Youtube comments of k98killer (@k98killer).

  1. 2200
  2. 963
  3. 759
  4. 711
  5. 646
  6. 637
  7. 622
  8. 515
  9. 508
  10. 483
  11. 436
  12. 406
  13. 397
  14. 326
  15. 312
  16. 301
  17. 283
  18. 235
  19. 219
  20. 218
  21. 198
  22. 192
  23. 184
  24. 148
  25. 148
  26. 146
  27. 139
  28. 139
  29. 138
  30. 131
  31. 119
  32. 117
  33. 110
  34. 105
  35. 100
  36. 99
  37. 98
  38. 97
  39. 88
  40. 86
  41. 83
  42. 80
  43. 80
  44. 79
  45. 77
  46. 75
  47. 75
  48. 74
  49. 70
  50. 69
  51. 68
  52. 67
  53. 65
  54. 65
  55. 63
  56. 63
  57. 62
  58. 62
  59. 62
  60. 59
  61. 58
  62. 56
  63. 54
  64. 54
  65. 53
  66. 47
  67. 46
  68. 46
  69. 46
  70. 46
  71. 46
  72. 46
  73. 45
  74. 44
  75. 42
  76. 41
  77. 40
  78. 40
  79. 39
  80. 38
  81. 38
  82. 38
  83. 36
  84. 36
  85. 35
  86. 34
  87. 34
  88. 32
  89. 32
  90. 32
  91. 32
  92. 31
  93. 31
  94. 30
  95. 30
  96. 29
  97. 29
  98. 28
  99. 28
  100. 27
  101. 27
  102. 27
  103. 25
  104. 25
  105. 25
  106. 25
  107. 24
  108. 23
  109. 23
  110. 23
  111. 23
  112. 22
  113. 21
  114. 21
  115. 21
  116. 21
  117. 20
  118. 20
  119. 20
  120. 19
  121. 19
  122. 19
  123. 19
  124. 18
  125. 18
  126. 18
  127. 18
  128. 18
  129. 17
  130. 17
  131. 17
  132. 17
  133. 17
  134. 17
  135. 17
  136. 17
  137. 17
  138. 17
  139. 16
  140. 16
  141. 16
  142. 16
  143. 16
  144. 16
  145. 16
  146. 16
  147. 15
  148. 15
  149. 15
  150. 15
  151. 15
  152. 15
  153. 15
  154. 15
  155. 15
  156. 14
  157. 14
  158. 14
  159. 14
  160. 14
  161. 14
  162. 14
  163. 14
  164. 14
  165. 13
  166. 13
  167. 13
  168. 13
  169. 12
  170. 12
  171. 12
  172. 12
  173. 12
  174. 12
  175. 12
  176. 12
  177. 12
  178. 12
  179. 12
  180. 11
  181. 11
  182. 11
  183. 11
  184. 11
  185. 11
  186. 11
  187. 11
  188. 11
  189. 11
  190. 11
  191. 11
  192. 11
  193. 11
  194. 11
  195. 11
  196. 11
  197. 11
  198. 11
  199. 11
  200. 10
  201. 10
  202. 10
  203. 10
  204. 10
  205. 10
  206. 10
  207. 10
  208. 10
  209. 10
  210. 10
  211. 10
  212. 10
  213. 10
  214. 10
  215. 10
  216. 10
  217. 10
  218. 10
  219. 10
  220. 10
  221. 10
  222. 9
  223. 9
  224. 9
  225. 9
  226. 9
  227. 9
  228. 9
  229. 9
  230. 9
  231. 9
  232. 9
  233. 9
  234. 9
  235. 9
  236. 9
  237. 9
  238. 9
  239. 9
  240. 9
  241. 9
  242. 9
  243. 9
  244. 9
  245. 9
  246. 9
  247. 9
  248. 8
  249. 8
  250. 8
  251. 8
  252. 8
  253. 8
  254. 8
  255. 8
  256. 8
  257. 8
  258. 8
  259. 8
  260. 8
  261. 8
  262. 8
  263. 8
  264. 8
  265. 8
  266. 8
  267. 8
  268. 8
  269. 8
  270. 8
  271. 8
  272. 8
  273. 8
  274. 8
  275. 8
  276. 8
  277. 8
  278. 8
  279. 8
  280. 8
  281. 7
  282. 7
  283. 7
  284. 7
  285. 7
  286. 7
  287. 7
  288. 7
  289. 7
  290. 7
  291. 7
  292. 7
  293. 7
  294. 7
  295. 7
  296. 7
  297. 7
  298. 7
  299. 7
  300. 7
  301. 7
  302. 7
  303. 7
  304. 7
  305. 7
  306. 7
  307. 7
  308. 7
  309. 7
  310. 7
  311. 6
  312. 6
  313. 6
  314. 6
  315. 6
  316. 6
  317. 6
  318. 6
  319. 6
  320. 6
  321. 6
  322. 6
  323. 6
  324. 6
  325. 6
  326. 6
  327. 6
  328. 6
  329. 6
  330. 6
  331. 6
  332. 6
  333. 6
  334. 6
  335. 6
  336. 6
  337. 6
  338. 6
  339. 6
  340. 6
  341. 6
  342. 6
  343. 6
  344. 6
  345. 6
  346. 6
  347. 6
  348. 6
  349. 6
  350. 6
  351. 6
  352. 6
  353. 6
  354. 6
  355. 6
  356. 6
  357. 6
  358. 6
  359. 6
  360. 6
  361. 5
  362. 5
  363. 5
  364. 5
  365. 5
  366. 5
  367. 5
  368. 5
  369. 5
  370. 5
  371. 5
  372. 5
  373. 5
  374. 5
  375. 5
  376. 5
  377. 5
  378. 5
  379. 5
  380. 5
  381. 5
  382. 5
  383. 5
  384. 5
  385. 5
  386. 5
  387. 5
  388. 5
  389. 5
  390. 5
  391. 5
  392. 5
  393. 5
  394. 5
  395. 5
  396. 5
  397. 5
  398. 5
  399. 5
  400. 5
  401. 5
  402. 5
  403. 5
  404. 5
  405. 5
  406. 5
  407. 5
  408. 5
  409. 5
  410. 5
  411. 5
  412. 5
  413. 5
  414. 5
  415. 5
  416. 5
  417. 5
  418. 5
  419. 5
  420. 5
  421. 5
  422. 5
  423. 5
  424. 5
  425. 5
  426. 5
  427. 5
  428. 5
  429. 5
  430. 5
  431. 5
  432. 5
  433. 5
  434. 5
  435. 5
  436. 5
  437. 5
  438. 5
  439. 5
  440. 5
  441. 4
  442. Very long-winded way of ignoring the various stages of winged dinosaurs that did not have the musculoskeletal properties for self-powered slight. There are fossils of many dinosaurs that made a living by riding air currents and simply gliding. Is it too much of a stretch of the imagination to think that a climbing creature with some primitive wing-like structure has a greater chance of survival and reproductive success than some other climbing creature that simply drops like a rock? Gliding squirrels do not have powered flight capabilities, but their mutations benefit them in some way. The reason you do not see every single transitory mutation is due to population dynamics: transitory forms very seldom stick around for too long, especially during times of low population (for example, after the KT extinction event, which killed off the vast majority of bird ancestors). In small populations, a mutation that gives even a modest increase in fitness or survival likelihood very rapidly becomes ubiquitous throughout the population. It thus follows that a small population of birdosaurs that climb trees would quickly adopt pre-wing structures that allow the birdosaurs to survive high falls; individuals with better control of this fall/glide gain a selective advantage by landing on other branches; individuals with lighter bone structures are able to glide further and have a further selective advantage; those able to flap are better at climbing trees; and so on. These transitory states of tree-dwellers are less likely to be fossilized than ground-dwellers simply as a matter of distance from the rock/mud slides. There are a number of simulations that demonstrate the validity of evolutionary concepts (they are fun to explore, if you're into that sort of thing). Quite often, transitory mutations appear and disappear very quickly. This is just what tends to happen in a system with random mutation and non-random selective pressures. I suggest that you do your own research if you actually want an answer to your questions. However, if your intent is to simply say that "God dun it", then no amount of explanation will ever convince you. (Sorry for the delayed response. I did not see this notification until just now >.<)
    4
  443. 4
  444. 4
  445. 4
  446. 4
  447. 4
  448. 4
  449. 4
  450. 4
  451. 4
  452. 4
  453. 4
  454. 4
  455. 4
  456. 4
  457. 4
  458. 4
  459. 4
  460. 4
  461. 4
  462. 4
  463. 4
  464. 4
  465. 4
  466. 4
  467. 4
  468. 4
  469. 4
  470. 4
  471. 4
  472. 4
  473. 4
  474. 4
  475. 4
  476. 4
  477. 4
  478. 4
  479. 4
  480. 4
  481. 4
  482. 4
  483. 4
  484. 4
  485. 4
  486. 4
  487. 4
  488. 4
  489. 4
  490. 4
  491. 4
  492. 4
  493. 4
  494. 4
  495. 4
  496. 4
  497. 4
  498. 4
  499. 4
  500. 4
  501. 4
  502. 4
  503. 4
  504. 4
  505. 4
  506. 4
  507. 4
  508. 4
  509. 4
  510. 4
  511. 4
  512. 4
  513. 4
  514. 4
  515. 4
  516. 4
  517. 4
  518. 4
  519. 4
  520. 4
  521. 4
  522. 4
  523. 4
  524. 4
  525. 4
  526. 4
  527. 4
  528. 4
  529. 4
  530. 4
  531. 4
  532. 4
  533. 4
  534. 4
  535. 4
  536. 4
  537. 4
  538. 4
  539. 4
  540. 4
  541. 4
  542. 4
  543. 4
  544. 4
  545. 4
  546. 4
  547. 4
  548. 4
  549. 4
  550. 4
  551. 4
  552. 4
  553. 4
  554. 4
  555. 4
  556. 4
  557. 4
  558. 4
  559. 4
  560. 3
  561. 3
  562. 3
  563. 3
  564. 3
  565. 3
  566. 3
  567. 3
  568. 3
  569. 3
  570. 3
  571. 3
  572. 3
  573. 3
  574. 3
  575. 3
  576. 3
  577. 3
  578. 3
  579. 3
  580. 3
  581. 3
  582. 3
  583. 3
  584. 3
  585. 3
  586. 3
  587. 3
  588. 3
  589. 3
  590. 3
  591. 3
  592. 3
  593. 3
  594. 3
  595. 3
  596. 3
  597. 3
  598. 3
  599. 3
  600. 3
  601. 3
  602. 3
  603. 3
  604. 3
  605. 3
  606. 3
  607. 3
  608. 3
  609. 3
  610. 3
  611. 3
  612. 3
  613. 3
  614. 3
  615. 3
  616. 3
  617. 3
  618. 3
  619. 3
  620. 3
  621. 3
  622. 3
  623. 3
  624. 3
  625. 3
  626. 3
  627. 3
  628. 3
  629. 3
  630. 3
  631. 3
  632. 3
  633. 3
  634. 3
  635. 3
  636. 3
  637. 3
  638. 3
  639. 3
  640. 3
  641. 3
  642. 3
  643. 3
  644. 3
  645. 3
  646. 3
  647. 3
  648. 3
  649. 3
  650. 3
  651. 3
  652. 3
  653. 3
  654. 3
  655. 3
  656. 3
  657. 3
  658. 3
  659. 3
  660. 3
  661. 3
  662. 3
  663. The most ludicrous and idiotic lie put forth in this video is that internet companies like Netflix were ever customers of these ISPs to begin with. Netflix pays the operators of higher-tier networks for bandwidth, e.g. Cogent and Level3, and these network operators have peering agreements with other networks so that data can flow between them efficiently and uninhibited. The ISPs that charge consumers for access then decided to blackmail companies that did not even use their services by breeching their peering agreements and blocking traffic to the ISPs' customer bases. Comcast purports to provide an internet connectivity service to their customers, which Netflix was not, so specifically blocking access to Netflix through peered networks in an attempt to boost sales of their own competing cable service is blatantly monopolistic. If Comcast's network and peering interconnects were insufficient to provide the service they sold, they should have simply upgraded their equipment and fulfilled their obligations to their customers. But because ISPs are already monopolies/oligopolies, they are able to extort arbitrarily-targeted companies and hold customers, who have no other choices, hostage. This is nothing like electric utilities; it is more analogous to a railroad monopoly cutting off access to a city to extort the citizens of that city for access to shipments for which transport costs had already been paid. It is like double taxation. Net neutrality was intended to enforce peering agreements and prevent these ISPs from arbitrarily blackmailing companies and throttling the traffic that was already paid for by the ISPs' customers.
    3
  664. 3
  665. 3
  666. 3
  667. 3
  668. 3
  669. 3
  670. 3
  671. 3
  672. 3
  673. 3
  674. 3
  675. 3
  676. 3
  677. 3
  678. 3
  679. 3
  680. 3
  681. 3
  682. 3
  683. 3
  684. 3
  685. 3
  686. 3
  687. 3
  688. 3
  689. 3
  690. 3
  691. 3
  692. 3
  693. 3
  694. 3
  695. 3
  696. 3
  697. 3
  698. 3
  699. 3
  700. 3
  701. 3
  702. 3
  703. 3
  704. 3
  705. 3
  706. 3
  707. 3
  708. 3
  709. 3
  710. 3
  711. 3
  712. 3
  713. 3
  714. 3
  715. 3
  716. 3
  717. 3
  718. 3
  719. 3
  720. 3
  721. 3
  722. 3
  723. 3
  724. 3
  725. 3
  726. 3
  727. 3
  728. 3
  729. 3
  730. 3
  731. 3
  732. 3
  733. 3
  734. 3
  735. 3
  736. 3
  737. 3
  738. 3
  739. 3
  740. 3
  741. 3
  742. 3
  743. 3
  744. 3
  745. 3
  746. 3
  747. 3
  748. 3
  749. 3
  750. 3
  751. 3
  752. 3
  753. 3
  754. 3
  755. 3
  756. 3
  757. 3
  758. 3
  759. 3
  760. 3
  761. 3
  762. 3
  763. 3
  764. 3
  765. 3
  766. 3
  767. 3
  768. 3
  769. 3
  770. ​ @Little.R  "Lucifer" is the Latin word for "morning star" found in the Vulgate. It is technically a translation of the Greek "Phosphoros", itself a translation of the Hebrew "Helel ben Shahar" from Isaiah, which means something like "shining one, son of the morning"; it was an epithet given to the king of Babylon, but Christians interpret it as meaning "Satan" because the verse in question describes Helel ben Shahar as "fallen from heaven". The idea of the "fallen" has also been twisted from its origins: originally, the "fallen" were the honored dead heroes, those who fell in battle. These are the Rephaim from Canaanite mythology, who were described as having feathered wings similar to the description of Christian angels. As chthonic beings, they were also celestial beings, as what is under the Earth during the day is above it during the night, so to become one of the fallen Rephaim was to become elevated to the heavens. In the Hebrew stories they were called the Nephilim, which also means "fallen". However, the Semitic stories painted these beings as evil since they were the great Canaanite heroes who fell in battle fighting off the invading Israelites. How can the Christ and the father of the anti-Christ both have the same moniker? Since Christianity is a confused amalgamation of pagan and Semitic myths, it is not surprising that it would contain such a confusing contradiction. A reasonable apology for this contradiction is that Jesus' spirit descended from heaven when he was incarnated while Satan was cast out of heaven during the rebellion, so in a sense they both fit the description of the "shining one, son of the morning" who fell/descended from heaven, though it is still very strange to describe supposedly opposite beings identically. I recommend the book "Lucifer: Princeps" by Peter Gray for an in-depth exegesis on the topic.
