. Death? Don’t be silly. 🤦‍♂️ •‘same-sex rape’ - as with heterosexual rape, this should obviously be criminalised, but I wouldn’t support death for it. •‘sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation’ - in the case of a position of authority, if the other person consents to the sex, I see no issue with it. If intimidation is involved and no consent given, then this should be criminalised. •‘sex with persons older than 75’ - lol. I see absolutely no reason to criminalise someone for having sex with anyone who is above the age of consent. If that person is 75, 85 or 105, and they consent to the sex, then to institute the death penalty for this is quite nonsensical. 🤦‍♂️ •‘sex with the disabled and mentally ill’ - lol. If a disabled gay man or woman wants to have sex, where’s the fucking issue? 🤷‍♂️ Death for this? Yer having a fucking larff, aincha? 🤦‍♂️ Obviously, the mentally ill could be compromised when it comes to consent, so this needs sensitivity. •‘homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality’ - so, if someone has been convicted just once for, say, giving a BJ (which isn’t actually a ‘homosexual act’, as we’ve established there is no such thing) to his partner, and he’s caught doing it again, you kill him? Really? 🤦‍♂️ When you look closely at the Bill, it becomes increasingly ridiculous and barely believable that in 2024 we are criminalising people for simply having consensual adult sex. 🤦‍♂️
    2
  10725. 2
  10726. 2
  10727. 2
  10728. 2
  10729. 2
  10730. 2
  10731. 2
  10732. 2
  10733. 2
  10734. 2
  10735. 2
  10736. 2
  10737. 2
  10738. 2
  10739. 2
  10740. 2
  10741. 2
  10742. 2
  10743. 2
  10744. 2
  10745. 2
  10746. 2
  10747. 2
  10748. 2
  10749. 2
  10750. 2
  10751. 2
  10752. 2
  10753. 2
  10754. 2
  10755. 2
  10756. 2
  10757. 2
  10758. 2
  10759. 2
  10760. 2
  10761. 2
  10762. 2
  10763. 2
  10764. 2
  10765. 2
  10766. 2
  10767. The Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Act (2023) prescribes up to twenty years in prison for ‘promotion of homosexuality’, life imprisonment for ‘homosexual acts’, and the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’. 1. How, exactly, can you ‘promote’ homosexuality? This isn’t about trying to persuade people to become gay, as if you are trying to persuade people to vote for you, or persuade people to buy a new whizz-bang, fancy-pants vibrator (ijumpjudy has just put in her order - extra batteries included 😉); that’s impossible. It’s not like you can ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. So, primitively prescribing 20 years imprisonment for something you either are or aren’t no matter how much ‘promoting’ is done is bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ 2. There are no such things as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’. If this term refers to anal/oral sex, then, spoiler alert: millions of heterosexuals engage in these acts, too, so to describe them as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’ is bizarre, indeed. Even if we accept that giving/receiving a BJ or having anal sex is a ‘homosexual act’, you’re really going to imprison someone for life for this? 🤦‍♂️ 3. ‘Aggravated homosexuality’ has the death penalty as its punishment and is described as an offence including ‘serial offenders, same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality.’ Ok, let’s break this down: •‘serial offenders’ - presumably this means people who just have consenting sex on many occasions. Death? Bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ •‘same-sex rape’ - as with heterosexual rape, this should obviously be criminalised, but I wouldn’t support death for it. •‘sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation’ - in the case of a position of authority, if the other person consents to the sex, I see no issue with it. If intimidation is involved and no consent given, then this should be criminalised. •‘sex with persons older than 75’ - lol. I see absolutely no reason to criminalise someone for having sex with anyone who is above the age of consent. If that person is 75, 85 or 105, and they consent to the sex, then to institute the death penalty for this is quite bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ •‘sex with the disabled and mentally ill’ - lol. If a disabled gay man or woman wants to have sex, where’s the fucking issue? 🤷‍♂️ Death for this? Yer having a fucking larff, aincha? 🤦‍♂️ Obviously, the mentally ill could be compromised when it comes to consent, so this needs sensitivity. •‘homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality’ - so, if someone has been convicted just once for, say, giving a BJ (which isn’t actually a ‘homosexual act’, as we’ve established there is no such thing) to his partner, and he’s caught doing it again, you kill him? Really? 🤦‍♂️ When you look closely at the Bill, it becomes increasingly ridiculous and barely believable that in 2024 we are criminalising people for simply having consensual adult sex. 🤦‍♂️
    2
  10768. 2
  10769. 2
  10770. 2
  10771. 2
  10772. 2
  10773. 2
  10774. 2
  10775. 2
  10776. 2
  10777. 2
  10778. 2
  10779. 2
  10780. 2
  10781. 2
  10782. 2
  10783. 2
  10784. 2
  10785. 2
  10786. 2
  10787. It’s a process. It’s a process whereby gay men and women simply gain the right to have consensual adult sex free of fear of criminalisation involving fines, imprisonment or worse, wherever they are on the planet. The following is a timeline list of when and where homosexuality was decriminalised. This list is interesting as it gives the lie, somewhat, to the idea that decriminalising homosexuality is a wholly (or even a mainly) ‘Western thing’, so apparently feared by lube-head here. To pick some examples at random to demonstrate this: Turkey decriminalised in 1858; Japan in 1882; Taiwan in 1912; Thailand in 1956… while it was as late as 1967 in England/Wales and, remarkably, even later in the country of my birth, Scotland, in 1981. Equally remarkably, it was as late as 1993 before it was decriminalised in Washington DC, another 10 years after this before all the states had decriminalised. Added to this is the notable fact that in the list where homosexuality has never been illegal, almost every single country, without exception, is non-Western. •Never been illegal Aruba, Netherlands Benin Burkina Faso Cambodia Central African Republic Cocos (Keeling) Islands Republic of the Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo Christmas Island, Australia Curaçao Curaçao, Netherlands Djibouti Equatorial Guinea French Polynesia, France Indonesia Ivory Coast Laos Madagascar Mali Mayotte, France Federated States of Micronesia New Caledonia, France Niger North Korea Rwanda Sint Maarten, Netherlands South Korea Philippines Vietnam Wallis and Futuna, France •18th Century 1791: Andorra France Kingdom of France (includes Guadeloupe, French Guiana, Martinique, Réunion, San Barthélemy, Saint Martin, and Saint Pierre and Miquelon) Haiti Saint-Domingue (Haiti) 1793: Monaco 1794: Luxembourg 1795: Belgium 1798: Canton of Geneva, Switzerland Ticino, Switzerland Vaud, Switzerland Valais, Switzerland •19th Century 1811: Netherlands 1822: Dominican Republic El Salvador 1830: Brazil 1832: Bolivia 1853: Argentina 1858: Turkey 1864: San Marino 1869: Suriname 1871: Guatemala Mexico 1882: Japan 1890: Italy Vatican City 1899: Honduras •20th Century 1912: Taiwan 1924: Peru 1933: Denmark (includes Greenland and Faroe Islands) 1932: Poland 1934: Uruguay 1940: Iceland 1942: Switzerland 1944: Sweden 1951: Greece Jordan Palestine 1956: Thailand 1961: Hungary 1962: Czechoslovakia Illinois, United States 1967: England and Wales, United Kingdom 1968: Bulgaria East Germany 1969: Canada West Germany 1971: Austria Connecticut, United States Costa Rica Finland 1972: Colorado, United States Oregon, United States Norway 1973: Delaware, United States Hawaii, United States Malta North Dakota, United States 1974: Massachusetts, United States Ohio, United States 1975: East Timor New Hampshire, United States New Mexico, United States South Australia 1976: Australian Capital Territory Bahrain California, United States Indiana, United States Maine, United States Washington (state), United States West Virginia, United States 1977: Croatia Montenegro Slovenia South Dakota, United States Vermont, United States Wyoming, United States 1978: Guam, United States Iowa, United States Nebraska, United States New Jersey, United States 1979: Cuba Spain 1980: American, United States New York, United States Pennsylvania, United States 1981: Colombia Scotland, United Kingdom Victoria, Australia 1982: Northern Ireland, United Kingdom 1983: Guernsey, United Kingdom Northern Mariana Islands Northern Territory, Australia Portugal Wisconsin, United States 1984: New South Wales, Australia 1985: Virgin Islands, United States 1986: New Zealand 1988: Israel 1989: Falkland Islands, United Kingdom Liechtenstein 1990: Jersey, United Kingdom Paraguay Western Australia 1991: Bahamas Abkhazia Hong Kong Queensland, Australia South Ossetia Ukraine 1992: Estonia Isle of Man, United Kingdom Kentucky, United States Latvia 1993: Washington, D.C. District of Columbia, United States Gibraltar, United Kingdom Guinea-Bissau Republic of Ireland Lithuania Mongolia Nevada Nevada, United States Norfolk Island, Australia Russia 1994: Kosovo Belarus Bermuda Bermuda, United Kingdom Serbia 1995: Albania Moldova 1996: Bosnia and Herzegovina Portuguese Macau North Macedonia Romania Tennessee, United States 1997: China Ecuador Montana, United States Tasmania, Australia Venezuela 1998: Cyprus Cyprus Georgia, United States Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina Rhode Island, United States South Africa Tajikistan 1999: Chile Maryland, United States 2000: Akrotiri and Dhekelia, United Kingdom Azerbaijan Georgia (country) •21st Century 2001: Anguilla, United Kingdom Arizona, United States Bosnia and Herzegovina British Virgin Islands Cayman Islands, United Kingdom Minnesota, United States Montserrat, United Kingdom Saint Helena Pitcairn Islands, United Kingdom Turks and Caicos Islands, United Kingdom 2002: Arkansas, United States Transnistria 2003: Armenia Tokelau, New Zealand United States (nationwide) 2004: Cape Verde 2005: Marshall Islands 2007: Nepal Vanuatu 2008: Nicaragua Panama 2010: Fiji 2012: Lesotho São Tomé and Príncipe 2014: Northern Cyprus Palau 2015: Mozambique 2016: Belize Nauru Seychelles 2018: India Trinidad and Tobago 2019: Botswana 2020: Gabon 2021: Angola Bhutan 2022: Antigua and Barbuda Barbados Singapore Saint Kitts and Nevis 2023: Cook Islands, New Zealand Mauritius 2024: Dominica Namibia
    2
  10788. 2
  10789. The Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Act (2023) prescribes up to twenty years in prison for ‘promotion of homosexuality’, life imprisonment for ‘homosexual acts’, and the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’. 1. How, exactly, can you ‘promote’ homosexuality? This isn’t about trying to persuade people to become gay, as if you are trying to persuade people to vote for you, or persuade people to buy a new whizz-bang, fancy-pants vibrator (ijumpjudy has just put in her order - extra batteries included 😉); that’s impossible. It’s not like you can ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. So, primitively prescribing 20 years imprisonment for something you either are or aren’t no matter how much ‘promoting’ is done is bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ 2. There are no such things as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’. If this term refers to anal/oral sex, then, spoiler alert: millions of heterosexuals engage in these acts, too, so to describe them as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’ is bizarre, indeed. Even if we accept that giving/receiving a BJ or having anal sex is a ‘homosexual act’, you’re really going to imprison someone for life for this? 🤦‍♂️ 3. ‘Aggravated homosexuality’ has the death penalty as its punishment and is described as an offence including ‘serial offenders, same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality.’ Ok, let’s break this down: •‘serial offenders’ - presumably this means people who just have consenting sex on many occasions. Death? Bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ •‘same-sex rape’ - as with heterosexual rape, this should obviously be criminalised, but I wouldn’t support death for it. •‘sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation’ - in the case of a position of authority, if the other person consents to the sex, I see no issue with it. If intimidation is involved and no consent given, then this should be criminalised. •‘sex with persons older than 75’ - lol. I see absolutely no reason to criminalise someone for having sex with anyone who is above the age of consent. If that person is 75, 85 or 105, and they consent to the sex, then to institute the death penalty for this is quite bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ •‘sex with the disabled and mentally ill’ - lol. If a disabled gay man or woman wants to have sex, where’s the fucking issue? 🤷‍♂️ Death for this? Yer having a fucking larff, aincha? 🤦‍♂️ Obviously, the mentally ill could be compromised when it comes to consent, so this needs sensitivity. •‘homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality’ - so, if someone has been convicted just once for, say, giving a BJ (which isn’t actually a ‘homosexual act’, as we’ve established there is no such thing) to his partner, and he’s caught doing it again, you kill him? Really? 🤦‍♂️ When you look closely at the Bill, it becomes increasingly ridiculous and barely believable that in 2024 we are criminalising people for simply having consensual adult sex. 🤦‍♂️
    2
  10790. 2
  10791. 2
  10792. 2
  10793. 2
  10794. 2
  10795. 2
  10796. 2
  10797. 2
  10798. 2
  10799. 2
  10800. 2
  10801. 2
  10802. 2
  10803. 2
  10804. 2
  10805. 2
  10806. 2
  10807. 2
  10808. 2
  10809. 2
  10810. 2
  10811. 2
  10812. 2
  10813. 2
  10814. 2
  10815. 2
  10816. 2
  10817. 2
  10818. 2
  10819. 2
  10820. 2
  10821. 2
  10822. 2
  10823. 2
  10824. “You know that most cases of FGM are consensual, right? Many people are raised in environments where this practice is normalised, so they don’t see any issue with it. They consent to it.” (Jegamespeed5399) 🤦‍♂️ Don’t be silly, son. Do you honestly think 12 year old girls in their right minds are going to willingly consent to having their genitals lopped off? That admission alone demonstrates where you are at. 🤦‍♂️Can you not think for yourself, for once, dude? I suggest to you, aged 12, that we chop off your cock for no reason. Do you consent to this? 🤦‍♂️ “Listen, hun, after school today me and your mother are going to take you to have a completely unnecessary medical procedure involving having your clitoris hacked off thereby leading to your being unable to have sexual pleasure ever and leading to the following possible complications:” •severe pain •excessive bleeding (haemorrhage) •genital tissue swelling •fever •infections e.g., tetanus •urinary problems •wound healing problems •injury to surrounding genital tissue •shock •vaginal problems (discharge, itching, bacterial vaginosis and other infections) menstrual problems (painful menstruations, difficulty in passing menstrual blood, etc.) •scar tissue and keloid; •sexual problems (pain during intercourse, decreased satisfaction) •increased risk of childbirth complications (difficult delivery, excessive bleeding, caesarean section, need to resuscitate the baby, etc.) and newborn deaths •need for later surgeries: for example, the sealing or narrowing of the vaginal opening (type 3) may lead to the practice of cutting open the sealed vagina later to allow for sexual intercourse and childbirth (deinfibulation). Sometimes genital tissue is stitched again several times, including after childbirth, hence the woman goes through repeated opening and closing procedures, further increasing both immediate and long-term risks •psychological problems (depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, low self-esteem, etc.). •death. “Now, darling, would you like to consent to this completely unnecessary procedure?” 🤦‍♂️ ​​⁠​​⁠
    2
  10825. 2
  10826. 2
  10827. 2
  10828. 2
  10829. 2
  10830. 2
  10831. 2
  10832. 2
  10833. 2
  10834. 2
  10835. 2
  10836. 2
  10837. 2
  10838. 2
  10839. 2
  10840. 2
  10841. 2
  10842. 2
  10843. The Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Act (2023) prescribes up to twenty years in prison for ‘promotion of homosexuality’, life imprisonment for ‘homosexual acts’, and the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’. 1. How, exactly, can you ‘promote’ homosexuality? This isn’t about trying to persuade people to become gay, as if you are trying to persuade people to vote for you, or persuade people to buy a new whizz-bang, fancy-pants vibrator (ijumpjudy has just put in her order - extra batteries included 😉); that’s impossible. It’s not like you can ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. So, primitively prescribing 20 years imprisonment for something you either are or aren’t no matter how much ‘promoting’ is done is bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ 2. There are no such things as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’. If this term refers to anal/oral sex, then, spoiler alert: millions of heterosexuals engage in these acts, too, so to describe them as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’ makes zero sense. Even if we accept that giving/receiving a BJ or having anal sex is a ‘homosexual act’, you’re really going to imprison someone for life for this? 🤦‍♂️ 3. ‘Aggravated homosexuality’ has the death penalty as its punishment and is described as an offence including ‘serial offenders, same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality.’ Ok, let’s break this down: •‘serial offenders’ - presumably this means people who just have consenting sex on many occasions. Death for this? 🤦‍♂️ •‘same-sex rape’ - as with heterosexual rape, this should obviously be criminalised, but I wouldn’t support death for it. •‘sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation’ - in the case of a position of authority, if the other person consents to the sex, I see no issue with it. If intimidation is involved and no consent given, then this should be criminalised. •‘sex with persons older than 75’ - lol. I see absolutely no reason to criminalise someone for having sex with anyone who is above the age of consent. If that person is 75, 85 or 105, and they consent to the sex, then to institute the death penalty for this is hilariously irrational. 🤦‍♂️ •‘sex with the disabled and mentally ill’ - lol. If a disabled gay man or woman wants to have sex, where’s the fucking issue? 🤷‍♂️ Death for this? Yer having a fucking larff, aincha? 🤦‍♂️ Obviously, the mentally ill could be compromised when it comes to consent, so this needs sensitivity. •‘homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality’ - so, if someone has been convicted just once for, say, giving a BJ (which isn’t actually a ‘homosexual act’, as we’ve established there is no such thing) to his partner, and he’s caught doing it again, you kill him? Really? 🤦‍♂️ When you look closely at the Bill, it becomes increasingly ridiculous and barely believable that in 2024 we are criminalising people for simply having consensual adult sex. 🤦‍♂️
    2
  10844. 2
  10845. 2
  10846. 2
  10847. 2
  10848. 2
  10849. 2
  10850. 2
  10851. 2
  10852. 2
  10853. 2
  10854. 2
  10855. 2
  10856. 2
  10857. 2
  10858. 2
  10859. 2
  10860. 2
  10861. 2
  10862. 2
  10863. 2
  10864. 2
  10865. 2
  10866. 2
  10867. 2
  10868. 2
  10869. 2
  10870. 2
  10871. 2
  10872. 2
  10873. 2
  10874. 2
  10875. 2
  10876. 2
  10877. 2
  10878. 2
  10879. 2
  10880. 2
  10881. 2
  10882. 2
  10883. 2
  10884. 2
  10885. 2
  10886. 2
  10887. 2
  10888. 2
  10889. 2
  10890. 2
  10891. 2
  10892. 2
  10893. 2
  10894. 2
  10895. 2
  10896. 2
  10897. 2
  10898. 2
  10899. 2
  10900. 2
  10901. 2
  10902. 2
  10903. 2
  10904. 2
  10905. 2
  10906. 2
  10907. 2
  10908. 2
  10909. 2
  10910. 2
  10911. 2
  10912. 2
  10913. 2
  10914. 2
  10915. 2
  10916. ⁠​​⁠​​⁠​​⁠​​⁠Why should anyone be taking lessons in anything (let alone telling consenting f*cking adults what they can and cannot do and with whom in the bedroom!🤦‍♂️) from a corrupt, tin-pot dictator presiding over a corrupt, tin-pot poverty-blasted country? There is a reason why great waves of African migrants seek a better life elsewhere. They are leaving a continent which has, historically, not pulled its weight (and continues to not pull its weight) on the world stage to go to other more enlightened, more prosperous, freer places. A good indicator of this situation is if we take a look at all the key inventions/discoveries humanity has attained, virtually none of them are out of Africa. See? Not pulling and continuing to not pull its weight. ​​⁠1. The wheel. (Sumerians) 2. Printing press. (Gutenberg - German) 3. Penicillin. (Fleming - Scottish) 4. Compass. (Chinese) 5. Light bulb. (Edison - American) 6. Telephone. (Graham Bell - Scottish) 7. Television. (Logie Baird - Scottish) 8. Internal combustion engine. (Étienne Lenoir - French) 9. The pill. (Pincus/Rock - American) 10. Internet. (Berners-Lee - English) 11. Concrete. (Nabataeans) 12. Telescope. (Lippershey - Dutch) 13. Batteries. (Volta - Italian) 14. Aeroplane. (Wright brothers - American) 15. Fridge. (Wolf - American) 16. Nuclear energy. (Fermi - Italian) 17. Vaccines. (Jenner - English) 18. X-rays. (Röntgen - German) 19. Cars. (Benz - German) 20. Radio. (Marconi - Italian) 21. Anaesthetics. (Morton - American) 22. Genetics. (Mendel - Austrian) 23. Computer. (Babbage - English) 24. Paper. (Ts'ai Lun - Chinese) 25. Steam engine. (Watt - Scottish) 26. Electricity. (Benjamin Franklin - American) 27. Steel. (Henry Bessemer - English) 28. Hindu-Arabic numeral system. (India) 29. Remote communication. (Samuel Morse - American) 30. Pasteurisation. (Louis Pasteur - French) 31. The scientific method. (Francis Bacon - English) 32. Flush toilet. (John Harrington - English) 33. Sailboat. (Mesopotamia) 34. Calculus. (Issac Newton - English/Gottfried Leibniz - German) 35. Copernican theory. (Nicolaus Copernicus - Polish) 36. Gravity. (Isaac Newton - English) 37. Theory of evolution. (Charles Darwin - English) 38. Double-entry accounting. (Luca Pacioli - Italian) 39. Mirror. (Justus von Liebig - German) 40. Electric motor. (Thomas Davenport - American) 41. GPS. (Bradford Parkinson - American) 42. DNA double-helix. (Franklin/Crick/Watson - American/English) 43. Prozac. (Klaus Schmiegel - German) 44. Industrial robot. (George Devol - American) 45. LED (Nick Holonyak - American) 46. Drones. (Abraham Karem - Iraq) 47. Digital music. (James Russell - American) 48. MRI. (Raymond Damadian - American) 49. Genetic sequencing. (Fredrick Sanger - English) 50. Rubber. (Charles Goodyear - American)
    2
  10917. 2
  10918. 2
  10919. 2
  10920. 2
  10921. 2
  10922. 2
  10923. The Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Act (2023) prescribes up to twenty years in prison for ‘promotion of homosexuality’, life imprisonment for ‘homosexual acts’, and the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’. 1. How, exactly, can you ‘promote’ homosexuality? This isn’t about trying to persuade people to become gay, as if you are trying to persuade people to vote for you, or persuade people to buy a new whizz-bang, fancy-pants vibrator (ijumpjudy has just put in her order - extra batteries included 😉); that’s impossible. It’s not like you can ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. So, primitively prescribing 20 years imprisonment for something you either are or aren’t no matter how much ‘promoting’ is done is bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ 2. There are no such things as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’. If this term refers to anal/oral sex, then, spoiler alert: millions of heterosexuals engage in these acts, too, so to describe them as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’ makes zero sense. Even if we accept that giving/receiving a BJ or having anal sex is a ‘homosexual act’, you’re really going to imprison someone for life for this? 🤦‍♂️ 3. ‘Aggravated homosexuality’ has the death penalty as its punishment and is described as an offence including ‘serial offenders, same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality.’ Ok, let’s break this down: •‘serial offenders’ - presumably this means people who just have consenting sex on many occasions. Death for this? 🤦‍♂️ •‘same-sex rape’ - as with heterosexual rape, this should obviously be criminalised, but I wouldn’t support death for it. •‘sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation’ - in the case of a position of authority, if the other person consents to the sex, I see no issue with it. If intimidation is involved and no consent given, then this should be criminalised. •‘sex with persons older than 75’ - lol. I see absolutely no reason to criminalise someone for having sex with anyone who is above the age of consent. If that person is 75, 85 or 105, and they consent to the sex, then to institute the death penalty for this is hilariously irrational. 🤦‍♂️ •‘sex with the disabled and mentally ill’ - lol. If a disabled gay man or woman wants to have sex, where’s the fucking issue? 🤷‍♂️ Death for this? Yer having a fucking larff, aincha? 🤦‍♂️ Obviously, the mentally ill could be compromised when it comes to consent, so this needs sensitivity. •‘homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality’ - so, if someone has been convicted just once for, say, giving a BJ (which isn’t actually a ‘homosexual act’, as we’ve established there is no such thing) to his partner, and he’s caught doing it again, you kill him? Really? 🤦‍♂️ When you look closely at the Bill, it becomes increasingly ridiculous and barely believable that in 2024 we are criminalising people for simply having consensual adult sex. 🤦‍♂️
    2
  10924. 2
  10925. 2
  10926. 2
  10927. 2
  10928. 2
  10929. 2
  10930. 2
  10931. 2
  10932. 2
  10933. 2
  10934. 2
  10935. 2
  10936. 2
  10937. There is a direct correlation between countries which belong to the Commonwealth, and therefore have previously been under British rule, and countries that still have homophobic biphobic and/or transphobic legislature in their constitutions. 25% of the world’s population (2.4 billion people) currently live in a country belonging to the Commonwealth, however they make up a disproportionately large 50 per cent of countries that still criminalise homosexuality. There are currently 64 countries (out of 195) in the world that criminalise homosexuality. Of these 64, almost half (29) belong to the Commonwealth. Africa Algeria Cameroon ✅ Chad Comoros Egypt Eritrea Eswatini (Swaziland) ✅ Ethiopia Gambia ✅ Ghana ✅ Guinea Kenya ✅ Liberia Libya Malawi ✅ Mauritania Morocco Nigeria ✅ Senegal Sierra Leone ✅ Somalia South Sudan Sudan Tanzania Togo ✅ Tunisia Uganda ✅ Zambia ✅ Zimbabwe ✅ Asia, including the Middle East Afghanistan Bangladesh ✅ Brunei ✅ Indonesia Iran Iraq Kuwait Lebanon Malaysia ✅ Maldives ✅ Myanmar Oman Pakistan ✅ Palestine Qatar Saudi Arabia Sri Lanka ✅ Syria Turkmenistan United Arab Emirates Uzbekistan Yemen Americas Grenada ✅ Guyana ✅ Jamaica ✅ St Lucia ✅ St Vincent & the Grenadines ✅ Oceania Kiribati ✅ Niue Papua New Guinea ✅ Samoa ✅ Solomon Islands ✅ Tonga ✅ Tuvalu ✅ ✅ Commonwealth member The vast majority of the remaining 64 are majority Islamic. What does this prove? Well, organised religion plays a vital role in the criminalisation of homosexuality. However, the key takeaway for the purposes of this video, is that in Uganda, prior to the widespread introduction of Christianity (Uganda is currently 84% Christian/14% Muslim) homosexuality was largely tolerated and not legislated for within the various tribal denominations. At worst, in most cases, it was merely ignored. Yet here we have Museveni telling the ‘evil West’ to butt-out, when the criminalisation of homosexuality was brought in directly on the back of a Bible (…and a Quran!) by a bunch of Westerners! Hypocrisy? 🤦‍♂️
    2
  10938. 2
  10939. 2
  10940. 2
  10941. 2
  10942. 2
  10943. 2
  10944. 2
  10945. 2
  10946. 2
  10947. 2
  10948. 2
  10949. 2
  10950. 2
  10951. 2
  10952. 2
  10953. 2
  10954. 2
  10955. 2
  10956. 2
  10957. 2
  10958. 2
  10959. 2
  10960. 2
  10961. 2
  10962. 2
  10963. 2
  10964. 2
  10965. 2
  10966. 2
  10967. 2
  10968. 2
  10969. 2
  10970. 2
  10971. 2
  10972. 2
  10973. 2
  10974. 2
  10975. 2
  10976. 2
  10977. 2
  10978. 2
  10979. 2
  10980. 2
  10981. 2
  10982. 2
  10983. 2
  10984. 2
  10985. 2
  10986. 2
  10987. 2
  10988. 2
  10989. 2
  10990. 2
  10991. 2
  10992. 2
  10993. 2
  10994. 2
  10995. 2
  10996. 2
  10997. 2
  10998. 2
  10999. 2
  11000. 2
  11001. 2
  11002. 2
  11003. 2
  11004. 2
  11005. 2
  11006. 2
  11007. 2
  11008. 2
  11009. 2
  11010. 2
  11011. 2
  11012. 2
  11013. 2
  11014. 2
  11015. 2
  11016. 2
  11017. 2
  11018. 2
  11019. 2
  11020. 2
  11021. 2
  11022. 2
  11023. 2
  11024. 2
  11025. 2
  11026. 2
  11027. 2
  11028. 2
  11029. 2
  11030. 2
  11031. 2
  11032. 2
  11033. 2
  11034. 2
  11035. 2
  11036. 2
  11037. 2
  11038. 2
  11039. 2
  11040. 2
  11041. 2
  11042. 2
  11043. 2
  11044. 2
  11045. 2
  11046. 2
  11047. 2
  11048. 2
  11049. 2
  11050. 2
  11051. 2
  11052. 2
  11053. 2
  11054. 2
  11055. 2
  11056. 2
  11057. 2
  11058. 2
  11059. 2
  11060. 2
  11061. 2
  11062. 2
  11063. 2
  11064. 2
  11065. 2
  11066. 2
  11067. 2
  11068. 2
  11069. 2
  11070. 2
  11071. 2
  11072. 2
  11073. 2
  11074. 2
  11075. 2
  11076. 2
  11077. 2
  11078. 2
  11079. 2
  11080. 2
  11081. 2
  11082. 2
  11083. US invades China 1945-46 - OK US invades Korea 1950-53 - OK US invades China (again) 1950-53 - OK US invades Guatemala 1954 - OK US invades Indonesia 1958 - OK US invades Cuba 1959-60 - OK US invades Guatemala (again) 1960 - OK US invades Belgian Congo 1964 - OK US invades Guatemala ( yet again) 1964 - OK US invades Dominican Republic 1965-66 - OK US invades Peru 1965 - OK US invades Laos 1964-73 - OK US invades Vietnam 1961-73 - OK US invades Cambodia 1969-70 - OK US invades Guatemala (and yet again) 1967-69 - OK US invades Lebanon 1982-84 - OK US invades Grenada 1983-84 - OK US invades Libya 1986 - OK US invades El Salvador 1981-92 - OK US invades Nicaragua 1981-90 - OK US invades Iran 1987-88 - OK US invades Libya (again) 1989 - OK US invades Panama 1989-90 - OK US invades Iraq 1991 - OK US invades Kuwait 1991 - OK US invades Somalia 1992-94 - OK US invades Bosnia 1995 - OK US invades Iran 1998 - OK US invades Sudan 1998 - OK US invades Afghanistan 1998 - OK US invades Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999 - OK US invades Afghanistan (again) 2001 - OK US invades Libya (yet again) 2011 - OK US invades Iraq (again) and Syria 2014 – OK US invades Somalia 2011 – OK US invades Iran 2020 – OK Russia invades Ukraine 2022 - not OK This list doesn’t include the dozens of other sovereign nations in which the US has interfered in the internal affairs of by overthrowing democratically-elected governments and installing proxies favourable to US/western interests. Including in 2014 in Ukraine itself. Also, I don’t condone Putin’s actions in Ukraine one iota. However, he is doing precisely nothing America and her partners haven’t been doing for decades. It constantly bemuses me how the west completely and utterly ignores the buckets of foreign blood they have spilt, while pointing the finger at the likes of Putin. The double standards hypocrisy is staggering as Putin is merely apeing the geopolitical modus operandi of the west and simply playing the tune it has been playing since at least 1492. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
    2
  11084. Peace talks in a fantasy world Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Ok, we want Russia to de-nuclearise and committed to not militarising the Russia/Ukraine border.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “We want Russia disarmed to ensure no threat to Ukraine (or anyone else)” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want protection for the Ukrainian language in eastern Ukraine.” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want Russia to emerge from communist dictatorship and come into the light of free, liberal democracies.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “We want Moscow and St Petersburg to be recognised as free Ukrainian cities.” Peace talks in the real world Putin: Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “Done.” Moral of story: Sometimes bullies just get a little of what they want, but never mess with someone by pitching up at their home expecting to take it forcibly, for as Dustin Hoffman going apeshit in Strawdogs has shown: you are unlikely to win.
    2
  11085. 2
  11086. 2
  11087. 2
  11088. 2
  11089. 2
  11090. 2
  11091. 2
  11092. 2
  11093. 2
  11094. 2
  11095. 2
  11096. 2
  11097. 2
  11098. 2
  11099. 2
  11100. 2
  11101. 2
  11102. 2
  11103. 2
  11104. 2
  11105. 2
  11106. 2
  11107. 2
  11108. 2
  11109. 2
  11110. 2
  11111. 2
  11112. 2
  11113. 2
  11114. 2
  11115. 2
  11116. 2
  11117. 2
  11118. 2
  11119. 2
  11120. 2
  11121. 2
  11122. 2
  11123. 2
  11124. 2
  11125. 2
  11126. 2
  11127. 2
  11128. 2
  11129. The rest of the world looks on this and weeps. Why do so many other developed nations not have America’s baleful gun culture? Germany, the UK, Japan, for example, don’t seem to have this terrible issue with gun crime, and yet there is relative peace in terms of general society, and certainly mass killings are rare. America needs to seriously look at its Second Amendment. There are only three countries that have a constitutional right to keep and bear arms: Mexico, Guatemala, and the United States. Although Mexico and Guatemala both have a constitutional right to bear arms, the US is in a league of its own simply because it is the only country without restrictions on gun ownership in its constitution. After the Second Amendment was adopted in 1791, it inspired other countries around the world to provide their citizens with the right to own guns. However, only 15 constitutions (in nine countries) ever included an explicit right to bear arms. They are Bolivia, Costa Rica, Colombia, Honduras, Nicaragua, Liberia, Guatemala, Mexico, and the US. All of those countries, excluding Mexico, the US, and Guatemala, have since rescinded the constitutional right to bear arms. So, America is the outlier here in terms of citizens’ rights to bear arms. Does it want to continue this, and put up with its horrible mass killings? Or does it want to consider repealing the Second Amendment, thereby allowing the average American citizen to breathe that much easier in the ‘land of the free’?
    2
  11130. 2
  11131. 2
  11132. 2
  11133. 2
  11134. 2
  11135. 2
  11136. 2
  11137. 2
  11138. 2
  11139. 2
  11140. 2
  11141. 2
  11142. 2
  11143. 2
  11144. 2
  11145. 2
  11146. 2
  11147. 2
  11148. 2
  11149. 2
  11150. 2
  11151. 2
  11152. 2
  11153. 2
  11154. 2
  11155. 2
  11156. 2
  11157. 2
  11158. 2
  11159. 2
  11160. 2
  11161. 2
  11162. 2
  11163. 2
  11164. 2
  11165. 2
  11166. 2
  11167. 2
  11168. 2
  11169. 2
  11170. Peace talks in a fantasy world Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Ok, we want Russia to de-nuclearise and committed to not militarising the Russia/Ukraine border.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “We want Russia disarmed to ensure no threat to Ukraine (or anyone else)” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want protection for the Ukrainian language in eastern Ukraine.” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want Russia to emerge from communist dictatorship and come into the light of free, liberal democracies.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “We want Moscow and St Petersburg to be recognised as free Ukrainian cities.” Peace talks in the real world Putin: Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “Done.” Moral of story: Sometimes bullies just get a little of what they want, but never mess with someone by pitching up at their home expecting to take it forcibly, for as Dustin Hoffman going apeshit in Strawdogs has shown: you are unlikely to win.
    2
  11171. 2
  11172. 2
  11173. US invades China 1945-46 - OK US invades Korea 1950-53 - OK US invades China (again) 1950-53 - OK US invades Guatemala 1954 - OK US invades Indonesia 1958 - OK US invades Cuba 1959-60 - OK US invades Guatemala (again) 1960 - OK US invades Belgian Congo 1964 - OK US invades Guatemala ( yet again) 1964 - OK US invades Dominican Republic 1965-66 - OK US invades Peru 1965 - OK US invades Laos 1964-73 - OK US invades Vietnam 1961-73 - OK US invades Cambodia 1969-70 - OK US invades Guatemala (and yet again) 1967-69 - OK US invades Lebanon 1982-84 - OK US invades Grenada 1983-84 - OK US invades Libya 1986 - OK US invades El Salvador 1981-92 - OK US invades Nicaragua 1981-90 - OK US invades Iran 1987-88 - OK US invades Libya (again) 1989 - OK US invades Panama 1989-90 - OK US invades Iraq 1991 - OK US invades Kuwait 1991 - OK US invades Somalia 1992-94 - OK US invades Bosnia 1995 - OK US invades Iran 1998 - OK US invades Sudan 1998 - OK US invades Afghanistan 1998 - OK US invades Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999 - OK US invades Afghanistan (again) 2001 - OK US invades Libya (yet again) 2011 - OK US invades Iraq (again) and Syria 2014 – OK US invades Somalia 2011 – OK US invades Iran 2020 – OK Russia invades Ukraine 2022 - not OK This list doesn’t include the dozens of other sovereign nations in which the US has interfered in the internal affairs of by overthrowing democratically-elected governments and installing proxies favourable to US/western interests. Including in 2014 in Ukraine itself. Also, I don’t condone Putin’s actions in Ukraine one iota. However, he is doing precisely nothing America and her partners haven’t been doing for decades. It constantly bemuses me how the west completely and utterly ignores the buckets of foreign blood they have spilt, while pointing the finger at the likes of Putin. The double standards hypocrisy is staggering as Putin is merely apeing the geopolitical modus operandi of the west and simply playing the tune it has been playing since at least 1492. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
    2
  11174. 2
  11175. 2
  11176. 2
  11177. 2
  11178. 2
  11179. 2
  11180. 2
  11181. US invades China 1945-46 - OK US invades Korea 1950-53 - OK US invades China (again) 1950-53 - OK US invades Guatemala 1954 - OK US invades Indonesia 1958 - OK US invades Cuba 1959-60 - OK US invades Guatemala (again) 1960 - OK US invades Belgian Congo 1964 - OK US invades Guatemala ( yet again) 1964 - OK US invades Dominican Republic 1965-66 - OK US invades Peru 1965 - OK US invades Laos 1964-73 - OK US invades Vietnam 1961-73 - OK US invades Cambodia 1969-70 - OK US invades Guatemala (and yet again) 1967-69 - OK US invades Lebanon 1982-84 - OK US invades Grenada 1983-84 - OK US invades Libya 1986 - OK US invades El Salvador 1981-92 - OK US invades Nicaragua 1981-90 - OK US invades Iran 1987-88 - OK US invades Libya (again) 1989 - OK US invades Panama 1989-90 - OK US invades Iraq 1991 - OK US invades Kuwait 1991 - OK US invades Somalia 1992-94 - OK US invades Bosnia 1995 - OK US invades Iran 1998 - OK US invades Sudan 1998 - OK US invades Afghanistan 1998 - OK US invades Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999 - OK US invades Afghanistan (again) 2001 - OK US invades Libya (yet again) 2011 - OK US invades Iraq (again) and Syria 2014 – OK US invades Somalia 2011 – OK US invades Iran 2020 – OK Russia invades Ukraine 2022 - not OK This list doesn’t include the dozens of other sovereign nations in which the US has interfered in the internal affairs of by overthrowing democratically-elected governments and installing proxies favourable to US/western interests. Including in 2014 in Ukraine itself. Also, I don’t condone Putin’s actions in Ukraine one iota. However, he is doing precisely nothing America and her partners haven’t been doing for decades. It constantly bemuses me how the west completely and utterly ignores the buckets of foreign blood they have spilt, while pointing the finger at the likes of Putin. The double standards hypocrisy is staggering as Putin is merely apeing the geopolitical modus operandi of the west and simply playing the tune it has been playing since at least 1492. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
    2
  11182. 2
  11183. 2
  11184. 2
  11185. 2
  11186. 2
  11187. 2
  11188. 2
  11189. 2
  11190. 2
  11191. 2
  11192. 2
  11193. 2
  11194. 2
  11195. 2
  11196. 2
  11197. 2
  11198. 2
  11199. 2
  11200. 2
  11201. 2
  11202. 2
  11203. 2
  11204. 2
  11205. 2
  11206. 2
  11207. 2
  11208. 2
  11209. 2
  11210. 2
  11211. 2
  11212. 2
  11213. 2
  11214. 2
  11215. 2
  11216. 2
  11217. 2
  11218. 2
  11219. 2
  11220. 2
  11221. 2
  11222. 2
  11223. 2
  11224. 2
  11225. 2
  11226. 2
  11227. 2
  11228. 2
  11229. 2
  11230. 2
  11231. 2
  11232. 2
  11233. 2
  11234. 2
  11235. 2
  11236. 2
  11237. 2
  11238. 2
  11239. 2
  11240. 2
  11241. 2
  11242. 2
  11243. 2
  11244. 2
  11245. 2
  11246. 2
  11247. 2
  11248. 2
  11249. 2
  11250. 2
  11251. 2
  11252. 2
  11253. 2
  11254. 2
  11255. 2
  11256. 2
  11257. 2
  11258. 2
  11259. 2
  11260. 2
  11261. 2
  11262. 2
  11263. 2
  11264. 2
  11265. 2
  11266. 2
  11267. 2
  11268. 2
  11269. 2
  11270. 2
  11271. 2
  11272. 2
  11273. 2
  11274. 2
  11275. 2
  11276. 2
  11277. 2
  11278. 2
  11279. 2
  11280. 2
  11281. 2
  11282. 2
  11283. 2
  11284. 2
  11285. 2
  11286. 2
  11287. 2
  11288. 2
  11289. 2
  11290. 2
  11291. 2
  11292. 2
  11293. 2
  11294. 2
  11295. 2
  11296. 2
  11297. 2
  11298. 2
  11299. If you ask me why , from me to you , on the long and winding road of life as we travel across the universe , you have to think for yourself for tomorrow never knows . What goes on is on the tip of my tongue , while the fool on the hill for whom happiness is a warm gun , is a nowhere man . A day in the life can mean misery for many as your mother should know . You know what to do , what goes on when in spite of all the danger you seek the inner light . For today, here comes the sun , and you have a ticket to ride , and that means a lot . Now and then we need a revolution where we twist and shout and everything feels like a helter skelter . Yesterday has gone; like being back in the USSR , but that was then and I’m glad it’s all over . The magical mystery tour of life you embrace as like a little child where you feel as a child of nature . If the taxman knocks run for your life , for he can’t let it be . Do you want to know a secret? . For the day tripper(s) amongst you, the beautiful dreamer (s), know that all things must pass . You may be crying, waiting, hoping , for everything to come together in your golden slumbers , or you may carry that weight , through the rain , but if you’ve got trouble , always remember Lucy in the sky with diamonds or a little junk , and soon you’ll be glad it’s all over . Every little thing is all part of the walk . Wait , tell me what you see ? A blackbird from a window . Like it you are free as a bird . So if at anytime at all you see a world without love , here, there and everywhere , and it’s all too much , and a day in the life feels like eight days a week , know that there’s a place called the end .
    2
  11300. 2
  11301. 2
  11302. 2
  11303. 2
  11304. 2
  11305. 2
  11306. 2
  11307. 2
  11308. 2
  11309. 2
  11310. 2
  11311. 2
  11312. 2
  11313. 2
  11314. 2
  11315. 2
  11316. 2
  11317. 2
  11318. 2
  11319. 2
  11320. 2
  11321. 2
  11322. 2
  11323. 2
  11324. 2
  11325. 2
  11326. 2
  11327. 2
  11328. 2
  11329. 2
  11330. 2
  11331. 2
  11332. 2
  11333. 2
  11334. 2
  11335. 2
  11336. 2
  11337. 2
  11338. 2
  11339. 2
  11340. 2
  11341. 2
  11342. 2
  11343. 2
  11344. 2
  11345. 2
  11346. 2
  11347. 2
  11348. 2
  11349. 2
  11350. 2
  11351. 2
  11352. 2
  11353. 2
  11354. 2
  11355. 2
  11356. 2
  11357. 2
  11358. 2
  11359. 2
  11360. 2
  11361. 2
  11362. 2
  11363. 2
  11364. 2
  11365. 2
  11366. 2
  11367. 2
  11368. 2
  11369. 2
  11370. 2
  11371. 2
  11372. 2
  11373. 2
  11374. US invades China 1945-46 - OK US invades Korea 1950-53 - OK US invades China (again) 1950-53 - OK US invades Guatemala 1954 - OK US invades Indonesia 1958 - OK US invades Cuba 1959-60 - OK US invades Guatemala (again) 1960 - OK US invades Belgian Congo 1964 - OK US invades Guatemala ( yet again) 1964 - OK US invades Dominican Republic 1965-66 - OK US invades Peru 1965 - OK US invades Laos 1964-73 - OK US invades Vietnam 1961-73 - OK US invades Cambodia 1969-70 - OK US invades Guatemala (and yet again) 1967-69 - OK US invades Lebanon 1982-84 - OK US invades Grenada 1983-84 - OK US invades Libya 1986 - OK US invades El Salvador 1981-92 - OK US invades Nicaragua 1981-90 - OK US invades Iran 1987-88 - OK US invades Libya (again) 1989 - OK US invades Panama 1989-90 - OK US invades Iraq 1991 - OK US invades Kuwait 1991 - OK US invades Somalia 1992-94 - OK US invades Bosnia 1995 - OK US invades Iran 1998 - OK US invades Sudan 1998 - OK US invades Afghanistan 1998 - OK US invades Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999 - OK US invades Afghanistan (again) 2001 - OK US invades Libya (yet again) 2011 - OK US invades Iraq (again) and Syria 2014 – OK US invades Somalia 2011 – OK US invades Iran 2020 – OK Russia invades Ukraine 2022 - not OK This list doesn’t include the dozens of other sovereign nations in which the US has interfered in the internal affairs of by overthrowing democratically-elected governments and installing proxies favourable to US/western interests. Including in 2014 in Ukraine itself. Also, I don’t condone Putin’s actions in Ukraine one iota. However, he is doing precisely nothing America and her partners haven’t been doing for decades. It constantly bemuses me how the west completely and utterly ignores the buckets of foreign blood they have spilt, while pointing the finger at the likes of Putin. The double standards hypocrisy is staggering as Putin is merely apeing the geopolitical modus operandi of the west and simply playing the tune it has been playing since at least 1492. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
    2
  11375. 2
  11376. 2
  11377. 2
  11378. 2
  11379. 2
  11380. 2
  11381. 2
  11382. 2
  11383. 2
  11384. 2
  11385. 2
  11386. 2
  11387. 2
  11388. I feel it’s important to put the non-meat eating case here, as while Leo has some fun with this lady, it’s an important issue for us all. For full disclosure, I eat fish and occasionally some meat, so I’m in no way coming at this as an ardent vegetarian/vegan. I just felt it important to lay out, as objectively as possible, the case for vegetarianism. One of the major arguments that killing animals for food is wrong is that animals are actually incredibly sentient and remarkably intelligent. Animal welfare, therefore, should be a major concern of humans. While animals might not have achieved the same level of community or civilization that humanity has (and while yes, they are below humans in the food chain), this should not diminish their intelligence and their ability to feel. Animals not only feel pain but have memories, family connections, and connections to humans too. We see some animals (such as dogs or cats) as worthy of our protection, whereas other animals of equal intelligence, such as pigs, are killed for food. The reality is that humans have distanced themselves from their own food chain, and therefore from the suffering caused to animals through meat-eating. We see eating meat as a human tradition; however, we are no longer hunter-gatherers living off the odd animal that happens to cross our paths. The meat industry has been industrialized, and it uses masses of land, grain, and water to produce meat for our supermarket shelves. The problem is that with more meat-eaters, the land where beef can be reared or where chickens or pigs are kept is fast diminishing. The argument is that raising meat for slaughter is simply not sustainable because it’s inefficient. Beef is the worst culprit, and the amount of food and water that goes into its production could be used to produce a higher quantity of plant-food, which gives humans the same number of calories or nutrients. As the human population increases, this problem will only become more noticeable, as there is more competition for ever scarcer resources. Another environmental argument against meat-eating is the huge contribution livestock has towards CO2 emission. Methane gas is a byproduct of raising animals (particularly cattle), and eating red meat has a large carbon footprint that’s not always obvious to consumers. Cutting down on red meat lowers the demand for meat and can contribute towards a lower carbon footprint and fewer CO2 emissions. Are humans designed to eat meat? In part, we have evolved to eat cooked meat; however, we have also evolved to eat plants. Despite how conditioned we are to consuming meat, our bodies don’t need us to keep eating meat to survive. All observing Hindus and Sikhs, for example, avoid eating meat, and often all animal products altogether. In fact, we can find all of the essential nutrients (including proteins and B12) that we traditionally source from meat in many different plants and plant-based products. For instance, soy is a huge source of plant-based protein. If humans do have dominance over the animals and are top of the food chain, shouldn’t we make a moral decision to help our planet and help our animals? Rather than using our intelligence as a right to kill other creatures, the argument is that we can use our intelligence as a force for positive change and a move towards sustainability and improved animal welfare. Should humans take the moral high ground rather than justifying questionable existing moralities? Perhaps with the onset of lab-grown meat we will be able to continue consuming meat guilt-free. The reality of eating animals is that many of the ethical and moral arguments that defend it are, in fact, rather weak in the face of the pro vegetarianism argument. While sustainable farming practices can eliminate the environmental arguments against meat-eating, you still have the cost factors to consider and the morality of killing animals. The tradition argument has no real logical basis either; after all, just because humans have been doing something for millennia doesn’t make it the right thing to do (you can justify slavery with this very same argument). Ultimately though, the question of should I eat meat is currently a personal one. We each have our own belief systems, our own reason(s) to not eat meat or to eat meat. However, with an ever-crowded world and shrinking resources, environmental factors may prove to be an overpowering argument for plant-based diets in the future. The key for me in all this is education. People should be free to make up their own minds and not coerced one way or the other. 🐮
    2
  11389. Always mistrusted overtly ‘political’ comedy of any stripe. Never understood this human compulsion many seem to have to put all their political eggs into a single basket. When I assess my views on each given topic I find I am ‘liberal’ in some, ‘green’ in others, ‘conservative’ in more and ‘socialist’ in a few. The rest I haven’t made my mind up yet. Blake’s dictum I always have in mind here when it comes to these things which, for me, are under constant review: The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind. Or even better, this from Emerson, which captures perfectly the predicament of those toeing a party line, come what may: A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood. Or this from the glorious Whitman: Do I contradict myself?/Very well then I contradict myself/I am large, I contain multitudes.) To bind yourself to ideas one day, and then to be doomed to defend them come what may, is not worthy of the thinking human being.😳
    2
  11390. 2
  11391. @0:49 It was an unpaid debt the UK owed Iran; Kearse conveniently omits to mention this key point. @0:55 So only working-class people go on hunger-strikes? Staggering inverted snobbery. @1:15 Kearse again talks of the £400 million pounds like it was a ransom; it wasn’t; to repeat, it was a debt we hadn’t paid for 44 years, and although this was unable to be paid due to EU sanctions relating to Iranian nuclear weapons, this doesn’t absolve the UK of money they should have returned to Iran at the earliest opportunity decades ago. @1:53 For the third time Kearse talks of the money as a kind of ransom; it wasn’t, but that for him to admit that would be to let the facts get in the way of his tendentious narrative. @2:32 Yes, she was kidnapped by Iran but they made it explicitly clear from the outset that the price of her release would be the money the UK owed Iran; so, technically she’s being held in Iran, but because the UK didn’t pay a debt they should have decades ago, and if they had paid this debt, she would have been released. Ergo, the UK is actually very culpable here. @6:19 I think that’s the 5th time Kearse repeats this as if it wasn’t money we already owed the Iranians - it’s a bit like me lending Kearse hundred quid back in the day, requesting my loan back, him refusing, so I kidnap his mother until he pays me what I’m due. If he pays me my money back, he can have his mother back. Simple. @6:30 Yes, but why Leo? You’re really not very good at this, are you? @6:52 And again. @7:18 Wow! Spectacular case of patronising your audience there, Leo. You might not know what Farsi is, but don’t presume that for the rest of us. @7:32 Hypocrite alert! ‘Classism’ in others, when Kearse has just laid into Zaghari-Ratcliffe’s husband for his ‘fast’. Pot, kettle, black doesn’t cover it. @10:14 This point is Kearse’s Achilles Heel; with a script he’s like a C-rate Frankie Boyle without the real insight; on GB News he comes across as laboured, uninformed and clearly not able to operate well without a script; ad-libbing wittily seems to be beyond him. Even on stage he embarrassingly reads about 10 minutes of a routine which is on YouTube; someone with 23 other hours in the day who can’t be arsed learning his lines smacks of laziness at best, cocky arrogance at worst.
