Comments by "Kora Na" (@korana6308) on "Thunderf00t" channel.

  1. This is so true. Like dude at least show some shiny plastic, like it's not that hard to do what he said in plastic (without it moving) Like at ALL , and it would already show a higher level of responsibility than what he showed there... Like literally I can not comprehend the gullibility of Elon followers.
    58
  2. I still can't get over the fact how stuрid this Tesla Bot presentation was.
    51
  3.  @madamefeast4824  You are wasting time trying to argue with Elon's fan base ( the most gullible and herd like fan base on the internet).
    41
  4.  @wdf70  Not a billionaire. A team of engineers that he had assembled, Musk himself can't produce anything.
    39
  5. It's funny because that's exactly how it works.
    39
  6. I've been waiting for this video for a week.
    32
  7. My thought as well lol. And you know it will be done for the hype too, bunch of vloggers from 2100 for the memes lol
    22
  8. Hooray, my whish was granted. Thank you Thunderf00t !👍
    20
  9. Remember How Musk promised 8 launches in 2024? lol 2023 - 2 launches. 2024 - 3 launches. None of them are getting him closer to Mars... Apparently only the V2 rocket will be the one that supposed to work in 2025... but there's literally no guarantee.
    19
  10. Tf00t regurgitating liberal media sweet sweet li. LOL
    17
  11. I'm sorry I don't agree with the conclusion. Just because it's a bad idea doesn't mean that governments won't do ( when did that ever stop them).
    15
  12. It can definitely reuse it. The question is how much it would cost! And what needs to be replaced. And my prediction is probably alot. And it's not much different from just building a new booster from scratch. Remember. They need to take it down, transport it to the hangar, then disassemble it, test every single part of it to see what needs to be replaced, order those parts, wait for them to arrive, assemble it, and only then it has been refurbished, after that, they need to take it out, test it, put it back in again, then take it out again at launch put it on a launchpad, and launch it... Alot of steps, every single step is not trivial and is complicated in some way...
    15
  13. That's it. If the Russian engineers were allowed to design a rocket properly with all the necessary tests done prior to launching it, it would have been the best rocket in the world. However unfortunately it was a space race, and so they didn't have time to test it and were pushed by the superiors to rush in the design. However I believe that the 5th rocket would have been a success. But that program was canceled right before they could launch the 5th rocket.
    13
  14. Well said.
    11
  15.  @Spencergolde  it used to be just trigger words before, yes. Not anymore. With the advancements of AI we are literally living in the future, it started like 2 or 3 years ago, it tries to detect your general intentions and assumptions, besides your choice of trigger words. In order to censor certain topics or themes they they deem necessary to censor. Same thing is happening on youtube inside videos. ( I don't know if you've noticed it). Your video, any potential 🎻ce gets blurred immediately, without any notice or input from the author. It does so retrospectively automatically with any video now, with the help of a AI detection algorithm... and it's going to get even better... 😥
    11
  16. They exploit this side of our society of wanting to believe, which religion also exploits.
    11
  17. They are expecting him to deliver on cutting gov. spending and he'd already delivered on that and is delivering every single day.
    10
  18. I mean if you had to refuel it once. It would actually not be absurd. It's actually quite common to refuel something once in space. But to do it 10, 15 or how many times, just for a single launch to the moon... is ridiculous. More refueling rockets than the entire Apollo mission that went to the moon.
    10
  19.  @somethingfunny6867  It might be close enough, but it's not orbital velocity! That's the whole point. They still need to prove that they can achieve it. Gagarin's first flight was with an orbital velocity of 27,5k km/h .IFT3 achieved only 26,5k km/h. And it hasn't proved that it can achieve it so far.
    9
  20. We all know why he is doing it though. He had predicted Musk going bankrupt and now he is not going bankrupt because Trump wins Musk get more $$$. And his prediction got sk'd 😂
    9
  21.  @Spencergolde  ah I feel your pain man. Half of my comments get censored too. And the worst part is, you don't know why. As far as I can tell, we are already living in the future, and it now detects semantics of a message. And decides artificially (AI) whether it should be censored or not.
    9
  22. I'm only half way through the video and loving the tears already 😂👍
    8
  23. No Elon, it sounds exactly as it looks - atrocious.
    8
  24. The problem with successful people is that they are ignorant. It's a paradox. They need ignorance in order to not listen to anyone - just to do their own thing, to succeed. But they also get punished for when things go awry, because they did something that others didn't dare to try.
    8
  25. Wow, who would have thought my fav. youtube channel from 10 - 15 years ago turned out to be a woke leftist... I guess those revelations do make sense...
    7
  26.  @WheatSupreme  It exactly matters. For a reason that he has no clue or idea what he is talking about. That's the entire point. He has no expertise literally anywhere, he can only promise and later try to find engineers to do his promises for him.
    7
  27. Exactly the same for me. I thought it was utterly insulting and dishonest with that spandex pitch. It is literally "we haven't even made a prototype or even part of a prototype or even a mock up ...or you know... anything at all ... slides and a spandex suit... yet we are pitching this to the public and expecting them to fall for it. I feel like a school kid would have put more effort into his robo project than the snakesoil salesman and a con artist Elon Musk. Amount of effort went into that pitch was precisely 1 hour : 40 minutes of Elon smoking weed, 15 minutes making slides, 5 minutes ordering robo spandex suit from amazon.
    7
  28. I liked your video and I like you Tf. However you are wrong here. Talking about him being wrong about condoms and comparing it to the lies and deception of the 60 minutes. 🤦‍♂I mean come on...
    7
  29.  @capitanspoiler7393  Yep, spot on. 👍 He predicted that Musk would go bankrupt and it's like 2 years left to his prediction( I forgot the exact date), which he clearly won't go bankrupt now... for at least 4 more years (likely more), if Trump wins. Hence why he is so psed rn. 😂😂
    7
  30. Tf00t there's no such thing as just "jobs" the jobs are ought to do something good for the country which brings the net benefit to it. Just militarizing the country is not the brightest idea on the earth, otherwise everyone would just be building more aircraft carriers and munitions etc etc etc that's not how that works, and I am amazed that a supposed scientist doesn't understand it...🤦‍♂️
    7
  31.  @Firebird762  So when will it not get destroyed? he can't even lay any concrete plans even.Will the SS V2 be the real deal and not explode? nobody knows.
    7
  32. Glad to see you back Tf. I absolutely love your videos. 👍 I don't necessarily agree with everything that you say, but they are entertaining nonetheless.
    7
  33. 5 of my comments were removed under this thread. I can't defend myself.
    6
  34.  @dancingferret6654  😂😂🤣🤣 thanks for a great laugh. Welcome to the real world, where your estimations ( let alone Elon Musk's estimations) are usually off by an order of magnitude. We are speaking strictly from his court filings, so far it had costed him 5 billion dollars to launch 2 starships, and he is asking for 1 billion more next year... We shall see how many he launches next year and how much funding he secures to launch it. Because I'm telling you, it is not going to be cheaper than 200 million dollars. That's simple maths, if he can't even make his normal Falcon less than 50 million per launch. At this point he is just a con man and a snakes oil salesman. Welcome to reality where saying and promising things doesn't really matter, the only thing that matters are you actual accomplishments and actual costs, which are calculated after you had done something. And so far his costs are 2,5 bil per rocket. Which might come down to 300 mil next year if everything goes according to plan. We shall see.
