Comments by "k98killer" (@k98killer) on "AGI: What will the first 90 days be like? And more VEXING questions from the audience!" video.

  1. People are skeptical about mRNA vaccines because the inventor of the technology tried to blow the whistle about it being misused, but he was silenced (look up the "Trusted News Initiative" sometime). The track record of the recent jabs has been alarming when you look at the data. In particular, they said that the lipid nanoparticles were localized and did not go systemic, but that claim has since been proven false. There is enough evidence at this point to conclude that the current vaccines carry risks for myocarditis and thrombosis due to amyloid formation -- the spike protein basically becomes a prion. And finally, I'll say this: if the big pharma companies didn't have anything to hide regarding these vaccines, they would have just released the safety data rather than fighting it in courts for years, and they wouldn't have needed a literal conspiracy to suppress information if the information was not damning.
    1
  2.  @maryhadid  Incorrect. The risk from covid infection is correlated with age and pre-existing medical conditions while the risk of myocarditis from the vaccine is inversely correlated with age: for the young and healthy, the risk of myocarditis from the vaccine is higher than the risk of severe covid infection last time I looked at the data. The risks of thrombosis have yet to be fully calculated because the authorities in affected areas are actively suppressing the information and threatening any coroners who try to report the alarming increase in excess mortality from thrombosis. The consensus view in the dark age was that heretics should be executed. A coerced consensus is a bad estimate of truth when an entrenched power is suppressing information and preventing dialog, which has been the case over the past few years. Advocates of censorship are inherently untrustworthy, and any so-called consensus they conjure up by censoring dissenting views is a false consensus. And it is worth remembering that they have not done long-term safety studies with these vaccines, so any claims of them being safe are made largely from a point of ignorance. If they were proven safe, why were the manufacturers granted legal immunity to prevent lawsuits?
    1
  3.  @maryhadid  I responded with a source, but that comment has been disappeared. Another example of censorship.
    1