    2
  11392. 2
  11393. 2
  11394. 2
  11395. 2
  11396. 2
  11397. 2
  11398. 2
  11399. 2
  11400. 2
  11401. 2
  11402. 2
  11403. 2
  11404. 2
  11405. 2
  11406. 2
  11407. 2
  11408. 2
  11409. 2
  11410. 2
  11411. 2
  11412. 2
  11413. 2
  11414. 2
  11415. 2
  11416. 2
  11417. 2
  11418. 2
  11419. 2
  11420.  @satanicbbc5090  Wow! You got some serious sh*t going on there, man. Ok, deep breath: When you say Icke is an ‘obvious controlled opposition’, I have no idea what you are on about. Who is ‘controlling’ him and what is he ‘opposing’? Before you answer these questions you need to think about the credible evidence you’re going to supply, and not just assert stuff willy-nilly, because I don’t operate like that. ‘Every single BBC presenter looks like a transgender’. Well now. Even accepting your dubious assumption that there is a transgender ‘look’ we can all agree upon, how about I throw out a few names at complete random as they pop into my head: Dan Walker; Naga Munchetty; Jane Hill; Kirsty Wark; Huw Edwards; Martine Croxall; Fiona Bruce; Sophie Rayworth; Victoria Coren Mitchell. Ok, with the best will in the world I look at every one of these people and to me they look to a man and a woman what they are. In other words, I have no idea wtf you are on about when you say every BBC presenter looks transgender. To then state with no apparent shame that this is ‘scientifically observable’ is clearly patent nonsense, and I suspect you may know this, notwithstanding your apparent ingenuousness. But here is my main point: every single BBC presenter is transgender. So what? As to Icke himself? To me he just looks like any other ordinary middle-aged bloke. The reason I suspect Icke has undergone certain mind-expanding experiences is quite simply I speak from direct experience here, and when he discusses some of this stuff it chimes remarkably closely to what I underwent. As to Icke’s family ‘looking transgender’, well, let’s see: Gareth - from the pictures I have seen he appears to look like an everyday bloke. Ditto Jaymie. Similarly, his daughters look like ordinary women. Your point about certain religions and genital mutilation I concur with and I, personally, abhor the practices, if they are done without the consent of those being operated on. To then bring in the BBC on this theme? No idea again wtf you’re on about. Asserting stuff without corroborating evidence doesn’t cut it with me as I’m sure you’ll have gathered by now. I agree that media and entertainment have an influence on our behaviours but I, for one, don’t feel unduly ‘manipulated’. If you do, then that’s your issue. Your penultimate point just sounded like the ramblings of a pub bore so I’ll skip that. Your final 3 points are simply incorrect. 3 of my close family are in the medical profession and I can assure you there are such things as ‘viruses’. You are free to believe what you want. Nuclear weapons exist as I’m sure you’ve seen the Hiroshima/Nagasaki bombings and their aftermath. Again, if you reject this credible evidence you are free to do so. Space exploration again gives us overwhelming evidence that this has occurred and continues. If you choose to refute this, that is your prerogative.
    2
  11421. 2
  11422. 2
  11423. 2
  11424. 2
  11425. 2
  11426. 2
  11427. 2
  11428. 2
  11429. 2
  11430. 2
  11431. 2
  11432. 2
  11433. 2
  11434. 2
  11435. 2
  11436. 2
  11437. 2
  11438. 2
  11439. 2
  11440. 2
  11441. 2
  11442. 2
  11443. 2
  11444. 2
  11445. 2
  11446. 2
  11447. 2
  11448. 2
  11449. 2
  11450. 2
  11451. 2
  11452. 2
  11453. 2
  11454. 2
  11455. 2
  11456. 2
  11457. 2
  11458. 2
  11459. 2
  11460. 2
  11461. 2
  11462. 2
  11463. 2
  11464. 2
  11465. 2
  11466. 2
  11467. 2
  11468. 2
  11469. 2
  11470. 2
  11471. 2
  11472. 2
  11473. 2
  11474. 2
  11475. 2
  11476. 2
  11477. 2
  11478. 2
  11479. 2
  11480. 2
  11481. 2
  11482.  @memeticist  I agree. I’m for controlled immigration, not open door. I said this to someone else, but you can have it too, as this is an important issue of personal freedom that you seem to be blithely ignoring. Here goes: I repeat, if you come to live here, you learn the language, obey the laws and pay your taxes, that’s all I ask of you, so why are you asking for more than this from me? You call me ‘arrogant’; I’d call you arrogant and presumptuous to assume other people want to think, feel and live as you do. If I'm not harming you, and I’m not, as I’m obeying the law, then where’s the problem?😳 If you think about this a little you’ll see how fascistic it is to demand others conform to your random, arbitrary checklist of ‘how to be’. What are you going to prescribe for me? That I worship your God? What if I’m agnostic? Last time I checked there was such a thing as freedom of religion/worship and freedom to not worship any God(s) at all. Are you going to demand I eat what you eat? Don’t be daft. That’s just hypocritical, as in today’s Britain everyone eats everything anyway, and from all corners of the world as you might have noticed. Are you going to demand I wear what you wear? Really? You’re going to be that authoritarian that you’ll prescribe what I wear? That’s not the sort of society I want to live in. Are you going to tell me what to read, or that I must listen to the music that you like to listen to, or have the same hobbies as you just to make me ‘fit in’ with your staggeringly arrogant rules as to how I should live? Get real. Human beings are more complicated than your cramped Kenland vision of them. You need to think again. I will say this once more, as it bears repeating: if I am speaking the language, paying my taxes and breaking no laws you have absolutely no right to demand anything more of me. You need to deal with this basic fact of freedom in a pluralistic society. If you can’t then that’s just tough. Go and create your own Kenland republic if you must; just know that I won’t be joining you. You sound far too narrow to me, only wanting ‘people like you’ surrounding you; only people speaking with the same accent as you. I’ve lived in several other countries and travelled extensively in every continent, learning to speak 4 other languages along with my native language, and in not one of the places I visited/lived, did I do any more than I ask of others: language, law, taxes. You need to get over a random, arbitrary accident of birth as a marker of your identity. It means nothing. And if you’re going to mould your being to an accident of birth, fine, you are free to do what the fuck you want within the law, just don’t presume to dictate this for others, as it’s nothing less than a kind of fascism. I don’t know your politics, but I’m willing to bet you’re right-wing. I can usually smell this at 10 paces and I’m scenting that here with you. I’m not going to be told by anyone how I am to live my life if I’m harming no one. How you even feel you have the brass neck and temerity that you can demand this of another person in a free society is beyond me. It’s also mighty sinister, so think on. First and foremost, I’m a free-thinking, free-feeling, autonomous human being. I would not dream of arrogantly, haughtily, fascistically asking any other person to change their behaviour/way of life just to suit me. If I invite you to my home, all I ask is that you are polite (obey the laws), try to speak the language therein, and if you’re feeling generous, pop a few pennies into the donation jar. Wear what you want, eat what you want, read what you want, worship whatever God you want, listen to what you want, do what you want, within the law. Given all this, and in conclusion, you need to hold your peace if I’m obeying the law, paying my way and speaking the language. Anything else I’m doing is, quite frankly, none of your fucking business.😳
    2
  11483. 2
  11484. 2
  11485. 2
  11486. @Mcgilead Mcgilead I repeat, if you come to live here, you learn the language, obey the laws and pay your taxes, that’s all I ask of you, so why are you asking for more than this from me? You call me ‘arrogant’; I’d call you arrogant and presumptuous to assume other people want to think, feel and live as you do. If I'm not harming you, and I’m not, as I’m obeying the law, then where’s the problem?😳 If you think about this a little you’ll see how fascistic it is to demand others conform to your random, arbitrary checklist of ‘how to be’. What are you going to prescribe for me? That I worship your God? What if I’m agnostic? Last time I checked there was such a thing as freedom of religion/worship and freedom to not worship any God(s) at all. Are you going to demand I eat what you eat? Don’t be daft. That’s just hypocritical, as in today’s Britain everyone eats everything anyway, and from all corners of the world as you might have noticed. Are you going to demand I wear what you wear? Really? You’re going to be that authoritarian that you’ll prescribe what I wear? That’s not the sort of society I want to live in. Are you going to tell me what to read, or that I must listen to the music that you like to listen to, or have the same hobbies as you just to make me ‘fit in’ with your staggeringly arrogant rules as to how I should live? Get real. Human beings are more complicated than your cramped McGilead vision of them. You need to think again. I will say this once more, as it bears repeating: if I am speaking the language, paying my taxes and breaking no laws you have absolutely no right to demand anything more of me. You need to deal with this basic fact of freedom in a pluralistic society. If you can’t then that’s just tough. Go and create your own McGilead republic if you must; just know that I won’t be joining you. You sound far too narrow to me, only wanting ‘people like you’ surrounding you; only people speaking with the same accent as you. I’ve lived in several other countries and travelled extensively in every continent, learning to speak 4 other languages along with my native language, and in not one of the places I visited/lived, did I do any more than I ask of others: language, law, taxes. You need to get over a random, arbitrary accident of birth as a marker of your identity. It means nothing. And if you’re going to mould your being to an accident of birth, fine, you are free to do what the fuck you want within the law, just don’t presume to dictate this for others, as it’s nothing less than a kind of fascism. I don’t know your politics, but I’m willing to bet you’re right-wing. I can usually smell this at 10 paces and I’m scenting that here with you. I’m not going to be told by anyone how I am to live my life if I’m harming no one. How you even feel you have the brass neck and temerity that you can demand this of another person in a free society is beyond me. It’s also mighty sinister, so think on. First and foremost, I’m a free-thinking, free-feeling, autonomous human being. I would not dream of arrogantly, haughtily, fascistically asking any other person to change their behaviour/way of life just to suit me. If I invite you to my home, all I ask is that you are polite (obey the laws), try to speak the language therein, and if you’re feeling generous, pop a few pennies into the donation jar. Wear what you want, eat what you want, read what you want, worship whatever God you want, listen to what you want, do what you want, within the law. Given all this, and in conclusion, you need to hold your peace if I’m obeying the law, paying my way and speaking the language. Anything else I’m doing is, quite frankly, none of your fucking business.😳
    2
  11487. 2
  11488. 2
  11489. 2
  11490. 2
  11491. 2
  11492. 2
  11493. 2
  11494. 2
  11495. 2
  11496.  @jamesmason8436  Yeah, man. But again you’re missing my point (wilfully or otherwise). If I’d gone to live in Iraq I would have learned Arabic, kept the laws, but not ditched my agnosticism and converted to Islam. If I’d gone to live in India, I would have learned Hindi, obeyed the laws but not chucked my agnosticism to convert to Hinduism. If I had gone to Japan, I would have learned Japanese, kept the laws but not discarded my agnosticism and converted to Shinto. If I had gone to Thailand, I would have learned Thai, kept the laws, but not jettisoned my agnosticism for Buddhism. If I had gone to China, I would have learned Chinese, followed the laws, but not chucked my agnosticism for atheism. Neither, in any of these places would I feel the need (unless I freely wanted to, of course) to bend my very being in a cultural sense to fit some pre-conceived, abstract, nebulous notion of ‘Iraqiness’, ‘Indianness’, ‘Japaneseness’, ‘Thainess’ or ‘Chineseness’. I am a human being, not some robot ready to be culturally moulded to fit some sinister, top-down imposed idea of how I should be when living somewhere, anywhere. Just for the record, in all the places other than the UK I lived in I was able to be an independently-acting, self-contained actor. I don’t identify with a ‘tribe’, and I feel that’s where you and I have our biggest difference. As I see it, you seem to have pretty set notions as to how others should behave (and particularly how they should behave on the patch of land you were randomly, arbitrarily born on). I’m here to tell you that it doesn’t work like that. What’s more, if there is an element of ghettoisation with some Muslims in the UK, then so be it. No one said the world was a clean-lined, perfect sort of place. What are you going to do about it? Force them to live and think as you do? You don’t dig multiculturalism. That’s fine. I just wish you’d been a better-faith player and baldly stated this much sooner. Beyond this there is nothing much more to say as I fear, like planes going around Heathrow after an aborted landing in a storm, we are merely repeating ourselves ad nauseam.😳
    2
  11497. 2
  11498. 2
  11499. 2
  11500. 2
  11501.  @olasmith8132  Get real. I lived in Belgium for 2 years. Beyond speaking French and obeying the law I did nothing consciously to assimilate/integrate. Why do people assume other people should have to radically change their very way of being if they go to live somewhere else? If you’re not harming anyone and, as I say, breaking no laws I argue that you are free to live as you wish. I lived in France for a year. Are you going to force me to sing the Marseillaise and salute the tricolour? No. And that’s as it should be. So why are you asking people who come here that they have to bend every sinew to be some non-existent, abstract version of a ‘Brit’? I was born in the UK. As far as I can see most Muslims who were born here are no less ‘British’ than I am, whatever the fuck that means anyway. I also spent a year in America. I had the language so all I had to do was keep my head down and obey the law. That I did. Now, if you are telling me there are some rogue, some outlying Muslims who come to the UK with nefarious purposes, then, yes, there are. However, there are dubious people from every creed and none, of every race and none, who come here for nefarious purposes. The vast majority of my dealings in my life with Muslims have been dealings of nothing but mutual tolerance, friendliness, and, if you’re talking ‘nationalism/patriotism’, in the majority of cases these people were more strongly ‘British’ in that sense than I am, as I see an accident of birth an utterly pointless, random, arbitrary, and very, very dangerous thing to hitch my identity to. I, like you, like every Muslim who happens to come here could have been born anywhere. Why you, or anyone else, are claiming territorial rights over others who were also born here is bizarre indeed. If they are living within the law, you need to hold your peace, otherwise you become a very pernicious factor in stoking unnecessary bad faith between different people. If, I, a Muslim, am born in the UK, pay my taxes, and I live within the law then you have nothing to say to me. If I happen to pray to Mecca 5 times a day, and you have an issue with that, well, tough; get over it.😳
    2
  11502. 2
  11503.  @jamesmason8436  Your principal problem as I see it, mate, is you’re having issues with the concept of a multicultural Britain. You’re just going to have to deal with this as this is how it’s going to be for the rest of your and my life. Personally, in general, I find the UK to be a pretty successful example of multiculturalism in action, notwithstanding the inevitable deficiencies. We have built our economy for the past 70 years on migrant labour, so you can’t have your cake and eat it. These immigrants from all corners of the world have, in my opinion, indubitably enhanced the UK, making it a relatively prosperous, far more interesting and diverse place that it would be without the colours, foods, languages, customs and, yes, religions, brought by these incomers. If you’re not a ‘believer’ in the multiculturalism of 21st century Britain, and I suspect you’re not, then you should have stated this from the outset and we could have saved ourselves a whole lot of trouble. I will repeat this though, you do seem to have a real bee in your bonnet about a part of the Muslim population, and perhaps the Muslim population in toto. That’s one of the things with multiculturalism: you get all the wonderful variety, and so inevitably within that pick and mix variety there will be flavours more to your taste than others. Like you, I have no time whatsoever for organised religion, but the only reason you’re not picking on Christianity, as far as I can see, is racial. You are culturally closer to Christianity, I’m assuming, so you’ve picked on the ‘funny foreigner’s’ brand. Why not go for Sikhs or Hindus or any other of the UK’s religions? You’ve picked Islam, I would suggest, as you’re intolerant of some of their cultural practices, and what’s more, they are carrying out these practices within your sight-line. That’s what living in a multicultural society means: looking at others and tolerating the difference. You should try it some day, pal.😉
    2
  11504.  @jamesmason8436  ‘Their ideology is migrant in origin then inherited by/imposed upon successive generations’, you say. I say, so what if it’s ‘migrant in origin’? And? Your point? I don’t believe it actually is for the majority of 2nd, 3rd, 4th generation. I live in Glasgow and we have a sizeable Muslim community here completely integrated, living and working in the community, very often holding the top jobs in medicine and the law. You just sound downright racist when you blithely say their ideology is ‘migrant in origin’. Even if it were, so what? You can’t do anything about it as far as I can see. Islam in the mainstream form doesn’t ‘impede human rights’ and the issues you mentioned earlier are, in my experience, in the minority. I, personally, work with 3 individuals who are Muslim, one is married to a white Scotsman, another is openly gay, and another is single, but has been partnered with non-Muslim people in the past. You seem to be monomaniacally focusing on a small sub-set which you have noticed and magnified this out of all proportion to the way the majority of Muslims live in the UK today. As I say, here in Scotland, there is little to no sense of ghettoisation and the Muslim community is well integrated. Yes, I do believe that if laws aren’t broken then, yes, that is hunky-dory. Let’s flip this. I’m a Muslim and can’t stand the prevalent drinking culture of the UK. What can I do about this? Nothing. Ditto you with cultural/religious practices you disdain. You have no right to stop anything on this score within the law. You seem to be implying that if you could you would step in here. If Muslims commit crime disproportionately you need to quote that statistic, not just assert it. Even if they did, again, so what? Whites commit lots of crime, too? Why focus on Muslims? Again, I suggest that if they commit crime and are caught and brought to justice, where’s the issue? As I say, crime is committed by all sorts, from all backgrounds. If there is a small radicalised element then, again, your point is? Are you going to demonise all the followers of a religion for a few black sheep? Your personal experience appears to have tainted your opinion of our Muslim community in the UK, but from my point of view, I’m not seeing what you’re seeing. 🧐 You seem to have the Muslim population of the UK as an obsessive hobby-horse to an almost unhealthy extent judging by the fixation you betray in this thread.
    2
  11505. 2
  11506. 2
  11507. 2
  11508. 2
  11509. 2
  11510. 2
  11511. 2
  11512. 2
  11513. 2
  11514.  @mogznwaz  Well, how very convenient. You ‘don’t define British culture, if you’re British you know it, recognise it and feel it, it doesn’t have to be explained.’ Really? If it doesn’t have to be explained why are certain people bending over backwards to defend some perceived British culture in the face of others whom they perceive, rightly or wrongly, to be ‘less British’ than the next person? You don’t have to explain it because you can’t fucking explain it. Britain and the idea of Britain is a thousand and one different things and more depending on who you speak to, but not one of these things is ‘intrinsically’ British, and could just as well be found in some other part of the planet. I was born here, have lived in France, Belgium, Israel and the USA, and I’m here to tell you that there is nothing you can name as some perceived part of a ‘British culture’ that you can’t also find in these countries and elsewhere under various similar but different guises. Just asserting that there is a ‘British culture’ without demonstrating it won’t do, sunshine. Every country, as far as I can see in this globalised, interconnected world, is a mix and match version of a whole host of multifarious stuff, but nothing you could necessarily pinpoint as intrinsically, say, ‘British’, or ‘French’ or ‘American’, for example. Tea? Well, you get that in China. Fish and chips? Belgium does these rather well, too. Football? Just about any other place you care to mention does this. I could go on and name every supposedly ‘British’ thing, and could also name this as a thing in more than one other country. I suppose you could argue the case for a kind of collective history, but an actual uniquely distinctive culture? Nah. You might have got away with arguing for distinctive national cultures 100 years ago, but not today. As to me being a ‘British self-loathing twat’, well, that just makes no fucking sense to me. Why anyone takes some kind of unearned pride or unearned credit in a random, arbitrary accident of birth is beyond me. You’re actually, with a straight face, telling me you're ‘proud’ your mother plopped you out on a random, arbitrary patch of territory and not some other random, arbitrary territory? You’ll be telling me next you’d have been ‘proud’ of the moon if your mother had miraculously managed to plop you out there, I suppose? I reserve my feelings of ‘pride’ for self-driven, self-motivated achievements: learning a few languages; learning a few musical instruments; raising a happy, healthy family; that kind of thing. Things that, like, y’know, I’ve actually put some fucking effort into. Being born somewhere and not somewhere else is not an achievement last time I checked. And anyway, why should I be forced to stand up in some kind of weird accident of birth pride, privileging those others who were randomly, arbitrarily born in the same plot of land as I? You’re going to force me to put them before some other people who weren’t born on the same plot as I? I don’t operate like that, pal. That’s just irrational and thinking for the unevolved amongst us. It’s like saying I’m ‘proud’ to be 6ft2 or proud I have size 11 feet. You want me to privilege 6ft 2 people over 6ft1 people? You want me to privilege people with size 11 feet over people with size 10 feet? You have no say where you are born so why the fuck are you taking random credit for this? If you had been born in France, you’d be trumpeting France, if you’d been born in Ukraine, you'd more than likely be willing to kill a few Russians just because they were randomly, arbitrarily born in the land we currently call ‘Russia’? If you’d been born in La La Land you’d be boring on at me about some non-existent La La ‘culture’, that you can’t seem to define but you just somehow magically ‘feel’. Get real. Nationalism, along with organised religion, has been the most egregious baleful blight on our planet that we ever invented as a species. Ideas around it are currently threatening our continued existence as a species as we speak. You need to look at the history books, son. Unless we have a critical mass of people defining themselves as first and foremost a human being we’ll be doomed to repeat this crap on an eternal loop ad nauseam. This doesn’t mean to say I’m not willing to defend myself when attacked, but it most certainly does mean that I’m not going to be murdering my species over random acts of birth or random, unverified and unverifiable daddy’s in the sky.😳
    2
  11515.  @PibrochPonder  I’m still not sure where you’re coming from on this. As I see it, the UK is already a kind of ‘melting-pot’ of different cultures, languages and customs, all held together under the notion of being ‘Brit’, however you want to define that term. Most people are just getting along with their lives, obeying the law and paying their way. If you are saying that there are extremist elements of certain groups, then yes. But just because of a few bad apples, are you going disbar the vast majority of others from being able to live their life in a culturally multifaceted UK? My main three points have always been learn the main language, pay your way, and obey the law. Hasn’t the vast majority of this country been doing this since time immemorial right up to the present day? Human beings are messy. No one said it’s easy to swing along with people of your ‘own’ skin colour/faith/tradition, let alone someone else with different ideas about these to yours. The vast majority of the UK population is integrated/assimilated according to your terms. So where’s the issue? Aside from the well-known extremist elements of Islam (a minuscule minority), where exactly is the UK not integrated/assimilated? Where are these fault lines, exactly, as I’m struggling to see them?🧐 You can’t have it both ways. The UK is a free, open, pluralistic, liberal democracy, which permits a certain level of immigration. If you want to stop all immigration at source, that’s fine. It’s just not the world I want to live in; that is an insular world where we each define ourselves as tribally and narrowly as possible and looking askance and with mistrust at everyone who happens to not tick the cultural/racial/religious profile boxes that I happen to tick.
    2
  11516. 2
  11517.  @PibrochPonder  Ok, it looks like ‘indigenous’ is our bone of contention. All I’m saying is that if you are a citizen and you have a referendum on anything , then every citizen has a say. In that case my sister-in-law would have a say. You appeared to suggest, under your indigenous stuff, that she wouldn’t. Fine. She, and others like her get a vote. The whole ‘indigenous’ thing is invidious, for it depends how you define it. You’d have to look at the genes all the way down the line. To me, that’s just a open door for racist theory. I don’t give a fig about your ‘indigenous’ state or otherwise, however you want to define this. I don’t see British citizens as indigenous or non-indigenous, as you appear to. I just see a human. I take each person individually and try not to box them into this or that ethnic/cultural group and I have found this has served me well. As to immigration, I happen to think this is, on balance, a good thing. I am not for open doors, but I’m certainly for substantial controlled immigration and, frankly, as long as they are prepared to work, learn/speak the language and obey the law, I don’t really care where they come from. On balance, I think having a multicultural society is preferable to the alternatives. I don’t want anyone constraining me and asking me to assimilate, so why would I demand that of others? People need to be left free to think and act for themselves and not feel they are being straitjacketed into some assimilated mush. Give me the colour, difference, vibrancy and messiness of a multicultural society than a bland, gray, monocultural one any day of the week. Of course, you will disagree with this. Anyway, I think we’d better stop here as we are just at the risk of repeating ourselves.😳
    2
  11518. 2
  11519. 2
  11520. 2
  11521. 2
  11522. 2
  11523. 2
  11524. 2
  11525. 2
  11526. 2
  11527. 2
  11528. 2
  11529. 2
  11530. 2
  11531. 2
  11532. 2
  11533. 2
  11534. 2
  11535. 2
  11536. 2
  11537. 2
  11538. 2
  11539. 2
  11540. 2
  11541. 2
  11542. 2
  11543. 2
  11544. 2
  11545. 2
  11546. 2
  11547. 2
  11548. 2
  11549. 2
  11550. 2
  11551. 2
  11552. 2
  11553. 2
  11554. 2
  11555. 2
  11556. 2
  11557. 2
  11558. 2
  11559. 2
  11560. 2
  11561. 2
  11562.  @actionflower6706  No. It doesn’t really ‘approximate to my problem’, as you put it. I’m agnostic. Previously stated. I have no issue with people believing wtf they want: my issue arises when said people are unable to defend their stance. That’s all. If an unthought-out, cynical, dishonest, theory of God is promulgated by the likes of JP, then I’ll call it. All that said, my real issue, and for the final time, is the unreflective, uncritical, inadmissible hagiographic mass intellectual orgasm over one man’s words. He’s not right about plenty, is right about some stuff, but you can’t tell this from the mesmerised @rse-lickers, who buy his whole creed hook (book), (by)line and s(t)inker. Creeds and schools in abeyance . Ironically, they commit the error they putatively abhor in others, that is they come to the party with the idea that Peterson’s philosophy is a self-contained, internally-consistent credo to be taken in toto. A system in other words. Just like any other system: Marxism; Socialism; Liberalism; Conservatism; Petersonism. They don’t seem to take his ideas one by one, rather they approach every interlocution with another with the assumption, unacknowledged or otherwise, that whatever Jordy says, goes. I’m here to tell them that not all of it does go, and for some reason I can only put down to the fact they have personally invested their very moral/emotional/intellectual being with him (thus blinding themselves to his not so good ideas), they are unable to accept he might be wrong about something, anything. The horrifying misogyny is one of the main manifestations of their ire. The way they nastily, viciously strafe (often in the most personal of terms: looks, why would any man want her ?) any woman who happens to be interviewing Jordy (and thereby explicitly challenging his ideas, ie. just doing her job) is depressing and alarming simultaneously. If people want to follow the quack nostrums of a bloke who, it seems to me, doesn’t have an original thought, fine. Just don’t expect me to grovel in front of you and intellectually abase myself. I’m better than that. Finally, as to the whole religion thing, you seem to be implying I’m a lapsed Catholic. You’re right. But I was never a fully paid-up member of the God-bothering squad (thank Christ), so it’s not felt as a loss. I happen to agree with the following wonderfully coruscating, (yet true if you read it honestly), definition of the God of the Old Testament, the God of Jews, Christians and Muslims: The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully. To not believe in that monster is a blessed relief. As you will know by now, Pirsig is one of my faves., so what better way than to end with him on the subject of organised religion (note that, organised religion , I’m open to changing my mind about anything with new evidence coming in, and that includes God): When one person suffers from a delusion, it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it is called a Religion. Right now, it seems to me there are a few too many folks suffering from the ‘delusion’ that Jordan B Peterson is absolutafucking right about absolutafucking everything.🥸
    2
  11563. 2
  11564. 2
  11565. 2
  11566. 2
  11567. 2
  11568.  @actionflower6706  Furthermore for the record, love, in case this hasn’t been clear, but I am aware the Jordy gobblers like to pile in and defend their man like valiant troops in a lost cause and one easily loses one’s bearings (and toupee) in the unseemly ensuing kerfuffle; however, my animus is not principally a JP-directed animus, so to speak - the man himself I find a bit of a wet-wipe, yes, could do with smiling/laughing a wee bitty more, yes (I’m almost sure he has a sense of humour, but like his God, it’s often missing-in-action), but essentially JP, the man, is just any other nondescript fella you might meet in Aldi on a wet Wednesday afternoon as he (and you, perchance) escapes ‘’er indoors’ for 5 minutes to peruse the fresh plums (in his case, possibly ‘’im indoors’, if the rumours are to be believed - debate for another day perhaps); no, my ire is specifically reserved for the gobbler (and gobbier) lads and lassies (mainly lads), who betray an almighty hair-trigger sensitivity to even the slightest criticism of Jordy’s ideas. If only they would take that big, veiny, hairy, throbbing, engorged monstrosity out of their mouths once in a blue moon and look up. I would only have to look askance at Jordy’s white wine and spritzer and they would be up in arms in the King’s Arms at how I had traduced the mortal character and the cut of the jib of the very saviour of western civilisation as we know it. A mere brush of tweed sleeve against the small Babycham their haloed hero was nursing quietly in the inglenook of the Shepherd’s Crook, and like a snarling bull about to charge at the taunting matador, they would be at my throat and other exposed bits (not to mention my tweed jacket!). Even on the days I had opted not to wear red! This simply shows how insecure these sycophants feel, for anyone sure of their terms, sure of their boy in the race, would not feel the need to come at me like a pack of slavering hounds at the local (illegal) fox hunt (very certainly the ‘unspeakable in full-pursuit of the un(b)eatable’!); no, they would calmly reason with me, and we could discuss this in a quiet corner, away from the fevered hurly-burly of the intoxicated crowd, while I could take the opportunity in the Gents cubicle to reglue my dislodged toupee atop my bonce away from the mad melee. Y’know, as I sit here pondering the marigolds in my window sill, and watching my pussy from afar licking his nether regions with feline gusto, this rather apposite little quotable gobbet hops into my mind like a sprightly rabbit in a Spring meadow; it’s from Pirsig, and in it he was principally going for the rigid, linear, - ‘I am right you are wrong, and what’s more, because you are wrong you are going to eternal Hell!’ - brigade, but I feel it sums up much of the unthinking, scary, impassioned, frankly bollocks, that our man Jordy attracts: You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in. No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise tomorrow. They know it's going to rise tomorrow. When people are fanatically dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kinds of dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or goals are in doubt. Or as Yeats put it, along similar lines: The best lack all conviction, while the worst are full of passionate intensity. On a final point of order, what you have against that esteemed institution, the University of Sussex, one can only surmise, (yes, the pebbly Brighton beach is horrendous for one’s haemorrhoids, but this is hardly the fault of the Women’s Studies department of that university) but I fear the trauma it may have caused you might need looking at. Before you ask, no, I don’t have Jordan Peterson’s telephone number. ☎️
    2
  11569. 2
  11570. 2
  11571. 2
  11572. 2
  11573. 2
  11574. 2
  11575. 2
  11576. 2
  11577. 2
  11578. Jordan Peterson‘s 12 more (God help us all!) rules for life - an appraisal. Do not carelessly denigrate social institutions or creative achievement. Oh man. Come on! If I can’t slag off the mother-in-law you’ve thereby instantly removed 5% of my reason for getting up in the morning. Similarly, if I see a post-post-modern, abstract-expressionist post-impressionist painting in a gallery I reserve the right to draw a cock and balls over it. I want my artists figurative. Or at the very least, Italian. Imagine who you could be and then aim single-mindedly at that. Hmm … I’m imagining I could be Jordan Peterson. Oh, wait. The world isn’t big enough to contain TWO identical egos that large! Do not hide unwanted things in the fog. Especially if John Carpenter is lurking somewhere in that fog. Notice that opportunity lurks where responsibility has been abdicated. Ok, I think that makes sense. Are you saying that if I refuse to wash the dishes and decline to put the garbage out I’m on a blow-job promise that self same evening? Sounds good to me! Do not do what you hate. Yay! Jordan Peterson himself is telling me I don’t have to read a single thing he ever writes ever again! Thanks Jordy. 🙏 Abandon ideology. What, abandon the ‘ideology’ of condensing the incredible complexity of human life and existence into 12 cookie-cutter platitudes I once read in a bunch of fortune cookies? That ideology? Work as hard as you possibly can on at least one thing and see what happens. Well, since the age of about 13 I’ve been actively fulfilling this injunction and it’s nearly fallen off.😳 Try to make one room in your home as beautiful as possible. Can we agree on a corner of one room? A whole room just sounds extravagant and, frankly, a waste of my time when I’ve got rule 7 to be getting on with.😳 If old memories still upset you, write them down carefully and completely. Yes, they do. However, not sure writing them down will help. Can I not just do the more obvious, sensible thing and, er, like, well, forget them? Plan and work diligently to maintain the romance in your relationship. Yes, I buy my dick flowers at least every other Friday. Do not allow yourself to become resentful, deceitful, or arrogant. Ha! Ya got me. While I resent no one but the milk-man who ran away with the wife back in 1987 (I’m still working through it), and I have deceived no one since that time I pretended I was Jesus at a convention of atheist/agnostics, the ‘arrogant’ one still niggles. Yes, I have to admit that when in an almighty pickle, I do sometimes think: ‘What would Donald Lamont do?’ Sorry. Be grateful in spite of your suffering. Well, one of my avatars kinda said this about 2,600 years before Saint Jordan palmed it off as one of his own. But hey! plagiarism never hurt anybody when you’re trying to fool most of the people most of the time!😁 Note: Jordan Peterson will publish 12 more rules for life when he’s spent all the money he got from gullible fools buying the first 24. 🤔
    2
  11579. Jordan Peterson’s 12 rules for life - an appraisal. Stand up straight with your shoulders straight. Unless you’re a peeping Tom and need to keep below that wall, otherwise that gorgeous, undressing next-door neighbour may spot you. Treat yourself like someone you are responsible for helping. In other words, pick up your own smelly socks, don’t litter, and make your own fucking bed! Befriend people who want the best for you. Well, this rests on your judgement of others’ character. If that’s shit, you’re fucked. Compare yourself to who you were yesterday, not the useless person you are today. This one totally contradicts the whole idea of self-improvement, for if I’m more useless today than I was yesterday, why am I even trying to self-improve?! Do not let your children do anything that makes you dislike them. Well, this assumes that you’re such an insane parental control freak with such a fascistic sense of keeping another in order that it’s not even worth considering, if only to save your own soul. Besides, kids need to make their own mistakes, so tough-titty if the parents can’t take this. Set your house in order before criticising the world. Well, if you’re a saint, perhaps. If you’re a messy flesh and blood human being then criticising the world is what gets most of us through the day, if the drugs aren’t working. Pursue what is meaningful, not what is expedient. Yeah, but that makes the enormous, unfounded assumption that any of this means anything whatsoever. Tell the truth, or at least don’t lie. I’m sorry, but that time my mother caught my porn stash under the bed, I had to lie and pin it on my twin brother, Tommy. Sometimes, lying just is the best policy and those who say otherwise are just liars. Assume the person you are listening to knows something you don’t. Ok. But this one falls down when it comes to my bank PIN number. Be precise in your speech. What, ‘precise’ in one’s speech like Mr Jordan ‘why use 1 word when 21 will do?’ Peterson? Give me the conciseness of a Sam Harris any day. I’m sure Adam Sandler will concur. Do not bother children while they are skateboarding. Unless, that is, they are skateboarding all over your prize flowerbeds; then you can not only ‘bother’ them, but collar them and let them feel your hot garlicky breath on their cheeks. Pet a cat when you encounter one in the street. Unless, that is, the cat is frothing alarmingly at the mouth. Now where’s my publishing deal?😳
    2
  11580.  @pedanticlady9126  Thank you for laughing.😉Would that your fellow posters could do the same. Laughter sometimes really is the best medicine.😆Well, when all the other options have been exhausted. One final thing folks. Someone here, I forget who (you all meld into one giant Peterson gobble-machine after a while and distinguishing the sound sorts becomes futile), accused me of not getting out enough, communing with nature, that sort of thing. They suggested ‘grass’. Well, how clairvoyant and spooky as my guiding text for 30 years (such that I have such a thing) has been Whitman’s Leaves of Grass .However, it’s not a piece of wisdom from that poem/book I would like to leave you all with, but a little prose number he rustled up in between meeting the ‘trippers and askers.’ You might know it: This is what you shall do; Love the earth and sun and the animals, despise riches, give alms to every one that asks, stand up for the stupid and crazy, devote your income and labor to others, hate tyrants, argue not concerning God, have patience and indulgence toward the people, take off your hat to nothing known or unknown or to any man or number of men, go freely with powerful uneducated persons and with the young and with the mothers of families, read these leaves in the open air every season of every year of your life, re-examine all you have been told at school or church or in any book, dismiss whatever insults your own soul, and your very flesh shall be a great poem and have the richest fluency not only in its words but in the silent lines of its lips and face and between the lashes of your eyes and in every motion and joint of your body. May I kindly, and quite ingenuously, suggest that there is more wisdom in those few lines than the likes of Jordan Peterson can hold a candle to. 🕯 One final, final thing. Ok, I admit it, the 4 degrees malarkey was a lie. I don’t even have that diploma with distinction. However, none of this prevents me from engaging my intellectual critical faculties as and when required. Remember to laugh, children. Good day and fare thee well. 🍁
    2
  11581. 2
  11582. 2
  11583. 2
  11584. 2
  11585. 2
  11586. 2
  11587.  @MTech07  It’s a bit disingenuous to suggest Peterson is not driving an ‘overt political agenda’ when his sycophantic flag-bearers leap into the breach whenever any perceived (rightly or wrongly) left-leaning challenger of his ideas questions any of what he says. Yes, Peterson himself may not be overtly political (actually, that should be party political as he certainly is political - as far as I can see he is a traditional British-type conservative thinker with liberal trimmings), but in my experience his feverish defenders most certainly are overtly political in their disdain for anything even remotely left of centre. As to his fans worshipping him, well they do from what I read. It’s sycophantically hagiographic in its obsequiousness towards what is, after all, just a failed, flawed human being. His supporters talk of him as the Second Coming. If you don’t believe me I urge you to go to as many YouTube Peterson videos as you can and read the Comments: they are nauseatingly weird in their blinkered devotion to their saint Jordan. As you point out, he’s a flawed human in many ways, just like the rest of us, but you wouldn’t necessarily know this from these comments. One of the most distasteful tactics I have discerned from the Peterson fanatics is a dreadful, depressing misogyny. The bile and vitriol they dispense to, say, Cathy Newman, or Helen Lewis, to take two salient exemplars, is egregious in its bitterness. The hatred, yes hatred, of the distaff-side they evince is disturbing and depressing in equal measure. As to the notion of defending ‘themselves’ when defending Peterson, well, I dig and semi-idolise a whole host of writers, poets, artists, philosophers, but with none of them, am I so hair-trigger sensitive if someone calmly comes along and points out a flaw in their thinking or way of seeing the world. It bespeaks an exaggeratedly unhealthy sense of identification if these people are so sensitive to their hero being criticised, that they feel the need to lash out like children in the playground. A perfect example of this for me is Peterson’s woolly, unthought-out, frankly embarrassing (for a supposedly ‘key’ contemporary thinker) defence of the existence of a God. He’s also disingenuous on this score as he attempts to have his cake and eat it, for he says he doesn’t believe in God per se, but he ‘acts as if God exists’. Well, sorry, but this nebulous, immature thinking will not do. He doesn’t even make a pretence of broaching the traditional arguments for God’s existence: he just blithely declares ‘I act as if God exists’. It’s the type of thinking worthy of a 10 year old. When this is pointed out the rabid Peterson gang pounce, coming to the defence of their hallowed Master (of the University?). In my opinion, the Peterson apologists need to take a chill pill. Yes, he has a few good ideas (although hardly any that are scintillatingly original), as he should, for don’t we all? However, they should learn a little humility when someone comes along and points out the many holes in Peterson’s thinking. One of my theories about many of his more pervervid idolaters is that actually they don’t know much about his thinking at all, and for whatever reason, they have latched on to Peterson, the man, using him as a surrogate father. I’m willing to bet very good money that many of the Peterson fan club are homosexuals (unacknowledged or otherwise) who have lacked a strong father-figure role model in their lives. How else to explain that about 80% of his core followers are male? Women, I suspect, have more intelligence. Ironic really, given the massive misogyny betrayed by many of the Peterson playthings.🥸
    2
  11588. 2
  11589. 2
  11590. 2
  11591. 2
  11592. 2
  11593. 2
  11594. 2
  11595. 2
  11596. 2
  11597. 2
  11598. 2
  11599. 2
  11600. 2
  11601. 2
  11602. 2
  11603. 2
  11604. 2
  11605. 2
  11606. 2
  11607. 2
  11608. 2
  11609. 2
  11610. 2
  11611. 2
  11612. 2
  11613. 2
  11614. 2
  11615. 2
  11616. 2
  11617. 2
  11618. 2
  11619. 2
  11620. 2
  11621. 2
  11622. 2
  11623. 2
  11624. 2
  11625. 2
  11626. 2
  11627. 2
  11628. 2
  11629. 2
  11630. 2
  11631. 2
  11632. 2
  11633. 2
  11634. 2
  11635. 2
  11636. 2
  11637. 2
  11638. 2
  11639. 2
  11640. 2
  11641. 2
  11642. 2
  11643. 2
  11644. 2
  11645. 2
  11646. 2
  11647. 2
  11648. 2
  11649. 2
  11650. 2
  11651. 2
  11652. 2
  11653. 2
  11654. 2
  11655. 2
  11656. 2
  11657. 2
  11658. 2
  11659. 2
  11660. 2
  11661. 2
  11662. 2
  11663. 2
  11664. 2
  11665. 2
  11666. 2
  11667. 2
  11668. 2
  11669. 2
  11670. 2
  11671. 2
  11672. 2
  11673. 2
  11674. 2
  11675. 2
  11676. 2
  11677. 2
  11678. 2
  11679. 2
  11680. 2
  11681. 2
  11682. 2
  11683. 2
  11684. 2
  11685. 2
  11686. 2
  11687. 2
  11688. 2
  11689. 2
  11690. 2
  11691. 2
  11692. 2
  11693. 2
  11694. 2
  11695. 2
  11696. 2
  11697. 2
  11698. 2
  11699. 2
  11700. 2
  11701. 2
  11702. 2
  11703. 2
  11704. 2
  11705. 2
  11706. 2
  11707. 2
  11708. 2
  11709. 2
  11710. 2
  11711. 2
  11712. 2
  11713. 2
  11714. 2
  11715. 2
  11716. 2
  11717. 2
  11718. ❄️ ⛄️ Crazy stuff! With all these extremes from season to season, they may have to alter the State names accordingly: Squallabama 🥶 Alabalmy 😎 Alaskia 🥶 Baked Alaska 😎 Arizsnowa 🥶 Ablazeona 😎 Arkanthaw 🥶 Arkansawdust 😎 Califognia 🥶 Tropicalifornia 😎 Coolorado 🥶 Swimmingpoolorado 😎 Connecticold 🥶 Airconnecticut 😎 Delaglare 🥶 Delaflare 😎 Flurryda 🥶 Torrida 😎 Georjackfrost 🥶 Scorchia 😎 Thawaii 🥶 Hafryii 😎 Slideaho 🥶 Humidaho 😎 Chillinois 🥶 Grillinois 😎 Windiana 🥶 Indianaked 😎 Iowhiteout 🥶 Fryowa 😎 Kansice 🥶 Tansas 😎 Godforsakentucky🥶Kensunstrucky😎 Louicyana 🥶 Loubeesiana 😎 Mainedeer 🥶 Mainesteam😎 Buryland 🥶 Marysand 😎 Massachillsetts 🥶 Massastewsetts 😎 Michighandwarmers 🥶 Mitchygan 😎 Mittensota 🥶 Manitshota 😎 Missiceslippy 🥶 Missicecreamy 😎 Missfury 🥶 Blissouri 😎 Montanavalanche 🥶 Montfana 😎 Nebbbrrraska 🥶 Nebaska 😎 Nevada ~ already means ‘snowy mountains’ 🥶 New Hampshiver 🥶 New Hampfire 😎 Blew Jersey 🥶 Phew! Jersey 😎 New Mexicool 🥶 Stew Mexico 😎 Snowshoe York 🥶 Tennisshoe York😎 North/South Barrelina 🥶North/South Casolina 😎 North/South Dacoata 🥶 North/South Dakhota 😎 Snowhio 🥶 Ohsigho 😎 Oklabomba 🥶 Sunstrokelahoma 😎 Thawregon 🥶 Oregoneoff 😎 Pennsylweathervania🥶Pennsgrillvania 😎 Rhode Iceland 🥶 Rhode Dryland 😎 Tennessleet 🥶 Tennessteamy 😎 Texice 🥶 Texass 😎 Uthaw 🥶 Blutah 😎 Shivermont 🥶 Heatwavermont 😎 Frozen Riverginia 🥶 Virginiasling 😎 Washingtoboggan 🥶 Washingsun 😎 Rawest Virginia 🥶 Sweat Virginia 😎 Wicesconsin 🥶 Wisconsun 😎 Wysnowing 🥶 Dryoming😎
    2
  11719. 2
  11720. 2
  11721. 2
  11722. 2
  11723. 2
  11724. 2
  11725. 2
  11726. 2
  11727. 2
  11728. 2
  11729. 2
  11730. 2
  11731. 2
  11732. 2
  11733. 2
  11734. 2
  11735. 2
  11736. 2
  11737. 2
  11738. 2
  11739. 2
  11740. 2
  11741. 2
  11742. 2
  11743. 2
  11744. 2
  11745. 2
  11746. 2
  11747. 2
  11748. 2
  11749. 2
  11750. 2
  11751. 2
  11752. 2
  11753. 2
  11754. 2
  11755. 2
  11756. 2
  11757. 2
  11758. 2
  11759. 2
  11760. 2
  11761. 2
  11762. 2
  11763. 2
  11764. 2
  11765. 2
  11766. 2
  11767. 2
  11768. 2
  11769. 2
  11770. 2
  11771. 2
  11772. 2
  11773. 2
  11774. 2
  11775. 2
  11776. 2
  11777. 2
  11778. 2
  11779. 2
  11780. 2
  11781. 2
  11782. 2
  11783. 2
  11784. 2
  11785. 2
  11786. 2
  11787. 2
  11788. 2
  11789. 2
  11790. 2
  11791. 2
  11792. 2
  11793. 2
  11794. 2
  11795. 2
  11796. 2
  11797. 2
  11798. 2
  11799. 2
  11800. 2
  11801. 2
  11802. 2
  11803. 2
  11804. 2
  11805. 2
  11806. 2
  11807. 2
  11808. 2
  11809. 2
  11810. 2
  11811. 2
  11812. 2
  11813. 2
  11814. 2
  11815. 2
  11816. 2
  11817. 2
  11818. 2
  11819. 2
  11820. 2
  11821. 2
  11822. 2
  11823. 2
  11824. 2
  11825. 2
  11826. 2
  11827. 2
  11828. 2
  11829. 2
  11830. 2
  11831. 2
  11832. 2
  11833. 2
  11834. 2
  11835. 2
  11836. 2
  11837. 2
  11838. 2
  11839. 2
  11840. 2
  11841. 2
  11842. 2
  11843. 2
  11844. 2
  11845. 2
  11846. 2
  11847. 2
  11848. 2
  11849. 2
  11850. 2
  11851. 2
  11852. 2
  11853. 2
  11854. 2
  11855. 2
  11856. 2
  11857. 2
  11858. 2
  11859. 2
  11860. 2
  11861. 2
  11862. 2
  11863. 2
  11864. 2
  11865. 2
  11866. 2
  11867. 2
  11868. 2
  11869. 2
  11870. 2
  11871. 2
  11872. 2
  11873. 2
  11874. 2
  11875. 2
  11876. 2
  11877. 2
  11878. 2
  11879. 2
  11880. 2
  11881. 2
  11882. 2
  11883. 2
  11884. 2
  11885. 2
  11886. 2
  11887. 2
  11888. 2
  11889. 2
  11890. 2
  11891. 2
  11892. 2
  11893. 2
  11894. 2
  11895. 2
  11896. 2
  11897. 2
  11898. 2
  11899. 2
  11900. 2
  11901. 2
  11902. 2
  11903. 2
  11904. 2
  11905. 2
  11906. 2
  11907. 2
  11908. 2
  11909. 2
  11910. 2
  11911. 2
  11912. 2
  11913. 2
  11914. 2
  11915. 2
  11916. 2
  11917. 2
  11918. 2
  11919. 2
  11920. 2
  11921. 2
  11922. 2
  11923. 2
  11924. 2
  11925. 2
  11926. 2
  11927. 2
  11928. 2
  11929. 2
  11930. 2
  11931. 2
  11932. 2
  11933. 2
  11934. 2
  11935. 2
  11936. 2
  11937. 2
  11938. 2
  11939. 2
  11940. 2
  11941. 2
  11942. 2
  11943. 2
  11944. 2
  11945. 2
  11946. 2
  11947. 2
  11948. 2
  11949. 2
  11950. 2
  11951. 2
  11952. 2
  11953. 2
  11954. 2
  11955. 2
  11956. 2
  11957. 2
  11958. 2
  11959. 2
  11960. 2
  11961. 2
  11962. 2
  11963. 2
  11964. 2
  11965. 2
  11966. 2
  11967. 2
  11968. 2
  11969. 2
  11970. 2
  11971. 2
  11972. 2
  11973. 2
  11974. 2
  11975. 2
  11976. 2
  11977. 2
  11978. 2
  11979. 2
  11980. 2
  11981. 2
  11982. 2
  11983. 2
  11984. 2
  11985. 2
  11986. 2
  11987. 2
  11988. 2
  11989. 2
  11990. 2
  11991. 2
  11992. 2
  11993. 2
  11994. 2
  11995. 2
  11996. 2
  11997. 2
  11998. 2
  11999. 2
  12000. 2
  12001. 2
  12002. 2
  12003. 2
  12004. 2
  12005. 2
  12006. 2
  12007. 2
  12008. 2
  12009. 2
  12010. 2
  12011. 2
  12012. 2
  12013. 2
  12014. 2
  12015. 2
  12016. 2
  12017. 2
  12018. 2
  12019. 2
  12020. 2
  12021. 2
  12022. 2
  12023. 2
  12024. 2
  12025. 2
  12026. 2
  12027. 2
  12028. 2
  12029. 2
  12030. 2
  12031. 2
  12032. 2
  12033. 2
  12034. 2
  12035. 2
  12036. 2
  12037. 2
  12038. 2
  12039. 2
  12040. 2
  12041. 2
  12042. 2
  12043. 2
  12044. 2
  12045. 2
  12046. 2
  12047. 2
  12048. 2
  12049. 2
  12050. 2
  12051. 2
  12052. 2
  12053. 2
  12054. 2
  12055. 2
  12056. 2
  12057. 2
  12058. 2
  12059. 2
  12060. 2
  12061. 2
  12062. 2
  12063. 2
  12064. 2
  12065. 2
  12066. 2
  12067. 2
  12068. 2
  12069. 2
  12070. 2
  12071. 2
  12072. 2
  12073. 2
  12074. 2
  12075. 2
  12076. 2
  12077. 2
  12078. 2
  12079. 2
  12080. 2
  12081. 2
  12082. While observing the bedlam being played out daily on our screens, I couldn’t help but be struck by how eerily similar this whole farrago is to Kubrick’s Dr Strangelove , with a slight tweaking of point-of-view, and flipping of roles, in which America is Russia and Russia is America. In Kubrick’s masterpiece, American Brigadier General Jack D Ripper (Putin), has been driven insane with paranoia by events of the Cold War, (in Putin’s case insanity and monomaniacal Post-Cold War paranoia at a loss and diminution of his beloved Russia, as was USSR.) Ripper has become convinced that there is a plot by the ‘Commies’ (USA/NATO in Putin’s case) to ‘sap and contaminate our precious bodily fluids’. (In Putin’s case to sap and contaminate the minds of the Russians, and the idea of a Greater Russian Empire.) Ripper decides to take pre-emptive, first-strike unilateral action by striking the USSR. (Putin’s pre-emptive strike on Ukraine, and by extension the West in general.) The B-52s, under Ripper’s command, go in and hydrogen bomb the USSR. (Mercifully, Putin has not yet gone this far.) The US president along with his back-room staff attempt to stop the bombers from delivering their payload. (We can only pray Putin has back-room staff strong enough and prepared to step in if he tries to fulfill his nuclear threat.) Here’s the rub, however, the only way to stop the bombers in Dr Strangelove ,is a recall code which only Ripper knows. (We must pray, even the atheists/agnostics amongst us, that with Putin, it’s not only him that has access to the button.) The US government tries to capture Ripper to get the recall code from him, but Ripper gets away. (Will we be able to stop Putin?) The really scary kicker in Kubrick’s film, however, is that the Soviets have built a doomsday machine that will launch enough missiles to destroy all life on Earth if an American nuclear bomb hits them. (I’m pretty confident Putin’s enemies - us - won’t go this far.) Eventually, Ripper is overpowered, but shoots himself before the recall code can be given. (An inside job on Putin, perhaps, before he can incinerate the planet?) One man ignores the recall code and piles headlong towards Moscow. (A member of Putin’s inner team, perhaps?) He attempts to drop the bomb (On Ukraine? On Europe? On America?) After some door-jamming black humour he opens the doors and rides down on the bomb. 💣 Moscow retaliates with horrifying consequences for the planet. (Surely the West won’t go this far.) Let’s hope that, in this case, life won’t imitate art.👀
    2
  12083. 2
  12084. 2
  12085. 2
  12086. 2
  12087. 2
  12088. 2
  12089. 2
  12090. 2
  12091. 2
  12092. 2
  12093. 2
  12094. 2
  12095. 2
  12096. 2
  12097. 2
  12098. 2
  12099. 2
  12100. 2
  12101. 2
  12102. 2
  12103. 2
  12104. 2
  12105. 2
  12106. 2
  12107. 2
  12108. 2
  12109. 2
  12110. 2
  12111. 2
  12112. 2
  12113. 2
  12114. 2
  12115. 2
  12116. 2
  12117. 2
  12118. 2
  12119. 2
  12120. 2
  12121. 2
  12122. 2
  12123. 2
  12124. 2
  12125. 2
  12126. 2
  12127. 2
  12128. 2
  12129. 2
  12130. 2
  12131. 2
  12132. 2
  12133. 2
  12134. 2
  12135. 2
  12136. 2
  12137. 2
  12138. 2
  12139. 2
  12140. 2
  12141. 2
  12142. 2
  12143. 2
  12144. 2
  12145. 2
  12146. 2
  12147. 2
  12148. 2
  12149. 2
  12150. 2
  12151. 2
  12152. 2
  12153. 2
  12154. 2
  12155. 2
  12156. 2
  12157. 2
  12158. 2
  12159. 2
  12160. 2
  12161. 2
  12162. 2
  12163. 2
  12164. 2
  12165. 2
  12166. 2
  12167. 2
  12168. 2
  12169. 2
  12170. 2
  12171. 2
  12172. 2
  12173. 2
  12174. 2
  12175. 2
  12176. 2
  12177. 2
  12178. 2
  12179. 2
  12180. 2
  12181. 2
  12182. 2
  12183. 2
  12184. 2
  12185. 2
  12186. 2
  12187. 2
  12188. 2
  12189. 2
  12190. 2
  12191. 2
  12192. 2
  12193. 2
  12194. 2
  12195. 2
  12196. 2
  12197. 2
  12198. 2
  12199. 2
  12200. 2
  12201. 2
  12202. 2
  12203. 2
  12204. 2
  12205. 2
  12206. 2
  12207. 2
  12208. 2
  12209. 2
  12210. 2
  12211. 2
  12212. 2
  12213. 2
  12214. 2
  12215. 2
  12216. 2
  12217. 2
  12218. 2
  12219. 2
  12220. 2
  12221. 2
  12222. 2
  12223. 2
  12224. 2
  12225. 2
  12226. 2
  12227. 2
  12228. 2
  12229. 2
  12230. 2
  12231. 2
  12232. 2
  12233. 2
  12234. 2
  12235. 2
  12236. Peace talks in a fantasy world Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Ok, we want Russia to de-nuclearise and committed to not militarising the Russia/Ukraine border.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “We want Russia disarmed to ensure no threat to Ukraine (or anyone else)” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want protection for the Ukrainian language in eastern Ukraine.” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “We want Russia to emerge from communist dictatorship and come into the light of free, liberal democracies.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “We want Moscow and St Petersburg to be recognised as free Ukrainian cities.” Peace talks in the real world Putin: Putin: “I want Ukraine neutralised and committed to not seeking NATO membership.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Ukraine disarmed to ensure no threat to Russia.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want protection for the Russian language in Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done” Putin: “I want the deNazification of Ukraine.” Ukraine: “Done.” Putin: “I want Crimea formally identified as Russian along with other parts of east Ukraine including the Donbas.” Ukraine: “Done.” Moral of story: Sometimes bullies just get a little of what they want, but never mess with someone by pitching up at their home expecting to take it forcibly, for as Dustin Hoffman going apeshit in Strawdogs has shown: you are unlikely to win.