    6
  35. and as an example of what i mean of the tyranny of the left. 50 percent of my comments were deleted under this video. Including 2 comments just in this thread alone ( i hope this one goes through though).
    6
  36. Presumably they need to launch at least 20 rockets without them blowing up... After which it would be sensible to try and put humans there...
    6
  37. I mean it does excite people more than just a rover or a robot. There are no two ways about it. A human on mars would make international news, and would go into history books, something that would mark a new era of the human kind. So I am also in favor of us going to other plantes...
    6
  38. Simple, he is tied to the DoD. His satellite const. is tied to the mil. positioning system. And also the whole Spaceship concept is tied to the program of potential rapid cargo deployment to Taiwan (rapid resupply of AA rockets). That's the only reason why he is still not in jail...
    6
  39.  @captainwin6333  I still don't understand how he get a $50 bil. bonus though. It's literally a GDP of a small country.
    6
  40. Yep. Not sure if it was controlled behind the curtain, but you could see that it was doing some programmed in predetermined paths and moves. So less of an AI, and more of a usual program, of what we had before...
    6
  41.  @yOkay_  SLS had worked and achieved results from just one launch.
    6
  42. I swear watching TF bashing on Elon's sweet sweet lies is better than pron.
    6
  43. @ thanks for understanding. It is literally the same for me. I could also give an advice on what I've noticed and their methods used... but apparently that is c. Ensored too, as I've tried it before, lol. (absolute NK style bubble...)
    5
  44.  @WheatSupreme  You will be surprised at how having more people to your code actually makes it harder to program something... Especially an AI...
    5
  45. Funny thing is... You could set up this level of presentation in a day or two... Thats the level of dedication that he showed here...
    5
  46. THANK YOU Tf00t. I've been literally bombarded in my feed recently on how IFT 4 "was a complete success" yet nobody seem to notice that the most important part - reusability, hasn't been achieved. In fact without reusability part it's just another big rocket like Saturn 5 or SLS, except it's not human rated... I mean, I'm ready to give him the benefit of a doubt... supposedly the V2 rocket is going to be "the thing" let's just wait and see... but something tells me, it's not gonna work either...
    5
  47. At this point you just have to accept it, politics will be politics, and smart people or scientists are really good at science but usually are bad at politics, because they just suck up on the general agenda of their respective political vacuum that they're living in (and yet somehow think that they are right, that politicians are telling them the truth). So I am not surprised with his political views. I've unsubbed before because of it, and resubscribed recently, because he finally stopped talking about politics. Everything else, disregarding politics is great though.
    5
  48.  @DudeSoWin  I mean he did promise them bullet proof, and later approved the message. So they were hoping it wouldn't get through.
    5
  49. Same
    5
  50.  @nulnoh219  Imagine an experimental step worth 2 bil dollars. I'd call it a single step towards insanity.
    5
  51. @ buzzwords? that was a coherent message, someone just didn't get the memo.
    4
  52.  @heinrichb  Lol yeah. That's the funny part. He ran away from his own country's politics into another country and now has the audacity to speak for the US politics... that's the definition of insanity. Mind you, he gets all of it's information from the l. media which is by the very definition is biased...
    4
  53.  @EvanBear  I mean I would go with that level of free speech any day, compare to what we have now. Like 80% of comments gets removed...
    4
  54. As with anything... pretty much, if you are promising something, don't rely on other people to deliver and do it for you. If you are some kind of prodigy and have a some kind of mastermind and a plan all inside your head you wouldn't need to rely on other people but rather steering them in the right direction. Elon Musk is just a lucky con artist /cars salesman there's literally no genius other than convincing investors and gullible people that he is the prodigy which he is clearly not.
    4
  55. good point
    4
  56. To be honest it's only his second launch and it did get progressively better than the last time, but alas as admitted by Musk himself there were more to the second launch that had met the eye. i. e. He had mentioned something wrong happening at t 27 seconds, and also a launchpad needed a minor, yet repair... just after a single launch. That's not normal repairing your launch pad after the first flight, and a huge red flag, which in simple terms means that the cost of launching, would be more than they had originally anticipated it, if you have to do a minor repair after every single launch... But again, he did show an incredible progress, let's wait for the third launch, then it would be easy to extrapolate, because this time, based on his previous experience, it should be a flawless test launch. If it does turn out to be a flawless launch ( i. e. accomplishing what his second launch was supposed to accomplish) then he is on a good trajectory. And if it fails again... you could basically write it off and guarantee Elon going bankrupt within a few years... So I am excited and can't wait for the third Starship launch.
    4
  57.  @StinkPickle4000  but it's not about achieving their goals , it's about achieving a progress, and they'd done that.
    4
  58. agreed. Show me any other person or any other company that could get away with this level of presentation in the world... Everyone else would get scrutinized ...Lol But for some reason for Elon and his mainstream media, criticism doesn't exist ... lol
    4
  59. Yeah , I got a little bit disappointed that Thunderf00t didn't go into more technical details for it... Like the claim is just so preposterous (same as his other claims). Aside from just building a robot itself (which is already impossible) he doesn't have the humanoid AI which is another integral part of the project which is even harder than building a robot itself (which is already impossible, with the characteristics that he claimed).
    4
  60. Surprisingly that's actually not a bad idea. It would actually work. And we already kinda do it already on some things like trains etc. If you have an uninterrupted internet connection with Starlink. It would work perfectly fine to pay someone in India to drive for you.
    4
  61. I've literally just spoke to that person like 3 days ago. He had told me that I'm just jealous of him and that Elon is rich, and he can do with his money whatever he wants because he can afford it 😂😂 I try to tell him that it wasn't his money... never got a response back 🤣
    4
  62.  @maifantasia3650  I've just finished watching the original video. I mean it didn't get trough at first even with a shotgun... but then again the whole thing looked like a click bait pr stunt.
    4
  63. Same
    4
  64.  @winterhaydn  may exact thoughts. Looking for people reaction if they buy it or not...
    4
  65. That's why they unalive him in the first place.
    4
  66. I didn't see that rally, but if it's true, it's actually quite scary. It means that it will be the same type of goal as NASA's race to the moon back in the 60's. Which means that it will be an overblown budget... Expect tens of millions of dollars of taxpayers money to be channeled to Musk in his effort to land on Mars... Though I still don't really get how humans would be able to land there (remember it's not just landing, it's also getting back, is the important part). So they would probably just make a case of landing a Starship with robots on Mars, and make it sound way more profound than it is... But it still would cost billions of dollars of taxpayers money though...
    3
  67. You have to ask yourself on why they did it? what was the purpose? The purpose was the dissolution of Yugoslavia. They didn't do it out of their "good will" they did it with malicious intent.
    3
  68. @ I am honestly would gladly discuss this with you. I don't have any political affiliations. But unfortunately 90% of my comments are censored. I can't even respond, if it's even slightly out of the woke's norm. Not even all of the comments about censoring are getting through, only some of them do. I am not even saying 90% of what I want to say, and still get c. Ensored.
    3
  69.  @seigeengine  I thought you were agreeing with me lol. He is not a fascist.
    3
  70. ehh 1930? that's 25 years before the nuclear bomb. are you sure we didn't make any advances since 1930s lol?
