General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About

Kora Na
Binkov's Battlegrounds
comments

Comments by "Kora Na" (@korana6308) on "Binkov's Battlegrounds" channel.

fact - Russia has been gaining territory every single year.
9
You spew pro western propaganda and then get surprised when it's harder for you to earn any money with you content😂May be stop being a shill...
9
@archdornan8349 who said they can't? Russia hasn't even started yet. 150k troops are in the SMO zone, fending off 3 times that amount of the attackers.
7
Is that why demand for Russian weapons had increased to a historical height of 60 billion US Dollars?
7
That's not true. At the moment it is unknown how much damage it got. Most likely it is just damaged. As it wasn't hit directly. It only got shrapnel damage.
6
He was not even remotely right. It was just a NAFO propaganda piece from him.
5
I've been hearing this since 2022. And since then Russia has been gaining ground every single year, including this one.
5
Can you please explain to me how is it "not losing"? It's absolutely heading down the "rabbit hole" with no light in sight.
5
@kryphons9138 the times are changing, pro Russian bloc gets more money. Arabs are with Russia ( worlds oil fields) together with China ( worlds factory) etc etc. So Russia gets more money, and you can already see it by the softened rhetoric of propagandists. Before in 2022 and 2023 you weren't allowed to criticize their policies and opinion... and now you are slowly getting more and more comments with the other - truthful sight. Not because of anything but for a sole reason of money being slowly drenched ( for the reason described above) from the w.
5
Not "may lose" it already lost. The question at this is whether Russia will get it all or just a part of it.
4
Not everything, but mostly it is a propaganda piece framed a certain way... Russian arms exports had decreased since 2020s, including planes. Not because of any other factor other than it's increased domestic demand for it's own weapons. I am actually surprised that they fulfill their international contracts at all. But they have to do in order to at least have some basic presence in the international arms trade. After the SMO though the demand for Russian made weapons, including planes, would increase...
4
It's interesting how you didn't mention the Soviet unmanned turret program at all. Like on the T-74, Soviet Russia was leading the world with it's tank technologies.
3
@THE-X-Force the most exported and the most bribed to export are two completely different things. Especially in the military with the influence that the US has, it is less so about it's actual value and more so of bribes and influence over someones def. budget.
3
... Those factories were made by Russians back in the Soviet and Russian empire days. All of those factories that are in Ukraine were build by Russians for Russian needs. After Ukraine became independent in 1991 Ukraine didn't produce any new factories, but rather it destroyed most of them...
3
Lol. The exact opposite. Russia is the biggest winner in this. More troops in an SMO. They've struck a deal with an opposition ( plenty of videos of them not touching the Russian troops). Now the w. has to concentrate on the middle east. (which frees up the U. front for Russia) , as well as a few other reasons etc etc etc This is a full on win for Russia.
3
If you think 10 Km into the Russian border will destabilize it... then you've clearly missed History classes... Germany took 2 million square kilometers from Russia at it's largest extent. It was encircling Moscow and Saint Petersburg, along with Stalingrad. It only made them more resilient, and made them win the WW2.
3
@timw8250 They've been saying that they had lost much less, that's the thing. I can't quote the number here because it get's instantly censored lol, but by their supposed ratio was 1 : 10 ... (where in facts it's the exact opposite), but that's what they've been claiming according to their DoD and Yelensky.
3
There's a saying in Russian, a folklore wisdom: " He who shouts the loudest " get this thief" is a thief himself. " . They are doing it as an organization, and are diverging on others(genuine people) what they are doing themselves...
3
I think it's called day dreaming? How did it go in Vietnam for you? and what happened just recently in Afghanistan? did you win? oh wait... Russia did as well as in Syria... wakey wakey
3
That is actually a good idea. And it's quite easy to distinguish as well, just a simply neural AI algorithm that checks for that sort of stuff...
