Comments by "Ricardo Cabeza" (@ricardocabeza6006) on "BREAKING UPDATE on Trump's federal criminal trials" video.

  1. They probably feel similar to the thousands of officers and citizens that thought about the lack of accountability in the 2020 riots.
    5
  2. We didn't. That's just your imagination.
    3
  3. You mean the "only on day one" dictator?
    2
  4.  @ABitefLife  Nah, I only like people that can stay on a topic of a discussion instead of avoid reality.
    2
  5. Why do you hate democracy?
    2
  6. Why do you hate democracy?
    2
  7. Good. Your sense of justice was misguided the moment you supported a political prosecution.
    1
  8.  @MrMisuma  Every president in modern American history is a criminal. Don't start caring now simply so you can target the opposition.
    1
  9.  @MrMisuma  Every president in modern history is a criminal. Don't start caring now simply because you don't like who the president is.
    1
  10.  @MrMisuma  Every president in modern history is a criminal. Don't start caring now, simply because you don't like who the president is.
    1
  11.  @SkinnyRaccoon  You're exactly like the red hat people.
    1
  12.  @SkinnyRaccoon  You're saying the same things the red hat people said in 2020. You're exactly like them.
    1
  13. No, we have justice. It's just not for political prosecutions like you want.
    1
  14.  @edl6398  Every president in modern American history has broken laws. Don't start caring now, simply because you want your preferred side to be in power.
    1
  15. There is simply no version of reality were the secret service allows a state government to incarcerate the president-elect. You people are delusional.
    1
  16. He was indicted and convicted after he announced his presidential campaign. This was an effort to prevent him from winning the election. That effort failed. He won. It's time to respect democracy and drop the political prosecution.
    1
  17.  @JamesMiller-fx5yi  Let's not
    1
  18. Actually, the 2024 election makes a lot of sense in the context of the 2016 election. It's actually the 2020 election that is the anomaly that should be looked into... but you refuse to do that.
    1
  19. Will you please take your preference for political prosecutions with you? We don't want that here. Perhaps try Russia, they like incarcerating political opponents.
    1
  20. Because they don't prosecute your political opponents that you lost to in the election?
    1
  21. Tyranny such as a political party weaponizing the criminal justice system to prevent their political opponents from winning elections so they can remain in power? That kind of tyranny?
    1
  22. They are passionate about a political party... not about the rule of law.
    1
  23. No, it just turns out the legal system isn't for meant for political gain by prosecuting your opponents.
    1
  24.  @ronsullivan132  Why do you hate democracy?
    1
  25. Why do you hate democracy?
    1
  26.  @JTH-hm8ew  Oh, I guess you didn't hear. The civilian you want to lock up is the President-elect. Now tell me, why do you hate democracy? Why do you want to subvert democracy?
    1
  27. Yeah, that's why putin does it to his political opponents too.
    1
  28.  @619jasso  Please stop repeating nonsense. The officer that died, died from a stroke due to a preexisting medical condition. His family has been very clear about this. But you only hear the BS you want to hear, then repeat it. This is why you lost the election. But not sure you can think past your own bubble of ignorance.
    1
  29. You seem confused. Undocumented immigrants do not have the documentation required to get a mortgage or bank loan. I guess you don't have any grey matter, because you did not think this question through.
    1
  30.  @nomo-f3h  You mean migrants that went through the proper legal process?
    1
  31. So republicans should also start prosecuting their political opponents to try to prevent them from winning elections? Or should republicans ignore the democratically elected candidate and appoint a nominee instead? Because it seems like breaking those rules didn't go so well.
    1
  32.  @jimmymelendez1836  Maybe the change should be to not prosecute your political opponents. The majority of voters are tired of your nonsense.
    1
  33. We don't have "proof of innocence"... We have a presumption of innocence. Please educate yourself.
    1
  34.  @johnkoster2780  Well, he was indicted and prosecuted because he was attempting to gain political office. The political prosecution did not work. He still won the election. So now it's time to drop this nonsense. Time to respect democracy.
    1
  35.  @debbiekrpan7513  Why do you people want to lock up the winner of the election? Why do you all hate democracy?
    1
  36. Is this like the updates and clarifications on the election that misled you to believe Harris would win? Why do you trust someone that is clearly inaccurate and out of touch with reality?
    1
  37.  @dieSpinnt  You mean fascism such as attempting to incarcerate the president-elect to retain power and subvert democracy?
    1
  38.  @dieSpinnt  You mean fascism such as politically prosecuting the president-elect by incarcerating them and subverting democracy to retain power?
    1
  39. Don't worry... the majority of voters already know you want to prosecute the political opposition. That's why you lost the election.
    1