    3
  71. They cost as much as a normal rocket so far. So it still hasn't proven it's worth.
    3
  72.  @kecuthbertson  so they didn't know how venting works? didn't account for it's velocity? regardless. They haven't reached orbital velocity. That's a fact. You can say that they "didn't want to in the first place", just like they didn't want to land a supposedly reusable rocket. It doesn't change the fact they that didn't reach it, and therefore haven't proved that they could reach it.
    3
  73. You don't need anything for that particular mission, it was supposed to be a flyby on autopilot, around the Moon.
    3
  74. Yeah, as Destin has said it himself, a massive communication issue. They can deliver people around the Moon's orbit with an SLS rocket ( supposedly), but to land them on the moon they need another rocket which they had contracted to Musk's Starship. So landing is not happening, but flying around it is plausible.
    3
  75. Can't wait for a new video about Musk.
    3
  76. Thunderf00t will there be a stream for this IFT launch please?
    3
  77. NAFO troll detected
    3
  78. @ where did he say "lie"? The irony in that comment is through the roof... He said about the "cognitive dissonance" and you've 100% proved it with your comment. (same with Tfoot)
    3
  79.  @hydronpowers9014  Same.
    3
  80.  @woopsserg  nobody was laughing at the booster landing (since it was done long time before him), everyone was doubting his launch cost prices, which are now obviously were dubious. The Russian rockets which are not reusable cost much cheaper. It's 1,2 billion rubles for a single Soyuz 2,1a launch which is 12 million USD per launch, that's dirt cheap, nothing even comes close... with a Falcon 9 and that is including all of his "reusability advantages" which supposed to "lower the costs", though admittedly Falcon 9 takes twice as much payload. So the actual cost with the same payload would be 20 - 30 million USD to match the Russian pricing, so basically he still has to halve the price on his Falcon 9 launches to even match the Russian pricing (with non reusable rockets). The question is, can he? It doesn't seem that way.
    3
  81. I was actually disappointed that it wasn't a Musk video.
    3
  82. I mean it did clear the pad so it was a success by Musk standards
    2
  83. my response got deleted again. and it's in, credibly f, an, Noy, Ing.
    2
  84.  @calaisclark9044  I did 5 times. It was deleted.
    2
  85. How much cheaper? let's see the results then. So far 5 billion dollars for 2 rockets.
    2
  86. I'm not sure that they are "succeeding" with regards to the Russian rockets, they had great margins on them. All they did, just reduce those margins to basically match Elon Musk ( same as Chinese rockets). As far as I am aware, they can still reduce the price if Elon somehow manages to reduce it as well. But they obviously want higher margins, so unless there's any competition , the prices won't get reduced and as far as I am aware the price of a launch of those type rockets got frozen at around $60 mil atm.
    2
  87.  @SteveGillham  I'm not an Elon supporter except for his move for the freedom of speech, I absolutely support him in that. But even for me this is a bit too much. It is more so repeating on grief with not much more insightful information. This video could have been 3 - 5 minutes instead of 30, if he just cut out all the grief and repeating information.
    2
  88. Also Tfoot argument of "only spending $50 billion per year on USAID" doesn't hold any water. Tfoot do you realize how much $50 bil actually is? hello?
    2
  89. 2 things that Tfoot is wrong about is Russia and Brexit.
    2
  90.  @WheatSupreme  You will be surprised.🙌
    2
  91. And now my own comments are not getting through. What a great dystopian time we live in... love it.
    2
  92. I think it's not "disliking Musk" it's just that he sees through all his BS.
    2
  93.  @bestdjaf7499  Yeah, his politics game is way off the mark. He should stick to the science stuff. As politics literally a whole another universe. He got almost all of it wrong.
    2
  94. @ you realize they have a tracker right? and are cutting about 3 bil of spending per day right?
    2
  95. 🤣🤣👍👍
    2
  96.  @warpedweirdo  Ehh? Why not though? A) it would have been cheaper, B) replace the old computers with the new ones. Problem solved.
    2
  97. Moreover there was a slide from Space X where they compare supposed V1, V2 and V3 rockets, and for the V1 Starship rocket (the one that they are testing rn), they put a "payload to orbit N/A" ( not applicable). So either they are trying to hide the number, or it can't even deliver anything into orbit at all... Regardless of the reality, we are now waiting for the V2 design rocket which is supposed to be able to deliver 100 tons to orbit (fingers crossed), yet we don't really know how it will perform, because it hasn't been built yet...
    2
  98. @BullShark Profitable? I think only SpaceX is profitable (and Doge coins which he is heavily invested in) everything else is running out of money as far as I am aware...
    2
  99. no no no. His next project will be the Space Elevator. Which he will call Tesla Elevator... mark my words.
    2
  100. Something which is distant in time is actually hard to definitively say with certainty. But the shape of the earth is obvious. Our daily lives wouldn't function if it wasn't roundish, and you could test it within an hour too, without any sophisticated tools. But with the rest of them, we might as well be wrong and don't know the answer. Because nothing would change in our daily lives - except frustrate a few geologists and biologists ... that's it.
    2
  101.  @hamzamahmood9565  They are launching more BECAUSE OF THE POLITICS. Their costs per launch are overblown, and their launches are mainly for their own satellites. Russia would destroy those launch costs, and it eventually will, when there will be a free market yet again. But until then, Musk will be getting subsidized by the US government (which costs manyfolds more to the US taxpayer), he will be the king in launches.
    2
  102. Didn't actually see it. I only saw dust/ sand. I don't think you would see much bits of it, as it would literally just dissolve as far as I understand.
    2
  103. Great video, thank you Thunderf00t
    2
  104.  @theScholar74  Yes. There are 3 designs - 3 rocket, 3 engines and 2 boosters as far as I know. If I understand correctly, the: Starship V1 - rocket v1, booster v1, engine v1. 30 - 50 tons (not supposed to work).2022. Starship V2 - rocket v2, booster v1, engine v2. 100 - 150 tons. 2025. Starship V3 - rocket v3, booster v2, engine v3. 200 - 250 tons. 2027? But so far not a single design was proven...
    2
  105. I've calculated that the price of going to Mars right now theoretical per person is around $10 billion , the projected cost of going to the moon is 1 billion, going to the Earth's orbit/ ISS is ~ 100 mil. So it's close to one order of magnitude (x10), so for him to make the price of going to Mars at $100k he would have to reduce it from current price by 10 000 times... Which means by Elon pricing is 100k to Mars, 10k to the Moon, and 1k to the ISS... which is impossible.
    2
  106. Thank you Tfoot. My island of sanity in this almost insane world.
    2
  107. Same lol. I was half expecting it and was kinda ready for it to some degree... but not to that level of derangement degree lol. I was hoping he would make a video on SpaceX update or something...
    2
  108.  @RustyDust101  the point is that you can't extrapolate from 1 data point. and 2 data points gives no meaning to the data, as it's a linear graph. You need at least 3 data points to extrapolate and make an estimation. And ofcourse the more data points you have the better.
    2
  109. * cough * government and special military * cough * satellites * cough *
    2
  110. I mean I don't really mind it. Whatever floats your boat, as they say. But it just wouldn't work in the real world.
    2
  111.  @zachb1706  It wasn't though. They rely on it being reusable. Having half of your ship burn off in the atmosphere doesn't speak reusability to me. ( you need to completely replace the ship).