3
What incompetence are you talking about? And what generals did Russia lose??? On the grand scheme of things everything is going according to plan with a few mishaps of course here and there ... Around 1,5k Russian troops and a total of around 2k proRussian troops lost so far. It's hardly can be called incompetence for such a large conflict with a 100k Russian Force and around 50k proRussian troops, for a total of ~ 150k pro Russian troops... vs 600k sq. km. and 260k military personnel + 100k deployed reserves + ~30k or so international combatants + ~ up to 500k volkssturm . With a total opposing force of up to 1 mil... or so... combatants. It's hard to pinpoint the exact number of how many combatants (with weapons) are fighting on the Ukranian side ,but up to 1 milllion people is a good guesstimate. So taking in consideration that against Russian Forces the opposing force is much larger, with a good guesstimate of being around 10 times larger, the operation and losses have been going almost perfect so far ( considering the opposing force). As Russian losses are exactly 10 times less than on the Ukranian side.
2
@Gentleman...Driver All of those alleged deaths of generals are only confirmed by the Kievan regime and not by Russia. So considering that Kievan regime had lied before and keeps lying to this day ,(with almost every sentence) then there's no real reason to believe those claims of killed generals. You can only confirm of what has been confirmed by both sides ,and especially by Russian officials, otherwise it is all just speculations. I'm not saying that they couldn't have died, it is possible although unlikely. But without official confirmation by the Russians (or photographic proof), it is nothing more than a speculation. Just because you are saying that something had stalled it doesn't mean that it did. The advancement had slowed but not yet stalled by the very definition of that word. "Had all that time to prepare" not just Russia but the Ukraine as well, also Ukraine is being supported with infinite guns , volunteers, money and intel by the EU and NATO. My only advice to you is wait till the end of the operation/war before you judge anything. Drawing any intermittent conclusions now is irrelevant since the conflict is not over yet. And is not going to be over for few months. Wait till it's over , then we will all be able to judge whether it was successful or not.
2
@Gentleman...Driver Because if you are lying all the time, then there's no reason to believe anything you say the next time. If you don't lie, then it's the opposite. Quite a simple logic really. Other than whether this operation is going according to plan or not ( it is really hard to claim what the plan was without Russia officially declaring it, other than the originally stated goal of demilitarization and denаzification of Ukraine), Russian officials have not been caught on any lies so far with this conflict.
2
@Gentleman...Driver Give an example then.
2
How is that "a fart"? F35 is sh. I though everyone knew that already.
2
Surprisingly it was a great video overall, thought I obviously don't agree that it's obsolete. It's not obsolete as it is the future of tank warfare, which would come in a few years time. The whole confusion with the T14 tanks is that they were in LRIP phase (Low Rate Initial Production phase) which wasn't defined by Russia hence where all of this confusion comes from. The Abrams tank went through the same debacle. It originally had an LRIP phase too with the name M1 Abrams. Then it went into series production with a new name. The T14 Armata is just getting out of this LRIP phase and enters into small batch series production ( which wasn't communicated properly, hence why all of this confusion in the first place).
2
@fleekrushyt9410 Tell me you are Ukranian without telling me you are Ukranian ... LOL ! Don't tell me what to do and I'm not going to tell you where you should go. Your grammar is even worse than mine so you really shouldn't be talking . You seriously don't realize that only a Ukranian would say such a thing. It's really incredible how clueless someone could be. They were built by the Russians for the Russians , Malishev , Morozov, Antonov Nikolaev (wharf) etc. Those are all Russians...
2
@marcoperlini9761 I am not "the only person" I am A person. And it's not an opinion that's an objective reality. If everyone else is deluded in this c. section then it shouldn't be of my concern. People want to believe something, let them believe. Only then, when years pass, I get responses on my older comments telling me that "I was right" when everyone else had a different opinion... or haven't even thought about that. That's an absolute win for Russia at least for the time being short and mid term. And there are no two ways about it. Long term is probably also a win, but it is much harder to predict what is going to happen long term because the short term and mid term is shaping the new world now as we speak. This is 1943 in the middle of WW2. You can clearly tell that Russia is going to win, but it's hard to tell what is going to happen in the 1960s being in the 1943...
2
@palacete deal or no deal either way it's beneficial for Russia
2
@drfelren Mate, Ukraine is on full life support from the US. It had received more aid last year than it's GDP, just let that sink in for a moment... Ukraine is done as soon as the life support ends, which trust me won't be going for very much longer.
2
@matija4256 I think you've confused ukr. with Russia. Russia is defeating Nazis yet again. History repeats itself.
2
@Statueshop297 not really. It has quadruple redundancy systems. According to the latest leak from fb it's going to get restored. As the damage wasn't significant.