    2
  12237. 2
  12238. 2
  12239. 2
  12240. 2
  12241. 2
  12242. 2
  12243. 2
  12244. 2
  12245. 2
  12246. 2
  12247. 2
  12248. 2
  12249. 2
  12250. 2
  12251. 2
  12252. 2
  12253. 2
  12254. 2
  12255. 2
  12256. 2
  12257. 2
  12258. 2
  12259. 2
  12260. 2
  12261. 2
  12262. 2
  12263. 2
  12264. 2
  12265. 2
  12266. 2
  12267. 2
  12268. 2
  12269. 2
  12270. 2
  12271. 2
  12272. 2
  12273. 2
  12274. 2
  12275. 2
  12276. 2
  12277. 2
  12278. 2
  12279. 2
  12280. 2
  12281. 2
  12282. 2
  12283. 2
  12284. 2
  12285. 2
  12286. 2
  12287. 2
  12288. 2
  12289. 2
  12290. 2
  12291. 2
  12292. 2
  12293. 2
  12294. 2
  12295. 2
  12296. 2
  12297. 2
  12298. 2
  12299. 2
  12300. 2
  12301. 2
  12302. 2
  12303. 2
  12304. 2
  12305. 2
  12306. 2
  12307. 2
  12308. 2
  12309. 2
  12310. 2
  12311.  @alexiveperez4687  Understood. But … Barcelona and its wider metropolitan area is hardly representative here, as it’s an international city with a strong admixture of internationals and non-Catalan Spaniards. I have traveled fairly extensively in the region over the years (Lleida, Vic, Puigcerda, Tarragona, all over really) and what struck me in all these places was the strength of Catalan feeling for, yes, full independence. Most were speaking the language, and most were not wealthy elites, which, as you suggested, was the part of the Catalan society most in favour of independence. For example, I was in Girona about 5 years ago for a few weeks, and everyone, and I mean everyone, was as the default setting, speaking Catalan (to me, Castilian, as a non-Catalan speaker); young, old, wealthy, not so wealthy. I think this is more representative of what’s going on rather than the slightly anomalous city of Barcelona. You didn’t really answer my question though. So, again, tomorrow, Catalonia, the Basque region and Galicia all become independent: what would your feelings be about this? You say you’re not political, and I respect this, but you will have feelings either way, I’m sure. Part of the reason I ask is that over the years I have sensed a strong emotion, almost fear, of the aforementioned regions’ secession from the wider Spanish state, in the rest of Spain. Yes, they grumble and mumble in public about those pesky people in the northern regions talking independence, affecting an air of insouciance, but when it comes down to it, if the Spanish state were to split, as we currently know it, these non-separatist wider Spaniards would almost feel it like the loss of a limb. I don’t just mean the wider economic implications of regional secession and independence but I mean an almost metaphysical sundering of their very being and identity; like losing a brother or sister.
    2
  12312. 2
  12313. 2
  12314. 2
  12315. 2
  12316. 2
  12317. 2
  12318. 2
  12319. 2
  12320. 2
  12321. 2
  12322. 2
  12323. 2
  12324. 2
  12325. 2
  12326. 2
  12327. 2
  12328. 2
  12329. 2
  12330. 2
  12331. 2
  12332. 2
  12333. 2
  12334. 2
  12335. 2
  12336. 2
  12337. 2
  12338. 2
  12339. 2
  12340. 2
  12341. 2
  12342. 2
  12343. 2
  12344. 2
  12345. 2
  12346. 2
  12347. 2
  12348. 2
  12349. 2
  12350. 2
  12351. 2
  12352. 2
  12353. 2
  12354. 2
  12355. 2
  12356. 2
  12357. 2
  12358. 2
  12359. 2
  12360. 2
  12361. 2
  12362. 2
  12363. 2
  12364. 2
  12365. 2
  12366. 2
  12367. 2
  12368. 2
  12369. 2
  12370. 2
  12371. 2
  12372. 2
  12373. 2
  12374. 2
  12375. 2
  12376. 2
  12377. 2
  12378. 2
  12379. 2
  12380. 2
  12381. 2
  12382. 2
  12383. 2
  12384. 2
  12385. 2
  12386. 2
  12387. 2
  12388. 2
  12389. 2
  12390. 2
  12391. 2
  12392. 2
  12393. 2
  12394. 2
  12395. 2
  12396. 2
  12397. 2
  12398. 2
  12399. 2
  12400. 2
  12401. 2
  12402. 2
  12403. 2
  12404. 2
  12405. 2
  12406. 2
  12407. 2
  12408. 2
  12409. 2
  12410. 2
  12411. 2
  12412. 2
  12413. 2
  12414. 2
  12415. 2
  12416. 2
  12417. 2
  12418. 2
  12419. 2
  12420. 2
  12421. 2
  12422. 2
  12423. 2
  12424. 2
  12425. 2
  12426. 2
  12427. 2
  12428. 2
  12429. 2
  12430. 2
  12431. 2
  12432. 2
  12433. 2
  12434. 2
  12435. 2
  12436. 2
  12437. 2
  12438. 2
  12439. 2
  12440. 2
  12441. 2
  12442. 2
  12443. 2
  12444. 2
  12445. 2
  12446. 2
  12447. 2
  12448. 2
  12449. 2
  12450. 2
  12451. 2
  12452. 2
  12453. 2
  12454. 2
  12455. 2
  12456. 2
  12457. 2
  12458. 2
  12459. 2
  12460. 2
  12461. 2
  12462. 2
  12463. 2
  12464. 2
  12465. 2
  12466. 2
  12467. 2
  12468. 2
  12469. 2
  12470. 2
  12471. 2
  12472. 2
  12473. 2
  12474. 2
  12475. 2
  12476. 2
  12477. 2
  12478. 2
  12479. 2
  12480. 2
  12481. 2
  12482. 2
  12483. 2
  12484. 2
  12485. 2
  12486. 2
  12487. 2
  12488. 2
  12489. 2
  12490. 2
  12491. 2
  12492. 2
  12493. 2
  12494. 2
  12495. 2
  12496. 2
  12497. 2
  12498. 2
  12499. 2
  12500. 2
  12501. 2
  12502. 2
  12503. 2
  12504. 2
  12505. 2
  12506. 2
  12507. 2
  12508. 2
  12509. 2
  12510. 2
  12511. 2
  12512. 2
  12513. 2
  12514. 2
  12515. 2
  12516. 2
  12517. 2
  12518. 2
  12519. 2
  12520. 2
  12521. 2
  12522. 2
  12523. 2
  12524. 2
  12525. 2
  12526. 2
  12527. 2
  12528. 2
  12529. 2
  12530. 2
  12531. 2
  12532. 2
  12533. 2
  12534. 2
  12535. 2
  12536. 2
  12537. 2
  12538. 2
  12539. 2
  12540. 2
  12541. 2
  12542. 2
  12543. 2
  12544. 2
  12545. 2
  12546. 2
  12547. 2
  12548. 2
  12549. 2
  12550. 2
  12551. 2
  12552. 2
  12553. 2
  12554. 2
  12555. 2
  12556. 2
  12557. 2
  12558. 2
  12559. 2
  12560. 2
  12561. 2
  12562. 2
  12563. 2
  12564. 2
  12565. 2
  12566. 2
  12567. 2
  12568. 2
  12569. 2
  12570. 2
  12571. 2
  12572. 2
  12573. 2
  12574. 2
  12575. 2
  12576. 2
  12577. 2
  12578. 2
  12579. 2
  12580. 2
  12581. 2
  12582. 2
  12583. 2
  12584. 2
  12585. 2
  12586. 2
  12587. 2
  12588. 2
  12589. 2
  12590. 2
  12591. 2
  12592. 2
  12593. This was highly entertaining, but as ever with these things, we have the extremes of the debate, which is anathema to those of us who like to be a bit more balanced. Whenever the topic of climate change/global warming comes up, as someone neither particularly right nor particularly left politically, I despair at how tribalised and polarised this debate becomes with each camp ensconced in their respective corners, equally convinced that their case is watertight. As ever with these things (and the reason I’m a centrist in almost everything), the truth lies somewhere in the middle. One of the most reasoned and balanced paragraphs I have ever read about this topic is the following from Stephen Pinker: If the emission of greenhouse gases continues, the Earth’s average temperature will rise to at least 1.5°C above the preindustrial level by the end of the 21st century, and perhaps to 4°C above that level or more. That will cause more frequent and more severe heat waves, more floods in wet regions, more droughts in dry regions, heavier storms, more severe hurricanes, lower crop yields in warm regions, the extinction of more species, the loss of coral reefs (because the oceans will be both warmer and more acidic), and an average rise in sea level of between 0.7 metres and 1.2 metres from both the melting of land ice and the expansion of seawater. (Sea level has already risen almost eight inches since 1870, and the rate of the rise appears to be accelerating.) Low-lying areas would be flooded, island nations would disappear beneath the waves, large stretches of farmland would no longer be arable, and millions of people would be displaced. The effects could get still worse in the 22nd century and beyond, and in theory could trigger upheavals such as a diversion of the Gulf Stream (which would turn Europe into Siberia) or a collapse of the Antarctic ice sheets. A rise of 2°C is considered the most that the world could reasonably adapt to, and a rise of 4°C, in the words of a 2012 World Bank report, “simply must not be allowed to occur.” The planet is warming. Fact. Humans (according to the overwhelming scientific consensus) are the principal cause of this warming over the past couple of centuries through fossil fuel burning. Now, given this, and given the consequences eloquently outlined by Pinker, we have to collectively decide whether we want to continue on this trajectory or not. For me, given the data, and given the projected consequences contingent upon that data, it makes utter sense to phase out fossil fuels. With this caveat: we must do it sensibly. They will be needed for some time to come as the transition to renewables is made. Who knows? Given that we are currently in an interglacial period, 500 years down the line when we have stopped using fossil fuels, the planet might start a rapid cooling trend leading to that ever-promised next Ice Age, and there might be a desperate clamour to start burning fossil fuels as quickly as possible!
    2
  12594. 2
  12595. 2
  12596. 2
  12597. 2
  12598. 2
  12599. 2
  12600. 2
  12601. 2
  12602. 2
  12603. 2
  12604. 2
  12605. 2
  12606. 2
  12607. 2
  12608. 2
  12609. 2
  12610. 2
  12611. 2
  12612. 2
  12613. 2
  12614. 2
  12615. 2
  12616. 2
  12617. 2
  12618. 2
  12619. 2
  12620. 2
  12621. 2
  12622. 2
  12623. 2
  12624. 2
  12625. 2
  12626. 2
  12627. 2
  12628. 2
  12629. 2
  12630. 2
  12631. 2
  12632. 2
  12633. 2
  12634. 2
  12635. 2
  12636. 2
  12637. 2
  12638. 2
  12639. 2
  12640. 2
  12641. 2
  12642. 2
  12643. 2
  12644. 2
  12645. 2
  12646. 2
  12647. 2
  12648. 2
  12649. 2
  12650. 2
  12651. 2
  12652. 2
  12653. 2
  12654. 2
  12655. 2
  12656. 2
  12657. 2
  12658. 2
  12659. 2
  12660. 2
  12661. 2
  12662. 2
  12663. 2
  12664. 2
  12665. 2
  12666. 2
  12667. 2
  12668. 2
  12669. 2
  12670. 2
  12671. 2
  12672. 2
  12673. 2
  12674. 2
  12675. 2
  12676. 2
  12677. 2
  12678. 2
  12679. 2
  12680. 2
  12681. 2
  12682. 2
  12683. 2
  12684. 2
  12685. 2
  12686. 2
  12687. 2
  12688. 2
  12689. 2
  12690. 2
  12691. 2
  12692. 2
  12693. 2
  12694. 2
  12695. 2
  12696. 2
  12697. 2
  12698. 2
  12699. 2
  12700. 2
  12701. 2
  12702. 2
  12703. 2
  12704. 2
  12705. 2
  12706. 2
  12707. 2
  12708. 2
  12709. 2
  12710. 2
  12711. 2
  12712. 2
  12713. 2
  12714. 2
  12715. 2
  12716. 2
  12717. 2
  12718. 2
  12719. 2
  12720. 2
  12721. 2
  12722. 2
  12723. 2
  12724. 2
  12725. 2
  12726. 2
  12727. 2
  12728. 2
  12729. 2
  12730. 2
  12731. 2
  12732.  @mindcraft4362  What I find interesting in this whole debate, as a neutral onlooker from the sidelines (neither “trans” - whatever that means - nor biologically female) is that the trans community, like you here, are always banging on about your “rights” and “freedoms”, when surely the key thing in this whole debate is the preference and rights of biological females as it's they who are potentially having their private spaces occupied. My guess (but it’s a guess based on extensive experience) would be that the vast majority of women (ie with cervix) wouldn’t want biological men in their private spaces, regardless of whether these men self-identify as “women”, and even if they have fully transitioned through physical/chemical castration. Put it this way: if I were a young mum taking her pre-teen child to the public swimming pool, would I want biological men (regardless of their trans status) sharing the changing rooms with me? Answer: no. This does not mean I’m “anti-trans”; it means I am pro-protecting safe spaces for biological women. I don’t care how you self-identify, just as long as your chosen identity doesn’t adversely affect my life. The analogy would be with organised religion: I’m agnostic; believe in and worship what you want, but when this unfavourably impinges on my life, that’s when my hackles are raised. Religion should be a private matter and not pervade the public sphere and potentially adversely affect the lives of others. With trans people, they can do what they want within the law, express themselves how they want, call themselves what they want (and I will honour this), but if the majority of biological females don’t want them actually physically invading their private spaces (which seems to be the case), then this majority wish should be honoured in practice.
    2
  12733. 2
  12734. 2
  12735. 2
  12736. 2
  12737. 2
  12738. 2
  12739. 2
  12740. 2
  12741. 2
  12742. 2
  12743. 2
  12744. 2
  12745. 2
  12746. 2
  12747. 2
  12748. 2
  12749. 2
  12750. 2
  12751. 2
  12752. 2
  12753. 2
  12754. 2
  12755. 2
  12756. 2
  12757. 2
  12758. 2
  12759. 2
  12760. 2
  12761. 2
  12762. 2
  12763. 2
  12764. 2
  12765. 2
  12766. 2
  12767. 2
  12768. 2
  12769. 2
  12770. 2
  12771. 2
  12772. 2
  12773. 2
  12774. 2
  12775. 2
  12776. 2
  12777. 2
  12778. 2
  12779. 2
  12780. 2
  12781. 2
  12782. 2
  12783. 2
  12784. 2
  12785. 2
  12786. 2
  12787. 2
  12788. 2
  12789. 2
  12790. 2
  12791. 2
  12792. 2
  12793. 2
  12794. 2
  12795. 2
  12796. 2
  12797. 2
  12798. 2
  12799. 2
  12800. 2
  12801. 2
  12802. 2
  12803. 2
  12804. 2
  12805. 2
  12806. 2
  12807. 2
  12808. 2
  12809. 2
  12810. 2
  12811. 2
  12812. 2
  12813. 2
  12814. 2
  12815. 2
  12816. 2
  12817. 2
  12818. 2
  12819. 2
  12820. 2
  12821. 2
  12822. 2
  12823. 2
  12824. 2
  12825. 2
  12826. 2
  12827. 2
  12828. 2
  12829. 2
  12830. 2
  12831. 2
  12832. 2
  12833. 2
  12834. 2
  12835. 2
  12836. 2
  12837. 2
  12838. 2
  12839. 2
  12840. 2
  12841. 2
  12842. 2
  12843. 2
  12844. 2
  12845. 2
  12846. 2
  12847.  @wundurra24  I was curious. Wasn’t sure myself. It looks like Jesus wasn’t a refugee as we understand that term today. Merriam-Webster defines refugee as “a person who flees to a foreign country or power to escape danger or persecution.” Refugees are typically forced to leave their country because of some impending violence directed toward them. Under that broad definition, it may seem that Jesus and His parents might have qualified for a time as refugees. However, there is a difference between the dictionary definition of refugee and its use as a political term today. In the New Testament, Matthew records the following: “An angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream. ‘Get up,’ he said, ‘take the child and his mother and escape to Egypt. Stay there until I tell you, for Herod is going to search for the child to kill him.’ So he got up, took the child and his mother during the night and left for Egypt, where he stayed until the death of Herod. And so was fulfilled what the Lord had said through the prophet: ‘Out of Egypt I called my son’” (Matthew 2:13–15). Jesus was not a “refugee” in any sense meaningful to today’s world. For one thing, Jesus’ family never left the Roman Empire; they simply fled from one region of Roman territory to another Roman territory. That would be like someone moving legally from one state to another within the USA to leave the jurisdiction of the governor of the first state. Also, Luke makes it clear that Joseph and Mary went out of their way to follow Roman law in adhering to the census (Luke 2:1–5). Everything they did was legal. Jesus and His family moved to Egypt in order to escape King Herod’s murderous intentions, but they had a plan, and they had supplies and support. Their trip was entirely self-funded, due to the gifts of the magi. And their sojourn in Egypt was short. The family remained there until the death of Herod, at which time they returned home (Matthew 2:19–21). Given these details, there’s no real parallel to the modern, indigent refugee who asks permission to enter a new country to avoid some calamity. There is some truth to the idea that Jesus was a persecuted and poor man, and so we need to consider how we treat those who are displaced and impoverished. However, in the interest of accuracy, Jesus was not what one would consider a “refugee,” either then or now.
    2
  12848. 2
  12849. 2
  12850. 2
  12851. 2
  12852. 2
  12853. 2
  12854. 2
  12855. 2
  12856. 2
  12857. 2
  12858. 2
  12859. 2
  12860. 2
  12861. 2
  12862. 2
  12863. 2
  12864. 2
  12865. 2
  12866. 2
  12867. 2
  12868. 2
  12869. 2
  12870. 2
  12871. 2
  12872. 2
  12873. 2
  12874. 2
  12875. 2
  12876. 2
  12877. 2
  12878. 2
  12879. 2
  12880. 2
  12881. 2
  12882. 2
  12883. 2
  12884. 2
  12885. 2
  12886. 2
  12887. 2
  12888. 2
  12889. 2
  12890. 2
  12891. 2
  12892. 2
  12893. 2
  12894. 2
  12895. 2
  12896. 2
  12897. 2
  12898. 2
  12899. 2
  12900. 2
  12901. 2
  12902. 2
  12903. 2
  12904. 2
  12905. 2
  12906. 2
  12907. 2
  12908. 2
  12909. 2
  12910. 2
  12911. 2
  12912. 2
  12913. 2
  12914. 2
  12915. 2
  12916. 2
  12917. 2
  12918. 2
  12919. 2
  12920. 2
  12921. 2
  12922. 2
  12923. 2
  12924. 2
  12925. 2
  12926. 2
  12927. 2
  12928. 2
  12929. 2
  12930. 2
  12931. 2
  12932. 2
  12933. 2
  12934. 2
  12935. 2
  12936. 2
  12937. 2
  12938. 2
  12939. 2
  12940. 2
  12941. 2
  12942. 2
  12943. 2
  12944. 2
  12945. 2
  12946. 2
  12947. 2
  12948. 2
  12949. 2
  12950. 2
  12951. 2
  12952. 2
  12953. 2
  12954. 2
  12955. 2
  12956. 2
  12957. 2
  12958. 2
  12959. 2
  12960. 2
  12961. 2
  12962. 2
  12963. 2
  12964. 2
  12965. 2
  12966. 2
  12967. 2
  12968. 2
  12969. 2
  12970. 2
  12971. 2
  12972. 2
  12973. 2
  12974. 2
  12975. 2
  12976. 2
  12977. 2
  12978. 2
  12979. 2
  12980. 2
  12981. 2
  12982. 2
  12983. 2
  12984. 2
  12985. 2
  12986. 2
  12987. 2
  12988. 2
  12989. 2
  12990. 2
  12991. 2
  12992. 2
  12993. 2
  12994. 2
  12995. 2
  12996. 2
  12997. 2
  12998. 2
  12999. 2
  13000. 2
  13001. 2
  13002. 2
  13003. 2
  13004. 2
  13005. 2
  13006. 2
  13007. 2
  13008. 2
  13009. 2
  13010. 2
  13011. 2
  13012. 2
  13013. 2
  13014. 2
  13015. 2
  13016. 2
  13017. 2
  13018. 2
  13019. 2
  13020. 2
  13021. 2
  13022. 2
  13023. 2
  13024. 2
  13025. 2
  13026. 2
  13027. 2
  13028. 2
  13029. 2
  13030. 2
  13031. 2
  13032. 2
  13033. 2
  13034. 2
  13035. 2
  13036. 2
  13037. 2
  13038. 2
  13039. 2
  13040. 2
  13041. 2
  13042. 2
  13043. 2
  13044. 2
  13045. 2
  13046. 2
  13047. 2
  13048. 2
  13049. 2
  13050. 2
  13051. 2
  13052. 2
  13053. 2
  13054. 2
  13055. 2
  13056. 2
  13057. 2
  13058. 2
  13059. 2
  13060. 2
  13061. 2
  13062. 2
  13063. 2
  13064. 2
  13065. Well said, Mr Burns. The American Empire has been one of the wickedest since, well, about 1776, with its invasions of sovereign, self-governing nations and/or the overturning of democratically-elected governments from within and the installation of proxies favourable to American interests. Hello Zelensky. Too much to detail so I’ll take it from 1945. Read it and weep at the staggering, egregious, dreadful hypocrisy of a nation that has not a leg to stand on when criticising others playing the tune America has played these past 250 years, given that it has meddled aggressively in the affairs of virtually every sovereign nation on Earth at one point or another: US invades China 1945-46 - OK US invades Korea 1950-53 - OK US invades China (again) 1950-53 - OK US invades Guatemala 1954 - OK US invades Indonesia 1958 - OK US invades Cuba 1959-60 - OK US invades Guatemala (again) 1960 - OK US invades Belgian Congo 1964 - OK US invades Guatemala (yet again) 1964 - OK US invades Dominican Republic 1965-66 - OK US invades Peru 1965 - OK US invades Laos 1964-73 - OK US invades Vietnam 1961-73 - OK US invades Cambodia 1969-70 - OK US invades Guatemala (and yet again) 1967-69 - OK US invades Lebanon 1982-84 - OK US invades Grenada 1983-84 - OK US invades Libya 1986 - OK US invades El Salvador 1981-92 - OK US invades Nicaragua 1981-90 - OK US invades Iran 1987-88 - OK US invades Libya (again) 1989 - OK US invades Panama 1989-90 - OK US invades Iraq 1991 - OK US invades Kuwait 1991 - OK US invades Somalia 1992-94 - OK US invades Bosnia 1995 - OK US invades Iran 1998 - OK US invades Sudan 1998 - OK US invades Afghanistan 1998 - OK US invades Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999 - OK US invades Afghanistan 2001 - OK US invades Iraq (again) 2003 - OK US invades Libya (yet again) 2011 - OK US invades Iraq (and yet again) and Syria 2014 – OK US invades Somalia 2011 – OK US invades Iran 2020 – OK Russia invades Ukraine 2022 - not OK
    2
  13066. 2
  13067. 2
  13068. 2
  13069. 2
  13070. 2
  13071. 2
  13072. 2
  13073. 2
  13074. 2
  13075. 2
  13076. 2
  13077. 2
  13078. 2
  13079. 2
  13080. 2
  13081. 2
  13082. 2
  13083. 2
  13084. 2
  13085. 2
  13086. 2
  13087. 2
  13088. 2
  13089. 2
  13090. 2
  13091. 2
  13092. 2
  13093. 2
  13094. 2
  13095. 2
  13096. 2
  13097. 2
  13098. 2
  13099. 2
  13100. 2
  13101. 2
  13102. 2
  13103. 2
  13104. 2
  13105. 2
  13106. 2
  13107. 2
  13108. 2
  13109. 2
  13110. 2
  13111. 2
  13112. 2
  13113. 2
  13114. 2
  13115. 2
  13116. 2
  13117. 2
  13118. 2
  13119. 2
  13120. 2
  13121. 2
  13122. 2
  13123. 2
  13124. 2
  13125. 2
  13126. 2
  13127. 2
  13128. 2
  13129. 2
  13130. 2
  13131. 2
  13132. 2
  13133. 2
  13134. 2
  13135. 2
  13136. 2
  13137. 2
  13138. 2
  13139. 2
  13140. 2
  13141. 2
  13142. 2
  13143. 2
  13144. 2
  13145. 2
  13146. 2
  13147. 2
  13148. 2
  13149. 2
  13150. 2
  13151. 2
  13152. 2
  13153. 2
  13154. 2
  13155. 2
  13156. 2
  13157. 2
  13158. 2
  13159. 2
  13160. 2
  13161. 2
  13162. 2
  13163. 2
  13164. 2
  13165. 2
  13166. 2
  13167. 2
  13168. 2
  13169. 2
  13170. 2
  13171. 2
  13172. 2
  13173. 2
  13174. 2
  13175. 2
  13176. 2
  13177. 2
  13178. 2
  13179. 2
  13180. 2
  13181. 2
  13182. 2
  13183. 2
  13184. 2
  13185. 2
  13186. 2
  13187. 2
  13188. 2
  13189. 2
  13190. 2
  13191. 2
  13192. 2
  13193. 2
  13194. 2
  13195. 2
  13196. 2
  13197. 2
  13198. 2
  13199. 2
  13200. 2
  13201. 2
  13202. 2
  13203. 2
  13204. 2
  13205. 2
  13206. 2
  13207. 2
  13208. 2
  13209. 2
  13210. 2
  13211. 2
  13212. 2
  13213. 2
  13214. 2
  13215. 2
  13216. 2
  13217. 2
  13218. 2
  13219. 2
  13220. 2
  13221. 2
  13222. 2
  13223. 2
  13224. 2
  13225. 2
  13226. 2
  13227.  @gardenjoy5223  Another thing: Putin is only playing the most commonly-played tune from the west’s songbook since about 1492. US invades China 1945-46 - OK US invades Korea 1950-53 - OK US invades China (again) 1950-53 - OK US invades Guatemala 1954 - OK US invades Indonesia 1958 - OK US invades Cuba 1959-60 - OK US invades Guatemala 1960 - OK US invades Belgian Congo 1964 - OK US invades Guatemala (again) 1964 - OK US invades Dominican Republic 1965-66 - OK US invades Peru 1965 - OK US invades Laos 1964-73 - OK US invades Vietnam 1961-73 - OK US invades Cambodia 1969-70 - OK US invades Guatemala (yet again) 1967-69 - OK US invades Lebanon 1982-84 - OK US invades Grenada 1983-84 - OK US invades Libya 1986 - OK US invades El Salvador 1981-92 - OK US invades Nicaragua 1981-90 - OK US invades Iran 1987-88 - OK US invades Libya (again) 1989 - OK US invades Panama 1989-90 - OK US invades Iraq 1991 - OK US invades Kuwait 1991 - OK US invades Somalia 1992-94 - OK US invades Bosnia 1995 - OK US invades Iran 1998 - OK US invades Sudan 1998 - OK US invades Afghanistan 1998 - OK US invades Yugoslavia – Serbia 1999 - OK US invades Afghanistan 2001 - OK US invades Iraq (again) 2003 - OK US invades Libya (yet again) 2011 - OK US invades Iraq (and yet again) and Syria 2014 – OK US invades Somalia 2011 – OK US invades Iran 2020 – OK Russia invades Ukraine 2022 - not OK America, and her partners, have a record Putin’s Russia can only dream of when it comes to invading other sovereign nations. The above list doesn’t include the dozens of times America has overturned democratically-elected governments and installed their proxy regimes to suit American self-interests. Including the US/CIA backed coup in Ukraine itself in 2014. It’s a fact that America has meddled in the affairs of virtually every sovereign nation on Earth at some point; some 180 countries. America, quite simply, has more innocent blood on her hands than any other nation on this planet.