    2
  112.  @mherr77m  Shuttle and Starship are of different designes but they face the same goals of reusability. Their problems are actually quite similar, delivering a large thing from space to earth and therefore even heat tiles are the same. It's shape and it's metal composition is different yes, but the idea is the same. And if we are being honest with ourselves, shuttle was a much more successful program than Starship... judging just by the results...
    2
  113.  @pldaniels  it did not land intact. That's the thing. They've literally missed every single goal. AND didn't test to the the highest specs. Just a reminder, they' didn't reach full orbital velocity yet ( though I admit it was within 1%) but they'd have to face much higher speeds of reentry into the earth atmosphere coming from any other planet or the Moon back to earth. So they've practically tested the lightest possible reentry condition and even that didn't go according to plan: 1 Engines failed. 2 Camera feed failed. 3 Tiles fall off. 4 Flaps and metal burnt off. 5 Not landed at the expected site. 6 Telemetry wasn't working correctly. 7 Had to jettison upper stage ( not full reusability). 8 Also tower damage more than expected. etc etc etc and that's just from the top of my head... But just to be clear, this rocket IS a test rocket. So supposedly it was "designed to not work" from the get go. So right now we are waiting for the "V2" rocket design. Which is the one that is "supposed to work"... So all of this talk is irrelevant until we actually see how the supposed "V2" design of the rocket works... It supposed to deliver stuff to the orbit and supposed to work the first time, and it's supposed to launch next year... So we shall see how it will go... only time will tell...
    2
  114. His body language too. It communicates that he is lying , and he is ready to go into full defense mode with some more lies ,but being surprised that nobody had caught on to him yet.
    2
  115. Apollo program was being done first time in the human history. This time he is working on the shoulders of giants.
    2
  116. It's not silly, it's just difficult and expensive. But the rewards is many folds exceeds the difficulties that it would bring to the human kind.
    2
  117. Thanks for your message. 👍👍I completely agree with you.
    2
  118.  @lastofmygeneration  He is right on some stuff only the other half is there just for the sake of h, 8tin on Elon for the sake of it without any objectivity.
    2
  119. ​@ pretty sure I was first who had watched the whole video to begin with. His points were mute. i. e. he didn't even understand what Musk was saying with his argument with an astronaut. That Musk could have done it earlier, and he proposed to do it but got denied by the previous admin. If they cared for their lives, they could have done it earlier... And that point completely flew over Tfoots head.
    2
  120.  @JamesBrown-f9g  We are not his fans. You are confusing his lovers with Tfoot h, 8ters... which is pretty much the same thing, the other side of the same coin. We are not part of the either club. We are looking at things objectively. And objectively because of his h, 8 now he has an Elon derangement syndrome.
    2
  121.  @werrkowalski2985  Yep. Something like that obviously already in place.
    2
  122. Ok, so you are now officially a Russo Phobe. Obvious dislike is obvious.
    2
  123.  @FunkySpaceLord  I presume it's the freedom of speech win. And I am in 100 % support of it too, and I wish he would bring it here too. Since most of my messages are being censored... It is absolutely an NK style distilled bubble, of what is not allowed to be said on y. t...
    2
  124. @ I would GLADLY 100% take it please. I would even take the "non free" Chinese or NK "non freedom of speech" compare to what we have here now. Did you hear me? more than half of my messages are CENSORED. I'm not saying about 90% of what I want to say and I'm still being censored in more than half of the cases.
    2
  125. 👍👍
    2
  126. Someone needs to calculate whats the probability of it combusting. My rough estimation that it should happen once every few years (depending on many factors), so it should occur in the next 2 - 3 years. Good thing (I guess) is that that tunnel will only kill whoever is in that part of the tunnel at that moment... so theory ...not that many... unless it goes massively south.
    2
  127. What's that got to do with anything? And how is this relevant.
    2
  128.  @DarkMatter2525  He wasn't talking about Musk though. He made it about politics. The election, Trump and etc. and sprinkled in some Musk into it...
    2
  129.  @rebeccaaaaaaaac  I think we are all saying that it's our cup of tea UNTIL he got an Elon derangement syndrome. It was fun to some degree too, especially when he was busting hyperloop and roadsters etc. however it had crossed every red line at this point. That instead of objectivity we get just pure and adulterated Elon h, 8 with no objectivity.
    2
  130. 100% 👍
    2
  131. No live stream for this launch?
    2
  132. Not just that he is not an Amerocan... He is a Brit who ran away from his own country and made his home country turn to s. Not a good look for him, lets be frank about it here.
    2
  133. In came out as a Russo phobe just a few months back. So you can ignore his points about Russia and Slavs in general as he is clearly clueless about politics. His best bet is debunking con men where he can prove it and point to their lies with physics. But he is clearly clueless about politics.
    2
  134. Now wait for fearthers to accuse you of disproving a your theory because your result was 31k instead of 40k lol.
    2
  135. 👍
    1
  136. @ you don't agree that he is spreading leftists agenda that brought the US and the people ( the majority) to it's knees?
    1
  137. @ 5 of my comments in this thread alone got removed. I can't even defend myself. ☝👍 Left can only win because c. Ensor every single opinion outside of their own. Austrian painter would be proud of them.
    1
  138. @ "Woke" represents the leftists ideology. Russian communists of the early 20th century were also "woke". They obviously didn't call themselves that. But they were acting in the modern accords of the woke ist agenda. Which is the exact same modern but an evolved one of the modern day. It's just convenient to call it that for what they call themselves by themselves. Just like the communists did. Doesn't mean that they are communists themselves but they adhere to the communists values.
    1
  139.  @WarlockX4  He had bet on him going bankrupt in 5 years like a few years ago. So according to his calendar it should be 1 or 2 years more. But he obviously isn't going bankrupt now, so now he is even more mad, so he will be focusing on him even more lol.
    1
  140. Will there be a stream?
    1
  141.  @Diviance  that's precisely why you have b10 labs inside ex soviet states like ukr. .You get free specimen for you experiments, and because it's drenched in corruption you can get away with a murder. ( There has been many proofs, but they obviously get immediately silenced and censored...)
    1
  142. That is actually very scary of what he has said. Because he is basically inviting NATO to start a nuclear war.
    1
  143. @ That's only the beginning. But that's not the point. That's tens of billions per year... Like no matter how you slice it. That's alot of money. You can do alot of good things with just a billion dollars for the US, I promise you. And if you can't, I am willing to take that job myself. Give me 1 billion and I will promote and make sure that the good will of the US is being seen and heard all around the globe. Like I don't know how to tell you guys that, but 1 is alot of money. Installing a water well in some random African village only costs 1 to 10 grand. With one million you could literally install one thousand of those and promoted the good image of USA and promote peace and democracy etc. I could give plenty more examples of how to do it... The point is, it is absolutely doesn't have to be 50 billion. That money was used for money laundering schemes. That's the entire point, and not for doing good things or promoting anything.
    1
  144. He had ran away from his country many years ago. And now just ' itting on other countries politics that are trying to fix it lol.
    1
  145. by whom?
    1
  146.  @joshieecs  My beliefs are based on the evidence. I don't get it, do you disagree that those lab's exists? Do you disagree that they work on the viruses? It's not really a secret and pretty much an open to public knowledge. The only speculative thing here is the pathogens that they are working on atm and their progress with them, you won't find any of the secret stuff being researched in a public domain for obvious reasons. However there were leaks by whistle blowers... you just have to listen to them.