    3
  771. 3
  772. 3
  773. 3
  774. 3
  775. 3
  776. 3
  777. 3
  778. 3
  779. 3
  780. 3
  781. 3
  782. 3
  783. 3
  784. 3
  785. 3
  786. 3
  787. 3
  788. 3
  789. 3
  790. 3
  791. 3
  792. 3
  793. 3
  794. 3
  795. 3
  796. 3
  797. 3
  798. 3
  799. 3
  800. 3
  801. 3
  802. 3
  803. 3
  804. 3
  805. 3
  806. 3
  807. 3
  808. 3
  809. 3
  810. 3
  811. 3
  812. 3
  813. 3
  814. 3
  815. 3
  816. 3
  817. 3
  818. 3
  819. 3
  820. 3
  821. 3
  822. 3
  823. 3
  824. 3
  825. 3
  826. 3
  827. 3
  828. 3
  829. 2
  830. 2
  831. 2
  832. 2
  833. 2
  834. 2
  835. 2
  836. 2
  837. 2
  838. 2
  839. 2
  840. 2
  841. 2
  842. 2
  843. 2
  844. 2
  845. 2
  846. 2
  847. 2
  848. 2
  849. 2
  850. 2
  851. 2
  852. 2
  853. 2
  854. 2
  855. 2
  856. 2
  857. 2
  858. 2
  859. 2
  860. 2
  861. 2
  862. 2
  863. 2
  864. 2
  865. 2
  866. 2
  867. 2
  868. 2
  869. 2
  870. 2
  871. 2
  872. 2
  873. 2
  874. 2
  875. 2
  876. 2
  877. 2
  878. 2
  879. 2
  880. 2
  881. 2
  882. 2
  883. 2
  884. 2
  885. 2
  886. 2
  887. 2
  888. 2
  889. 2
  890. 2
  891. 2
  892. 2
  893. 2
  894. 2
  895. 2
  896. 2
  897. 2
  898. 2
  899. 2
  900. 2
  901. 2
  902. 2
  903. 2
  904. 2
  905. 2
  906. 2
  907. 2
  908. 2
  909. 2
  910. 2
  911. 2
  912. 2
  913. 2
  914. 2
  915. 2
  916. 2
  917. 2
  918. 2
  919. 2
  920. 2
  921. 2
  922. 2
  923. 2
  924. 2
  925. 2
  926. 2
  927. 2
  928. 2
  929. 2
  930. 2
  931. 2
  932. 2
  933. 2
  934. 2
  935. 2
  936. 2
  937. 2
  938. 2
  939. 2
  940. 2
  941. 2
  942. 2
  943. 2
  944. 2
  945. 2
  946. 2
  947. 2
  948. 2
  949. 2
  950. 2
  951. 2
  952. 2
  953. 2
  954. 2
  955. 2
  956. 2
  957. 2
  958. 2
  959. 2
  960. 2
  961. 2
  962. 2
  963. 2
  964. 2
  965. 2
  966. 2
  967. 2
  968. 2
  969. 2
  970. 2
  971. 2
  972. 2
  973. 2
  974. 2
  975. 2
  976. 2
  977. 2
  978. 2
  979. 2
  980. 2
  981. 2
  982. 2
  983. 2
  984. 2
  985. 2
  986. 2
  987. 2
  988. 2
  989. 2
  990. 2
  991. 2
  992. 2
  993. 2
  994. 2
  995. 2
  996. 2
  997. 2
  998. 2
  999. 2
  1000. 2
  1001. 2
  1002. 2
  1003. 2
  1004. 2
  1005. 2
  1006. 2
  1007. 2
  1008. 2
  1009. 2
  1010. 2
  1011. 2
  1012. 2
  1013. 2
  1014. 2
  1015. 2
  1016. 2
  1017. 2
  1018. 2
  1019. 2
  1020. 2
  1021. 2
  1022. 2
  1023. 2
  1024. 2
  1025. 2
  1026. 2
  1027. 2
  1028. 2
  1029. 2
  1030. 2
  1031. 2
  1032. 2
  1033. 2
  1034. 2
  1035. 2
  1036. 2
  1037. 2
  1038. 2
  1039. 2
  1040. 2
  1041. 2
  1042. 2
  1043. 2
  1044. 2
  1045. 2
  1046. 2
  1047. 2
  1048. 2
  1049. 2
  1050. 2
  1051. 2
  1052. 2
  1053. 2
  1054. 2
  1055. 2
  1056. 2
  1057. 2
  1058. 2
  1059. 2
  1060. 2
  1061. 2
  1062. 2
  1063. 2
  1064. 2
  1065. 2
  1066. 2
  1067. 2
  1068. 2
  1069. 2
  1070. 2
  1071. 2
  1072. 2
  1073. 2
  1074. 2
  1075. 2
  1076. 2
  1077. 2
  1078. 2
  1079. 2
  1080. 2
  1081. 2
  1082. 2
  1083. 2
  1084. 2
  1085. 2
  1086. 2
  1087. 2
  1088. 2
  1089. 2
  1090. 2
  1091. 2
  1092. 2
  1093. 2
  1094. 2
  1095. 2
  1096. 2
  1097. 2
  1098. 2
  1099. 2
  1100. 2
  1101. 2
  1102. 2
  1103. 2
  1104. 2
  1105. 2
  1106. 2
  1107. 2
  1108. 2
  1109. 2
  1110. 2
  1111. 2
  1112. 2
  1113. 2
  1114. 2
  1115. 2
  1116. 2
  1117. 2
  1118. 2
  1119. 2
  1120. 2
  1121. 2
  1122. 2
  1123. 2
  1124. 2
  1125. 2
  1126. 2
  1127. 2
  1128. 2
  1129. 2
  1130. 2
  1131. 2
  1132. 2
  1133. 2
  1134. 2
  1135. 2
  1136. 2
  1137. 2
  1138. 2
  1139. 2
  1140. 2
  1141. 2
  1142. 2
  1143. 2
  1144. 2
  1145. 2
  1146. 2
  1147. 2
  1148. 2
  1149. 2
  1150. 2
  1151. 2
  1152. 2
  1153. 2
  1154. 2
  1155. 2
  1156. 2
  1157. 2
  1158. 2
  1159. 2
  1160. 2
  1161. 2
  1162. 2
  1163. 2
  1164. 2
  1165. 2
  1166. 2
  1167. 2
  1168. 2
  1169. 2
  1170. 2
  1171. 2
  1172. 2
  1173. 2
  1174. 2
  1175. 2
  1176. 2
  1177. 2
  1178. 2
  1179. 2
  1180. 2
  1181. 2
  1182. 2
  1183. 2
  1184. 2
  1185. 2
  1186. 2
  1187. 2
  1188. 2
  1189. 2
  1190. 2
  1191. 2
  1192. 2
  1193. 2
  1194. 2
  1195. 2
  1196. 2
  1197. 2
  1198. 2
  1199. 2
  1200. 2
  1201. 2
  1202. 2
  1203. 2
  1204. 2
  1205. 2
  1206. 2
  1207. 2
  1208. 2
  1209. 2
  1210. 2
  1211. 2
  1212. 2
  1213. 2
  1214. 2
  1215. 2
  1216. 2
  1217. 2
  1218. 2
  1219. 2
  1220. 2
  1221. 2
  1222. 2
  1223. 2
  1224. 2
  1225. 2
  1226. 2
  1227. 2
  1228. 2
  1229. 2
  1230. 2
  1231. 2
  1232. 2
  1233. 2
  1234. 2
  1235. 2
  1236. 2
  1237. 2
  1238. 2
  1239. The evidence from NDEs seems to verify the idea of Baphomet: after death, your mind/soul/life force is drawn toward and dissolves into Baphomet; as life begins, your mind is formed from parts of Baphomet. Reincarnation thus does not guarantee continuity of individuals, though there seem to be ways to bypass the solve et coagula process. There are at least six minds that comprise the human soul, 3 in each brain hemisphere: the exalting/human mind (cerebral cortex, higher level functioning), the normal/mammalian waking consciousness, and the unconscious/reptilian mind. (It would not surprise me if the mind colony included a different mind for every anatomically/ontologically unique part of the brain -- indeed, the ancient Germanic heathens believed in separate aspects of mind each having their own fate after death -- but adding complexity to the model may impede progress toward a good enough result.) We know from empirical observational studies of epilepsy patients who undergo corpus callostomy that each hemisphere can function independently with differing personalities, so the panpsychic, Baphometic concept of natural reincarnation makes a lot of sense. (Are you any more or less "you" if your hemispheres are severed, revealing two distinct minds?) If such a model is correct, then reincarnation with an intact personality could be achieved by two different methods: 1) dissolve into Baphomet with a strong, magickally enforced intent to then entirely recoagulate thereafter, perhaps gaining some insight or power in the process; 2) remain separate from Baphomet (e.g. enter your own purgatory) until a new host body can be acquired. Both would require first finding an adequate harmony in the mind organism, i.e. achieving the gnostic state of the True Will, and I imagine that experience with Baphometic invocations may be instrumental for achieving the first path. However, the goal in such a working should be to further advance experience and development, else the universe may find your unnatural schemes too much to permit.
    2
  1240. 2
  1241. 2
  1242. 2
  1243. 2
  1244. 2
  1245. 2
  1246. 2
  1247. 2
  1248. 2
  1249. 2
  1250. 2
  1251. 2
  1252. 2
  1253. 2
  1254. 2
  1255. 2
  1256. 2
  1257. 2
  1258. 2
  1259. 2
  1260. 2
  1261. 2
  1262. 2
  1263. 2
  1264. 2
  1265. 2
  1266. 2
  1267. 2
  1268. 2
  1269. 2
  1270. 2
  1271. 2
  1272. 2
  1273. 2
  1274. 2
  1275. 2
  1276. 2
  1277. 2
  1278. 2
  1279. 2
  1280. 2
  1281. 2
  1282. 2
  1283. 2
  1284. 2
  1285. 2
  1286. 2
  1287. 2
  1288. 2
  1289. 2
  1290. 2
  1291. 2
  1292. 2
  1293. 2
  1294. 2
  1295. 2
  1296. 2
  1297. 2
  1298. 2
  1299. 2
  1300. 2
  1301. 2
  1302. 2
  1303. 2
  1304. 2
  1305. 2
  1306. 2
  1307. 2
  1308. 2
  1309. 2
  1310. 2
  1311. 2
  1312. 2
  1313. 2
  1314. 2
  1315. 2
  1316. 2
  1317. 2
  1318. 2
  1319. 2
  1320. 2
  1321. 2
  1322. 2
  1323. 2
  1324. 2
  1325. 2
  1326. 2
  1327. 2
  1328. 2
  1329. 2
  1330. 2
  1331. 2
  1332. For sure, Trump is better on balance than any president I have seen in my lifetime. But let's not forget that there are real problems in our society -- the leftists might be crazy and psychotic now, but the left-wing activists had some legitimate grievances before being subverted by communists. In particular, they are right about the wealth inequality being a problem, but they misdiagnose it as being a flaw of capitalism rather than a flaw of the central banking debt slavery model. The problems are twofold: the fractional reserve system creates instability (the credit cycle), and the Cantillion effect enriches those closest to newly created debt-money at the expense of those furthest away. These can be solved by 1) banning fractional reserve lending and 2) adopting a framework in which the People issue their own currency, ensuring that the Cantillion effect is negated. (In my model, one signatory per household issues currency into a currency co-op on behalf of the household; the co-op elects a secretary, a treasurer, and a board of governors to enforce contract terms and make sure the paperwork is proper. I included a 5 year note expiration system for replacing lost notes automatically and making sure the money supply is adequate for representing the productive capacity. I'm still unsure how to structure an adequate price discovery mechanism, but I suspect a multi-round silent auction system where each bid/ask match has 10% chance of assignment would work reasonably well.) And everyone is correct when they say our system is corrupt, but that is also misdiagnosed as being caused by shady campaign finance; the real issue is that first-past-the-post is the worst voting method in all but one specific scenario (the 100% strategic voting scenario for the Borda count) and it relies upon polarization and partisanship to drive turn out. The solution is rather simple: replace FPTP with score voting, which elects consensus candidates regardless of campaign bullshit; voter turnout is also driven by strong consensus candidates rather than polarization. Bees have been using a form of score voting as a consensus mechanism for tens of millions of years, and it works very well for them; humanity would do well to take inspiration from nature.
    2
  1333. 2
  1334. 2
  1335. 2
  1336. 2
  1337. 2
  1338.  @NoBoilerplate  I'll check out that video. I write primarily typed Python, use pre-conditions and sometimes post-conditions, and use a test- and specification-driven development cycle, so I don't worry much about things being broken. And like I said, the idea of my code being clean and beautiful is reinforced by feedback I have gotten from others who have perused it, so the assertion that nobody will agree with my definition of beauty in this case is false. Maybe there is an argument to be made that Rust development saves time on writing pre- and post-conditions, but whether that offsets the time commitment to learning a new language when I'm already proficient in the three or four that I regularly use is an open question. I can appreciate that there is beauty in that Rust example, at least conceptually, but I wouldn't call it "objectively beautiful" since there is no such thing. Whether or not it is aesthetically appealing also depends upon the surrounding code in my opinion -- part of what makes my code clean is that I use standardized forms that are easy on the eyes (pep8 with my own subjective flare). The ".collect::<Vec<i32>>();" to my eyes does not look particularly clean and beautiful -- it looks like someone copied and pasted html and JavaScript in a confused and haphazard way, but that could be my web dev background coloring my perspective. I also found Java code distasteful for the same reason. Angle brackets are just ugly unless padded with whitespace, and they only make sense as comparison operators in that case.
    2
  1339. 2
  1340. 2
  1341. 2
  1342. 2
  1343. 2
  1344. 2
  1345. 2
  1346. 2
  1347. 2
  1348. 2
  1349. 2
  1350. 2
  1351. 2
  1352. 2
  1353. 2
  1354. I got a degree in biotechnology because they offered me enough scholarships to turn a small profit after paying dorm rent, tuition, and fees. I took a software development course in Java one semester as an elective for fun after convincing the head of the computer science department (the professor for the class) to wave the prerequisites. There was a class project (which counted as the final exam iirc) to make a simple photo editor where you made shapes and dragged them around in layers, and we had to present our plans to the class for how we would complete the project the week after partners were assigned; as the lucky odd-one-out working solo, my presentation was the log of what I actually did + a live demo because I got the whole project done the day it was assigned. I had not used Java before that class but had a blast figuring it all out and somehow building a bug-free application that met all the requirements and bonus points without unit tests. Software engineering is a unique profession in this regard: there was no feasible way to do additional experimentation to further my knowledge and professional skills in biotech, but anyone can do any type of software development exercises/experiments they want to. (Biotech was a damnably difficult and inflexible degree to obtain -- the majority of the associates of arts degree I got in highschool did not count, and certain classes were only offered once a year rather than once a semester, so I and others in my situation ended up spending a whole 4 years getting the degree -- but there were some cool fellow honors program weirdos in that degree program, and I graduated magna cum laude before getting too burnt out, so it was on the whole not terrible.)
