Comments by "Psongman" (@psongman9536) on "'UNPRECEDENTED': Constitutional attorney breaks down clause behind Trump ballot case" video.

  1. It's called JUISTICE< on the anniversary of January 6th!
    3
  2. What if you are 34 years old, don't have to be charged, you people are so clueless!
    2
  3. NO, it doesn't, watched about ten today, the anniversary. Give up that false narrative, ridiculous!
    2
  4.  @RickMcGuire-bl2vs  NO, they say it, if you can read!
    1
  5.  @RickMcGuire-bl2vs  I never said that they would not rule in Trump being qualified. You know, I am getting tired of all of you commenting with remarks that you make up from your deceived minds.
    1
  6.  @RickMcGuire-bl2vs  Well, I have been shoveling snow the past two days. I do pay attention, but the way you framed it, sounded like a made up claim, thanks for the decent reply, much appreciated!
    1
  7. There was a week long set of legal proceedings, best do your research before replying and don't post false claims!
    1
  8. What a joke, my Trumper roommate cant' stop laughing at your reply, you can't be serious!
    1
  9. Why, show me some Republican bills produced and passed, aHAHA,o don't bother, there aren't any!!!
    1
  10. He removed himself by incrimination!
    1
  11.  @burnedagain6187  NO, it doesn't, that is the biggest laugh of the past ten days, we just can't stop, Trump loses votes because of all these rulings!
    1
  12.  kissmyaxe531  Polls are totally worthless, take your own, and make them go to Truth Social, usually changes their minds!
    1
  13. He was the one who ruined it!!
    1
  14. Doesn't have to be, but he will be, these rulings made Jack Smith's prosecution easier, case closed!
    1
  15. Sorry, there are qualifying elements, if you don't know that, you are clueless!
    1
  16. What for, where did they violate the Constitution, you people just keep making stuff up on the fly, as you are not happy with the rulings!
    1
  17. Office of, easy to prove according to my Republican attorney!
    1
  18. Doesn't work that way, sorry!
    1
  19. Doesn't haver to be for this ruling, have had to type this out over a hundred times, you people are so ignorant!
    1
  20. What trial, you people have no idea what you are talking about, unless you are saying Jack Smith will convict Trump and send him and his band of thieves, er traitors, to prison for a long time!
    1
  21. Completely CONSTITUTIONAL, can you read?
    1
  22. STOP, he was not chosen, he was removed!
    1
  23. Really, they just ruled it was, where were you last week?
    1
  24. Right, have been pushing that argument for over three years. Trump's team doesn't even get it, that would mean his victory would have been invalid and all those down ballot. I showed this to some of my Trump supporter friends and they were shocked!
    1
  25.  @bradcraig5111  Oh, there will be a conviction all right and a long prison sentence as he raised the penalties, and he will never ever be president, he will get trounced if he runs against Biden, where would he got more voters after losing by over 7 million last election, then came January 6th, all these indictments and charges, and being labelled as in insurrectionist and a violator of the Constitution, case closed!
    1
  26.  @kimobrien.  That's right, where were you during the week long legal proceedings in Colorado, yeah, you don't bother to keep up or do your research, get back to us when you read the rulings, kim
    1
  27.  @kimobrien.  Can you show me where it says that in the Constitution as some one else said a similar thing last week and we went to the amendment and couldn't seem to find it?
    1
  28. OH, I remember now, this came up a few years ago, about the natural born citizen and age requirements, believe they were added back in 1787, believe that is before the civil war, do these qualifications count?
    1
  29. Did you read this reply, doesn't seem like it!!
    1