Comments by "WOR53L G" (@wor53lg50) on "Russia 'Captures' British-trained Commando; Foils Kyiv's Big 'Evil Plot' In Kherson | Watch" video.

@vinsok-wg7lh they were British trained islamists from londonstan..basically a different country within a country, blame the mayor..
2
 @rmdomainer9042smomsuckscocks time to help UK from tge Houties and others already in UK then!!.....You agree?..
1
@rmdomainer9042smomsuckscocks who mentioned ruskies??? I mean English, welsh, scots and Irish natives not bloody rusans...
1
He's a yankees plastic gupta not a ottoman..
1
@kylegill4932 the Angles (Anglo's) are the real English/Britons they seeked help from and married into their bloodline the Saxonic tribes to become Anglo-Saxons.... The Normans(Norseman)or men from the North, was of the same tribes aswell all had Vikings and saxon bloodlines that went back millenia's..the reason these North western Europeans DNA, cultures, ethnicitys are so intertwined and similar...
1
@kylegill4932 no the welsh was called wealas, welsh tribes from wales, anglos was angles English tribesfrom England(Angland)the scots was called Picts, Scottish tribes from Scotland , what is you dont get are you a thick idiot?.
1
Why take my reply down, no such place called wales back then, all classed as Brittania, tribes from that area was called wealas that merged together to become welsh or wales, angles was English tribes from that area Anglos, the northern tribes was called Picts now called Scotland..
1
@kylegill4932 the saxons are the ancient Britons that became the English and the, the welsh are from Scandinavian decent aswell as the normans, basically the same people as germanic tribes people saxons..funny how its only English get labelled with this over anglo saxons, also scots and Irish was occupied by Vikings and Normans, look if you dont know this history then maybe you shouldn't add your own warped opinion should you?..its like saying no native Indians or aboriginals to merica, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand can you see the logic now and how your fallacy falls short?..its like saying those natives who married and had children with European settlers cant be natives or have any rights to call themselves such, is that what you're saying?..im sure there be plenty of Maori and native Canadians and Americans with European last names who'd probably kick your teeth in for saying such..
1
@kylegill4932 so are many English and Scots, why keep hiding my replies, does the Truth hurt, they wasn't just wiped out was they, its impossible, the native Americans and Aboriginals wasnt just wiped out was they, or shouldn't they be classed as indigenous natives either, your logic is very warped and wrong, and you know it and cant argue any different the reason you hide my replies..also what does Albion mean?..
1
@kylegill4932 dont think so anything that to much to do with Roman would have been chased into the sea or dispatched after all the Elite and auxiliarys went..the reason hardly any if no Roman DNA shows up in ancient graves and the native population now..as in a small percentage like 2 to 5%, and that could have came from the Gauls or even the Gaels from Ireland through the Celtic regions of Iberia.
1
Not really as anything to do with Roman and the Elite or Gvmt would have been chased into the sea or dispatched after all the Auxiliarys left, only a tiny percentage of this DNA shows up in a tiny percentage of natives across UK and Ireland, and even this can be contributed to the Gauls or Celtic lands of Iberia, or even the Gaels from Ireland during Dal Riada which is probably where this tiny percentage of much further afield foreign DNA comes from as akin to Northern western European neighbouring tribes, you know like the Danes, jutes, saxons..or Normans..
1