    2
  1355. 2
  1356. 2
  1357. 2
  1358. 2
  1359. 2
  1360. 2
  1361. 2
  1362. 2
  1363. 2
  1364. 2
  1365. 2
  1366. 2
  1367. 2
  1368. 2
  1369. 2
  1370. 2
  1371. 2
  1372. 2
  1373. 2
  1374. 2
  1375. 2
  1376. 2
  1377. 2
  1378. 2
  1379. 2
  1380. 2
  1381. 2
  1382. 2
  1383. 2
  1384. 2
  1385. 2
  1386. 2
  1387. 2
  1388. 2
  1389. 2
  1390. 2
  1391. 2
  1392. 2
  1393. 2
  1394. 2
  1395. 2
  1396. 2
  1397. 2
  1398. 2
  1399. 2
  1400. 2
  1401. 2
  1402. 2
  1403. 2
  1404. 2
  1405. 2
  1406. 2
  1407. 2
  1408. 2
  1409. 2
  1410. 2
  1411. 2
  1412. 2
  1413. 2
  1414. 2
  1415. 2
  1416. 2
  1417. 2
  1418. 2
  1419. 2
  1420. 2
  1421. 2
  1422. 2
  1423. 2
  1424. 2
  1425. 2
  1426. 2
  1427. 2
  1428. 2
  1429. One of the problems with defending against anti-personnel FPVs is that they are very small, so they are hard to detect. Another problem is that they move very quickly, so it is hard for a human to acquire a target and hold an accurate aim to engage the FPV before it can carry out its mission -- and even if soldiers can be trained to be effective in this technique, or perhaps delegate it to a specialist who is highly trained and capable, many anti-personnel FPVs simply hover several hundred feet directly above soldiers and drop small ordinance on them. The Germans are developing (or may already have developed) defenses against anti-vehicle FPVs and to equip their most modern tanks and APCs, but those FPVs are larger, somewhat less agile, and easier to spot. The German system is like a Claymore mine on a swivel that pops out when a target is detected and explodes in the general direction of the approaching drone. The Ukrainian armed forces are using their own small FPVs to successfully defend against fixed-wing, autopiloted drones intended for engaging stationary targets (e.g. the Shahed). I suspect that a workable solution for defending against anti-personnel FPVs will be some sort of small robotic device that is either set up in a fortified position or goes ahead of, behind, and flanking troops on a tracked vehicle chassis. It would have to have the ability to detect radio frequencies used by FPVs for a proximity alert (which will not work against FPVs using thin fiber optic cables); high resolution cameras pointed up and all around to find possible enemy FPVs before they make their attack approach; high speed cameras with target tracking and prediction algorithms to aim at approaching FPVs; laser range finders to accurately determine distance to the target; an autoloading cylinder (no choke) or even slightly rifled (for better spread) shotgun turret to take out attacking FPVs of the sort that dive straight in; and either a full choke autoloading shotgun to engage the high hovering bomber FPVs or its own anti-drone drones to send up and joist. For the anti-drone drone method, something very small, cheap, fast, and relatively simple would have to be made, perhaps one that is primarily guided by the base unit and triggers a small plastic BB shrapnel charge when it gets within a meter of the target. If miniature chemical rockets could be made to work reliably in this scenario, then inertial guidance (or even perhaps no guidance) might be good enough -- say something not much bigger than a large firework rocket that either triggers the proximity sensor or self-destructs after reaching apogee for safety (to avoid falling back and triggering the proximity sensor on soldiers' heads); fire a salvo of 4-6 in quick succession to surround the enemy drone and prevent it from escaping; have 3-6 salvos ready.
    2
  1430. 2
  1431. 2
  1432. 2
  1433. 2
  1434. 2
  1435. 2
  1436. 2
  1437. 2
  1438. 2
  1439. 2
  1440. 2
  1441. 2
  1442. 2
  1443. 2
  1444. 2
  1445. 2
  1446. 2
  1447. 2
  1448. 2
  1449. 2
  1450. 2
  1451. 2
  1452. 2
  1453. 2
  1454. 2
  1455. 2
  1456. 2
  1457. 2
  1458. 2
  1459. 2
  1460. 2
  1461. 2
  1462. 2
  1463. 2
  1464. 2
  1465. 2
  1466. 2
  1467. 2
  1468. 2
  1469. 2
  1470. 2
  1471. 2
  1472. 2
  1473. 2
  1474. 2
  1475. 2
  1476. 2
  1477. 2
  1478. 2
  1479. 2
  1480. 2
  1481. 1
  1482. 1
  1483. 1
  1484. 1
  1485. 1
  1486. 1
  1487. 1
  1488. 1
  1489. 1
  1490. 1
  1491. 1
  1492. 1
  1493. 1
  1494. 1
  1495. 1
  1496. 1
  1497. 1
  1498. 1
  1499. 1
  1500. 1
  1501. 1
  1502. 1
  1503. 1
  1504. 1
  1505. 1
  1506. 1
  1507. 1
  1508. 1
  1509. 1
  1510. 1
  1511. 1
  1512. 1
  1513. 1
  1514. 1
  1515. 1
  1516. 1
  1517. 1
  1518. 1
  1519. 1
  1520. 1
  1521. 1
  1522. 1
  1523. 1
  1524. 1
  1525. 1
  1526. 1
  1527. 1
  1528. 1
  1529. 1
  1530. 1
  1531. 1
  1532. 1
  1533. 1
  1534. 1
  1535. 1
  1536. 1
  1537. 1
  1538. 1
  1539. 1
  1540. Walter White If you're not a formally trained scientist, you are not qualified to make statements about science. Similarly, if you're not formally trained to perform heart surgery, you are not qualified to open someone's chest. The commonality is that being a scientist and being a heart surgeon are professional careers. If you aren't trained in a certain profession, then your conclusions on topics within those professions have very little relevance and will not be taken seriously. No matter how many times you say "fact", it will not give your nonsense any more validity. Your sources are shit, so you resort to just spamming the word "fact". Wanna see a real fact? http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v2/n9/full/nclimate1542.html And it's a pretty sad fact: scientific discoveries and data are not reaching the public effectively because media sucks. If you're a scientist, you can read the full article for free because your institution has a department-wide subscription; if you're not, pay the journal to get access. It's a real problem. Discussions like ours would likely be avoided if everyone had free access to all research that has been done in every field. But the masses have to wait for highly revised, shoddy summaries from mediocre writers and 3 word headlines. It's a very serious problem that is gaining a lot of attention in the scientific community; hopefully we can solve it soon. I don't blame you for your ignorance. I just want you to realize that you know far less than you suspect--and that you shouldn't draw conclusions from anecdotal commentary or media hysteria. There are too many data that you have not examined, and you are cheating yourself by trying to conclude definitive truths about the world without first examining them.
    1
  1541. 1
  1542. Walter White "Lies, damned lies, and statistics." "Figures don't lie, but liars figure." I am reading these to see who was actually misrepresenting the data: the scientists (who went through years of training to measure and interpret data professionally) or the journalist (who reads blogs and writes comments professionally). Concerning the first article: As an interesting point, Booker specifically claims that neither asbestos nor second hand smoke pose health significant hazards, which calls into question his particular biases. Booker's only citation in that article ("The fiddling with temperature data...") was a link to a previous article that he wrote ("Climategate, the sequel.."), which then cites a blog post. That blog post links to some NASA graphs and says "look at inconsistency". So, check this out. http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/FAQ.html#q216 The blog post Booker cites frequently misuses the term "raw data". What he did not take into account was that the data was never "raw" to begin with. Many weather stations changed their sensor locations from inside cities to the countryside over the past few decades, and cities tend to be warmer than the countryside (I don't think anyone would argue that point). So, in an attempt to normalize the data from these stations after a location change, several algorithms were developed. Flaws were found in the original algorithm, so an update was made. The one thing that NASA did not do that this blogger did was cherry pick the data sets. The general, global trend did not substantially change between algorithm versions; the change had the opposite effect on many other station record sets. Normalization of data is a very complex subject; it is easy to mislead the ignorant by using word like "raw" and "adjusted" when, in reality, both sets of data were "adjusted"--just with different methodologies.
    1
  1543. Concerning the climatedepot article: Before reading the article, I looked into the organization behind that blog. (I also looked into the Telegraph a bit, and I found it was owned by the Barclay Brothers. Not entirely sure what to think of them, since I am unaware of any financial holdings that would sway them either way on this subject.) http://www.cfact.org/category/campaigns/ "EPA’s new regulations would kill America’s abundant supply of affordable coal energy based entirely on over-hyped global warming junk science." Seems like a fair, unbiased, and uncharged statement of fact, eh? Some fun facts about their funding: http://www.scaife.com/sarah2011.pdf (page 2) http://www.scaife.com/sarah12.pdf (page 5) http://www.scaife.com/sarah13.pdf (page 5) CFACT gets a lot of funding from the Sarah Scaife Foundation, which was founded by a man who inherited millions of dollars in oil assets (it is now run by his children). This is akin to a politician taking campaign funding from the Koch Brothers; it is an obvious source of financial interest that biases everything they do and say. I think I've sufficiently discredited that source. But anyway, concerning the article itself (if you can even call it an article): It links to the Telegraph article I've already addressed and Fox News. Because Fox News is a respectable source of [dis]information. It also links to another post on its website that links to breitbart.com, which lacks an "about us" page and displays a very clear radical right-wing bias (and their comments are filled with even more swill than youtube and reddit). I think that's an adequate consideration of that climatedepot page.
    1
  1544. 1
  1545. 1
  1546. 1
  1547. 1
  1548. 1
  1549. 1
  1550. 1
  1551. 1
  1552. 1
  1553. 1
  1554. 1
  1555. 1
  1556. 1
  1557. 1
  1558. 1
  1559. 1
  1560. 1
  1561. 1
  1562. 1
  1563. 1
  1564. 1
  1565. 1
  1566. 1
  1567. 1
  1568. 1
  1569. 1
  1570. 1
  1571. 1
  1572. 1
  1573. 1
  1574. 1
  1575. 1
  1576. 1
  1577. 1
  1578. 1
  1579. 1
  1580. 1
  1581. 1
  1582. 1
  1583. 1
  1584. 1
  1585. 1
  1586. 1
  1587. 1
  1588. 1
  1589. 1
  1590. 1
  1591. 1
  1592. 1
  1593. 1
  1594. 1
  1595. 1
  1596. 1
  1597. 1
  1598. 1
  1599. 1
  1600. 1
  1601. 1
  1602. 1
  1603. 1
  1604. 1
  1605. 1
  1606. Any time I hear someone repeat the simplistic lie about Jan 6, I know they haven't looked into it or viewed the evidence themselves and cannot be relied upon. I watched hours of footage from the event from many sources to figure it out for myself. Jan 6 was clearly instigated by federal agents, and the riot began before Trump had even finished his speech a mile away -- the people who attended the rally did not start the riot, which runs counter to the absurd claim that "we know what happens when Trump tells his people to march on the capital". (Hell, most of them were seen smiling, waving, and walking peacefully where they were directed by security before leaving and being charged with trespassing. The lunatics who went into Pelosi's office, etc were a different matter and deserved prosecution.) Known FBI informants were caught on camera instigating the day prior, and guys with black ear pieces went around cutting fences and directing the crowd to "move forward" on the day of the riot. The FBI has refused to cooperate with investigators or give an accounting of how their assets engaged in the events of the riot. We know about how the disgraced Peter Strozk and his group of conspirators subverted the FBI for political purposes, so it is not surprising that malefactors within the agency would do such a thing -- the regime media mouthpieces have been retelling the official propaganda narrative ever since, so they clearly got a lot of utility out of the ordeal. (See also the CIA paper "Managing a Nightmare: CIA Public Affairs and the Drug Conspiracy Story" about how they used US media to destroy the career of journalist Gary Webb who broke the story about the CIA's complicity in Contra drug smuggling and thereby ran a massive PR cover-up.)
