Comments by "Kora Na" (@korana6308) on "Military Summary" channel.

  1. "We've lost Kursk wanna ceasefire?"😂😂👍👍
    886
  2. Ukraine is doomed.
    222
  3. Saying that USA had won whilst Russia payed the highest price 27 million of it's people is pure disrespect by Trump.
    143
  4. I'm really impressed with the Russian modern technology, we've already seen Kinzhal missiles flying in a plasma cocoon , now 0:50 the satellite electronic warfare technology (I'm not even sure what's the name of it supposed to be). It is absolutely beyond of what I had ever imagined was previously possible. ✨
    96
  5. Great report. Ukranine keeps sending it's cannon fodder into Bachmut ,and even despite that they keep losing it continuously.
    83
  6. Holy cow, that is absolutely bizarre that it happened in real life, just like it's some kind of COD game, kinda cool and terrifying at the same time. I (just like Dima as well) also condemn any violence and I feel for that poor guy. But it's a war and a fair fight...
    74
  7. LOL " they will let Russia advance to the Dniper river "on purpose" yeah right!!! LOOL 😂😂
    73
  8. Dima got Sarmat statistics wrong. Every launch was a success. Except for this one. Western sources have been saying of 2 unsuccessful launches based on unconfirmed sources. In reality only 1 bad launch. p. s. Can Dima provide the dates of when he thinks 4 launches of Sarmat had gone wrong? besides this one? It would be easy to check each one of them.
    64
  9. It looks like the reality has caught up to Zelensky. He must've realized that he can't win or at least at this point in time. So he is feeding off his troops in Avdivka ( last town remaining of the defensive line since 2014), knowing that it would fall before March, so he would have a new defensive line prepared after that. The question is, does he have the resources in order to build that defensive line? Ukraine had 10 years to build the defensive line in Donbass, which was fully destroyed by Russia within 2 years. He now only has 3 months to build a much larger defensive line... No chance.
    59
  10. I wish more ukr. forces would just surrender. As those casualties are pointless, Zelensky regime is just using them as a cannon fodder, with no real purpose other than to delay the inevitable.
    58
  11. That's actually quite scary that they potentially will attack Transnistria - Pridnestrovje this month.
    51
  12. Because Russia is liberating people. That is the difference.
    50
  13. Glory to mother Russia💕 Russia will win💪💪
    49
  14. This is huge if true. Current market price of a Su 27 is around 30 million dollars. That's huge👍👍
    46
  15. 15:45 - that is one of the coolest things of the modern warfare that I've ever heard. Building a tunnel into the enemy trenches, blowing it up and storming out of it afterwards... Russian ingenuity with this conflict never ceases to amaze me...👍
    45
  16. $400k Himars rocket wasted on a $1k worth radar... Ukr. efficiency at it's best😂 Though why they did it is obvious, it means they couldn't get rid of it any other way, and it was important for them.
    44
  17. I reckon you could count Krynky in as well, because ukr. had some big plans for it as well. 4 elite brigades dedicated specifically for that mission were crushed by Russia.
    42
  18. That actually makes alot of sense. That Ukraine had used Turkey as a scapegoat to organize that tragedy in Crocus on their territory...
    37
  19. Dima never disappoints to misinterpret things, that's not Iskander that's Kinzhal at 0:39 - and holy cow, my jaw just dropped. That's a hyper sonic Russian missile striking that building. You can see it frame by frame, it strikes instantly (1 frame) and it leaves a tail of glowing molten plasma for about 3 frames ( 0.1 second). Kinzhal strikes at up to 12 mach or ~4 km per second...
    36
  20. Ukraine attacked Belgorod , which masked them as a "pro Russian battalion" this is nothing new.
    36
  21. "Russia is going to win." - Sun Tzu
    35
  22.  @DontWorryBeHappy75  I don't think that he cares enough about his life easier. I think Zelensky is a mad man at this point just like Hitler was. They will go down for good... but unfortunately bring many innocent lives down with them.
    34
  23. Poor Krynky bois. at least in Robotyne ukraine was able to capture some fields. But their attempted advancement in Krynky was a complete and utter failure.
    34
  24. Unfortunately even the Ukranians that want to surrender , most of them aren't allowed to do that, and get shot in the back... At least half of them that were trying to surrender got shot in the back by the Nazi battalions ( you can notice them by different flags at the back/ center of the front line, they are the ones that are instructed to shoot anyone who will try to flee or surrender.
    31
  25. You are speaking of the losses at a specific point , but there were days when Ukranians had lost "close to 2k personnel" in a single day. Also there were a few rocket hits in Nikolaev dislocation bases especially where a single rocket took out a few hundred troops before... So 470 is not the highest that Ukraine had ever lost, not even close. The average losses per day for Ukraine ( on all fronts) is around 600 to 700 men. That's straight KIA losses, and that's an average... sometimes more/ sometimes less.
    31
  26.  @franzkiefer9303  Doesn't have to capture it. It's a process of negotiations.
    30
  27. OMG SAME!!! I don't understand it either. Russia should be the first one they should be speaking to, not last. lol And everyone pretends like it's OK like it should be that way. That they have the moral right to decide what Russia should do and get a surprised pikachu face when they don't lol.
    29
  28. Not in my part of the country though. It's mostly the government who supports Ukraine.
    27
  29.  @louise_rose  and those numbers were already watered down. The truth is they had lost KIA around 400k but nobody in their right mind would be able to tell their people the truth.
    25
  30. I hope they don't attack you
    25
  31.  @ravencole2740  He promised to end it before he enters his term. Then changed it to 24 hours, 24 hours after he enters the office, now changed it to 100 days... or in other words, he is not here to end it.
    24
  32. Thank you Dima. Great video analysis as always.
    24
  33. Dima, why are you telling them how they should have done it better??? WTH? I condemn those suggestions. Their plan was simple... Within a few hours get to the territory of ukr. It has been reported that in 4 hours they were detained almost at the border. So they'd almost made it. Please do not tell them how they should have done it better. Like seriously wth DIMA???
    23
  34. I hope you get better Dima.
    20
  35.  @M0rshu.2  Prednidtrovia is Russian, Transnistria is English, but its the same thing
    20
  36. In a sense, yes. But that information is not hidden. It is all over the internet and there are plenty other analysts including on the ukranian side, who are doing the same thing, so there's nothing you can really do, except embrace it. The only redeeming factor in all of this is that information is delayed sometimes even by several days. So you are not receiving this information live, but rather what is available at the moment.
    19
  37. At least he did not say Cubicles 😂
    18
  38. Thanks for this great report, Dima.
    18
  39. Deny's is getting more desperate by the day😬
    18
  40.  @5150TJT  that's not true. Russia doesn't want to hunt him down, he is a perfect puppet for both parties. He was just recently at the front lines in Avdivka within like 5 km range. That's pretty much a firing range of every single artillery or a tank. Russia could have liquidated him long time ago many times over. But there's no intention to do so. And Russia would even go out of their way to not even hurt him. So I don't understand why Dima would say that it's his last day... it's not.
    18
  41. I don't know why Dima is making wrong predictions yet again (may be it's a deliberate misinformation?). As I have no idea what kind of "misinformation" he is speaking of before the SMO? As Russia had warned the West and ukraine that it would use the military force to resolve the situation, so there was no misinformation there and I don't understand where he is getting that from???
    18
  42. Drones are enough to destroy those tanks.
    18
  43. 1 Hovercrafts have no protection and are easy to damage. 2 Russia doesn't have that many of them, only like 5 ships 3 They are not good over land, their leather cushion wears off much faster on land. 4 Overall they are more suitable for water, and it's hard using them offroad, especially going over hills in between the fields 5 it would still trip mines off. 6 they consume lots of fuel. 7 it's not practical 8 they are expensive. etc
    18
  44. I mean, he was told that his mil. is the best. So escalate the conf. I guess is an option. So he needs to try it before he understand that he absolutely has no chance against Russia lol... Same thing with every other dictator that'd ever attacked Russia, they all thought that Russia is weak, and that they are superior... And to a certain degree, they were right, and were winning at the beginning... But Russia ended up pulling it off with it's resilience every single time... Same thing over and over... To a certain degree it's more powerful, then it engages Russia, and stops being powerful...
    16
  45. Those 500 used lancet drones are of all versions, and the first version of lancet wasn't as effective , according to the recent reports , the latest version of lancet drone had destroyed every single target.
    16
  46. Palestine is going to win this.
    16
  47.  @Durnyful  Not Kinzhal though. It strikes it's target at up to mach 12 speeds. It is shielded from surroundings by the hot plasma with thousands of degrees outside of that barrier. Yes we are living in the future, and Russia has the most advanced hyper sonic missiles in the world. Not everybody realizes that. The west was too busy downplaying Russia and it's achievements that something like that comes out as a surprise to many people.
    16
  48. NAFO bot detected
    16
  49. Yep. That was the main reason for liberating Avdivka.
    15
  50. That's a load of bs. 0 confirmations or videos of that.
    15
  51. The only time when Dima's short video is actually a short video👍
    15
  52.  @hiryu70  There's no doubt about that. The only question is who will be the scapegoat. Imo from what I'm hearing, probably Great Britain. People there seriously need to stay away 300 km away from their military bases. This is serious.
    14
  53. I did not get a notification for this video... Clearly they didn't want this video to be seen...
    14
  54. I agree. I don't know how I would have coped without Dima. There are other reporters but they are not as good as Dima. Even though he makes alot of exaggerations. ( i. e. oh they took this building which means that the whole village will get captured in 24 hours...🤦‍♂ etc.) But he is still the best in terms of an overall reporting on the conflict.
    13
  55. You can't quantify reliably anything else other than territorial gains. So ofcourse it would get and should get the most attention, as it's the only thing you can reliably track.
    13
  56. Dima no offense but it is so funny when you say something "will fall automatically"... not sure why or how you get those ideas from. Ukranian retreat from the eastern part of Avdiivka seems logical, because they have complications holding it there. So it is the most logical step that they might retreat from the eastern part, in order to concentrate their forces in the center of Avdiivka.
    13
  57. or fortunately... Ending this war prematurely i. e. now, is going to be a win for the west ( and ukraine) and a loss for Russia ( and it's allies)... I'm not going to say more...
    13
  58. Thanks Dima, Great analysis as always.
    12
  59. Zelensky was literally at the frontline in Avdivka like 3km away from the front lines. Even tanks and artillery could have taken him, but for some reason stopped shooting when he arrived. Because it's not in the interests of Russia destroying him rn.
    12
  60. Koalitsiya SV is like a mini T14 Armata. It has a 152mm artillery gun and is built on a T90 platform.
    12
  61. Not really. That would be the easiest thing to do, but precisely because Russia doesn't want to do it they are taking almost everything in a fair fight. For example, it would just be easier to erase Bakhmut for Russia , but for obvious reasons Russia doesn't want to do that. Yes, there are parts of the city which are completely destroyed, but just like in Mariupol, if you have at least some buildings, then it's easier to restore the city, than to start from a ground up.