    2
  13228. 2
  13229. 2
  13230. 2
  13231. 2
  13232. 2
  13233. 2
  13234. 2
  13235. 2
  13236. 2
  13237. 2
  13238. 2
  13239. 2
  13240. 2
  13241. 2
  13242. 2
  13243. 2
  13244. 2
  13245. 2
  13246. 2
  13247. 2
  13248. 2
  13249. 2
  13250. 2
  13251. 2
  13252. 2
  13253. 2
  13254. 2
  13255. 2
  13256. 2
  13257. 2
  13258. 2
  13259. 2
  13260. 2
  13261. 2
  13262. 2
  13263. 2
  13264. 2
  13265. 2
  13266. 2
  13267. 2
  13268. 2
  13269. 2
  13270. 2
  13271. 2
  13272. 2
  13273. 2
  13274. 2
  13275. 2
  13276. 2
  13277. 2
  13278. 2
  13279. 2
  13280. 2
  13281. 2
  13282. 2
  13283. 2
  13284. 2
  13285. 2
  13286. 2
  13287. 2
  13288. 2
  13289. 2
  13290. 2
  13291. 2
  13292. 2
  13293. 2
  13294. 2
  13295. 2
  13296. 2
  13297. 2
  13298. 2
  13299. 2
  13300. 2
  13301. 2
  13302. 2
  13303. 2
  13304. 2
  13305. 2
  13306. 2
  13307. 2
  13308. 2
  13309. Jordan Peterson’s 12 rules for life - an appraisal. Stand up straight with your shoulders straight. Unless you’re a peeping Tom and need to keep below that wall, otherwise that gorgeous, undressing next-door neighbour may spot you. Treat yourself like someone you are responsible for helping. In other words, pick up your own smelly socks, don’t litter, and make your own fucking bed! Befriend people who want the best for you. Well, this rests on your judgement of others’ character. If that’s shit, you’re fucked. Compare yourself to who you were yesterday, not the useless person you are today. This one totally contradicts the whole idea of self-improvement, for if I’m more useless today than I was yesterday, why am I even trying to self-improve?! Do not let your children do anything that makes you dislike them. Well, this assumes that you’re such an insane parental control freak with such a fascistic sense of keeping another in order that it’s not even worth considering, if only to save your own soul. Besides, kids need to make their own mistakes, so tough-titty if the parents can’t take this. Set your house in order before criticising the world. Well, if you’re a saint, perhaps. If you’re a messy flesh and blood human being then criticising the world is what gets most of us through the day, if the drugs aren’t working. Pursue what is meaningful, not what is expedient. Yeah, but that makes the enormous, unfounded assumption that any of this means anything whatsoever. Tell the truth, or at least don’t lie. I’m sorry, but that time my mother caught my porn stash under the bed, I had to lie and pin it on my twin brother, Tommy. Sometimes, lying just is the best policy and those who say otherwise are just liars. Assume the person you are listening to knows something you don’t. Ok. But this one falls down when it comes to my bank PIN number. Be precise in your speech. What ‘precise’ in one’s speech like Mr Jordan ‘why use 1 word when 21 will do?’ Peterson? Give me the conciseness of a Sam Harris any day. I’m sure Adam Sandler will concur. Do not bother children while they are skateboarding. Unless, that is, they are skateboarding all over your prize flowerbeds; then you can not only ‘bother’ them, but collar them and let them feel your hot garlicky breath on their cheeks. Pet a cat when you encounter one in the street. Unless, that is, the cat is frothing alarmingly at the mouth. Now where’s my publishing deal?😳
    2
  13310. 2
  13311. 2
  13312. 2
  13313. 2
  13314. 2
  13315. 2
  13316. 2
  13317. 2
  13318. Jordan Peterson’s 12 rules for life - an appraisal. Stand up straight with your shoulders straight. Unless you’re a peeping Tom and need to keep below that wall, otherwise that gorgeous, undressing next-door neighbour may spot you. Treat yourself like someone you are responsible for helping. In other words, pick up your own smelly socks, don’t litter, and make your own fucking bed! Befriend people who want the best for you. Well, this rests on your judgement of others’ character. If that’s shit, you’re fucked. Compare yourself to who you were yesterday, not the useless person you are today. This one totally contradicts the whole idea of self-improvement, for if I’m more useless today than I was yesterday, why am I even trying to self-improve?! Do not let your children do anything that makes you dislike them. Well, this assumes that you’re such an insane parental control freak with such a fascistic sense of keeping another in order that it’s not even worth considering, if only to save your own soul. Besides, kids need to make their own mistakes, so tough-titty if the parents can’t take this. Set your house in order before criticising the world. Well, if you’re a saint, perhaps. If you’re a messy flesh and blood human being then criticising the world is what gets most of us through the day, if the drugs aren’t working. Pursue what is meaningful, not what is expedient. Yeah, but that makes the enormous, unfounded assumption that any of this means anything whatsoever. Tell the truth, or at least don’t lie. I’m sorry, but that time my mother caught my porn stash under the bed, I had to lie and pin it on my twin brother, Tommy. Sometimes, lying just is the best policy and those who say otherwise are just liars. Assume the person you are listening to knows something you don’t. Ok. But this one falls down when it comes to my bank PIN number. Be precise in your speech. What ‘precise’ in one’s speech like Mr Jordan ‘why use 1 word when 21 will do?’ Peterson? Give me the conciseness of a Sam Harris any day. I’m sure Adam Sandler will concur. Do not bother children while they are skateboarding. Unless, that is, they are skateboarding all over your prize flowerbeds; then you can not only ‘bother’ them, but collar them and let them feel your hot garlicky breath on their cheeks. Pet a cat when you encounter one in the street. Unless, that is, the cat is frothing alarmingly at the mouth. Now where’s my publishing deal?😳
    2
  13319. 2
  13320. 2
  13321. 2
  13322. 2
  13323. 2
  13324. 2
  13325. 2
  13326. 2
  13327. 2
  13328. 1
  13329. 1
  13330. 1
  13331. 1
  13332. 1
  13333. 1
  13334. 1
  13335. 1
  13336. 1
  13337. 1
  13338. 1
  13339. 1
  13340. 1
  13341. 1
  13342. 1
  13343. 1
  13344. 1
  13345. 1
  13346. 1
  13347. 1
  13348. 1
  13349. 1
  13350. 1
  13351. 1
  13352. 1
  13353. 1
  13354. 1
  13355. 1
  13356. 1
  13357. 1
  13358. 1
  13359. 1
  13360. 1
  13361. 1
  13362. 1
  13363. 1
  13364. 1
  13365. 1
  13366. 1
  13367. 1
  13368. 1
  13369. 1
  13370. 1
  13371. 1
  13372. 1
  13373. 1
  13374. 1
  13375. 1
  13376. 1
  13377. 1
  13378. 1
  13379. 1
  13380. 1
  13381. 1
  13382. 1
  13383. 1
  13384. 1
  13385. 1
  13386. 1
  13387. 1
  13388. 1
  13389. 1
  13390. 1
  13391. 1
  13392. 1
  13393. 1
  13394. 1
  13395. 1
  13396. 1
  13397. 1
  13398. 1
  13399. 1
  13400. 1
  13401. 1
  13402.  @nixxxon18  Ok, I went to the very site you told me to and I did the calculations. The following is a direct quote from the site, and underneath is my working: *Number of stones per stone layer: Oskar M. Riedl [6] calculated the number of stones per stone layer if you take an average stone of 127 x 127 x 69cm (median height of 0.69m and median weight). He calculated in the first layer 32'000 stones (not including that there are less stones because of the rock outcropping), with 25'000 stone blocks in the 26th course, 20'000 stone blocks in the 46th course, 15'000 stone blocks in the 68th course, 10'000 stone blocks in the 95th course, 5'000 stone blocks in the 128th course, 1'000 stone blocks in the 174th course and 500 stone blocks in the 184th course.* So, 32,000 in first layer. 25,000 stones in 26th layer. So, between the first and 26th let’s say there’s an average of 28,000. So that’s 28,000 x 24 = 672,000 + 32,000 + 25,000 = 729,000 In 46th layer there are 20,000. Between the 26th layer and 46th layer let’s say an average of 22,000. So that’s 729,000. Add 18 x 22,000 = 396,000 + 20,000 + 25,000 = 441,000 So, we now can add 441,000 + 729,000 = 1,170,000 In the 68th layer we have 15,000. Between the 46th layer and 68th layer let’s say an average of 17,000. So that’s 17,000 x 20 = 340,000 + 20,000 + 15,000 = 375,000 So, 1,170,000 + 375,000 = 1,545,000 In the 95th layer we have 10,000. Between the 68th layer and 95th layer let’s say an average of 12,000. So that’s 12,000 x 25 = 300,000 + 15,000 + 10,000 = 325,000 So, 1,545,000 + 325,000 = 1,870,000 In the 128th layer we have 5,000. Between the 95th layer and 128th layer let’s say an average of 7,000. So that’s 7,000 x 31 = 217,000 + 10,000 + 5,000 = 232,000 So, 1,870,000 + 242,000 = 2,112,000 In the 174th layer we have 1,000. Between the 128th layer and the 174th layer let’s say an average of 3,000. So that’s 3,000 x 44 = 132,000 + 5,000 + 1,000 = 138,000 So, 2,112,000 + 138,000 = 2,250,000 In the 184th layer we have 500. Between the 174th layer and the 184th layer let’s say an average of 750. So that’s 750 x 8 = 6,000 + 1,000 + 500 = 7,500 So, 2,250,000 + 7,500 = 2,257,500 So, what did we say? 2.3 million? What did I calculate using the very site you directed me to? 2,257,500? Well, what’s 42,500 stones between friends! Looks like 2.3 million is pretty spot on mate. Nice try though. 👍
    1
  13403. 1
  13404. 1
  13405. 1
  13406. 1
  13407. 1
  13408. 1
  13409. 1
  13410. 1
  13411. 1
  13412. 1
  13413. 1
  13414. 1
  13415. 1
  13416. 1
  13417. 1
  13418. 1
  13419. 1
  13420. 1
  13421. 1
  13422. 1
  13423. 1
  13424. 1
  13425. 1
  13426. 1
  13427. 1
  13428. 1
  13429. 1
  13430. 1
  13431. 1
  13432. 1
  13433. 1
  13434. 1
  13435. 1
  13436. 1
  13437. 1
  13438. 1
  13439. 1
  13440. 1
  13441. 1
  13442. 1
  13443. 1
  13444. 1
  13445. 1
  13446. 1
  13447. 1
  13448. 1
  13449. 1
  13450. 1
  13451. 1
  13452. 1
  13453. 1
  13454. 1
  13455. 1
  13456. 1
  13457. 1
  13458. 1
  13459. 1
  13460. 1
  13461. 1
  13462. 1
  13463. 1
  13464. 1
  13465. 1
  13466. 1
  13467. 1
  13468. 1
  13469. 1
  13470. 1
  13471. 1
  13472. 1
  13473. 1
  13474. 1
  13475. 1
  13476. 1
  13477. 1
  13478. 1
  13479. 1
  13480. 1
  13481. 1
  13482. 1
  13483. 1
  13484. 1
  13485. 1
  13486. 1
  13487. 1
  13488. 1
  13489. 1
  13490. 1
  13491. 1
  13492. 1
  13493. 1
  13494. 1
  13495. 1
  13496. 1
  13497. 1
  13498. 1
  13499. 1
  13500. 1
  13501. 1
  13502. 1
  13503. 1
  13504. 1
  13505. 1
  13506. 1
  13507. 1
  13508. 1
  13509. 1
  13510. 1
  13511. 1
  13512. 1
  13513. 1
  13514. 1
  13515. 1
  13516. 1
  13517. 1
  13518. 1
  13519. 1
  13520. 1
  13521. 1
  13522. 1
  13523. 1
  13524. 1
  13525. 1
  13526. 1
  13527. 1
  13528. 1
  13529. 1
  13530. 1
  13531. 1
  13532. 1
  13533. 1
  13534. 1
  13535. 1
  13536. 1
  13537. 1
  13538. 1
  13539. 1
  13540. 1
  13541. 1
  13542. 1
  13543. 1
  13544. 1
  13545. 1
  13546. 1
  13547. 1
  13548. 1
  13549. 1
  13550. 1
  13551. 1
  13552. 1
  13553. 1
  13554. 1
  13555. 1
  13556. 1
  13557. 1
  13558. 1
  13559. 1
  13560. 1
  13561. 1
  13562. 1
  13563. 1
  13564. 1
  13565. 1
  13566. 1
  13567. 1
  13568. 1
  13569. 1
  13570. 1
  13571. 1
  13572. 1
  13573. 1
  13574. 1
  13575. 1
  13576. 1
  13577. 1
  13578. 1
  13579. 1
  13580. 1
  13581. 1
  13582. 1
  13583. 1
  13584. 1
  13585. 1
  13586. 1
  13587. 1
  13588. 1
  13589. 1
  13590. 1
  13591. 1
  13592. 1
  13593. 1
  13594. 1
  13595. 1
  13596. 1
  13597. 1
  13598. 1
  13599. 1
  13600. 1
  13601. 1
  13602. 1
  13603. 1
  13604. 1
  13605. 1
  13606. 1
  13607. 1
  13608. 1
  13609. 1
  13610. 1
  13611. 1
  13612. 1
  13613. 1
  13614. 1
  13615. 1
  13616. 1
  13617. 1
  13618. 1
  13619. 1
  13620. 1
  13621. 1
  13622. 1
  13623. 1
  13624. 1
  13625. 1
  13626. 1
  13627. 1
  13628. 1
  13629. 1
  13630. 1
  13631. 1
  13632. 1
  13633. 1
  13634. 1
  13635. 1
  13636. 1
  13637. 1
  13638. 1
  13639. 1
  13640. 1
  13641. 1
  13642. 1
  13643. 1
  13644. 1
  13645. 1
  13646. 1
  13647. 1
  13648. 1
  13649. 1
  13650. 1
  13651. 1
  13652. 1
  13653. 1
  13654. 1
  13655. 1
  13656. 1
  13657. 1
  13658. 1
  13659. 1
  13660. 1
  13661. 1
  13662. 1
  13663. 1
  13664. 1
  13665. 1
  13666. 1
  13667. 1
  13668. 1
  13669. 1
  13670. 1
  13671. 1
  13672. 1
  13673. 1
  13674. 1
  13675. 1
  13676. 1
  13677. 1
  13678. 1
  13679. 1
  13680. 1
  13681. 1
  13682. 1
  13683. 1
  13684. 1
  13685. 1
  13686. 1
  13687. 1
  13688. 1
  13689. 1
  13690. 1
  13691. 1
  13692. 1
  13693. 1
  13694. 1
  13695. 1
  13696. 1
  13697. 1
  13698. 1
  13699. 1
  13700. 1
  13701. 1
  13702. 1
  13703. 1
  13704. 1
  13705. 1
  13706. 1
  13707. 1
  13708. 1
  13709. 1
  13710. 1
  13711. 1
  13712. 1
  13713. 1
  13714. 1
  13715. 1
  13716. 1
  13717. 1
  13718. 1
  13719. 1
  13720. 1
  13721. 1
  13722. 1
  13723. 1
  13724. 1
  13725. 1
  13726. 1
  13727. 1
  13728. 1
  13729. 1
  13730. 1
  13731. 1
  13732. 1
  13733. 1
  13734. 1
  13735. 1
  13736. 1
  13737. 1
  13738. 1
  13739. 1
  13740. 1
  13741. 1
  13742. 1
  13743. 1
  13744. 1
  13745. 1
  13746. 1
  13747. 1
  13748. 1
  13749. 1
  13750. 1
  13751. 1
  13752. 1
  13753. 1
  13754. 1
  13755. 1
  13756. 1
  13757. 1
  13758. 1
  13759. 1
  13760. 1
  13761. 1
  13762. 1
  13763. 1
  13764. 1
  13765. 1
  13766. 1
  13767. 1
  13768. 1
  13769. 1
  13770. 1
  13771. 1
  13772. 1
  13773. 1
  13774. 1
  13775. 1
  13776. 1
  13777. 1
  13778. 1
  13779. 1
  13780. 1
  13781. 1
  13782. 1
  13783. 1
  13784. 1
  13785. 1
  13786. 1
  13787. 1
  13788. 1
  13789. 1
  13790. 1
  13791. 1
  13792. 1
  13793. 1
  13794. 1
  13795. 1
  13796. 1
  13797. 1
  13798. 1
  13799. 1
  13800. 1
  13801. 1
  13802. 1
  13803. 1
  13804. 1
  13805. 1
  13806. 1
  13807. 1
  13808. 1
  13809. 1
  13810. 1
  13811. 1
  13812. 1
  13813. 1
  13814. 1
  13815. 1
  13816. 1
  13817. 1
  13818. 1
  13819. 1
  13820. 1
  13821. 1
  13822. 1
  13823. 1
  13824. 1
  13825. 1
  13826. 1
  13827. 1
  13828. 1
  13829. 1
  13830. 1
  13831. 1
  13832. 1
  13833. 1
  13834. 1
  13835. 1
  13836. 1
  13837. 1
  13838. 1
  13839. 1
  13840. 1
  13841. 1
  13842. 1
  13843. 1
  13844. 1
  13845. 1
  13846. 1
  13847. 1
  13848. 1
  13849. 1
  13850. 1
  13851. 1
  13852. 1
  13853. 1
  13854. 1
  13855. 1
  13856. 1
  13857. 1
  13858. 1
  13859. 1
  13860. 1
  13861. 1
  13862. 1
  13863. 1
  13864. 1
  13865. 1
  13866. 1
  13867. 1
  13868. 1
  13869. 1
  13870. 1
  13871. 1
  13872. 1
  13873. 1
  13874. 1
  13875. 1
  13876. 1
  13877. 1
  13878. 1
  13879. 1
  13880. 1
  13881. 1
  13882. 1
  13883. 1
  13884. 1
  13885. 1
  13886. 1
  13887. 1
  13888. 1
  13889. 1
  13890. 1
  13891. 1
  13892. 1
  13893. 1
  13894. 1
  13895. 1
  13896. 1
  13897. 1
  13898. 1
  13899. 1
  13900. 1
  13901. 1
  13902. 1
  13903. 1
  13904. 1
  13905. 1
  13906. 1
  13907. 1
  13908. The greatest problem humanity faces, and has always faced, is one of perspective. We have narrowed our vision such that are unable to see the universal wood for the exclusive trees. We have hitched our star to this or that family, clan, tribe, nationalism, religion, such that have become deluded, unable to serenely see what actually is. We are cosmic dust on a grain of sand, one of trillions of grains of sand, whirling around a nuclear reactor, one of trillions of nuclear reactors, and we are willing to abase ourselves to murdering one another for an accident of birth, or an imagined daddy in the sky? Has it come to this? There are alien civilisations who use this Earth as a cosmic pit stop on their intergalactic travels and they look at us and weep. They have perspective. They can literally see the Earth in toto. They cannot see the pettifogging, sanguinary squabbles over this or that imaginary line drawn on a map. They cannot see the ignorant ranters championing their imagined God, ranked against the ignorant ranters championing their imaginary God. The solution to all this nonsense is very simple. Expand your terms of self-definition. Refuse to accept a random, arbitrary accident of birth as a salient marker of your identity. Refuse to accept unthought-out shibboleths handed down to you to shore up your fear of death. Refuse to be proud, unless your pride is grounded in self-motivated, self-guided achievement, and not some random, bizarre, nonsensical ‘pride’ based on the fact your mother happened to plop you out here, and not there. None of this would matter a fig, but for a key point: we now, at this critical juncture in our cosmic journey, face the very real and present danger of incinerating this planet and everything on it. Really. We are better than that.😳
    1
  13909. 1
  13910. 1
  13911. 1
  13912. 1
  13913. 1
  13914. 1
  13915. 1
  13916. 1
  13917. 1
  13918. 1
  13919. 1
  13920. 1
  13921. 1
  13922. 1
  13923. 1
  13924. 1
  13925. 1
  13926. 1
  13927. 1
  13928. 1
  13929. 1
  13930. 1
  13931. 1
  13932. 1
  13933. 1
  13934. 1
  13935. 1
  13936. 1
  13937. 1
  13938. 1
  13939. 1
  13940. 1
  13941. 1
  13942. 1
  13943. 1
  13944. 1
  13945. 1
  13946. 1
  13947. 1
  13948. 1
  13949. 1
  13950. 1
  13951. 1
  13952. 1
  13953. 1
  13954. 1
  13955. 1
  13956. 1
  13957. 1
  13958. 1
  13959. 1
  13960. 1
  13961. 1
  13962. 1
  13963. 1
  13964. 1
  13965. 1
  13966. 1
  13967. 1
  13968. 1
  13969. 1
  13970. 1
  13971. 1
  13972. 1
  13973. 1
  13974. 1
  13975. 1
  13976. 1
  13977. 1
  13978. 1
  13979. 1
  13980. 1
  13981. 1
  13982. 1
  13983. 1
  13984. 1
  13985. 1
  13986. 1
  13987. 1
  13988. 1
  13989. 1
  13990. 1
  13991. 1
  13992. 1
  13993. 1
  13994. 1
  13995. 1
  13996. 1
  13997. 1
  13998. 1
  13999. 1
  14000. 1
  14001. 1
  14002. 1
  14003. 1
  14004. 1
  14005. 1
  14006. 1
  14007. 1
  14008. 1
  14009. 1
  14010. 1
  14011. 1
  14012. 1
  14013. 1
  14014. 1
  14015. 1
  14016. 1
  14017. 1
  14018. 1
  14019. 1
  14020. 1
  14021. 1
  14022. 1
  14023. 1
  14024. 1
  14025. 1
  14026. 1
  14027. 1
  14028. 1
  14029. 1
  14030. 1
  14031. 1
  14032. 1
  14033. 1
  14034. 1
  14035. 1
  14036. 1
  14037. 1
  14038. 1
  14039. 1
  14040. 1
  14041. 1
  14042. 1
  14043. 1
  14044. 1
  14045. 1
  14046. 1
  14047. 1
  14048. 1
  14049. 1
  14050. 1
  14051. 1
  14052. 1
  14053. 1
  14054. 1
  14055. 1
  14056. 1
  14057. 1
  14058. 1
  14059. 1
  14060. 1
  14061. 1
  14062. 1
  14063. 1
  14064. 1
  14065. 1
  14066. 1
  14067. 1
  14068. 1
  14069. 1
  14070. 1
  14071. 1
  14072. 1
  14073. 1
  14074. 1
  14075. 1
  14076. 1
  14077. 1
  14078. 1
  14079. 1
  14080. 1
  14081. 1
  14082. 1
  14083. 1
  14084. 1
  14085. 1
  14086. 1
  14087. 1
  14088. 1
  14089. 1
  14090. 1
  14091. 1
  14092. 1
  14093. 1
  14094. 1
  14095. 1
  14096. 1
  14097. 1
  14098. 1
  14099. 1
  14100. 1
  14101. 1
  14102. 1
  14103. 1
  14104. 1
  14105. 1
  14106. 1
  14107. 1
  14108. 1
  14109. 1
  14110. 1
  14111. 1
  14112. 1
  14113. 1
  14114. 1
  14115. 1
  14116. 1
  14117. 1
  14118. 1
  14119. 1
  14120. 1
  14121. 1
  14122. 1
  14123. 1
  14124. 1
  14125. 1
  14126. 1
  14127. 1
  14128. 1
  14129. 1
  14130. 1
  14131. 1
  14132. 1
  14133. 1
  14134. 1
  14135. 1
  14136. 1
  14137. 1
  14138. 1
  14139. 1
  14140. 1
  14141. 1
  14142. 1
  14143. 1
  14144. 1
  14145. 1
  14146. 1
  14147. 1
  14148. 1
  14149. 1
  14150. 1
  14151. 1
  14152. 1
  14153. 1
  14154. 1
  14155. 1
  14156. 1
  14157. 1
  14158. 1
  14159. 1
  14160. 1
  14161. 1
  14162. 1
  14163. 1
  14164. 1
  14165. 1
  14166. 1
  14167. 1
  14168. 1
  14169. 1
  14170. 1
  14171. 1
  14172. 1
  14173. 1
  14174. 1
  14175. 1
  14176. 1
  14177. 1
  14178. 1
  14179. 1
  14180. 1
  14181. 1
  14182. 1
  14183. 1
  14184. 1
  14185. 1
  14186. 1
  14187. 1
  14188. 1
  14189. 1
  14190. 1
  14191. 1
  14192. 1
  14193. 1
  14194. 1
  14195. 1
  14196. 1
  14197. 1
  14198. 1
  14199. 1
  14200. 1
  14201. 1
  14202. 1
  14203. 1
  14204. 1
  14205. 1
  14206. 1
  14207. 1
  14208. 1
  14209. 1
  14210. 1
  14211. 1
  14212. 1
  14213. 1
  14214. 1
  14215. 1
  14216. 1
  14217. 1
  14218. 1
  14219. 1
  14220. 1
  14221. 1
  14222. 1
  14223. 1
  14224. 1
  14225. 1
  14226. 1
  14227. 1
  14228. 1
  14229. 1
  14230. 1
  14231. 1
  14232. 1
  14233. 1
  14234. 1
  14235. 1
  14236. 1
  14237. 1
  14238. 1
  14239. 1
  14240. 1
  14241. 1
  14242. 1
  14243. 1
  14244. 1
  14245. 1
  14246. 1
  14247. 1
  14248. 1
  14249. 1
  14250. 1
  14251. 1
  14252. 1
  14253. 1
  14254. 1
  14255. 1
  14256. 1
  14257. 1
  14258. 1
  14259. 1
  14260. 1
  14261. 1
  14262. 1
  14263. 1
  14264. 1
  14265. 1
  14266. 1
  14267. 1
  14268. 1
  14269. 1
  14270. 1
  14271. 1
  14272. 1
  14273. 1
  14274. 1
  14275. 1
  14276. 1
  14277. 1
  14278. 1
  14279. 1
  14280. 1
  14281. 1
  14282. 1
  14283. 1
  14284. 1
  14285. 1
  14286. 1
  14287. 1
  14288. 1
  14289. 1
  14290. 1
  14291. 1
  14292. 1
  14293. 1
  14294. 1
  14295. 1
  14296. 1
  14297. 1
  14298. 1
  14299. 1
  14300. 1
  14301. 1
  14302. 1
  14303. 1
  14304. 1
  14305. 1
  14306. 1
  14307. 1
  14308. 1
  14309. 1
  14310. 1
  14311. 1
  14312. 1
  14313. 1
  14314. 1
  14315. 1
  14316. 1
  14317. 1
  14318. 1
  14319. 1
  14320. 1
  14321. 1
  14322. 1
  14323. 1
  14324. 1
  14325. 1
  14326. 1
  14327. 1
  14328. 1
  14329. 1
  14330. 1
  14331. 1
  14332. 1
  14333. 1
  14334. 1
  14335. 1
  14336. 1
  14337. 1
  14338. 1
  14339. 1
  14340. 1
  14341. 1
  14342. 1
  14343. 1
  14344. 1
  14345. 1
  14346. 1
  14347. 1
  14348. 1
  14349. 1
  14350. 1
  14351. 1
  14352. 1
  14353. 1
  14354. 1
  14355. 1
  14356. 1
  14357. 1
  14358. 1
  14359. 1
  14360. 1
  14361. 1
  14362. 1
  14363. 1
  14364. 1
  14365. 1
  14366. 1
  14367. 1
  14368. 1
  14369. 1
  14370. 1
  14371. 1
  14372. 1
  14373. 1
  14374. 1
  14375. 1
  14376. 1
  14377. 1
  14378. 1
  14379. 1
  14380. 1
  14381. 1
  14382. 1
  14383. 1
  14384. 1
  14385. 1
  14386. 1
  14387. 1
  14388. 1
  14389. 1
  14390. 1
  14391. 1
  14392. 1
  14393. 1
  14394. 1
  14395. 1
  14396. 1
  14397. 1
  14398. 1
  14399. 1
  14400. 1
  14401. 1
  14402. 1
  14403. 1
  14404. 1
  14405. 1
  14406. 1
  14407. 1
  14408. 1
  14409. 1
  14410. 1
  14411. 1
  14412. 1
  14413. 1
  14414. 1
  14415. 1
  14416. 1
  14417. 1
  14418. 1
  14419. 1
  14420. 1
  14421. 1
  14422. 1
  14423. 1
  14424. 1
  14425. 1
  14426. 1
  14427. 1
  14428. 1
  14429. 1
  14430. 1
  14431. 1
  14432. 1
  14433. 1
  14434. 1
  14435. 1
  14436. 1
  14437. 1
  14438. 1
  14439. 1
  14440. 1
  14441. 1
  14442. 1
  14443. 1
  14444. 1
  14445. 1
  14446. 1
  14447. 1
  14448. 1
  14449. 1
  14450. 1
  14451. 1
  14452. 1
  14453. 1
  14454. 1
  14455. 1
  14456. 1
  14457. 1
  14458. 1
  14459. 1
  14460. 1
  14461. 1
  14462. 1
  14463. 1
  14464. 1
  14465. 1
  14466. 1
  14467. 1
  14468. 1
  14469. 1
  14470. 1
  14471. 1
  14472. 1
  14473. 1
  14474. 1
  14475. 1
  14476. 1
  14477. 1
  14478. 1
  14479. 1
  14480. 1
  14481. 1
  14482. 1
  14483. 1
  14484. 1
  14485. 1
  14486. 1
  14487. 1
  14488. 1
  14489. 1
  14490. 1
  14491. 1
  14492. While observing the bedlam being played out daily on our screens, I couldn’t help but be struck by how eerily similar this whole farrago is to Kubrick’s Dr Strangelove , with a slight tweaking of point-of-view, and flipping of roles, in which America is Russia and Russia is America. In Kubrick’s masterpiece, American Brigadier General Jack D Ripper (Putin), has been driven insane with paranoia by the events of the Cold War. (In Putin’s case insanity and monomaniacal post-Cold War paranoia at a loss and diminution of his beloved Russia, as was USSR.) Ripper has become convinced that there is a plot by the ‘Commies’ (USA/NATO in Putin’s case) to ‘sap and contaminate our precious bodily fluids’. (In Putin’s case to sap and contaminate the minds of the Russians, and the idea of a Greater Russian Empire.) Ripper decides to take pre-emptive, first-strike unilateral action by striking the USSR. (Putin’s pre-emptive strike on Ukraine, and by extension the West in general.) The B-52s, under Ripper’s command, go in and hydrogen bomb the USSR. (Mercifully, Putin has not yet gone this far.) The US president along with his back-room staff attempt to stop the bombers from delivering their payload. (We can only pray Putin has back-room staff strong enough and prepared to step in if he tries to fulfill his nuclear threat.) Here’s the rub, however, the only way to stop the bombers in Dr Strangelove ,is a recall code which only Ripper knows. (We must pray, even the atheists/agnostics amongst us, that with Putin, it’s not only him that has access to the button.) The US government tries to capture Ripper to get the recall code from him, but Ripper gets away. (Will we be able to stop Putin?) The really scary kicker in Kubrick’s film, however, is that the Soviets have built a doomsday machine that will launch enough missiles to destroy all life on Earth if an American nuclear bomb hits them. (I’m pretty confident Putin’s enemies - us - won’t go this far.) Eventually, Ripper is overpowered, but shoots himself before the recall code can be given. (An inside job on Putin, perhaps, before he can incinerate the planet?) One man ignores the recall code and piles headlong towards Moscow. (A member of Putin’s inner team, perhaps?) He attempts to drop the bomb. (On Ukraine? On Europe? On America?) After some door-jamming black humour he opens the doors and rides down on the bomb. 💣 Moscow retaliates with horrifying consequences for the planet. (Surely the West won’t go this far.) Let’s hope that, in this case, life won’t imitate art.👀
    1
  14493. 1
  14494. 1
  14495. 1
  14496. 1
  14497. 1
  14498. 1
  14499. 1
  14500. 1
  14501. 1
  14502. 1
  14503. 1
  14504. 1
  14505. 1
  14506. 1
  14507. 1
  14508. 1
  14509. 1
  14510. 1
  14511. 1
  14512. 1
  14513. 1
  14514. 1
  14515. 1
  14516. 1
  14517. 1
  14518. 1
  14519. 1
  14520. 1
  14521. 1
  14522. 1
  14523. 1
  14524. 1
  14525. 1
  14526. 1
  14527. 1
  14528. 1
  14529. 1
  14530. 1
  14531. 1
  14532. 1
  14533. 1
  14534. 1
  14535. 1
  14536. 1
  14537. 1
  14538. 1
  14539. 1
  14540. 1
  14541. 1
  14542. 1
  14543. 1
  14544. 1
  14545. 1
  14546. 1
  14547. 1
  14548. 1
  14549. 1
  14550. 1
  14551. 1
  14552. 1
  14553. 1
  14554. 1
  14555. 1
  14556. 1
  14557. 1
  14558. 1
  14559. 1
  14560. 1
  14561. 1
  14562. 1
  14563. 1
  14564. 1
  14565. 1
  14566. 1
  14567. 1
  14568. 1
  14569. 1
  14570. 1
  14571. 1
  14572. 1
  14573. 1
  14574. 1
  14575. 1
  14576. 1
  14577. 1
  14578. 1
  14579. 1
  14580. 1
  14581. 1
  14582. 1
  14583. 1
  14584. 1
  14585. 1
  14586. 1
  14587. 1
  14588. 1
  14589. 1
  14590. 1
  14591. 1
  14592. 1
  14593. 1
  14594. 1
  14595. 1
  14596. 1
  14597. 1
  14598. 1
  14599. 1
  14600. 1
  14601. 1
  14602. 1
  14603. 1
  14604. 1
  14605. 1
  14606. 1
  14607. 1
  14608. 1
  14609. 1
  14610. 1
  14611. 1
  14612. 1
  14613. 1
  14614. 1
  14615. 1
  14616. 1
  14617. 1
  14618. 1
  14619. 1
  14620. 1
  14621. 1
  14622. 1
  14623. 1
  14624. 1
  14625. 1
  14626. 1
  14627. 1
  14628. 1
  14629. 1
  14630. 1
  14631. 1
  14632. 1
  14633. 1
  14634. 1
  14635. 1
  14636. 1
  14637. 1
  14638. 1
  14639. 1
  14640. 1
  14641. 1
  14642. 1
  14643. 1
  14644. 1
  14645. 1
  14646. 1
  14647. 1
  14648. 1
  14649. 1
  14650. 1
  14651. 1
  14652. 1
  14653. 1
  14654. 1
  14655. 1
  14656. 1
  14657. 1
  14658. 1
  14659. 1
  14660. 1
  14661. 1
  14662. 1
  14663. 1
  14664. 1
  14665. 1
  14666. 1
  14667. 1
  14668. 1
  14669. 1
  14670. 1
  14671. 1
  14672. 1
  14673. 1
  14674. 1
  14675. 1
  14676. 1
  14677. 1
  14678. 1
  14679. 1
  14680. 1
  14681. 1
  14682. 1
  14683. 1
  14684. 1
  14685. 1
  14686. 1
  14687. 1
  14688. 1
  14689. 1
  14690. 1
  14691. 1
  14692. 1
  14693. 1
  14694. 1
  14695. 1
  14696. 1
  14697. 1
  14698. 1
  14699. 1
  14700. 1
  14701. 1
  14702. 1
  14703. 1
  14704. 1
  14705. 1
  14706. 1
  14707. 1
  14708. 1
  14709. 1
  14710. 1
  14711. 1
  14712. 1
  14713. 1
  14714. 1
  14715. 1
  14716. 1
  14717. 1
  14718. 1
  14719. 1
  14720. 1
  14721. 1
  14722. 1
  14723.  @niblet112  While the Americans have blood on their hands all down their timeline since 1620, to call Putin a ‘pussycat’ is stretching the credibility of even the most non-tendentious of onlookers. He expunges enemies with impunity. The list of people suspected murdered on orders from the Russian leader or people close to him is long. He imprisons dissenters without a second thought. According to a list from Russian human-rights group Memorial, there were 102 people held in Russian prisons for their political beliefs as of 2016. In this, Putin’s Russia was continuing Tsarist and Soviet traditions, sending political dissenters to Siberia or to work camps as in Stalinist days. He occupies foreign territory. He annexed Crimea in 2014 and started sponsoring rebels in eastern Ukraine. He quashes opposition ruthlessly, as befitting the dictator for par excellence. Russia has suppressed political opposition using an arsenal of techniques. These range from laws limiting free assembly and other civil rights 3, to jailing protestors for vague offenses such as “hooliganism,” to using the notoriously corrupt courts to convict opponents of embezzlement or tax fraud, to straightforward police intimidation, as well as murder. Prominent opponents have been forced into silence or exile. He abets some of the world’s most egregious bloodshed. For example, seeking to gain influence in the Middle East, Putin supported the murderous regime of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, in what was then the deadliest war of the 21st century. Russia’s military help was priceless to Assad. Western powers and the UN accused the alliance of indiscriminately targeting civilians. And now he’s just launched a merciless offensive against a self-governing sovereign territory, while threatening the rest of us with nuclear annihilation into the bargain. Pussy cat? Nah. 🐈‍⬛
    1
  14724. 1
  14725. 1
  14726. 1
  14727. 1
  14728. 1
  14729. 1
  14730. 1
  14731. 1
  14732. 1
  14733. 1
  14734. 1
  14735. 1
  14736. 1
  14737. 1
  14738. 1
  14739. 1
  14740. 1
  14741. 1
  14742. 1
  14743. 1
  14744. 1
  14745. 1
  14746. 1
  14747. 1
  14748. 1
  14749. 1
  14750. 1
  14751. 1
  14752. 1
  14753. 1
  14754. 1
  14755. 1
  14756. 1
  14757. 1
  14758. 1
  14759. 1
  14760. 1
  14761. 1
  14762. 1
  14763. 1
  14764. 1
  14765. 1
  14766. 1
  14767. 1
  14768. 1
  14769. 1
  14770. 1
  14771. 1
  14772. 1
  14773. 1
  14774. 1
  14775. 1
  14776. 1
  14777. 1
  14778. 1
  14779. 1
  14780. 1
  14781. 1
  14782. 1
  14783. 1
  14784. 1
  14785. 1
  14786. 1
  14787. 1
  14788. 1
  14789. 1
  14790. 1
  14791. 1
  14792. 1
  14793. 1
  14794. 1
  14795. 1
  14796. 1
  14797. 1
  14798. 1
  14799. 1
  14800. 1
  14801. 1
  14802. 1
  14803. 1
  14804. 1
  14805. 1
  14806. 1
  14807. 1
  14808. 1
  14809. 1
  14810. 1
  14811. 1
  14812. 1
  14813. 1
  14814. 1
  14815. 1
  14816. 1
  14817. 1
  14818. 1
  14819. 1
  14820. 1
  14821. 1
  14822. 1
  14823. 1
  14824. 1
  14825. 1
  14826. 1
  14827. 1
  14828. 1
  14829. 1
  14830. 1
  14831. 1
  14832. 1
  14833. 1
  14834. 1
  14835. 1
  14836. 1
  14837. 1
  14838. 1
  14839. 1
  14840. 1
  14841. 1
  14842. 1
  14843. 1
  14844. 1
  14845. 1
  14846. 1
  14847. 1
  14848. 1
  14849. 1
  14850. 1
  14851. 1
  14852. 1
  14853. 1
  14854. 1
  14855. 1
  14856. 1
  14857. 1
  14858. 1
  14859. 1
  14860. 1
  14861. 1
  14862. 1
  14863. 1
  14864. 1
  14865. 1
  14866. 1
  14867. 1
  14868. 1
  14869. 1
  14870. 1
  14871. 1
  14872. 1
  14873. 1
  14874. 1
  14875. 1
  14876. 1
  14877. 1
  14878. 1
  14879. 1
  14880. 1
  14881. 1
  14882. 1
  14883. 1
  14884. 1
  14885. 1
  14886. 1
  14887. 1
  14888. 1
  14889. 1
  14890. 1
  14891. 1
  14892. 1
  14893. 1
  14894. 1
  14895. 1
  14896. 1
  14897. 1
  14898. 1
  14899. 1
  14900. 1
  14901. 1
  14902. 1
  14903. 1
  14904. 1
  14905. 1
  14906. 1
  14907. 1
  14908. 1
  14909. 1
  14910. 1
  14911. 1
  14912. 1
  14913. 1
  14914. 1
  14915. 1
  14916. 1
  14917. 1
  14918. 1
  14919. 1
  14920. 1
  14921. 1
  14922. 1
  14923. 1
  14924. 1
  14925. 1
  14926. 1
  14927. 1
  14928. 1
  14929. 1
  14930. 1
  14931. 1
  14932. 1
  14933. 1
  14934. 1
  14935. 1
  14936. 1
  14937. 1
  14938. 1
  14939. 1
  14940. 1
  14941. 1
  14942. 1
  14943. 1
  14944. 1
  14945. 1
  14946. 1
  14947. 1
  14948. 1
  14949. 1
  14950. 1
  14951. 1
  14952. 1
  14953. 1
  14954. 1
  14955. 1
  14956. 1
  14957. 1
  14958. 1
  14959. 1
  14960. 1
  14961. 1
  14962. 1
  14963. 1
  14964. 1
  14965. 1
  14966. 1
  14967. 1
  14968. 1
  14969. 1
  14970. 1
  14971. 1
  14972. 1
  14973. 1
  14974. 1
  14975. 1
  14976. 1
  14977. 1
  14978. 1
  14979. 1
  14980. 1
  14981. 1
  14982. 1
  14983. 1
  14984. 1
  14985. 1
  14986. 1
  14987. 1
  14988. 1
  14989. 1
  14990. 1
  14991. 1
  14992. 1
  14993. 1
  14994. 1
  14995. 1
  14996. 1
  14997. 1
  14998. 1
  14999. 1
  15000. 1
  15001. 1
  15002. 1
  15003. 1
  15004. 1
  15005. 1
  15006. 1
  15007. 1
  15008.  @elcristoph7380  Look, I’ll make this simple for you. Buckle in. Frankly, no idea why anyone else should be butting in with what a woman does with her own body. It’s her choice. Simply no one else’s business. Those who bore on about the “rights of the unborn” seem to be overestimating human life. I’m willing to bet that if you ask 100 people randomly whether they would have wanted to be born (knowing what we do as humans), the vast majority of them would decline the offer. Invariably, it’s those holy rollers who adhere to primitive scriptures written by men thousands of years ago who cause all the trouble here. It’s no accident that abortion rights are such a hot topic in the US, a country with an alarmingly high belief in invisible daddies in the sky. Preventing legal access to abortion doesn’t stop abortions from happening, it just prevents safe abortions as women will seek dangerous underground methods if the legal option is denied them. Another thing that’s always confused me in this debate is how the pro-lifers in the US are oh so keen to “protect the life of the unborn” by denying legal access to abortion, but are quite free and easy with the lives of the born, and are all for any Tom, Dick or Dirty Harry buying a gun like they’re buying candy from a store and going out and shooting up a school every other week. Seems like there’s a contradiction there. Personally, my only issue with abortion is pain. Does the unborn foetus feel pain? On this basis, it should be done as early as possible in the gestation but the bottom line here is simple: it’s a woman’s right to choose what she does with her own body.
    1
  15009. 1
  15010. 1
  15011. 1
  15012. 1
  15013. 1
  15014. 1
  15015. 1
  15016. 1
  15017. 1
  15018. 1
  15019. 1
  15020. 1
  15021. 1
  15022. 1
  15023. 1
  15024. 1
  15025. 1
  15026. 1
  15027. 1
  15028. 1
  15029. 1
  15030. 1
  15031. 1
  15032. 1
  15033. 1
  15034. 1
  15035. 1
  15036. 1
  15037. 1
  15038. 1
  15039. 1
  15040. 1
  15041. 1
  15042. 1
  15043. 1
  15044. 1
  15045. 1
  15046. 1
  15047. 1
  15048. 1
  15049. 1
  15050. 1
  15051. 1
  15052. 1
  15053. 1
  15054. 1
  15055. 1
  15056. 1
  15057. 1
  15058. 1
  15059. 1
  15060. 1
  15061. 1
  15062. 1
  15063. 1
  15064. 1
  15065. 1
  15066. 1
  15067. 1
  15068. 1
  15069. 1
  15070. 1
  15071. 1
  15072. 1
  15073. 1
  15074. 1
  15075. 1
  15076. 1
  15077. 1
  15078. 1
  15079. 1
  15080. 1
  15081. 1
  15082. 1
  15083. 1
  15084. 1
  15085. 1
  15086. 1
  15087. 1
  15088. 1
  15089. 1
  15090. 1
  15091. 1
  15092. 1
  15093. 1
  15094. 1
  15095. 1
  15096. 1
  15097. 1
  15098. 1
  15099. 1
  15100. 1
  15101. 1
  15102. 1
  15103. 1
  15104. 1
  15105. 1
  15106. 1
  15107. 1
  15108. 1
  15109. 1
  15110. 1
  15111. 1
  15112. 1
  15113. 1
  15114. 1
  15115. 1
  15116. 1
  15117. 1
  15118. 1
  15119. 1
  15120. 1
  15121. 1
  15122. 1
  15123. 1
  15124. 1
  15125. 1
  15126. 1
  15127. 1
  15128. 1
  15129. 1
  15130. 1
  15131. 1
  15132. 1
  15133. 1
  15134. 1
  15135. 1
  15136. 1
  15137. 1
  15138. 1
  15139. 1
  15140. 1
  15141. 1
  15142. 1
  15143. 1
  15144. 1
  15145. 1
  15146. 1
  15147. 1
  15148. 1
  15149. 1
  15150. 1
  15151. 1
  15152. 1
  15153. 1
  15154. 1
  15155. 1
  15156. 1
  15157. 1
  15158. 1
  15159. 1
  15160. 1
  15161. 1
  15162. 1
  15163. 1
  15164. 1
  15165. 1
  15166. 1
  15167. 1
  15168. 1
  15169. 1
  15170. 1
  15171. 1
  15172. 1
  15173. 1
  15174. 1
  15175. 1
  15176. 1
  15177. 1
  15178. 1
  15179. 1
  15180. 1
  15181. 1
  15182. 1
  15183. 1
  15184. 1
  15185. 1
  15186. 1
  15187. 1
  15188. 1
  15189. 1
  15190. 1
  15191. 1
  15192. 1
  15193. 1
  15194. 1
  15195. 1
  15196. 1
  15197. 1
  15198. 1
  15199. 1
  15200. 1
  15201. 1
  15202. 1
  15203. 1
  15204. 1
  15205. 1
  15206. 1
  15207. 1
  15208. 1
  15209. 1
  15210. 1
  15211. 1
  15212. 1
  15213. 1
  15214. 1
  15215. 1
  15216. 1
  15217. 1
  15218. 1
  15219. 1
  15220. 1
  15221. 1
  15222. 1
  15223. 1
  15224. 1
  15225. 1
  15226. 1
  15227. 1
  15228. 1
  15229. 1
  15230. 1
  15231. 1
  15232. 1
  15233. 1
  15234. 1
  15235. 1
  15236. 1
  15237. 1
  15238. 1
  15239. 1
  15240. 1
  15241. 1
  15242. 1
  15243. 1
  15244. 1
  15245. 1
  15246. 1
  15247. 1
  15248. 1
  15249. 1
  15250. 1
  15251. 1
  15252. 1
  15253. 1
  15254. 1
  15255. 1
  15256. 1
  15257. 1
  15258. 1
  15259. 1
  15260. 1
  15261. 1
  15262. 1
  15263. 1
  15264. 1
  15265. 1
  15266. 1
  15267. 1
  15268. 1
  15269. 1
  15270. 1
  15271. 1
  15272. 1
  15273. 1
  15274. 1
  15275. 1
  15276. 1
  15277. 1
  15278. 1
  15279. 1
  15280. 1
  15281. 1
  15282. 1
  15283. 1
  15284. 1
  15285. 1
  15286. 1
  15287. 1
  15288. 1
  15289. 1
  15290. 1
  15291. 1
  15292. 1
  15293. 1
  15294. 1
  15295. 1
  15296. 1
  15297. 1
  15298. 1
  15299. 1
  15300. 1
  15301. 1
  15302. 1
  15303. 1
  15304. 1
  15305. 1
  15306. 1
  15307. 1
  15308. 1
  15309. 1
  15310. 1
  15311. 1
  15312. 1
  15313. 1
  15314. 1
  15315. 1
  15316. 1
  15317. 1
  15318. 1
  15319. 1
  15320. 1
  15321. 1
  15322. 1
  15323. 1
  15324. 1
  15325. 1
  15326. 1
  15327. 1
  15328. 1
  15329. 1
  15330. 1
  15331. 1
  15332. 1
  15333. 1
  15334. 1
  15335. 1
  15336. 1
  15337. 1
  15338. 1
  15339. 1
  15340. 1
  15341. 1
  15342. 1
  15343. 1
  15344. 1
  15345. 1
  15346. 1
  15347. 1
  15348. 1
  15349. 1
  15350. 1
  15351. 1
  15352. 1
  15353. 1
  15354. 1
  15355. 1
  15356. 1
  15357. 1
  15358. 1
  15359. 1
  15360. 1
  15361. 1
  15362. 1
  15363. 1
  15364. 1
  15365. 1
  15366. 1
  15367. 1
  15368. 1
  15369. 1
  15370. 1
  15371. 1
  15372. 1
  15373. 1
  15374. 1
  15375. 1
  15376. 1
  15377. 1
  15378. 1
  15379. 1
  15380. 1
  15381. 1
  15382. 1
  15383. 1
  15384. 1
  15385. 1
  15386. 1
  15387. 1
  15388. 1
  15389. 1
  15390. 1
  15391. 1
  15392. 1
  15393. 1
  15394. 1
  15395. 1
  15396. 1
  15397. 1
  15398. 1
  15399. 1
  15400. 1
  15401. 1
  15402. 1
  15403. 1
  15404. 1
  15405. 1
  15406. 1
  15407. 1
  15408. 1
  15409. 1
  15410. 1
  15411. 1
  15412. 1
  15413. 1
  15414. 1
  15415. 1
  15416. 1
  15417. 1
  15418. 1
  15419. 1
  15420. 1
  15421. 1
  15422. 1
  15423. 1
  15424. 1
  15425. 1
  15426. 1
  15427. 1
  15428. 1
  15429. 1
  15430. 1
  15431. 1
  15432. 1
  15433. 1
  15434. 1
  15435. 1
  15436. 1
  15437. 1
  15438. 1
  15439. 1
  15440. 1
  15441. 1
  15442. 1
  15443. 1
  15444. 1
  15445. 1
  15446. 1
  15447. 1
  15448. 1
  15449. 1
  15450. 1
  15451. 1
  15452. 1
  15453. 1
  15454. 1
  15455. 1
  15456. 1
  15457. 1
  15458. 1
  15459. 1
  15460. 1
  15461. 1
  15462. 1
  15463. 1
  15464. 1
  15465. 1
  15466. 1
  15467.  @gemm4793  Remind me never to knock on your door if I’m ever in a pickle. I’m afraid you might ask me if I’m ‘born and bred’ before you deign to help me. Last time I checked we were all born and bred on planet Earth. The greatest problem humanity faces, and has always faced is one of perspective. We have narrowed our vision such that are unable to see the universal wood for the exclusive trees. We have hitched our star to this or that family, clan, tribe, nationalism, religion such that we have become deluded, unable to serenely see what actually is. We are cosmic dust on a grain of sand, one of trillions of grains of sand, whirling around a nuclear reactor, one of trillions of nuclear reactors and we are willing to abase ourselves to murdering one another for an accident of birth, or an imagined daddy in the sky? Has it come to this? There are alien civilisations who use this Earth as a cosmic pit stop on their intergalactic travels and they look at us and weep. They have perspective. They can literally see the Earth in toto. They cannot see the pettifogging, sanguinary squabbles over this or that imaginary line drawn on a map. They cannot see the ignorant ranters championing their imagined God, ranked against the ignorant ranters championing their imaginary God. The solution to all this nonsense is very simple: expand your terms of self-definition. Refuse to accept a random, arbitrary accident of birth as a salient marker of your identity. Refuse to accept unthought-out shibboleths handed down to you to shore up your fear of death. Refuse to be proud, unless your pride is grounded in self-motivated, self-guided achievement, and not some random, bizarre, nonsensical ‘pride’ based on the fact your mother happened to plop you out here, and not there. None of this would matter a fig, but for a key point: we now, at this critical juncture in our cosmic journey, face the very real and present danger of incinerating this planet and everything on it. Really. We are better than that. You, Gemm, are better than that. I hope.