    1
  1607. 1
  1608. 1
  1609. 1
  1610. 1
  1611. 1
  1612. 1
  1613. 1
  1614. 1
  1615. 1
  1616. 1
  1617. 1
  1618. 1
  1619. 1
  1620. 1
  1621. 1
  1622. 1
  1623. 1
  1624. 1
  1625. 1
  1626. 1
  1627. 1
  1628. 1
  1629. 1
  1630. 1
  1631. 1
  1632. 1
  1633. 1
  1634. 1
  1635. 1
  1636. 1
  1637. 1
  1638. 1
  1639. 1
  1640. 1
  1641. 1
  1642. 1
  1643. 1
  1644. 1
  1645. 1
  1646. 1
  1647. 1
  1648. 1
  1649. 1
  1650. 1
  1651. 1
  1652. 1
  1653. 1
  1654. 1
  1655. 1
  1656. 1
  1657. 1
  1658. 1
  1659. 1
  1660. 1
  1661. 1
  1662. 1
  1663. 1
  1664. 1
  1665. 1
  1666. 1
  1667. 1
  1668. 1
  1669. 1
  1670. 1
  1671. 1
  1672. 1
  1673. 1
  1674. 1
  1675. 1
  1676. 1
  1677. 1
  1678. 1
  1679. 1
  1680. 1
  1681. 1
  1682. 1
  1683. 1
  1684. 1
  1685. 1
  1686. 1
  1687. 1
  1688. 1
  1689. 1
  1690. 1
  1691. 1
  1692. 1
  1693. 1
  1694. 1
  1695. 1
  1696. 1
  1697. 1
  1698. 1
  1699. 1
  1700. 1
  1701. 1
  1702. 1
  1703. 1
  1704. 1
  1705. 1
  1706. 1
  1707. 1
  1708. 1
  1709. 1
  1710. 1
  1711. 1
  1712. 1
  1713. 1
  1714. 1
  1715. 1
  1716. 1
  1717. 1
  1718. 1
  1719. 1
  1720. 1
  1721. 1
  1722. 1
  1723. 1
  1724. 1
  1725. 1
  1726. 1
  1727. 1
  1728. 1
  1729. 1
  1730. 1
  1731. 1
  1732. 1
  1733. 1
  1734. 1
  1735. 1
  1736. 1
  1737. 1
  1738. 1
  1739. 1
  1740. 1
  1741. 1
  1742. 1
  1743. 1
  1744. 1
  1745. 1
  1746. 1
  1747. 1
  1748. 1
  1749. 1
  1750. 1
  1751. 1
  1752. 1
  1753. 1
  1754. 1
  1755. 1
  1756. 1
  1757. 1
  1758. 1
  1759. 1
  1760. 1
  1761. 1
  1762. 1
  1763. 1
  1764. 1
  1765. 1
  1766. 1
  1767. 1
  1768. 1
  1769. 1
  1770. 1
  1771. 1
  1772. 1
  1773. 1
  1774. 1
  1775. 1
  1776. 1
  1777. 1
  1778. 1
  1779. 1
  1780. 1
  1781. 1
  1782. 1
  1783. 1
  1784. 1
  1785. 1
  1786. 1
  1787. 1
  1788. 1
  1789. 1
  1790. 1
  1791. 1
  1792. 1
  1793. 1
  1794. 1
  1795. 1
  1796. 1
  1797. 1
  1798. 1
  1799. 1
  1800. 1
  1801. 1
  1802. 1
  1803. 1
  1804. 1
  1805. 1
  1806. 1
  1807. 1
  1808. 1
  1809. 1
  1810. 1
  1811. 1
  1812. 1
  1813. 1
  1814. 1
  1815. 1
  1816. 1
  1817. 1
  1818. 1
  1819. 1
  1820. 1
  1821. 1
  1822. 1
  1823. 1
  1824. 1
  1825. 1
  1826. 1
  1827. 1
  1828. 1
  1829. 1
  1830. 1
  1831. 1
  1832. 1
  1833. 1
  1834. 1
  1835. 1
  1836. 1
  1837. 1
  1838. 1
  1839. 1
  1840. 1
  1841. 1
  1842. 1
  1843. 1
  1844. 1
  1845. 1
  1846. 1
  1847. 1
  1848. 1
  1849. 1
  1850. 1
  1851. 1
  1852. 1
  1853. 1
  1854. 1
  1855. 1
  1856. 1
  1857. 1
  1858. 1
  1859. 1
  1860. 1
  1861. 1
  1862. 1
  1863. 1
  1864. 1
  1865. 1
  1866. 1
  1867. 1
  1868. 1
  1869. 1
  1870. 1
  1871. 1
  1872. 1
  1873. 1
  1874. 1
  1875. 1
  1876. 1
  1877. 1
  1878. 1
  1879. 1
  1880. 1
  1881. 1
  1882. 1
  1883. 1
  1884. 1
  1885. 1
  1886. 1
  1887. 1
  1888. 1
  1889. 1
  1890. 1
  1891. 1
  1892. 1
  1893. 1
  1894. 1
  1895. 1
  1896. 1
  1897. 1
  1898. 1
  1899. 1
  1900. 1
  1901. 1
  1902. 1
  1903. 1
  1904. 1
  1905. 1
  1906. 1
  1907. 1
  1908. 1
  1909. 1
  1910. 1
  1911. 1
  1912. 1
  1913. 1
  1914. 1
  1915. 1
  1916. 1
  1917. 1
  1918. 1
  1919. 1
  1920. 1
  1921. 1
  1922. 1
  1923. 1
  1924. 1
  1925. 1
  1926. 1
  1927. 1
  1928. 1
  1929. 1
  1930. 1
  1931. 1
  1932. 1
  1933. 1
  1934. 1
  1935. 1
  1936. 1
  1937. 1
  1938. 1
  1939. 1
  1940. 1
  1941. 1
  1942. 1
  1943. 1
  1944. 1
  1945. 1
  1946. 1
  1947. 1
  1948. 1
  1949. 1
  1950. 1
  1951. 1
  1952. 1
  1953. 1
  1954. 1
  1955. 1
  1956. 1
  1957. 1
  1958. 1
  1959. 1
  1960. 1
  1961. 1
  1962. 1
  1963. 1
  1964. 1
  1965. 1
  1966. 1
  1967. 1
  1968. 1
  1969. 1
  1970. 1
  1971. 1
  1972. 1
  1973. 1
  1974. 1
  1975. 1
  1976. 1
  1977. 1
  1978. 1
  1979. 1
  1980. 1
  1981. 1
  1982. 1
  1983. 1
  1984. 1
  1985. 1
  1986. 1
  1987. 1
  1988. 1
  1989. 1
  1990. 1
  1991. 1
  1992. 1
  1993. 1
  1994. 1
  1995. 1
  1996. 1
  1997. 1
  1998. 1
  1999. 1
  2000. 1
  2001. 1
  2002. 1
  2003. 1
  2004. 1
  2005. 1
  2006. 1
  2007. 1
  2008. 1
  2009. 1
  2010. 1
  2011. 1
  2012. 1
  2013. 1
  2014. 1
  2015. 1
  2016. 1
  2017. 1
  2018. 1
  2019. 1
  2020. 1
  2021. 1
  2022. 1
  2023. 1
  2024. 1
  2025. 1
  2026. 1
  2027. 1
  2028. 1
  2029. 1
  2030. 1
  2031. 1
  2032. 1
  2033. 1
  2034. 1
  2035. 1
  2036. 1
  2037. 1
  2038. 1
  2039. 1
  2040. 1
  2041. 1
  2042. 1
  2043. 1
  2044. 1
  2045. 1
  2046. 1
  2047. 1
  2048. 1
  2049. 1
  2050. 1
  2051. 1
  2052. 1
  2053. 1
  2054. 1
  2055. 1
  2056. 1
  2057. 1
  2058. 1
  2059. 1
  2060. 1
  2061. 1
  2062. 1
  2063. 1
  2064. 1
  2065. 1
  2066. 1
  2067. 1
  2068. 1
  2069. 1
  2070. 1
  2071. 1
  2072. 1
  2073. 1
  2074. 1
  2075. 1
  2076. 1
  2077. 1
  2078. 1
  2079. 1
  2080. 1
  2081. 1
  2082. 1
  2083. 1
  2084. 1
  2085. 1
  2086. 1
  2087. 1
  2088. 1
  2089. 1
  2090. 1
  2091. 1
  2092. 1
  2093. 1
  2094. 1
  2095. 1
  2096. 1
  2097. 1
  2098. 1
  2099. 1
  2100. 1
  2101. 1
  2102. 1
  2103. 1
  2104. 1
  2105. 1
  2106. 1
  2107. 1
  2108. 1
  2109. 1
  2110. 1
  2111. 1
  2112. 1
  2113. 1
  2114. 1
  2115. 1
  2116. 1
  2117. 1
  2118. 1
  2119. 1
  2120. 1
  2121. 1
  2122. 1
  2123. 1
  2124. 1
  2125. 1
  2126. 1
  2127. 1
  2128. 1
  2129. 1
  2130. 1
  2131. 1
  2132. 1
  2133. 1
  2134. 1
  2135. 1
  2136. 1
  2137. 1
  2138. 1
  2139. 1
  2140. 1
  2141. 1
  2142. 1
  2143. 1
  2144. 1
  2145. 1
  2146. 1
  2147. 1
  2148. 1
  2149. 1
  2150. 1
  2151. 1
  2152. 1
  2153. 1
  2154. 1
  2155. 1
  2156. 1
  2157. 1
  2158. 1
  2159. 1
  2160. 1
  2161. 1
  2162. 1
  2163. 1
  2164. 1
  2165. 1
  2166. 1
  2167. 1
  2168. 1
  2169. 1
  2170. 1
  2171. 1
  2172. 1
  2173. 1
  2174. 1
  2175. 1
  2176. 1
  2177. 1
  2178. 1
  2179. 1
  2180. 1
  2181. 1
  2182. 1
  2183. 1
  2184. 1
  2185. 1
  2186. 1
  2187. 1
  2188. 1
  2189. 1
  2190. 1
  2191. 1
  2192. 1
  2193. 1
  2194. 1
  2195. 1
  2196. 1
  2197. 1
  2198. In early March, I had a prophetic dream in which I was in isolation during a natural disaster; though I was somewhat lucid, I did not consciously attempt to change the course of the dream because I wanted to see what the demons were trying to tell me. A few weeks later, I was in a two week isolation due to exposure to what appeared to be covid (the guy I was working with had severe lung inflammation, but the doctors did not have any tests, so they just sent him home with naproxen). While it can be fun to fuck around in lucid dreams, I prefer to not interfere with the natural course of the dream in case there are any prophetic messages being expressed -- in that particular case, the demons communicated a few specific things that I had little difficulty understanding. On the other hand, scrying has, in my experience, been somewhat difficult to interpret but obviously accurate in hind sight (e.g. a symbol for "terror" without any further context the day before the stock market crash). Experimental forms of cartomancy and visions from other gnostic methods have communicated similar themes but have also been difficult to exactly translate -- I have known since February that hard times were imminent, but I could not tell exactly what would happen or when events would transpire -- I suspected it would be covid casualties. Dreams that are prophetic tend to stand out much more strongly and are easier to interpret in my experience, so I do not want to arbitrarily interfere with the process through lucid dreaming techniques.
    1
  2199. 1
  2200. 1
  2201. 1
  2202. 1
  2203. 1
  2204. 1
  2205. 1
  2206. 1
  2207. 1
  2208. 1
  2209. 1
  2210. 1
  2211. 1
  2212. 1
  2213. 1
  2214. 1
  2215. 1
  2216. 1
  2217. 1
  2218. 1
  2219. 1
  2220. 1
  2221. 1
  2222. 1
  2223. 1
  2224. 1
  2225. 1
  2226. 1
  2227. 1
  2228. 1
  2229. 1
  2230. 1
  2231. 1
  2232. 1
  2233. 1
  2234. 1
  2235. 1
  2236. 1
  2237. 1
  2238. 1
  2239. 1
  2240. 1
  2241. 1
  2242. 1
  2243. 1
  2244. 1
  2245. 1
  2246. 1
  2247. 1
  2248. 1
  2249. 1
  2250. 1
  2251. 1
  2252. 1
  2253. 1
  2254. 1
  2255. 1
  2256. 1
  2257. 1
  2258. 1
  2259. 1
  2260. 1
  2261. 1
  2262. 1
  2263. 1
  2264. 1
  2265. 1
  2266. 1
  2267. 1
  2268. 1
  2269. 1
  2270. 1
  2271. 1
  2272. 1
  2273. 1
  2274. 1
  2275. 1
  2276. 1
  2277. 1
  2278. 1
  2279. 1
  2280. 1
  2281. 1
  2282. 1
  2283. 1
  2284. 1
  2285. 1
  2286. 1
  2287. 1
  2288. 1
  2289. 1
  2290. 1
  2291. 1
  2292. 1
  2293. 1
  2294. 1
  2295. 1
  2296. 1
  2297. 1
  2298. 1
  2299. 1
  2300. 1
  2301. 1
  2302. 1
  2303. 1
  2304. 1
  2305. 1
  2306. 1
  2307. 1
  2308. 1
  2309. 1
  2310. 1
  2311. 1
  2312. 1
  2313. 1
  2314. 1
  2315. 1
  2316. 1
  2317. 1
  2318. 1
  2319. 1
  2320. 1
  2321. 1
  2322. 1
  2323. 1
  2324. 1
  2325. 1
  2326. 1
  2327. 1
  2328. 1
  2329. 1
  2330. 1
  2331. 1
  2332. 1
  2333. 1
  2334. 1
  2335. 1
  2336. 1
  2337. 1
  2338. 1
  2339. 1
  2340. 1
  2341. 1
  2342. 1
  2343. 1
  2344. 1
  2345. 1
  2346. 1
  2347. 1
  2348. 1
  2349. 1
  2350. 1
  2351. 1
  2352. 1
  2353. 1
  2354. 1
  2355. 1
  2356. 1
  2357. 1
  2358. 1
  2359. 1
  2360. 1
  2361. 1
  2362. 1
  2363. 1
  2364. 1
  2365. 1
  2366. 1
  2367. 1
  2368. 1
  2369. 1
  2370. 1
  2371. 1
  2372. 1
  2373. 1
  2374. 1
  2375. 1
  2376. 1
  2377. 1
  2378. 1
  2379. 1
  2380. 1
  2381. 1
  2382. 1
  2383. 1
  2384. 1
  2385. 1
  2386. 1
  2387. 1
  2388. 1
  2389. 1
  2390. 1
  2391. 1
  2392. 1
  2393. 1
  2394. 1
  2395. 1
  2396. 1
  2397. 1
  2398. 1
  2399. 1
  2400. 1
  2401. 1
  2402. 1
  2403. 1
  2404. 1
  2405. 1
  2406. 1
  2407. 1
  2408. 1
  2409. 1
  2410. 1
  2411. 1
  2412. 1
  2413. 1
  2414. 1
  2415. 1
  2416. 1
  2417. 1
  2418. 1
  2419. 1
  2420. 1
  2421. 1
  2422. 1
  2423. 1
  2424. 1
  2425. 1
  2426. 1
  2427. 1
  2428. 1
  2429. 1
  2430. 1
  2431. 1
  2432. 1
  2433. 1
  2434. 1
  2435. 1
  2436. 1
  2437. 1
  2438. 1
  2439. 1
  2440. 1
  2441. 1
  2442. 1
  2443. 1
  2444. 1
  2445. 1
  2446. 1
  2447. 1
  2448. 1
  2449. 1
  2450. 1
  2451. 1
  2452. 1
  2453. 1
  2454. 1
  2455. 1
  2456. 1
  2457. 1
  2458. 1
  2459. 1
  2460. 1
  2461. 1
  2462. 1
  2463. 1
  2464. 1
  2465. 1
  2466. 1
  2467. 1
  2468. 1
  2469. 1
  2470. 1
  2471. 1
  2472. 1
  2473. 1
  2474. 1
  2475. I have been in this situation before. I once worked for a startup where the original code was written in Visual Basic and SQL stored procedures, though all new dev work was done in C# by the time I got there. When I first started working for the project, there were two git repositories and a few hundred sprocs; by the time I left, there were several dozen git repos (most of which had been abandoned) and over two thousand sprocs (because all updates to sproc code were done in new copies since there was no system for schema migrations). Management never understood or communicated actual project requirements, or they just constantly changed their minds -- projects were regularly cancelled after 6+ months of development. One such effort was to modernize the core system, and I was tasked with the DevOps for the new system while also trying to maintain an old infrastructure that was dying. A good portion of my soul was lost in the layered RDP and SSH sessions. The sales team constantly sold features we hadn't built and didn't have on the roadmap, and since the president was doing both management and sales, new requirements for the old system were constantly added, delaying progress on the new system. Because they didn't want disruptions during the work day (which consisted equally of production servers going down and my enraged swearing at the cloud), I often arrived in the late afternoon to work overnight and then leave in the morning after everyone else had arrived. I quickly became an overworked, stressed, and irritable mess. And during this time, I would often end up having to investigate and solve the problems that nobody else could, e.g. a loop that recursively attempted to connect to a sketchy Redis server rather than just fall through to the database (a gift from the insane first dev). I feel for Rick, and my sense is that his outbursts were somewhat exaggerated in the article.
    1
  2476. 1
  2477. 1
  2478. 1
  2479. 1
  2480. 1
  2481. 1
  2482. 1
  2483. 1
  2484. 1
  2485. 1
  2486. 1
  2487. 1
  2488. 1
  2489. 1
  2490. 1
  2491. 1
  2492. 1
  2493. 1
  2494. 1
  2495. 1
  2496. 1
  2497. 1
  2498. 1
  2499. 1
  2500. 1
  2501. 1
  2502. 1
  2503. 1
  2504. 1
  2505. 1
  2506. 1
  2507. 1
  2508. 1
  2509. 1
  2510. 1
  2511. 1
  2512. 1
  2513. 1
  2514. 1
  2515. Whether using a reduced instruction set or a complex one is "better" is a matter of opinion and use case. Complex instruction set architecture operations can take operands from registers, memory, or even the op code itself ("immediate" values). I have implemented a CPU in Minecraft redstone that uses an even more reduced instruction set architecture in which every operation uses only immediate values because it is the simplest way to implement a Brainfuck machine: the data pointer (in its own register) always points to a memory address; "+" and "-" respectively increment or decrement the value at that memory location, implemented as `ADD value` and `SUB value` to compact sequential operations; ">" and "<" respectively increment or decrement the data pointer itself, implemented as `ADP value` and `SDP value` to compact sequential operations; "[" branches if the value at the memory location is 0, taking an offset equal to the number of instructions to skip forward; "]" branches if the value at the memory location is not 0, taking an offset equal to the number of instructions to jump past backwards; "," reads a byte from stdin, writes it to the current memory location then increments the stdin pointer; "." writes the current memory location value to stdout then increments the stdout pointer. If I wanted to implement this with a standard register machine ISA, it would require many more registers and multiple CPU instructions per Brainfuck operation. (I also was able to use 4 copies of the same memory module for stdin buffer, instruction ROM, program RAM, and stdout buffer, greatly simplifying the whole thing.)