    11
  62. Kinzhal rockets give you a guaranteed hit (impossible to shut down) but it's very expensive, I think like $5 mil. So you would only want to shut down a high priority target. What is a high priority target? an AA system that can shot down your cheap Shahed drones. Simple logic.
    11
  63. Slavic Brothers Should Unite
    11
  64. Honestly it is more likely that they will launch that offensive after the 20th of June. It is not about showing the result, he is being controlled by the Washington directly. So I see it as a general meeting before the offensive.
    11
  65. Well said.👍👍
    11
  66. I mean at this point just take it as your typical daily "required" level of hype. I feel like he thinks that it is required for the video to unnecessarily overpredicting things which turn out to be wrong, but people like that, they like hype like the F16s fighting with Su 75 next year... Which is incredibly hyper optimistic to say the least... so he gives them that. His daily reports are great though, just not the hype stuff.
    11
  67. Lets see... there first one, ended up in losing more territories than they had gained... wondering how's the second one gonna go.
    11
  68. What do you guys mean by collapsing? That is a very strong word for just taking a few fields. Perhaps you wanted to say "Russian advancements are faster than expected".
    10
  69. Same thing, except I am an NZ citizen.
    10
  70.  @Hasan-jf7by  not as much as Avdiivka. Avdiivka is the last town standing on the front lines since 2014 so it would be the most fortified town in Donbass right now. They have strategical defenses in Slovyansk also, and around that area, so that would be difficult too. Overall though the advancements are not as important for Russia, because Russian win solely depends on the western support of Ukraine, and nothing else. Same in Afghanistan, as soon as the US had pulled out, the regime had fell immediately in the same second. Same would happen to Ukraine. So it's better to wait for a political change of presidency in order to negotiate an NWO with a new leader and accept the western capitulation from Ukraine. By which point every other territory would come to Russia automatically. But obviously before that point happens the US wants to inflict the maximum amount of damage to Russia, until the very last moment, when it wouldn't be able to sustain it's debts anymore and would have to secede not just Ukraine but the whole of Europe to Russia. At which point it would only be a matter of time... so those territorial gains don't matter in the grand scheme of things, you can just take 'em with a grain of salt anyway.
    10
  71. Pretty sure Russians allowed them to land on purpose. Since there was nothing of value there. Just wanted to see the hell they were doing lol. Like that was absolutely pointless "operation" that served no purpose other than publicity stunt for Zelensky.
    10
  72. It's very easy to calculate Ukr. KIA losses. On average it is about 500 - 1000 soldiers a day (average of all days of the conflict), so take take the # of days of this military operation ,that would be the upper limit of ukr. losses in thousands, and divide it by 2 , that would be the bottom estimate of ukr. losses, and the actual number is somewhere between those 2 numbers.
    10
  73. As Dima had said it himself it is just a decoy attack to diverge your attention. That's the whole point of this attack.
    10
  74. Thanks Dima.
    10
  75. Honestly I don't think that is even possible to happen.
    10
  76.  @realSanti954  Ukraine could have shot it down with mortars though. That's the point , we really don't know. Either side could have done it be it Russia or Ukraine, either of them. But there's also an opinion online that it could have broken down by itself, because of it's tear and wear and no maintenance and higher than usual water levels. So it could really be anything.
    10
  77. ... why?
    10
  78. Yes, Prigozhin released some info on how many ukr. soldiers his group had liquidated. and it was like 90% of them were from Bakhmut.
    10
  79. 1933 Hitler becomes a dictator. 2023 Zelensky becomes a dictator. Interesting how history always repeats itself...
    10
  80. Perhaps tomorrow Bakhmut will be officially liberated? What do you guys think? There are only a few buildings left as far as I can tell??
    9
  81. Original plan according to the leaked papers was 1st of May , we will see how it goes.
    9
  82. Yes.
    9
  83. Russians are really smart. There 3 main parameters of a fighting vehicle. 1 Armor , 2 speed/ maneuverability, 3 firepower. Balancing those 3 aspects is the goal for any military in the world. And we've literally saw 2 maxed out designed in a span of 2 days. The so called turtle tank ( maximum armor) and now motor brigades ( max speed)... And it works to a great success.
    9
  84. Yeah this feels weird. He should return to his previous format.
    8
  85. 👍👍
    8
  86. They've been fortifying it since 2014 it is currently the most fortified position in the Donbass region, even more so than Bakhmut. But Bakhmut was obviously harder to take as you had to cross the river in the middle and there were less advancements on the left and right flanks... Perhaps it's about equal difficulty, all things considered.
    8
  87. Thanks for the update.
    8
  88. 5:50 to be honest, liberating the last part of Marinka would be hard... that last part looks like a modern castle with a moat.
    8
  89. That was one of the funniest sh. I've ever heard. Ukr. capturing it's own village at the border which had no Russian troops anyway. Just so that they could do a PR stunt hoping that no one would be able to notice. 😂🤦‍♂
    8
  90. I think that it's true that that vehicle didn't do any damage, because it was moving too slowly. One thing that it did though, is demined those trenches. That explosion can eradicated land mines in a 50 meters radius.
    8
  91. 5 mil is the total potential of the whole of Ukraine, But it's not going to happen , may be 1 or 2 at best... and not 5 or 4.
    8
  92. I don't understand why you are saying that it could be last hours of Zelensky? what's so different now aside from slightly higher barrage of missiles than before?
    8
  93. Russia is not our enemy ANZ
    8
  94. They said the same about Bakhmut. In reality it's not the end of the world for both sides. Dima likes to exaggerate things alot. It is however an important strategical point ofcourse and it is the most fortified position for Ukraine on Donbass since 2014, the front line hasn't moved there, and they've been preparing for this for almost 10 years. So losing it would be devastating, however it won't "collapse" the front, or won't change much at the fronts either. It would just stabilize the front lines, and Ukraine will lose it's strategical advantage there.
    8
  95. Thanks Dima as always. The best reporter on the conflict.
    8
  96. Because he is ideal for both sides. Both for Russia and the US he is the perfect puppet, and also a scapegoat at the right moment. To blame the loss on him, just like with Hitler.
    7
  97.  @GreatPolishWingedHussars  SU is Russia. Regardless of how you try to frame it Russia lost the most. America benefitted the most from it "business as usual" but it didn't do it. Russia had won it.
    7
  98. You still need to count the potential of a potential of mobilization, those that fled the country or living in other countries are also a potential of a potential alas most of them ofcourse won't fight for the Ukraine. So the mobilization potential should be counted from 50 mil. ppl. , out of those 11 mil are of the pension age, and say 8 mil or so underage. So around 30 mil people who in theory are capable of fighting , how many people are willing to fight for the Ukraine out of those, hard to tell, but in my opinion no more than 3 - 6 mil. at best. Which is 10% - 20% and no more than that (long to explain). And that is in my opinion is the limit, in reality I think that the total number will actually be around 2 mil. who they can gather to fight on the fields.
    7
  99. @ I wrote a similar message , but it got removed by yt. ffs.
    7
  100. 22:47 the most crucial information of this video. The Russians can put out more than 1k tanks per month. Russian victory is only a matter of time.
    7
  101. Sieversk and Ugledar hasn't fallen yet. Those are the last 2 fortresses left all the way from 2022.
    7
  102. Thanks Dima and friends.
    7
  103.  @Ragnovlod  My exact thoughts too. On top of that, there are Iskander strikes here on youtube, and they look nothing like that. I've never seen them flying through plasma, like Kinzhal does.
    7
  104. The reason for lower than usual losses is because ukr. offensive is coming to an end.
    7
  105. Marinka is not a priority, but yeah, Siverks is a hard target, so I don't think Russia will want to advance there as of now. But Avdivka has one of the strongest and most prepared ukranian batallions there, so it won't be soon. It will be a tense fight. Only time will tell how it all eventually goes.
    7
  106. where?
    7
  107. I mean technically, they can still do it, as they've announced an offensive and they could throw that offensive anywhere m including Backmut, but honestly not likely ( because of the concentration of forces there)... so yeah...
    7
  108. More like Achilles heel rather than a foothold 😂🙃🤭
    7
  109. Yep, and that's kinda normal. Everyone should just understand that it's a lowball offer, that's how negotiations start. Then Russia gives it's offer - full control of U. and... then by the process of negotiations they will meet somewhere in the middle. i. e. Russia will get much more than this proposed offer.
    6
  110. Now it's actually funny, because Avdievka is the same size as GAZA strip , yet something tells me it won't take much time for Russia to clear it... While I don't think that Israel will be able to clear the GAZA strip at all. Even if they level everything to ruins (which is what seems to be what they want to do) I am sure, they won't be able to capture it...
    6
  111. Tucker Carlson interview is going to be huge.
    6
  112.  @marvin902x  Yes and no. You don't need ammunition or anything, to just be a meat shield. You just need to be present there on the front line and be detectable from a drone or an infrared camera. Besides, it's not that hard to find a gun. The world is at a point where there are billions of guns... Depending on how your organize things and your logistics it could be as good or as bad as you want. But we know from the WW2 that a 10 mil. front is actually physically possible from the logistics side of things.
    6
  113.  @antyspi4466  Those numbers are based on the official reports at different parts of the front all summed up. And those are supposed confirmed KIA's. As there's supposedly much unconfirmed as well. So it's a good estimation number. Based on the daily reports that I keep track of.
    6
  114. paid trollo
    6
  115. 👍👍
    6
  116. Lol so true. This is so bizarre
    6
  117. 👍👍
    6
  118. I mean it's the extent of interpreting violence, you can't see any gore or blood in there. It's a low quality heat signature video.
    6
  119. Both sides have night visions, that's not a secret.
    6
  120. ZOV
    6
  121.  @maxmagnus777  I think you meant to say Donetsk, and Donetsk is being shelled mostly from Avdivka. It has the most priority, Marinka is second and not so important.
    6
  122. I didn't receive a notification for this video.
    6
  123. my comment got deleted by youtube again, but I keep receiving notifications. 😤😤
    6
  124. Territorial gains/liberation achieved: 01 - 01 - 22 ~ 25k sq. km. 01 - 01 - 23 ~ 110k sq. km. 01 - 01 - 24 ~ 125k sq. km.
    6
  125. I come for both
    6
  126. 20th of January is when Trump gets to power. 👍👍
    6
  127. Yeah, Dima hyping things up for no apparent reason. Literally nothing has changed, the same thing that has been going on for 2 months is going on now ( except for Prigozhin loss) there are no loss of morale ( or "spirit") and why would there be anyway? since Russia is grinding away Ukr. forces where they can't even reach the first line of defense? They had captured Robotyne which basically has a few houses in it and a pre war population of 400 people... That's literally nothing. The Ukr. offensive is an absolute failure you don't really need to boost anything as it speaks for itself.