2
@Statueshop297 it doesn't have just one CPU, It has 2 fully autonomous system and you don't know if it's CPU has been damaged at all. Most likely not. It's just like damage to your PC case, which can lessen your cooling perhaps or make it look not pretty or lose some LED lights etc. But it won't affect your PCs performance. Same with this plane. Nothing that a recoating of stealth paint can't do.
2
@RichelieuUnlimited 😂😂I've been hearing this for 3 years straight. Meanwhile Russia is only getting stronger and stronger.
2
@jarsm1929 no they don't. Russia produces the best fighter jet planes now.
2
@BoringPet which ones? I think he is from the US.
2
@chadbrad8100 this channel couldn't be more pro uk. you clearly haven't followed it for a long time.
2
Russia has better tanks. They don't need to reverse engineer anything. It's literally the opposite. The west is trying to copy Russian autoloader design etc
1
@toninhosoldierhelmet4033 Since when the Su 57 is just a show piece? Did I miss something?
1
@downix It's not better. The T84 Oplot is worse than the T90M.
1
@usergiodmsilva1983PT they are accelerating since 2023 that's the point. 2022 Russia had gained ~100k sq. km. 2023 Russia had gained ~ 1k sq. km. 2024 Russia had gained ~ 5k sq. km.
1
He is a pro ukr. nazi .
1
We are just seeing the top of the iceberg though. Most of it's development is still secret. It it impossible to keep secret the whole iceberg ... but the way it works... the whole structure underneath ... we have pretty much no idea about.
1
@letsdebate839 Mate, how about we get past the propaganda and get to the actual facts. The actual numbers are showing the opposite. Russia is standing against the NATO alliance, yet it is advancing every year... 2022, + 100k sq. km. territory liberated overall. 2023 ( the supposed Uk. offen.) , + 2k sq. km. territories liberated overall, 2024, + at least 10k sq. km. territories liberated. So who is advancing and who is winning? may I ask you?
1
@Covfefe_Jelly what's there to know about??? Everything is already known more or less.
1
@Covfefe_Jelly It's quite simple. Any airframe that is build for a specific task is gonna be better than the multitool. What could be simpler to understand? It's not that hard, just some basic logic. Having the swiss knife is good, but any normal knife would do a much better job working as a knife, even though the swiss knife could accomplish more tasks technically. I would much rather pick a machete going through the jungle or to chop some wood. Than a swiss knife ( but for wood chopping an axe is still better).
1
@THE-X-Force There's is no such thing as sovereign. There are only 2 - 5 sovereign poles in the wo. . Depending on the definition, and everyone else follows one or the other pole. Again, there are much more going on in the world than just what meets the eye on the surface. i. e. balance of trade and dumping of certain technologies for equalizing the balance of trade between two countries is a thing. For which - the military deal is a must in for lobbying through the c. politicians - i. e. getting resources from AU and dumping the tech for the balance of trade etc etc etc... It is waay deeper than even the most educated people are aware of. Waay more intricate and intrenched. Yes. Every country is essentially tied to the trade of the $$$ which is now slowly crippling, but is still the dominant force behind everything in the trade of the world. Hence the world relations are also shaped around that axis of power. Which is controlled by the w. pole - the US . But the g. south ( i. e. Russia and it's allies) are rising. It's David vs Goliath thing. And we all know that the David wins in the end.
1
@THE-X-Force I don't care about the attention. Moreover 90% of my msgs are being deleted. So I have no interest explaining anything really (because it's all going to waste anyway, have done so many times. tens of hours of my life gone to nothing writing long and explanatory comments for nothing). But I find that at least warning people in their gullibility and blindness is perhaps the least thing that I could do for the good of humanity.
1
2 messages in this thread already got deleted of mine. So no real reason explaining further. That's my exact point. People living in a w. propaganda cocoon and are happy about it LOL
1
@THE-X-Force I think about objective reality. Designing a penguin and designing an eagle are the 2 completely different concepts of birds. No matter if you gave either or the most modern of electronics and sensors.
