Comments by "Kora Na" (@korana6308) on "Task & Purpose" channel.

  1.  @alican903  actually you do. There are plenty of designs, and it's especially apparent with it's backwing designs. I mean KAAN is clearly just a copy and there's no surprise there and nothing to really be ashamed of. It's just the way it is and no other ways it could have been done. Turkey has no experience in producing those planes. When you have no experience in building fighter jet planes, you have to start from something, your only option is to copy.
    19
  2.  @bandaarhibudaj5949  Он сказал про Душка. А не Дашка. Ты такая "душка". В значении прелестная. Но,как и сказал автор, никто никогда так в жизни не произносил название этого оружия, как Душка.
    12
  3. like what? can you give at least one example?
    6
  4.  @h.a.9880  not "before the rehearsal" 🤦‍♂.First of all, it didn't break, it malfunctioned, as it went to hand break by accident ( you can see in the video the attempted initial towing of it, it didn't move an inch because it was on a hand break by accident -unskilled crew on a brand new - new generation tank). Second of all it was a rehearsal of a parade, that was done on a different day as a rehearsal, parade was on a completely different day. So those two the rehearsal and the parade are not connected. And also it functioned just fine on the parade there were no hiccups on any of the parades prior or after that accident with any of the Armata T14 tank , and there were a few ( not just a single tank).
    5
  5.  @WDLC1911  are you an AI bot? in which case your response was not related to my question. You need a reboot and recalibration.
    5
  6. What a coincidence I was just researching this exact topic yesterday.
    4
  7.  @h.a.9880  Armata T14 got through its first parade just fine.
    4
  8.  @Error-33  the delusion is unsettling. Tell me what was the last jet plane of it's own design that turkey had produced? none. nada. zero. Also throwing shade at Su 57 - an actual 5th gen jet that exists (unlike turkey's KAAN). Was just the icing on the cake of delusion...
    2
  9.  @Error-33  can you stop with your delusion please. KAAN ( the one that flew) has F14/F15 engines (F110). It has only flown ONCE for 15 minutes. Without proving any of it's features, without it's landing gear even retracting into the chassis. Even if everything will go according to plan, at it's best, it's going to get released in 10 years time (though they don't even have an engine at this point...) but in 10 years time. Turkey might not even exist by then.
    2
  10. 4:04 That's not really fair to say that Russia didn't produce them in any significant number because China didn't produce them either. Those J20 planes are coming with Russian engines. Only recently China has been installing it's own engines. But so far it's fair to say that 3 countries are capable of producing 5th gen jet fighters. 1 USA, 2 Russia, 3 China.
    2
  11.  @FactCheckerGuy  NAFO trolls at its best. How much you get paid?
    2
  12.  @proy3  wow the amount of b. washing in the comments is astounding. Where did you get all of that from? Because the reality of things is the exact opposite. Russia had admitted many times to it's failures if something goes wrong it reports on it within reason. On the contrary when was the last time you've heard of a missile failure rate in the US? I am genuinely quite curious... But overall I must say, that is precisely why the west is losing in ukraine... because the general public along with politicians are b. washed pretty much with everything regarding Russia.
    1
  13. The amount of NAFO trolls in this comment section is beyond belief.
    1
  14.  @alican903  There were many designs of the first fighter jet stealth plane in the US. Like 20 different designs, you could make many different planes, something similar to Mig 144 (which was done in the chinese J20), something similar to F22, something similar to F35, similar to the Russian F57, something similar to Su 47 etc etc, there are plenty of designs, which look unique. It doesn't have to be a copy.
    1
  15.  @alican903  J20 is not a F22 copy far from it.
    1
  16. Thank you for at least trying to be neutral this time.
    1
  17.  @stuglife5514  can you stop spewing nonsense. Who is "she" anyway? Research the topic before replying to me again.
    1
  18. just another pathetic propagandist.
    1
  19.  @JohnDorian-j7x  IRST
    1
  20. There are so many things which are wrong with this design and they clearly don't work. However I respect the work that they put into it and at least tried... It's a nice try, but that tanks usefulness. Just by my rough guesstimate would be between a T72 and a T80 tank with a cheap diesel 1k hp engine and a modern looking armor. So it would still be good enough for the modern battlefield, but it's effectiveness is nothing to write home about.
    1
  21.  @avus-kw2f213  I am not denying that it's the best for North Korea. It is a new tank design after all with seemingly good features. Don't know about how domestically those modern equipment can be produced, I really doubt that. Just by looking at the tank, you can tell that it's not the best design, although I give them a pass for effort...
    1
  22. What do you mean by "failed air assault"? if it was a full succes.
    1