    1
  2516. 1
  2517. 1
  2518. 1
  2519. 1
  2520. 1
  2521. 1
  2522. 1
  2523. 1
  2524. 1
  2525. 1
  2526. 1
  2527. 1
  2528. 1
  2529. 1
  2530. 1
  2531. 1
  2532. 1
  2533. 1
  2534. 1
  2535. 1
  2536. 1
  2537. 1
  2538. 1
  2539. 1
  2540. 1
  2541. 1
  2542. 1
  2543. 1
  2544. 1
  2545. 1
  2546. 1
  2547. 1
  2548. 1
  2549. 1
  2550. 1
  2551. 1
  2552. 1
  2553. 1
  2554. 1
  2555. 1
  2556. 1
  2557. 1
  2558. 1
  2559. 1
  2560. 1
  2561. 1
  2562. 1
  2563. 1
  2564. 1
  2565. 1
  2566. 1
  2567. 1
  2568. 1
  2569. 1
  2570. 1
  2571. 1
  2572. 1
  2573. 1
  2574. 1
  2575. 1
  2576. 1
  2577. 1
  2578. 1
  2579. 1
  2580. 1
  2581. 1
  2582. 1
  2583. 1
  2584. 1
  2585. 1
  2586. 1
  2587. 1
  2588. 1
  2589. 1
  2590. 1
  2591. 1
  2592. 1
  2593. 1
  2594. 1
  2595. 1
  2596. 1
  2597. 1
  2598. 1
  2599. 1
  2600. 1
  2601. 1
  2602. 1
  2603. 1
  2604. 1
  2605. 1
  2606. 1
  2607. 1
  2608. 1
  2609. 1
  2610. 1
  2611. 1
  2612. 1
  2613. 1
  2614. 1
  2615. 1
  2616. 1
  2617. 1
  2618. 1
  2619. 1
  2620. 1
  2621. 1
  2622. 1
  2623. 1
  2624. 1
  2625. 1
  2626. 1
  2627. 1
  2628. 1
  2629. 1
  2630. 1
  2631. 1
  2632. 1
  2633. 1
  2634. 1
  2635. 1
  2636. 1
  2637. 1
  2638. 1
  2639. 1
  2640. 1
  2641. 1
  2642. 1
  2643. 1
  2644. 1
  2645. 1
  2646. 1
  2647. 1
  2648. 1
  2649. 1
  2650. 1
  2651. 1
  2652. 1
  2653. 1
  2654. 1
  2655. 1
  2656. 1
  2657. 1
  2658. 1
  2659. 1
  2660. 1
  2661. 1
  2662. 1
  2663. 1
  2664. 1
  2665. 1
  2666. 1
  2667. 1
  2668. 1
  2669. 1
  2670. 1
  2671. 1
  2672. On the topic of blockchain and cryptocurrency: a blockchain is not a distributed ledger. A blockchain is simply a single chain directed acyclic graph of blocks in which each added block is the new root of the DAG (i.e. a graph where each vertex has a degree of 1 or 2). "Distributed ledger" is also a misnomer: all current systems use a replicated ledger, not a distributed one, within a replicated state machine. The ledger data is embedded within and distributed through the blockchain. A truly distributed ledger would be one in which transaction data is retained local to the transactors rather than replicated across the whole globe. This is theoretically possible, and it can be done without a blockchain. Satoshi Nakamoto described his innovation of using proof-of-work to order transactions as a distributed timestamping server, but global consensus is not necessary in every scenario. It is theoretically possible to create a cryptocurrency without a blockchain as typically envisioned, using correspondent credit relationships. I have done a lot of research and preliminary experiments toward this end, and I have written a number of dependency packages for the project. I expect to have a working prototype done sometime next year. The only purpose for blockchain is global consensus, and this necessarily involves throughput limitations. Globally replicated state also creates a massive data retention burden upon network participants. For most intents and purposes, blockchain is a slower, shittier database.
    1
  2673. 1
  2674. 1
  2675. 1
  2676. 1
  2677. 1
  2678. 1
  2679. 1
  2680. 1
  2681. 1
  2682. 1
  2683. 1
  2684. 1
  2685. 1
  2686. 1
  2687. 1
  2688. 1
  2689. 1
  2690. 1
  2691. 1
  2692. 1
  2693. 1
  2694. 1
  2695. 1
  2696. 1
  2697. 1
  2698. 1
  2699. 1
  2700. 1
  2701. 1
  2702. 1
  2703. 1
  2704. 1
  2705. 1
  2706. 1
  2707. 1
  2708. 1
  2709. 1
  2710. 1
  2711. 1
  2712. 1
  2713. 1
  2714. 1
  2715. 1
  2716. 1
  2717. 1
  2718. 1
  2719. 1
  2720. 1
  2721. 1
  2722. 1
  2723. 1
  2724. 1
  2725. 1
  2726. 1
  2727. 1
  2728. 1
  2729. 1
  2730. 1
  2731. I don't mean to offend or demean, but I think many who resonate with this message are probably doing a psychological factory reset to the cultural default beliefs because of the shock of being confronted with a real apocalypse. Don't get me wrong -- Christian ritual definitely works; the Christian perspective is full of cohesive meaning; and these are probably pretty impactful to an awakening post-materialist/Nihilist/whatever-paradigm-is-currently-ending when it happens. But I caution against blindly accepting superficial religious doctrines/perspectives of one's childhood or the nearest preacher -- there is a lot of symbolic and linguistic depth to the Christian religion and scriptures that reaches back to the founding of civilization itself, and a lot of the old/establishment Christianity tends to ignore that depth when dispensing teachings for the masses. For example, when Jesus promises "ζωήν αιώονιον" ("life aeonic") in John 6:42/48 and "ζήσεται είς τόν αιώνα" ("will live into/in/until the aeon/age") in John 6:51, His listeners with the ears to hear knew what that meant from hundreds of years of what Justin Martyr called "Spermatikos Logos". And as another example, "Ιησούς" has the numeric value of 888; 1st and 2nd century Christian tombstones included an 8-spoke wheel cryptogram that encoded the letters "ΙΧΘΥς" ("fish") standing for the anagram "Ιησούς Χριστός Θεού Υιός Σωτήρ" ("Jesus Christ God's Son Saviour"); Jesus resurrected on the 8th day of the week (i.e. 1st of the week because 8 modulo 7 is 1); and Jesus claims the epithet "ό αστήρ ό λαμπρός καί ορθρινός" ("Bright and Morning Star") in Revelation 22:16 (compare to the iconography of the Akkadian version of the Morning Star, then compare to Byzantine icons of Mary the Theotokos). The language used has a thousand years of recorded history and meaning compressed into every word, and the symbols used stretch from pre-Sumeria to Egypt and Eleusis. It is mind blowing stuff when you dig into it. If you're going to take Christianity seriously, I highly recommend getting an interlinear New Testament and learning some Koine/classical Greek (or at least getting some reliable reference material for assisting in translation). If you're a nutter nerd like me, you might also consider a Septuagint in original Greek. (Contrary to popular assumption, the Greek Old Testament predates the Hebrew Old Testament/Masoretic by at least 500 years.)
    1
  2732. 1
  2733. 1
  2734. 1
  2735. 1
  2736. 1
  2737. 1
  2738. 1
  2739. 1
  2740. 1
  2741. 1
  2742. 1
  2743. 1
  2744. 1
  2745. 1
  2746. 1
  2747. 1
  2748. 1
  2749. 1
  2750. 1
  2751. 1
  2752. 1
  2753. 1
  2754. 1
  2755. 1
  2756. 1
  2757. 1
  2758. 1
  2759. 1
  2760. 1
  2761. 1
  2762. 1
  2763. 1
  2764. 1
  2765. 1
  2766. 1
  2767. 1
  2768. 1
  2769. 1
  2770. 1
  2771. 1
  2772. 1
  2773. 1
  2774. 1
  2775. 1
  2776. 1
  2777. 1
  2778. 1
  2779. 1
  2780. 1
  2781. 1
  2782. 1
  2783. 1
  2784. 1
  2785. 1
  2786. 1
  2787. 1
  2788. 1
  2789. 1
  2790. 1
  2791. 1
  2792. 1
  2793. 1
  2794. 1
  2795. 1
  2796. 1
  2797. 1
  2798. 1
  2799. 1
  2800. 1
  2801. 1
  2802. 1
  2803. 1
  2804. 1
  2805. 1
  2806. 1
  2807. 1
  2808. 1
  2809. 1
  2810. 1
  2811. 1
  2812. 1
  2813. 1
  2814. 1
  2815. 1
  2816. 1
  2817. 1
  2818. 1
  2819. 1
  2820. 1
  2821. 1
  2822. 1
  2823. 1
  2824. 1
  2825. 1
  2826. 1
  2827. 1
  2828. 1
  2829. 1
  2830. 1
  2831. 1
  2832. 1
  2833. 1
  2834. 1
  2835. 1
  2836. 1
  2837. 1
  2838. 1
  2839. 1
  2840. 1
  2841. 1
  2842. 1
  2843. 1
  2844. 1
  2845. 1
  2846. 1
  2847. 1
  2848. 1
  2849. 1
  2850. 1
  2851. 1
  2852. 1
  2853. 1
  2854. 1
  2855. 1
  2856. 1
  2857. 1
  2858. 1
  2859. 1
  2860. 1
  2861. 1
  2862. 1
  2863. 1
  2864. 1
  2865. 1
  2866. 1
  2867. 1
  2868. 1
  2869. 1
  2870. 1
  2871. 1
  2872. 1
  2873. 1
  2874. 1
  2875. 1
  2876. 1
  2877. 1
  2878. 1
  2879. 1
  2880. 1
  2881. 1
  2882. 1
  2883. 1
  2884. 1
  2885. 1
  2886. 1
  2887. 1
  2888. 1
  2889. 1
  2890. 1
  2891. 1
  2892. 1
  2893. 1
  2894. 1
  2895. 1
  2896. 1
  2897. 1
  2898. 1
  2899. 1
  2900. 1
  2901. 1
  2902. In Florida, the sheriff and his deputies are required to post a bond or buy an insurance policy for payment of fines and civil damages in the case of civil liberties violations. Statute 30 covers the specifics. (To my knowledge, municipal police are not subject to state requirements for bond/surety, but it is possible I simply have not read that chapter yet.) From first- and second-hand experiences, I estimate that this explicit liability for civil liberty infringement has led to a sheriff system that is more conversational than punitive. For example, if you slide past a stop sign in a dangerous intersection, you're more likely to get a warning than a ticket -- the purpose of having the deputy there is public safety, not raising revenue. Another example: one of my friends got stopped for not renewing his tag (in protest over the system not pro-rating the fee). He had a lot of cash on him because his boss had just paid his weekly salary in cash. Since he's from Chiraq, he had a very aggressive and non-cooperative attitude that made the deputy suspect he was trying to hide something, so the deputy searched the car. Normally, the cash could be charged with a crime under civil forfeiture laws, but the deputy instead simply commented that he better not be up to any fishy business with the money and then let him go. In yet another example, a roommate in college was dealing drugs and throwing parties, and I and my other roommate wanted him to stop, so after a few weeks of being unable to convince him to stop, we called the sheriff to report it. When the deputies arrived, the party attendants flushed all their drugs and hid a lot of paraphernalia (the apartment still smelled, and not all paraphernalia was adequately hidden). The deputies explained to them that there had been a complaint, wrote down their contact info, tried to dissuade them from continuing in their destructive ways, and then left. We had a cleaner, quieter apartment and a better-behaving roommate for the rest of the lease term.
    1
  2903. 1
  2904. 1
  2905. 1
  2906. 1
  2907. 1
  2908. 1
  2909. 1
  2910. 1
  2911. 1
  2912. 1
  2913. 1
  2914. 1
  2915. 1
  2916. 1
  2917. 1
  2918. 1
  2919. 1
  2920. 1
  2921. 1
  2922. 1
  2923. 1
  2924. 1
  2925. 1
  2926. 1
  2927. 1
  2928. 1
  2929. 1
  2930. 1
  2931. 1
  2932. 1
  2933. 1
  2934. 1
  2935. 1
  2936. 1
  2937. 1
  2938. 1
  2939. 1
  2940. 1
  2941. 1
  2942. 1
  2943. 1
  2944. 1
  2945. 1
  2946. 1
  2947. 1
  2948. 1
  2949. 1
  2950. 1
  2951. 1
  2952. 1
  2953. 1
  2954. 1
  2955. 1
  2956. 1
  2957. 1
  2958. 1
  2959. 1
  2960. 1
  2961. 1
  2962. 1
  2963. 1
  2964. 1
  2965. 1
  2966. 1
  2967. 1
  2968. 1
  2969. 1
  2970. 1
  2971. 1
  2972. 1
  2973. 1
  2974. 1
  2975. 1
  2976. 1
  2977. 1
  2978. 1
  2979. 1
  2980. 1
  2981. 1
  2982. 1
  2983. 1
  2984. 1
  2985. 1
  2986. 1
  2987. 1
  2988. 1
  2989. 1
  2990. 1
  2991. 1
  2992. 1
  2993. 1
  2994. 1
  2995. 1
  2996. 1
  2997. 1
  2998. 1
  2999. 1
  3000. 1
  3001. 1
  3002. 1
  3003. 1
  3004. 1
  3005. 1
  3006. 1
  3007. 1
  3008. 1
  3009. 1
  3010. 1
  3011. 1
  3012. 1
  3013. 1
  3014. 1
  3015. 1
  3016. 1
  3017. 1
  3018. 1
  3019. 1
  3020. 1
  3021. 1
  3022. 1
  3023. 1
  3024. 1
  3025. 1
  3026. 1
  3027. 1
  3028. 1
  3029. 1
  3030. 1
  3031. 1
  3032. 1
  3033. 1
  3034. 1
  3035. 1
  3036. 1
  3037. 1
  3038. 1
  3039. 1
  3040. 1
  3041. 1
  3042. 1
  3043. 1
  3044. 1
  3045. 1
  3046. 1
  3047. 1
  3048. 1
  3049. 1
  3050. 1
  3051. 1
  3052. 1
  3053. 1
  3054. 1
  3055. 1
  3056. 1
  3057. 1
  3058. NIST has been running a post-quantum asymmetric cryptography standardization competition for several years, and the result has been a handful of new methods, the most noteworthy of which are the related Kyber and Dilithium lattice algorithms (together comprising the PQ Crystals project). Signal already uses PQ crypto as an additional layer of security. Wrt Bitcoin, the elliptic curve cryptography is potentially vulnerable to a sufficiently powerful quantum computer, but most addresses are actually a double hash of the public key, and hash algorithms are not vulnerable to quantum computing, so only such addresses that are reused would be vulnerable to a quantum attack. However, the new Taproot addresses use a Schnorr group derived from the elliptic curve to commit to both a public key and a script hash, so they might be vulnerable at the outset. The problem with PQ crypto schemes is that the smallest key sizes are 2+ orders of magnitude larger than EC public keys of equivalent security level, and the signature sizes are also several orders of magnitude larger (e.g. lattice public keys are several kilobytes and McEliese code signatures are several megabytes). These could potentially be accommodated by using the hash of the public key as the address, including both the public key and the signature in the witness data, and increasing the witness data block size with a soft-fork, but it would make the blockchain much larger and thus harder to replicate in a distributed fashion. Fun factoid: I implemented a hash-based PQ cryptography algorithm called the Lamport Signature scheme when I was in college. In addition to the large key and signature sizes, it also has the problem that keys can only be used once since they rely upon selectively revealing part of the private key. (Hopefully the gestapobots don't censor this for being detailed and factual. The censorship on this platform is unbearably irritating.)