1
@Covfefe_Jelly I'm saying that it's sh. as a 5th gen dominance/superiority and attack fighter. Any airframe designed with that role of air superiority/dominance in mind (which is an NGAD design by the way) would be better in that role than the F35 as it's a bomber fuselage design (the best one for multirole capability). It's still a good bomber though. It's basically bread and batter of the USAF... but living on bread and butter is not enough. Got to add some meat and vegetables - i. e. specialized crafts. In my opinion they should stop the production immediately and focus on other crafts. Which is pretty much what Musk is proposing albeit with different words and wordings. But words don't really matter, actions do. And stopping it's production is what matters now. Focusing on other crafts. i. e. NGAAD, B21 and drones should be the priority. In an ideal world. Though I don't really like A. no more, so I don't really know whether I should be giving an advice at all, since you can see the reaction to it above already... Seeing it from the third perspective of shills destroying themselves because they don't have any grasp on the reality at all is just amusing to me... Like the reality is the exact 180 degree opposite lol... As much as the R. propaganda would have liked to intervened in this discourse to undermine it's adversary's strength. It is at this state ( and has been for like 20 years now), that the best course of actions, is not to intervene into this dialogue at all... Spend 0 money on it's influence. As the w. is happily creating it's own myths due to corruption and polarizing aggression, and then breaking it with some other myths etc etc etc never ending cycle of hyp. and li. ... ouroborus. And it's amusing to watch. lol
1
@Covfefe_Jelly That's the first time I hear a term tankie. I am not shilling for anyone though. Except for the truth, as my only guiding light is the truth.
1
@Covfefe_Jelly Stopping production means slowly producing less of them, and more of the other crafts/ preparing factories for production of other crafts. I'm shilling for the truth not for the other side per se. I personally don't like alot about the other side as well (not what is being said or is framed at on the surface). But at the core value as a base I see as the other side as an enlightened or the chosen one. Like Jesus carrying it's own cross on Golgotha. So ofcourse I will be cheering for Jesus, there's no question about that for me. Even though saying that you are/ I am supporting Jesus, will get his apostles/ followers crucified. I am going to chose Jesus anyway. But I do see the west ( and the US as it's dominant force) as parts of this whole symmetry or an equilibrium as Yin and Yang. As dark ( the w.) and the light ( the e. or Russia). In a sense a crucifixion which is the guiding light for humanity is only justified because of the darkness of the w. mentality. Without it there would be no Crucifixion of Christ (the Crucifixion could only happen in the dark and not in the light). So I don't really want it to go. It is what it is. But I'm obviously not gonna be cheering for the Roman soldiers. I am cheering for Jesus.
1
@Covfefe_Jelly Not just bombs. Missiles too. Any modern design bomber will carry missiles too. It started from the 4th gen - multirole bombers which were framed as multirole fighters because of their capability of carrying missiles on top of the bombs. So a 5th gen fighter bomber technically is a multirole fighter precisely because of that. That is capable of carrying missiles and not just bombs. But it still a bomber, albeit the most advanced fighter bomber in the world. Compare it to the Su34 fighter bomber, which came from a fighter fuselage body design of the Su27 - later Su30 and it's derivative which was a fighter designed craft of the 4th gen later to be widened and rebuilt as a fighter bomber craft in the Su34. But the F35 was designed as a bomber fuselage body from the ground up due to certain restrictions and goals. Again, I am not one of the people who is saying that it shouldn't have been built at all. 1k -2k should have been the limit. ~ 100 B2 (long range bomber), ~ 500 B21 (medium range bomber), ~ 1000 F35 (short range bomber). And making sure that everything is reliable and is serviced on the clock correctly and is in 100% working condition for the potential mass scale conflict (as it is not ready atm). Updating the systems as they age, and developing betters crafts in the meantime. Would have been a better strategy... Again not going to dive into it deeper. But there are plenty of nuances and historical details, starting from the collapse of the Soviet Union or even earlier... Of how it should have, could have, would have been... And what should have been done/built better. Doesn't really matter now. What matters is that the USAF composition right now is not ideal. As F35 are not capable enough for the diversity of the potential threats and tasks(hence why so many resources are throwing into advancements of the F15), not enough aircraft of other type of warfare. And not fast enough transitioning into the future gen and warfare crafts... (i. e. getting slowly overrun by R. and the e. in general), i. e. the stagnation that began in the early 2000s is catching up precisely now, after 20 years.