    6
  128. my comment was rmvd
    6
  129. I don't think the river freezes completely.
    6
  130. I honestly don't know why they decided to change their name. Everyone knows them by Persia, they should have just kept the name. With it comes the heritage and recognition as well. Yet nowadays not that many people even know the difference between Iran and Iraq lol.
    6
  131. Yep I believe so too. It was the exact same thing in Mariupol. The estimations were jumping from like 25 to 5k and when everyone agreed that there were like 5k at the end, I remember people getting surprised that inside there Azovstal there were like twice as much as the originally anticipated, but within the original estimation.
    5
  132.  @manmin517  not really. Hamas is different. They've dug up tunnels in an old fashioned way, preparing for an inevitable IDF storming of the Gaza strip in advance. What was shown here is different. Russia had only got to that position recently and started to dig the tunnel for a specific task of breaking the fortified position of Avdiivka ( so it's not a penetrating tunnel, like on the border between the US and Mexico, but rather a break through the fortification kind of tunnel) . And as soon as the tunnel was dug, they blew it up and stormed out of it. This is similar to the medieval tactics of storming the castle, in medieval times. Except this time it was successfully used in a modern warfare. Nothing of that sort was every used by HAMAS or any Arab state for that matter. This is truly revolutionary.
    5
  133. Not "request" but require assistance.
    5
  134.  @nikoskn1252  nvm CoD always gets it wrong. lol
    5
  135. Stay strong my friend, you will get better👍👍
    5
  136. Nice , that's a really good news👍👍
    5
  137.  @olliefoxx7165  if all of your relatives lost people to it, some of the families were erradicated by the Nazi Germany. In Stalingrad , for example, there was a nonstop bombardment for a whole year with a total 100 000 tons dropped on the city. And that's just Stalingrad. In Voronezh battle, the 2nd Hungarian army 200k people , are now forever laying in the ground there. Russia had stood up, and had won the WW2. And the allies were not that eager helping it. And saying otherwise or bot understanding it, is one of the most offensive things to the Russians.
    5
  138. That's why they were killing them earlier , because they thought that they might surrender. Ukraine does not want their forces to surrender .
    5
  139. Yep. Somehow it didn't cross his mind that this offensive had a certain amount of troops prepared for it, and you can't really go outside of that limit. If I remember correctly it was 80k troops and Russia had chewed up through 80k troops in around 3 - 4 months. seems about right.
    5
  140. they want to make the same cauldron as in Robotyne. It's easier to liquidate their enemy that way.
    5
  141. Sometimes your comments gets deleted automatically even without anything that might be considered to be worthy of censoring by youtube. It happened twice to me yesterday. I had the original thread comment then the channel owner answers me. And I couldn't post a reply. Literally tried like 10 times. The message gets deleted even if I post something neutral " Thanks, it was helpful". Every message got deleted in that thread from me. Though, I did check that I can still leave a new message under those videos. But for some reason can't answer anyone... Pretty sure there's this soft core censoring. That if youtube decides. Half of your messages get deleted automatically if he deems your previous messages not following the pushed down agenda...
    5
  142.  @tolis7411  I mean it's all just a guess work. Nobody knows for sure. But the potential is there. Like in Germany in the 1945 there were like 70 mil. people, and a potential of like 30 mil. of mobilized personnel ( i. e. men fit for mil. service) , but nobody wanted to fight for Hitler, so he had to recruit children in his final stand... The mobilization factor depends on many factors, which are all hard to calculate and estimate, and it's never a linear number. In my opinion, the actual mobilization number that Ukraine can gather is 2 mil. people.
    5
  143. I mean with all the delays , it hasn't really started yet. Will see how it goes in the future.
    5
  144. I am fifth.
    5
  145. My exact thoughts. And more impressive is that it has been used successfully in a modern warfare... and we are watching it live. I plead to the Russian ingenuity .
    5
  146. yes. The question is, why wasn't he looking in the right direction. It means he thought that that direction was safe. So props to Russians. Either they outsmarted them or penetrated enemy trenches unnoticed, just to do that. I am absolutely astounded at the things we see in this conflict. I've almost seen everything here... it feels like a COD game.
    5
  147. That could also be a misinformation. alas they proposed a peace talk only if they came to the border of Crimea, but that will never happen as we know...
    5
  148. ZOV
    5
  149. ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
    5
  150. Let's be real, we don't have an alternative on youtube. And this is the best channel of daily reporting on the conflict. You ain't going nowhere...
    5
  151.  @bottlethrower1544  I'm sorry, but how is he right??? 6:33 he says that it will fall automatically? how?? it is literally connected to the forest where they in theory can have endless supplies... etc. Obviously they will lose everything eventually, but how does he make such bold claims with a straight face that it "will fall automatically". I just don't get it, and it's not the first time, he makes such statements in every video. He had also said the same thing about the "Terrikon" claiming it to be the most important height after which those northern positions "would fall automatically" and all I'm ever seeing is a slow and methodical advancements of the Russian troops. There are no "automatic falls" just slow and methodical work. As I'd said before Russia is going to win and it's going to take Avdiivka eventually, I just extremely dislike when I'm being fed bs with hype that it would just "fall automatically" like it's some kind of a weird PC strategy board or a card game, which automatically counters something if you pull a certain card. In the real world it is not like that... etc.
    5
  152. I must say, that the Russian mining game is really good, that they mined the exact way of the Ukr. advancements, as you can't mine the whole 1200km of frontline, you have to chose their most likely ways of advancements, and they got them exactly right. In some random part of a random field.
    5
  153.  @Arthur-rl1cj  Dima is an independent reviewer. He is not from Russia. He is from Belarus.
    5
  154. I must say that the amount of brigades and battalions in Bakhmut from the Ukranian side has increased drastically , you can see it on the map itself, I've counted at around 50 units of those at the Bakhmut area. Their exact size is controversial, but if there were a thousand troops in each one of those , then that would be 50k from the Ukranian side... What a meat grinder that Bakhmut is....
    5
  155.  @cesarbonnin  I'd say "an exaggerated" imaginations. He is however very helpful with his reports and when he doesn't give any predictions... as they are usually always wrong for him.
    4
  156. Great news my comrades, Russia is returning to Kiev.💕💕👍👍
    4
  157. my message got removed again, ffs. censoring left and right
    4
  158. I remember there were some troops that switched sides from Ukraine to Russia in the earlier days. But I've never heard of them since. May be they will finally bring them to the combat line? or may be they were fighting all along? just haven't declared or promoted it yet.
    4
  159. Thanks Dima, great reporting.
    4
  160. Lol that was on my mind like 10 or 20 years ago. They should divide the North between America and Russia in half. It would literally benefit the whole world. The combined exploration of the Northern region + unrestricted trade. That's what will surge the new world development into the new age. The whole world would benefit from it immensely. Not just USA and Russia. But obviously USA and Russia would get the most out of it. And to be honest... I think it's inevitable to happen.
    4
  161. He was peeing . You can see it by the heat signature of his warm pee.
    4
  162.  @militarysummary  it's already 9 pm Monday in NZ
    4
  163. IMO I actually think they should do it. Divide the Northern region between USA and Russia. The whole world would benefit from it. Though it would obviously have to restore it's relations first (lift all sanctions as a start etc etc etc), and then do an unrestricted trade policy. Make the Bering strait bridge give an unrestricted trade policy for the northern region of Russia/USA, make a Northern railroad from Norway through the north of Russia into the America and northen Canada (as of now). And it would boost the development of our human species and bring us into the new age of prosperity. With so much resources and an unrestricted development. It would be the fastest economic growth of the world, probably ever. Definitely more than 10 percent per year for the whole world, for many years to come... everyone would benefit from it - the whole world.
    4
  164. @johntowers1213 I don't really think micro nations of 5 million people really have any say tbh.
    4
  165. It doesn't matter which side you rotate this map to. Ukr. is going to lose.
    4
  166. My condolences to the victims of this attack.
    4
  167. Ursus - the mighty and legendary Russian bear can never be defeated 🐻👍👍
    4
  168. Literally like half a minute of a video and I am already blown off... LOl WHAT?!?! Satellite fallen from a sky!?!? WHAT!!?!?!
    4
  169. The drone attack that didn't injure anyone or didn't do any damage (broken some windows). Typical Ukranian attack...
    4
  170. It looks like Kinzhal to me.
    4
  171. Kinzhal strikes at up to 12 mach speed.
    4
  172. I Believe that starting date is a bit skewed. The main action was going on for about 4 months.
    4
  173. Can Shamans make shovels rain though? that is the question...
    4
  174. GonZalo Lira
    4
  175. I've watched an interview of this "free Russia" battalion commander like a month ago. Is a very telling interview that pretty much reveals everything. In reality (according to him) he was born in Russia but doesn't feel Russian and feel Ukranian. He doesn't want to associate himself with Russia, but just have some arbitrary goal of "freeing it" but doesn't want to live there. He argues for destruction of Russia... So make no mistake those "free Russia regiments" etc are there not to free Russia but to destroy it. They don't associate themselves with Russia and especially don't want to make it better. They are in the purest form or definition are just pure bandits and terrorists.
    4
  176. Zaluzhny himself has said that it would fall by the end of Feb or March.
    4
  177.  @Boyflair  That lessens the chances of them being encircled, that's the whole point. by retreating to the center they have more forces closer to the cauldron's neck, which in turn will make it easier for them to fend off Russian attempts on closing the cauldron. They won't give away their positions at the east that easily either, but obviously would lessen their resistance by much, which is exactly what we see in the video, with that Russian tank. That's just some basic logic. I like using my brain , sorry. May be it's just me.
    4
  178. We are at the brink of a WW3
    4
  179. Civil War inc
    3
  180. Thanks Dima, always the best reporting on the conflict.
    3
  181. Dima again making predictions which don't make much sense. Why does Russia need to go into an offensive now and capture some "important" village? WHY? It's a war of attrition. It doesn't make much sense for Russia to do anything now besides grinding away more of the ukr. forces while they are still on the offensive.
    3
  182.  @sosig6445  He was mentioning the first kill in particular. The first one was silent so that guys inside the trench wouldn't get alerted. On top of that, if they heard someone running outside, they would probably assume it's the original guy who was peeing, returning back.
    3
  183. Nothing will come out of it. Mark my words. I've been hearing great things about this upcoming ukraine offensive, like there will be thousands of drones at the same time, like they will get to the Azov sea etc. ... all of this is just a bunch of bs. That offensive will be a disaster for ukraine, mark my words.
    3
  184. Russians did not claim to be doing any advances now, it's the Ukraine that had claimed a start of an offensive over 2 months ago. Russia can make advances just like it did in the beginning of SMO, but doesn't want to to do it rn (grinding away Ukr. meat is more beneficial at this point).
    3
  185. I honestly don't think it is impossible to cover everything from Himars strikes. So you have to chose your areas of defenses. So you are obviously going to defend all of the main ones, but something like that of a small logistical hub, one of the many. Or in short, it's hard to cover everything.