    1
  3059. 1
  3060. 1
  3061. 1
  3062. 1
  3063. 1
  3064. 1
  3065. 1
  3066. 1
  3067. 1
  3068. 1
  3069. 1
  3070. 1
  3071. 1
  3072. 1
  3073. 1
  3074. 1
  3075. 1
  3076. 1
  3077. 1
  3078. 1
  3079. 1
  3080. 1
  3081. 1
  3082. 1
  3083. 1
  3084. 1
  3085. 1
  3086. 1
  3087. 1
  3088. 1
  3089. 1
  3090. 1
  3091. 1
  3092. 1
  3093. 1
  3094. 1
  3095. 1
  3096. 1
  3097. 1
  3098. 1
  3099. 1
  3100. 1
  3101. 1
  3102. 1
  3103. 1
  3104. 1
  3105. 1
  3106. 1
  3107. 1
  3108. 1
  3109. 1
  3110. 1
  3111. 1
  3112. 1
  3113. 1
  3114. 1
  3115. 1
  3116. 1
  3117. 1
  3118. 1
  3119. 1
  3120. 1
  3121. 1
  3122. 1
  3123. 1
  3124. 1
  3125. 1
  3126. 1
  3127. 1
  3128. 1
  3129. 1
  3130. 1
  3131. 1
  3132. 1
  3133. 1
  3134. 1
  3135. 1
  3136. 1
  3137. 1
  3138. 1
  3139. 1
  3140. 1
  3141. 1
  3142. 1
  3143. 1
  3144. 1
  3145. 1
  3146. 1
  3147. 1
  3148. 1
  3149. 1
  3150. 1
  3151. 1
  3152. 1
  3153. 1
  3154. 1
  3155. 1
  3156. 1
  3157. 1
  3158. 1
  3159. 1
  3160. 1
  3161. 1
  3162. 1
  3163. 1
  3164. 1
  3165. 1
  3166. 1
  3167. 1
  3168. 1
  3169. 1
  3170. 1
  3171. 1
  3172. 1
  3173. 1
  3174. 1
  3175. 1
  3176. 1
  3177. 1
  3178. 1
  3179. 1
  3180. 1
  3181. 1
  3182. 1
  3183. 1
  3184. 1
  3185. 1
  3186. 1
  3187. 1
  3188. 1
  3189. 1
  3190. 1
  3191. 1
  3192. 1
  3193. 1
  3194. 1
  3195. 1
  3196. 1
  3197. 1
  3198. 1
  3199. 1
  3200.  @lastcall8286  the Christian prophecies are always coming to fruition because they were just a pseudo-mystical description of the then-current times -- they are just a description of events that commonly occur throughout history. There's no special value to them anymore than my noticing the 2018 yield curve inversion gave my prophecy of the 2019-2020 crisis/recession any spiritual or magical significance. The same can be said about the prophecies of many religions. For example, from the Voluspa (a dead witch's prophecy of Ragnarok) in the Poetic Edda: "(38) I saw oathbreakers wading in those thick streams, and murderers, and those who seduce others' lovers. There Nithhogg sucks the corpses of the fallen, snaps them in his jaws. Have you learned enough yet, Allfather?...(44) Brothers will fight one another and kill one another, cousins will break peace with one another, the world will be a hard place to live in. It will be an age of adultery, an age of the axe, an age of the sword, an age of storms, an age of wolves, shields will be cloven. Before the world sinks in the sea, there will be no man left who is true to another." Another example, randomly selected from the Dead Sea Scrolls (Hymn 10 (formerly 5) of the Thanksgiving Hymns): (~30) The torrents of Belial shall reach to all sides of the world. In all their channels a consuming fire shall destroy every tree, green and barren, on their banks; unto the end of their courses it shall scourge with flames of fire, and shall consume the foundations of the earth and the expanse of dry land. The bases of the mountains shall blaze and the roots of the rocks shall turn to torrents of pitch; it shall devour as far as the great Abyss." There are many scriptures that have prophecies that apply broadly because human civilization is inherently cyclical. It does not grant any spiritual superiority to any over the others. In my opinion, "you will know them by their fruits". I can indeed describe my religion with quite a lot of detail and scriptural references. It just isn't any of your business. Y'all slaughtered the gnostics for their slight differences in opinion, so I have no interest in relaying to you mine. Some of those fruits Iesous was talking about. Also, if you are criticizing me for not addressing the specific Christian prophecies, then why haven't you done so? You have said nothing specific at all.
    1
  3201. 1
  3202. 1
  3203. 1
  3204. 1
  3205. 1
  3206. 1
  3207. 1
  3208. 1
  3209. 1
  3210. 1
  3211. 1
  3212. 1
  3213. 1
  3214. 1
  3215. 1
  3216. 1
  3217. 1
  3218. 1
  3219. 1
  3220. 1
  3221. 1
  3222. 1
  3223. 1
  3224. 1
  3225. 1
  3226. 1
  3227. 1
  3228. 1
  3229. 1
  3230. 1
  3231. 1
  3232. 1
  3233. 1
  3234. 1
  3235. 1
  3236. 1
  3237. 1
  3238. 1
  3239. 1
  3240. 1
  3241. 1
  3242. 1
  3243. 1
  3244. 1
  3245. 1
  3246. 1
  3247. 1
  3248. 1
  3249. 1
  3250. 1
  3251. 1
  3252. 1
  3253. 1
  3254. 1
  3255. 1
  3256. 1
  3257. 1
  3258. 1
  3259. 1
  3260. 1
  3261. 1
  3262. 1
  3263. 1
  3264. 1
  3265. 1
  3266. 1
  3267. 1
  3268. 1
  3269. 1
  3270. 1
  3271. 1
  3272. 1
  3273. 1
  3274. 1
  3275. 1
  3276. 1
  3277. 1
  3278. 1
  3279. 1
  3280. 1
  3281. 1
  3282. 1
  3283. 1
  3284. 1
  3285. 1
  3286. 1
  3287. 1
  3288. 1
  3289. 1
  3290. 1
  3291. 1
  3292. 1
  3293. 1
  3294. 1
  3295. 1
  3296. 1
  3297. 1
  3298. 1
  3299. 1
  3300. 1
  3301. 1
  3302. 1
  3303. 1
  3304. 1
  3305. 1
  3306. 1
  3307. 1
  3308. 1
  3309. 1
  3310. 1
  3311. 1
  3312. 1
  3313. 1
  3314. 1
  3315. 1
  3316. 1
  3317. 1
  3318. 1
  3319. 1
  3320. 1
  3321. 1
  3322. 1
  3323. 1
  3324. 1
  3325. 1
  3326. 1
  3327. 1
  3328. 1
  3329. 1
  3330. 1
  3331. 1
  3332. 1
  3333. 1
  3334. 1
  3335. 1
  3336. 1
  3337. 1
  3338. 1
  3339. 1
  3340. 1
  3341. 1
  3342. 1
  3343. 1
  3344. 1
  3345. 1
  3346. 1
  3347. 1
  3348. 1
  3349. 1
  3350. 1
  3351. 1
  3352. 1
  3353. 1
  3354. 1
  3355. 1
  3356. 1
  3357. 1
  3358. 1
  3359. 1
  3360. 1
  3361. 1
  3362. 1
  3363. 1
  3364. 1
  3365. 1
  3366. 1
  3367. 1
  3368. 1
  3369. 1
  3370. 1
  3371. 1
  3372. 1
  3373. 1
  3374. 1
  3375. 1
  3376. 1
  3377. 1
  3378. 1
  3379. 1
  3380. 1
  3381. 1
  3382. 1
  3383. 1
  3384. 1
  3385. 1
  3386. 1
  3387. 1
  3388. 1
  3389. 1
  3390. 1
  3391. 1
  3392. 1
  3393. 1
  3394. 1
  3395. 1
  3396. 1
  3397. 1
  3398. 1
  3399. 1
  3400. 1
  3401. 1
  3402. 1
  3403. 1
  3404. 1
  3405. 1
  3406. 1
  3407. 1
  3408. 1
  3409. 1
  3410. 1
  3411. 1
  3412. 1
  3413. 1
  3414. 1
  3415. 1
  3416. 1
  3417. 1
  3418. 1
  3419. 1
  3420. 1
  3421. 1
  3422. 1
  3423. 1
  3424. 1
  3425. 1
  3426. 1
  3427. 1
  3428. 1
  3429. 1
  3430. 1
  3431. 1
  3432. 1
  3433. 1
  3434. 1
  3435. 1
  3436. 1
  3437. 1
  3438. 1
  3439. 1
  3440. 1
  3441. 1
  3442. 1
  3443. 1
  3444. 1
  3445. 1
  3446. 1
  3447. 1
  3448. 1
  3449. 1
  3450. 1
  3451. 1
  3452. 1
  3453. 1
  3454. 1
  3455. 1
  3456. 1
  3457. 1
  3458. 1
  3459. 1
  3460. 1
  3461. 1
  3462. 1
  3463. 1
  3464. 1
  3465. 1
  3466. 1
  3467. 1
  3468. 1
  3469. 1
  3470. 1
  3471. 1
  3472. 1
  3473. 1
  3474. 1
  3475. He was saying that you lose your soul through the deceit that is federal debt monetization. It is an end-run around the constitution. The federal government is not constitutionally allowed to print currency. Y'all clearly have no idea what you're talking about when it comes to monetary policy. The only reason that the hyperbolic expansion of the money supply has not yet led to runaway inflation is that the dollar is used as a global reserve currency -- over half of all global trade is conducted in dollars. European countries trade with South American countries in USD. As a consequence of the economic quagmire of the debt burden and the lockdowns, monetary velocity has substantially decreased -- we have been exporting our inflation to the rest of the world through trade deficits, hollowing out our economy in the process. What we know from history is that every global reserve currency eventually falls out of favor, and with the dedollarization trend picking up steam, that time will soon come for the dollar, and all those tens of trillions we have printed will return to America to chase the few goods and services that remain. We are also very close to global systemic banking collapse due to the shipping container shortage and other supply chain disruptions. Throwing caution to the wind is a terrible idea. Rand Paul is not against charity or the less than $200 billion that was appropriated for stimulus checks. He is against reckless fiscal and monetary policy represented by the $2.1 trillion in non-stimulus bloat. The stimulus is just a red herring to distract the public from the systemic problems of federal government disfunction.
    1
  3476. 1
  3477. 1
  3478. 1
  3479. 1
  3480. 1
  3481. 1
  3482. 1
  3483. 1
  3484. 1
  3485. 1
  3486. 1
  3487. 1
  3488. 1
  3489. 1
  3490. 1
  3491. 1
  3492. 1
  3493. 1
  3494. 1
  3495. 1
  3496. 1
  3497. 1
  3498. 1
  3499. 1
  3500. 1
  3501. 1
  3502. 1
  3503. 1
  3504. 1
  3505. 1
  3506. 1
  3507. 1
  3508. 1
  3509. 1
  3510. 1
  3511. 1
  3512. 1
  3513. 1
  3514. 1
  3515. 1
  3516. 1
  3517. 1
  3518. 1
  3519. 1
  3520. 1
  3521. 1
  3522. 1
  3523. 1
  3524. 1
  3525. 1
  3526. 1
  3527. 1
  3528. 1
  3529. 1
  3530. 1
  3531. 1
  3532. 1
  3533. 1
  3534. 1
  3535. 1
  3536. 1
  3537. 1
  3538. 1
  3539. 1
  3540. 1
  3541. 1
  3542. 1
  3543. 1
  3544. 1
  3545. 1
  3546. 1
  3547. 1
  3548. 1
  3549. 1
  3550. 1
  3551. 1
  3552. 1
  3553. 1
  3554. 1
  3555. 1
  3556. 1
  3557. 1
  3558. 1
  3559. 1
  3560. 1
  3561. 1
  3562. 1
  3563. 1
  3564. 1
  3565. 1
  3566. 1
  3567. 1
  3568. 1
  3569. 1
  3570. 1
  3571. 1
  3572. 1
  3573. 1
  3574. The subprime collapse led to the global financial crisis because the assets were mingled with the collateral necessary for international money markets and fiduciary functioning, and the resultant hybrid assets were used as collateral; when the subprime loans went bad, it dragged down the entire swathe of assets they were mingled with and wiped out most collateral in the system, so credit froze. The losses to American banks due to the subprime loans themselves was small compared to the losses caused by the collateral implosion. With China, the bad real estate assets are owned by investors in China. The ongoing collapse in Chinese real estate (which perhaps should be renamed "real fake-estate") is unlikely to contaminate global money markets and fiduciary functioning because nobody outside of China was dumb enough to buy into their bubble. However, a deflationary impulse is expected because banks and international investors do have some exposure to bonds issued by the giant developer companies that are up shit creek sans paddle (30+ out of the 50 largest are in default right now from what I've heard). Primary effect will be a regional depression in Asia and recession elsewhere; secondary effect will be rising consumer prices as Chinese exporters fail to deliver to markets that import a lot of Chinese goods. If JPow misinterprets the secondary effect, he'll contribute significantly to the primary one with more bad policy. (It's almost like having a central politburo to declare interest rates is a bad idea.)
    1
  3575. 1
  3576. 1
  3577. 1
  3578. 1
  3579. 1
  3580. 1
  3581. 1
  3582. 1
  3583. Mark, what is your take on the issues around immigration in Canada and some European countries? For example, in Canada, they have experienced extreme housing price inflation and other economic disruptions so great that their per capita GDP has declined in nominal terms; Canada has imported mostly skilled workers, driving down wages for skilled Canadians while the cost of living has been skyrocketing. In Germany and the UK, they have been less selective with their immigration policies, and the result has been significant increases in poverty and accompanying crime (and there is an argument for cultural differences driving some types of crimes and various scandals about those crimes being covered up). How temporary or persistent will these issues be? What benefits can these countries expect in the medium and long terms for the pain that ordinary citizens are experiencing right now? My initial thought is that the governments of these countries are trying to arrest demographic decline to avoid becoming Japanified, but I don't know how effective they will be considering the ubiquity of failed integration. On the one hand, the US has experienced more than our fair share of issues with integrating immigrants through a few centuries, and we have come through mostly okay as a whole, but on the other hand, this was not without internment camps, exclusion acts, ethnically motivated violence, and the like. And on top of that, the European countries with mass and unselective immigration are known to be sclerotic and not technologically very innovative, so increasing their populations might not have the desired effect. It's a complex issue that is evoking a lot of simplistic proposals by disaffected citizens.