1
f35 crashed
1
@fleekrushyt9410 All of those engineers that you named never spoke Ukranian in their lives, they are all at best Soviet scientists but more so Russian and not Ukranian for sure. Just because you predisposition certain nicknames to being Ukranian doesn't mean that they are. I know it from my own family and experience as my last name is Omelchenko , and I have roots from what is now called a "Ukraine" . However my father was always offended when somebody had called him a "Ukranian" and had always considered himself a Russian. It is just that - an offensive curse for the Russian people to call them Ukranians. FYI most of those engineers/scientists (if not all) had always called themselves Russian/Soviet engineers and spoke only Russian and studied in Russian schools and institutions. Find me a single engineer from those days that had called himself a "Ukranian" engineer or a "scientist" , those people don't exist and never existed.
1
@fleekrushyt9410 It is funny how you completely ignored my point. All of those territories were historically Russian as "Kiev" was "the mother of Russian cities" which was said by Oleg in 882. Kiev was always a Russian spoken city and the language spoken there was always Russian (also Latin in Kiev Mogilansk Academia). The so called "Ukranian ism" is a modern nationalists invention, that has never existed in history before , so yes... All of those people were Russian (Ruskije), and they studied in Russian cities, as there were no distinction between Malorossijyan and Velikorossijan cities - they were all Russian. Moreover they are/ we are were always blood related as half of Russians had roots in what is now "Ukraine", and half of Ukranians has roots in modern day Russia. So that argument is really irrelevant as there was no "Ukranian" science or engineering as there were no Ukranians as a nation before 1991. That nation was only developed in the 20th century.
1
@fleekrushyt9410 lets see who is a propaganda bot? shall we? lets talk face to face (with the camera)?
1
@danialnajmuddin3729 That and also Russian industry can't fulfill it's heavy demand for weapons at the moment. Russia has the lowest amount of unemployed people (it's around 2%) right now in the world. Whilst Russian queue for Russian made arms procurement had increased to record levels and hit a historical high of $60 billion USD dollars just a month ago. That is the numbers of already ordered Russian weapons, that Russia had promised to deliver to it's international partners. So as soon as their industry will be able to increase it's throughput, only then it will be able to increase it's arms exports (including planes). But most likely it would happen only after an SMO...
1
@marcoperlini9761 That's a really big win. Russia didn't own the main oil fields it controlled only some of the t. routs. But the majority of the money was controlled by the US in the East. So it wasn't all that favorable to Russia unless it was going to open a conflict against the US... And now it doesn't have to do anything the conflict will be between different parties of the ex allies, so Russia could just rip the benefits off of the conflict as it is. The base itself again is not that crucial as there could be other places like Egypt in the Mediterranean for the base ( also it could make an agreement with the rebels to remain in Syria... at this point we just don't know yet). It's an overall win win for Russia at least in short and mid term in relation to the SMO. An absolute win, which is what Russia needs now. Winning an SMO 100% would solve any other issue that it has or would have in the future etc. And long term it's honestly hard to predict, as there are too many sides are involved, but if it really wanted to it still has that card of restoring the Assads regime if it wanted to potentially into the future. After an SMO. But honestly I do not think that it will be doing that but we shall see, as again it's too hard to predict anything at this point. The only thing that is certain, again, is that it's extremely beneficial for it in terms of resolvement of an SMO conflict. And it's all that Russia needs right now. Not Syria per se.
1
@wilsonsantiago3095 Can it? Everything suggests that it can't.
1
@wilsonsantiago3095 all the power to you brother, but unfortunately in so many years. I've seen way too many promises on tech deliveries and they usually just fall short. 90% of the time. So I will believe it when I see it. But good luck with that.
1
LOL. It's literally the EXACT OPPOSITE. That's why it's funny. It hurts the US building more of those. More than what it already has. It would strengthen the US if the def. budget money were spent on something else. That's what's funny about it. The US shills are destroying themselves. As Russia doesn't have to do anything with it. Russia just needs to stay back lol. You guys are literally destroying the US from within with those wrongful statements. Because area completely clueless LOL. Painting a picture the exact opposite of the reality, and doing so aggressively destroys the US (hence why the founding fathers liberalism, which is now gone, was always the saviour of the US in the past lol... Not anymore because it became a communist country.)
