General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Ricardo Cabeza
CNBC Television
comments
Comments by "Ricardo Cabeza" (@ricardocabeza6006) on "Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp responds to backlash against its new voting restrictions" video.
Who are these adults showing up to vote that are incapable of providing food and water for themselves?
6
I’m more worried about who these adults are that are not capable of feeding and hydrating themselves...
4
@nickking9568 ... Both sides are guilty of selectively referencing it. Congress has legislated so many holes in that document, it wouldn’t blow away in a wind storm.
3
Who is the “they” that is legally an adult, that is incapable of feeding and hydrating themselves?
3
Section 18 of the bill (SB202) directly addresses this issue. And the one drop box per country is an increase from the requirement of zero. The bill is publicly available for everyone to read. Please educate yourself on the bill and the facts before parroting a tribal narrative. Simply because you don’t like the letter that comes after the governor’s name.
3
Hahahaha. You expect people who didn’t read the bill to read that old document?
2
Good thing Section 18 of this bill you didn’t read addresses the issues in high traffic precincts.
2
You can try reading the US constitution...
2
@plop199 ... It states in the constitution each state legislature is responsible for conducting their election. Thus, states are allowed to establish ID laws if they want. However, there is another amendment that specifically states it shall not be infringed, yet you likely support restrictions and requirements on this right.
1
Must be why the bill increases the number of voting machines at locations or increases the number of precincts, in high volume areas. Feel free to actually read Section 18 of the bill (SB202), rather than parroting a narrative.
1
Hahaha. Try reading the bill. The law now requires each county a minimum of one... this is an increase from zero...
1
Must be why Section 18 of the bill you didn’t read addresses the issue of high traffic precincts...
1
Yes. Backlash from people who haven’t read the bill and fixate on the letter that follows his name.
1
@staysafe3618 ... But Brawndo has what plants crave...
1
@Weltall8000 ... Must be why Section 18 of the bill you didn’t read addresses the issues in high traffic precincts.
1
@Weltall8000 ... I’m sorry. Let me break it down for your smooth brain. Section 18, of SB202 which you did not read. Actually addresses the issues causing people to wait 8+ hours in line to vote. There is no need for “refreshments” if wait times to vote are diminished. In addition to the fact, you are an adult if you’re voting. You should be capable of bringing your own refreshments, if you desire, regardless of wait time.
1
@Weltall8000 ... So then please tell me what you said... and how I didn’t address it. Otherwise, I want what you’re smoking.
1
@Weltall8000 ... And I believe my response included the fact that the issue of having long lines is actually addressed in the bill. High volume precincts will receive more voting machines or split into new precincts increasing voting locations. You would know this if you actually read section 18 of the bill. But instead, you want to complain about passing out water. Sounds like you want to disenfranchise voters by preventing this increase in machines and locations. But then again, it makes sense. Jim Crow was a Democrat after all.
1
Wow. Did you just attempt to make a point by combining “literally just” and “basically with”?....
1
Fun fact: It works well on cleaning corroded car battery terminals but, it doesn’t have to be brand specific.
1
According to democrats. Black people are not capable of this.
1
Check out the history of yellow journalism. You’ll probably find it interesting.
1
@melaniegreufe640 ... Are you the woke white person that yells black lives matter at a black cop? You might want to check the demographics of Atlanta PD. You also might like Section 18 of the bill you didn’t read. It addresses issues at high volume precincts.
1
I bet you can’t cite the specific sections you have issues with... just parroting narratives.
1
@hardstyle8184 ... Hope you realize State Legislatures were given that power by the Constitution, a long long time ago.
1
@kbstrong429 ... Oh yeah how so?
1
So you don’t like that the bill requires every county to have a drop box?... Or do you just not like the letter that follows the governor’s name?
1
Imagine what you’d learn if you actually read the bill instead of parroted a narrative.
1
@Danaman62 ... Try reading the facts in Section 18 and 26. But I guess since you are not supporting this bill. You don’t support an increase in locations or machines in high traffic areas with long wait times. Or the new requirement of at least one drop box per county, and increase from zero required. It’s sad that you don’t support these communities being able to vote easier. But I guess not much has changed with Democrats. After all, Jim Crow was one.
1
@Danaman62 ... Can we agree people don’t need food and water if there are no long lines? Which is what Section 18 of the bill addresses. Also, who are these legal adults that are not capable of providing food and hydration for themselves? You simply don’t like the letter that follows the governor’s name. It has nothing to do with the contents of the bill. And I would think someone who is a democrat would be proud if the reduction in paper used during elections by in person digital voting. But I guess you aren’t worried about trees anymore, so we will mail out millions of pieces of paper.
1
@Danaman62 ... You don’t have to buy it. You just have to read it... SB202 Section 18
1
Hey look! Another bill you didn’t read.
1
@jamesricker3997 ... You understand their state legislation has not always been Republican. Right? Or do you want to keep playing political pretend time? However, feel free to name the specific section you disagree with, of the publicly available bill you didn’t read.
1