    1
  147. His information about Russian nukes is completely wrong and concerning. Since it's basically an invitation that he uttered from his mouth for NATO to start a nuclear war. And that can never be a good thing (especially for him) . But if you had to know Russia has revised and modernized all of it's 100% of it's nuclear arsenal recently.
    1
  148.  windrose5988  ehh so how did that Mars colonization by Elon Musk go? we've already established it? Like Elon had promised us? or how's the deer moon program goin etc? He did not accomplish many thing with his Space X. Main of which is a very cheap orbital deliveries. It is not... it is more expensive than the Russian non reusable ones. He hasn't achieved anything outside of actually launching his falcons.
    1
  149.  @kingbugs3558  how is it not proved??? look at all of the previous elec. where did all those votes come from? and where did they go in this elec. ? just disappear? It was an obvious fraud.
    1
  150. But they already do have reusability on their Falcon rockets though. So it does work. Although admittedly you would still need to calculate your actual costs per launch. As just making it "reusable" doesn't just magically makes everything cheaper. As you still need to do maintenance checks... get it off, on pad , replace the parts that you need to replace... etc. so you have to pay for it. And from the way it looks, even with reusability, he can't get it less than 50 mil per launch. Which means that he wouldn't be able to make Starship less than 200 mil per launch ( which is 10 times less of what it currently costs now, around 2 bil per launch), which is the exact amount of money for a proposed Russian alternative called "Yenisei" ( and $15 billion the full Russian moon program) rocket, which is a non reusable normal rocket. So his "cost savings" by using a "reusable" rocket are quite dubious at best.
    1
  151. So he is a Christian? and you got a problem with that? Why does that matter.
    1
  152.  @js2567  I've got to admit I don't know him much. But I'm willing to bet you are making alot of assumptions about him that are wrong.
    1
  153. @ Those were just some of the examples of cuts lol... This is literally why america is going down. This is precisely the reason. The absolute leftists fascists mindset not understanding that they are the bad guys in this trying to shut down Trump lol. ( and yes he is not perfect, he is a typical politician, but at least he's not a fascist/communist like leftists are)
    1
  154. there's so much pain and suffering which was inflicted on me by the left's fascists , so much terrorism and oppression... That the level of delusion of the leftists is beyond belief. They'd surpasses the austrian painter at this point and they don't realize it and don't care. They would perpetuate an endless suffering and oppression of the people including me, until Trump comes and stops it... and even then they try to stop him... pure evil worse than austrian painter.
    1
  155.  @SilverMe2004  That is just pure naivety. I've been in this thing for 20 years. I know precisely what I'm talking about. Seeing it drift into what it became now for 20 years... since 2014 ( I also remember some of the highlights, which people were upset about for a month, then forgot about throughout this whole time...) So I know exactly what I'm talking about. So please tell me, does it appearing for 20 minutes and later not appearing (with people responding to it) after 20 minutes, account for it "not registering on the server" lol... I know what I'm talking about because I know certain words already, which I'm not using which trigger it, as well as other things ( it is hard to keep up with everything these days, since with the help of AI it changes and updates constantly almost "on the fly"). So it far left ideology at this point... And it's got nothing to do with being too "right". If the other point of view is NOT EVEN ALLOWED to be discussed. That is PRECISELY the definition of a FAR LEFT. Not being allowed to discuss the other side ( let alone take it). And yes. I am not saying 90% of the words and what I want to say, because it is not allowed to be discussed. That is the far left by the very definition.
    1
  156. Yep, that's the precise definition of social engineering and controlling of masses. They create an alternative reality which everyone caters too. And people who don't cater into it ( like me), they just censor... So they create an alternative reality of a complete bs
    1
  157. It's $1 bil per launch so far and not $300 mil
    1
  158. My exact first thought about it as well lol. It literally has no clearance. Also seats backwards? It kinda gives it away, that it's not for general purpose roads, but more like riding around a movie set or a studio at 20 miles per hour (30km) at best, unless they change the design completely. 2) Those walking robots were mildly impressive, but engineers were surrounding them the whole way and clearing a predetermined path for them. I guess that's some progress, but to actually make 'em fully autonomous and viable... would take ALOT of work. 3) The most plausible one out of all was the robotaxi, just because there are many companies that are trying to do the exact same thing at the moment. And everyone agrees that there's a huge demand for it... But can he make this robotaxi work? Hard to say... also his cents per mile were not calculated correctly.
    1
  159.  @rebeccaaaaaaaac  Why couldn't they have returned them earlier?
    1
  160. @ "scheduling" got nothing to do with it. SpaceX as Musk had said it himself, could have done it much earlier, if only they'd allowed him to do it. Also the Russians could have returned them in one of their MS missions. It was PURELY political decision - disregarding the human wellbeing and essentially their voters too. Purely political decision for politicians sake.
    1
  161. 2:52 this is legit heart breaking. How is this legal?!?
    1
  162.  @Octuly  Not that they couldn't do it. It's that there weren't much reason to it. Because 'mericans already landed on the Moon.
    1
  163. Great video as always👍. Little known fact, Russia has the cheapest and the most reliable rockets in the world. The new Angara A5 rocket is projected to cost at around 2 billion rubles ~ 20 mil USD per launch when it gets into the full series production phase, per 25 - 40 tons payload. Which is around $1k USD per kg, so a human would be like a 100k. And it gets even better efficiency on an Amur type rocket, with a potential of up to $100 per kg. So they could be gouging and competing at any price. As nothing can beat Russia in terms of cost per launch in space, only the politics and politicians could stop it from dominating the market... But it means that the domestic market of Roscosmos has an absolutely staggering potential... With the highest efficiency...
    1
  164. Humans are much more epic and exciting. And it would go into history books for everyone to remember like Gagarin did. Also travelling with robots is extremely complicated. Basically you need an advanced AI robot to do everything. Because the delay ( ping) is literally several minutes. Then there's a question of morality arises. It has to be a conscious AI robot exploring it, and sending us the data... When does a human arise in all of this? besides creating the robot in itself? It would eventually be remembered and thought of as "robots did everything", when machines will eventually take over humans... etc. So in my opinion, it is very important to have a physical human being. Accompanying a robot, on other planets.
    1
  165.  @VColossalV  mate... you realize that any test that you do is a scientific data which is always useful and therefore a success or at least you could always call it a success... that's the whole point. However we are not talking in terms of scientific data, but rather from usefulness perspective of a working Moon rocket that they promised for NASA . There's literally almost 0 progress towards that ,any useful progress for sure.
    1
  166.  @VColossalV  Mate you can collect data even when you are just walking at the street. Doesn't mean that your walking is a success. It doesn't progress towards anything useful. There's a huge gap walking towards a pit and walking towards the oasis. Both of them are progress and both bring useful scientific data, that you can always call a success. At the end of your walk you will either end up in a pit or your own and personal paradise. Musk is going towards a pit so far.