1
They have AESA radars on Su 57 and Su 35
1
He is a pro ukr. supporter that's why I disliked the video too. Please don't spread misinfo. If you pro ukro nazi, you should have liked his video.
1
The only problem with that, is that the whole purpose of those drones is to be stealthy , but you only get stealth with 5th gen jets and not with 4th gen. Pretty much 4th gen is capable of pretty much anything in the next 30 - 40 years except for it's only weakness - non stealth capabilities. So you need 5th gen jets for that. And currently, the only expandable 5th gen fighter jets are the F35s. You can't use older models for that.
1
@EngineerMFB The w. started it. In 2014. Russia lost like tens of billions of $$$ of it's investments... So follow the money, who profited from it (hint, not Russia). Ruusia is only repsonding.
1
@EngineerMFB not Crimea, as it was just a response. It had given 10s of billions of $$$ through Yanukovich which uk. had claimed that it wasn't gonna pay after Midan. Putin had mentioned it several times but nobody was really listening. So by doing Midan they stole tens of billions of dollars from Russia. They started it and not the other way around.
1
@EngineerMFB whatever those basics are those were Russian people's money landed to Ukraine, authorized by the Uk. gov. at the time. You can not just steal it... Also people "revolting against him" is a whole another topic. There were 100k thousand people who "revolted" It was 100% stooged.
1
@EngineerMFB LOL "steal it through Yanukovich" even if it was SO (and it's not) it was RUSSIAN MONEY. Thing that you guys don't seem to grasp. Russia is not an empty space... It's a whole civilization with it's interests. You can't just take a honey from a bear and expect him to just aimlessly stand there and listen to your arguments LOL. It was 100% stooged, absolute minority was supporting it. But that's a whole another topic.
1
@EngineerMFB my messages get censored. when you can't win an argument have to censor it. gg
1
@Statueshop297 you mean western forces?
1
@tranquoccuong890-its-orge It has been confirmed already that it went on being restored. So as predicted ( as always ) the west and those news were wrong again , and were just wishful thinking from their end.
1
@RRHandle you dont get it he is a bt himself
1
@RichelieuUnlimited You are mission one important detail. The demographics. It has lost 30 mil over 30 years. It has 20 mil more. It can't last more than 30 years. Simply won't be enough people.
1
@KolyanKolyanitch Yes I've seen it. 3% growth this year and around 2 % projected growth next year. Russia is swimming in prosperity whilst the other world is going into a recession.
1
@KolyanKolyanitch who has an inflation at 2%? Certainly not in my country. Everything like doubled in price in 3 years. And Russian inflation is actually much less than in my country. Inflation is just a cost depreciation of the currency, it does not speak of the economy in of itself, which is again, is GROWING in Russia. The key rate is there for a reason is to keep the economy and it's macroeconomics safe and it's doing it's job. Russia is literally getting through the storm in a giant reinforced steel cruise ship whilst everyone else is on a boat... and you have an audacity to complain... 🤦‍♂
1
@KolyanKolyanitch First of all, I don't understand why you are focusing on the inflation since we were specifically talking about the Russian economy and it's development... And it's growing according to every projection and every analysis that I've ever read. Second of all I don't understand why you are lying, Russians are spending much less of their income on food than in Europe. With an average income of 80k rubles, you spend around 20k on food. That's 1/4 or 25%. Also I don't know how you are sending money to Russia, because I can't do it. But if you do, it's not because Russia is doing poorly but more so because it's currency is devalued 4 times compared to Euro or USD. So you get 4 times the value for your dollar when you transfer it to Russia, which would be a sensible thing to do. By the way, there are jobs in Russia as well that will pay you good $$$, disregarding the SMO where you get 300k rubles per month, you can get a job in the north of Russia in the oil and mining industry with a salary of of 200k rubles. Which is a good salary. Russia is literally much more prosperous than the w. and it's growth and it's potential growth, nothing can stop it.
1
@kryphons9138 my responses are getting deleted and censored now. So I can't even respond to your comment lolz.