    1
  3584. 1
  3585. 1
  3586. 1
  3587. 1
  3588. 1
  3589. 1
  3590. 1
  3591. 1
  3592. 1
  3593. 1
  3594. 1
  3595. 1
  3596.  @fairybeliever4479  One of the difficulties with numinous experiences is that numinous effects tend to conform to the expectations of the perceiver. This is related to (if not identical with) what the remote viewing researchers call the "analytical overlay". For example, if you grew up in a cultural context dominated by Abrahamic religions, you will be predisposed to experience numinous phenomena that align with the philosophical, metaphysical, and ontological ideas prominent in that culture; if you consciously rejected Abrahamic religion and found Hindu myth and scriptures fascinating or relatable, or if you grew up in a Hindu context and did not consciously reject it, you will be predisposed to have numinous experiences that conform to Hindu ideas. (In general, religions will discredit any numinous experience that does not align with the official narrative and reinforce as legitimate any numinous experience that conforms to the religious dogmas and themes. Religious control over spiritual experience is primarily a boundary maintenance mechanism for social cohesion.) I tend to dissect my experiences after the fact to recognize the influences that colored my perceptions. For example, when I was reading about and experimenting with astral projection/out-of-body experiences, after I had read about a concept called the "guardian of the threshold", I had a very potent experience of this phenomenon -- I have had OBEs since I was 5 years old and had already had several controlled OBEs through meditative practices by this point, but this was the first (and only) time I experienced this threshold guardian phenomenon. It is impossible for information to be meaningfully conveyed without some pre-existing frame of reference, and numinous experience takes this principle to an exaggerated degree. The only pieces of advice I would give anyone on any spiritual path are the following: first, nothing is perpetually beyond scrutiny -- there is a time to acquiescence to riddles, but there is likewise a time for a stubborn resolve to extract answers; and second, stay away from egregores unless you know what you are getting yourself into.
    1
  3597. 1
  3598. 1
  3599. 1
  3600. 1
  3601. 1
  3602. 1
  3603. 1
  3604. 1
  3605. 1
  3606. 2:25 “And all the [Watchers] took unto themselves wives, and each chose for himself one, and they began to go in unto them and to defile themselves with them [...] And they became pregnant, and they bare great giants, whose height was three thousand ells: Who consumed all the acquisitions of men. And when men could no longer sustain them, the giants turned against them and devoured mankind. And they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish, and to devour one another's flesh, and drink the blood. Then the earth laid accusation against the lawless ones. [...] And as men perished, they cried, and their cry went up to heaven. [...] And to Gabriel said the Lord: "Proceed against the bastards and the reprobates, and against the children of fornication: and destroy the children of the Watchers from among men: send them one against the other that they may destroy each other in battle: for length of days they will not have. And no request that they make of you will be granted unto their fathers on their behalf; for they hope to live an eternal life, and that each one of them will live 500 years." And the Lord said unto Michael: "Go, bind Semjaza and his associates who have united themselves with women so as to have defiled themselves with them in all uncleanness. And when their sons have slain one another, and they have seen the destruction of their beloved ones, bind them fast for seventy generations in the valleys of the earth, until the day of their judgment..."” -- 1 Enoch, chapters 7, 8, and 10
    1
  3607. 1
  3608. 1
  3609. 1
  3610. 1
  3611. 1
  3612. 1
  3613. 1
  3614. 1
  3615. 1
  3616. 1
  3617. 1
  3618. 1
  3619. 1
  3620. 1
  3621. 1
  3622. 1
  3623. 1
  3624. 1
  3625. 1
  3626. 1
  3627. 1
  3628. 1
  3629. 1
  3630. 1
  3631. 1
  3632. 1
  3633. 1
  3634. 1
  3635. 1
  3636. 1
  3637. 1
  3638. 1
  3639. 1
  3640. 1
  3641. 1
  3642. 1
  3643. 1
  3644. 1
  3645. 1
  3646. 1
  3647. 1
  3648. 1
  3649. 1
  3650. 1
  3651. 1
  3652. 1
  3653. 1
  3654. 1
  3655. 1
  3656. 1
  3657. 1
  3658. 1
  3659. 1
  3660. 1
  3661. 1
  3662. 1
  3663. 1
  3664. 1
  3665. I highly recommend the book The Bitcoin Standard: The Decentralized Alternative to Centralized Banking by Saifedean Ammous. The first several chapters are purely about economics, particularly the failures of Keynesian economics and the empirical/historical evidence for Austrian economics. The author then applies an empirical understanding of Austrian economics to the matter of a theoretical Bitcoin standard. One interesting thing to note is that silver was demonetized over time by gold because gold has superior monetary characteristics -- the nations that held onto the silver standard the longest (India and China's century of humiliation) lost heavily in global trade as a result of their money naturally devaluing against gold. I still like silver, but it is unempirical to describe it as still being a great monetary asset rather than a mostly industrial commodity. And since Bitcoin has even better monetary characteristics than gold (e.g. no industrial use for bitcoin whereas about a fifth of global gold production supplies non-monetary demand; greater portability, scarcity, and divisibility; lower cost and time to settle large values; etc), it will likely eventually demonetize gold the way gold demonetized silver: that isn't to say that gold will lose all value, but rather that its monetary premium will be absorbed by Bitcoin, allowing for relatively lower gold jewelry prices and greater industrial utilization of gold. Once the Bitcoin standard has been globally adopted, gold will be to bitcoin as silver is to gold. If anyone has any legitimate arguments for why Bitcoin's superior monetary characteristics will not conquer gold or why the demonstrable history of gold's superior monetary characteristics conquering silver are no longer valid, I'm all ears and eyes.
    1
  3666. 1
  3667. 1
  3668. 1
  3669. 1
  3670. 1
  3671. 1
  3672. 1
  3673. 1
  3674. 1
  3675. 1
  3676. 1
  3677. 1
  3678. 1
  3679. 1
  3680. 1
  3681. 1
  3682. 1
  3683. 1
  3684. 1
  3685. 1
  3686. 1
  3687. 1
  3688. 1
  3689. 1
  3690. 1
  3691. 1
  3692. 1
  3693. 1
  3694. 1
  3695. 1
  3696. 1
  3697. 1
  3698. 1
  3699. 1
  3700. 1
  3701. 1
  3702. 1
  3703. 1
  3704. 1
  3705. 1
  3706. 1
  3707. 1
  3708. 1
  3709. 1
  3710. 1
  3711. 1
  3712. 1
  3713. 1
  3714. 1
  3715. 1
  3716. 1
  3717. 1
  3718. 1
  3719. 1
  3720. 1
  3721. 1
  3722. 1
  3723. 1
  3724. 1
  3725. 1
  3726. 1
  3727. 1
  3728. 1
  3729. 1
  3730. 1
  3731. 1
  3732. 1
  3733. 1
  3734. 1
  3735. 1
  3736. 1
  3737. 1
  3738. 1
  3739. 1
  3740. 1
  3741. 1
  3742. 1
  3743. 1
  3744. 1
  3745. 1
  3746. My proposal (and side project): self-governing crypto system (directed acyclic graph) in which individuals issue currency against their capacity to provide labor, i.e. a distributed time bank. Issuers sign a legally binding contract to accept the currency for payment in transactions and settle outstanding notes they've issued; they elect officers and auditors to fulfill various governance roles to ensure issuer accountability and accuracy, and then they issue tokens and notes. The issuance limit increases with the natural log of the number of issuers to allow higher liquidity for larger economies. Districts self organize and acknowledge each other via mutual audits, creating a trust network; if a district acknowledges N other districts, it will automatically acknowledge districts that have audit certifications from M members of their trust network ("M-of-N" verification, probably set at 2/3). Issuer accounts will use the Account Balance model for issuing, but transactions thereafter use zero-knowlwdge proofs and UTXO model for privacy. Printing of notes will be handled by a special account managed by the treasurer for a district, so everyone will know the quantity issued in notes. Currently, I am still trying to conceptually work out the mechanism for issuers to change districts within the trust network, as well as how to handle the death or disappearance of an issuer (a defacto debasement) and a number of other detailed matters. Any feedback will be appreciated so long as it is at least somewhat coherent.
    1
  3747. 1
  3748. 1
  3749. 1
  3750. 1
  3751. 1
  3752. 1
  3753. 1
  3754. 1
  3755. 1
  3756. 1
  3757. 1
  3758. 1
  3759. 1
  3760. 1
  3761. 1
  3762. 1
  3763. 1
  3764. 1
  3765. 1
  3766. 1
  3767. 1
  3768. 1
  3769. 1
  3770. 1
  3771. 1
  3772. 1
  3773. 1
  3774. 1
  3775. 1
  3776. 1
  3777. 1
  3778. 1
  3779. 1
  3780. 1
  3781. 1
  3782. 1
  3783. 1
  3784. 1
  3785. 1
  3786. 1
  3787. 1
  3788. 1
  3789. 1
  3790. 1
  3791. 1
  3792. 1
  3793. 1
  3794. 1
  3795. 1
  3796. 1
  3797. 1
  3798. 1
  3799. 1
  3800. 1
  3801. 1
  3802. 1
  3803. 1
  3804. 1
  3805. 1
  3806. 1
  3807. 1
  3808. 1
  3809. 1
  3810. 1
  3811. 1
  3812. 1
  3813. 1
  3814. 1
  3815. 1
  3816. 1
  3817. 1
  3818. 1
  3819. 1
  3820. 1
  3821. 1
  3822. 1
  3823. 1
  3824. 1
  3825. 1
  3826. 1
  3827. 1
  3828. 1
  3829. 1
  3830. 1
  3831. 1
  3832. An interesting thing to note about the notion that you can program some of the CBDCs so that "you can't use them to buy X" is that it would require everyone selling X for the CBDC to voluntarily implement the transaction information system on their end: a CBDC, just like any other computer program, is not omniscient -- it knows only the inputs generated by humans using it. Thus, if someone wanted to sell candy to kids whose wallets disallow the purchase of candy, they just would not mark the transaction as one involving candy. There has thus far been one major attempt to create a cryptocurrency system that can track inventory, components, etc from original production all the way through to end user, and that is the shitshow known as Iota which basically does not function. Bureaucrats will be unable to get the privacy-killing pervasive surveillance system that they desire because they are technically incapable of building such a system; and even if they had it, they would be technically incapable of even using it competently, as has been the case with the US domestic surveillance apparatus which has failed countless times to identify and prevent the same tragedies they use to justify their profligate and pointless projects. The most they will be able to achieve in our lifetimes is an inconvenience, and creating such an inconvenience will cause people to use alternatives and thus neuter their project. These idiots fail to understand game theory or just about anything else of relevance for their childishly simplistic schemes.
    1
  3833. 1
  3834. 1
  3835. 1
  3836. 1
  3837. 1
  3838. 1
  3839. 1
  3840. 1
  3841. 1
  3842. 1
  3843. 1
  3844. 1
  3845. 1
  3846. 1
  3847. 1
  3848. 1
  3849. 1
  3850. 1
  3851. 1
  3852. 1
  3853. 1
  3854. 1
  3855. 1
  3856. 1
  3857. 1
  3858. 1
  3859. 1
  3860. 1
  3861. 1
  3862. 1
  3863. 1
  3864. 1
  3865. 1
  3866. 1
  3867. 1
  3868. 1
  3869. 1
  3870. 1
  3871. 1
  3872. 1
  3873. 1
  3874. 1
  3875. 1
  3876. 1
  3877. 1
  3878. 1
  3879. 1
  3880. 1
  3881. 1
  3882. 1
  3883. 1
  3884. 1
  3885. 1
  3886. 1
  3887. 1
  3888. 1
  3889. 1
  3890. 1
  3891. 1
  3892. 1
  3893. 1
  3894. 1
  3895. 1
  3896. 1
  3897. 1
  3898. 1
  3899. 1
  3900. 1
  3901. 1
  3902. 1
  3903. 1
  3904. 1
  3905. 1
  3906. 1
  3907. 1
  3908. 1
  3909. 1
  3910. 1
  3911. 1
  3912. 1
  3913. 1
  3914. 1
  3915. 1
  3916. 1
  3917. 1
  3918. 1
  3919. 1
  3920. 1
  3921. 1
  3922. 1
  3923. 1
  3924. 1
  3925. 1
  3926. 1
  3927. 1
  3928. 1
  3929. 1
  3930. 1
  3931. 1
  3932. 1
  3933. 1
  3934. 1
  3935. 1
  3936. 1
  3937. 1
  3938. 1
  3939. 1
  3940. 1
  3941. 1
  3942. 1
  3943. 1
  3944. 1
  3945. 1
  3946. 1
  3947. 1
  3948. 1
  3949. 1
  3950. 1
  3951. 1
  3952. 1
  3953. 1
  3954. 1
  3955. 1
  3956. 1
  3957. 1
  3958. 1
  3959. 1
  3960. 1
  3961. 1
  3962. 1
  3963. 1
  3964. 1
  3965. 1
  3966. 1
  3967. 1
  3968. 1
  3969. 1
  3970. 1
  3971. 1
  3972. 1
  3973. 1
  3974. 1
  3975. 1
  3976. 1
  3977. 1
  3978. 1
  3979. 1
  3980. 1
  3981. 1
  3982. 1
  3983. 1
  3984. 1
  3985. 1
  3986. 1
  3987. 1
  3988. 1
  3989. 1
  3990. 1
  3991. 1
  3992. 1
  3993. 1
  3994. 1
  3995. 1
  3996. 1
  3997. 1
  3998. 1
  3999. 1
  4000. 1
  4001. 1
  4002. 1
  4003. 1
  4004. 1
  4005. 1
  4006. 1
  4007. 1
  4008. 1
  4009. 1
  4010. 1
  4011. 1
  4012. 1
  4013. 1
  4014. 1
  4015. 1
  4016. 1
  4017. 1
  4018. 1
  4019. 1
  4020. 1
  4021. 1
  4022. 1
  4023. 1
  4024. 1
  4025. 1
  4026. 1
  4027. 1
  4028. 1
  4029. 1
  4030. 1
  4031. 1
  4032. 1
  4033. 1
  4034. 1
  4035. 1
  4036. 1
  4037. 1
  4038. 1
  4039. 1
  4040. 1
  4041. 1
  4042. 1
  4043. 1
  4044. 1
  4045. 1
  4046. 1
  4047. 1
  4048. 1
  4049. 1
  4050. 1
  4051. 1
  4052. 1
  4053. 1
  4054. 1
  4055. 1
  4056. 1
  4057. 1
  4058. 1
  4059. 1
  4060. 1
  4061. 1
  4062. 1
  4063. 1
  4064. 1
  4065. 1
  4066. 1
  4067. 1
  4068. 1
  4069. 1
  4070. 1
  4071. 1
  4072. 1
  4073. 1
  4074. 1
  4075. 1
  4076. 1
  4077. 1
  4078. 1
  4079. 1
  4080. 1
  4081. 1
  4082. 1
  4083. 1
  4084. 1
  4085. 1
  4086. 1
  4087. 1
  4088. 1
  4089. 1
  4090. 1
  4091. 1
  4092. 1
  4093. 1
  4094. 1
  4095. 1
  4096. 1
  4097. 1
  4098. 1
  4099. 1
  4100. 1
  4101. 1
  4102. 1
  4103. 1
  4104. 1
  4105. 1
  4106. 1
  4107. 1
  4108. 1
  4109. 1
  4110. 1
  4111. 1
  4112. 1
  4113. 1
  4114. 1
  4115. 1
  4116. 1
  4117. 1
  4118. 1
  4119. 1
  4120. 1
  4121. 1
  4122. 1
  4123. 1
  4124. 1
  4125. 1
  4126. 1
  4127. 1
  4128. 1
  4129. 1
  4130. 1
  4131. 1
  4132. 1
  4133. 1
  4134. 1
  4135. 1
  4136. 1
  4137. 1
  4138. 1
  4139. 1
  4140. 1
  4141. 1
  4142. 1
  4143. 1
  4144. 1
  4145. 1
  4146. 1
  4147. 1
  4148. 1
  4149. 1
  4150. 1
  4151. 1
  4152. 1
  4153. 1
  4154. 1
  4155. 1
  4156. 1
  4157. 1
  4158. 1
  4159. 1
  4160. 1
  4161. 1
  4162. 1
  4163. 1
  4164. 1
  4165. 1
  4166. 1
  4167. 1
  4168. 1
  4169. 1
  4170. 1
  4171. 1
  4172. 1
  4173. 1
  4174. 1
  4175. 1
  4176. 1
  4177. 1
  4178. 1
  4179. 1
  4180. 1
  4181. 1
  4182. 1
  4183. 1
  4184. 1
  4185. 1
  4186. 1
  4187. 1
  4188. 1
  4189. 1
  4190. 1
  4191. 1
  4192. 1
  4193. 1
  4194. 1
  4195. 1
  4196. 1
  4197. 1
  4198. 1
  4199. 1
  4200. 1
  4201. 1
  4202. 1
  4203. 1
  4204. 1
  4205. 1
  4206. 1
  4207. 1
  4208. 1
  4209. 1
  4210. 1
  4211. 1
  4212. 1
  4213. The SW Expanded Universe already covered events after the Battle of Endor: Han and Leia have three children (Anakin, Jaina, and Jacen) who all become Jedi; Luke has a number of romantic flings/brief marriages and trains his son, Ben, as a Jedi; an extra-galactic colonial armada invades the outer rim and eventually terraforms Coruscant into a copy of their home planet; two of the Solo children die in the resulting madness of the invasion, including Jacen, who undergoes a compelling villain's journey to become Darth Caedus. There was plenty of very well-written material to draw from, but I guess that Catheter Kennedy, Jar-Jar Abrams, and Ruin Johnson figured that engaging narrative and intriguing character development are just not woke enough. The sequel trilogy should have been Jacen Solo's epic war heroism, his descent into darkness, and the tragedy of his death at the blade of his own sister. The main reason Jacen Solo became Darth Caedus was to consolidate power in preparation for a war against a prophetic vision of a warmongering villain -- he literally becomes the enemy he wanted to prevent, and he pays the ultimate price for it. At the end of episode 7, we would leave the theater shaken in horror at Anakin's sacrifice and the torture Jacen suffered in captivity. At the end of episode 8, we would leave reveling in the victory he claimed from his predicament though uneasy by our hero's growing corruption. At the end of episode 9, we would leave feeling distraught by our hero's unredeemable fall from grace and the grief and anger tearing apart the remnants of the Solo family -- the galaxy is one large scar from a decade of constant warfare; the Solo dynasty is a husk of what it once was; countless Jedi have died and Luke has disappeared -- there is no longer anything to fear, but all hope is lost. Now that is a story worth telling in cinematic form.