    3
  186. No. Definitely not this summer. But it will happen eventually, no doubt about that. Next summers (2024) seems like it might happen, but it's also possible in the 2025... but it will happen eventually. Also Romania too will enter. And there's a potential for Baltic states too.
    3
  187. Why you up late?
    3
  188. A war isn't an official term. It's an SMO.
    3
  189. Yep. The only logical explanation is that they wanted to use it later. Planned for some sort of a set up. And obviously didnt want to just be standing in the open, in case it was taken out right away... either way logic was amiss here...
    3
  190. It is so weird that it's just like a real life PC game. Where an NPC is looking in the wrong direction.
    3
  191. Whatever you are smoking, I want some...
    3
  192. Can somebody please tell me then, what is the difference between Trump and the previous administration? He is literally reiterating the same thing that they were pushing and saying too that by "lowering oil prices they would destroy Russia"... Trump is literally continuing the same thing that the previous office was doing, and it's all bs. Russia doesn't care if the price of oil became 0 dollars it would not change anything for them.
    3
  193.  @KRDUC  yep i know that
    3
  194. @@potatogunman5428 Looks like those casualties were just accidental
    3
  195. He literally said that U. wasn't on an offensive when they literally were trying their best offensive yet with the best units in Kursk lol
    3
  196. Not 16 year olds. I believe they can be recruited from 18 years. Which means that they expect this war to last at least 2 years so that those 16 year olds could be recruited in 2 years.
    3
  197. @Kris P. Bacon Not really. You are thinking about it 2 dimensionally when in reality , the longer this conflict lasts the faster the west will fall. If you know that you are going to win in the end anyway(which Russia does) then it makes perfect sense to drag it as much as possible for your enemy to waste the most resources on it. For the US it's a proxy war, for Russia it's the war on it's border. So this war is very cheap for Russia and very expensive for the US. The longer it lasts the better it is for Russia. And when the west decides to eventually capitulate then Russia can declare an all out win , and the war will end that very same moment.
    3
  198.  @shadowbanned247  just type - bright flashin sky over Kiev , and you will see that video (no older than a days old). It comes down as blue flame from the sky.
    3
  199. That's dirty. Using women as motivators at the front. Trying to appeal to their masculinity so that they go and unalive themselves.
    3
  200.  @kleanthisxanthopoulos4697  Yeah, I agree with you. My estimates are also on the lower end, but I like round numbers, for easier comprehension of statistics, that's why I rounded it up that much. My actual estimation of Ukr. KIA's is around 300k give or take 50k. (could also be 250k, but definitely more than 200k). These numbers are not supposed to be exact, just a ballpark of the right number. Ty. for your message👍
    3
  201. Him saying that they don't have anyone in reserve is a lie. They do have reserves, as far as I know there are at least some brigades located in Odessa, probably more.
    3
  202. I like your videos but your analysis of the situation is wrong alot of the time. For example , there are manual check points between Crimea and Kherson oblast and Russia and Donetsk oblast, so it's obvious that there's gonna be a traffic jam at those check points it doesn't mean that the whole 500 km of the road is blocked though! That's just nonsense. etc. there are other examples too...
    3
  203. It should have been 2 month ago though... what are they waiting for?
    3
  204. kia
    3
  205. Dima I'm pretty sure that "white flag" was fake. They literally tried to fake it yesterday, so no wonder they would try to fake it today again.
    3
  206. You can't really have it on demand. People are fighting over here back and forth , I am surprised we get any footage at all at this point. As someone has to come back to the base to upload that footage. People don't realize it's a war, not a bloody tik tok contest. Be thankful we have anything at all at this point.
    3
  207. I mean it's all fun and games drawing bit arrow on the map left and right. But only time will tell the reality of things. Ofcourse Ukraine has the potential to dive in into Russian defenses if they do everything correctly. But to my expectation they won't be able almost anything at all. I mean we are 2 month past the date of when their offensive should have started. So to my understanding they've already been trying to breach Russian defenses in many places, and yet they failed. Ofcourse they can go with larger force on a suicide mission, but I don't expect anything substantial for them outside of it being a suicide missions and getting just some kind of village on the outskirts of the Russian defense and calling it a victory. And losing tens of thousands of soldiers in the process... But everyone forgets that Russia also has the potential... And it could be a counter offensive even more successful... only time will tell.
    3
  208. T90M is the best tank in the world.
    3
  209. All of the main defense of the modern tanks is at the front hull, So their weak spot is everything else, and especially hitting it from the bottom or the top.
    3
  210. 24 hours Dima , come on
    3
  211. They obviously wanted to do some sort of a set up. and retake the tank later if it wasn't taken down. But it obviously didnt work.
    3
  212. ahahaha they want to pretend like they left Kursk region because they wanted to and not because they were completely shut down. lol
    3
  213.  @donetski7324  Both names are technically Russian and were named under a Russian rule. Artemovsk is just a communist name, that was given under the Soviet rule.
    3
  214. 👍👍
    3
  215.  @krstestojanov6490  no
    3
  216. So many kiwis in here, that's noice👍
    3
  217.  @realSanti954  Yes, but just because it is mined up, doesn't mean that Russia blew those mines. Again an explosion from the rocket could have also triggered the mines etc. I am just saying we can't objectively know for sure at this point. Could have been anyone, I just don't like when either side presents it as 100% Russians or 100% Ukranians, and they both present evidence for both cases to justify their claims. And I take a neutral view on the matters, in the whole scheme of things it doesn't really matter if you think about it , so it's not really important.
    3
  218. 100% 👍👍
    3
  219. That's clearly not Su 34 . I don't know what Ukranians were smoking when they reported that.
    3
  220. I will never understand why you would ever leave an open hatch on your abandoned tank. Unless you want it to get destroyed. Perhaps they couldn't retrieve it?
    3
  221. Thanks Dima.
    3
  222. of the kind (an integral part of the word structure).
    3
  223. I don't think that it's possible to take Bachmut in 1 week. May be 2. But 3 weeks is the most probable.
    3
  224. 👍👍
    3
  225. I mean it doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things the map is not a live feed either way, it will catch up either way eventually if something substantial changes. So you should take any report not coming out of MOD with a grain of salt anyway.
    3
  226. The funny part in all of this is that Russia doesn't even want to get any gains at this point... This supposed "counter offensive" is extremely convenient for Russia... As they can grind the most of the ukr. forces now. And it would only make sense to do an offensive when ukr. offensive gets stalled. Even if it takes 2 years (which it won't), it would be still beneficial to just wait it out for Russia.
    3
  227. Literally got messages all of my 3 messages removed under this video. Like tf.
    3
  228.  @IvanToman  ehhh... It's too much to explain. Let's just say the world isn't as simple as you might wish it were.
    3
  229. 30k LOL Ukraine had lost 3 time that amount in the Robotyne foothold alone.
    3
  230.  @seanh4841  Lots of Kiwis in the comment section 🥝👍Auckland is not as bad as Welly I must say.
    3
  231. Every Opinion Matters. ✊
    3
  232.  @Daniel-vw7mw  Chechnya is not a country. There were Russian peacekeepers in Georgia which were brutally attacked by the Georgians (which was proven in a European court in 2020 if I'm not mistaken), Russia had declared DPR it's own states, and it was forced into this conflict because Ukraine wanted to ensue a geno. Also those 3 territories are rightful Russian territories, if you take the USSR territories in accords with the post WW2 Yalta accords of the post WW2 world. Which were breached only 30 years ago. That is in itself is the attack on the Russian sovereignty, as those territories were part of Russia for hundreds of years up until only 30 years ago, when the Soviet union was being dismembered. I personally don't care what the newly founded Republics gonna be doing now. But some context on the matters is absolutely relevant, that only the Soviet Union borders were breached and destroyed by the west. Why don't they let Scotland be Independent? or Ireland? or Wales? or Texas? or Hawai? or Alaska, etc why does it have to be Russia? and the west recognized those newly made border immediately? Have a thing about that.
    3
  233. 32:38 what is that sound in the background? right as you were speaking about disaster in Energodar
    2
  234. Isn't it obvious? That Bachmut occupies the most of Russia's time. That is where the most of fighting is happening right now. So if you don't care about your troops like Zelensky (and the ones who are controlling him), they are basically winning time before the counter offensive. They are throwing more troops ( and will keep doing that) just to win some more time.
    2
  235. RIP Gonzalo Lira
    2
  236. 14:55 Well hopefully Ear an will respond.
    2
  237.  @lepetitroquet9410  you've got some issues.
    2
  238. I don't think you understand this... They are just using them as the meat shield. And it is actually effective. No matter how good of a shooter you are , you only have 30 bullets in your mag, so you can only liquidate a few at a time... If I just keep throwing meat at you, even with no equipment, you will not be able to advance. at all , because you will be constantly needing to reload when the new portion of ukr. meat arrives.
    2
  239.  @cesarbonnin  what is he lying about?
    2
  240. What do you mean? Can you elaborate on that "elephant" that only you can see?
    2
  241.  @garethmartin6522  In my understanding it's an innovation. Sort of like if you were using iron cannon balls, or crossbows, and it turned out to be effective in the modern warfare as to break the enemy trench lines... you just simply wouldn't think to use it in a modern warfare, and it would have never crossed your mind in the first place. Yet somehow it turns out to be very effective... which is impressive. That's the whole point.
    2
  242. Because they are not sovereign, they been occupied by 'merica
    2
  243.  @seanh4841  mate I'm from the same side of the planet... you were up really late at 10pm
    2
  244.  @seanh4841  let me guess you also woke up just now lol
    2
  245. I wouldn't say that it has no effect, but definitely not as much as he is trying to hype that out to be.
    2
  246.  @KSmithwick1989  what are you on about? it was great.
    2
  247.  @KSmithwick1989  and his monologue was great. That's the point.
    2
  248. Russian military spending is not just going to be the highest since 1991 but I believe since WW2 days. As it is almost 1/3 of it's budget. And in the WW2 it was 2/3 of it's budget. And I don't think there was ever a time when it reached that level in the Soviet Union after the WW2. Cold war era, it was around %10 or even less than that.
    2
  249.  @fred4687  to my knowledge, they are just launching a bunch of new tech and ramping up production of things. So they do need that money, to actually produce all that stuff, or to be more precise, start those productions. Which require alot of initial investments.
    2
  250. So did Russia lose it's bases in Syria? I thought that there were reports of them striking a deal with the rebels?
    2
  251. And that is absolutely disgusting, what Ukraine and the west is doing mobilizing and utilizing pro Russian regions with Russian speaking population... absolutely disgusting and they are doing it on purpose.
    2
  252. I don't think there will be a surrender term. I think that ukraine will cease to exist.
    2
  253.  @JA-nq7xf  I would not agree. I mean again... it all depends on many factors... again it's all just a guess work. But I know from my situation, that I could definitely fight for one of the sides and I'm not living in Russia or Ukraine even though I was born there. But my family had immigrated a long time ago - 20 years ago. So potentially you could see me on the front lines ( in reality not possible for me at the moment). It all depends, but I can tell you for sure , that the potential is still there, so you need to take immigrants , that have immigrated to other countries, too. Not many will fight , but the potential is there. And that potential is higher , than just from a random stranger to those cultures or countries.