    1
  167. Please make a new video about Elons new Robot bs :))
    1
  168. Do they scratch their ass with billions of taxpayers money too?
    1
  169. Those companies are just the US government affiliates doing their dirty job and the dirty job of the pentagon. The spaceX was planned originally to be used by the military, and it is serving that exact purpose as we speak. (with conflict in Ukraine)
    1
  170.  @karatos  While I agree with you for the most part, however, the Starship program wasn't a total failure. At least not yet. They did get an improvement on the second launch, and also all engines had lit up. There was a successful separation, and also it had used 90% of it's fuel correctly. So there were admittedly some success even though the mission itself was a failure. And more importantly, the program is still ongoing.
    1
  171. Mate , first of all their goals for that mission were bogus, but even those goals they weren't able to achieve. Mind you 1 launch of that rocket costs like 20 Soyuz normal launches.
    1
  172.  @platoplat498  all of what you've said has been achieved before. The only achievement is that the N1 Russian rocket was able to fly for 2 minutes, while Starship flew for 8 minutes.
    1
  173.  @platoplat498  It was a super heavy rocket with 30 engines though. That's the point. That it's only accomplishment compare to N1 was the stage separation and flying 4 times as much as the N1 (8 minutes vs 2 minutes). Which is not much progress considering half a century of rocket development and especially using modern day computers and AI. Engineers back in those days just used pencils and rulers designing their rockets.
    1
  174.  @hans-joachimbierwirth4727  besides that, Russia is capable of producing nukes. So saying that Russia doesn't have any... Outside of it just being a blatant lie without any actual substance , is actually an invitation for NATO to start a nuclear war with Russia. And there's something wrong with Thunderfoot by even saying that. Just imagine if there was youtube in North Korea, and you started saying that Kim doesn't have a working nuclear warhead and that it can't reach the US... Just by saying that provocative comment I would have sent him to Kim... There's no reason to be that provocative about something which is that serious... Russia has the most amount of nukes out of any nation. Even if only some of it works ... It will still be enough to wipe out anything... And one of the targets will be the UK , which has been provoking Russia since the begging of times and which is what Thunderfoot (he is British) is doing personally again with his comments...
    1
  175. Been waiting for this !!! Thanks so much Thunderf00t!!👍
    1
  176. They supposedly have different versions of the Starship they are only flying the first "V1" version of the rocket for the tests, which apparently can't carry any payload to the LEO. Supposedly they are building two V2 rockets right now, which supposedly would be capable of carrying, 100+ tons to the orbit. They have four or five V1 rockets left, so apparently 4 or 5 more failed "testing launches" after which there're supposedly going to get a better designed rocket... but that is all supposedly and quite frankly not guaranteed.
    1
  177. 100% of the Rus. nukes are functional. Don't listen to the clown head Thunderfoot in that regard.
    1
  178. @ that's the definition of fascism, leftists proved it yet again who they were to begin with.
    1
  179. 👍👍
    1
  180. You should watch his live streams of launches instead of whining in the comments. He celebrates the achievements every single time when it's due, but also points out the lies of his.
    1
  181.  @liamnehren1054  I'm not from the US either, frankly doesn't really matter to me who wins, I'm just enjoying the show. However Trump is definitely a more sane person in this. ( can't even go over why that it because 9 out of 10 points are censored by youtube... AND THAT IS WHY HE IS BETTER. LOL).
    1
  182. He is also ignoring the fact that Russia is capable of producing it in the first place... He had implied that all of the Russian nuclear weapons are from the USSR which is just plain wrong. Russia had officially modernized 100% of it's nuclear arsenal.
    1
  183. I sincerely doubt that supposed 250k per engine cost. However, the rocket is not just it's engines. It's the whole package that counts including servicing it. So far the rocket costs $2,5 billion. And for the next year, he is asking for $250 million per Starship rocket of external funding. So $250 mil is the actual price of the rocket... that is IF everything goes according to plan.
    1
  184. No, because he is speaking out of his a. Like any amount of research would tell you that Russia is maintaining it's nukes well enough, and had reported to have modernized them 100%.
    1
  185. Humic Extract is literally "black soil". They are selling water with like a small grain of dirt dissolved in it... lol
    1
  186.  @roger5059  just fyi I'm not from America. It is obvious that people assume certain things based on predispositions that they have, and they don't realize that other people with completely different views... that they haven't seen and haven't categorized yet - exist... I am not one of the people that you think I am. I was making a different point.
    1
  187. The funny thing is that most likely no. But the next decade actually looks good. That's when Russian and Chinese moon missions get into high gear, and probably Space X would go bankrupt by then and they would hire NASA to do the full Moon mission for them too.
    1
  188. I havent seen them in a long time.
    1
  189. It's not that hard to get it on Mars. We've been sending rockets to Mars for a long time. The question is Human landing ( and getting it back)... that I question very much. I don't think it is possible with the current tech. But sending a rocket to Mars is relatively easy.
    1
  190. You forgot a more important factor. China had team up with Russia. So they are going to achieve it ( together with Russians).
    1
  191. Yeah, already grey hair on his head start showing.
    1
  192. Something tells me he is in sync and works fully for the government. Hence why they cover him and his delays with those silly reasons...
    1
  193.  @-xirx-  common sense? since when it is common sense to oppress the majority? That's communism. Not common sense,
    1
  194.  @jacksons1010  pretty much yeah. But so far we don't know what we don't know. All of this is speculative, including refueling. Because he could always say that it was an experimental design... (which we weren't told in the beginning). The supposed V2 design is supposed to work. Which supposedly will be launching in 2025. But we don't know. Until we see a V2 performance and it getting to orbit. It's hard to project on anything else. There's a chance that it would blowup on a launchpad. And we will be waiting for the V3 design anyway...
    1
  195. "disaster of command and control" ahahaha
    1
  196. There are only 2 explosions so far as there were only 2 launches of the Starship. Or you do count booster and a rocket separately?
    1
  197. @ you missaw that those were the radical leftists that were trying to destroy the world, not Musk.
    1
  198. Unfortunately that's the world that we live in.( At least in the capitalistic ideology ) People with more money than sense will be doing stupid things, where eventually one of them manages to gather a team of actual real engineers that will manage to deliver on 1/10 of your original promises so you don't look as foolish anymore (that's what happend with SpaceX). If you need anymore proof just look at your typical billionaire real estate tastes, useless designed houses with so many rooms that they never even visit in their lifetimes, with gold plated furniture that you can't even sit on, cold stone floors and walls which make you claustrophobic , yet it's supposed to look cool and lux because it's a rare black marble etc etc... Times like these you realize why the Russians did the socialists (communist) revolution back in the 1917 against the bourgeoisie (upper class) except back then it wasn't as sever as in the capitalistic US now.
    1
  199. Also the seats are placed in the wrong orientation.
    1
  200. Great video as always, thanks TF.
    1
  201.  @imogenwren  That's simply not true. According to their original plan the rocket was supposed to splash in waters near Hawaii, and the booster was supposed to softly land in sea near the launch site. They did not achieve either of those goals.
    1
  202.  @imogenwren  I know what a soft touch down means, and it was not achieved. Either way it is all just pointless talks at this point. We shall wait and see for the third Starship launch...
    1
  203.  @imogenwren  yes, and they didn't achieve that.
    1
  204. More like a few thousand .
    1
  205.  @nathanjora7627  I mean Jesus Crucifixion was iconic. We are still living by those principles that he had laid out 2 thousand years ago... regardless of whether it was true or not or whether you believe in that or not, we are still living by those principles laid down 2 thousand years ago and build our civilizations around it, so that's pretty iconic imo.