1
@Omega0850 trying to shield yourself from the reality of things is not gonna help. Before 2022 there wasn't as much censoring. Yet I got censored like 20 percent of the time. After 2022 like half of my messages get censored as you aren't allowed to see the whole picture anyway. Nothing is preventing you from criticizing Russia inside Russia. In fact I've been criticizing them many times on many Russian channels and I feel much safer and free because they are allowing you to criticize them for the most part... On the contrary, as soon as I criticize the west on any popular youtube channel with millions of subscribers ( any of them that look flashy and "fun") like this "task and purpose channel" for example. My message got immediately removed and I got a warning from youtube. That I am not allowed to have an opinion, and that if I continue to do so my account will get terminated, within 3 hours. Nothing of that sort comes even close on the Russian channels , not even remotely close. Even though I criticize them where it matters alot. And Russians actually do take criticism fine (when it's not just a blatant and w. lie designed with a certain purpose that is obvious to everyone...).
1
@Omega0850 I didn't understand what were you trying to say?
1
@mspicer3262 That price is not correct. The current T90M price for the Russian MOD is the 250 million rubles (for a brand new T90M), which is $2.7 mil USD however it's production price for Uralvagonzavod is about half of that. But it's export version is obviously going to get charged more though.
1
Nothing had changed except it produced most of it's weapons for itself now. Russia still has the biggest contract of arms exports to the world out of any country. 60 billion USD of contracts to be precise. And it's accumulating rapidly because most of the weapons Russia produces for itself atm.
1
@rustix3 did Mongols win?
1
@rustix3 So the Mongols are in Moscow now, if they'd won? Do you know where the Mongols are now?
1
@rustix3 Germany wanted more "libensraum" it didn't get it. So that argument doesn't work. Russia had won vs Mongols. They are no longer a threat and actually were pretty much aligned to Russia the whole time. Since about 14th century, give or take.
1
@rustix3 The original Mongol empire - second largest empire in the world was reduced to a small Mongolia which plays no role now in the worlds affairs, and was always allied to Russia after the yolk times. If that isn't counted as a win, then I don't know what is. The point is not an immediate win. The point is an overall - strategical win - long term. As Russia can lose tactically but has never lost strategically. Same thing they were saying about part of Kamchatka after WW1, except that Russia got everything and more back after the loss, but people prefer to concentrate on the first part, and not on the result in the end... Russia wouldn't have gotten that big if it was losing through time. It got that big - starting all the way back from Ladoga, precisely because it has won every single time - strategically, in the long term, including the Mongols. They didn't get what they were expecting at all, precisely because they lost.
1
@zoidburg3101 It's an open source information. Russia deals with it's arms exports through "Rosoboronexport". Look up it's total orders figure... it had surpassed 60 billion dollars just recently. The highest amount in history. And it would increase even more, if not for the infinitely long queues that countries have to wait for their deliveries... right now some countries are waiting 5 years in advance for their deliveries, nobody want's to wait even longer than that. But as long as Russia can jump start their military production with the help of an SMO. That future looks incredibly bright, and the demand for Russian arms is going to increase of out proportion after the SMO.
1
To be honest, the project does look legit. It just absolutely makes sense, and the US is capable ( in theory) of delivering a new gen jet (i. e. just get a YF23 program on steroids nad it can pass as a 6th gen jet). But, the only question is ofcourse it's cost and more importantly maintenance. So far it looks like they will have the moneyz for it for now... But if the Trump comes... Something tells me it might not get completed... with a cost of 300 to 500 million dollars per plane... It might be just easier for them to rely on advancing the old tech, like the F35 ( and even modernizing F22s)... If you modernize an F35A with modern avionics for 100 - 200 million, surprisingly it might end up being a better deal, than actually building a new gen jet...
1
No it's a completely different engine. That engine hasn't been used before in any of their vehicles.
1
All of the Su 30 series jet planes are modernized Soviet designs but were produced in modern day Russia. However Su 47, Su 57, S70, Su 75. Are all modern Russian designs, of which the Su 57 has officially entered service. The T14 is also new and it is officially entering service this year too. The T90 in it's original form was from the Soviet union, However the T90M is a completely new design, with a new turret and all of the extra features like the "hunter killer mode" which had never existed in Soviet Tanks. It is pretty much a completely new tank.
1
@Rehunauris every.
1
It has been used in Kharkov regions. That was confirmed.
1
What do you mean weren't much better. They were literally the same engine. The ones that they had already in their J20 planes.
1