    2
  254.  @Doberman296  52 million was in 1991 , that was the number that was given when Bush was in Kiev in 1991. But by the official statistics that number was hit only in 1993. Regardless, Ukraine had started with 52 mil. people and now only around 22 mil left after 33 years... give or take...
    2
  255. 😂😂 IMO Dima is the best.
    2
  256. There's a video of it online already on youtube. That was actually really interesting. Doesn't look like a sattelite. it went STRAIGHT down to earth. And something that came out of orbit would come at an angle. So it was either a meteor ( which is really weird and you can consider at as a sign) or some testing (or sending messages) of the Russian technology.
    2
  257. Thank you Dima for your analysis. 👍👍
    2
  258.  @nunorodrigues3532  about 10 times less give or take. 500 days of conflict Ukr losses 500k - 250k KIA Rus losses ~50k KIA
    2
  259.  @Kenny-bj2zq  it's hard to calculate the exact number of wounded soldier because this conflict is not like any other. There are much more KIA's from the artillery and precision strike drones than before. My estimate of the wounded is ~ 2x of the KIA's so for 500 days of conflict between 500k and 1 mil. I've seen some people saying that it should be 3x or even 5x and even more... In reality this conflict is completely different to any other war or conflict in history we've had to date.
    2
  260. 👍👍
    2
  261. There's down sides and up sides to that. But honestly I don't see a problem with that , if that was said by the Wagner towards the Bakhmut regiments. As POWs are always hard to maintain and take care of, and ultimately it slows down your pushing speed drastically. Second point is that by leveling everything up like the US did in Mosul and Raqqa. By saying that you don't take any prisoners then you are basically allowing yourself to level everything up in the remainder of the city... And there will be no questions raised seeing that you didn't get any prisoners from your usual average of 10% - 20 % at the current rate.
    2
  262.  @thedreadtyger  That GPD doesn't matter. It is bloated. Basically a legalized pyramid scheme. i. e. like Tesla worth more than the rest automotive industry combined... What it basically means is that it's a non liquid unreleased assets of the future - i. e. promises. i. e. a legalized pyramid scheme. The real GDP would be like several times less of each state and the US as a whole, when the s. hits the fan. But your point still stands in regards that more powerful nations, with more people, and large territories, ultimately have more value and power over every other country in the world.
    2
  263. @johntowers1213 it would not throw it into anything. The EU and NATO is the US bi. that was created by USA and they could destroy it or move it in any directions that they like (which they are doing atm already).
    2
  264.  @nudisco7882  which means never
    2
  265. I never understood Dima's predictions. 7:07 why do they need to create a barrier and secure zone in Marinka, but not in Bakhmut for example? No, they don't "need" to do that, in fact it would be counter intuitive to do that, unless they are planning on advancing there further soon.
    2
  266. There are not enough GoPros cameras on the battlefield as it's a known problem, and not a priority for the Russian troops. And all of the official information through the MOD has to go through many layers of authorization. Considering it's an ongoing battle, and people constantly fighting back and forth I am even surprised that we have any footage at all at this point.
    2
  267. Because they are not sovereign. When you are not sovereign you tend to do things which are not in your interests...
    2
  268. Same thing. It's sad to see people dying from both sides. But distancing yourself from it helps alot, as there's nothing we can do. But trying to accept it as it is, and laugh at some silly Ukranian tactics. p. s. Russia is going to win in the end Z
    2
  269. Lol Dima come on... What about the Kursk region offensive? Was that part of the "defense"? Come on Dima.
    2
  270. Ukr. has no chance at this point. Aerial missile that can destroy bridges and hit 500 km, which can't be shut down... It's a field day for the Russians.
    2
  271. I feel like we should also start exporting our wine to Russia too.
    2
  272. it's practically already had fallen
    2
  273. Imo were they actually impersonating them? That is actually kind of epic if that's true.
    2
  274.  @dr-weeb  Great calculation, 6.4 billion joules of energy seems about the same strength as a FAB 3000 ( if I'm not mistaken/ ~1.5 tons of TNT). Looks exactly like that.
    2
  275. Personally I don't really get all this drama with Zaluzny , it really doesn't matter if he is alive or not. Who cares? Ukraine is being controlled directly by the Washington, so it really doesn't matter which puppet they put in the place of Zaluzny or Zelenski.
    2
  276. It is not in the interests of Russia to overthrow him. And USA probably wouldn't want to do it as well. It is in the interests of London and the EU. So they might stage a coup.
    2
  277. It's not a question of the amount of forces per se. People forget that it's not all about just forces. As if it's a war of attrition, then as soon as the west pulls out of it (Ukraine is almost 100% exist because of the western support), then the war will end almost immediately. So it's not a question of grinding away all of the Ukr. forces by Russia, but rather grinding away the most thick headed nazi ukros and the rest will be denazified automatically, when Russia strikes a deal with the west to pull out of ukr.
    2
  278. their whole keeping up is solely due to the western support. Just like in Afghanistan Zelensky regime would not last a single day as soon as the west pulls out. But while the west is controlling it, only then there's a status quo which keeps his regime alive.
    2
  279. Goes up to 6 mach or 2100 m/s, but this is not Iskander that's Kinzhal which has twice as much speed 12 mach or 4 km/h. Also Iskander if I'm not mistaken has a much lower speed in it's normal series version, and 6 mach has only a specifically modified version ( if I am not mistaken).
    2
  280. I've heard about 20k. That seems like their go to operational reserves at the besieged city or a town. If I remember correctly similar thing was in Bakhmut and Mariupol. Around 20k inside the town, and all of the other reserves were outside...
    2
  281. 👍👍
    2
  282. RrOaRrrr
    2
  283. Yes. Transnistria is part of their plan. I know that because 99% of my comments about it are removed. So it is obvious to me that something is coming...
    2
  284. I'm a Russian girl, do you want to date meh?
    2
  285.  @corvus4135  I just want a sugar daddy
    2
  286. Yeah, that's the most cruel thing that Zelensky regime is doing at this point. And just to clarify, this is not some volunteer battalion, women are now being officially conscripted in the Ukranian army. So he is doing it deliberately getting rid of the entire Ukranian population.
    2
  287. They've already deployed troops there it's not news to anyone. The point is that, if you don't declare your deployment officially, then it doesn't count as deployment.
    2
  288. Zelensky is losing and the west is desperate. That's why they are trying to negotiate with Trump now. It's a sign of things going not in their favor, a sign of desperation.
    2
  289. Yeah . Nothing we can do though. It's not like we are taking part in the fighting , so might as well discuss it and laugh at some silly Ukr. tactics.
    2
  290. That was not "one of the strongest" it was the strongest point of the frontline.
    2
  291. We've all been waiting for this promised ukranian offensive for so long . I mean come on. It's been 2 months already of the promised offensive...
    2
  292. It's just a guess work at this point.
    2
  293.  @jeffrey6611  Yes, I've been talking about SC universe references to the current conflict for a long time. Mengsk represents the central powers, and Jim Raynor is the rebel, just like DPR and LPR people were, just the rebels to the central power. And obviously Jim Raynor wins in the end ...
    2
  294.  @jeffrey6611  Well in the whole scheme of things the US empire will probably stay too. But I was referring to the whole conflict of the Rebels vs the Dominion ( The US and it's satellites) fight. Which seemed like an impossible fight for them, but at the end of the WoL Raynor saves Sarah and kills Mengsk's servant which was pretending to be Jim's friend (just like Ukraine did) Tychus Findlay, and saves the Day. I look at Tychus Findlay as current day Ukraine pretending to be "friends" all that time. And in the end uttering those iconic words " I've made a deal with the devil Jimmy , she dies , I go free..." he had made his choice and that is why Jim Raynor kills him. As Ukraine had basically sold it's soul to the west just like Tychus Findlay did to the Dominion, he got promised "freedom" for killing Sarah (Russia) ... Something like that...
    2
  295. Good point.👍👍
    2
  296. 1:13 That's actually pretty smart. Russia is testing Polands capability of detection and potential striking back and their reaction of a missile over their heads of the Polish government. The games are over, Poland has to chose the side at this point. Otherwise the west is going to throw it into the meatgrinder next.
    2
  297. It's winter right now in Russia, how can flowers bloom in the winter?
    2
  298.  @club4ghz  can you give an example?
    2
  299. It won't happen. As much as they are fools , they are not suicidal
    2
  300. Yeah it kinda sucks, but I guess we will never get rid of wars, that's the nature of human race... So might as well just embrace it.
    2
  301. I don't know about you , but that doesn't look like "a regular agricultural tractor" it looks like a tank to me. I am not an expert though , but even if they made that mistake , I wouldn't blame 'em cuz it does look exactly like a tank, and assuming it was at the combat line may be Ukr. masked it to look like a tank on purpose.
    2
  302. Russia liberated Marinka already? Seems too good to be true honestly...
    2
  303. Thanks Dima.
    2
  304.  @RustedCroaker  yeah, he will drain the swamp... and to be honest I don't understand how they would allow him. I totally expect at least 1 more attempt on him... "oh sorry, we didn't notice that guy with a bazooka on his shoulder..." LOL
    2
  305. It is the best decision for Russia though. I don't know who told them to do that... clearly orchestrated by someone outside... but now Russia has the official declaration of an military force inside their officially recognized Russian borders... Which by it's own military doctrine allows them to use any amount of force and any kind of weapons (including n, u, kes). Russia is no more bound by the SMO treaties and rules. It is officially can now do whatever it wants... including (but not restricted to) forming official international alliances and sides (like in the WW2)... Something tells me it's gonna get real spicy real soon... And all of that was technically allowed by the U. and their pupp, e, teers that allowed them to enter official Russia. LOL.
    2
  306. 2022 - Russian offensive = 120 000 sq. km 2023 - Ukr. offensive = 12 sq. km
    2
  307. Congratz everyone. Congratz to Russia and the Wagner group, really well done👍👍
    2
  308.  @justsilas37  😂😂
    1
  309. Welcome aboard friend
    1
  310. You are not understand this mate. There was no battle for Kherson, like there was a battle for Bakhmut. The decision of leaving Kherson was from the higher ups in command. It is simply was very difficult defending it, draining more than ample resources and putting yourself at a disadvantage. The same reason why Ukraine hasn't crossed the river yet, Russia had left Kherson, it's the exact same reason!!! Is because fighting on the other side of the river( when your troops and supplies are on the opposite side) is hard , and it put's you at a disadvantage. If there are no immediate goals there , then you would just be wasting resources and creating problems for yourself for no apparent reason.
