Comments by "Ricardo Cabeza" (@ricardocabeza6006) on "Forbes Breaking News" channel.

  1. Her life is not at risk. This is not a lifesaving abortion. That's not how Trisomy 18 works. No need to make stuff up to justify your opinions.
    16
  2. Who was the VP in 2014?
    4
  3. But then how would you explain that you need to purchase more from your military industrial complex buddies?
    4
  4. Find a judge...? It's the state's supreme court. Do you know what a supreme court is? You seem confused.
    3
  5. A medical situation where the life of the mother isn't at risk...? So this isn't actually about saving lives. Got it.
    3
  6.  @62mer ... I’m concerned the majority, which is dumb, will repeat 2008 by just wanting to “part of history” by electing to first woman. If she does run in 2024. I truly hope Candace Owens runs against her. It won’t go well for Kamala.
    3
  7. What about the three women on the Texas Supreme Court?
    3
  8.  @sarahmurrell115  If a baby is born with a fatal condition that was unnoticed in utero and will die weeks after it's birth, should we allow for the immediate termination when it's born? If not, why do you want babies to suffer more? (See how ridiculous your suffer argument is?)
    2
  9. Every officer has complaints. It’s a byproduct of doing a job where you have to interact with people that don’t want to be interacting with you.
    2
  10.  @Riverrockphotos  I like how you don't name the imaginary case. But I guess then, people would be able to actually fact check your misinformation.
    2
  11. Feel free to give the grown up explanation for necessity of broadband internet subsidized by the government.
    2
  12. Bad time to mention the three women on the Texas Supreme Court?
    2
  13. I like how in order to make your ridiculous argument work, you have to ignorantly assume every doctor agrees with your opinions about abortion. That's hilarious. Anymore anecdotal evidence you would like to use for wide inaccurate assumptions?
    2
  14. What book is no longer available for purchase?
    1
  15. Trisomy 18 doesn't pose a direct threat to the mother. No need to make stuff up.
    1
  16.  @erenyeager8306  Notice how you said the baby won't live...? Once again, there is not a direct threat to the mother.
    1
  17.  @erenyeager8306  The fetus isn't dead. What you're saying would be true if that were the case, but it is not.
    1
  18. What does the 14th Amendment Section 1-3 say about due process, given that holding office is a privilege of citizenship?
    1
  19. Yeah, it's really authoritarian to regulate the deliberate ending of human life.
    1
  20. I am unable to comprehend how people think her life is at risk from Trisomy 18
    1
  21. Probably because the majority of it's citizens elected representatives that don't approve of that personal right. But hey, keep pretending it's 65%.
    1
  22.  @stanleeger4711 ... Does murder typically have the victim foaming at the mouth and, claiming he could not breathe while alone in the car?
    1
  23.  @stanleeger4711 ... He was asked by two different people why he was foaming at the mouth. Just understand that in a criminal trial, the prosecution presents their argument. Then we have the defense present theirs. We haven’t even begun to hear the defense’s witnesses yet...
    1
  24.  @loftw_  There's no bodily autonomy when it involves ending human life. This is nothing new. Get real.
    1
  25.  @RealAdrianDittmann ... Hmm. So when I break my arm, I need broadband internet? Everyone knows Netflix and porn is the cure for a heart attack.
    1
  26.  @willieshoemaker8680  Section 1-3 of the 14th... Try actually reading it. Holding office is a privilege of citizenship.
    1
  27.  @robbiedemoss3224  What does the first sentence of the fifth amendment say? What does the 14th Amendment Section 1.3 say? Due process is important part of this.
    1
  28. The dire necessity of terminating a pregnancy to save a woman's life? No, that's not what's occurring. The baby has Trisomy 18, which is only fatal for the baby. She wants to abort the pregnancy to avoid birthing a child that will likely die weeks after birth. Due to her previous two deliveries, a third delivery will likely be her last. And she wants to preserve that third delivery for a healthy baby. Nothing about this situation is about saving her life. Don't make stuff up.
    1
  29. Given that the government is going with option #2. Where does your definition include wage increases and racial equity? According to White House dot gov, that would be included in his plan. Or are we just stuffing everything we can that feels good, under the umbrella of infrastructure?
    1
  30.  @huyphan2510  We aren't talking about doctors and vaccines. We are talking about doctors and the morality of ending human life when another life is not at risk. That is vastly different from the vaccine nonsense. Fact is that many doctors do not support the ability to end human life when the mother's life is not at risk. Many doctors find it appalling to needlessly end human life, given that their entire identity is based on saving lives. Please, stay on topic.
    1
  31.  @huyphan2510  Like the rest of the nation, physicians' views on this extremely emotional issue are more nuanced than topline results might suggest. Roughly 1 in 4 physicians surveyed (prior to the release of the draft) supported the right to abortion at any time. Others would restrict abortions to the first (13%) or second (11%) trimesters. Thirty-two percent said third trimester abortions should be allowed only when there is an outstanding medical reason, and 18% said abortion should be permitted only to save the life of the mother or in the case of incest or rape. Only 3% of those surveyed said abortion should never be allowed. -Medscape 5/25/22 Now tell me, what's 32 plus 18....?
    1
  32.  @user-qc6cf2ez2k  "These very necessary cases" are precisely what I'm talking about. Try reading my comment again. I'm talking about scenarios where it's necessary to save the woman's life.
    1
  33. What does Section 1.3 of the 14th Amendment say about due process, given that holding office is a privilege of citizenship? Or did you not read it?
    1
  34. You mean the "don't say straight" bill?
    1
  35. You should try reading the 14th. Specifically Section1-3, which covers due process. Holding office is a privilege of citizenship.
    1
  36. Just wait until Jan. 20th, 2023. The day Kamala can become president and still have eligibility to run for president for two terms. Ten years total (9 years, 364 days)... 😳
    1
  37. What does the 14th Amendment Section 1-3 say about due process? Given that holding office is a privilege of citizenship.
    1