    1
  4214. 1
  4215. 1
  4216. 1
  4217. 1
  4218. 1
  4219. 1
  4220. 1
  4221. 1
  4222. 1
  4223. 1
  4224. 1
  4225. 1
  4226. 1
  4227. 1
  4228. 1
  4229. 1
  4230. 1
  4231. 1
  4232. 1
  4233. 1
  4234. 1
  4235. 1
  4236. 1
  4237. 1
  4238. 1
  4239. 1
  4240. 1
  4241. 1
  4242. 1
  4243. 1
  4244. 1
  4245. 1
  4246. 1
  4247. 1
  4248. 1
  4249. 1
  4250. 1
  4251. 1
  4252. 1
  4253. 1
  4254. 1
  4255. 1
  4256. 1
  4257. 1
  4258. 1
  4259. 1
  4260. 1
  4261. 1
  4262. 1
  4263. 1
  4264. 1
  4265. 1
  4266. 1
  4267. 1
  4268. 1
  4269. 1
  4270. Wait a minute, these riots have actually hit quite a few small towns within driving distance of the main cities. Check out Michael Tracy's work on it and Tybosaurus Rex's videos on the experience of militias guarding small towns when the riots first started. According to Tybosaurus Rex, antifa sends scouts to find soft targets first, then they send in an agitator to scare people, then they send more scouts at night to make sure the way is clear, and then they send in their useful-idiot protesters and rioters; if there is a show of force when the scouts appear the second time, the riot is averted. It has been a few months since I saw his videos explaining it, so I might be misremembering some of it, but that is the general idea. In Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, just across the state border from and a satellite city of Spokane, Washington, hundreds of people showed up with their guns to maintain the peace; Spokane burned, but Coeur d'Alene remains intact. Some useful-idiot protesters did try marching through with their signs, but it was a pathetic affair, as they were not as emboldened as their riotous counterparts in southern Idaho cities; some scout vehicles were driving around (this is my interpretation from watching livestream footage), but they ultimately did not organize a riot. Check out North Country Off Grid for footage from that event (videos titled "Antifa in the House", "Protecting the Neighborhood", and "Idaho welcome party") -- in one of the videos, a random woman offers her thanks to the militia men as she walks past. It is quite interesting.
    1
  4271. 1
  4272. 1
  4273. 1
  4274. 1
  4275. 1
  4276. 1
  4277. 1
  4278. 1
  4279. 1
  4280. 1
  4281. 1
  4282. 1
  4283. 1
  4284. 1
  4285. 1
  4286. 1
  4287. 1
  4288. 1
  4289. 1
  4290. 1
  4291. 1
  4292. 1
  4293. 1
  4294. 1
  4295. 1
  4296. 1
  4297. 1
  4298. 1
  4299. 1
  4300.  @Caitlin_TheGreat  Actually, if you look at the electoral college map from the last presidential election, it is clear that the vast majority of counties and municipalities supported Trump more than Hillary. The value of the nation is not merely the number of its citizens, regardless of what they do or where they live -- maybe it sounds a bit too tree-hugging hippy dippy, but the land contributes significantly to the health of the nation; in fact, if the whole country were like NYC or San Francisco, we would all have starved a long time ago. Considering how much the city dwelling Democrats rely upon the work of the food producing rural Republicans, it makes no sense to fully disenfranchise the majority of the nation's communities for the sake of "fairly representing" the will of those crazy enough to jam themselves into cramped cement boxes all over each other in NYC and then pay $5k a month in rent for that cramped cement box. If San Francisco votes away the water rights of the towns on its outskirts, is that somehow "fair" just because of the higher population? Without city folk paying exorbitant taxes from their proximity to the funny money banking warlords, farmers would arguably have shittier roads and fewer super carriers roaming the South Pacific on their behalf; without farmers producing food, city folk would have no food. You can't eat money, but money and waste are all that a city produces. Abolishing the electoral college would effectively mean that those farmers who grow all the food for the city folk no longer have any say in how the executive branch is run in this country -- disenfranchisement of the sharecroppers was tried by Jim Crow, and it was ended because it was a bad idea.
    1
  4301. 1
  4302. 1
  4303. 1
  4304. 1
  4305. 1
  4306. 1
  4307. 1
  4308. 1
  4309. 1
  4310. 1
  4311. 1
  4312. 1
  4313. 1
  4314. 1
  4315. 1
  4316. 1
  4317. 1
  4318. 1
  4319. 1
  4320. 1
  4321. 1
  4322. 1
  4323. 1
  4324. 1
  4325. 1
  4326. 1
  4327. 1
  4328. 1
  4329. 1
  4330. 1
  4331. 1
  4332. 1
  4333. 1
  4334. 1
  4335. 1
  4336. 1
  4337. 1
  4338. 1
  4339. 1
  4340. 1
  4341. 1
  4342. 1
  4343. 1
  4344. 1
  4345. 1
  4346. 1
  4347. 1
  4348. 1
  4349. 1
  4350. 1
  4351. 1
  4352. 1
  4353. 1
  4354. 1
  4355. 1
  4356. 1
  4357. 1
  4358. 1
  4359. 1
  4360. 1
  4361. 1
  4362. 1
  4363. 1
  4364. 1
  4365. 1
  4366. 1
  4367. 1
  4368. 1
  4369. 1
  4370. 1
  4371. 1
  4372. 1
  4373. 1
  4374. 1
  4375. 1
  4376. 1
  4377. 1
  4378. 1
  4379. 1
  4380. 1
  4381. 1
  4382. 1
  4383. 1
  4384. 1
  4385. 1
  4386. 1
  4387. 1
  4388. 1
  4389. 1
  4390. 1
  4391. 1
  4392. 1
  4393. 1
  4394. 1
  4395. 1
  4396. 1
  4397. 1
  4398. 1
  4399. 1
  4400. 1
  4401. 1
  4402. 1
  4403. 1
  4404. 1
  4405. 1
  4406. 1
  4407. 1
  4408. 1
  4409. 1
  4410. 1
  4411. 1
  4412. 1
  4413. 1
  4414. 1
  4415. 1
  4416. 1
  4417. 1
  4418. 1
  4419. 1
  4420. 1
  4421. 1
  4422. 1
  4423. 1
  4424. 1
  4425. 1
  4426. 1
  4427. 1
  4428. 1
  4429. 1
  4430. 1
  4431. 1
  4432. 1
  4433. 1
  4434. 1
  4435. 1
  4436. 1
  4437. 1
  4438. 1
  4439. 1
  4440. 1
  4441. 1
  4442. 1
  4443. 1
  4444. 1
  4445. 1
  4446. 1
  4447. 1
  4448. 1
  4449. 1
  4450. 1
  4451. 1
  4452. 1
  4453. 1
  4454. 1
  4455. 1
  4456. 1
  4457. 1
  4458. 1
  4459. 1
  4460. 1
  4461. 1
  4462. 1
  4463. 1
  4464. 1
  4465. 1
  4466. 1
  4467. 1
  4468. 1
  4469. 1
  4470. 1
  4471. 1
  4472. 1
  4473. 1
  4474. 1
  4475. 1
  4476. 1
  4477. 1
  4478. 1
  4479. 1
  4480. 1
  4481. 1
  4482. 1
  4483. 1
  4484. 1
  4485. 1
  4486. 1
  4487. 1
  4488. 1
  4489. 1
  4490. 1
  4491. 1
  4492. 1
  4493. 1
  4494. 1
  4495. 1
  4496. 1
  4497. 1
  4498. 1
  4499. 1
  4500. 1
  4501. 1
  4502. 1
  4503. 1
  4504. 1
  4505. 1
  4506. 1
  4507. 1
  4508. 1
  4509. 1
  4510. 1
  4511. 1
  4512. 1
  4513. @confucius12012  1. If you've done any hunting, you'll know that a kill shot does not guarantee an immediate pool of blood or even a discernable blood trail. 2. There is blood pooling under the right armpit/next to the torso of the guy in the center of the hall. The camera exposure adjustment accounts for the sudden appearance of the rest of the "streak" of blood, which is actually under the other guy's leg -- you may as well say that the outside world strangely came into existence and wasn't there previously. 3. It is a glass ornament in the flower bed (edit: on the rail around the flower bed). It is clearly visible as he walks in at 6:34-6:37 and again as he walks back in at 10:30. 4. Visible at 9:52; gone 10:26. Traffic cone in front of the gate was standing at 9:52 but has been knocked over from 11:44 on. People were escaping during the entire event; the car drove out suddenly, knocking over the cone, which is likely why he paused at 10:08 and gazed in the direction of that gate for a while. 5. Again, it was a glass ornament, and it was right there throughout the entire video. 6. Again, the entire outside world strangely isn't there and then is. Lighting mechanics be damned, the fake world is an outside job! 7. Again, it's a glass ornament. 8. He is likely still shooting at the first woman at 11:53, though we can't see due to camera angle. 9. & 10. The shoes coming off is the strangest thing in the video. Perhaps she had taken them off and was carrying them. We'll never know because he put a bullet in her shoulder and then in her head. My guess is that she slipped and fell (ground looked wet), but this one is definitely weird and the only objection that holds any merit.
    1
  4514. 1
  4515. 1
  4516. 1
  4517. 1
  4518. 1
  4519. 1
  4520. 1
  4521. 1
  4522. 1
  4523. 1
  4524. 1
  4525. 1
  4526. 1
  4527. 1
  4528. 1
  4529. 1
  4530. 1
  4531. 1
  4532. 1
  4533. 1
  4534. 1
  4535. 1
  4536. 1
  4537. 1
  4538. 1
  4539. 1
  4540. 1
  4541. 1
  4542. 1
  4543. 1
  4544. 1
  4545. 1
  4546. 1
  4547. 1
  4548. 1
  4549. 1
  4550. 1
  4551. 1
  4552. 1
  4553. 1
  4554. 1
  4555. 1
  4556. 1
  4557. 1
  4558. 1
  4559. 1
  4560. 1
  4561. 1
  4562. 1
  4563. 1
  4564. 1
  4565. 1
  4566. 1
  4567. 1
  4568. 1
  4569. 1
  4570. 1
  4571. 1
  4572. 1
  4573. 1
  4574. 1
  4575. 1
  4576. 1
  4577. 1
  4578. 1
  4579. 1
  4580. 1
  4581. 1
  4582. 1
  4583. 1
  4584. 1
  4585. 1
  4586. 1
  4587. 1
  4588. 1
  4589. 1
  4590. 1
  4591. 1
  4592. 1
  4593. 1
  4594. 1
  4595. 1
  4596. 1
  4597. 1
  4598. 1
  4599. 1
  4600. 1
  4601. 1
  4602. 1
  4603. 1
  4604. 1
  4605. 1
  4606. 1
  4607. 1
  4608. 1
  4609. 1
  4610. 1
  4611. 1
  4612. 1
  4613. 1
  4614. 1
  4615. 1
  4616. 1
  4617. 1
  4618. 1
  4619. 1
  4620. 1
  4621. 1
  4622. 1
  4623. 1
  4624. 1
  4625. 1
  4626. 1
  4627. 1
  4628. 1
  4629. 1
  4630. 1
  4631. 1
  4632. 1
  4633. 1
  4634. 1
  4635. 1
  4636. 1
  4637. 1
  4638. 1
  4639. 1
  4640. 1
  4641. 1
  4642. 1
  4643. 1
  4644. 1
  4645. 1
  4646. 1
  4647. 1
  4648. 1
  4649. 1
  4650. 1
  4651. 1
  4652. 1
  4653. 1
  4654. 1
  4655. 1
  4656. 1
  4657. 1
  4658. 1
  4659. 1
  4660. 1
  4661. 1
  4662. 1
  4663. 1
  4664. 1
  4665. 1
  4666. 1
  4667. 1
  4668. 1
  4669. 1
  4670. 1
  4671. 1
  4672. 1
  4673. 1