    1
  206.  @nathanjora7627  That is precisely what Jesus had taught. And it's a pity irony that you don't understand that. Before Jesus there was no concept of individualism. He had brought it up, popularized it as a religion and made it a thing. It's you and the God relation and not your king or your master. Before that time, with example of ancient Egyptians. You didn't belong to yourself, you belonged to the king. Hence why when the King died you had a whole suit of his slaves follow him into the grave... as people didn't realize that there could be another way of living... Because there was no concept of individualism back then spread into the masses before Jesus. That's the whole point. And we've based our calendar around that, honouring him and his teachings... and it's a pity that people of the western world don't even understand that.
    1
  207. Pretty much. After he'd realized that his prediction of him going bankrupt in 5 years wasn't going to happen, because Trump got it's 4 year term, he went absolutely mad with him lol... He also skipped one of the fun parts, which I had actually enjoyed before, his live streams of Starship IFT launches... Perhaps, just in case it goes well, he doesn't want to be there lol ( all this time pretending that he actually cared for the engineers if they had accomplished something but not Elon... yeah it was all bs from the get go... he was there to just see Elon's rocket crash and burn, and didn't care about the engineers in the slightest). And now just trying to find any reason for more h, tered on Elon. Which is sad, because I absolutely loved debunking vids
    1
  208.  @professionalspaceenthusias3024  so can you tell us when are they going to achieve success?
    1
  209. I do not understand why people bury themselves up. Like how hard can it be to be neutral on politics, when discussing any topic really. But for some people and channels it's literally mission impossible.
    1
  210. It's been in the recession since 2020. It's just that every credible source and freedom of speech was silenced. So they were able to lie it out. The recession itself was a known fact for a long time. It's the question whether they would finally tell the truth or not. That's the only question.
    1
  211. Being spectacular doesn't mean that it's of much use. Zeppelins were spectacular too but it went nowhere. How about show us actual progress. That does at least something useful that it's supposed to be doing in the first place.
    1
  212.  @mstecker  I am doing more for interplanetary travel than Musk , why aren't you praising me then. Musk does not help advance interplanetary travel.
    1
  213.  @kennethferland5579  there were only 2 full Starship launches so far. I know that we can't extrapolate with only 2 inputs in data. That's why I said that I'm waiting for a third launch. You need at least 3 to do a basic extrapolation.
    1
  214.  @Fred-gu6pk  The polls are made up. So it doesn't really matter.
    1
  215. You could easily program something like that to the Elon Musk levels with no problems. It will just take time. The problem is exactly the next step making, it fully autonomous , which is practically impossible. ( Though I know how to theoretically do it, but the reality is, Musk isn't even doing any of the right steps to potentially make it work, he is literally a hyped up sales man with no talent or reason, which over hypes things and then gives his "idea" to other engineers to solve for him, and it never worked except for the SpaceX)
    1
  216.  @nowhere529  The worst part about the d. state is not that it's branched out all around the world, in different states and govs all around the globe. But that there are actual PEOPLE who bought into their agenda. Even rational thinkers like Tfoot. Try battling that...
    1
  217.  @electric7487  lol you are a brave man. As soon as I saw that success vs failure war on wikipedia, I was like nope... I'm not doing it, and left. 😂
    1
  218.  @robertkirchner7981  not good is an understatement. She is a puppet of the d. state. Trump is at least independent - not connected to the d. state. So choosing between the two, Trump is an obvious preferable choice...
    1
  219. @ You realize that Stalin literally fought for what the Dems are fighting for? The communism started in Russia with absolute DEI that absolutely destroyed Russia. The Dems are roleplaying 100% communists now.
    1
  220. @ That's precisely why the d. state got rid of him. Yes the d. state are the leftist commies. They are doing the exact same thing. Also Stalin was being directed for the most part by the d. state of the communist state of USSR. Literally the exact same thing happening in the US... the EXACT same.
    1
  221. @ There's been plenty of proof including both from the official gov. department and it's spokesperson . How is that a propaganda? Did Dems not supports a woke and DEI agenda? Have you guys gone blind?
    1
  222. Starlimk purely relies on the SpaceX. If it fails then Starlink fails too.
    1
  223. I wouldn't even say mostly... he is right on some stuff. But not mostly.
    1
  224. Where's a new video. Roasting Elon Musk with his update on the Starship would be glorious. Albeit he did promise to launch it in Feb (this year) and that it should 100% work this time...
    1
  225. I know that point of view is popular among many scientists but I don't agree with it. No robot will explore the surface of another celestial body like a human would. The Moon perhaps is the easiest of them all, and is more just a gateway to other planets... But going to anything beyond the Moon i. e. Mars, you would have massive signal delays, which makes any proper exploration mission really difficult to do. Robots ofcourse can do most of the job, but definitely not everything.
    1
  226. Well said. 👍 Pretty much, he reiterated all of the lib. media lies. So I know exactly what channels he is watching now... And also, his opinion is no different to any other lib. media outlet. So I don't really get it. He used to fight the pop. lib. media, and now he is on their side somehow, thinking that that time those libs are right... I really don't get it. But oh well..
    1
  227.  @TwitchyMofo  It's much more complex than it looks that's the point. Take fighter jet planes for example. Right from the first or second gen jet planes and their engines, you already knew what the next couple of gens would look like ( with slight deviation on the direction, but the basic principle remains)... Supposedly dreaming of an F22 in 1960s... It is absolutely possible in theory, but you know that it's a different gen of vehicle and you can dream about it, and work towards that goal... but in reality, your actual practical plane that you CAN build would be an F14, so thinking of building an F22 in 1960s is counter productive. The technology is not there yet. Same thing with Starship. It's completely different design, pretty much a new gen (or a deviation of gen) of rocketry... It is not really possible to build it at that time... And certainly not in 2022 as he had originally promised.
    1
  228.  @TwitchyMofo  Metal has also been around forever doesn't mean that it's the same thing as a rocket.
    1
  229.  @TwitchyMofo  33 raptor engines in one system working as one (and potentially succeeding). That's new.
    1
  230.  @TwitchyMofo  It's size is new, with that many engines. My F22 analogy is perfectly fine. You have a theory where something in theory is possible like fission reactors. But the technology is not there yet. There's no reason claiming that you would be able to do it. Falcon 9 and falcon heavy is a worked out old tech, Starship is not. Nothing of that size with that many engines had worked before. Every single engine that you add to the craft or a single frame, creates additional oscillations to the system, trying to manage that symphony of vibrations with so many points that could break or could come in resonance with each other is an incredibly difficult task. That's what happened to the N1 rocket as well. It was riddled with the same problem as well. So far Musk did only slightly better than N1. We shall see how it will turn out in the end, but make no mistake, it's an incredibly difficult challenge which hasn't been done before. It is much easier to have 2 - 4 big engines, to make it work right, than to have 33 engines work as intended.
    1
  231. There was nothing new in the Falcon 9 rocket, everything on it has been done before. However Starship is a different beast, which is exactly why there are no guarantee of a success. It's the largest rocket ever created by the human kind, which uses small engines, instead of a more reasonable approach with largest engines. The closest thing to the Musk's rocket is the N1 rocket , but Musk's rocket is twice as large. There is no guarantee that it's even possible, unlike how it was possible with the Falcon 9, which is a copy of any other modern rocket in the world.
