Comments by "Kora Na" (@korana6308) on "Johnny Harris" channel.

That's a complete lie about what you said about Stalin. The goals of the Finnish campaign were well set and determined. In preparations of the big war. Russia/ USSR offered even more of it's northen territories than it asked for , just so that Fins could move their border further away from the St. Petersburg. Fins refused and hence why the war has started. Btw it was in fact the same situation, as the whole of Europe (mainly Germany) supplying them with weapons. And so you would know , exactly what Russia has feared exactly that thing has happened. Fins had their ambitions on Russian territories too, and they crossed the border and helped Germans to invade. So you have no right to say that Stalin was wrong, because all of what USSR officials said would happen exactly happend. And Fins were in the wrong there, you better not make the same mistake again. Or your country would lose more of it's territory yet again.
6
@semarg3712 Я как только услышал по Киевской методичке, "лягушки квакали", что Киев старше Москвы . Сразу рука лицо, ладонью так по лицу ударил, что оно покраснело. Всё сразу стало понятно, и с автором и с его аналитикой если он сразу начинает с Киевской методички. Начнем с того , что это аргумент просто идиoтский который не может быть использован от слова совсем, какой город старше, в России так Дербент официально самый старший, а в Нью Йорке чуть ли не динозавры бегали, когда в Москве от Поляков отбивались, и , что с этого? Это всё была Русь - Киев , Москва , единая история, и Киев мать городов Русских. Но самое страшное, что используя вот такие методички ,про то, что Киев старше , КЛЮЧЕВОЕ СЛОВО, ПО ЛЕТОПИСЯМ ,КОГДА ЮРИЙ ДОЛГОРУКИЙ (РЮРИКОВИЧ - РЮРИК ОСНОВАТЕЛЬ РУСИ) ОСНОВАЛ ТАМ ФОРТ ПОСТ - КРЕПОСТЬ... То , что никто не интересуется реальной историей. Например Дьяковым городищем, которое находится в нескольких километрах от красной площади в городе Москва. То, что люди на этих землях жили ещё до нашей эры доказано археологическими раскопками. Просто официальный статус города ( укрепленного района Руси с Русской дружиной) она получила позже, от этой даты и ведётся официальный отсчёт. Контекст младше - старше глупый, в теории можно задать вопрос, кто был БОЛЕЕ статусней и богаче раньше (и это действительно был Киев) .Но города же ( точнее поселения) существовали на месте Москвы и до прихода Юрия Долгорукого. Аргумент про то, что Москва моложе Киева, не верен изначально. Вполне возможно , что Москва ( по археологическим данным старше Киева). Только повторюсь, это идиoтский аргумент ,который ровным счетом ничего не означает. Это всё была одна единая Русь и люди жили Русские, что в Киеве, что в Москве. А Киев согласно тысячелетней летописи, мать городов Русских.
6
@Hyrppa95 That is simply not true. You've collaborated with Germans before and after the winter war. Nothing has changed ,so the Stalin was right. You've occupied more territories as with what you've left the Russian Empire 20 - 25 years prior to that. And that is just a fact. You did want more territories, and if Hitler had won the war you would have had all of Karelia, that's what the great Finnish dream has always been like. By the fate of history you needed a state supported nationalism in order separate from Russia, and to avoid turbulence becoming an independent country, and which was used by the west (and Germans) in order to strike at Russia (USSR) before the WW started. Stalin was a 100% correct here, and Soviet actions made absolute sense ,in order of preparations of the upcoming world war. FYI Finnish historians ofcourse will try to spin it in their own rights.... that's what all small nations do in their history books. I would imagine that Fins are of no exception. Just try to look at the facts instead of your state sponsored history books. And look at the other side of historians and their point of views.
4
@Hyrppa95 Lol . That is simply not true. And your facts are wrong. Russia was not an ally of Germany. For many reasons. There's a specific term that defies an ally . And Russia definitely was not that . There were diplomatic relations out of necessity like with every other nation on planet earth, and Germany was a big part of that time period. But they never were an "allies", Soviet Russia and Stalin were just basically responding to what Hitler was doing.
4
No you are wrong . And you are running a western / ukranian narrative which is also bunch of lies and propaganda. Those videos only confirm that Russia is doing everything correctly. Operation Z ftw.
3
@Hyrppa95 Molotov and Ribbentrop pact was basically a non agression pact between two sides. After that Hitler had invaded Poland with his European Allies. Russia was just responding to that aggression.
2
@Hyrppa95 Read on the Wermacht forces , it was basically an Allied Europe troops that Invaded Poland. All of what I stated holds true. In the Molotov - Ribbentrop treaty it was suggested that IN CASE OF THE BORDER DISPUTE, if it happend!!! , it didn't state or suggest that Russia and Germany would divide Poland. If Poland had stood it's ground or became an ally of Russia and Defeated the aggressor (Germans), in theory , Poland could have retain it's autonomy. Although in reality every one knew that the WW2 was inevitable, and Poland would not stand it's ground. Hence why that agreement had to be made which was forced on to Russia and initiated by Germany. i.e. Russia was not invading anyone back then, while the Germany had invaded more than 10 countries by then. It was clear that the initiative on invading was on Germany . And USSR didn't really need it or want it. USSR invaded Poland LAST long after Hitler had invaded it . The difference yet again, is that USSR was not the aggressor, but rather it was RESPONDING to what Hitler was doing.
2
@Hyrppa95 Ever mind studying what have had actually happend instead of just spewing out those bs nonsensical one liner "agreements" without actually knowing the whole context of them? Stalin was responding to what Hitler was doing , Russia had only crossed Polish border after the rest of Europe had invaded it and Poland was going to fall within a few days. Just to reiterate Molotov Ribbentrop agreement was a response of Stalin to Hitler and his European Allies invading Poland. In order of preparation for the WW2 which was inevitable, without giving out all of the advantages to Hitler. And setting him up for his Russian Blitzkrieg, and moving border even deeper in Russia before the WW was going to break out, and Hitler would start an invasion of mother Russia. Which by the way to remind you, Poland and Finland were both Russian territories just 20 or so years ago (with great autonomy and rights , but still). So two countries which essentially can be viewed as separatists of the Russian state. Yet Soviet Russia didn't view them that way and gave them (and you) a complete freedom. p.s. in case you got worried ... no I don't want Poland or Finland to join back Russia, you guys should stay separate, thanks.
1
Yes Switzerland unfortunately is not neutral anymore.
1