    1
  311.  @lepetitroquet9410  Nobody is saying that there weren't any fights on the outskirts. That's the point of a war , you always have fights of different intensity. The point is that there were no Ukranian troops coming into the city and fighting for each building , like in Bakhmut , there was nothing like that. Also it's not about being cowards or not, it's the front line that's constantly moving back and forth. There's nothing cowardly about following your orders from the higher ups in command. As I said, Russian troops didn't run from the combat line , it was an ORDER from the higher ups to leave the city. And those higher ups took the decision of leaving Kherson NOT because they couldn't hold it, but because holding it would be hard and would be even harder in the future, and there was no strategical interest holding it. Imagine that Kakhovka Dam breaking earlier while Russians were there. Then the whole situation of supplying your forces in Kherson becomes that much more difficult. and for what? they would be fully surrounded forces in Kherson that would be getting constantly shelled at at all times, it was obviously unreasonable to be staying in Kherson at that point. And again Russia could have held Kherson, it was just a question of why and at what cost? And the cost of holding back Kherson would be something like 10 to 100 times more compared to just leaving it and moving to the other side of the river. So it was the right decision to make.
    1
  312.  @truespirit  you are a ukr. shill I hope you are at least taking money for your shilling , wasting everyones time.
    1
  313. Yep. This is pretty much their name for sponsors. They don't associate themselves with Russia. Nobody of them wants to live in Russia. They basically argue for destruction of it. But how do you get funding from the west? You have to name your battalion that way. And you will get funding. That's the whole purpose.
    1
  314.  @SanarySeggnete  No you guys are missing the point. I'm talking specifically with regards to the MODERN warfare. By modern I mean in the past 80 years or so. You have to consider the age of aviation and tanks and modern guns and weaponry which had started in the 1930s The modern type of warfare which has never been seen previously before by the humankind. From that point onwards, after invention of the motorized brigades, tanks, aviation, modern munition and howitzers and automatic assault rifles etc etc etc. The tactic of digging up a tunnel like in the medieval ages was in question. Russia had just proved it now that it is indeed possible and it is indeed effective. Or at least I don't know any other examples of the modern warfare which had worked the same way. It was not even considered in the doctrine of modern warfare as a possibility, hence why it was so effective at Avdiivka for Russia which basically had invented that tactic in the modern warfare ( or basically reinvented it effectively).
    1
  315.  @jamessmithers4456  WW1 wasn't really a modern warfare. Modern warfare is around 1930s - 1940s that's modern warfare. In the 1940s you got the modern type tanks, you get your first jet planes, nuclear warfare, AK 47 etc etc etc. That's modern warfare. WW1 can't really be considered a modern warfare. WW2 was on the brink of the modern warfare. But which battle did you have in mind? just for the reference?
    1
  316.  @darthoblivion2615  lol that is where you are wrong. Ukraine was always out of ammunition... however it gets all of it's ammunition and shells from the west. So it doesn't matter how much ammunition Ukraine has, as it will always get more from the west. So ammunition is not the problem here. After the Ukranian offensive they will just lose some of the territories... But it's not going to change much... the west is not going to stop supporting Ukraine ,at least not until the Trump administration takes office. And that is not going to happen soon. Though it might happen next year... Also it's not correct to say that Ukraine can't last long because , because it's not the Ukraine that is fighting ( Ukraine just provides it's meat for the meat grinder) but the west. We have the west vs Russia war and it's going to solely depend on the wellbeing of the west , which is ofcourse is slowly crumbling under it's own weight. But it's not going to be over soon, not this year , that's for sure... The Russia can hold this conflict indefinitely but only if it keeps going like that. I believe if the west will raise the stakes higher i. e. add Poland and Romania into the mix, then Russia will have to mobilize the whole army 1 to 2 mil people, and at that rate , I don't know how long for sure, but it wouldn't be able to last forever, though the west might not have the resources for that kind of scale of war either , so this conflict might have found an equilibrium... but if the west decides to go all in, then it will probably collapse faster than it can do any substantial damage to Russia. So I'm not entirely sure what the western plan is here, because it loses in the end either way, but I have a feeling that they might try going all in.
    1
  317.  @peterlangan1181  Nobody will ask them if they will get crushed or not crushed. Europe is not sovereign , so they will do whatever the US says them to do. They are not tiny combined it is more than 60 mil people. Which is at least a double of Ukraine. Ukraine will not fall this year. Please stop dreaming and comeback to the real world. The Dems will never give up their last hope and a golden opportunity they are connected to Rot... child and S... ros . So they will not waste their opportunity to continue attack Russia , no matter the costs... This year is definitely not going to be the last one. They might initiate a peace talks , and try to do a peace deal next year because if it's not them , then the Trumps administration will do it not under their terms... But they don't need to end the conflict before that. And that is how you can tell that it will still be going on this year ( no matter the losses or the situation on the battlefield as a whole).
    1
  318. My condolences to all of the victims of this terrorist attack.
    1
  319. It has been updated over the ears. It is as modern as it gets, except for the stealth.
    1
  320. You have to understand that all of this rhetoric is coming directly and only because Ze. promised all of his natural resources to the Americans for free (which is kinda smart ngl). So I feel that it kinda worked with Trump, instead of ending it he now wants the resources... So the confrontation at least in the meantime is only going to rise, and he can justify it for fighting for resources for America.
    1
  321.  @eturner4940  Where's your promised offensive mate? oh wait you've been trying it for the past 2 months. And nothing has worked out. What makes you think it will work out in the future? delusional.
    1
  322. Yeah I agree with you. May be it was just a bait for more comments from him? who knows...
    1
  323. Google is trying to cover their own crimes of the d. state. They know they are guilty af.
    1
  324. February 21.
    1
  325.  @markbryant4641  You can't send links on youtube unfortunately.
    1
  326. Azov has different branched out battalions they are in alot of places.
    1
  327. different weapons require different AA defenses. Also the majority were shot down. Only 1 got hit to my understanding.
    1
  328. I think it has been recently disproven that they took anything there. It is mostly just a media warfare... Where you don't have to have any wins on the battlefield, but can massively guide the media towards an illusory win, in order to bitter sweet losses of the Bakhmut city. That by the way, has also happened inside the Bakhmut itself where Ukranians claimed some territories inside the city which they had already lost. But the media made it look like they did. Only time will tell the whole picture, but as of now, don't forget that you are in the midst of the media warfare, and some information is deliberately spread to misinform you for one or the other reason.
    1
  329. lol Ze. is approved by only 4% of his people. That is the LOWEST rating of a president in history. And is the definition of a dictator. ☝
    1
  330. They have more privilege than the rest of the world.
    1
  331. This is just minor readjustments on the front. Nothing major. They might even lose all their progress of their offensive. But it won't change much.
    1
  332. I didn't get this video in my feed.
    1
  333. 👍👍
    1
  334.  @GreatPolishWingedHussars  Open up the world map of the 1914, with internationally recognized borders. And look up of that thing called "Russia".
    1
  335. 2 thousand tanks, which means that it's even more in 1 year than the Oryx reports of the Russian tank losses of the whole SMO. That is even if all of those supposed tank losses are correct.
    1
  336. I didn't get this video in my feed.
    1
  337.  @cyfangz9238  THAT'S NOT ODD!!! Strop trying to give them suggestions. You are literally trying to do all the brain work for them. In my opinion that should be punishable as a crime. Trying to suggest a better route for t. equates you to them. Second of all, it's not better. Their plan was quite simple. 30 minutes on their operations and whilst the place is in flames within 4 hours leave Russia through the border of ukr. in the middle of the night. Doing it as Dima had suggested is much more difficult which would involve more connections through their operators and curators. Which is much more risky! But trying to wing it is much more plausible and easier, and they've almost made it. They've made it 350 km away from the Crocus city hall, and got caught 100 km away from the border of ukr. 100 km is 1 hr drive. If not for the Russian operative spec. ops. they would have gotten away.
    1
  338.  @thehturt5480  in 1991
    1
  339.  @johanrebel9252  Ukraine had 52 mil. ppl that's the official number, at the time of the Soviet Union dissolution. Although I would agree with the rest of what you've said. Their government was selling to them "the European dream" for Ukranians to migrate to Europe and "live rich like a European" so ofcourse the majority of the younger population had left to Europe (and the other half had left to Russia) . But with regards to how many they can gather troops on the battlefield. It honestly depends on many factors. But as far as I understand, this conflict is unlike anything else we've ever seen in history. Where Ukraine is almost 100% is being funded by the west. The floodgate of money is endless. The total amount of "help" was over $150 bil (most of it is weapons and mil. help) which is more than a Ukranian GDP ( which is estimated to be at around $132 bil. 2022)... So you have to look at it from a different angle, the west is saying - we will give you anything - ANYTHING, any amount of money and weapons and political support, as long as you are fighting Russia , so the potential of how many soldiers they can feed and arm is solely relies not on the Ukraine , but on the west as a whole... And as long as it doesn't collapse soon (which it's already slowly doing), the west will always support Ukraine for a proxy WW3 with Russia. There will never be another chance to fight Russia directly on the battlefield, as with this golden opportunity for the west, so I believe that the west will give and try everything here... Going as far as throwing Poland and Romania into the furnace , as long as they can support the conflict even at their own detriment ( look at the France protests, against the pension reforms etc). So the amount of troops is limited not by the money or supplies, but by the amount of people are who willing to go on the battlefield and fight. And that number can be as low or as big as you'd like, just too many factors to consider. But as I've said, according to my estimation , up to 6 mil people, not more... That is only if the Ukraine remains at war, but if Poland and Romania joins that number can double or triple. But that is again only a potential... in reality I don't think they will gather more than 2 mil, or 6 mil if other European countries join.
    1
  340. The Russians are not low on ammo, according to some sources they are just preparing for a counteroffensive, so they are stockpiling their shells.
    1
  341. Where are you getting these supposed 2 weeks to restore electricity for Ukraine? Dima are you dreaming? restoring a powerplant would take you 5 years. Restoring an electricity substation would take you at least a few months. Russia could blackout Ukraine any moment, and Ukraine won't be able to recover, as simple as that. They would just have to be using diesel generators, which you would need alot of fuel for that and alot of diesel generators... which would be a nightmare , and it would be impossible to restore everything... not in 2 weeks thats for sure.
    1
  342. @Kris P. Bacon Yes. The enemy always adapts. So why do you consider enemy only from one side? For each side the enemy is the opposing side. And everyone adapts. Russia is adapting much faster and it's much easier for Russia to adapt than for the west. Russia is losing the bare minimum of troops, nothing compare to a much worse potential outcome if it stops everything now, postponing the war for a much worse outcome with more casualties . Russia is losing around 30k troops a year (give or take) , yet it's total death tall for any reason is around 2 mil. people (for the whole country) per year, which is just over 1% of all deaths (also around the same # of newborn babies), that is nothing compared to the whole number of deceased people for any reason in Russia. That level of conflict Russia can sustain an indefinite amount of time (without it affecting Russia) unlike for the west, which can not. Give yourself some time and study the situation as if it was a project for high school advanced class credit.