    1
  15468. 1
  15469. 1
  15470. 1
  15471. 1
  15472. 1
  15473. 1
  15474. 1
  15475. 1
  15476. 1
  15477. 1
  15478. 1
  15479. 1
  15480. 1
  15481. 1
  15482. 1
  15483. 1
  15484. 1
  15485. 1
  15486. 1
  15487. 1
  15488. 1
  15489. 1
  15490. 1
  15491. 1
  15492. 1
  15493. 1
  15494. 1
  15495. While observing the bedlam being played out daily on our screens, I couldn’t help but be struck by how eerily similar this whole farrago is to Kubrick’s Dr Strangelove , with a slight tweaking of point-of-view, and flipping of roles, in which America is Russia and Russia is America. In Kubrick’s masterpiece, American Brigadier General Jack D Ripper (Putin), has been driven insane with paranoia by the events of the Cold War. (In Putin’s case insanity and monomaniacal post-Cold War paranoia at a loss and diminution of his beloved Russia, as was USSR.) Ripper has become convinced that there is a plot by the ‘Commies’ (USA/NATO in Putin’s case) to ‘sap and contaminate our precious bodily fluids’. (In Putin’s case to sap and contaminate the minds of the Russians, and the idea of a Greater Russian Empire.) Ripper decides to take pre-emptive, first-strike unilateral action by striking the USSR. (Putin’s pre-emptive strike on Ukraine, and by extension the West in general.) The B-52s, under Ripper’s command, go in and hydrogen bomb the USSR. (Mercifully, Putin has not yet gone this far.) The US president along with his back-room staff attempt to stop the bombers from delivering their payload. (We can only pray Putin has back-room staff strong enough and prepared to step in if he tries to fulfill his nuclear threat.) Here’s the rub, however, the only way to stop the bombers in Dr Strangelove ,is a recall code which only Ripper knows. (We must pray, even the atheists/agnostics amongst us, that with Putin, it’s not only him that has access to the button.) The US government tries to capture Ripper to get the recall code from him, but Ripper gets away. (Will we be able to stop Putin?) The really scary kicker in Kubrick’s film, however, is that the Soviets have built a doomsday machine that will launch enough missiles to destroy all life on Earth if an American nuclear bomb hits them. (I’m pretty confident Putin’s enemies - us - won’t go this far.) Eventually, Ripper is overpowered, but shoots himself before the recall code can be given. (An inside job on Putin, perhaps, before he can incinerate the planet?) One man ignores the recall code and piles headlong towards Moscow. (A member of Putin’s inner team, perhaps?) He attempts to drop the bomb (On Ukraine? On Europe? On America?) After some door-jamming black humour he opens the doors and rides down on the bomb. 💣 Moscow retaliates with horrifying consequences for the planet. (Surely the West won’t go this far.) Let’s hope that, in this case, life won’t imitate art.👀
    1
  15496. 1
  15497. 1
  15498. 1
  15499. 1
  15500. 1
  15501. 1
  15502. 1
  15503. 1
  15504. 1
  15505. 1
  15506. 1
  15507. 1
  15508. 1
  15509. 1
  15510. 1
  15511. 1
  15512. 1
  15513. 1
  15514. 1
  15515. 1
  15516. 1
  15517. 1
  15518. 1
  15519. 1
  15520. 1
  15521. 1
  15522. 1
  15523. 1
  15524. 1
  15525. 1
  15526. 1
  15527. 1
  15528. 1
  15529. 1
  15530. 1
  15531. 1
  15532. 1
  15533. 1
  15534. 1
  15535. 1
  15536. 1
  15537. 1
  15538. 1
  15539. 1
  15540. 1
  15541. 1
  15542. 1
  15543. 1
  15544. 1
  15545. 1
  15546. 1
  15547. 1
  15548. 1
  15549. 1
  15550. 1
  15551. 1
  15552. 1
  15553. 1
  15554. 1
  15555. 1
  15556. 1
  15557. 1
  15558. 1
  15559. 1
  15560. 1
  15561. 1
  15562. 1
  15563. 1
  15564. 1
  15565. 1
  15566. 1
  15567. 1
  15568. 1
  15569. 1
  15570. 1
  15571. 1
  15572. 1
  15573. 1
  15574. 1
  15575. 1
  15576. 1
  15577. 1
  15578. 1
  15579. 1
  15580. 1
  15581. 1
  15582. 1
  15583. 1
  15584. 1
  15585. 1
  15586. 1
  15587. 1
  15588. 1
  15589. 1
  15590. 1
  15591. 1
  15592. 1
  15593. 1
  15594. 1
  15595. 1
  15596. 1
  15597. 1
  15598. 1
  15599. 1
  15600. 1
  15601. 1
  15602. 1
  15603. 1
  15604. 1
  15605. 1
  15606. 1
  15607. 1
  15608. 1
  15609. 1
  15610. 1
  15611. 1
  15612. 1
  15613. 1
  15614. 1
  15615. 1
  15616. 1
  15617. 1
  15618. 1
  15619. 1
  15620. 1
  15621. 1
  15622. 1
  15623. 1
  15624. 1
  15625. 1
  15626. 1
  15627. 1
  15628. 1
  15629. 1
  15630. 1
  15631. 1
  15632. 1
  15633. 1
  15634. 1
  15635. 1
  15636. 1
  15637. 1
  15638. 1
  15639. 1
  15640. 1
  15641. 1
  15642. 1
  15643. 1
  15644. 1
  15645. 1
  15646. 1
  15647. 1
  15648. 1
  15649. 1
  15650. 1
  15651. 1
  15652. 1
  15653. 1
  15654. 1
  15655. 1
  15656. 1
  15657. 1
  15658. 1
  15659. 1
  15660. 1
  15661. 1
  15662. 1
  15663. 1
  15664. 1
  15665. 1
  15666. 1
  15667. 1
  15668. 1
  15669. 1
  15670. 1
  15671. 1
  15672. 1
  15673. 1
  15674. 1
  15675. 1
  15676. 1
  15677. 1
  15678. 1
  15679. 1
  15680. 1
  15681. 1
  15682. 1
  15683. 1
  15684. 1
  15685. 1
  15686. 1
  15687. 1
  15688. 1
  15689. 1
  15690. 1
  15691. 1
  15692. 1
  15693. 1
  15694. 1
  15695. 1
  15696. 1
  15697. 1
  15698. 1
  15699. 1
  15700. 1
  15701. 1
  15702. 1
  15703. 1
  15704. 1
  15705. 1
  15706. 1
  15707. 1
  15708. 1
  15709. 1
  15710. 1
  15711. 1
  15712. 1
  15713. 1
  15714. 1
  15715. 1
  15716. 1
  15717. 1
  15718. 1
  15719. 1
  15720. 1
  15721. 1
  15722. 1
  15723. 1
  15724. 1
  15725. 1
  15726. 1
  15727. 1
  15728. 1
  15729. 1
  15730. 1
  15731. 1
  15732. 1
  15733. 1
  15734. 1
  15735. 1
  15736. 1
  15737. 1
  15738. 1
  15739. 1
  15740. 1
  15741. 1
  15742. 1
  15743. 1
  15744. 1
  15745. 1
  15746. 1
  15747. 1
  15748. 1
  15749. 1
  15750. 1
  15751. 1
  15752. 1
  15753. 1
  15754. 1
  15755. 1
  15756. 1
  15757. 1
  15758. 1
  15759. 1
  15760. 1
  15761. 1
  15762. 1
  15763. 1
  15764. 1
  15765. 1
  15766. 1
  15767. 1
  15768. 1
  15769. 1
  15770. 1
  15771. 1
  15772. 1
  15773. 1
  15774. 1
  15775. 1
  15776. 1
  15777. 1
  15778. 1
  15779. 1
  15780. 1
  15781. 1
  15782. 1
  15783. 1
  15784. 1
  15785. 1
  15786. 1
  15787. 1
  15788. 1
  15789. 1
  15790. 1
  15791. 1
  15792. 1
  15793. 1
  15794. 1
  15795. 1
  15796. 1
  15797. 1
  15798. 1
  15799. 1
  15800. 1
  15801. 1
  15802. 1
  15803. 1
  15804. 1
  15805. 1
  15806. 1
  15807. 1
  15808. 1
  15809. 1
  15810. 1
  15811. 1
  15812. 1
  15813. 1
  15814. 1
  15815. 1
  15816. 1
  15817. 1
  15818. 1
  15819. 1
  15820. 1
  15821. 1
  15822. 1
  15823. 1
  15824. 1
  15825. 1
  15826. 1
  15827. 1
  15828. 1
  15829. 1
  15830. 1
  15831. 1
  15832. 1
  15833. 1
  15834. 1
  15835. 1
  15836. 1
  15837. 1
  15838. 1
  15839. 1
  15840. 1
  15841. 1
  15842. 1
  15843. 1
  15844. 1
  15845. 1
  15846. 1
  15847. 1
  15848. 1
  15849. 1
  15850. 1
  15851. 1
  15852. 1
  15853. 1
  15854. 1
  15855. 1
  15856. 1
  15857. 1
  15858. 1
  15859. 1
  15860. 1
  15861. 1
  15862. 1
  15863. 1
  15864. 1
  15865. 1
  15866. 1
  15867. 1
  15868. 1
  15869. 1
  15870. 1
  15871. 1
  15872. 1
  15873. 1
  15874. 1
  15875. 1
  15876. 1
  15877. 1
  15878. 1
  15879. 1
  15880. 1
  15881. 1
  15882. 1
  15883. 1
  15884. 1
  15885. 1
  15886. 1
  15887. 1
  15888. 1
  15889. 1
  15890. 1
  15891. 1
  15892. 1
  15893. 1
  15894. 1
  15895. 1
  15896. 1
  15897. 1
  15898. 1
  15899. 1
  15900. 1
  15901. 1
  15902. 1
  15903. 1
  15904. 1
  15905. 1
  15906. 1
  15907. 1
  15908. 1
  15909. 1
  15910. 1
  15911. 1
  15912. 1
  15913. 1
  15914. 1
  15915. 1
  15916. 1
  15917. 1
  15918. 1
  15919. 1
  15920. 1
  15921. 1
  15922. 1
  15923. 1
  15924. 1
  15925. 1
  15926. 1
  15927. 1
  15928. 1
  15929. 1
  15930. 1
  15931. 1
  15932. 1
  15933. 1
  15934. 1
  15935. 1
  15936. 1
  15937. 1
  15938. 1
  15939. 1
  15940. 1
  15941. 1
  15942. 1
  15943. 1
  15944. 1
  15945. 1
  15946. 1
  15947. 1
  15948. 1
  15949. 1
  15950. 1
  15951. 1
  15952. 1
  15953. 1
  15954. 1
  15955. 1
  15956. 1
  15957. 1
  15958. 1
  15959. 1
  15960. 1
  15961. 1
  15962. 1
  15963. 1
  15964. 1
  15965. 1
  15966. 1
  15967. 1
  15968. 1
  15969. 1
  15970. 1
  15971. 1
  15972. 1
  15973. 1
  15974. 1
  15975. 1
  15976. 1
  15977. 1
  15978. 1
  15979. 1
  15980. 1
  15981. 1
  15982. 1
  15983. 1
  15984. 1
  15985. 1
  15986. 1
  15987. 1
  15988. 1
  15989. 1
  15990. 1
  15991. 1
  15992. 1
  15993. 1
  15994. 1
  15995. 1
  15996. 1
  15997. 1
  15998. 1
  15999. 1
  16000. 1
  16001. 1
  16002. 1
  16003. 1
  16004. 1
  16005. 1
  16006. 1
  16007. 1
  16008. 1
  16009. 1
  16010. 1
  16011. 1
  16012. 1
  16013. 1
  16014. 1
  16015. 1
  16016. 1
  16017. 1
  16018. 1
  16019. 1
  16020. 1
  16021. 1
  16022. 1
  16023. 1
  16024. 1
  16025. 1
  16026. 1
  16027. 1
  16028. 1
  16029. 1
  16030. 1
  16031. 1
  16032. 1
  16033. 1
  16034. 1
  16035. 1
  16036. 1
  16037. 1
  16038. 1
  16039. 1
  16040. 1
  16041. 1
  16042. 1
  16043. 1
  16044. 1
  16045. 1
  16046. 1
  16047. 1
  16048. 1
  16049. 1
  16050. 1
  16051. 1
  16052. 1
  16053. 1
  16054. 1
  16055. 1
  16056. 1
  16057. 1
  16058. 1
  16059. 1
  16060. 1
  16061. 1
  16062. 1
  16063. 1
  16064. 1
  16065. 1
  16066. 1
  16067. 1
  16068. 1
  16069. 1
  16070. 1
  16071. 1
  16072. 1
  16073. 1
  16074. 1
  16075. 1
  16076. 1
  16077. 1
  16078. 1
  16079. 1
  16080. 1
  16081. 1
  16082. 1
  16083. 1
  16084. 1
  16085. 1
  16086. 1
  16087. 1
  16088. 1
  16089. 1
  16090. 1
  16091. 1
  16092. 1
  16093. 1
  16094. 1
  16095. 1
  16096. There is a direct correlation between countries which belong to the Commonwealth, and therefore have previously been under British rule, and countries that still have homophobic biphobic and/or transphobic legislature in their constitutions. 25% of the world’s population (2.4 billion people) currently live in a country belonging to the Commonwealth, however they make up a disproportionately large 50 per cent of countries that still criminalise homosexuality. There are currently 64 countries (out of 195) in the world that criminalise homosexuality. Of these 64, almost half (29) belong to the Commonwealth. Africa Algeria Cameroon ✅ Chad Comoros Egypt Eritrea Eswatini (Swaziland) ✅ Ethiopia Gambia ✅ Ghana ✅ Guinea Kenya ✅ Liberia Libya Malawi ✅ Mauritania Morocco Nigeria ✅ Senegal Sierra Leone ✅ Somalia South Sudan Sudan Tanzania Togo ✅ Tunisia Uganda ✅ Zambia ✅ Zimbabwe ✅ Asia, including the Middle East Afghanistan Bangladesh ✅ Brunei ✅ Indonesia Iran Iraq Kuwait Lebanon Malaysia ✅ Maldives ✅ Myanmar Oman Pakistan ✅ Palestine Qatar Saudi Arabia Sri Lanka ✅ Syria Turkmenistan United Arab Emirates Uzbekistan Yemen Americas Grenada ✅ Guyana ✅ Jamaica ✅ St Lucia ✅ St Vincent & the Grenadines ✅ Oceania Kiribati ✅ Niue Papua New Guinea ✅ Samoa ✅ Solomon Islands ✅ Tonga ✅ Tuvalu ✅ ✅ Commonwealth member The vast majority of the remaining 64 are majority Islamic. What does this prove? Well, organised religion plays a vital role in the criminalisation of homosexuality. However, the key takeaway for the purposes of this video, is that in Uganda, prior to the widespread introduction of Christianity (Uganda is currently 84% Christian/14% Muslim) homosexuality was largely tolerated and not legislated for within the various tribal denominations. At worst, in most cases, it was merely ignored. Yet here we have Museveni telling the ‘evil West’ to butt-out, when the criminalisation of homosexuality was brought in directly on the back of a Bible (…and a Quran!) by a bunch of Westerners! Hypocrisy? 🤦‍♂️
    1
  16097. 1
  16098. 1
  16099. 1
  16100. 1
  16101. 1
  16102. 1
  16103. 1
  16104. 1
  16105. 1
  16106. 1
  16107. 1
  16108. 1
  16109. 1
  16110. 1
  16111. 1
  16112.  @jegamespeed5399 ​​⁠Don’t be silly son. Do you honestly think girls in their right minds are going to willingly consent to having their genitals lopped off? 🤦‍♂️ “Listen, hun, after school today me and your mother are going to take you to have a completely unnecessary medical procedure involving having your clitoris hacked off thereby leading to your being unable to have sexual pleasure ever and leading to the following possible complications:” •severe pain •excessive bleeding (haemorrhage) •genital tissue swelling •fever •infections e.g., tetanus •urinary problems •wound healing problems •injury to surrounding genital tissue •shock •vaginal problems (discharge, itching, bacterial vaginosis and other infections) menstrual problems (painful menstruations, difficulty in passing menstrual blood, etc.) •scar tissue and keloid; •sexual problems (pain during intercourse, decreased satisfaction) •increased risk of childbirth complications (difficult delivery, excessive bleeding, caesarean section, need to resuscitate the baby, etc.) and newborn deaths •need for later surgeries: for example, the sealing or narrowing of the vaginal opening (type 3) may lead to the practice of cutting open the sealed vagina later to allow for sexual intercourse and childbirth (deinfibulation). Sometimes genital tissue is stitched again several times, including after childbirth, hence the woman goes through repeated opening and closing procedures, further increasing both immediate and long-term risks •psychological problems (depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, low self-esteem, etc.). •death. “Now, darling, would you like to consent to this procedure?” 🤦‍♂️
    1
  16113. 1
  16114. 1
  16115. 1
  16116. 1
  16117. 1
  16118. 1
  16119. 1
  16120. 1
  16121. 1
  16122. 1
  16123. 1
  16124. 1
  16125. 1
  16126. 1
  16127. 1
  16128. 1
  16129. 1
  16130. 1
  16131. 1
  16132. 1
  16133. 1
  16134. 1
  16135. 1
  16136. 1
  16137. 1
  16138. 1
  16139. 1
  16140. 1
  16141. 1
  16142. 1
  16143. 1
  16144. 1
  16145. 1
  16146. 1
  16147. 1
  16148. 1
  16149. The Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Act (2023) prescribes up to 20 years in prison for ‘promotion of homosexuality’, life imprisonment for ‘homosexual acts’, and the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’. 1. How, exactly, can you ‘promote’ homosexuality? This isn’t about trying to persuade people to become gay, as if you are trying to persuade people to vote for you, or persuade people to buy a new whizz-bang, fancy-pants vibrator (ijumpjudy has just put in her order - extra batteries included 😉); that’s impossible. It’s not like you can ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. So, primitively prescribing 20 years imprisonment for something you either are or aren’t no matter how much ‘promoting’ is done is bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ 2. There are no such things as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’. If this term refers to anal/oral sex, then, spoiler alert: millions of heterosexuals engage in these acts, too, so to describe them as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’ is stupid and renders the description invalid. Even if we accept that giving/receiving a BJ or having anal sex is a ‘homosexual act’, you’re really going to imprison someone for life for this? 🤦‍♂️ 3. ‘Aggravated homosexuality’ has the death penalty as its punishment and is described as an offence including ‘serial offenders, same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality.’ Ok, let’s break this down: •‘serial offenders’ - presumably this means people who just have consenting sex on many occasions. Death? Don’t be silly. 🤦‍♂️ •‘same-sex rape’ - as with heterosexual rape, this should obviously be criminalised, but I wouldn’t support death for it. •‘sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation’ - in the case of a position of authority, if the other person consents to the sex, I see no issue with it. If intimidation is involved and no consent given, then this should be criminalised. •‘sex with persons older than 75’ - lol. I see absolutely no reason to criminalise someone for having sex with anyone who is above the age of consent. If that person is 75, 85 or 105, and they consent to the sex, then to institute the death penalty for this is quite nonsensical. 🤦‍♂️ •‘sex with the disabled and mentally ill’ - lol. If a disabled gay man or woman wants to have sex, where’s the fucking issue? 🤷‍♂️ Death for this? Yer having a fucking larff, aincha? 🤦‍♂️ Obviously, the mentally ill could be compromised when it comes to consent, so this needs sensitivity. •‘homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality’ - so, if someone has been convicted just once for, say, giving a BJ (which isn’t actually a ‘homosexual act’, as we’ve established there is no such thing) to his partner, and he’s caught doing it again, you kill him? Really? 🤦‍♂️ When you look closely at the Bill, it becomes increasingly ridiculous and barely believable that in 2024 we are criminalising people for simply having consensual adult sex. 🤦‍♂️
    1
  16150. 1
  16151. 1
  16152. 1
  16153. 1
  16154. 1
  16155. 1
  16156. 1
  16157. 1
  16158. 1
  16159. 1
  16160. 1
  16161. 1
  16162. 1
  16163. 1
  16164. 1
  16165. 1
  16166. 1
  16167. 1
  16168. 1
  16169. 1
  16170. 1
  16171. 1
  16172. 1
  16173. 1
  16174. 1
  16175. 1
  16176. 1
  16177. 1
  16178. 1
  16179. 1
  16180. 1
  16181. 1
  16182. 1
  16183. 1
  16184. 1
  16185. 1
  16186. 1
  16187. 1
  16188. 1
  16189. 1
  16190. 1
  16191. 1
  16192. 1
  16193. 1
  16194. 1
  16195. 1
  16196. 1
  16197. 1
  16198. 1
  16199. 1
  16200. 1
  16201. 1
  16202. 1
  16203. 1
  16204. 1
  16205. 1
  16206. 1
  16207. 1
  16208. 1
  16209. 1
  16210. 1
  16211. 1
  16212. 1
  16213. 1
  16214. 1
  16215. 1
  16216. 1
  16217. 1
  16218. 1
  16219. 1
  16220. 1
  16221. 1
  16222. 1
  16223. 1
  16224. 1
  16225. 1
  16226. 1
  16227. 1
  16228. 1
  16229. 1
  16230. 1
  16231. 1
  16232. 1
  16233. 1
  16234. 1
  16235. 1
  16236. 1
  16237. 1
  16238. 1
  16239. 1
  16240. 1
  16241. 1
  16242. 1
  16243. 1
  16244. 1
  16245. 1
  16246. 1
  16247. 1
  16248. 1
  16249. 1
  16250. 1
  16251. 1
  16252. 1
  16253. 1
  16254. 1
  16255. 1
  16256. 1
  16257. 1
  16258. 1
  16259. 1
  16260. 1
  16261. 1
  16262. 1
  16263. 1
  16264. 1
  16265. 1
  16266. 1
  16267. 1
  16268. 1
  16269. 1
  16270. 1
  16271. 1
  16272. 1
  16273. 1
  16274. 1
  16275. 1
  16276. 1
  16277. 1
  16278. 1
  16279. 1
  16280. 1
  16281. 1
  16282. 1
  16283. 1
  16284. 1
  16285. 1
  16286. 1
  16287. 1
  16288. 1
  16289. 1
  16290. 1
  16291. 1
  16292. 1
  16293. 1
  16294. 1
  16295. 1
  16296. 1
  16297. 1
  16298. 1
  16299. 1
  16300. 1
  16301. 1
  16302. 1
  16303. 1
  16304. 1
  16305. 1
  16306. 1
  16307. 1
  16308. 1
  16309. 1
  16310. 1
  16311. 1
  16312. 1
  16313. 1
  16314. 1
  16315. 1
  16316. 1
  16317. 1
  16318. 1
  16319. 1
  16320. 1
  16321. 1
  16322. 1
  16323. 1
  16324. 1
  16325. 1
  16326. 1
  16327. 1
  16328. 1
  16329. 1
  16330. 1
  16331. 1
  16332. 1
  16333. 1
  16334. 1
  16335. 1
  16336. 1
  16337. 1
  16338. 1
  16339. 1
  16340. 1
  16341. 1
  16342. 1
  16343. 1
  16344. 1
  16345. 1
  16346. 1
  16347. 1
  16348. 1
  16349. 1
  16350. 1
  16351. 1
  16352. 1
  16353. 1
  16354. 1
  16355. 1
  16356. 1
  16357. 1
  16358. 1
  16359. 1
  16360. 1
  16361. 1
  16362. 1
  16363. 1
  16364. 1
  16365. 1
  16366. 1
  16367. 1
  16368. 1
  16369. 1
  16370. 1
  16371. 1
  16372. 1
  16373. 1
  16374. 1
  16375. 1
  16376. 1
  16377. 1
  16378. 1
  16379. 1
  16380. 1
  16381. 1
  16382. 1
  16383. 1
  16384. 1
  16385. 1
  16386. 1
  16387. 1
  16388. 1
  16389. 1
  16390. 1
  16391. 1
  16392. 1
  16393. 1
  16394. 1
  16395. 1
  16396. 1
  16397. 1
  16398. 1
  16399. 1
  16400. 1
  16401. 1
  16402. 1
  16403. 1
  16404. 1
  16405. 1
  16406. 1
  16407. 1
  16408. 1
  16409. 1
  16410. 1
  16411. 1
  16412. 1
  16413. 1
  16414. 1
  16415. 1
  16416. 1
  16417. 1
  16418. 1
  16419. 1
  16420. 1
  16421. 1
  16422. 1
  16423. 1
  16424. 1
  16425. 1
  16426. 1
  16427. 1
  16428. 1
  16429. 1
  16430. 1
  16431. 1
  16432. 1
  16433. 1
  16434. 1
  16435. 1
  16436. 1
  16437. 1
  16438. 1
  16439. 1
  16440. 1
  16441. 1
  16442. 1
  16443. 1
  16444. 1
  16445. 1
  16446. 1
  16447. 1
  16448. 1
  16449. 1
  16450. 1
  16451. 1
  16452. 1
  16453. 1
  16454. 1
  16455. 1
  16456. 1
  16457. 1
  16458. 1
  16459. 1
  16460. 1
  16461. 1
  16462. 1
  16463. 1
  16464. 1
  16465. 1
  16466. 1
  16467. 1
  16468. 1
  16469. 1
  16470. 1
  16471. 1
  16472. 1
  16473. 1
  16474. 1
  16475. 1
  16476. 1
  16477. 1
  16478. 1
  16479. 1
  16480. 1
  16481. 1
  16482. 1
  16483. 1
  16484. 1
  16485. 1
  16486. 1
  16487. 1
  16488. 1
  16489. 1
  16490. 1
  16491. 1
  16492. 1
  16493. 1
  16494. 1
  16495. 1
  16496. 1
  16497. 1
  16498. 1
  16499. The Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Act (2023) prescribes up to 20 years in prison for ‘promotion of homosexuality’, life imprisonment for ‘homosexual acts’, and the death penalty for ‘aggravated homosexuality’. 1. How, exactly, can you ‘promote’ homosexuality? This isn’t about trying to persuade people to become gay, as if you are trying to persuade people to vote for you, or persuade people to buy a new whizz-bang, fancy-pants vibrator (ijumpjudy has just put in her order - extra batteries included 😉); that’s impossible. It’s not like you can ‘catch’ homosexuality like you can catch a virus, any more than you can ‘catch’ heterosexuality. You are either gay or you aren’t, just as you are heterosexual, or you aren’t. So, primitively prescribing 20 years imprisonment for something you either are or aren’t no matter how much ‘promoting’ is done is bizarre, indeed. 🤦‍♂️ 2. There are no such things as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’. If this term refers to anal/oral sex, then, spoiler alert: millions of heterosexuals engage in these acts, too, so to describe them as exclusively ‘homosexual acts’ is stupid and renders the description invalid. Even if we accept that giving/receiving a BJ or having anal sex is a ‘homosexual act’, you’re really going to imprison someone for life for this? 🤦‍♂️ 3. ‘Aggravated homosexuality’ has the death penalty as its punishment and is described as an offence including ‘serial offenders, same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality.’ Ok, let’s break this down: •‘serial offenders’ - presumably this means people who just have consenting sex on many occasions. Death? Don’t be silly. 🤦‍♂️ •‘same-sex rape’ - as with heterosexual rape, this should obviously be criminalised, but I wouldn’t support death for it. •‘sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation’ - in the case of a position of authority, if the other person consents to the sex, I see no issue with it. If intimidation is involved and no consent given, then this should be criminalised. •‘sex with persons older than 75’ - lol. I see absolutely no reason to criminalise someone for having sex with anyone who is above the age of consent. If that person is 75, 85 or 105, and they consent to the sex, then to institute the death penalty for this is quite nonsensical. 🤦‍♂️ •‘sex with the disabled and mentally ill’ - lol. If a disabled gay man or woman wants to have sex, where’s the fucking issue? 🤷‍♂️ Death for this? Yer having a fucking larff, aincha? 🤦‍♂️ Obviously, the mentally ill could be compromised when it comes to consent, so this needs sensitivity. •‘homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality’ - so, if someone has been convicted just once for, say, giving a BJ (which isn’t actually a ‘homosexual act’, as we’ve established there is no such thing) to his partner, and he’s caught doing it again, you kill him? Really? 🤦‍♂️ When you look closely at the Bill, it becomes increasingly ridiculous and barely believable that in 2024 we are criminalising people for simply having consensual adult sex. 🤦‍♂️
    1
  16500. 1
  16501. 1
  16502. 1
  16503. 1
  16504. 1
  16505. 1
  16506. 1
  16507. 1
  16508. 1
  16509. 1
  16510. 1
  16511. 1
  16512. 1
  16513. 1
  16514. 1
  16515. 1
  16516. 1
  16517. 1
  16518. 1
  16519. 1
  16520. 1
  16521. 1
  16522. 1
  16523. 1
  16524. 1
  16525. 1
  16526. 1
  16527. 1
  16528. 1
  16529. 1
  16530. 1
  16531. 1
  16532. 1
  16533. 1
  16534. 1
  16535. 1
  16536. 1
  16537. 1
  16538. 1
  16539. 1
  16540. 1
  16541. 1
  16542. ⁠​​⁠​​⁠​​⁠​​⁠Why should anyone be taking lessons in anything (let alone telling consenting f*cking adults what they can and cannot do and with whom in the bedroom!🤦‍♂️) from a corrupt, tin-pot dictator presiding over a corrupt, tin-pot poverty-blasted country? There is a reason why great waves of African migrants seek a better life elsewhere. They are leaving a continent which has, historically, not pulled its weight (and continues to not pull its weight) on the world stage to go to other more enlightened, more prosperous, freer places. A good indicator of this situation is if we take a look at all the key inventions/discoveries humanity has attained, virtually none of them are out of Africa. See? Not pulling and continuing to not pull its weight. ​​⁠1. The wheel. (Sumerians) 2. Printing press. (Gutenberg - German) 3. Penicillin. (Fleming - Scottish) 4. Compass. (Chinese) 5. Light bulb. (Edison - American) 6. Telephone. (Graham Bell - Scottish) 7. Television. (Logie Baird - Scottish) 8. Internal combustion engine. (Étienne Lenoir - French) 9. The pill. (Pincus/Rock - American) 10. Internet. (Berners-Lee - English) 11. Concrete. (Nabataeans) 12. Telescope. (Lippershey - Dutch) 13. Batteries. (Volta - Italian) 14. Aeroplane. (Wright brothers - American) 15. Fridge. (Wolf - American) 16. Nuclear energy. (Fermi - Italian) 17. Vaccines. (Jenner - English) 18. X-rays. (Röntgen - German) 19. Cars. (Benz - German) 20. Radio. (Marconi - Italian) 21. Anaesthetics. (Morton - American) 22. Genetics. (Mendel - Austrian) 23. Computer. (Babbage - English) 24. Paper. (Ts'ai Lun - Chinese) 25. Steam engine. (Watt - Scottish) 26. Electricity. (Benjamin Franklin - American) 27. Steel. (Henry Bessemer - English) 28. Hindu-Arabic numeral system. (India) 29. Remote communication. (Samuel Morse - American) 30. Pasteurisation. (Louis Pasteur - French) 31. The scientific method. (Francis Bacon - English) 32. Flush toilet. (John Harrington - English) 33. Sailboat. (Mesopotamia) 34. Calculus. (Issac Newton - English/Gottfried Leibniz - German) 35. Copernican theory. (Nicolaus Copernicus - Polish) 36. Gravity. (Isaac Newton - English) 37. Theory of evolution. (Charles Darwin - English) 38. Double-entry accounting. (Luca Pacioli - Italian) 39. Mirror. (Justus von Liebig - German) 40. Electric motor. (Thomas Davenport - American) 41. GPS. (Bradford Parkinson - American) 42. DNA double-helix. (Franklin/Crick/Watson - American/English) 43. Prozac. (Klaus Schmiegel - German) 44. Industrial robot. (George Devol - American) 45. LED (Nick Holonyak - American) 46. Drones. (Abraham Karem - Iraq) 47. Digital music. (James Russell - American) 48. MRI. (Raymond Damadian - American) 49. Genetic sequencing. (Fredrick Sanger - English) 50. Rubber. (Charles Goodyear - American)
    1
  16543. 1
  16544. 1
  16545. 1
  16546. 1
  16547. 1
  16548. 1
  16549. 1
  16550. 1
  16551. 1
  16552. 1
  16553. 1
  16554. 1
  16555. 1
  16556. 1
  16557. 1
  16558. 1
  16559. 1
  16560. 1
  16561. 1
  16562. 1
  16563. 1
  16564. 1
  16565. 1
  16566. 1
  16567. 1
  16568. 1
  16569. 1
  16570. 1
  16571. 1
  16572. 1
  16573. 1
  16574. 1
  16575. 1
  16576. 1
  16577. 1
  16578. 1
  16579. 1
  16580. 1
  16581. 1
  16582. 1
  16583. 1
  16584. 1
  16585. 1
  16586. 1
  16587. 1
  16588. 1
  16589. 1
  16590. 1
  16591. 1
  16592. 1
  16593. 1
  16594. 1
  16595. 1
  16596. ⁠​​⁠​​⁠​​⁠​​⁠Why should anyone be taking lessons in anything from a corrupt, tin-pot dictator presiding over a corrupt, tin-pot poverty-blasted country? There is a reason why great waves of African migrants seek a better life elsewhere. They are leaving a continent which has, historically, not pulled its weight (and continues to not pull its weight) on the world stage to go to other more enlightened, more prosperous, freer places. A good indicator of this situation is if we take a look at all the key inventions/discoveries humanity has attained, virtually none of them are out of Africa. See? Not pulling and continuing to not pull its weight. ​​⁠1. The wheel. (Sumerians) 2. Printing press. (Gutenberg - German) 3. Penicillin. (Fleming - Scottish) 4. Compass. (Chinese) 5. Light bulb. (Edison - American) 6. Telephone. (Graham Bell - Scottish) 7. Television. (Logie Baird - Scottish) 8. Internal combustion engine. (Étienne Lenoir - French) 9. The pill. (Pincus/Rock - American) 10. Internet. (Berners-Lee - English) 11. Concrete. (Nabataeans) 12. Telescope. (Lippershey - Dutch) 13. Batteries. (Volta - Italian) 14. Aeroplane. (Wright brothers - American) 15. Fridge. (Wolf - American) 16. Nuclear energy. (Fermi - Italian) 17. Vaccines. (Jenner - English) 18. X-rays. (Röntgen - German) 19. Cars. (Benz - German) 20. Radio. (Marconi - Italian) 21. Anaesthetics. (Morton - American) 22. Genetics. (Mendel - Austrian) 23. Computer. (Babbage - English) 24. Paper. (Ts'ai Lun - Chinese) 25. Steam engine. (Watt - Scottish) 26. Electricity. (Benjamin Franklin - American) 27. Steel. (Henry Bessemer - English) 28. Hindu-Arabic numeral system. (India) 29. Remote communication. (Samuel Morse - American) 30. Pasteurisation. (Louis Pasteur - French) 31. The scientific method. (Francis Bacon - English) 32. Flush toilet. (John Harrington - English) 33. Sailboat. (Mesopotamia) 34. Calculus. (Issac Newton - English/Gottfried Leibniz - German) 35. Copernican theory. (Nicolaus Copernicus - Polish) 36. Gravity. (Isaac Newton - English) 37. Theory of evolution. (Charles Darwin - English) 38. Double-entry accounting. (Luca Pacioli - Italian) 39. Mirror. (Justus von Liebig - German) 40. Electric motor. (Thomas Davenport - American) 41. GPS. (Bradford Parkinson - American) 42. DNA double-helix. (Franklin/Crick/Watson - American/English) 43. Prozac. (Klaus Schmiegel - German) 44. Industrial robot. (George Devol - American) 45. LED (Nick Holonyak - American) 46. Drones. (Abraham Karem - Iraq) 47. Digital music. (James Russell - American) 48. MRI. (Raymond Damadian - American) 49. Genetic sequencing. (Fredrick Sanger - English) 50. Rubber. (Charles Goodyear - American)
    1
  16597. 1
  16598. 1
  16599. 1
  16600. 1
  16601. 1
  16602. 1
  16603. 1
  16604. 1
  16605. 1
  16606. 1
  16607. 1
  16608. 1
  16609. 1
  16610. 1
  16611. 1
  16612. 1
  16613. 1
  16614. 1
  16615. 1
  16616. 1
  16617. 1
  16618. 1
  16619. 1
  16620. 1
  16621. 1
  16622. 1
  16623. 1
  16624. 1
  16625. 1
  16626. 1
  16627. 1
  16628. 1
  16629. 1
  16630. 1
  16631. 1
  16632. 1
  16633. 1
  16634. 1
  16635. 1
  16636. 1
  16637. 1
  16638. 1
  16639. 1
  16640. 1
  16641. 1
  16642. 1
  16643. 1
  16644. 1
  16645. 1
  16646. 1
  16647. 1
  16648. 1
  16649. 1
  16650. 1
  16651. 1
  16652. 1
  16653. 1
  16654. 1
  16655. 1
  16656. 1
  16657. 1
  16658. 1
  16659. 1
  16660. 1
  16661. 1
  16662. 1
  16663. 1
  16664. 1
  16665. 1
  16666. 1
  16667. 1
  16668. 1
  16669. 1
  16670. 1
  16671. 1
  16672. 1
  16673. 1
  16674. 1
  16675. 1
  16676. 1
  16677. 1
  16678. 1
  16679. 1
  16680. 1
  16681. 1
  16682. 1
  16683. 1
  16684. 1
  16685. 1
  16686. 1
  16687. 1
  16688. 1
  16689. 1
  16690. 1
  16691. 1
  16692. 1
  16693. 1
  16694. 1
  16695. 1
  16696. 1
  16697. 1
  16698. 1
  16699. 1
  16700. 1
  16701. 1
  16702. 1
  16703. 1
  16704. 1
  16705. 1
  16706. 1
  16707. 1
  16708. 1
  16709. 1
  16710. 1
  16711. 1
  16712. 1
  16713. 1
  16714. 1
  16715. 1
  16716. 1
  16717. 1
  16718. 1
  16719. 1
  16720. 1
  16721. 1
  16722. 1
  16723. 1
  16724. 1
  16725. 1
  16726. 1
  16727. 1
  16728. 1
  16729. 1
  16730. 1
  16731. 1
  16732. 1
  16733. 1
  16734. 1
  16735. 1
  16736. 1
  16737. 1
  16738. 1
  16739. 1
  16740. 1
  16741. 1
  16742. 1
  16743. 1
  16744. 1
  16745. 1
  16746. 1
  16747. 1
  16748. 1
  16749. 1
  16750. 1
  16751. 1
  16752. 1
  16753. 1
  16754. 1
  16755. 1
  16756. 1
  16757. 1
  16758. 1
  16759. 1
  16760. 1
  16761. 1
  16762. 1
  16763. 1
  16764. 1
  16765. 1
  16766. 1
  16767. 1
  16768. 1
  16769. 1
  16770. 1
  16771. 1
  16772. 1
  16773. 1
  16774. 1
  16775. 1
  16776. 1
  16777. 1
  16778. 1
  16779. 1
  16780. 1
  16781. 1
  16782. 1
  16783. 1
  16784. 1
  16785. 1
  16786. 1
  16787. 1
  16788. 1
  16789. 1
  16790. 1
  16791. 1
  16792. 1
  16793. 1
  16794. 1
  16795. 1
  16796. 1
  16797. 1
  16798. 1
  16799. 1
  16800. 1
  16801. 1
  16802. 1
  16803. 1
  16804. 1
  16805. 1
  16806. 1
  16807. 1
  16808. 1
  16809. 1
  16810. 1
  16811. 1
  16812. 1
  16813. 1
  16814. 1
  16815. 1
  16816. 1
  16817. 1
  16818. 1
  16819. 1
  16820. 1
  16821. 1
  16822. 1
  16823. 1
  16824. 1
  16825. 1
  16826. 1
  16827. 1
  16828. 1
  16829. 1
  16830. 1
  16831. 1
  16832. 1
  16833. 1
  16834. 1
  16835. 1
  16836. 1
  16837. 1
  16838. 1
  16839. 1
  16840. 1
  16841. 1
  16842. 1
  16843. 1
  16844. 1
  16845. 1
  16846. 1
  16847. 1
  16848. 1
  16849. 1
  16850. 1
  16851. 1
  16852. 1
  16853. 1
  16854. 1
  16855. 1
  16856. 1
  16857. 1
  16858. 1
  16859. 1
  16860. 1
  16861. 1
  16862. 1
  16863. 1
  16864. 1
  16865. 1
  16866. 1
  16867. 1
  16868. 1
  16869. 1
  16870. 1
  16871. 1
  16872. 1
  16873. 1
  16874. 1
  16875. 1
  16876. 1
  16877. 1
  16878. 1
  16879. 1
  16880. 1
  16881. 1
  16882. 1
  16883. 1
  16884. 1
  16885. 1
  16886. 1
  16887. 1
  16888. 1
  16889. 1
  16890. 1
  16891. 1
  16892. 1
  16893. 1
  16894. Proof that this is just a nasty, irrational, childish “yah-boo sucks!” gesture to the ‘evil West’, aside from Museveni’s explicit call to “resist imperialist pressure”, is the widespread denial that homosexuality was practised before colonisation, and homosexuality is often considered ‘un-African’ or ‘Western’; the promotion of LGBTQ rights is often viewed as a form of neocolonialism, the imposition of outside cultural values upon Africa. Similarly to neighbouring Kenya, Rwanda and Burundi, male homosexual relations were acknowledged and tolerated in pre colonial Ugandan society. Among the Baganda, Uganda's largest ethnic group, homosexuality was usually treated with indifference. The Luganda term abasiyazi refers to homosexuals, though usage nowadays is commonly pejorative. Among the Lango people, mudoko dako individuals were believed to form a "third gender" alongside male and female. The mudoko dako were effeminate men, mostly treated by Langi society as women and could marry other men without social sanctions. Homosexuality was also acknowledged among the Teso, Bahima, Banyoro, and Karamojong peoples. Societal acceptance eroded after the arrival of the British and the creation of the Protectorate of Uganda. Laws prohibiting same-sex sexual acts were first put in place under British colonial rule. They were retained and expanded following independence. Conservative evangelical Christian missionaries have had significant influence on the passage of anti-LGBT legislation in Uganda. Conclusion: Museveni and others supporting this barbaric, primitive, benighted law (with provision for execution of consenting adults for having sex) claim it’s a reaction and resistance to ‘Western imperialists’, but yet it is those very ‘imperialists’, in the form of Conservative Christian groups (and Christianity more generally) who have been the major driving force behind this legislation. Museveni and the rest supporting this law cannot have it both ways: they cannot claim to abhor ‘Western imperialists’ and then proceed to enact a law largely driven by Western Christians. Where I come from, that’s called hypocrisy. 🤦‍♂️
    1
  16895. 1
  16896. 1
  16897. 1
  16898. 1
  16899. 1
  16900. 1
  16901. 1
  16902. 1
  16903. 1
  16904. 1
  16905. 1
  16906. 1
  16907. 1
  16908. 1
  16909. 1
  16910. 1
  16911. 1
  16912. 1
  16913. 1
  16914. 1
  16915. 1
  16916. 1
  16917. 1
  16918. 1
  16919. 1
  16920. 1
  16921. 1
  16922. 1
  16923. 1
  16924. 1
  16925. 1
  16926. 1
  16927. 1
  16928. 1
  16929. 1
  16930. 1
  16931.  @cchris874 Ignore Jegamoron. He’s bad faith. What he omitted to explain was ‘aggravated homosexuality’ has the death penalty as its punishment and is described as an offence including ‘serial offenders, same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality.’ Ok, let’s break this down: •‘serial offenders’ - presumably this means people who just have consenting sex on many occasions. Death? Don’t be silly. 🤦‍♂️ •‘same-sex rape’ - as with heterosexual rape, this should obviously be criminalised, but I wouldn’t support death for it. •‘sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation’ - in the case of a position of authority, if the other person consents to the sex, I see no issue with it. If intimidation is involved and no consent given, then this should be criminalised. •‘sex with persons older than 75’ - lol. I see absolutely no reason to criminalise someone for having sex with anyone who is above the age of consent. If that person is 75, 85 or 105, and they consent to the sex, then to institute the death penalty for this is quite nonsensical. 🤦‍♂️ •‘sex with the disabled and mentally ill’ - lol. If a disabled gay man or woman wants to have sex, where’s the fucking issue? 🤷‍♂️ Death for this? Yer having a fucking larff, aincha? 🤦‍♂️ Obviously, the mentally ill could be compromised when it comes to consent, so this needs sensitivity. •‘homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction for homosexuality’ - so, if someone has been convicted just once for, say, giving a BJ (which isn’t actually a ‘homosexual act’, as we’ve established there is no such thing) to his partner, and he’s caught doing it again, you kill him? Really? 🤦‍♂️
    1
  16932. 1
  16933. 1
  16934. 1
  16935. 1
  16936. 1
  16937. 1
  16938. 1
  16939. 1
  16940. 1
  16941. 1
  16942. 1
  16943. 1
  16944. 1
  16945. 1
  16946. 1
  16947. 1
  16948. 1
  16949. 1
  16950. 1
  16951. 1
  16952. 1
  16953. 1
  16954. 1
  16955. 1
  16956. 1
  16957. 1
  16958. 1
  16959. 1
  16960. 1
  16961. 1
  16962. 1
  16963. 1
  16964. 1
  16965. 1
  16966. 1
  16967. 1
  16968. 1
  16969. 1
  16970. 1
  16971. 1
  16972. 1
  16973. 1
  16974. 1
  16975. 1
  16976. 1
  16977. 1
  16978. 1
  16979. 1
  16980. 1
  16981. 1
  16982. 1
  16983. 1
  16984. 1
  16985. 1
  16986. 1
  16987. 1
  16988. 1
  16989. 1
  16990. 1
  16991. 1
  16992. 1
  16993. 1
  16994. 1
  16995. 1
  16996. 1
  16997. 1
  16998. 1
  16999. 1
  17000. 1
  17001. 1
  17002. 1
  17003. 1
  17004. 1
  17005. 1
  17006. 1
  17007. 1
  17008. 1
  17009. 1
  17010. 1
  17011. 1
  17012. 1
  17013. 1
  17014. 1
  17015. 1
  17016. 1
  17017. 1
  17018. 1
  17019. 1
  17020. 1
  17021. 1
  17022. 1
  17023. 1
  17024. 1
  17025. 1
  17026. 1
  17027. 1
  17028. 1
  17029. 1
  17030. 1
  17031. 1
  17032. 1
  17033. 1
  17034. 1
  17035. 1
  17036. 1
  17037. 1
  17038. 1
  17039. 1
  17040. 1
  17041. 1
  17042. 1
  17043. 1
  17044. 1
  17045. 1
  17046. 1
  17047. 1
  17048. 1
  17049. 1
  17050. 1
  17051. 1
  17052. 1
  17053. 1
  17054. 1
  17055. 1
  17056. 1
  17057. 1
  17058. 1
  17059. 1
  17060. 1
  17061. 1
  17062. 1
  17063. 1
  17064. 1
  17065. 1
  17066. 1
  17067. 1
  17068. 1
  17069. 1
  17070. 1
  17071. 1
  17072. 1
  17073. 1
  17074. 1
  17075. 1
  17076. 1
  17077. 1
  17078. 1
  17079. 1
  17080. 1
  17081. 1
  17082. 1
  17083. 1
  17084. 1
  17085. 1
  17086. 1
  17087. 1
  17088. 1
  17089. 1
  17090. 1
  17091. 1
  17092. 1
  17093. 1
  17094. 1
  17095. 1
  17096. 1
  17097. 1
  17098. 1
  17099. 1
  17100. 1
  17101. 1
  17102. 1
  17103. 1
  17104. 1
  17105. 1
  17106. 1
  17107. 1
  17108. 1
  17109. 1
  17110. 1
  17111. 1
  17112. 1
  17113. 1
  17114. 1
  17115. 1
  17116. 1
  17117. 1
  17118. 1
  17119. 1
  17120. 1
  17121. 1
  17122. 1
  17123. 1
  17124. 1
  17125. 1
  17126. 1
  17127. 1
  17128. 1
  17129. 1
  17130. 1
  17131. 1
  17132. 1
  17133. 1
  17134. 1
  17135. 1
  17136. 1
  17137. 1
  17138. 1
  17139. 1
  17140. 1
  17141. 1
  17142. 1
  17143. 1
  17144. 1
  17145. 1
  17146. 1
  17147. 1
  17148. 1
  17149. 1
  17150. 1
  17151. 1
  17152. 1
  17153. 1
  17154. 1
  17155. 1
  17156. 1
  17157. 1
  17158. 1
  17159. 1
  17160. 1
  17161. 1
  17162. 1
  17163. 1
  17164. 1
  17165. 1
  17166. 1
  17167. 1
  17168. 1
  17169. 1
  17170. 1
  17171. 1
  17172. 1
  17173. 1
  17174. 1
  17175. 1
  17176. 1
  17177. 1
  17178. 1
  17179. 1
  17180. 1
  17181. 1
  17182. 1
  17183. 1
  17184. 1
  17185. 1
  17186. 1
  17187. 1
  17188. 1
  17189. 1
  17190. 1
  17191. 1
  17192. 1
  17193. 1
  17194. 1
  17195. 1
  17196. 1
  17197. 1
  17198. 1
  17199. 1
  17200. 1
  17201. 1
  17202. 1
  17203. 1
  17204. 1
  17205. 1
  17206. 1
  17207. 1
  17208. 1
  17209. 1
  17210. 1
  17211. 1
  17212. 1
  17213. 1
  17214. 1
  17215. 1
  17216. 1
  17217. 1
  17218. 1
  17219. 1
  17220. 1
  17221. 1
  17222. 1
  17223. 1
  17224. 1
  17225. 1
  17226. 1
  17227. 1
  17228. 1
  17229.  @jegamespeed5399  “You know that most cases of FGM are consensual, right? Many people are raised in environments where this practice is normalised, so they don’t see any issue with it. They consent to it.” (Jegamespeed5399) 🤦‍♂️ Don’t be silly, son. Do you honestly think 12 year old girls in their right minds are going to willingly consent to having their genitals lopped off? FGM is essentially the female equivalent of a dude having his tackle lopped off. 🤦‍♂️ “Listen, hun, after school today me and your mother are going to take you to have a completely unnecessary medical procedure involving having your clitoris hacked off thereby leading to your being unable to have sexual pleasure ever and leading to the following possible complications:” •severe pain •excessive bleeding (haemorrhage) •genital tissue swelling •fever •infections e.g., tetanus •urinary problems •wound healing problems •injury to surrounding genital tissue •shock •vaginal problems (discharge, itching, bacterial vaginosis and other infections) menstrual problems (painful menstruations, difficulty in passing menstrual blood, etc.) •scar tissue and keloid; •sexual problems (pain during intercourse, decreased satisfaction) •increased risk of childbirth complications (difficult delivery, excessive bleeding, caesarean section, need to resuscitate the baby, etc.) and newborn deaths •need for later surgeries: for example, the sealing or narrowing of the vaginal opening (type 3) may lead to the practice of cutting open the sealed vagina later to allow for sexual intercourse and childbirth (deinfibulation). Sometimes genital tissue is stitched again several times, including after childbirth, hence the woman goes through repeated opening and closing procedures, further increasing both immediate and long-term risks •psychological problems (depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, low self-esteem, etc.) •death. “Now, darling, would you like to consent to this completely unnecessary procedure?” 🤦‍♂️
    1
  17230. 1
  17231. 1
  17232. 1
  17233. 1
  17234. 1
  17235. 1
  17236. 1
  17237. 1
  17238. 1
  17239. 1
  17240. 1
  17241. 1
  17242. 1
  17243. 1
  17244. 1
  17245. 1
  17246. 1
  17247. 1
  17248. 1
  17249. 1
  17250. 1
  17251. 1
  17252. 1
  17253. 1
  17254. 1
  17255. 1
  17256. 1
  17257. 1
  17258. 1
  17259. 1
  17260. 1
  17261. 1
  17262. 1
  17263. 1
  17264. 1
  17265. 1
  17266. 1
  17267. 1
  17268. 1
  17269. 1
  17270. 1
  17271. 1
  17272. 1
  17273. 1
  17274. 1
  17275. 1
  17276. 1
  17277. 1
  17278. 1
  17279. 1
  17280. 1
  17281. 1
  17282. 1
  17283. 1
  17284. 1
  17285. 1
  17286. 1
  17287. 1
  17288. 1
  17289. 1
  17290. 1
  17291. 1
  17292. 1
  17293. 1
  17294. 1
  17295. 1
  17296. 1
  17297. 1
  17298. 1
  17299. 1
  17300. 1
  17301. 1
  17302. 1
  17303. 1
  17304. 1
  17305. 1
  17306. 1
  17307. 1
  17308. 1
  17309. 1
  17310. 1
  17311. 1
  17312. 1
  17313. 1
  17314. 1
  17315. 1
  17316. 1
  17317. 1
  17318. 1
  17319. 1
  17320. 1
  17321. 1
  17322. 1
  17323. 1
  17324. 1
  17325. 1
  17326. 1
  17327. 1
  17328. 1
  17329. 1
  17330. 1
  17331. 1
  17332. 1
  17333. 1
  17334. 1
  17335. 1
  17336. 1
  17337. 1
  17338.  @jegamespeed5399  There are currently 64 countries (out of 195) in the world that criminalise homosexuality. What do these countries (aside from criminalizing homosexuality) have in common? Three factors - economic development (or the lack thereof), democracy (or the lack thereof) and religion - seem to be significant. All or most of these countries are some of the poorest on the planet, have very strong religious leanings (mainly Islam/Christianity) and score very poorly on democracy tables when ranked. Of the 64, 29 are in benighted Africa, 22 in Asia, 5 in the Americas and 7 in Oceania. No country in enlightened Europe has a law against homosexuality. Why would it? 🤷‍♂️ It’s just 2 consenting adults having sex after all, and, last time I checked, that’s really no one (state or individual) else’s business. Europe also has some of the wealthiest countries on Earth, relatively low levels of organised religion and high levels of democracy. Here’s the unholy list of the countries that like to unreasonably, unjustifiably meddle in the sex lives of consenting adults: Africa Algeria Cameroon Chad Comoros Egypt Eritrea Eswatini (Swaziland) Ethiopia Gambia Ghana Guinea Kenya Liberia Libya Malawi Mauritania Morocco Nigeria Senegal Sierra Leone Somalia South Sudan Sudan Tanzania Togo Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe Asia, including the Middle East Afghanistan Bangladesh Brunei Indonesia Iran Iraq Kuwait Lebanon Malaysia Maldives Myanmar Oman Pakistan Palestine Qatar Saudi Arabia Sri Lanka Syria Turkmenistan United Arab Emirates Uzbekistan Yemen Americas Grenada Guyana Jamaica St Lucia St Vincent & the Grenadines Oceania Kiribati Niue Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Tuvalu
    1
  17339. 1
  17340. 1
  17341. 1
  17342. 1
  17343. 1
  17344. 1
  17345. 1
  17346.  @something215 Well said! 👏 There are currently 64 countries (out of 195) in the world that criminalise homosexuality. What do these countries (aside from criminalizing homosexuality) have in common? Three factors - economic development (or the lack thereof), democracy (or the lack thereof) and religion - seem to be significant. All or most of these countries are some of the poorest on the planet, have very strong religious leanings (mainly Islam/Christianity) and score very poorly on democracy tables when ranked. Of the 64, 29 are in benighted Africa, 22 in Asia, 5 in the Americas and 7 in Oceania. No country in enlightened Europe has a law against homosexuality. Why would it? 🤷‍♂️ It’s just 2 consenting adults having sex after all, and, last time I checked, that’s really no one (state or individual) else’s business. Europe also has some of the wealthiest countries on Earth, relatively low levels of organised religion and high levels of democracy. Here’s the unholy list of the countries that like to unreasonably, unjustifiably meddle in the sex lives of consenting adults: Africa Algeria Cameroon Chad Comoros Egypt Eritrea Eswatini (Swaziland) Ethiopia Gambia Ghana Guinea Kenya Liberia Libya Malawi Mauritania Morocco Nigeria Senegal Sierra Leone Somalia South Sudan Sudan Tanzania Togo Tunisia Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe Asia, including the Middle East Afghanistan Bangladesh Brunei Indonesia Iran Iraq Kuwait Lebanon Malaysia Maldives Myanmar Oman Pakistan Palestine Qatar Saudi Arabia Sri Lanka Syria Turkmenistan United Arab Emirates Uzbekistan Yemen Americas Grenada Guyana Jamaica St Lucia St Vincent & the Grenadines Oceania Kiribati Niue Papua New Guinea Samoa Solomon Islands Tonga Tuvalu
    1
  17347. 1
  17348. 1
  17349. 1
  17350. 1
  17351. 1
  17352. 1
  17353. 1
  17354. 1
  17355. 1
  17356. 1
  17357. 1
  17358. 1
  17359. 1
  17360. 1
  17361. 1
  17362. 1
  17363. 1
  17364. 1
  17365. 1
  17366. 1
  17367. 1
  17368. 1
  17369. 1
  17370. 1
  17371. 1
  17372. 1
  17373. 1
  17374. 1
  17375. 1
  17376. 1
  17377. 1
  17378. 1
  17379. 1
  17380. 1
  17381. 1
  17382. 1
  17383. 1
  17384. 1
  17385. 1
  17386. 1
  17387. 1
  17388. 1
  17389. 1
  17390. 1
  17391. 1
  17392. 1
  17393. 1
  17394. 1
  17395. 1
  17396. 1
  17397. 1
  17398. 1
  17399. 1
  17400. 1
  17401. 1
  17402. 1
  17403. 1
  17404. 1
  17405. 1
  17406. 1
  17407. 1
  17408. 1
  17409. 1
  17410. 1
  17411. 1
  17412. 1
  17413. 1
  17414. 1
  17415. 1
  17416. 1
  17417. 1
  17418. 1
  17419. 1
  17420. 1
  17421. 1
  17422. 1
  17423. 1
  17424. 1
  17425. 1
  17426. 1
  17427. 1
  17428. 1
  17429. 1
  17430. 1
  17431. 1
  17432. 1
  17433. 1
  17434. 1
  17435. 1
  17436. 1
  17437. 1
  17438. 1
  17439. 1
  17440. 1
  17441. 1
  17442. 1
  17443. 1
  17444. 1
  17445. 1
  17446. 1
  17447. 1
  17448. 1
  17449. 1
  17450. 1
  17451. 1
  17452. 1
  17453. 1
  17454. 1
  17455. 1
  17456. 1
  17457. 1
  17458. 1
  17459. 1
  17460. 1
  17461. 1
  17462. 1
  17463. 1
  17464. 1
  17465. 1
  17466. 1
  17467. 1
  17468. 1
  17469. 1
  17470. 1
  17471. 1
  17472. 1
  17473. 1
  17474. 1
  17475. 1
  17476. 1
  17477. 1
  17478. 1
  17479. 1
  17480. 1
  17481. 1
  17482. 1
  17483. 1
  17484. 1
  17485. 1
  17486. 1
  17487. ❄️ ⛄️ Crazy stuff! With all these extremes from season to season, they may have to alter the State names accordingly: Squallabama 🥶 Alabalmy 😎 Alaskia 🥶 Baked Alaska 😎 Arizsnowa 🥶 Ablazeona 😎 Arkanthaw 🥶 Arkansawdust 😎 Califognia 🥶 Tropicalifornia 😎 Coolorado 🥶 Swimmingpoolorado 😎 Connecticold 🥶 Airconnecticut 😎 Delaglare 🥶 Delaflare 😎 Flurryda 🥶 Torrida 😎 Georjackfrost 🥶 Scorchia 😎 Thawaii 🥶 Hafryii 😎 Slideaho 🥶 Humidaho 😎 Chillinois 🥶 Grillinois 😎 Windiana 🥶 Indianaked 😎 Iowhiteout 🥶 Fryowa 😎 Kansice 🥶 Tansas 😎 Godforsakentucky🥶Kensunstrucky😎 Louicyana 🥶 Loubeesiana 😎 Mainedeer 🥶 Mainesteam😎 Buryland 🥶 Marysand 😎 Massachillsetts 🥶 Massastewsetts 😎 Michighandwarmers 🥶 Mitchygan 😎 Mittensota 🥶 Manitshota 😎 Missiceslippy 🥶 Missicecreamy 😎 Missfury 🥶 Blissouri 😎 Montanavalanche 🥶 Montfana 😎 Nebbbrrraska 🥶 Nebaska 😎 Nevada ~ already means Neveranda 😎 ‘snowy mountains’ 🥶 New Hampshiver 🥶 New Hampfire 😎 Blew Jersey 🥶 Phew! Jersey 😎 New Mexicool 🥶 Stew Mexico 😎 Snowshoe York 🥶 Tennisshoe York😎 North/South Barrelina 🥶North/South Casolina 😎 North/South Dacoata 🥶 North/South Dakhota 😎 Snowhio 🥶 Ohsigho 😎 Oklabomba 🥶 Sunstrokelahoma 😎 Thawregon 🥶 Oregoneoff 😎 Pennsylweathervania🥶Pennsgrillvania 😎 Rhode Iceland 🥶 Rhode Dryland 😎 Tennessleet 🥶 Tennessteamy 😎 Texice 🥶 Texass 😎 Uthaw 🥶 Blutah 😎 Shivermont 🥶 Heatwavermont 😎 Frozen Riverginia 🥶 Virginiasling 😎 Washingtoboggan 🥶 Washingsun 😎 Rawest Virginia 🥶 Sweat Virginia 😎 Wicesconsin 🥶 Wisconsun 😎 Wysnowing 🥶 Dryoming😎
    1
  17488. 1
  17489. 1
  17490. 1
  17491. 1
  17492. 1
  17493. 1
  17494. 1
  17495. 1
  17496. 1
  17497. 1
  17498. 1
  17499. 1
  17500. 1
  17501. 1
  17502. 1
  17503. 1
  17504. 1
  17505. 1
  17506. 1
  17507. 1
  17508. 1
  17509. 1
  17510. 1
  17511. 1
  17512. 1
  17513. 1
  17514. 1
  17515. 1
  17516. 1
  17517. 1
  17518. 1
  17519. 1
  17520. 1
  17521. 1
  17522. 1
  17523. 1
  17524. 1
  17525. 1
  17526. 1
  17527. 1
  17528. 1
  17529. 1
  17530. 1
  17531. 1
  17532. 1
  17533. 1
  17534. 1
  17535. 1
  17536. 1
  17537. 1
  17538. 1
  17539. 1
  17540. 1
  17541. 1
  17542. 1
  17543. 1
  17544. 1
  17545. 1
  17546. 1
  17547. 1
  17548. 1
  17549. 1
  17550. 1
  17551. 1
  17552. 1
  17553. 1
  17554. 1
  17555. 1
  17556. 1
  17557. 1
  17558. 1
  17559. 1
  17560. 1
  17561. 1
  17562. 1
  17563. 1
  17564. If I had to pick one writer who shaped my thinking more than any other it would be Emerson, along with his compadres, Whitman and Thoreau. He’s so eminently quotable and here are my Top 10 favourites of his: 1. Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood. 2. Make your own Bible. Select and collect all the words and sentences that in all your readings have been to you like the blast of a trumpet. 3. It is easy in the world to live after the world's opinion; it is easy in solitude to live after our own; but the great man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude. 4. Once you make a decision, the Universe conspires to make it happen 5. Though we travel the world over to find the beautiful, we must carry it with us, or we find it not. 6. A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. 7. You become what you think about all day long. 8. The good news is that the moment you decide that what you know is more important than what you have been taught to believe, you will have shifted gears in your quest for abundance. Success comes from within, not from without. 9. Trust thyself: every heart vibrates to that iron string. 10. There is a time in every man's education when he arrives at the conviction that envy is ignorance; that imitation is suicide; that he must take himself for better, for worse, as his portion; that though the wide universe is full of good, no kernel of nourishing corn can come to him but through his toil bestowed on that plot of ground which is given to him to till. The power which resides in him is new in nature, and none but he knows what that is which he can do, nor does he know until he has tried. Like the stars ✨ in the firmament there are countless others, but perhaps I should end with this, thereby not taking Emerson’s advice: I hate quotations. Tell me what you know.
