Comments by "Psongman" (@psongman9536) on "Constitutional law attorney predicts a 9-0 SCOTUS ruling in favor of Trump" video.

  1. Actually, where your reply could be misinterpreted is using the word, law, instead of the Constitution, there is quite a difference. Also, you made a statement you can't prove, about them relying on their feelings, shut up , we are tired of all you people just making stuff up, stop!
    7
  2. There was a lot of due process, more than a week of major legal proceedings. Will you people do your research before replying?
    3
  3. So wrong, there are rules and conditions (like being under 35) for example, so what are you people trying to prove, your arguments make no sense, they are nonsense!
    2
  4. Remember the good ole days when people didn't violate the Constitution!
    2
  5.  @LuckyFlesh  I type the Truth and those who don't accept it, must face the I've been easily deceived Circumstances!
    2
  6. NO, it doesn't , best go back and read it, militia man!
    2
  7. There is NO way, he can escape all of them, now especially the January 6th ones!
    2
  8.  @OnceShy_TwiceBitten  Wow, great reason, NOT!!!
    2
  9.  @kaisailor1  Go ahead, won't count in those two states, if all is upheld!
    2
  10. Who was acquitted of a crime?
    2
  11. Also, for the thousandth time, this is not a crime issue, but a qualifying one, are you people that ignorant?
    2
  12.  @stickcheck3045  I am talking about the Colorado Supreme Court, the lower court and the Maine's SOS rulings. Also, was told the January 6th Committee findings will help Smith convict the traitor and insurrectionist!
    2
  13. So wrong, there are rules and conditions (like being under 35) for example, so what are you people trying to prove, your arguments make no sense, they are nonsense!
    2
  14. Wrong, must have read the same reply a hundred times this week, stop deceiving the American people, with your untrue interpretation!
    1
  15. So wrong, there are rules and conditions (like being under 35) for example, so what are you people trying to prove, your arguments make no sense, they are nonsense!
    1
  16.  @KcityMikeThomas  close, but not exactly, the Senate Republicans will go down in American History for not holding Trump accountable!
    1
  17. I guarantee you the Supreme Court decision wont' be unanimous, though now you see how Trump set up his own defense attorneys by his changing of the guard. The problem for Trump is Jack Smith's case relating to January 6th, the House committee, that exposed all his criminal activities and now these states disqualifying the deceiver, will make his prosecution much easier to prove, in fact my Republican attorney, says it is a slam dunk one, case closed!
    1
  18. Do what to Trump, he incriminated himself. I read these kinds of replies daily, you sound like him, with this victim narrative, just more deceiving the American people!
    1
  19.  @Slavik1109  NO state is a Trump state anymore, he has NO chance ina general, NONE, those polls are worthless, we just took one at our busy Republican diner, Trump did horribly, we asked WHY,. they said they abandoned him after January 6th and all these indictments and some sadi that finally that insurrection issue was the last straw!
    1
  20. Irony, it's Truth, accept it, or face the I am easily deceived Consequences!
    1
  21.  @johnk8641  Who cares, they have one now, and it will hurt his chances in upcoming court proceedings!
    1
  22.  @JamesHopkins-ix9qj  What, he is now, what are you all talking about? Smith will convict Trump easily and he will spend many years in prison. I also believe Giuliani will get a steep prison sentence!
    1
  23.  @rone7478  Another person who keeps bringing up legal proceedings as crimes, not all fit into that category!
    1
  24. We don't want that insurrectionist and traitor who tried to overthrow a duly elected government, back anywhere, and neither should you and there are sections, articles and amendments iin the Constitution that prohibit certain candidates from running, if you don't know that, (age 35 for example) then you are clueless to the Truth!
    1