    1
  343. 🤣🤣
    1
  344. It doesn't affect Russia much whether he loses or wins. He was the toughest on Russia. Regardless of the president, America is ready to give part of U. to Russia, both reps and dems agree on that. Now we didn't hear any escalatory rhetoric from the Dems it would just be same old support with at best more weapons. But with Trump, according to him, he is ready for some radical solutions. If Russia wouldn't agree to his conditions. From the Russian point of view it wants an unconditional surrender of wests support to U. ( so it would be overrun within 3 days if the west stopped supporting it). But the west doesn't want to stop because it deals great damage and will continue doing so ( from their perspective) in the long run to Russia. So both parties don't want to surrender completely. And from the Russian point of view, that is unacceptable.
    1
  345. 👌👌👍👍
    1
  346.  @Ragnovlod  yeah, yeah right... except I know exactly what you are talking about... and I don't get notifications from most of my subscribed channels ( for obvious reasons, because they don't follow the general agenda). However this channel I was getting a notification for every single video. Hence why this channel was different. I even got used to it, because I got it on a daily basis and that is the only channel that I get daily notifications from in my feed... except this time I didn't get it... Let me guess... there was a "stop word" in there... That prevented it from poppin' up in my feed...
    1
  347. I mean he creates hype. And I guess that's good for the channel?
    1
  348. Thank you Dima. The only real bad offensives were in Belohorevka and Uhledar, from the Russian side. So I would imagine, that general was responsible for one of those directions. As I don't remember any other bad offensives with huge losses for the Russians. (aside from Bakhmut with Prigozhin, but he took the most fortified town in Donbass, so that doesn't really count).
    1
  349.  @edvsilas8281  Gotto buy me those sturdy Russian shovels ))
    1
  350. Both UK and Uk won't exist in 100 years.
    1
  351.  @Slowv8Fiero  Those are the fortresses that were hard to crack. There are still commander fortresses in Slavyansk and around that Russia hasn't even touched. So we don't know how tough they are, but they supposed to be the toughest.
    1
  352.  @Well....1234  not from 2014 but from 2022. I literally remember those names from those years in my memory. Of Russia trying to take them and later getting the reports of something not going right there... several times. and also the U. was boasting them themselves of how good they are there, precisely in those 2 locations. So taking them is gonna be like overcoming a large obstacle for Russia.
    1
  353.  @Slowv8Fiero  I know I'm talking in terms of the actual toughest, that Russia'd struggled with. Ugledar and Sieversk. As it was trying to take it since 2022 but couldn't.
    1
  354.  @yohatch  yes, that's what I've said overall. Ugledar and Sieversk are the most immediate ones. Something that could be potentially taken soon. Slovyansk etc is the last main fortress. Not gonna be taken any time soon.
    1
  355.  @Robson-2  I mean info warfare takes resources and time, and as far as I understand ,they are busy defending "the most incredible offence of all time" as the Ukranians themselves had put it. To be honest, I haven't been on Telegram for a long time, I bet there are much more videos there...
    1
  356.  @adamesd3699  i. di. ot 125k KIA
    1
  357. Honestly could go either way. No reason to be trying to guess now, but I must say, from the way it is going it looks like another 3 months. They might want to take it exactly 2 years into the conflict.
    1
  358.  @willtroy1986  Mate then do something about it mate. Why are you writing about it in the comments then. What an absolute hypo crit.
    1
  359. Can I?
    1
  360. Some of them were born in Russia. But they've moved to ukr. long time ago. And they don't associate themselves with Russia anymore. They basically argue for destruction of Russia.
    1
  361. I didn't get this video in my feed for some reason.
    1
  362. Russia just wanted the Crimea not Donbass. When they didn't agree it was clear to Putin that they had to liberate Russian people from the oppression.
    1
  363. Yes. And it is famous of Poroshenko PR team when they renamed it back to New York a few years back.
    1
  364. 1 Russian warrior is equivalent to 10 Ukrops
    1
  365.  @MistiDonaldo  it's not even if it would do the same or worse. Everything is going according to plan. Everyone who want's to fight Russia is being liquidated right now, as gruesome as it sounds. Zelensky created a perfect funnel for a meat grinder of the enemies of the Russian state. This is exactly what Russia want's. After which only the pro Russian people will survive. Also keeping this conflict afloat is draining the west from it's money. Ukraine is a perfect trap for the west. No reason disrupting it by liquidating Zelensky and disturbing the perfect strategical equilibrium at this point.
    1
  366. @Manticoruss He was at least at the entrance of the Avdivka city.
    1
  367.  @necsoiub  They created a law by which it is not allowed for him to make talks with Russia. So their government went all in. Everyone is fine with Zelenski.
    1
  368. ZOV
    1
  369. If they've lost 80k soldiers in 4 months... That means that for the whole year that will equate to 320k ukr. soldiers KIA .
    1
  370. If you actually count all of their mobilized waves it's actually stacks up to more than a million troops... The losses are absolutely devastating.
    1
  371.  @virgiliustancu9293  They didn't get hit by an aerial drone though. It was a land one. So something tells me they had aerial drones covered.
    1
  372. Good point👍👍
    1
  373. Yes. Usually it's in that numbers. 30 - 50. Unless specified.
    1
  374. If Russia didn't strike before of the conscript exchange that actually is a very sensible reason. Yet it shows "weakness" to Russia. But it shows that Putin will do anything to get innocent Russian conscripts out of Zelensky hands. And that reason is quite sensible.
    1
  375. Yes, for every day there's a Surprise, because there's always something memorable to celebrate each day...
    1
  376. Yep 100%. This is actually too funny imo.
    1
  377. You must be new here. As that's a general rule on Dima's channel. You have to filter everything that he says, in order to stay objective. It is one of the reason why his channel got so big. Because he hypes alot. Pretty much almost every prediction that he gave, the exact opposite happened, so you just have to be ready for that. And when he gets too many predictions in a row wrong, he usually slows down, and stops making wild predictions, so it's a good thing. His videos are still good for the daily reportings. He is the best at that. And usually some news at the end of the videos... Just have to filter through the layers of hype that he sprinkles with each video. Treat it as something like a wild fantasy, necessary for viewer retentionship.
    1
  378. There are half a million of people in Transnistria, you can't just let them take it.
    1
  379. Hp ny every1. 🎈🎈❤❤👍👍🤝🤝
    1
  380.  @dapro2524  No aid was stopped it was just a fluke.
    1
  381. I didnt get this video in my feed.
    1
  382. Globalists want to dissolute Germany now, and it seems like there's nothing that can be done to reverse that. The western block wanted to do it after the WW2 ,but Stalin had famously said " Hitlers can come and go but the German folk will remain", so he wanted to preserve Germany albeit separated into two occupation zones Western and Eastern Germany. And the west eventually agreed to that scenario. This time it seems to me that nobody wants a united Germany anymore, and we will see a resurrection of Prussia, Bavaria, Saxony etc. As a separate European countries ( just like what they did to the Soviet Union). To me that process seems inevitable, and there's nothing you can do at this point. Russia was previously in favor of saving Germany . This time it is obviously not in the interests of Russia saving it. That's the unfortunate truth. And the western globalists who are controlling Germany now won't mind throwing Germany into the pit.
    1
  383. They will just put in the office people with no kids. Problem solves. That's why they are pushing this LGBTQ+++ agenda , so the elites won't be bound by kids or family.
    1
  384. Yep, they are already saying that. Western propaganda is always the same.
    1
  385. 👍👍
    1
  386. If they wanted to surrender, they should have surrendered. They werent trying to surrender, were trying to play it cheeky.
    1
  387. Well hello there again.
    1
  388. I don't understand Dima's point , so you can't have a platoon or a squad at the front line?? That doesn't make sense.
    1
  389. 👍👍
    1
  390. I mean it's not easy, nothing to be embarrasses about.
    1
  391. Why are you so sure that Russians had destroyed it Dima? To me it is not so obvious. Did Russia confirm it or something?
    1
  392. There's a couple lol
    1
  393.  @biohaze6990  are you saying that Urkaine doesn't have artillery or something?
    1
  394.  @johnknight8152  That dam was built in the soviet union. And yes it went through unexpected stages of operation of more tha normal water levels. I am not saying that that is what happend, but it is one of the possibilities.
    1
  395. It's both corruption and the truth.
    1
  396. There was no real reason. It is clear to me that the US had fortified and made it really hard to take for Russia, that was their strongest point. So in order to minimize losses Russia had to prepare the most for this operation. And it seems like they'd done their homework. We shall see how it will go, but I'm willing to bet that Russia would take Avdievka without much of the losses. Which is what NATO was aiming and hoping for...
    1
  397. I don't think that Ukraine will still exist after all f this.
    1
  398.  @adamoleksak3528  they didn't "freshly mobilize it" It was always there just waiting in reserves ready to be deployed at any moment. Russia had mobilized them 1 year ago. And since then has had ~ 150k troops at the front(constantly) and 250k in reserve(i. e. the reserves are the exact double of whats at the front). Ready at any moment notice to deploy them. But just because it can, doesn't mean that it will. That's the part that Dima doesn't get. Russia will only deploy them when it's deemed necessary, and why deploying them now? I don't see the point... yet Dima is so eager to make a wrong prediction yet again. Although it is good if he is doing that misinformation on purpose for the ukrops I guess.
    1
  399. Pretty sure they will force at least one more package just before Trump gets into power.
    1
  400.  @21stCenturyNomadGaming  Not sure what you mean by pro western report, but everyone has already agreed upon that the losses are 7 Ukranians to 1 Russia ( it was also in one of the Tucker Carlson videos). Though according to my sources it is much more pronounced, because of the difficulty of confirming all of the dead Ukranians. Something like 10+ to 1 Russian. So Russia is doing the best trade you can ever imagine at a war... So if Ukraine had lost around 40k at Backmut , it means that Russia had lost around 4k. which is also a big number, but is incredibly favorable for Russia.
    1
  401.  @shuttze  You realize that has been several versions of those leaks. And they are a product of pentagon. But if you listen to almost any other leak. Like the Israeli intelligence leak... they paint a completely different picture to those leaks. In reality there's a website online that counts all of the dead and missed in action of the Russian troops, and they could only account for 19 thousand . So your figure is blatantly a 10 time exaggeration.
    1
  402. Why Deepstate is giving false information about Russian advancements? I think it's quite simple. They can roll it back in a few days and say that they were successful at recapturing that territory...
    1
  403. Eeran is in danger.
    1
  404.  @tjhodge201  550k losses is not all KIA, KIA's is half of that.