    1
  232.  @legeek-l6p  It has been done before, just not commercially (landing part) , and everything else especially, the rocket itself was nothing new.
    1
  233. Or may be you should erase yourself from within. Putin is the only person that stood against the fascist democracy hegemony ... Which is the US.
    1
  234. He is wrong though. His videos about Slavic countries and especially Russia are always wrong.
    1
  235. Guys Tesla is not doing well I give you that. But it's far off from being a disaster and/or going bankrupt. Musk is in the gov, and he is getting endorsed by the POTUS. Also Tfoor is deliberately showing the stock price for the last 3 month, and not showing it for the full year, which would show that it just returned to it's normal price. I'm neither a Musk supporter nor a hater, just saying how it is...
    1
  236. Well he was directly inspired by the N1 he has said it himself many times. So it's no wonder that it looks similar, or kind of similar to it. However they are different. Less stages, less cone shaped design.
    1
  237. Yeah, the funny part in this is that he still hasn't achieved the orbit with his Starship (atm it is classified as sub orbital test flights), but let's be honest, he is pretty close to reaching the orbit and to deliver some kin of a payload to it... But the question remains, how much payload can he deliver to the orbit as every kg counts... and how practical is the reusability of a Starship (it's refubrishment cost and time to re fubrish). On top of everything else.
    1
  238. Lol Tf is bh that Musk is not going to go bankrupt as he had predicted because Trump got elected and he got promoted lol.😂
    1
  239. Wheres the dancing tesla robot at the end?
    1
  240. my comments got c. Ensored again fsake
    1
  241.  @benfaulkner1979  Haha, this is just gold. It's scarily close to the reality...
    1
  242.  @godfreyofbouillon966  not just that, I'm pretty sure it's one of those bots that focuses on framing them as being Russian. Pretty simple technique l. media says Russian = bad. So they go into the comment section with bots saying that Russia had benefited because of it, so they must be bad too, because the l. media said that Russia is bad. lol
    1
  243. @ he's got good charisma but he is a puppet of the d. state. He destroyed the US.
    1
  244. @ you realize that that (which can not be named) was caused by Dems of the d. state right? to begin with? Trump is literally revealing it all now.
    1
  245. That's actually a good point. Yeah I agree. It seems like his bs is finally slowly getting caught up to him.
    1
  246. That is one of the most stupidest things that I've ever heard. And no, Russia has no problem with nukes.
    1
  247.  @drakemallard1486  ...I'm a Trump fan too, what's that got to do with anything?
    1
  248. You've been spoon fed by the ukr. lies
    1
  249. I was actually expecting a Musk video... there's so much material on him lately...
    1
  250.  @davidstinger1134  it's not just about the cost and development it's also whether it is successful or not. SLS was a success SS not.
    1
  251.  @Mike_Goldberg  there's is a big difference shooting your rocket straight up in space and shooting it at an angle in order to get inserted into the orbit. JB only shoots it straight up. So there's no practical use to it, outside of some fun high altitude views for humans.
    1
  252. @ because the d. state was controlling it for several decades now. So it's technically a coup, so he is correct.
    1
  253. He is full of it. The truth is actually the opposite. But he is a Russo phobe, so it all makes sense why he is that deluded.
    1
  254.  @minagica  Russia has never "threatened anyone with cutting any gas off" that is just a complete lie and the opposite is truth. Russia was trying to sell it's gas and did everything to fulfill it's agreements and more. The EU and US wanted to paint Russia black and make responsible for everything (energy crisis and economic decline) basically blame Russia for everything bad that is happening. And Russia knew it , and never used it's pipeline for it's politics, only pure for the economics of it. Yet it still gets blamed for everything, but at least it can prove that it wasn't the one to blame... Except people like you or him don't really care about the truth, you are just going to blame Russia blindly anyway, because your TV host told what you should be thinking about Russia. What they call a she... eple
    1
  255. Spotted an Elon fan , lol
    1
  256. the point of Musks proposal was that he was going to make a new leap. And deliver like 100 times the cargo of what they had originally delivered with Apollo...
    1
  257. Yep, that's my first thought as well when I've heard it from Musk.
    1
  258. ... and it didn't come. As the video wasn't really about the IFT7 as everyone had expected.
    1
  259. The current one is indeed. But the funny thing is that IT IS possible. The problem with possibility is that nobody really wants to think about how to actually make it work. With things like hyperloop their best go at it, is just throw some more money at the undergrad engineers hopefully they figure something out 🤦‍♂. The thing why it had worked with Space X is because they already had rocket engineers working at it, with a proof of concept that had been done before it. So throwing money at rocket engineers to make you a rocket, makes perfect sense, and will end up in a success, though making something that hasn't been done before even in the same field, is much harder. With example of Starship, so far not a single successful launch. But they might figure it out eventually . We shall see.
    1
  260. Thunderfoot, please don't be digging a deeper hole for everyone including yourself, talking about Russia. Saying that Russia doesn't have a working nuke is basically an invitation for the west to start a nuclear war. And you will be disappointed to find out that Russia actually has what it says it has. But at that point it will be too late. Since one of the priority targets will be the UK...
    1
  261.  @bastiaan7777777  In reality it's just presumed that it's 250k production capacity. You would need a really big manufacturing line to facilitate that production and I doubt that....
    1
  262. Each SLS rocket costs $4+ billion. nevertheless they WORK. With SpaceX's rockets, their concept hasn't been proven so far. That it would work at all... And there are great doubts that it would work at all... So so far they are just wasting taxpayers money until proven otherwise, and only after they achieve something with it, we can start talking about their efficiency compared to the working rocket of SLS.
    1
  263.  @TheArmstrong1969  They way they structured it, the do want to land before China, even if they delay by a few years.
    1
  264. genius and genious are both acceptable spellings. get over it .
    1
  265.  @PsychonunBO2  lol I personally don't care much for Musk except that he promotes freedom of speech and we severely need him here on y. t. ,since half of my messages are being deleted. But this obsession of Tf with far left views are getting a bit cringey. Where are his videos of debunking frauds? I genuinely can't remember when was the last time I saw it.
    1
  266. I don't agree with everything in this video. But thanks for the video anyway.
    1
  267.  @sdovhfunlahsvisegbakshfjbs4621  so how do you distinguish between a commitment and ignorance? You are literally have to ignore everything else to concentrate on the task. The only difference is that some people will get more hurt than others.
    1
  268. Lol 2 billion dollars per rocket launch... I mean even if he bring his launch costs down 10 times it still wouldn't be that impressive... but can he? 15:55 something bad happnd at t 27 seconds? ... there's no chance
    1
  269.  @philipb2134  so? does that justify not having it?
    1
  270. @ are we in a crowded theater? Also, you can shout fire it's just that there would be consequences if you did it with malicious intent. I can't even say 90% on y. t... and 50% is censored. That is not OK.
    1
  271.  @Hailfire08  The point of virus engineering is getting rid of the people you don't like (and not everyone). A bio weapon. That's the whole point.
    1
  272. Agreed
    1
  273. Honestly you can just ignore his bias about Russia. He is British and he doesn't like Russia. So everything he says about Russia is irrelevant.
    1
  274. Ariane is not going to work out.
    1