Comments by "Kora Na" (@korana6308) on "Ryan McBeth" channel.

@shantyman161 and what exactly prevents you from looking it up yourself? Donetsk is being shelled constantly with the same 155 mm NATO artillery shells and there's plenty of information about it in the Russian segment of the internet. That shelling that the author was referring to is not a single occurrence at all, in fact they received 5 shells that day if I'm not mistaken . All of them were 155 mm NATO type artillery shells. They are all the same type every time ... and the author of this video is playing d. like he doesn't know what it is... except that Donetsk is being bombarded with the same shells every time. and he is either playing d. or is very incompetent. I actually am in awe and disbelief at how slithering a person can be. He is either very d. (which is unlikely ) or is spreading misinformation on purpose... Which makes him a very treacherous person to put it lightly.
4
Except that this guy analysis was completely wrong and easily disproved with the official information of the round shelling... I actually am confused why he spreads misinformation on purpose, it's not like he can't use google translate to read the official information on the attack in Russian... So then he must be spreading misinformation on purpose? for what reason?
3
@S.Whinnley ehh just because it is written in Russian you can't trust it? Isn't the first logical thing IF you are trying to get to the truth is to at least mention it? the official reports of the people who are doing it as their routine job of analyzing those shellings , i. e. DPR people. They have a working jurisdiction system and investigate and make reports of every shelling and crime against humanity by the Ukranian soldiers military for a future tribunal prosecution against the neo Nazi regime in Kiev (and perhaps their allies). I mean why wouldn't you want to at least mention it? Even if you think they are lying (for an unclear reason to me), as a normal analyst wouldn't you want to at least touch on an official source??? at least mention it??? no??? and if you haven't done it... then it clearly means that this guy is deliberately misinforming people. either that or he is really bad at investigating and analyzing stuff... which this guy doesn't look like a complete f. to me, so he must be doing it on purpose.
2
@clacks78 why would I stop telling the truth? in fact it feels great cutting through western prop...nda bs , and enlightening people of the truth.
1
except that his analysis is completely wrong and is contradicted by the officials
1
Ahahaha, "loss of credibility" with the west. You are actually so st. it's beyond belief. Not understanding that all that US wants is exactly what they are doing right now. They are doing it on purpose, kill as many R. and U. in this conflict. You are either very naive and st. or spreading misinformation on purpose and perhaps working for the 'merican government.
1
@FulloutPostal ahahaha. "cites sources" analyzing some random photos on the internet ,and coming up with wrong conclusions, without even considering official sources... yes trust him. absolute. shh... eee... ple...
1
Except his analysis was completely wrong
1
👍👍
1
@tales-l6b It's not that. He just works for NAFO. Everything that he says is just pure w. propaganda designed to frame Russia. I can give you an example of his supposed "evidence" of a supposed Russia "shelling itself" ( there was a video from 2022) , where he accused Russia of shelling itself... completely missing all of the other shellings, somehow getting the direction wrong and somehow not getting the Ukr. positions right ( that particular shelling was coming from near Avdivka which was under Ukr. control in 2022, yet he "somehow" completely missed it and said that it was Russia that was "shelling itself" with no apparent reason...)
1
If you are a Russian, why can't you just read on official report and understand that this guy is spreading misinformation on purpose?
1
Except his analysis is completely wrong
1
Wow, you are pointing your friends at a guy who deliberately misinforms people? Why would he not at least mention an official report of the attack? Why is he doing all of his investigation from some random photos and videos? In the official reports they already did all the research for him, but he couldn't even care to mention it? can you guess why ? and why he is spreading misinformation on purpose? p. s. it was a 155 NATO type shell, also US knows about this . They are doing it exactly on purpose.
1
deluded person
1
@techpriest5452 no u
1