    1
  405.  @tjhodge201  they are not out of manpower. Ukraine is fully supported by the west, which means they can be not working at all, as all the west wants is just a pure supply of fresh meat from Ukraine. So their reserves are not anywhere near being depleted. As I've said before they have a potential of 5 million reserves, but no less than 2 - 3 million. So that 500k casualties, means that they can provide the west several times more of that amount . It's not even close to being over. As with the current rate of meat grinding , they can keep fighting at this rate for at least around 10 years or so... But the question is that, will the US be able to financially sustain Ukraine for another 10 years? That is obvious to anyone at this point that it's economy will collapse within the 10 years mark. So Ukraine will fall before it will ran out of it's reserves. As as soon as the plug is pulled from supporting Ukraine by the west, it will fall within a week. As it doesn't have ammo, resources, money, fuel etc etc. to stand against Russia on it's own.
    1
  406.  leathan7  I don't think it was predicted from day 1 that Trump would get the office in 2024. But the outcome of the war was predictable from day one. As eventually the west would run out of money and Russia would win a war of attrition. Yet the west along with Zelenski still wanted to try... and pay a price of 2 million of his citizens...
    1
  407. 👍👍
    1
  408. They were manipulated by the ukr. propaganda channels to think that those people came to cease their lands etc. bunch of nonsense but there are plenty of those people in any population or a country which are easily manipulated. In fact conspiracy theories are thriving on those people. They will believe in anything if said.
    1
  409. That's the whole point. They are all united against Israel. At this point even Orthodox Christians are united against Israel. Israel = pro western/ pro US. So any sensible person would be against it.
    1
  410.  @kohl1999  they were trying to be smart... lol.
    1
  411. That possum tactic is too funny🤣
    1
  412. You don't really need a remote control , if you just put something heavy ,"like a brick on the pedal". Simple an easy, it just moves forward in a straight line, and you don't need any expensive equipment for that.
    1
  413.  @gmdieselgabi  I know, in some models. It was just a metaphor so that more people would understand.
    1
  414.  @Acepilot235  Not really. Even if you assume a potential failure on the Russian side, if everything that can go wrong would go wrong... Russia still has the ultimate weapon, of around 8 thousand nuclear warheads give or take. Ukraine has none. If all else fails, Russia can ensure it's victory with just a couple of those nuclear warheads. It won't change anything for their strategical nuclear reserves but will wipe out Ukraine off the world map... Everyone keeps forgetting that Russia can't lose, even if you assume that all else fails... Which ofcourse it wouldn't ,as Russia has air superiority and dominance, has stable economy and now (seeing that most people had fled Ukraine ) more than 7 times the people and consequently conscripts, to fight in the war compare to Ukraine... But even that is not an issue, as everyone confirms at this point that Russia is losing way less troops than Ukraine in this conflict. So the win is secure on all fronts, pretty much, it is just a matter of time at this point, of when Russia is going to win it. So those deaths of Ukranians are absolutely pointless, unlike deaths of the Russian soldiers as they can can claim their victory in the end in the largest world conflict since WW2, which in Russia is called a "Great Patriotic War" , and this is just a part 2 of that war , where Russia yet again is going to be victorious.
    1
  415. I mean it's just basics of tactics. Will see how it ends up in the end.
    1
  416. Ukranians are now killing their own troops, using them as literal cannon fodder .
    1
  417. OK, so we are already mid way into the offensive, and this is what the beginning should have looked like so far... And by the looks of it, it's going to be a total failure. Obviously they going to push even more now... but not much by the looks of it.
    1
  418. The more important information for me is the actual liberated territory by Russia, I was trying to calculate it myself, but my Chrome crushed. But I believe it to be something like that: 01 - 01 - 22 ~ 25k sq. km (Crimea) 01 - 01 - 23 ~ 110k sq. km ( the most gains) 01 - 01 - 24 ~ 125k sq. km (couple of days left, but it's not gonna change much).
    1
  419. Lets restructure the whole Northen region of our globe. Alaska and Finland back to Russia. America takes Greenland , Iceland and Canada. Norway goes to America. Sweden to Russia. and the North pole is divided right in the middle. And then it would benefit both countries Russia and USA. In a potential bipolar world after this multipolar world agenda runs out in a few decades.
    1
  420. 4 extra thousand probably since 2014 conflict losses of ukr.
    1
  421. Some of the assumptions this youtuber is making are completely ridiculous. Like that NATO would be willing to attack Russian missiles? that would be an escalation , and would mean a start of the war with NATO, they could only do it "by accident" but they would not be doing a direct attack... as that would be considered as an escalation.
    1
  422. It's "surely" not shurly.
    1
  423. Lol Ukie logic 🤦‍♂🤦‍♂ omg LOL
    1
  424. No it's not. With a modern day equipment which is more precise and deadly, the ratio is around 1:2
    1
  425. According to Khazin that raising of the interest key rate is there just to comply with the IMF international standards. And is that it all can be reversed if they changed the head of Central Bank of Russia. And stopped complying with those policies which he says hurt Russia deliberately.
    1
  426. ZOV from the other side of the world as well
    1
  427.  @barbmartell7901  I never said they can win, Ukraine has no chance. I just don't understand proRussian people like Dima always claiming that the win is around the corner and "everything will fall" for Ukraine soon. I like being objective on the subject. Nothing is going to fall until the western alliance ( mainly the US) is going to stop supporting Ukraine. Hence why all this" automatically is going to fall" or that Ukraine "will fall by spring" etc etc is a completely bogus statement. Even if you support Russia, you don't have to be delusional about the whole situation... may be it's just me. wtever
    1
  428.  @sinenomine4540  I think that it will pick up pace and speed up though...
    1
  429. next year.
    1
  430.  @Bird_McBride  common sense
    1
  431. thank you
    1
  432.  @comatoseps1382  you mean nature of the us and west in general
    1
  433.  @lengisen9637  nato is there solely to destroy ukraine
    1
  434. It is only for the Wagner group. Not the Russian troops themselves. Wagner is a private company that is aimed towards the toughest spots, right now it being Bakhmut, so I personally don't see a problem there, if they are the specific unit that is not taking any prisoners... Just to remind you , that the Ukranian side already had those specific battalions too like Azov, or the National battalions ( like the Georgian one) that took no prisoners too, in fact they documented their war crimes on camera... So seeing it as a response for a private company unit , only seems logical.
    1
  435. I don't think it's Yalta yet. It's 1943 in that timescale. Yalta will come with Trump in 2 years time.
    1
  436. Budanov is basically like a perfect puppet for the higher gov. All that basically means is that all of the ukrop command will done directly by the US generals.
    1
  437. It's all just a guess work at this point. We can only guess...
    1
  438.  @avratzz  Russia hasn't been doing an offensive since the first few months of the feb 22 offensive. It has double the reserves than what it has on the offensive lines. Russia hasn't even begun it's offensive. There no doubt of Russia winning this war. It's a question of choosing a convenient time for a win.
    1
  439.  @avratzz  That's not nonsense it's called common sense (that thing which you clearly don't have).
    1
  440. It's controlled not by Zel. but by the deep state
    1
  441. tbh they were probably just shooting there just for the video.
    1
  442. Thank you Dima
    1
  443. No offense but this channel like hyping things up. Absolutely nothing of importance has happened I've been saying about this possibility for many months since last year. Most of this territory has been evacuated long time before, so the Russians were ready for it too ( ofcourse there are also a few people who refuse to evacuate as always). The Ukranian forces can't take anything of importance but they can take some of the bordering territory but on the grand scheme of things it will only help Russia with mobilizing even more of their troops.
    1
  444. I didn't get this video in my feed or in recommended. Though it did pop up in suggested.
    1
  445. Yeah I agree. The video was a bit too long. 20 min is fine. There weren't any new particular information there except that Ukraine has formed 3 attack groups and is apparently ready to attack. But you could have summarized everything into the 20 min video as usual.
    1
  446.  @5thelementcannabisproduction  come on man , no way it can cost only 13,50 you probably meant 130, which is possible.
    1
  447.  @5thelementcannabisproduction  Dude, there is absolutely no way you can make an explosive big enough to destroy a tank, and a drone large enough to carry that explosive for only 13,50 . 13,50 may be you can just get enough TNT alone , like a kilo of it ( will that be enough though??), for just the explosive, then you will need a fuse and a drone itself to deliver it, and an operator of that drone. As I said, I've looked into it before the absolute minimum for a useful drone would be like a $100 ( that would be a miracle to be that cheap ,but in theory it's possible). Now, perhaps the government can reduce the costs of it and produce it for just $1000 that would be a fair price. But to my knowledge , the ones that they actually use ( and the ones that you see videos of on the internet) they cost $10k for the basic model ( which are most used ones, that drone recently shot down Leopard 2, and it's price was only $10k), and it can get up to $100k for the most advanced models. Anything over that will be some UAV's and specialized drones, for different purposes. And anything under $100 won't be enough to take out a tank, but it can be enough to take out an infantry soldier ,since basic nades are very cheap... but again, we are talking about taking out a moving tank, and $100 is the absolute minimum, you can't get lower than that.
    1
  448.  @babak-shah5005  except that I'm pretty sure it's made up, that it's a foreign name, probably to deprive you of your history. Do you realize that Persia/ Parsia, also refers to the land of the Arians? It has the same etymological root. P arsi / F arsi = Arya of the middle east. With the obvious difference is that there's a P/F at the front. Denoting a particular region of the Arians, and not the whole of the "Arians". I am interested in that root words too, and the actual Arians, originally, many thousand years ago ( 5 - 20 thousand years ago) came from Asia. Modern day lake Baikal in Russia. In fact Asia is named in honor of the original land of the Aryans with it's , which later lost it's "r" ,"arsian" = Asian... Except that back then the anthropological Asian looked like nothing like a modern "Asian" it looked like any kind of European or middle eastern man today. The modern day anthropological Asians are only became a thing since around 1000 years ago. So the Aryans, came from Asia - modern day lake Baikal, touched with the Chinese, then Indians (many accounts of that in their Chronicles both in Chinese and Hindu, of a "white man" from the north coming and enlightening them) then came to the middle east ( modern day Persia/ Iran), and into the Mediterranean, then split into Europe through Anatolia, some went to Africa, and some went through the Caucasus mountains. So Iran can't hold an exclusive right to the Aryans. As it's not the whole Aryan picture, but only a part of it.
    1
  449.  @marionschrotter7065  ehh what's that got to do with anything? And you've completely missed my point. Mind you those 147 countries are simply following up on the western ( the US) hegemony. And every year that number is diminishing. In the NWO, things would be much different and we are getting closer to it each year. By the end of this WW you will see who was right and who was wrong and you will understand what my original message meant.
    1
  450.  @Muskeln-kaufende  The point of that was to inflict as much damage to Russia as possible, to set Russia up at a disadvantage in a NWO post WW2 world. That's why they were keen on the Soviets doing all the work. And the west swooped in on the victory right at the end before the Soviets could capture the Berlin by themselves. i. e. everyone works for their interests. And the US was the beneficiary of the outcome of the WW2 precisely because of that. Russia/ Soviet Union did all the job, the US had collected the majority of the profit. That's why they were doing it. Politics 101.
    1
  451. Ukranian losses are provided by the Russians ( and vice versa) you should listen better.
    1