Comments by "Kora Na" (@korana6308) on "Poland-Ukraine Union. Wagner is Unstoppable. Second Port. Military Summary And Analysis 2023.04.13" video.

Great report. Ukranine keeps sending it's cannon fodder into Bachmut ,and even despite that they keep losing it continuously.
83
Marinka is not a priority, but yeah, Siverks is a hard target, so I don't think Russia will want to advance there as of now. But Avdivka has one of the strongest and most prepared ukranian batallions there, so it won't be soon. It will be a tense fight. Only time will tell how it all eventually goes.
7
I mean technically, they can still do it, as they've announced an offensive and they could throw that offensive anywhere m including Backmut, but honestly not likely ( because of the concentration of forces there)... so yeah...
7
@maxmagnus777 I think you meant to say Donetsk, and Donetsk is being shelled mostly from Avdivka. It has the most priority, Marinka is second and not so important.
6
Nothing will come out of it. Mark my words. I've been hearing great things about this upcoming ukraine offensive, like there will be thousands of drones at the same time, like they will get to the Azov sea etc. ... all of this is just a bunch of bs. That offensive will be a disaster for ukraine, mark my words.
3
No. Definitely not this summer. But it will happen eventually, no doubt about that. Next summers (2024) seems like it might happen, but it's also possible in the 2025... but it will happen eventually. Also Romania too will enter. And there's a potential for Baltic states too.
3
@donetski7324 Both names are technically Russian and were named under a Russian rule. Artemovsk is just a communist name, that was given under the Soviet rule.
3
Isn't it obvious? That Bachmut occupies the most of Russia's time. That is where the most of fighting is happening right now. So if you don't care about your troops like Zelensky (and the ones who are controlling him), they are basically winning time before the counter offensive. They are throwing more troops ( and will keep doing that) just to win some more time.
2
Because they are not sovereign, they been occupied by 'merica
2
Because they are not sovereign. When you are not sovereign you tend to do things which are not in your interests...
2
It's just a guess work at this point.
2
@darthoblivion2615 lol that is where you are wrong. Ukraine was always out of ammunition... however it gets all of it's ammunition and shells from the west. So it doesn't matter how much ammunition Ukraine has, as it will always get more from the west. So ammunition is not the problem here. After the Ukranian offensive they will just lose some of the territories... But it's not going to change much... the west is not going to stop supporting Ukraine ,at least not until the Trump administration takes office. And that is not going to happen soon. Though it might happen next year... Also it's not correct to say that Ukraine can't last long because , because it's not the Ukraine that is fighting ( Ukraine just provides it's meat for the meat grinder) but the west. We have the west vs Russia war and it's going to solely depend on the wellbeing of the west , which is ofcourse is slowly crumbling under it's own weight. But it's not going to be over soon, not this year , that's for sure... The Russia can hold this conflict indefinitely but only if it keeps going like that. I believe if the west will raise the stakes higher i. e. add Poland and Romania into the mix, then Russia will have to mobilize the whole army 1 to 2 mil people, and at that rate , I don't know how long for sure, but it wouldn't be able to last forever, though the west might not have the resources for that kind of scale of war either , so this conflict might have found an equilibrium... but if the west decides to go all in, then it will probably collapse faster than it can do any substantial damage to Russia. So I'm not entirely sure what the western plan is here, because it loses in the end either way, but I have a feeling that they might try going all in.
1
@peterlangan1181 Nobody will ask them if they will get crushed or not crushed. Europe is not sovereign , so they will do whatever the US says them to do. They are not tiny combined it is more than 60 mil people. Which is at least a double of Ukraine. Ukraine will not fall this year. Please stop dreaming and comeback to the real world. The Dems will never give up their last hope and a golden opportunity they are connected to Rot... child and S... ros . So they will not waste their opportunity to continue attack Russia , no matter the costs... This year is definitely not going to be the last one. They might initiate a peace talks , and try to do a peace deal next year because if it's not them , then the Trumps administration will do it not under their terms... But they don't need to end the conflict before that. And that is how you can tell that it will still be going on this year ( no matter the losses or the situation on the battlefield as a whole).
1
@21stCenturyNomadGaming Not sure what you mean by pro western report, but everyone has already agreed upon that the losses are 7 Ukranians to 1 Russia ( it was also in one of the Tucker Carlson videos). Though according to my sources it is much more pronounced, because of the difficulty of confirming all of the dead Ukranians. Something like 10+ to 1 Russian. So Russia is doing the best trade you can ever imagine at a war... So if Ukraine had lost around 40k at Backmut , it means that Russia had lost around 4k. which is also a big number, but is incredibly favorable for Russia.
1
@shuttze You realize that has been several versions of those leaks. And they are a product of pentagon. But if you listen to almost any other leak. Like the Israeli intelligence leak... they paint a completely different picture to those leaks. In reality there's a website online that counts all of the dead and missed in action of the Russian troops, and they could only account for 19 thousand . So your figure is blatantly a 10 time exaggeration.
1