Comments by "k98killer" (@k98killer) on "Vaccine mandates" video.

  1. It could be that the polling institutions are dishonest, or it could be that their methodology is somehow flawed, e.g. people are more likely to self-censor and fall in line with a perceived majority in in-person/telephonic interactions but more likely to hold fast to their opinions in pseudonymous online interactions. It is also possible that online interactions are more susceptible to Sybil attacks that skew the results artificially. It would be interesting to see the change in responses under onymous vs pseudonymous conditions, for example having a component of the survey take place with zero knowledge proofs or ring signatures with large anonymization sets.
    1