    1
  17565. 1
  17566. 1
  17567. 1
  17568. 1
  17569. 1
  17570. 1
  17571. 1
  17572. 1
  17573. 1
  17574. @26:25 The evidence is clear: the main cause of climate change is burning fossil fuels such as oil, gas, and coal. When burnt, fossil fuels release carbon dioxide into the air, causing the planet to heat up. The climate on Earth has been changing since it formed 4.5 billion years ago. Until recently, natural factors have been the cause of these changes. Natural influences on the climate include volcanic eruptions, changes in the orbit of the Earth, and shifts in the Earth's crust (known as plate tectonics). Over the past one million years, the Earth has experienced a series of ice ages, including cooler periods (glacials) and warmer periods (interglacials). Glacial and interglacial periods cycle roughly every 100,000 years, caused by changes in Earth's orbit around the sun. For the past few thousand years, Earth has been in an interglacial period with a constant temperature. However, since the Industrial Revolution in the 1800s, the global temperature has increased at a much faster rate. By burning fossil fuels and changing how we use the land, human activity has quickly become the leading cause of changes to our climate. He’s also wrong about water vapour, too. For although water vapour probably accounts for about 60% of the Earth's greenhouse warming effect, water vapour does not control the Earth's temperature. Because these gases are not condensable at atmospheric temperatures and pressures, the atmosphere can pack in much more of these gases. Seemingly, Icke never lets the facts get in the way of a good story. For Icke, it’s a case of when the legend becomes fact, print the legend. He can just continue to spout his factually incorrect legend, and let the fact checkers be damned!😳
    1
  17575. 1
  17576. 1
  17577. 1
  17578. 1
  17579. 1
  17580. 1
  17581. 1
  17582. 1
  17583. 1
  17584. 1
  17585. 1
  17586. 1
  17587. 1
  17588. 1
  17589. 1
  17590. 1
  17591. 1
  17592. 1
  17593. 1
  17594. 1
  17595. 1
  17596. 1
  17597. 1
  17598. 1
  17599. 1
  17600. 1
  17601. 1
  17602. 1
  17603. 1
  17604. 1
  17605. 1
  17606. 1
  17607. 1
  17608. 1
  17609. 1
  17610. 1
  17611. 1
  17612. 1
  17613. 1
  17614. 1
  17615. 1
  17616. 1
  17617. 1
  17618. 1
  17619. 1
  17620. 1
  17621. 1
  17622. 1
  17623. 1
  17624. 1
  17625. 1
  17626. 1
  17627. 1
  17628. 1
  17629. 1
  17630. 1
  17631. 1
  17632. 1
  17633. 1
  17634. 1
  17635. 1
  17636. 1
  17637. 1
  17638. 1
  17639. 1
  17640. 1
  17641. 1
  17642. 1
  17643. 1
  17644. 1
  17645. 1
  17646. 1
  17647. 1
  17648. 1
  17649. 1
  17650. 1
  17651. 1
  17652. 1
  17653. 1
  17654. 1
  17655. 1
  17656. 1
  17657. 1
  17658. 1
  17659. 1
  17660. 1
  17661. 1
  17662. 1
  17663. 1
  17664. 1
  17665. 1
  17666. 1
  17667. 1
  17668. 1
  17669. 1
  17670. 1
  17671. 1
  17672. 1
  17673. 1
  17674. 1
  17675. 1
  17676. 1
  17677. 1
  17678. 1
  17679. 1
  17680. 1
  17681. 1
  17682. 1
  17683. 1
  17684. 1
  17685. 1
  17686. 1
  17687. 1
  17688. 1
  17689. 1
  17690. 1
  17691. 1
  17692. 1
  17693. 1
  17694. 1
  17695. 1
  17696. 1
  17697. 1
  17698. 1
  17699. 1
  17700. 1
  17701. 1
  17702. 1
  17703. 1
  17704. 1
  17705. 1
  17706. 1
  17707. 1
  17708. 1
  17709. 1
  17710. 1
  17711. 1
  17712.  @jandrost4664  Frankly, I can’t quite believe you are operating under the theory that the Earth is flat. I work with science in these matters and the overwhelming credible scientific evidence points to a spinning ellipsoid Earth. 1. Watch a ship sail off to sea Without being in the sky, it is impossible to see the curvature of the Earth. However, you can always see a demonstration of this if you visit a harbour or any place with a wide-open view of the water. If you are able to watch a ship sail off to sea, watch its mast and flag as it fades off into the distance. You will notice that, in fact, it does not "fade off into the distance" at all; instead, you will see its mast and flag appear to slowly sink. The ship sailed beyond the point at which you would see it. Just to be sure, bring a pair of binoculars with you so that you can see even farther off into the distance. It's as if you're watching it go over to the other side of a hill. This phenomenon can only be explained by a sphere-shaped planet. 2. Watch a lunar eclipse Solar eclipses get all the attention, but if you are able to catch a glimpse of a lunar eclipse, you can see evidence that the Earth is, indeed, round. Here's how it works: Earth passes between the moon and sun, so that the sun projects Earth’s shadow onto the Moon in the night sky. You've probably seen a partial lunar eclipse without even noticing it; if the moon looks orange, that's a sign of a lunar eclipse. If you've ever seen a total lunar eclipse, you probably noticed that the shadow did not look like this. A round shadow crossed over a round object. This does not sound like a thing that would happen if we were on a plane with all of the celestial bodies simply hovering overhead—or, perhaps more asinine, if the sun were orbiting Earth and not vice versa. 3. Climb a tree Imagine a vast plane with but one tree smack in the middle. If the earth were flat, your vision would extend exactly as far while standing at the base of the tree as it would when at the top of the tree. However, the farther you climb, the farther your line of sight will extend to the horizon. That's because parts of Earth that were concealed from view by its curvature are now revealed because your position has changed. Back to the vast plane. The naked eye can see objects that are millions of miles away in space. Theoretically, with a clear line of sight on a clear night, one would also be able to see bright lights from far-away cities. That this is not possible is further evidence of a round, not flat, Earth 4. Travel through, or even within, different time zones According to a 2008 paper in Applied Optics by David K. Lynch, the curvature of the earth becomes somewhat visible at an elevation of 35,000 feet (with a >60° field of view) and more easily visible at an elevation of 50,000 feet. So if you're on the right commercial flight, you might be able to see the curvature of the earth with your own two eyes. In the event that you're not high enough, though, you can still experience the curvature of the earth another way. For example, if you were to fly all the way around the world, you'd find that it would be nighttime in part of the world and daytime in another part. In that way, the existence of time zones itself is proof that the Earth is round. Taken another way, you wouldn't even need to travel through different time zones. Time zones are wide enough that you will see the sun rising and/or setting later in the western part of a time zone than in the eastern part. According to the Farmers' Almanac, the sun will rise and set roughly four minutes later for every 70 miles you drive from east to west. If you wanted to combine this experiment with the previous one, you could note how much more of Earth you can see when you begin your ascent into the air than you can while you are sitting on the tarmac waiting to take off. 5. Watch a sunset Pick a nice spot from which you can watch a sunset (we'll call this point A). Ideally, you'd have a clear horizon in front of you, and behind you would be some sort of elevated point that you can quickly access (a hill, a building with at least two floors, or perhaps the aforementioned tree; we'll call this point B). Watch the sunset from point A, and once the sun is out of sight, hurry on over to point B. With the added elevation provided by point B, you should be able to see the sun above the horizon. If Earth were flat, the sun would not be visible at any elevation once it had set. Because Earth is round, the sun will come back into your line of sight. If you don't have a hill, you could even try lying on your stomach to watch the sunset and then standing up to get a higher line of sight. 6. Measure shadows across the country Pick two locations that are some distance apart (at least a couple hundred miles from each other and on the same meridian). Grab two sticks or dowels (or other objects) of equal length, two tape measures, and a friend. Each of you will take one stick/dowel/object and one tape measure to your location, stick the object into the ground, and measure the shadow. (For accuracy, you should both take your measurements at the same time of day.) On a flat Earth, the shadow that is cast by each would be of the same length. However, if you and your friend compare notes, you'll find that one shadow was longer than the other. That's because, due to the curvature of Earth, the sun will hit one part of Earth at one angle and another part of Earth at a different angle even at the same time of day. This experiment has been around since about 240 B.C., when Greek mathematician Eratosthenes compared the shadows cast in both Syene—now Aswan, Egypt—and Alexandria on the summer solstice. Eratosthenes had learned of a well in Syene where once a year on the summer solstice, the sun would illuminate the entire bottom of the well and tall buildings and other objects would not cast a shadow. However, he noticed that shadows were being cast on the summer solstice in Alexandria, so he measured the angle of the shadow and found it to be an angle of about 7.2°. 7. Google "International Space Station photos" Seriously, just look at some of the amazing photos you’ll find. There appears to be quite the curvature there. Now if you’d like to provide evidence to back your flat-Earth theory and God, I’d be grateful.
    1
  17713. 1
  17714. 1
  17715. 1
  17716. 1
  17717. 1
  17718. 1
  17719. 1
  17720. 1
  17721. 1
  17722. 1
  17723. 1
  17724. 1
  17725. 1
  17726. 1
  17727. 1
  17728. 1
  17729. 1
  17730. 1
  17731. 1
  17732. 1
  17733. 1
  17734. 1
  17735. 1
  17736. 1
  17737. 1
  17738. 1
  17739. 1
  17740. 1
  17741. 1
  17742. 1
  17743. 1
  17744. 1
  17745. 1
  17746. 1
  17747. 1
  17748. 1
  17749. 1
  17750. 1
  17751. 1
  17752. 1
  17753. 1
  17754. 1
  17755. 1
  17756. 1
  17757. 1
  17758. 1
  17759. 1
  17760. 1
  17761. 1
  17762. 1
  17763. 1
  17764. 1
  17765. 1
  17766. 1
  17767. 1
  17768. 1
  17769. 1
  17770. 1
  17771. 1
  17772. 1
  17773. 1
  17774. 1
  17775. 1
  17776. 1
  17777. 1
  17778. 1
  17779. 1
  17780. Always mistrusted overtly ‘political’ comedy of any stripe. Never understood this human compulsion many seem to have to put all their political eggs into a single basket. When I assess my views on each given topic I find I am ‘liberal’ in some, ‘green’ in others, ‘conservative’ in more and ‘socialist’ in a few. The rest I haven’t made my mind up yet. Blake’s dictum I always have in mind here when it comes to these things which, for me, are under constant review: The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind. Or even better, this from Emerson, which captures perfectly the predicament of those toeing a party line, come what may: A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood. Or this from the glorious Whitman: Do I contradict myself?/Very well then I contradict myself/I am large, I contain multitudes.) To bind yourself to ideas one day, and then to be doomed to defend them come what may, is not worthy of the thinking human being.😳
    1
  17781. Always mistrusted overtly ‘political’ comedy of any stripe. Never understood this human compulsion many seem to have to put all their political eggs into a single basket. When I assess my views on each given topic I find I am ‘liberal’ in some, ‘green’ in others, ‘conservative’ in more and ‘socialist’ in a few. The rest I haven’t made my mind up yet. Blake’s dictum I always have in mind here when it comes to these things which, for me, are under constant review: The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind. Or even better, this from Emerson, which captures perfectly the predicament of those toeing a party line, come what may: A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood. Or this from the glorious Whitman: Do I contradict myself?/Very well then I contradict myself/I am large, I contain multitudes.) To bind yourself to ideas one day, and then to be doomed to defend them come what may, is not worthy of the thinking human being.😳
    1
  17782. 1
  17783. 1
  17784. 1
  17785. 1
  17786. 1
  17787. Always mistrusted overtly ‘political’ comedy of any stripe. Never understood this human compulsion many seem to have to put all their political eggs into a single basket. When I assess my views on each given topic I find I am ‘liberal’ in some, ‘green’ in others, ‘conservative’ in more and ‘socialist’ in a few. The rest I haven’t made my mind up yet. Blake’s dictum I always have in mind here when it comes to these things which, for me, are under constant review: The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind. Or even better, this from Emerson: A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood. Or this from the glorious Whitman: Do I contradict myself?/Very well then I contradict myself/I am large, I contain multitudes.) To bind yourself to ideas one day, and then to be doomed to defend them come what may, is not worthy of the thinking human being.😳
    1
  17788. 1
  17789. 1
  17790. 1
  17791. 1
  17792. 1
  17793. Always mistrusted overtly ‘political’ comedy of any stripe. Never understood this human compulsion many seem to have to put all their political eggs into a single basket. When I assess my views on each given topic I find I am ‘liberal’ in some, ‘green’ in others, ‘conservative’ in more and ‘socialist’ in a few. The rest I haven’t made my mind up yet. Blake’s dictum I always have in mind here when it comes to these things which, for me, are under constant review: The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind. Or even better, this from Emerson, which captures perfectly the predicament of those toeing a party line, come what may: A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood. Or this from the glorious Whitman: Do I contradict myself?/Very well then I contradict myself/I am large, I contain multitudes.) To bind yourself to ideas one day, and then to be doomed to defend them come what may, is not worthy of the thinking human being.😳
    1
  17794. 1
  17795. 1
  17796. 1
  17797. 1
  17798. 1
  17799. 1
  17800. 1
  17801. 1
  17802. 1
  17803. 1
  17804. 1
  17805. 1
  17806. 1
  17807. 1
  17808. 1
  17809. 1
  17810. 1
  17811. 1
  17812. 1
  17813. 1
  17814. 1
  17815. 1
  17816. 1
  17817. 1
  17818. 1
  17819. 1
  17820. 1
  17821. 1
  17822. 1
  17823. 1
  17824. 1
  17825. 1
  17826. 1
  17827. 1
  17828. 1
  17829. 1
  17830. 1
  17831. 1
  17832. 1
  17833. 1
  17834. 1
  17835. 1
  17836. 1
  17837. 1
  17838. 1
  17839. 1
  17840. 1
  17841. 1
  17842. 1
  17843. 1
  17844. 1
  17845. 1
  17846. 1
  17847. 1
  17848. 1
  17849. 1
  17850. 1
  17851. 1
  17852. 1
  17853. 1
  17854. 1
  17855. 1
  17856. 1
  17857. 1
  17858. 1
  17859. 1
  17860. 1
  17861. 1
  17862. 1
  17863. 1
  17864. 1
  17865. 1
  17866. 1
  17867. 1
  17868. 1
  17869. 1
  17870. 1
  17871. 1
  17872. 1
  17873. 1
  17874. 1
  17875. 1
  17876. 1
  17877. 1
  17878. 1
  17879. 1
  17880. 1
  17881. 1
  17882. 1
  17883. 1
  17884. 1
  17885. 1
  17886. 1
  17887. 1
  17888. 1
  17889. 1
  17890. 1
  17891. 1
  17892. 1
  17893. 1
  17894. 1
  17895. 1
  17896. 1
  17897. 1
  17898. 1
  17899. 1
  17900. 1
  17901. 1
  17902. 1
  17903. 1
  17904. 1
  17905. 1
  17906. 1
  17907. 1
  17908. 1
  17909. 1
  17910. 1
  17911. 1
  17912. 1
  17913. 1
  17914. 1
  17915. 1
  17916. 1
  17917. 1
  17918. 1
  17919. 1
  17920. 1
  17921. 1
  17922. 1
  17923. 1
  17924. 1
  17925. 1
  17926. 1
  17927. 1
  17928. 1
  17929. 1
  17930. 1
  17931. 1
  17932. 1
  17933. 1
  17934. 1
  17935. 1
  17936. 1
  17937. 1
  17938. 1
  17939.  @eeboyaker  I’m still not sure what you’re getting at. What is NATO’s endgame? You need to spell this out. Yes, but the majority of Ukrainians look West. Some 69% of Ukrainians want to join NATO, according to a June 2017 poll by the Democratic Initiatives Foundation, compared to 28% support in 2012 when Yanukovych was in power. Have you not considered this? We don’t even apply sanctions? You seem to be suggesting we just turn a blind eye and let Putin massacre a nation in plain sight. And then turn his attention elsewhere. The Baltic states? Poland? 👀 I’d like to politely ask you something else: do you have any personal stake in this? Of course, you can refuse to answer this, but you appear very anti-NATO, and if not exactly pro-Putin, you at least are happy fellow human beings look on and watch fellow human beings be annihilated. 🧐As I say, I don’t defend the west’s record of meddling in the affairs of democratically elected regimes, but on a human level I want to help stop Putin from his sanguinary murdering.👀 Leaving the geopolitics out of this, for me, the basic fact pertains: if a self-determining majority want something, and Ukrainians on a majority appear to want to look west, then that’s the bottom line, for me. Regardless of the overthrow in 2012, which I’m not defending, one needs to adhere to the democratic will of the people here. Don’t you agree?🧐 Ukrainian comedian Volodymyr Zelensky has scored a landslide victory in the country's presidential election. With nearly all ballots counted in the run-off vote, Mr Zelensky had taken more than 73% with incumbent Petro Poroshenko trailing far behind on 24%. I thought you said he was installed by the west?🧐Even more confused.
    1
  17940. 1
  17941. 1
  17942. 1
  17943. 1
  17944. 1
  17945. 1
  17946. 1
  17947. 1
  17948. 1
  17949. 1
  17950. 1
  17951. 1
  17952. 1
  17953. 1
  17954. 1
  17955. 1
  17956. 1
  17957. 1
  17958. 1
  17959. 1
  17960. 1
  17961. Yeah, but really ? The ‘enemy’? A fellow human being? The enemy? On what basis? An accident of birth? Well, how silly, for the last time I looked we were all born on the same 3rd rock from the sun. A different God? Really? Last time I checked all Gods were just inventions of human beings afraid to die. Understandable, but inexcusable if you are going to use this figment of your imagination as a pretext to exterminate another human being. Here’s how I see it: we are far too primitive as a species. After 300,000 odd years of evolution we are still looking at another person and seeing them as so different we are willing to destroy them. I call that primitive. I call that not worthy of the thinking human being. I call that behaving as a child in the playground might behave (an insult to children in the playground). We are better than this. We have the potential to be so much better. We are betraying a primitive, unthinking way of being that is just not going to be conducive to our medium to long-term survival as a species. We seem to have a death wish. It doesn’t have to be like this. How? Quite simply, you expand your terms of self-definition. So, instead of a random, arbitrary accident of birth you are, first and foremost, a human. So, instead of believing in an unverified, unverifiable sky God you are, first and foremost, a human. You are bigger than you think. Boundaries and borders based on arbitrary accidents of birth are boring. They are also deadly. If we are to get out of here alive (and this is very much in the balance, given the power we have harnessed to mutually self-destruct), then each and every one of us has to do something that is not that difficult: be a human being. 🧐
    1
  17962. 1
  17963. 1
  17964. 1
  17965. 1
  17966. 1
  17967. 1
  17968. 1
  17969. 1
  17970. 1
  17971. 1
  17972. 1
  17973. 1
  17974. 1
  17975. 1
  17976. 1
  17977. 1
  17978. 1
  17979. 1
  17980. 1
  17981. 1
  17982. 1
  17983. 1
  17984. 1
  17985. 1
  17986. 1
  17987. 1
  17988. 1
  17989. 1
  17990. 1
  17991. 1
  17992. If I had to pick one writer who shaped my thinking more than any other it would be Emerson, along with his compadres, Whitman and Thoreau. He’s so eminently quotable and here are my Top 10 favourites of his: 1. Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood. 2. Make your own Bible. Select and collect all the words and sentences that in all your readings have been to you like the blast of a trumpet. 3. It is easy in the world to live after the world's opinion; it is easy in solitude to live after our own; but the great man is he who in the midst of the crowd keeps with perfect sweetness the independence of solitude. 4. Once you make a decision, the Universe conspires to make it happen 5. Though we travel the world over to find the beautiful, we must carry it with us, or we find it not. 6. A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. 7. You become what you think about all day long. 8. The good news is that the moment you decide that what you know is more important than what you have been taught to believe, you will have shifted gears in your quest for abundance. Success comes from within, not from without. 9. Trust thyself: every heart vibrates to that iron string. 10. There is a time in every man's education when he arrives at the conviction that envy is ignorance; that imitation is suicide; that he must take himself for better, for worse, as his portion; that though the wide universe is full of good, no kernel of nourishing corn can come to him but through his toil bestowed on that plot of ground which is given to him to till. The power which resides in him is new in nature, and none but he knows what that is which he can do, nor does he know until he has tried. Like the stars ✨ in the firmament there are countless others, but perhaps I should end with this, thereby not taking Emerson’s advice: I hate quotations. Tell me what you know.
    1
  17993. Jordan Peterson’s 12 rules for life - an appraisal. Stand up straight with your shoulders straight. Unless you’re a peeping Tom and need to keep below that wall, otherwise that gorgeous, undressing next-door neighbour may spot you. Treat yourself like someone you are responsible for helping. In other words, pick up your own smelly socks, don’t litter, and make your own fucking bed! Befriend people who want the best for you. Well, this rests on your judgement of others’ character. If that’s shit, you’re fucked. Compare yourself to who you were yesterday, not the useless person you are today. This one totally contradicts the whole idea of self-improvement, for if I’m more useless today than I was yesterday, why am I even trying to self-improve?! Do not let your children do anything that makes you dislike them. Well, this assumes that you’re such an insane parental control freak with such a fascistic sense of keeping another in order that it’s not even worth considering, if only to save your own soul. Besides, kids need to make their own mistakes, so tough-titty if the parents can’t take this. Set your house in order before criticising the world. Well, if you’re a saint, perhaps. If you’re a messy flesh and blood human being then criticising the world is what gets most of us through the day, if the drugs aren’t working. Pursue what is meaningful, not what is expedient. Yeah, but that makes the enormous, unfounded assumption that any of this means anything whatsoever. Tell the truth, or at least don’t lie. I’m sorry, but that time my mother caught my porn stash under the bed, I had to lie and pin it on my twin brother, Tommy. Sometimes, lying just is the best policy and those who say otherwise are just liars. Assume the person you are listening to knows something you don’t. Ok. But this one falls down when it comes to my bank PIN number. Be precise in your speech. What ‘precise’ in one’s speech like Mr Jordan ‘why use 1 word when 21 will do?’ Peterson? Give me the conciseness of a Sam Harris any day. I’m sure Adam Sandler will concur. Do not bother children while they are skateboarding. Unless, that is, they are skateboarding all over your prize flowerbeds; then you can not only ‘bother’ them, but collar them and let them feel your hot garlicky breath on their cheeks. Pet a cat when you encounter one in the street. Unless, that is, the cat is frothing alarmingly at the mouth. Now where’s my publishing deal?😳
    1
  17994. 1
  17995. 1
  17996. 1
  17997. 1
  17998. 1
  17999. 1
  18000. 1
  18001. 1
  18002. 1
  18003. 1
  18004. 1
  18005. 1
  18006. 1
  18007. 1
  18008. 1
  18009. 1
  18010. 1
  18011. 1
  18012. 1
  18013. 1
  18014. 1
  18015. 1
  18016. 1
  18017. 1
  18018. 1
  18019. 1
  18020. 1
  18021. 1
  18022. 1
  18023. 1
  18024. 1
  18025. 1
  18026. 1
  18027. 1
  18028. 1
  18029. 1
  18030. 1
  18031. 1
  18032. 1
  18033. 1
  18034. 1
  18035. 1
  18036. 1
  18037. 1
  18038. 1
  18039. 1
  18040. 1
  18041. 1
  18042. 1
  18043. 1
  18044. 1
  18045. 1
  18046. 1
  18047. 1
  18048. 1
  18049. 1
  18050. 1
  18051. 1
  18052. 1
  18053. 1
  18054. 1
  18055. 1
  18056. 1
  18057. 1
  18058. 1
  18059. 1
  18060. 1
  18061. 1
  18062. 1
  18063. 1
  18064. 1
  18065. 1
  18066. 1
  18067. 1
  18068. 1
  18069. 1
  18070. 1
  18071. 1
  18072. 1
  18073. 1
  18074. 1
  18075. 1
  18076. 1
  18077. 1
  18078. 1
  18079. 1
  18080. 1
  18081. 1
  18082. 1
  18083. 1
  18084.  @MsMounen  Of course I have connections. I have a close family and extended family and friends. I don’t feel this need to ‘belong’ as you seem to, and particularly to belong to the random people surrounding me in the part of the world I was born and raised. Why on Earth are you going to limit yourself to a sense of ‘belonging’ and ‘connection’ to the tiny bit of the world you were randomly born into? Huh? Surely it’s better to expand your sense of who you are to encompass as many fellow human beings as possible? No? Some of my family have lived for generations in the same place, while others have moved around, lived in other countries, learned other languages, as have I, and we have thereby refused to be tied to this or that small patch we happened to have been randomly, arbitrarily born on. You seem to be suggesting that we can only feel ‘belonging’ and ‘connection’ with those who happen to come from where we happened to originate from. How sad. How bizarre. How dangerous. I feel no need to limit my connections to those who happen to share my language or happen to originate from my small spot on this Earth. I speak 4 languages based on my life experience and travels on this fascinating planet. Can’t you see that the reason for much of humanity’s troubles issues from limiting ourselves to those we happen to have been born among? Can’t you see that the trouble starts when we start identifying with this or that person to the exclusion of someone else? Have you not looked at our history recently? Currently, in Russia and Ukraine we have human beings about to annihilate each other on an industrial scale, and for what? Why? I would suggest that Ukrainians and Russians have far more in common than they don’t. The only, I repeat, the only reason that they are about to mutually massacre one another is quite simple: they have been brainwashed into believing they have more differences than similarities. They have been taught to hate such that they are prepared to murder one another without scruple. Does a Russian child hate a Ukrainian child? Of course not. Why? They haven’t been indoctrinated into the delusions of adults that say we have more differences than similarities compared to the next person. I find it patronising and insulting and laughable that you suggest I cannot have a sense of belonging just because I see nationalism/patriotism as irrational, pointless, but more importantly, very very dangerous. I belong to the Earth. And the sun. And the stars. I identify with every single human being ever born and refuse to abase myself to a petty accident of birth. You need to think about this. As to ‘spiritual beliefs’, well, I’m not a fan of organised religion, as I see it, along with nationalism/patriotism, as the greatest disaster our species ever invented. Yet, this notwithstanding, I am spiritual in my own way. The difference with me, and it’s the vital difference, is that I am not prepared to kill another for my ideas. I’m not prepared to harm a fellow human being on the basis of invented, abstract nothings, as I see them. ‘Creeds and schools in abeyance’ is the only creed I live by, along with a self-definition as large as I can encompass. 😉
    1
  18085. 1
  18086. 1
  18087. 1
  18088. 1
  18089. 1
  18090. 1
  18091. 1
  18092. 1
  18093. 1
  18094. 1
  18095. 1
  18096. 1
  18097. 1
  18098. 1
  18099. 1
  18100. 1
  18101. 1
  18102. 1
  18103. 1
  18104. 1
  18105. 1
  18106. 1
  18107. 1
  18108. 1
  18109. 1
  18110. 1
  18111. 1
  18112. 1
  18113. 1
  18114. 1
  18115. 1
  18116. 1
  18117. 1
  18118. 1
  18119. 1
  18120. 1
  18121. 1
  18122. 1
  18123. 1
  18124. 1
  18125. 1
  18126. 1
  18127. 1
  18128. 1
  18129. 1
  18130. Always mistrusted overtly ‘political’ comedy of any stripe. Never understood this human compulsion many seem to have to put all their political eggs into a single basket. When I assess my views on each given topic I find I am ‘liberal’ in some, ‘green’ in others, ‘conservative’ in more and ‘socialist’ in a few. The rest I haven’t made my mind up yet. Blake’s dictum I always have in mind here when it comes to these things which, for me, are under constant review: The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind. Or even better, this from Emerson: A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood. Or this from the glorious Whitman: Do I contradict myself?/Very well then I contradict myself/I am large, I contain multitudes.) To bind yourself to ideas one day, and then to be doomed to defend them come what may, is not worthy of the thinking human being.😳
    1
  18131. 1
  18132. 1
  18133. 1
  18134. 1
  18135. 1
  18136. 1
  18137. 1
  18138. 1
  18139. 1
  18140. 1
  18141. 1
  18142. 1
  18143. 1
  18144. 1
  18145. 1
  18146. 1
  18147. 1
  18148. 1
  18149. 1
  18150. 1
  18151. 1
  18152. 1
  18153. 1
  18154. 1
  18155. 1
  18156. 1
  18157. 1
  18158. 1
  18159. 1
  18160. 1
  18161. 1
  18162. 1
  18163. 1
  18164. 1
  18165. 1
  18166. 1
  18167. 1
  18168. 1
  18169. 1
  18170. 1
  18171. 1
  18172. 1
  18173. 1
  18174. 1
  18175. 1
  18176. 1
  18177. 1
  18178. 1
  18179. 1
  18180. 1
  18181. 1
  18182. 1
  18183. 1
  18184. 1
  18185. 1
  18186. 1
  18187. 1
  18188. 1
  18189. 1
  18190. 1
  18191. 1
  18192. 1
  18193. 1
  18194. 1
  18195. 1
  18196. 1
  18197. 1
  18198. 1
  18199. 1
  18200. 1
  18201. 1
  18202. 1
  18203. 1
  18204. 1
  18205. 1
  18206. 1
  18207. 1
  18208. 1
  18209. 1
  18210. 1
  18211. 1
  18212. 1
  18213. 1
  18214. 1
  18215. 1
  18216. 1
  18217. 1
  18218. 1
  18219. 1
  18220. 1
  18221. 1
  18222. 1
  18223. 1
  18224. 1
  18225. 1
  18226. 1
  18227. 1
  18228. 1
  18229. 1
  18230. 1
  18231. 1
  18232. 1
  18233. 1
  18234. 1
  18235. 1
  18236. 1
  18237. 1
  18238. 1
  18239. 1
  18240. 1
  18241. 1
  18242. 1
  18243. 1
  18244. 1
  18245. 1
  18246. 1
  18247. 1
  18248. 1
  18249. 1
  18250. 1
  18251. 1
  18252. 1
  18253. 1
  18254. 1
  18255. Jordan Peterson‘s 12 more (God help us all!) rules for life - an appraisal. Do not carelessly denigrate social institutions or creative achievement. Oh man. Come on! If I can’t slag off the mother-in-law you’ve thereby instantly removed 5% of my reason for getting up in the morning. Similarly, if I see a post-post-modern, abstract-expressionist post-impressionist painting in a gallery I reserve the right to draw a cock and balls over it. I want my artists figurative. Or at the very least, Italian. Imagine who you could be and then aim single-mindedly at that. Hmm … I’m imagining I could be Jordan Peterson. Oh, wait. The world isn’t big enough to contain TWO identical egos that large! Do not hide unwanted things in the fog. Especially if John Carpenter is lurking somewhere in that fog. Notice that opportunity lurks where responsibility has been abdicated. Ok, I think that makes sense. Are you saying that if I refuse to wash the dishes and decline to put the garbage out I’m on a blow-job promise that self same evening? Sounds good to me! Do not do what you hate. Yay! Jordan Peterson himself is telling me I don’t have to read a single thing he ever writes ever again! Thanks Jordy. 🙏 Abandon ideology. What, abandon the ‘ideology’ of condensing the incredible complexity of human life and existence into 12 cookie-cutter platitudes I once read in a bunch of fortune cookies? That ideology? Work as hard as you possibly can on at least one thing and see what happens. Well, since the age of about 13 I’ve been actively fulfilling this injunction and it’s nearly fallen off.😳 Try to make one room in your home as beautiful as possible. Can we agree on a corner of one room? A whole room just sounds extravagant and, frankly, a waste of my time when I’ve got rule 7 to be getting on with.😳 If old memories still upset you, write them down carefully and completely. Yes, they do. However, not sure writing them down will help. Can I not just do the more obvious, sensible thing and, er, like, well, forget them? Plan and work diligently to maintain the romance in your relationship. Yes, I buy my dick flowers at least every other Friday. Do not allow yourself to become resentful, deceitful, or arrogant. Ha! Ya got me. While I resent no one but the milk-man who ran away with the wife back in 1987 (I’m still working through it), and I have deceived no one since that time I pretended I was Jesus at a convention of atheist/agnostics, the ‘arrogant’ one still niggles. Yes, I have to admit that when in an almighty pickle, I do sometimes think: ‘What would Donald Lamont do?’ Sorry. Be grateful in spite of your suffering. Well, one of my avatars kinda said this about 2,600 years before Saint Jordan palmed it off as one of his own. But hey! plagiarism never hurt anybody when you’re trying to fool most of the people most of the time!😁 Note: Jordan Peterson will publish 12 more rules for life when he’s spent all the money he got from gullible fools buying the first 24. 🤔
    1
  18256. 1
  18257. 1
  18258. 1
  18259. 1
  18260. 1
  18261. 1
  18262. 1
  18263. 1
  18264. 1
  18265. 1
  18266. 1
  18267. 1
  18268. 1
  18269. 1
  18270. 1
  18271. 1
  18272. 1
  18273. 1
  18274. 1
  18275. 1
  18276. 1
  18277. 1
  18278. 1
  18279. 1
  18280. 1
  18281. 1
  18282. Incidentally, if Jim Holt is Jim Holt, the science writer, and for the purposes of this I shall assume he is (for the love of science, say it’s not him!), then to assert: The E.T.s (many different races, with different agendas) have already been here for a long time, millions and millions of them have even been born among humans , without doing his due scientific diligence and supplying the corroborating evidence which can be openly assessed and openly peer-reviewed, then he is doing the whole scientific enterprise a disservice. Now, there are 200 billion trillion stars out there. Is there extraterrestrial life out there? On balance of probabilities, almost certainly. Is that extraterrestrial life here? Not a shred of evidence. Assertions, like a child in the playground screaming, ‘But my daddy is better than your daddy!’, will not do. It’s my contention that a huge part of the alien visitation theory, is simply lost, lonely human beings who ditched their God in the 19th century because they knew they had to if they were being intellectually honest with themselves, and they took one look into the colossal abyss of space/time and blinked and they have filled the gaping vacuum with all manner of supernatural paraphernalia. The wild assertions actually betray doubt as to what is being asserted, for as Pirsig noted: You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in. No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise tomorrow. They know it's going to rise tomorrow. When people are fanatically dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kinds of dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or goals are in doubt. Shouting from a rooftop: ‘They’re here! The aliens are here!’ doesn’t cut it in a world where some people’s critical faculties haven’t (yet) atrophied. Hamlet may have rebuked Horatio’s incredulity in strange things unseen, and I’m sure there are more things in heaven and earth than in anyone’s philosophy, but from Aristotle to Galileo to right now, the whole scientific edifice has been built upon that initial Horatian presupposition of doubt.
