Comments by "Psongman" (@psongman9536) on "Fani Willis has no credibility left, and she needs to step aside: Georgia lawmaker" video.

  1. Not proven, if I have to type this out, one more time. I just watched ten podcasts that women hosted. Almost all of them, met their men at work. When this whole Willis-Wade issue dies down, people will look at it much differently!
    6
  2. Dismiss what, they have a strong case and have already gotten guilty verdicts, your reply is ridiculous!
    3
  3.  @Chris-tb8ys  It was a hearing, almost everyone replying under here doesn't know that, this is so overblown!
    2
  4. In his ruling, however why did he want Wade or Willis to drop out, they were co-workers in a relationship, wow, people in offices everywhere would be dismissed!
    2
  5. Sorry, not proven, for the 20th time under this post!
    2
  6. Really? I just watched ten podcasts that women hosted. Almost all of them, met their men at work. When this whole Willis-Wade issue dies down, people will look at it much differently!
    2
  7. haha, wow, you are cruel, in prison for having a relationship with a co-worker, offices all over the world would be empty, and the prisons would be full. Finally, she was not convicted of anything, so shut up!!
    2
  8. Sorry, not proven, she perjured herself. Do you know anything about the law?
    2
  9.  @maxsmart8954  I know, why is this such a big issue?
    2
  10. Maybe, but they weren't convicted of it so your reply is useless!
    2
  11. She has spent long hours on this RICO case and has already gotten some defendants to plead guilty. If having a relationship with a co-worker is grounds for any of this issue, then almost every workplace would need to be shut down!
    2
  12. Can't say that about her, besides she isn't, sending your reply on!!
    2
  13. I just watched ten podcasts that women hosted. Almost all of them, met their men at work. When this whole Willis-Wade issue dies down, people will look at it much differently!
    1
  14. wow, can't believe you said that about the judge, that is a felony, for libel, slander and defamation!
    1
  15. Another person saying that about a judge and since you named and exposed him, a felony, bye!
    1
  16. Waste, they already convicted a few defendants in this lawsuit. Justice needs to be rendered on others in this RICO concern, not just Trump!
    1
  17. Fired for what, she has not been proven guilty of any wrongdoing!
    1
  18. I just watched ten podcasts that women hosted. Almost all of them, met their men at work. When this whole Willis-Wade issue dies down, people will look at it much differently!
    1
  19. Not proven, you just don't understand the law!!!
    1
  20. I just watched ten podcasts that women hosted. Almost all of them, met their men at work. When this whole Willis-Wade issue dies down, people will look at it much differently!
    1
  21. sorry, have to prove perjury on her and Wade first. Do you people understand that?
    1
  22.  @bobtokarchic494 Don't think so, what does that have to do with this lawsuit, nothing. I have gone out with many co-workers, we did not plan to take over our business. Listen, talk to women and men who are your friends and you will get a different slant on this situation. This will all die down, once, the media stops exploiting it!!
    1
  23. What for ,, you people keep typing this out, makes no sense. She had a relationship with a co-worker and was not convicted of perjury!
    1
  24.  @BatPigPictures  those who want her removed, not hard to figure out!
    1
  25. OK, what laws did she break and was that proven, NO, you people need to shut up, your arguments are useless, and you are clueless!
    1
  26. What crimes, what are you talking about?
    1
  27. Agreed , but they have not gone to trial for perjury, so all these replies are useless and those making them are clueless!
    1
  28. I just watched ten podcasts that women hosted. Almost all of them, met their men at work. When this whole Willis-Wade issue dies down, people will look at it much differently!
    1
  29. Simple, because it was his ruling, that is what judges do, comprendez thomas?
    1
  30. Why, that was her job. She has already gotten a few defendants to plead guilty, who can testify against Trump and the others!
    1
  31. She wasn't even convicted of perjury ,she should sue the judge!
    1
  32. What for? I just watched ten podcasts that women hosted. Almost all of them, met their men at work. When this whole Willis-Wade issue dies down, people will look at it much differently!
    1
  33. Wow, are you all this ignorant, she was not convicted of perjury, do you even know the law, yeah, you don't in this legal situation!
    1
  34.  @newnoggin2  really, when will that happen. All you people acted like she was, ridiculous. There is no crime it wasn’t a trial. It was a hearing and it was determined that she should have used better judgement that is all.. deal with it.
    1
  35. In fact, from my following of this issue, only the rightish type, made a big deal of it. By the way, this was only a hearing, I told this to some of my friends and they said that made it less legally serious!
    1
  36.  @time2travel830  She benefitted, how do you know? I wish I could debate you people who make up unproven arguments!
    1
  37.  @BillyColeII-dr6dk  NO, they didn't, investigated and not proven, not proven ,not proven. Do you know what that phrase means, doesn't seem like it!!
    1
  38.  @time2travel830  I have no idea how a relationship at work, that ended, would have an impact on a lawsuit, regardless of mitigating circumstances!
    1
  39. Case won't be dismissed, where do you get that ridiculous idea from, they have already convicted 4 defendants and more to come, including Donald, justice must be rendered!
    1
  40. Doubt it! I just watched ten podcasts that women hosted. Almost all of them, met their men at work. When this whole Willis-Wade issue dies down, people will look at it much differently.
    1
  41. Right, but almost everyone replying in here, doesn't understand!
    1
  42. Why, he committed crimes and needs to held accountable, like the other defendants!
    1
  43. Criminal, name one crime she was convicted of, yeah, don't bother, NONE!
    1
  44. He did not say that, did you read the ruling, Now, I think she did, too, but not proven, got it?
    1
  45. Can't say that, sorry!
    1
  46. guilty of what, haven't seen anything proven yet?
    1
  47. NO, he couldn't, ignorant one, that would have to be a separate lawsuit, case closed!
    1