    1
  18283. 1
  18284. 1
  18285.  @tammysmart4486  Well, Tammy, my opinion clearly means something to you, sweetie, as you’re trolling me and displaying an overheated hypocrisy you might wanna sort out before you accuse others. I don’t care if you are Jesus, or the ghost of Galileo, or the resurrection of Norman Bates returned to torment me as I partake of a shower, but if you claim stuff, any stuff, but particularly outlandish stuff, you need the corroborating outlandish evidence to support said stuff. If you cannot see this basic, incontrovertible fact of elementary science then I suggest your parents have been remiss in their choice of school for you. Either that, or you weren’t concentrating the day they were teaching this elementary, yes elementary, knowledge. Just for the record, I’m not a scientist. All I am is a reasonable citizen asking perfectly reasonable questions when folks like you come at me with patently unreasonable information that no one, to date, has been able to objectively corroborate. If you’re another of these ‘asserters without evidence’ people, then it’s incumbent on you to remain silent here once you have postulated your initial idea and/or experience. Yes, you may have ‘seen’ wacky lights fizzing about the sky, you may have ‘observed’ a big f*ck-off mothership at 10 paces, you may even have peered into the eyeballs of an alien, up close and personal, before they probed your nether regions, but none of this is admissible in an open forum if it’s presented without more than just your word for it.
    1
  18286. 1
  18287. 1
  18288. 1
  18289. 1
  18290. 1
  18291. 1
  18292. 1
  18293. 1
  18294. 1
  18295. 1
  18296. 1
  18297. 1
  18298. 1
  18299. 1
  18300. 1
  18301. 1
  18302. 1
  18303. 1
  18304.  @mrblonde1264  Look, Mr Blonde (Tarantino was always overrated anyway), don’t come at me with nothing but bluster, and ‘I happen to believe in this and therefore you must believe in this, too’. It doesn’t work like that. Just because I dig chocolate ice cream, I’m not forcing you to dig it, too. It seems like you are ‘forcing’ me to be believe something based on negligible evidence, to say the very least, and I refuse to do so until you can do better. You know what you remind me of? Those fanatical Christians screaming: ‘repent or die!’ I’m here to tell you, some of us have critical faculties that haven’t (yet) atrophied. Here’s what I’m gonna tell you, and you may not like it: you are screaming at me because you, yourself, seriously doubt the ‘truth’ of what you’re bellowing. Can I point you to an apposite quote which sums up this better than I can: You are never dedicated to something you have complete confidence in. No one is fanatically shouting that the sun is going to rise tomorrow. They know it's going to rise tomorrow. When people are fanatically dedicated to political or religious faiths or any other kinds of dogmas or goals, it's always because these dogmas or goals are in doubt. Pirsig sums up much of the alien/extraterrestrial believers almost perfectly. In sum, if you really believed all this extraterrestrial visitation stuff you wouldn’t feel the need to force others to believe it also. I don’t work on faith; I work on evidence.
    1
  18305. 1
  18306. 1
  18307. 1
  18308. 1
  18309. 1
  18310. 1
  18311. 1
  18312. 1
  18313. 1
  18314. 1
  18315. 1
  18316. 1
  18317. 1
  18318. 1
  18319. 1
  18320. 1
  18321. 1
  18322. 1
  18323. 1
  18324. 1
  18325. 1
  18326. 1
  18327. 1
  18328. 1
  18329. 1
  18330. 1
  18331. 1
  18332. 1
  18333. 1
  18334. 1
  18335. 1
  18336. 1
  18337. 1
  18338. 1
  18339. 1
  18340. 1
  18341. 1
  18342. 1
  18343. 1
  18344. 1
  18345. 1
  18346. 1
  18347. 1
  18348. 1
  18349. 1
  18350. 1
  18351. 1
  18352. 1
  18353. 1
  18354. 1
  18355. 1
  18356. 1
  18357. 1
  18358. 1
  18359. 1
  18360. 1
  18361. 1
  18362. 1
  18363. 1
  18364. 1
  18365. 1
  18366. 1
  18367. 1
  18368. 1
  18369. 1
  18370. 1
  18371. 1
  18372. 1
  18373. 1
  18374. 1
  18375. 1
  18376. 1
  18377. 1
  18378. 1
  18379. 1
  18380. 1
  18381. 1
  18382. 1
  18383. 1
  18384. 1
  18385. 1
  18386. 1
  18387. 1
  18388. 1
  18389. 1
  18390. 1
  18391. 1
  18392. 1
  18393. 1
  18394. 1
  18395. 1
  18396. 1
  18397. 1
  18398. 1
  18399. 1
  18400. 1
  18401. 1
  18402. 1
  18403. 1
  18404. 1
  18405. 1
  18406. 1
  18407. 1
  18408. 1
  18409. 1
  18410. 1
  18411. 1
  18412. 1
  18413. 1
  18414. 1
  18415. 1
  18416. 1
  18417. 1
  18418. 1
  18419. 1
  18420. 1
  18421. 1
  18422. 1
  18423. 1
  18424. 1
  18425. 1
  18426. 1
  18427. 1
  18428. 1
  18429. 1
  18430. 1
  18431. 1
  18432. 1
  18433. 1
  18434. 1
  18435. 1
  18436. 1
  18437. 1
  18438. 1
  18439. 1
  18440. 1
  18441. 1
  18442. 1
  18443. 1
  18444. 1
  18445. 1
  18446. 1
  18447. 1
  18448. 1
  18449. 1
  18450. 1
  18451. 1
  18452. 1
  18453. 1
  18454. 1
  18455. 1
  18456. 1
  18457. 1
  18458. 1
  18459. 1
  18460. 1
  18461. 1
  18462. 1
  18463. 1
  18464. 1
  18465. 1
  18466. 1
  18467. 1
  18468. 1
  18469. 1
  18470. 1
  18471. 1
  18472. 1
  18473. 1
  18474. 1
  18475. 1
  18476. 1
  18477. 1
  18478. 1
  18479. 1
  18480. 1
  18481. 1
  18482. 1
  18483. 1
  18484. 1
  18485. 1
  18486. 1
  18487. 1
  18488. 1
  18489. 1
  18490. 1
  18491. 1
  18492. 1
  18493. 1
  18494. 1
  18495. 1
  18496. 1
  18497. 1
  18498. 1
  18499. 1
  18500. 1
  18501. 1
  18502. 1
  18503. 1
  18504. 1
  18505. 1
  18506. 1
  18507. 1
  18508. 1
  18509. 1
  18510. 1
  18511. 1
  18512. 1
  18513. 1
  18514. 1
  18515. 1
  18516. 1
  18517. 1
  18518. 1
  18519. 1
  18520. 1
  18521. 1
  18522. 1
  18523. 1
  18524. 1
  18525. 1
  18526. 1
  18527. 1
  18528. 1
  18529. 1
  18530. 1
  18531. 1
  18532. 1
  18533. 1
  18534. 1
  18535. 1
  18536. 1
  18537. 1
  18538. 1
  18539. 1
  18540. 1
  18541. 1
  18542. 1
  18543. 1
  18544. 1
  18545. 1
  18546. 1
  18547. 1
  18548. 1
  18549. 1
  18550. 1
  18551. 1
  18552. 1
  18553. 1
  18554. 1
  18555. 1
  18556. 1
  18557. 1
  18558. 1
  18559. 1
  18560. 1
  18561. 1
  18562. 1
  18563. 1
  18564. 1
  18565. 1
  18566. 1
  18567. 1
  18568. 1
  18569. 1
  18570. 1
  18571. 1
  18572. 1
  18573. 1
  18574. 1
  18575. 1
  18576. 1
  18577. 1
  18578. 1
  18579. 1
  18580. 1
  18581. 1
  18582. 1
  18583. 1
  18584. 1
  18585. 1
  18586. 1
  18587. 1
  18588. 1
  18589. 1
  18590. 1
  18591. 1
  18592. 1
  18593. 1
  18594. 1
  18595. 1
  18596. 1
  18597. 1
  18598. 1
  18599. 1
  18600. 1
  18601. 1
  18602. 1
  18603. 1
  18604. 1
  18605. 1
  18606. 1
  18607. 1
  18608. 1
  18609. 1
  18610. 1
  18611. 1
  18612. 1
  18613. 1
  18614. 1
  18615. 1
  18616. 1
  18617. 1
  18618. 1
  18619. 1
  18620. 1
  18621. 1
  18622. 1
  18623. 1
  18624. 1
  18625. 1
  18626. 1
  18627. 1
  18628. 1
  18629. 1
  18630. 1
  18631. 1
  18632. 1
  18633. 1
  18634. 1
  18635. 1
  18636. 1
  18637. 1
  18638. 1
  18639. 1
  18640. 1
  18641. 1
  18642. 1
  18643. 1
  18644. 1
  18645. 1
  18646. 1
  18647. 1
  18648. 1
  18649. 1
  18650. 1
  18651. 1
  18652. 1
  18653. 1
  18654. 1
  18655. 1
  18656. 1
  18657. 1
  18658. 1
  18659. 1
  18660. 1
  18661. 1
  18662. 1
  18663. 1
  18664. 1
  18665. 1
  18666. 1
  18667. 1
  18668. 1
  18669. 1
  18670. 1
  18671. 1
  18672. 1
  18673. 1
  18674. 1
  18675. 1
  18676. 1
  18677. 1
  18678. 1
  18679. 1
  18680. 1
  18681. 1
  18682. 1
  18683. 1
  18684. 1
  18685. 1
  18686. 1
  18687. 1
  18688. 1
  18689. 1
  18690. 1
  18691. 1
  18692. 1
  18693. 1
  18694. 1
  18695. 1
  18696. 1
  18697. 1
  18698. 1
  18699. 1
  18700. 1
  18701. 1
  18702. 1
  18703. 1
  18704. 1
  18705. 1
  18706. 1
  18707. 1
  18708. 1
  18709. 1
  18710. 1
  18711. 1
  18712. 1
  18713. 1
  18714. 1
  18715. 1
  18716. 1
  18717. 1
  18718. 1
  18719. 1
  18720. 1
  18721. 1
  18722. 1
  18723. 1
  18724. 1
  18725. 1
  18726. 1
  18727. 1
  18728. 1
  18729. 1
  18730. 1
  18731. 1
  18732. 1
  18733. 1
  18734. 1
  18735. 1
  18736. 1
  18737. 1
  18738. 1
  18739. 1
  18740. 1
  18741. 1
  18742. 1
  18743. 1
  18744. 1
  18745. 1
  18746. 1
  18747. 1
  18748. 1
  18749. 1
  18750. 1
  18751. 1
  18752. 1
  18753. 1
  18754. 1
  18755. 1
  18756. 1
  18757. 1
  18758. 1
  18759. 1
  18760. 1
  18761. 1
  18762. 1
  18763. 1
  18764. 1
  18765. 1
  18766. 1
  18767. 1
  18768. 1
  18769. 1
  18770. 1
  18771. 1
  18772. 1
  18773. 1
  18774. 1
  18775. 1
  18776. 1
  18777. 1
  18778. 1
  18779. 1
  18780. 1
  18781. 1
  18782. 1
  18783. 1
  18784. 1
  18785. 1
  18786. 1
  18787. 1
  18788. 1
  18789. 1
  18790. 1
  18791. 1
  18792. 1
  18793. 1
  18794. 1
  18795. 1
  18796. 1
  18797. 1
  18798. 1
  18799. 1
  18800. 1
  18801. 1
  18802. 1
  18803. 1
  18804. 1
  18805. 1
  18806. 1
  18807. 1
  18808. 1
  18809. 1
  18810. 1
  18811. 1
  18812. 1
  18813. 1
  18814. 1
  18815. 1
  18816. 1
  18817. 1
  18818. 1
  18819. 1
  18820. 1
  18821. 1
  18822. 1
  18823. 1
  18824. 1
  18825. 1
  18826. 1
  18827. 1
  18828. 1
  18829. 1
  18830. 1
  18831. 1
  18832. 1
  18833. 1
  18834. 1
  18835. 1
  18836. 1
  18837. 1
  18838. 1
  18839. 1
  18840. 1
  18841. 1
  18842. 1
  18843. 1
  18844. 1
  18845. 1
  18846. 1
  18847. 1
  18848. 1
  18849. 1
  18850. 1
  18851. 1
  18852. 1
  18853. 1
  18854. 1
  18855. 1
  18856. 1
  18857. 1
  18858. 1
  18859. 1
  18860. 1
  18861. 1
  18862. 1
  18863. 1
  18864. 1
  18865. 1
  18866. 1
  18867. 1
  18868. 1
  18869. 1
  18870. 1
  18871. 1
  18872. 1
  18873. 1
  18874. 1
  18875. 1
  18876. 1
  18877. 1
  18878. 1
  18879. 1
  18880. 1
  18881. 1
  18882. 1
  18883. 1
  18884. 1
  18885. 1
  18886. 1
  18887. 1
  18888. 1
  18889. 1
  18890. 1
  18891. 1
  18892. 1
  18893. 1
  18894. 1
  18895.  @worldclass4508  For me, it all flows from the individual level. Yes, authoritarianism and regimes that use this are inimical, but the general culture is what allows these to breed and flourish. I’ve spent some time looking at why humans are so awful to one another and my basic answer to these issues is as follows. The greatest problem humanity faces, and has always faced, is the one of ‘taking offence’. Note ‘taking’. No one can be offended against their will. You are fully complicit in the act of ‘being offended’. The only long-term solution to this is obvious. Train oneself to not be offended. By anything. Don’t hitch yourself so tightly to this or that identity (family, tribe, nation, race, religion, sex, sports team etc) such that when someone else says something, anything, about the aforementioned it will be impossible for you to take offence, quite simply as you have refused to subsume so much of your identity in the perceived target another attacks.🤓 In sum, if everyone were to simply widen their scope of identity to encompass everyone else, then many of our troubles would be solved instantly. I used to be fairly rigidly religious, fairly nationalistic, and fairly sensitive about a few other things when someone else criticised something I identified with. I’m no longer, as I have trained myself (it’s not that difficult) to not identify with anything smaller than the human scale, thereby obviating my falling into the fatal trap of in-grouping and out-grouping. You don’t even necessarily have to like these other humans, let alone love them; you simply see them as other humans who cannot possibly offend you and therefore there is no issue. Of course, the heavy-handed, authoritarian regimes/humans are still a big problem to solve as they come blundering at you with physical force, but this training oneself to have no intrinsic beef with another person, based on sex, national pride, race, sexuality, religion etc., is something we can all do, right now. 🤓
    1
  18896. 1
  18897. 1
  18898. 1
  18899. 1
  18900. While observing the bedlam being played out daily on our screens, I couldn’t help but be struck by how eerily similar this whole farrago is to Kubrick’s Dr Strangelove , with a slight tweaking of point-of-view, and flipping of roles, in which America is Russia and Russia is America. In Kubrick’s masterpiece, American Brigadier General Jack D Ripper (Putin), has been driven insane with paranoia by the events of the Cold War. (In Putin’s case insanity and monomaniacal post-Cold War paranoia at a loss and diminution of his beloved Russia, as was USSR.) Ripper has become convinced that there is a plot by the ‘Commies’ (USA/NATO in Putin’s case) to ‘sap and contaminate our precious bodily fluids’. (In Putin’s case to sap and contaminate the minds of the Russians, and the idea of a Greater Russian Empire.) Ripper decides to take pre-emptive, first-strike unilateral action by striking the USSR. (Putin’s pre-emptive strike on Ukraine, and by extension the West in general.) The B-52s, under Ripper’s command, go in and hydrogen bomb the USSR. (Mercifully, Putin has not yet gone this far.) The US president along with his back-room staff attempt to stop the bombers from delivering their payload. (We can only pray Putin has back-room staff strong enough and prepared to step in if he tries to fulfill his nuclear threat.) Here’s the rub, however, the only way to stop the bombers in Dr Strangelove ,is a recall code which only Ripper knows. (We must pray, even the atheists/agnostics amongst us, that with Putin, it’s not only him that has access to the button.) The US government tries to capture Ripper to get the recall code from him, but Ripper gets away. (Will we be able to stop Putin?) The really scary kicker in Kubrick’s film, however, is that the Soviets have built a doomsday machine that will launch enough missiles to destroy all life on Earth if an American nuclear bomb hits them. (I’m pretty confident Putin’s enemies - us - won’t go this far.) Eventually, Ripper is overpowered, but shoots himself before the recall code can be given. (An inside job on Putin, perhaps, before he can incinerate the planet?) One man ignores the recall code and piles headlong towards Moscow. (A member of Putin’s inner team, perhaps?) He attempts to drop the bomb (On Ukraine? On Europe? On America?) After some door-jamming black humour he opens the doors and rides down on the bomb. 💣 Moscow retaliates with horrifying consequences for the planet. (Surely the West won’t go this far.) Let’s hope that, in this case, life won’t imitate art.👀
    1
  18901. 1
  18902. 1
  18903. 1
  18904. 1
  18905. 1
  18906. 1
  18907. 1
  18908. 1
  18909. 1
  18910. 1
  18911. 1
  18912. 1
  18913. 1
  18914. 1
  18915. 1
  18916. 1
  18917. 1
  18918. 1
  18919. 1
  18920. 1
  18921. 1
  18922. 1
  18923. 1
  18924. 1
  18925. 1
  18926. 1
  18927. 1
  18928. 1
  18929. 1
  18930. 1
  18931. 1
  18932. 1
  18933. 1
  18934. 1
  18935. 1
  18936. 1
  18937. 1
  18938. 1
  18939. 1
  18940. 1
  18941. 1
  18942. 1
  18943. 1
  18944. 1
  18945. 1
  18946. 1
  18947. 1
  18948. 1
  18949. 1
  18950. 1
  18951. 1
  18952. 1
  18953. 1
  18954. 1
  18955. 1
  18956. 1
  18957. 1
  18958. 1
  18959. 1
  18960. 1
  18961. 1
  18962. 1
  18963. 1
  18964. 1
  18965. 1
  18966. 1
  18967. 1
  18968. 1
  18969. 1
  18970. 1
  18971. 1
  18972. 1
  18973. 1
  18974. 1
  18975. 1
  18976. 1
  18977. 1
  18978. 1
  18979. 1
  18980. 1
  18981. 1
  18982. 1
  18983. 1
  18984. 1
  18985. 1
  18986. 1
  18987. 1
  18988. 1
  18989. 1
  18990. 1
  18991. 1
  18992. 1
  18993. 1
  18994. 1
  18995. 1
  18996. 1
  18997. 1
  18998. 1
  18999. 1
  19000. 1
  19001. 1
  19002. 1
  19003. 1
  19004. 1
  19005. 1
  19006. 1
  19007. 1
  19008. 1
  19009. 1
  19010.  @paranoidrodent  You’re dead right about the richness and complexity of language and accents, certainly here in the UK, but also in France, with which I’m slightly less au fait. It almost changes village to village here in Scotland, never mind city to city. I’m fascinated at how, in this era of dominant globalisation, these accents and their differentiating minutiae have managed to survive, indeed, in some cases even strengthen, in the face of a wave of monolingual (English), mono-accented (mid-Atlantic) mainstream global culture that has been wittingly or otherwise, resisted by all those who still speak in a unique, distinct manner. Yeah, ‘Bienvenue …’ is a film I saw about a decade ago, and from hazy memory I recall it being a bit too free and easy with the lazy stereotypes (cultured southerners versus northern boors; it’s always sunny down south versus it’s grim up north etc), but I forgave this, in part because I giggled so much. It was smooth and a little too trite in its vision, but for a few diverting belly laughs it was just the ticket! Oh, where does one begin with Catholicism and its, erm, ‘philosophy’. First of all I knew, aged 9, when I asked my Catholic school R.E. teacher why there were no female priests and why the Pope was always a man and she shrugged at me and more or less said, ‘It’s God’s will’, that there and then this Catholicism malarkey was a bit rum, and not necessarily in a good way. ‘Oh, and why is God a man, Miss?’, well let’s just say the look on her face suggested an upstart like me asking such impertinent questions ought to disengage the brain and just accept it. It just was. Not good enough for me, even at that age, and when I looked into the whole shebang a little more and saw a benighted thinking (if you could call it such), denying women a choice in terms of their bodies’ reproductive status, banned abortions, under any circumstances, however horrendous, and wanted me to go into a wee booth and confess all my dirty thoughts to a, frankly creepy, stranger in a frock, well, I ran for the hills to breathe the clean air of a life without following unsubstantiated, and often pernicious, moral dictums enunciated by an invisible sky God. Atheism (or for me, agnosticism: call me weak) seemed a better option: a non-prophet organisation with no invisible means of support.
    1
  19011. 1
  19012. 1
  19013. 1
  19014. 1
  19015. 1
  19016. 1
  19017. 1
  19018. 1
  19019. 1
  19020. 1
  19021. 1
  19022. 1
  19023. 1
  19024. 1
  19025. 1
  19026. 1
  19027. 1
  19028. 1
  19029. 1
  19030. 1
  19031. 1
  19032. 1
  19033. 1
  19034. 1
  19035. 1
  19036. 1
  19037. 1
  19038. 1
  19039. 1
  19040. 1
  19041. 1
  19042. 1
  19043. 1
  19044. 1
  19045. 1
  19046. 1
  19047. 1
  19048. 1
  19049. 1
  19050. 1
  19051. 1
  19052. 1
  19053. 1
  19054. 1
  19055. 1
  19056. 1
  19057. 1
  19058. 1
  19059. 1
  19060. 1
  19061. 1
  19062. 1
  19063. 1
  19064. 1
  19065. 1
  19066. 1
  19067. 1
  19068. 1
  19069. 1
  19070. 1
  19071. 1
  19072. 1
  19073. 1
  19074. 1
  19075. 1
  19076. 1
  19077. 1
  19078. 1
  19079. 1
  19080. 1
  19081. 1
  19082. 1
  19083. 1
  19084. 1
  19085. 1
  19086. 1
  19087. 1
  19088. 1
  19089. 1
  19090. 1
  19091. 1
  19092. 1
  19093. 1
  19094. 1
  19095. 1
  19096. 1
  19097. 1
  19098. 1
  19099. 1
  19100. 1
  19101. 1
  19102. 1
  19103. 1
  19104. 1
  19105. 1
  19106. 1
  19107. 1
  19108. 1
  19109. 1
  19110. 1
  19111. 1
  19112. 1
  19113. 1
  19114. 1
  19115. 1
  19116. 1
  19117. 1
  19118. 1
  19119. 1
  19120. 1
  19121. 1
  19122. 1
  19123. 1
  19124. 1
  19125. 1
  19126. 1
  19127. 1
  19128. 1
  19129. 1
  19130. 1
  19131. 1
  19132. 1
  19133. 1
  19134. 1
  19135. 1
  19136. 1
  19137. 1
  19138. 1
  19139. 1
  19140. 1
  19141. 1
  19142. 1
  19143. 1
  19144. 1
  19145. 1
  19146. 1
  19147. 1
  19148. 1
  19149. 1
  19150. 1
  19151. 1
  19152. 1
  19153. 1
  19154. 1
  19155. 1
  19156. 1
  19157. 1
  19158. 1
  19159. 1
  19160. 1
  19161. 1
  19162. 1
  19163. 1
  19164. 1
  19165. 1
  19166. 1
  19167. 1
  19168. 1
  19169. 1
  19170. 1
  19171. 1
  19172. 1
  19173. 1
  19174. 1
  19175. 1
  19176. 1
  19177. 1
  19178. 1
  19179. 1
  19180. 1
  19181. 1
  19182. 1
  19183. 1
  19184. 1
  19185. 1
  19186. 1
  19187. 1
  19188. 1
  19189. 1
  19190. 1
  19191. 1
  19192. 1
  19193. 1
  19194. 1
  19195. 1
  19196. 1
  19197. 1
  19198. 1
  19199. 1
  19200. 1
  19201. 1
  19202. 1
  19203. 1
  19204. 1
  19205. 1
  19206. 1
  19207. 1
  19208. 1
  19209. 1
  19210. 1
  19211. 1
  19212. 1
  19213. 1
  19214. 1
  19215. 1
  19216. 1
  19217. 1
  19218. 1
  19219. 1
  19220. 1
  19221. 1
  19222. 1
  19223. 1
  19224. 1
  19225. 1
  19226. 1
  19227. 1
  19228. 1
  19229. 1
  19230. 1
  19231. 1
  19232. 1
  19233. 1
  19234. 1
  19235. 1
  19236. 1
  19237. 1
  19238. 1
  19239. 1
  19240. 1
  19241. 1
  19242. 1
  19243. 1
  19244. 1
  19245. 1
  19246. 1
  19247. 1
  19248. 1
  19249. 1
  19250. 1
  19251. 1
  19252. 1
  19253. 1
  19254. 1
  19255. 1
  19256. 1
  19257. 1
  19258. 1
  19259. 1
  19260. 1
  19261. 1
  19262. 1
  19263. 1
  19264. 1
  19265. 1
  19266. 1
  19267. 1
  19268. 1
  19269. 1
  19270. 1
  19271. 1
  19272. 1
  19273. 1
  19274. 1
  19275. 1
  19276. Always mistrusted overtly ‘political’ comedy of any stripe. Never understood this human compulsion many seem to have to put all their political eggs into a single basket. When I assess my views on each given topic I find I am ‘liberal’ in some, ‘green’ in others, ‘conservative’ in more and ‘socialist’ in a few. The rest I haven’t made my mind up yet. Blake’s dictum I always have in mind here when it comes to these things which, for me, are under constant review: The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind. Or even better, this from Emerson, which captures perfectly the predicament of those toeing a party line, come what may: A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood. Or this from the glorious Whitman: Do I contradict myself?/Very well then I contradict myself/I am large, I contain multitudes.) To bind yourself to ideas one day, and then to be doomed to defend them come what may, is not worthy of the thinking human being.😳
    1
  19277. 1
  19278. 1
  19279. 1
  19280. 1
  19281. 1
  19282. 1
  19283. 1
  19284. 1
  19285. 1
  19286. 1
  19287. 1
  19288. 1
  19289. 1
  19290. 1
  19291. 1
  19292. 1
  19293. 1
  19294. 1
  19295. 1
  19296. 1
  19297. 1
  19298. 1
  19299. 1
  19300. 1
  19301. 1
  19302. 1
  19303. 1
  19304. 1
  19305. 1
  19306. 1
  19307. 1
  19308. 1
  19309. 1
  19310. 1
  19311. 1
  19312. 1
  19313. 1
  19314. 1
  19315. 1
  19316. 1
  19317. 1
  19318. 1
  19319. 1
  19320. 1
  19321. 1
  19322. 1
  19323. 1
  19324. 1
  19325. 1
  19326. 1
  19327. 1
  19328. 1
  19329. 1
  19330. 1
  19331. 1
  19332. 1
  19333. 1
  19334. 1
  19335. 1
  19336. 1
  19337. 1
  19338. 1
  19339. 1
  19340. 1
  19341. 1
  19342. 1
  19343. 1
  19344. 1
  19345. 1
  19346. 1
  19347. 1
  19348. 1
  19349. 1
  19350. 1
  19351. 1
  19352. 1
  19353. 1
  19354. 1
  19355. 1
  19356. 1
  19357. 1
  19358. 1
  19359. 1
  19360. 1
  19361. 1
  19362. 1
  19363. 1
  19364. 1
  19365. 1
  19366. 1
  19367. 1
  19368. 1
  19369. 1
  19370. 1
  19371. 1
  19372. 1
  19373. 1
  19374. 1
  19375. 1
  19376. 1
  19377. 1
  19378. 1
  19379. 1
  19380. 1
  19381. 1
  19382. 1
  19383. 1
  19384. 1
  19385. 1
  19386. 1
  19387. 1
  19388. 1
  19389. 1
  19390. 1
  19391. 1
  19392. 1
  19393. 1
  19394. 1
  19395. 1
  19396. You lot are in complete denial. I’m no paid-up member of the environmental brigade, just someone who looks at the evidence. The evidence, the raw data is incontrovertible. Between 1901 and 2018, the average global sea level rose by 15–25 cm (6–10 in), or 1–2 mm per year. This rate is increasing; sea levels are now rising at a rate of 3.7 mm (0.146 inches) per year. Human-caused climate change is predominantly the cause, as it constantly heats (and thus expands) the ocean and melts land-based ice sheets and glaciers. Between 1993 and 2018, thermal expansion of water contributed 42% to sea level rise; melting of temperate glaciers contributed 21%; Greenland contributed 15%; and Antarctica contributed 8%. Because sea level rise lags changes in Earth temperature, it will continue to accelerate between now and 2050 purely in response to already-occurring warming; whether it continues to accelerate after that depends on human greenhouse gas emissions. If global warming is limited to 1.5 °C (2.7 °F), then sea level rise does not accelerate, but it would still amount to 2–3 m (7–10 ft) over the next 2000 years, while 2–6 m (7–20 ft) would occur if the warming peaks at 2 °C (3.6 °F) and 19–22 metres (62–72 ft) if it peaks at 5 °C (9.0 °F). Now, whichever way you cut it, the clear conclusion from all this is that a good part of the global warming we have seen over the past 200 years or so, is indeed largely caused by human activity, principally fossil fuel burning. Given this, it makes utter sense to phase out fossil fuels. With this caveat: we must do it sensibly. They will be needed for some time to come as the transition to renewables is made. Who knows? Given that we are currently in an inter-glacial period, 500 years down the line when we have stopped using fossil fuels, the planet might start a rapid cooling trend leading to that ever-promised next Ice Age, and there might be a desperate clamour to start burning fossil fuels as quickly as possible!
    1
  19397. 1
  19398. 1
  19399. 1
  19400. 1
  19401. 1
  19402. 1
  19403. 1
  19404. 1
  19405. 1
  19406. 1
  19407. 1
  19408. 1
  19409. 1
  19410. 1
  19411. 1
  19412. 1
  19413. 1
  19414. 1
  19415. 1
  19416. 1
  19417. 1
  19418. 1
  19419. 1
  19420. 1
  19421. 1
  19422. 1
  19423. 1
  19424. 1
  19425. 1
  19426. 1
  19427. 1
  19428. 1
  19429. 1
  19430. 1
  19431. 1
  19432. 1
  19433. 1
  19434. 1
  19435. Always mistrusted overtly ‘political’ comedy of any stripe. Never understood this human compulsion many seem to have to put all their political eggs into a single basket. When I assess my views on each given topic I find I am ‘liberal’ in some, ‘green’ in others, ‘conservative’ in more and ‘socialist’ in a few. The rest I haven’t made my mind up yet. Blake’s dictum I always have in mind here when it comes to these things which, for me, are under constant review: The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind. Or even better, this from Emerson: A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood. Or this from the glorious Whitman: Do I contradict myself?/Very well then I contradict myself/I am large, I contain multitudes.) To bind yourself to ideas one day, and then to be doomed to defend them come what may, is not worthy of the thinking human being.😳
    1
  19436. 1
  19437. 1
  19438. 1
  19439. 1
  19440. 1
  19441. 1
  19442. 1
  19443. 1
  19444. 1
  19445. 1
  19446. 1
  19447. 1
  19448. 1
  19449. 1
  19450. 1
  19451. 1
  19452. 1
  19453. 1
  19454. 1
  19455. 1
  19456. 1
  19457. 1
  19458. 1
  19459. 1
  19460. 1
  19461. 1
  19462. 1
  19463. 1
  19464. 1
  19465. 1
  19466. 1
  19467. 1
  19468. 1
  19469. 1
  19470. 1
  19471. 1
  19472. 1
  19473. 1
  19474. 1
  19475. 1
  19476. 1
  19477. 1
  19478. 1
  19479. 1
  19480. 1
  19481. 1
  19482. 1
  19483. 1
  19484. 1
  19485. 1
  19486. 1
  19487. Always mistrusted overtly ‘political’ comedy of any stripe. Never understood this human compulsion many seem to have to put all their political eggs into a single basket. When I assess my views on each given topic I find I am ‘liberal’ in some, ‘green’ in others, ‘conservative’ in more and ‘socialist’ in a few. The rest I haven’t made my mind up yet. Blake’s dictum I always have in mind here when it comes to these things which, for me, are under constant review: The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind. Or even better, this from Emerson: A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood. Or this from the glorious Whitman: Do I contradict myself?/Very well then I contradict myself/I am large, I contain multitudes.) To bind yourself to ideas one day, and then to be doomed to defend them come what may, is not worthy of the thinking human being.😳
    1
  19488. 1
  19489. 1
  19490. 1
  19491. 1
  19492. 1
  19493. 1
  19494. 1
  19495. 1
  19496. 1
  19497. 1
  19498. 1
  19499. 1
  19500. 1
  19501. 1
  19502. 1
  19503. 1
  19504. 1
  19505. 1
  19506. 1
  19507. 1
  19508. 1
  19509. 1
  19510. 1
  19511. 1
  19512. 1
  19513. 1
  19514. 1
  19515. 1
  19516. 1
  19517. 1
  19518. 1
  19519. 1
  19520. 1
  19521. 1
  19522. 1
  19523. 1
  19524. 1
  19525. 1
  19526. 1
  19527. 1
  19528. 1
  19529. 1
  19530. 1
  19531. 1
  19532. 1
  19533. 1
  19534. 1
  19535. 1
  19536. 1
  19537. 1
  19538. 1
  19539. 1
  19540. 1
  19541. 1
  19542. 1
  19543. 1
  19544. 1
  19545. 1
  19546. 1
  19547. 1
  19548. 1
  19549. 1
  19550. 1
  19551. 1
  19552. 1
  19553. 1
  19554. 1
  19555. 1
  19556. 1
  19557. 1
  19558. 1
  19559. 1
  19560. 1
  19561. 1
  19562. 1
  19563. 1
  19564. 1
  19565. 1
  19566. 1
  19567. 1
  19568. 1
  19569. 1
  19570. 1
  19571. 1
  19572. 1
  19573. 1
  19574. 1
  19575. 1
  19576. 1
  19577. 1
  19578. 1
  19579. 1
  19580. 1
  19581. 1
  19582. 1
  19583. 1
  19584. 1
  19585. 1
  19586. 1
  19587. 1
  19588. 1
  19589. 1
  19590. 1
  19591. 1
  19592. 1
  19593. 1
  19594. 1
  19595. 1
  19596. 1
  19597. 1
  19598. 1
  19599. 1
  19600. 1
  19601. 1
  19602. 1
  19603. 1
  19604. 1
  19605. 1
  19606. 1
  19607. 1
  19608. 1
  19609. 1
  19610. 1
  19611. 1
  19612. 1
  19613. 1
  19614. 1
  19615. 1
  19616. 1
  19617. 1
  19618. 1
  19619. 1
  19620. 1
  19621. 1
  19622. 1
  19623. 1
  19624. 1
  19625. 1
  19626. 1
  19627. 1
  19628. 1
  19629. 1
  19630. 1
  19631. 1
  19632. 1
  19633. 1
  19634. 1
  19635. 1
  19636. 1
  19637. 1
  19638. 1
  19639. 1
  19640. 1
  19641. 1
  19642. 1
  19643. 1
  19644. 1
  19645. 1
  19646. 1
  19647. 1
  19648. 1
  19649. 1
  19650. 1
  19651. 1
  19652. 1
  19653. 1
  19654. 1
  19655. 1
  19656. 1
  19657. 1
  19658. 1
  19659. 1
  19660. 1
  19661. 1
  19662. 1
  19663. 1
  19664. 1
  19665. 1
  19666. 1
  19667. 1
  19668. 1
  19669. 1
  19670. 1
  19671. 1
  19672. 1
  19673. 1
  19674. 1
  19675. 1
  19676. 1
  19677. 1
  19678. 1
  19679. 1
  19680. 1
  19681. 1
  19682. 1
  19683. 1
  19684. 1
  19685. 1
  19686. 1
  19687. 1
  19688. 1
  19689. 1
  19690. 1
  19691. 1
  19692. 1
  19693. 1
  19694. 1
  19695. 1
  19696. 1
  19697. 1
  19698. 1
  19699. 1
  19700. 1
  19701. 1
  19702. 1
  19703. 1
  19704. 1
  19705. 1
  19706. 1
  19707. 1
  19708. 1
  19709. 1
  19710. 1
  19711. 1
  19712. 1
  19713. 1
  19714. 1
  19715. 1
  19716. 1
  19717. 1
  19718. 1
  19719. 1
  19720. 1
  19721. 1
  19722. 1
  19723. 1
  19724. 1
  19725. 1
  19726. 1
  19727. 1
  19728. 1
  19729. 1
  19730. 1
  19731. 1
  19732. 1
  19733. 1
  19734. 1
  19735. 1
  19736. 1
  19737. 1
  19738. 1
  19739. 1
  19740. 1
  19741. 1
  19742. 1
  19743. 1
  19744. 1
  19745. 1
  19746. 1
  19747. 1
  19748. 1
  19749. 1
  19750. 1
  19751. 1
  19752. 1
  19753. 1
  19754. 1
  19755. 1
  19756. 1
  19757. 1
  19758. 1
  19759. 1
  19760. 1
  19761. 1
  19762. 1
  19763. 1
  19764. 1
  19765. 1
  19766. 1
  19767. 1
  19768. 1
  19769. 1
  19770. 1
  19771. 1
  19772. 1
  19773. 1
  19774. 1
  19775. 1
  19776. 1
  19777. 1
  19778. 1
  19779. 1
  19780. 1
  19781. 1
  19782. 1
  19783. 1
  19784. 1
  19785. 1
  19786. 1
  19787. 1
  19788. 1
  19789. 1
  19790. 1
  19791. 1
  19792. 1
  19793. 1
  19794. 1
  19795. 1
  19796. 1
  19797. 1
  19798. 1
  19799. 1
  19800. 1
  19801. 1
  19802. 1
  19803. 1
  19804. 1
  19805. 1
  19806. 1
  19807. 1
  19808. 1
  19809. 1
  19810. 1
  19811. 1
  19812. 1
  19813. 1
  19814. 1
  19815. 1
  19816. 1
  19817. 1
  19818. 1
  19819. 1
  19820. 1
  19821. 1
  19822. 1
  19823. 1
  19824. 1
  19825. 1
  19826. 1
  19827. 1
  19828. 1
  19829. 1
  19830. 1
  19831. 1
  19832. 1
  19833. 1
  19834. 1
  19835. 1
  19836. 1
  19837. 1
  19838. 1
  19839. 1
  19840. 1
  19841. 1
  19842. 1
  19843. 1
  19844. 1
  19845. 1
  19846. 1
  19847. 1
  19848. 1
  19849. 1
  19850. 1
  19851. 1
  19852. 1
  19853. 1
  19854. 1
  19855. 1
  19856. 1
  19857. 1
  19858. 1
  19859. 1
  19860. Always mistrusted overtly ‘political’ comedy of any stripe. Never understood this human compulsion many seem to have to put all their political eggs into a single basket. When I assess my views on each given topic I find I am ‘liberal’ in some, ‘green’ in others, ‘conservative’ in more and ‘socialist’ in a few. The rest I haven’t made my mind up yet. Blake’s dictum I always have in mind here when it comes to these things which, for me, are under constant review: The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind. Or even better, this from Emerson: A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood. Or this from the glorious Whitman: Do I contradict myself?/Very well then I contradict myself/I am large, I contain multitudes.) To bind yourself to ideas one day, and then to be doomed to defend them come what may, is not worthy of the thinking human being.😳
    1
  19861. 1
  19862. A big part of the uproar here, aside from half-naked men in stripper heels swinging around provocatively on ropes in a school classroom in front of pre-teens, is what is said surrounding ‘gender ideology’ when drags take the class. It’s clearly agenda-based. Can we just get this straight (pun intended) once and for all? Humans cannot change biological sex, which is determined at fertilization (genotype) and during embryonic development (phenotype). People may change many features of their lives, such as their interests, hobbies, diet, friends or careers. However, some facts are unalterable. A person’s genetic inheritance, their biological sex, (not culturally-determined gender), is an immutable characteristic. No amount of ‘gender-reassignment’ can alter the fact that if you were born with XY sex chromosomes, you will die with XY sex chromosomes, and if you were born with XX sex chromosomes, you will die with XX sex chromosomes. Most, but not all, people fall into one of these two biologically-determined sex categories. Hermaphroditism is rare but should be noted here. As is XX male syndrome, but even in these cases, their own biological chromosomal inheritance cannot be altered. A hermaphrodite cannot biologically ‘unhermaphrodite’ themselves. None of the foregoing means to say a person cannot choose to ‘identify’ as a man when biologically a woman, or a woman when biologically a man. It’s a free world, after all. And it also doesn’t mean to say a fella can’t don a frock or a woman can’t waltz around in a well-fitted suit and tie. Wear what you want. However, identifying as one of the supposed 73 ‘genders’ is no different to my ‘identifying’ as a pig, or a snake, or a fish, when all my unalterable biological wiring says I’m a human being.
    1
  19863. 1
  19864. 1
  19865. 1
  19866. 1
  19867. 1
  19868. 1
  19869. 1
  19870. 1
  19871. 1
  19872. 1
  19873. 1
  19874. 1
  19875. 1
  19876. 1
  19877. 1
  19878. 1
  19879. 1
  19880. 1
  19881. 1
  19882. 1
  19883. 1
  19884. 1
  19885. 1
  19886. 1
  19887. 1
  19888. 1
  19889. 1
  19890. 1
  19891. 1
  19892. 1
  19893. 1
  19894. 1
  19895. 1
  19896. 1
  19897. 1
  19898. 1
  19899. 1
  19900. 1
  19901. 1
  19902. 1
  19903. 1
  19904. 1
  19905. 1
  19906. 1
  19907. 1
  19908. 1
  19909. 1
  19910. 1
  19911. 1
  19912. 1
  19913. 1
  19914. 1
  19915. 1
  19916. 1
  19917. 1
  19918. 1
  19919. 1
  19920. 1
  19921. 1
  19922. 1
  19923. 1
  19924. 1
  19925. 1
  19926. 1
  19927. 1
  19928. 1
  19929. 1
  19930. 1
  19931. 1
  19932. 1
  19933. 1
  19934. 1
  19935. 1
  19936. 1
  19937. 1
  19938. 1
  19939. 1
  19940. 1
  19941. 1
  19942. 1
  19943. 1
  19944. 1
  19945. 1
  19946. 1
  19947. 1
  19948. 1
  19949. 1
  19950. 1
  19951. 1
  19952. 1
  19953. 1
  19954. 1
  19955. 1
  19956. 1
  19957. 1
  19958. 1
  19959. 1
  19960. 1
  19961. 1
  19962. 1
  19963. 1
  19964. 1
  19965. 1
  19966. 1
  19967. 1
  19968. 1
  19969. 1
  19970. 1
  19971. 1
  19972. 1
  19973. 1
  19974. 1
  19975. 1
  19976. 1
  19977. 1
  19978. 1
  19979. 1
  19980. 1
  19981. 1
  19982. 1
  19983. 1
  19984. 1
  19985. 1
  19986. 1
  19987. 1
  19988. 1
  19989. 1
  19990. 1
  19991. 1
  19992. 1
  19993. 1
  19994. 1
  19995. 1
  19996. 1
  19997. 1
  19998. 1
  19999. 1
  20000. 1
  20001. 1
  20002. 1
  20003. 1
  20004. 1
  20005. 1
  20006. 1
  20007. 1
  20008. 1
  20009. 1
  20010. 1
  20011. 1
  20012. 1
  20013. 1
  20014. 1
  20015. 1
  20016. 1
  20017. 1
  20018. 1
  20019. 1
  20020. 1
  20021. 1
  20022. 1
  20023. 1
  20024. 1
  20025. 1
  20026. 1
  20027. 1
  20028. 1
  20029. 1
  20030. 1
  20031. 1
  20032. 1
  20033. 1
  20034. 1
  20035. 1
  20036. 1
  20037. 1
  20038. 1
  20039. 1
  20040. 1
  20041. 1
  20042. 1
  20043. 1
  20044. 1
  20045. 1
  20046. 1
  20047. 1
  20048. 1
  20049. 1
  20050. 1
  20051. 1
  20052. 1
  20053. 1
  20054. 1
  20055. 1
  20056. 1
  20057. 1
  20058. 1
  20059. 1
  20060. 1
  20061. 1
  20062. 1
  20063. 1
  20064. 1
  20065. 1
  20066. 1
  20067. 1
  20068. 1
  20069. 1
  20070. 1
  20071. 1
  20072. 1
  20073. 1
  20074. 1
  20075. 1
  20076. 1
  20077. 1
  20078. 1
  20079. 1
  20080. 1
  20081. 1
  20082. 1
  20083. 1
  20084. 1
  20085. 1
  20086. 1
  20087. 1
  20088. 1
  20089. 1
  20090. 1
  20091. 1
  20092. 1
  20093. 1
  20094. 1
  20095. 1
  20096. 1
  20097. 1
  20098. 1
  20099. 1
  20100. 1
  20101. 1
  20102. 1
  20103. 1
  20104. 1
  20105. 1
  20106. 1
  20107. 1
  20108. 1
  20109. 1
  20110. 1
  20111. 1
  20112. 1
  20113. 1
  20114. 1
  20115. 1
  20116. 1
  20117. 1
  20118. 1
  20119. 1
  20120. 1
  20121. 1
  20122. 1
  20123. 1
  20124. 1
  20125. 1
  20126. 1
  20127. 1
  20128. 1
  20129. 1
  20130. 1
  20131. 1
  20132. 1
  20133. 1
  20134. 1
  20135. 1
  20136. 1
  20137. 1
  20138. 1
  20139. 1
  20140. 1
  20141. 1
  20142. 1
  20143. 1
  20144. 1
  20145. 1
  20146. 1
  20147. 1
  20148. 1
  20149. 1
  20150. 1
  20151. 1
  20152. 1
  20153. 1
  20154. 1
  20155. 1
  20156. 1
  20157. 1
  20158. 1
  20159. 1
  20160. 1
  20161. 1
  20162. 1
  20163. 1
  20164. 1
  20165. 1
  20166. 1
  20167. 1
  20168. 1
  20169. 1
  20170. 1
  20171. 1
  20172. 1
  20173. 1
  20174. 1
  20175. 1
  20176. 1
  20177. 1
  20178. 1
  20179. 1
  20180. 1
  20181. 1
  20182. 1
  20183. 1
  20184. 1
  20185. 1
  20186. 1
  20187. 1
  20188. 1
  20189. 1
  20190. 1
  20191. 1
  20192. 1
  20193. 1
  20194. 1
  20195. Always mistrusted overtly ‘political’ comedy of any stripe. Never understood this human compulsion many seem to have to put all their political eggs into a single basket. When I assess my views on each given topic I find I am ‘liberal’ in some, ‘green’ in others, ‘conservative’ in more and ‘socialist’ in a few. The rest I haven’t made my mind up yet. Blake’s dictum I always have in mind here when it comes to these things which, for me, are under constant review: The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind. Or even better, this from Emerson: A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood. Or this from the glorious Whitman: Do I contradict myself?/Very well then I contradict myself/I am large, I contain multitudes.) To bind yourself to ideas one day, and then to be doomed to defend them come what may, is not worthy of the thinking human being.😳
    1
  20196. 1
  20197. 1
  20198. 1
  20199. 1
  20200. 1
  20201. 1
  20202. 1
  20203. 1
  20204. 1
  20205. 1
  20206. 1
  20207. 1
  20208. 1
  20209. 1
  20210. 1
  20211. 1
  20212. 1
  20213. 1
  20214. 1
  20215. 1
  20216. 1
  20217. 1
  20218. 1
  20219. 1
  20220. 1
  20221. 1
  20222. 1
  20223. 1
  20224. 1
  20225. Always mistrusted overtly ‘political’ comedy of any stripe. Never understood this human compulsion many seem to have to put all their political eggs into a single basket. When I assess my views on each given topic I find I am ‘liberal’ in some, ‘green’ in others, ‘conservative’ in more and ‘socialist’ in a few. The rest I haven’t made my mind up yet. Blake’s dictum I always have in mind here when it comes to these things which, for me, are under constant review: The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind. Or even better, this from Emerson: A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood. Or this from the glorious Whitman: Do I contradict myself?/Very well then I contradict myself/I am large, I contain multitudes.) To bind yourself to ideas one day, and then to be doomed to defend them come what may, is not worthy of the thinking human being.😳
    1
  20226. 1
  20227. Always mistrusted overtly ‘political’ comedy of any stripe. Never understood this human compulsion many seem to have to put all their political eggs into a single basket. When I assess my views on each given topic I find I am ‘liberal’ in some, ‘green’ in others, ‘conservative’ in more and ‘socialist’ in a few. The rest I haven’t made my mind up yet. Blake’s dictum I always have in mind here when it comes to these things which, for me, are under constant review: The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind. Or even better, this from Emerson: A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, adored by little statesmen and philosophers and divines. With consistency a great soul has simply nothing to do. He may as well concern himself with his shadow on the wall. Speak what you think now in hard words, and to-morrow speak what to-morrow thinks in hard words again, though it contradict every thing you said to-day. — 'Ah, so you shall be sure to be misunderstood.' — Is it so bad, then, to be misunderstood? Pythagoras was misunderstood, and Socrates, and Jesus, and Luther, and Copernicus, and Galileo, and Newton, and every pure and wise spirit that ever took flesh. To be great is to be misunderstood. Or this from the glorious Whitman: Do I contradict myself?/Very well then I contradict myself/I am large, I contain multitudes.) To bind yourself to ideas one day, and then to be doomed to defend them come what may, is not worthy of the thinking human being.😳
    1
  20228. 1
  20229. 1
  20230. 1
  20231. 1
  20232. 1
  20233. 1
  20234. 1
  20235. 1
  20236. 1
  20237. 1
  20238. 1
  20239. 1
  20240. 1
  20241. 1
  20242. 1
  20243. 1
  20244. 1
  20245. 1
  20246. 1
  20247. 1
  20248. 1
  20249. 1
  20250. 1
  20251. 1
  20252. 1
  20253. 1
  20254. 1
  20255. 1
  20256. 1
  20257. 1
  20258. 1
  20259. 1
  20260. 1
  20261. 1
  20262. 1
  20263. 1
  20264. 1
  20265. 1
  20266. 1
  20267. 1
  20268. 1
  20269. 1
  20270. 1
  20271. 1
  20272. 1
  20273. 1
  20274. 1
  20275. 1
  20276. 1
  20277. 1
  20278. 1
  20279. 1
  20280. 1
  20281. 1
  20282. 1
  20283. 1
  20284. 1
  20285. 1
  20286. 1
  20287. 1
  20288. 1
  20289. 1
  20290. 1
  20291. 1
  20292. 1
  20293. 1
  20294. 1
  20295. 1
  20296. 1
  20297. 1
  20298. 1
  20299. 1
  20300. 1
  20301. 1
  20302. 1
  20303. 1
  20304. 1
  20305. 1
  20306. 1
  20307. 1
  20308. 1
  20309. 1
  20310. 1
  20311. 1
  20312. 1
  20313. 1
  20314. 1
  20315. 1
  20316. 1
  20317. 1
  20318. 1
  20319. 1
  20320. 1
  20321. 1
  20322. 1
  20323. 1
  20324. 1
  20325. 1
  20326. 1
  20327. 1
  20328. 1
  20329. 1
  20330. 1
  20331. 1
  20332. 1
  20333. 1
  20334. 1
  20335. 1
  20336. 1
  20337. 1
  20338. 1
  20339. 1
  20340. 1
  20341. 1
  20342. 1
  20343. 1
  20344. 1
  20345. 1
  20346. 1
  20347. 1
  20348. 1
  20349. 1
  20350. 1
  20351. 1
  20352. 1
  20353. 1
  20354. 1
  20355. 1
  20356. 1
  20357. 1
  20358. 1
  20359. 1
  20360. 1
  20361. 1
  20362. 1
  20363. 1
  20364. 1
  20365. 1
  20366. 1
  20367. 1
  20368. 1
  20369. 1
  20370. 1
  20371. 1
  20372. 1
  20373. 1
  20374. 1
  20375. 1
  20376. 1
  20377. 1
  20378. 1
  20379. 1
  20380. 1
  20381. 1
  20382. 1
  20383. 1
  20384. 1
  20385. 1
  20386.  @robertrussell2202  Every single thing you named as “British culture” is just random generic stuff and could (and does) equally apply to the 6 other countries I have lived in and at least 50 more I could randomly think of. Therefore, these things you list are not intrinsically “British”. Democracy ~ Ancient Athens, therefore not intrinsically British. Human Rights ~ Universal, and again first established in Ancient Greece, therefore not intrinsically British. Freedom ~ again this goes back to Ancient Greece, so not intrinsically British. Unity ~ not sure what you mean by this exactly as it’s so general as to be rendered meaningless. However, the concept of ‘unity’ almost certainly isn’t a British invention. Strength ~ Again, at this point you’re just plucking random words out of the air in the desperate hope they are intrinsically British. Strength? Wtf. Vision ~ dozens of other places I can think of have ‘vision’ (whatever that even means) and once again to co-opt this concept as intrinsically British is stretching it at best and complete and utter baloney at worst. It’s the latter. Civility ~ again, not a British invention. Moreover, I have travelled extensively on 4 continents and lived in 6 countries and I can think of many places where the people were more ‘civil’ and not so passive-aggressive as many Brits I encounter daily. Fairness ~ fairness is just a universal human trait. You either have it or you don’t and to nationalise it as you are doing for your jejune argument is desperate indeed. Manners ~ Again, not intrinsically British. I have met thousands of just as well mannered people as any well-mannered Brit you care to suggest and none of them were British. Humour ~ universal. Not intrinsically a British thing. Yes, I would argue in this case that there might be a certain British way of looking at things comedically, so I may actually give you this one. The liberator from tyranny ~ lol. The nation that colonised and enslaved and stole from others?! The ‘liberator from tyranny’?! Pmsl. Rather the opposite for a large part of British history. Half a point, Robert. When it comes to humour, I would agree with you that the British sense of humour is somewhat unique; but as with all the other things you randomly mentioned, humour isn’t intrinsically British in and of itself.
    1
  20387. 1
  20388. 1
  20389. 1
  20390. 1
  20391. 1
  20392. 1
  20393. A big part of the uproar here, aside from half-naked men in stripper heels swinging around provocatively on ropes in a school classroom in front of pre-teens, is what is said surrounding ‘gender ideology’ when drags take the class. It’s clearly agenda-based. Can we just get this straight (pun intended) once and for all? Humans cannot change biological sex, which is determined at fertilization (genotype) and during embryonic development (phenotype). People may change many features of their lives, such as their interests, hobbies, diet, friends or careers. However, some facts are unalterable. A person’s genetic inheritance, their biological sex, (not culturally-determined gender), is an immutable characteristic. No amount of ‘gender-reassignment’ can alter the fact that if you were born with XY sex chromosomes, you will die with XY sex chromosomes, and if you were born with XX sex chromosomes, you will die with XX sex chromosomes. Most, but not all, people fall into one of these two biologically-determined sex categories. Hermaphroditism is rare but should be noted here. As is XX male syndrome, but even in these cases, their own biological chromosomal inheritance cannot be altered. A hermaphrodite cannot biologically ‘unhermaphrodite’ themselves. None of the foregoing means to say a person cannot choose to ‘identify’ as a man when biologically a woman, or a woman when biologically a man. It’s a free world, after all. And it also doesn’t mean to say a fella can’t don a frock or a woman can’t waltz around in a well-fitted suit and tie. Wear what you want. However, identifying as one of the supposed 73 ‘genders’ is no different to my ‘identifying’ as a pig, or a snake, or a fish, when all my unalterable biological wiring says I’m a human being.
    1
  20394. 1
  20395. 1
  20396. 1
  20397. 1
  20398. 1
  20399. 1
  20400. 1
  20401. 1
  20402. 1
  20403. 1
  20404. 1
  20405. 1
  20406. 1
  20407. 1
  20408. 1
  20409. 1
  20410. 1
  20411. 1
  20412. 1
  20413. 1
  20414. 1
  20415. 1
  20416. 1
  20417. 1
  20418. 1
  20419. 1
  20420. 1
  20421. 1
  20422. 1
  20423. 1
  20424. 1
  20425. 1
  20426. 1
  20427. 1
  20428. 1
  20429. 1
  20430. 1
  20431. 1
  20432. 1
  20433. 1
  20434. 1
  20435. 1
  20436. 1
  20437. 1
  20438. 1
  20439. 1
  20440. 1
  20441. 1
  20442. 1
  20443. 1
  20444. 1
  20445. 1
  20446. 1
  20447. 1
  20448. 1
  20449. 1
  20450. 1
  20451. 1
  20452. 1
  20453. 1
  20454. 1
  20455. 1
  20456. 1
  20457. 1
  20458. 1
  20459. 1
  20460. 1
  20461. 1
  20462. 1
  20463. 1
  20464. 1
  20465. 1
  20466. 1
  20467. 1
  20468. 1
  20469. 1
  20470. 1
  20471. 1
  20472. 1
  20473. 1
  20474. 1
  20475. 1
  20476. 1
  20477. 1
  20478. 1
  20479. 1
  20480. 1
  20481. 1
  20482. 1
  20483. 1
  20484. 1
  20485. 1
  20486. 1
  20487. 1
  20488. 1
  20489. 1
  20490. 1
  20491. 1
  20492. 1
  20493. 1
  20494. 1
  20495. 1
  20496. 1
  20497. 1
  20498. 1
  20499. 1
  20500. 1
  20501. 1
  20502. 1
  20503. 1
  20504. 1
  20505. 1
  20506. 1
  20507. 1
  20508. 1
  20509. 1
  20510. 1
  20511. 1
  20512. 1
  20513. 1
  20514. 1
  20515. 1
  20516. 1
  20517. 1
  20518. 1
  20519. 1
  20520. 1
  20521. 1
  20522. 1
  20523. 1
  20524. 1
  20525. 1
  20526. 1
  20527. 1
  20528. 1
  20529. 1
  20530. 1
  20531. 1
  20532.  @HeySay3  Why not make a protest against something you see as primitive and stupid? If no one ever protested, no progess would ever be made on this planet. Whenever the topic of homophobia arises, I’m always a bit mystified. Why do certain people hate homosexuality with such a vehement passion? Well, religion is clearly the no.1 reason as, in my experience, when questioned the vast majority (90+%) of homosexuality-haters I encounter are holy rollers who believe in this or that unverified and unverifiable invisible sky daddy. In the case of the Abrahamic religions (Judaism, Christianity, Islam) with their respective books written by men (anecdotally, I find men in my orbit far more likely to be homophobic than women and, tellingly, these same men are often far more forgiving of lesbianism than they are of male-on- male homosexuality), the literalist faithful are required to believe that homosexual sex is sinful and forbidden and by the letter of the holy law actually punishable by death! ( If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. ~ Leviticus 20:13). No.2 is more than likely the classic closeted queer who just can’t accept their feelings and so actively pushes them away, for it is a truth universally acknowledged that those who express irrational homophobic sentiments are quite often repressed homosexuals themselves. Homosexual urges, when repressed out of shame or fear, can (and often are) expressed as homophobia. Freud famously called this process a “reaction formation” - the angry battle against the outward symbol of feelings that are inwardly being stifled. No.3 is the simple lack of basic education. When you grow up in a culture where the most important text is some primitive book written by fallible men 1000s of years ago, you know you’re going to bump up against some stupid, risible opinions which cannot be logically maintained without the appeal to a putatively omnipotent, omniscient ‘God’. In the same book of the Old Testament which institutes death for homosexual acts it also says: Ye shall keep my statutes … neither shall a garment mingled of linen and woollen come upon you. ~ Leviticus 19:19 As I said: stupid and risible. I have many petty prejudices, some rational and some irrational, but hating what someone consensually does sexually isn’t one of them. Hitherto, not one person has given me a single rational reason why I should hate homosexuality. I tend to dislike people and what they do in terms of their ideas, their beliefs, their opinions, their unthinking actions which harm others, their dress-sense etc., but not something over which they have utterly no say or control, and particularly not something which causes no essential harm to another. In this debate, it’s crucial to properly distinguish between ‘offence’ and ‘harm’. You cannot be offended against your will. If you are offended, you play an active role in being offended. A potential offence is offered and you choose whether or not to take that offence. No one can be offended without their own intrinsic consent. On the other hand, you can be harmed against your will. With homosexuality, so many people utterly uninvolved with and unrelated to the given homosexuals seem to be mortally offended. I say: so what? You’re offended. Deal with it. No one is harming you here. It’s none of your business so butt-out. Ultimately, hating homosexuality is like dissing people with a different skin colour. Pointless. Not only pointless, but utterly stupid and moronic, as no one chooses their skin colour, just as no one chooses their sexuality. But here’s the clincher for me: even if we did choose our skin colour and sexuality, it still wouldn’t bother me one iota that some random individual has a different skin colour or sexuality. The sooner we can move beyond this primitive nonsense as a species, the better. To me, being homophobic is a bit like feeling resentful of someone digging Uranus because you’re not an astronomer! 🔭 I repeat: Matt Healy essentially harmed no one.
    1
  20533. 1
  20534. 1
  20535. 1
  20536. 1
  20537. 1
  20538. 1
  20539. 1
  20540. 1
  20541. 1
  20542. 1
  20543. 1
  20544. 1
  20545. 1
  20546. 1
  20547. 1
  20548. 1
  20549. 1
  20550. 1
  20551. 1
  20552. 1
  20553. 1
  20554. 1
  20555. 1
  20556. 1
  20557. 1
  20558. 1
  20559. 1
  20560. 1
  20561. 1
  20562. 1
  20563. 1
  20564. 1
  20565. 1
  20566. 1
  20567. 1
  20568. 1
  20569. 1
  20570. 1
  20571. 1
  20572. 1
  20573. 1
  20574. 1
  20575. 1
  20576. 1
  20577. 1
  20578. 1
  20579. 1
  20580. 1
  20581. 1
  20582. 1
  20583. 1
  20584. 1
  20585. 1
  20586. 1
  20587. 1
  20588. 1
  20589. 1
  20590. 1
  20591. 1
  20592. 1
  20593. 1
  20594. 1
  20595. 1
  20596. 1
  20597. 1
  20598. 1
  20599. 1
  20600. 1
  20601. 1
  20602. 1
  20603. 1
  20604. 1
  20605. 1
  20606. 1
  20607. 1
  20608. 1
  20609. 1
  20610. 1
  20611. 1
  20612. 1
  20613. 1
  20614. 1
  20615. 1
  20616. 1
  20617. 1
  20618. 1
  20619. 1
  20620. 1
  20621. 1
  20622. 1
  20623. 1
  20624. 1
  20625. 1
  20626. 1
  20627. 1
  20628. 1
  20629. 1
  20630. 1
  20631. 1
  20632. 1
  20633. 1
  20634. 1
  20635. 1
  20636. 1
  20637. 1
  20638. 1
  20639. 1
  20640. 1
  20641. 1
  20642. 1
  20643. 1
  20644. 1
  20645. 1
  20646. 1
  20647. 1
  20648. 1
  20649. 1
  20650. 1
  20651. 1
  20652. 1
  20653. 1
  20654. 1
  20655. 1
  20656. 1
  20657. 1
  20658. 1
  20659. 1
  20660. 1
  20661. 1
  20662. 1
  20663. 1
  20664. 1
  20665. 1
  20666. 1
  20667. 1
  20668. 1
  20669. 1
  20670. 1
  20671. 1
  20672. 1
  20673. 1
  20674. 1
  20675. 1
  20676. 1
  20677. 1
  20678. 1
  20679. 1
  20680. 1
  20681. 1
  20682. 1
  20683. 1
  20684. 1
  20685. 1
  20686. 1
  20687. 1
  20688. 1
  20689. 1
  20690. 1
  20691. 1
  20692. 1
  20693. 1
  20694. 1
  20695. 1
  20696. 1
  20697. 1
  20698. 1
  20699. 1
  20700. 1
  20701. 1
  20702. 1
  20703. 1
  20704. 1
  20705. 1
  20706. 1
  20707. 1
  20708. 1
  20709. 1
  20710. 1
  20711. 1
  20712. 1
  20713. 1
  20714. 1
  20715. 1
  20716. 1
  20717. 1
  20718. 1
  20719. 1
  20720. 1
  20721. 1
  20722. 1
  20723. 1
  20724. 1
  20725. 1
  20726. 1
  20727. 1
  20728. 1
  20729. 1
  20730. 1
  20731. 1
  20732. 1
  20733. 1
  20734. 1
  20735. 1
  20736. 1
  20737. 1
  20738. 1
  20739. 1
  20740. 1
  20741. 1
  20742. 1
  20743. 1
  20744. 1
  20745. 1
  20746. 1
  20747. 1
  20748. 1
  20749. 1
  20750. 1
  20751. 1
  20752. 1
  20753. 1
  20754. 1
  20755. 1
  20756. 1
  20757. 1
  20758. 1
  20759. 1
  20760. 1
  20761. 1
  20762. 1
  20763. 1
  20764. 1
  20765. 1
  20766. 1
  20767. 1
  20768. 1
  20769. 1
  20770. 1
  20771. 1
  20772. 1
  20773. 1
  20774. 1
  20775. 1
  20776. 1
  20777. 1
  20778. 1
  20779. 1
  20780. 1
  20781. 1
  20782. 1
  20783. 1
  20784. 1
  20785. 1
  20786. 1
  20787. 1
  20788. 1
  20789. 1
  20790. 1
  20791. 1
  20792. 1
  20793. 1
  20794. 1
  20795. 1
  20796. 1
  20797. 1
  20798. 1
  20799. 1
  20800. 1
  20801. 1
  20802. 1
  20803. 1
  20804. 1
  20805. 1
  20806. 1
  20807. 1
  20808. 1
  20809. 1
  20810. 1
  20811. 1
  20812. 1
  20813. 1
  20814. 1
  20815. 1
  20816. 1
  20817. 1
  20818. 1
  20819. 1
  20820. 1
  20821. 1
  20822. 1
  20823. 1
  20824. 1
  20825. 1
  20826. 1
  20827. 1
  20828. 1
  20829. 1
  20830. 1
  20831. 1
  20832. 1
  20833. 1
  20834. 1
  20835. 1
  20836. 1
  20837. 1
  20838. 1
  20839. 1
  20840. 1
  20841. 1
  20842. 1
  20843. 1
  20844. 1
  20845. 1
  20846. 1
  20847. 1
  20848. 1
  20849. 1
  20850. 1
  20851. 1
  20852. 1
  20853. 1
  20854. 1
  20855. 1
  20856. 1
  20857. 1
  20858. 1
  20859. 1
  20860. 1
  20861. 1
  20862. 1
  20863. 1
  20864. 1
  20865. 1
  20866. 1
  20867. 1
  20868. 1
  20869. 1
  20870. 1
  20871. 1
  20872. 1
  20873. 1
  20874. 1
  20875. 1
  20876. 1
  20877. 1
  20878. 1
  20879. 1
  20880. 1
  20881. 1
  20882. 1
  20883. 1
  20884. 1
  20885. 1
  20886. 1
  20887. 1
  20888. 1
  20889. 1
  20890. 1
  20891. 1
  20892. 1
  20893. 1
  20894. 1
  20895. 1
  20896. 1
  20897. 1
  20898. 1
  20899. 1
  20900. 1
  20901. 1
  20902. 1
  20903. 1
  20904. 1
  20905. 1
  20906. 1
  20907. 1
  20908. 1
  20909. 1
  20910. 1
  20911. 1
  20912. 1
  20913. 1
  20914. 1
  20915. 1
  20916. 1
  20917. 1
  20918. 1
  20919. 1
  20920. 1
  20921. 1
  20922. 1
  20923. 1
  20924. 1
  20925. 1
  20926. 1
  20927. 1
  20928. 1
  20929. 1
  20930. 1
  20931. 1
  20932. 1
  20933. 1
  20934. 1
  20935. 1
  20936. 1
  20937. 1
  20938. 1
  20939. 1
  20940. As someone once said, if liberals won’t enforce borders, fascists will. The vast majority of people I’m aware of, including myself, have no issue with controlled, legal immigration. Where the issue becomes problematic for many, again including myself, is when there appears to be absolutely no control over the influx of potentially illegal immigrants, which is what we have seen over the past 5 years with the Channel boat crossings, with 764 in 2018, 1,900 in 2019, 8,404 in 2020, 28,526 in 2021, 45,756 in 2022 and on this trajectory, we could see 70,000 this year. Of course, not all these people will be illegal economic migrants, as a proportion will be genuine refugees and asylum seekers. However, this notwithstanding, the immigration issue, as it stands, appears utterly chaotic and out of control and is categorically no different than having a random individual (illegal migrant) breaking into your house and demanding they stay, and you have no real way of evicting them. Of course, if that individual were desperate and genuinely fearing for their life and general safety (asylum seeker), most people would take pity and provide support, but even then this has to be done in a controlled manner. Whether one likes it or not, in the world as we have established it these past few centuries, borders matter. Sovereign territories, like sovereign householders, should absolutely have the right to refuse entry to illegal entrants. For example, for the life of me I cannot understand why we are accepting of so many people from an intrinsically safe European country like Albania. If you’re a genuine refugee, legality and basic humanity tells us these people should be humanely processed and if in fear of their lives, granted asylum. However, with illegal economic migrants, it’s also in their interest to claim refugee status: in other words, a key component of going some way to resolving this issue is to hire more staff to process the applications. Another component would be to go to source, that is to the gangs organising all this. There should be much greater emphasis placed on breaking up these networks . Imo, giving the French £500 million quid is throwing good money after bad. Letting migrants leave French shores is so many fewer migrants France itself has to deal with, so it’s folly to assume they are going to be on the case in this regard. Sending illegal migrants elsewhere is also invidious. Can you imagine the uproar there would be if it were the other way, and if Rwanda, for example, chose to send tens of thousands of its illegal migrants to the UK? There would be rioting in the streets. Migration is not going to go away. Given this, there should be binding agreements between European nations whereby they intake mutually-agreed quotas. The whole issue is a tangled web. One final thing: we need to scotch this fallacy that the UK takes more than its fair share of refugees. In 2021 there were 148,200 asylum applications in Germany, 103,800 applications in France, 62,100 in Spain, 43,900 in Italy and 37,562 in the UK.
    1
  20941. 1
  20942. 1
  20943. 1
  20944. 1
  20945. 1
  20946. 1
  20947. 1
  20948. 1
  20949. 1
  20950. 1
  20951. 1
  20952. 1
  20953. 1
  20954. 1
  20955. 1
  20956. 1
  20957. 1
  20958. 1
  20959. 1
  20960. 1
  20961. 1
  20962. 1
  20963. 1
  20964. 1
  20965. 1
  20966. 1
  20967. 1
  20968. 1
  20969. 1
  20970. 1
  20971. 1
  20972. 1
  20973. 1
  20974. 1
  20975. 1
  20976. 1
  20977. 1
  20978. 1
  20979. 1
  20980. 1
  20981. 1
  20982. 1
  20983. 1
  20984. 1
  20985. 1
  20986. 1
  20987. 1
  20988. 1
  20989. 1
  20990. 1
  20991. 1
  20992. 1
  20993. 1
  20994. 1
  20995. 1
  20996. 1
  20997. 1
  20998. 1
  20999. 1
  21000. 1
  21001. 1
  21002. 1
  21003. 1
  21004. 1
  21005. 1
  21006. 1
  21007. 1
  21008. 1
  21009. 1
  21010. 1
  21011. 1
  21012. 1
  21013. 1
  21014. 1
  21015. 1
  21016. 1
  21017. 1
  21018. 1
  21019. 1
  21020. 1
  21021. 1
  21022. 1
  21023. 1
  21024. 1
  21025. 1
  21026. 1
  21027. 1
  21028. 1
  21029. 1
  21030. 1
  21031. 1
  21032. 1
  21033. 1
  21034. 1
  21035. 1
  21036. 1
  21037. 1
  21038. 1
  21039. 1
  21040. 1
  21041. 1
  21042. 1
  21043. 1
  21044. 1
  21045. 1
  21046. 1
  21047. 1
  21048. 1
  21049. 1
  21050. 1
  21051. 1
  21052. 1
  21053. 1
  21054. 1
  21055. 1
  21056. 1
  21057. 1
  21058. 1
  21059. 1
  21060. 1
  21061. 1
  21062. 1
  21063. 1
  21064. 1
  21065. 1
  21066. 1
  21067. 1
  21068. 1
  21069. 1
  21070. 1
  21071. 1
  21072. 1
  21073. 1
  21074. 1
  21075. 1
  21076. 1
  21077. 1
  21078. 1
  21079. 1
  21080. 1
  21081. 1
  21082. 1
  21083. 1
  21084. 1
  21085. 1
  21086. 1
  21087. 1
  21088. 1
  21089. 1
  21090. 1
  21091. 1
  21092. 1
  21093. 1
  21094. 1
  21095. 1
  21096. 1
  21097. 1
  21098. 1
  21099. 1
  21100. 1
  21101. 1
  21102. 1
  21103. 1
  21104. 1
  21105. 1
  21106. 1
  21107. 1
  21108. 1
  21109. 1
  21110. 1
  21111. 1
  21112. 1
  21113. 1
  21114. 1
  21115. 1
  21116. 1
  21117. 1
  21118. 1
  21119. 1
  21120. 1
  21121. 1
  21122. 1
  21123. 1
  21124. 1
  21125. 1
  21126. 1
  21127. 1
  21128. 1
  21129. 1
  21130. 1
  21131. 1
  21132. 1
  21133. 1
  21134. 1
  21135. 1
  21136. 1
  21137. 1
  21138. 1
  21139. 1
  21140. 1
  21141. 1
  21142. 1
  21143. 1
  21144. 1
  21145. 1
  21146. 1
  21147. 1
  21148. 1
  21149. 1
  21150. 1
  21151. 1
  21152. 1
  21153. 1
  21154. 1
  21155. 1
  21156. 1
  21157. 1
  21158. 1
  21159. 1
  21160. 1
  21161. 1
  21162. 1
  21163. 1
  21164. 1
  21165. 1
  21166. 1
  21167. 1
  21168. 1
  21169. 1
  21170. 1
  21171. 1
  21172. 1
  21173. 1
  21174. 1
  21175. 1
  21176. 1
  21177. 1
  21178. 1
  21179. 1
  21180. 1
  21181. 1
  21182. 1
  21183. 1
  21184. 1
  21185. 1
  21186. 1
  21187. 1
  21188. 1
  21189. 1
  21190. 1
  21191. 1
  21192. 1
  21193. 1
  21194. 1
  21195. 1
  21196. 1
  21197. 1
  21198. 1
  21199. 1
  21200. 1
  21201. 1
  21202. 1
  21203. 1
  21204. 1
  21205. 1
  21206. 1
  21207. 1
  21208. 1
  21209. 1
  21210. 1
  21211. 1
  21212. 1
  21213. 1
  21214. 1
  21215. 1
  21216. 1
  21217. 1
  21218. 1
  21219. 1
  21220. 1
  21221. 1
  21222. 1
  21223. 1
  21224. 1
  21225. 1
  21226. 1
  21227. 1
  21228. 1
  21229. 1
  21230. 1
  21231. 1
  21232. 1
  21233. 1
  21234. 1
  21235. 1
  21236. 1
  21237. 1
  21238. 1
  21239. 1
  21240. 1
  21241. 1
  21242. 1
  21243. 1
  21244. 1
  21245. 1
  21246. 1
  21247. 1
  21248. 1
  21249. 1
  21250. 1
  21251. 1
  21252. 1
  21253. 1
  21254. 1
  21255. 1
  21256. 1
  21257. 1
  21258. 1
  21259. 1
  21260. 1
  21261. 1
  21262. 1
  21263. 1
  21264. 1
  21265. 1
  21266. 1
  21267. 1
  21268. 1
  21269. 1
  21270. 1
  21271. 1
  21272. 1
  21273. 1
  21274. 1
  21275. 1
  21276. 1
  21277. 1
  21278. 1
  21279. 1
  21280. 1
  21281. 1
  21282. 1
  21283. 1
  21284. 1
  21285. 1
  21286. 1
  21287. 1
  21288. 1
  21289. 1
  21290. 1
  21291. 1
  21292. 1
  21293. 1
  21294. 1
  21295. 1
  21296. 1
  21297. 1
  21298. 1
  21299. 1
  21300. 1
  21301. 1
  21302. 1
  21303. 1
  21304. 1
  21305. 1
  21306. 1
  21307. 1
  21308. 1
  21309. 1
  21310. 1
  21311. 1
  21312. 1
  21313. 1
  21314. 1
  21315. 1
  21316. 1
  21317. 1
  21318. 1
  21319. 1
  21320. 1
  21321. 1
  21322. 1
  21323. 1
  21324. 1
  21325. 1
  21326. 1
  21327. 1
  21328. 1
  21329. 1
  21330. 1
  21331. 1
  21332. 1
  21333. 1
  21334. 1
  21335. 1
  21336. 1
  21337. 1
  21338. 1
  21339. 1
  21340. 1
  21341. 1
  21342. 1
  21343. 1
  21344. 1
  21345. 1
  21346. 1
  21347. 1
  21348. 1
  21349. 1
  21350. 1
  21351. 1
  21352. 1
  21353. 1
  21354. 1
  21355. 1
  21356. 1
  21357. 1
  21358. 1
  21359. 1
  21360. 1
  21361. 1
  21362. 1
  21363. 1
  21364. 1
  21365. 1
  21366. 1
  21367. 1
  21368. 1
  21369. 1
  21370. 1
  21371. 1
  21372. 1
  21373. 1
  21374. 1
  21375. 1
  21376. 1
  21377. 1
  21378. 1
  21379. 1
  21380. 1
  21381. 1
  21382. 1
  21383. 1
  21384. 1
  21385. 1
  21386. 1
  21387. 1
  21388. 1
  21389. 1
  21390. 1
  21391. 1
  21392. 1
  21393. 1
  21394. 1
  21395. 1
  21396. 1
  21397. 1
  21398. 1
  21399. 1
  21400. 1
  21401. 1
  21402. 1
  21403. 1
  21404. 1
  21405. 1
  21406. 1
  21407. 1
  21408. 1
  21409. 1
  21410. 1
  21411. 1
  21412. 1
  21413. 1
  21414. 1
  21415. 1
  21416. 1
  21417. 1
  21418. 1
  21419. 1
  21420. 1
  21421. 1
  21422. 1
  21423. 1
  21424. 1
  21425. 1
  21426. 1
  21427. 1
  21428. 1
  21429. 1
  21430. 1
  21431. 1
  21432. 1
  21433. 1
  21434. 1
  21435. 1
  21436. 1
  21437. 1
  21438. 1
  21439. 1
  21440. 1
  21441. 1
  21442. 1
  21443. 1
  21444. 1
  21445. 1
  21446. 1
  21447. 1
  21448. 1
  21449. 1
  21450. 1
  21451. 1
  21452. 1
  21453. 1
  21454. 1
  21455. 1
  21456. 1
  21457. 1
  21458. 1
  21459. 1
  21460. 1
  21461.  @marcfalsetti9381  One other addendum, as I feel it’s important in this debate. I will say it straight: anyone who chooses to adopt any unquestioned and not able to be questioned religious text as their guide to get through this sublunary existence is, in my opinion, simply someone feeling powerless. For whatever reason(s), there has been a felt inadequacy with who and what they are. Therefore they look outward in search of an ‘authority’ they can latch on to, something that ‘empowers’ their, hitherto, weak sense of self. This doesn’t matter one iota if it’s kept private and doesn’t intrude into the lives of others. Alas, all organised religions cannot claim immunity when they are imputed as being something very inimical to a settled, peaceful human existence, and mutual coexistence with others. I would say this: organised religion, along with nationalism/patriotism/tribalism, has been the cause of most egregious blood-letting in human history. I’m willing to bet, correct me if I’m wrong, that you would be quite prepared to defend your unsubstantiated, and unable to be substantiated, theories to the death. What I see with those who pick this or that religion/God, are simply frightened, powerless individuals seeking something they can wield to correct and assert that perceived self-emasculation. Any philosophy/faith/religion of any stripe, that feels the need to threaten potential adherents with an everlasting eternal Hell, on pain of not buying the creed, is a belief system very, very unsure of itself. Moreover, it is incredibly dangerous for the peaceful coexistence of humanity.😉
    1
  21462. 1
  21463. Jordan Peterson‘s 12 more (God help us all!) rules for life - an appraisal. Do not carelessly denigrate social institutions or creative achievement. Oh man. Come on! If I can’t slag off the mother-in-law you’ve thereby instantly removed 5% of my reason for getting up in the morning. Similarly, if I see a post-post-modern, abstract-expressionist post-impressionist painting in a gallery I reserve the right to draw a cock and balls over it. I want my artists figurative. Or at the very least, Italian. Imagine who you could be and then aim single-mindedly at that. Hmm … I’m imagining I could be Jordan Peterson. Oh, wait. The world isn’t big enough to contain TWO identical egos that large! Do not hide unwanted things in the fog. Especially if John Carpenter is lurking somewhere in that fog. Notice that opportunity lurks where responsibility has been abdicated. Ok, I think that makes sense. Are you saying that if I refuse to wash the dishes and decline to put the garbage out I’m on a blow-job promise that self same evening? Sounds good to me! Do not do what you hate. Yay! Jordan Peterson himself is telling me I don’t have to read a single thing he ever writes ever again! Thanks Jordy. 🙏 Abandon ideology. What, abandon the ‘ideology’ of condensing the incredible complexity of human life and existence into 12 cookie-cutter platitudes I once read in a bunch of fortune cookies? That ideology? Work as hard as you possibly can on at least one thing and see what happens. Well, since the age of about 13 I’ve been actively fulfilling this injunction and it’s nearly fallen off.😳 Try to make one room in your home as beautiful as possible. Can we agree on a corner of one room? A whole room just sounds extravagant and, frankly, a waste of my time when I’ve got rule 7 to be getting on with.😳 If old memories still upset you, write them down carefully and completely. Yes, they do. However, not sure writing them down will help. Can I not just do the more obvious, sensible thing and, er, like, well, forget them? Plan and work diligently to maintain the romance in your relationship. Yes, I buy my dick flowers at least every other Friday. Do not allow yourself to become resentful, deceitful, or arrogant. Ha! Ya got me. While I resent no one but the milk-man who ran away with the wife back in 1987 (I’m still working through it), and I have deceived no one since that time I pretended I was Jesus at a convention of atheist/agnostics, the ‘arrogant’ one still niggles. Yes, I have to admit that when in an almighty pickle, I do sometimes think: ‘What would Donald Lamont do?’ Sorry. Be grateful in spite of your suffering. Well, one of my avatars kinda said this about 2,600 years before Saint Jordan palmed it off as one of his own. But hey! plagiarism never hurt anybody when you’re trying to fool most of the people most of the time!😁 Note: Jordan Peterson will publish 12 more rules for life when he’s spent all the money he got from gullible fools buying the first 24. 🤔
    1
  21464. 1
  21465. Jordan Peterson’s 12 rules for life - an appraisal. Stand up straight with your shoulders straight. Unless you’re a peeping Tom and need to keep below that wall, otherwise that gorgeous, undressing next-door neighbour may spot you. Treat yourself like someone you are responsible for helping. In other words, pick up your own smelly socks, don’t litter, and make your own fucking bed! Befriend people who want the best for you. Well, this rests on your judgement of others’ character. If that’s shit, you’re fucked. Compare yourself to who you were yesterday, not the useless person you are today. This one totally contradicts the whole idea of self-improvement, for if I’m more useless today than I was yesterday, why am I even trying to self-improve?! Do not let your children do anything that makes you dislike them. Well, this assumes that you’re such an insane parental control freak with such a fascistic sense of keeping another in order that it’s not even worth considering, if only to save your own soul. Besides, kids need to make their own mistakes, so tough-titty if the parents can’t take this. Set your house in order before criticising the world. Well, if you’re a saint, perhaps. If you’re a messy flesh and blood human being then criticising the world is what gets most of us through the day, if the drugs aren’t working. Pursue what is meaningful, not what is expedient. Yeah, but that makes the enormous, unfounded assumption that any of this means anything whatsoever. Tell the truth, or at least don’t lie. I’m sorry, but that time my mother caught my porn stash under the bed, I had to lie and pin it on my twin brother, Tommy. Sometimes, lying just is the best policy and those who say otherwise are just liars. Assume the person you are listening to knows something you don’t. Ok. But this one falls down when it comes to my bank PIN number. Be precise in your speech. What ‘precise’ in one’s speech like Mr Jordan ‘why use 1 word when 21 will do?’ Peterson? Give me the conciseness of a Sam Harris any day. I’m sure Adam Sandler will concur. Do not bother children while they are skateboarding. Unless, that is, they are skateboarding all over your prize flowerbeds; then you can not only ‘bother’ them, but collar them and let them feel your hot garlicky breath on their cheeks. Pet a cat when you encounter one in the street. Unless, that is, the cat is frothing alarmingly at the mouth. Now where’s my publishing deal?😳
    1
  21466. 1
  21467.  @marcfalsetti9381  ‘The constants of God and the Bible are the reference points I personally use as my map towards the pursuit of righteousness and truth.’ Really? Have you looked closely and with any notion of a critical faculty at your God of the Old Testament recently? The God that is the ‘father’ (allegedly) of your personal saviour? Anyone, believer or non-believer, cannot, in my opinion, read the Old Testament and read about the nature of the character of God therein, and not be struck by something. This is, that that God is a quite horrendously brutal character, however way you want to cut it. I’m no particular fan of Richard Dawkins (a debate for another day), but, in my view, he was 100% spot on about his take on this Old Testament God: The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully. Now, Fry, for example, has used his empiricism, that is read this text, and seems to have come to the conclusion that this will not do. I happen to agree with him, although I am not an atheist. Fry, no doubt, has also interrogated the traditional ‘proofs’ cited for the existence of a God (personal or otherwise) and found them wanting. These proofs (Aquinas’ 5 ways) being : the unmoved mover, first cause, necessary being, argument from degree, and the teleological argument. Also in all this, I would question why and how individuals choose to believe in a given religion. Why, for instance, are you not praying to Mecca? After all, the God of Islam is yours. Why, for instance, are you not attending the Jewish temple on a regular basis? After all, the God of Judaism is yours. Wider than this. If you believe in a God, why not the God(s) of the Hindu tradition? Why, indeed, aren’t you following the Norse gods, or the Greek gods, or the Egyptian gods? I would suggest that you opted for the barbaric deity of the Old Testament is due to an accident of birth and the tradition you were/are culturally swimming in. If you had been born in Baghdad, you would be defending, more than likely, the Islamic version of your God. If you had been born in Tokyo, this conversation would, more than likely, be centred around the Buddhist or the Shinto religious inheritance. I hope you see my point. You have, as far as I can determine, opted to put your eggs in the Christian basket (case?) and the God of the Old/New Testament. You have opted for believing, something which is wholly your prerogative, in someone for which beyond the self-contradictory gospels, there is scanty historical evidence. But, for me, a non-atheist, and empiricist, you have chosen as your ‘map towards the pursuit of righteousness and truth’, a God of the quite most repulsive nature, on any dispassionate, unbiased reading, one could possibly imagine. As I say, this is your right.☀️
    1
  21468.  @marcfalsetti9381  A book with about 40 authors, cobbled together over 1500 years or so, is, with the best will in the world, not a book I can put much credence in, if you expect me to believe it in toto the ‘word of God’. No, for me, I cannot get beyond the sanguinary, revolting nature of the character therein we are expected to love/fear. (<A contradiction right there if ever I heard one). I am not willing to jettison my critical faculties and be browbeaten into believing something and someone so grotesquely nasty and vicious. Jesus? Well, as I said, after extensive research throughout my life, my conclusion is that he never historically existed. As I say, beyond the terribly self-contradictory and unreliable gospels there are a couple of nebulous mentions in the Judeo-Roman historical chronicles, but that’s not enough. The bottom line for me is you earn my love and respect. The Old Testament God singularly fails in this task. You, if I may say so, simply fit the pattern I outlined in my previous post, that is, swimming in the pre-ordained religious waters you were randomly born into. This, for me, is the single biggest reason you chose the Bible as your book of choice in the market of religious texts. You chose, as a Catholic, the one you were most familiar with. I repeat, if you had been born elsewhere on this planet, somewhere where Christianity is a minority religion, I’m willing to bet very good money you would be telling me your God was A.N. Other. And I’ve never placed a bet in my entire life! Anyway, all the best.✌️
    1
  21469. Jordan Peterson‘s 12 more (God help us all!) rules for life - an appraisal. Do not carelessly denigrate social institutions or creative achievement. Oh man. Come on! If I can’t slag off the mother-in-law you’ve thereby instantly removed 5% of my reason for getting up in the morning. Similarly, if I see a post-post-modern, abstract-expressionist post-impressionist painting in a gallery I reserve the right to draw a cock and balls over it. I want my artists figurative. Or at the very least, Italian. Imagine who you could be and then aim single-mindedly at that. Hmm … I’m imagining I could be Jordan Peterson. Oh, wait. The world isn’t big enough to contain TWO identical egos that large! Do not hide unwanted things in the fog. Especially if John Carpenter is lurking somewhere in that fog. Notice that opportunity lurks where responsibility has been abdicated. Ok, I think that makes sense. Are you saying that if I refuse to wash the dishes and decline to put the garbage out I’m on a blow-job promise that self same evening? Sounds good to me! Do not do what you hate. Yay! Jordan Peterson himself is telling me I don’t have to read a single thing he ever writes ever again! Thanks Jordy. 🙏 Abandon ideology. What, abandon the ‘ideology’ of condensing the incredible complexity of human life and existence into 12 cookie-cutter platitudes I once read in a bunch of fortune cookies? That ideology? Work as hard as you possibly can on at least one thing and see what happens. Well, since the age of about 13 I’ve been actively fulfilling this injunction and it’s nearly fallen off.😳 Try to make one room in your home as beautiful as possible. Can we agree on a corner of one room? A whole room just sounds extravagant and, frankly, a waste of my time when I’ve got rule 7 to be getting on with.😳 If old memories still upset you, write them down carefully and completely. Yes, they do. However, not sure writing them down will help. Can I not just do the more obvious, sensible thing and, er, like, well, forget them? Plan and work diligently to maintain the romance in your relationship. Yes, I buy my dick flowers at least every other Friday. Do not allow yourself to become resentful, deceitful, or arrogant. Ha! Ya got me. While I resent no one but the milk-man who ran away with the wife back in 1987 (I’m still working through it), and I have deceived no one since that time I pretended I was Jesus at a convention of atheist/agnostics, the ‘arrogant’ one still niggles. Yes, I have to admit that when in an almighty pickle, I do sometimes think: ‘What would Donald Lamont do?’ Sorry. Be grateful in spite of your suffering. Well, one of my avatars kinda said this about 2,600 years before Saint Jordan palmed it off as one of his own. But hey! plagiarism never hurt anybody when you’re trying to fool most of the people most of the time!😁 Note: Jordan Peterson will publish 12 more rules for life when he’s spent all the money he got from gullible fools buying the first 24. 🤔
    1
  21470. 1
  21471. 1
  21472. 1
  21473. 1
  21474. 1
  21475. 1
  21476. 1
  21477. Jordan Peterson‘s 12 more (God help us all!) rules for life - an appraisal. Do not carelessly denigrate social institutions or creative achievement. Oh man. Come on! If I can’t slag off the mother-in-law you’ve thereby instantly removed 5% of my reason for getting up in the morning. Similarly, if I see a post-post-modern, abstract-expressionist post-impressionist painting in a gallery I reserve the right to draw a cock and balls over it. I want my artists figurative. Or at the very least, Italian. Imagine who you could be and then aim single-mindedly at that. Hmm … I’m imagining I could be Jordan Peterson. Oh, wait. The world isn’t big enough to contain TWO identical egos that large! Do not hide unwanted things in the fog. Especially if John Carpenter is lurking somewhere in that fog. Notice that opportunity lurks where responsibility has been abdicated. Ok, I think that makes sense. Are you saying that if I refuse to wash the dishes and decline to put the garbage out I’m on a blow-job promise that self same evening? Sounds good to me! Do not do what you hate. Yay! Jordan Peterson himself is telling me I don’t have to read a single thing he ever writes ever again! Thanks Jordy. 🙏 Abandon ideology. What, abandon the ‘ideology’ of condensing the incredible complexity of human life and existence into 12 cookie-cutter platitudes I once read in a bunch of fortune cookies? That ideology? Work as hard as you possibly can on at least one thing and see what happens. Well, since the age of about 13 I’ve been actively fulfilling this injunction and it’s nearly fallen off.😳 Try to make one room in your home as beautiful as possible. Can we agree on a corner of one room? A whole room just sounds extravagant and, frankly, a waste of my time when I’ve got rule 7 to be getting on with.😳 If old memories still upset you, write them down carefully and completely. Yes, they do. However, not sure writing them down will help. Can I not just do the more obvious, sensible thing and, er, like, well, forget them? Plan and work diligently to maintain the romance in your relationship. Yes, I buy my dick flowers at least every other Friday. Do not allow yourself to become resentful, deceitful, or arrogant. Ha! Ya got me. While I resent no one but the milk-man who ran away with the wife back in 1987 (I’m still working through it), and I have deceived no one since that time I pretended I was Jesus at a convention of atheist/agnostics, the ‘arrogant’ one still niggles. Yes, I have to admit that when in an almighty pickle, I do sometimes think: ‘What would Donald Lamont do?’ Sorry. Be grateful in spite of your suffering. Well, one of my avatars kinda said this about 2,600 years before Saint Jordan palmed it off as one of his own. But hey! plagiarism never hurt anybody when you’re trying to fool most of the people most of the time!😁 Note: Jordan Peterson will publish 12 more rules for life when he’s spent all the money he got from gullible fools buying the first 24. 🤔
    1
  21478. 1
  21479. 1
  21480. 1
  21481. 1
  21482. 1
  21483. 1
  21484. 1
  21485. 1
  21486. 1
  21487. Jordan Peterson’s 12 rules for life - an appraisal. Stand up straight with your shoulders straight. Unless you’re a peeping Tom and need to keep below that wall, otherwise that gorgeous, undressing next-door neighbour may spot you. Treat yourself like someone you are responsible for helping. In other words, pick up your own smelly socks, don’t litter, and make your own fucking bed! Befriend people who want the best for you. Well, this rests on your judgement of others’ character. If that’s shit, you’re fucked. Compare yourself to who you were yesterday, not the useless person you are today. This one totally contradicts the whole idea of self-improvement, for if I’m more useless today than I was yesterday, why am I even trying to self-improve?! Do not let your children do anything that makes you dislike them. Well, this assumes that you’re such an insane parental control freak with such a fascistic sense of keeping another in order that it’s not even worth considering, if only to save your own soul. Besides, kids need to make their own mistakes, so tough-titty if the parents can’t take this. Set your house in order before criticising the world. Well, if you’re a saint, perhaps. If you’re a messy flesh and blood human being then criticising the world is what gets most of us through the day, if the drugs aren’t working. Pursue what is meaningful, not what is expedient. Yeah, but that makes the enormous, unfounded assumption that any of this means anything whatsoever. Tell the truth, or at least don’t lie. I’m sorry, but that time my mother caught my porn stash under the bed, I had to lie and pin it on my twin brother, Tommy. Sometimes, lying just is the best policy and those who say otherwise are just liars. Assume the person you are listening to knows something you don’t. Ok. But this one falls down when it comes to my bank PIN number. Be precise in your speech. What ‘precise’ in one’s speech like Mr Jordan ‘why use 1 word when 21 will do?’ Peterson? Give me the conciseness of a Sam Harris any day. I’m sure Adam Sandler will concur. Do not bother children while they are skateboarding. Unless, that is, they are skateboarding all over your prize flowerbeds; then you can not only ‘bother’ them, but collar them and let them feel your hot garlicky breath on their cheeks. Pet a cat when you encounter one in the street. Unless, that is, the cat is frothing alarmingly at the mouth. Now where’s my publishing deal?😳
    1
  21488. 1
  21489. 1
  21490. 1
  21491. 1
  21492. 1
  21493. 1
  21494. 1
  21495. 1
  21496. 1
  21497. 1
  21498. 1
  21499. 1
  21500. 1
  21501. 1
  21502. 1
  21503. 1
  21504. 1
  21505. 1
  21506. 1
  21507. 1