Comments by "Ricardo Cabeza" (@ricardocabeza6006) on "Anti-woke in shambles, drag ban ruled unconstitutional" video.

  1. It’s not a dress code law. It’s about prurient performances in the public and around minors. But you couldn’t be bothered to read both pages of the very short bill, could you?
    3
  2.  @celinematerzok6421  But... this bill specially prohibits prurient performances. Do you think prurient performances should be witnessed by minors? If not, then you agree with the bill’s premise.
    2
  3. Oh big pharma loves the trans community. People who were never on pharmaceuticals are making a decision to need pharmaceuticals for the rest of their life. And big pharma loves it.
    1
  4. You didn’t read the bill... did you?
    1
  5.  @KanadianRaven  Well, the bill actually says “male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest”... Your cute article seems to be deliberately missing the “prurient” detail of this law. Now, is there a reason you couldn’t be bothered to simply read the two page bill?
    1
  6.  @afry6400  So why are you upset, when this bill simply ensures exactly what you’re describing? Why are you pretending it’s anti drag, when in fact it’s specifically about prurient performances? Have you considered simply reading the two pages of this bill?
    1
  7.  @olivekatz9139  Why don’t you just read the bill? Then you’d realize a comedic performance by a male or female impersonator would not be illegal. Yet, you want to pretend it would be. Why do you insist on pretending for the sake of outrage?
    1
  8. Oh cool! You didn’t read this bill at all. You just want to be outraged for the sake of outrage.
    1
  9. What does any of that have to do with prurient performances, which is what the bill says. Is there a reason you can’t be bothered to read both pages of it?
    1
  10. So prurient performances in the presence of minors is your first amendment right?
    1
  11.  @G_Demolished  Do you think minors should attend prurient performances...? Simple yes or no question.
    1
  12.  @alexandredesmarais3848  There are already laws in place to prohibit showing such things to children. And this bill amends that specific law to include “prurient” performances. You’d know this if you actually take a few minutes to read the two page bill... FFS.
    1
  13.  @dangerouslydubiousdoubleda9821  This law is specific to prurient performances. Try reading the bill. It’s very short.
    1
  14.  @mantispunch  It’s pretty simple really. If a child watches the movie ‘Mrs. Doubtfire’... that would be acceptable. But if you want to impersonate a female while twerking on stage to Cardi B.... that would not be acceptable. Understand the difference yet?
    1
  15.  @dangerouslydubiousdoubleda9821  Dictionaries exist. Try using one.
    1
  16.  @mantispunch  Did I say those were the only type of drag shows that exist? No, I did not. But that’s an example of a prurient one, that would have to be for private 18+ audiences. Family friendly would not be prurient. Why are you struggling so much with the definition of this word?
    1
  17.  @mantispunch  Well... Yes. Because drag is a specific form of female impersonation that relies on over sexualized mimicking of females, such as emphasized breasts and hips. Especially when there are videos of drag queens teaching children what twerking is. So yes, this would all be considered a prurient of female impersonation. However, such movies as ‘Mrs. Doubtfire’ which involves female impersonation, is not prurient. However, you are fully aware of this difference. You know it’s actually not vague at all. Sadly, you just want to pretend like it’s vague for the sake of tribalism.
    1
  18. @Alexis' Gaming You didn’t ready the one and half page bill... did you? Why are you too lazy to bother reading it? And why are you now spreading false information about the bill you didn’t read?
    1
  19. @Alexis' Gaming I did indeed ignore your frivolous red herring argument. Now, can you please stop averting the topic at hand? Let’s focus on the bill you didn’t read, yet are spreading incorrect information about.
    1
  20. @Alexis' Gaming Let’s start with facts first. Can you please tell me where trans people are listed in the bill you still haven’t read?
    1
  21.  @blizz2748  Umm. You’re incorrect. Clearly you have not read this very short two page bill. As what it specially states is... “male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest” Why are you deliberately spreading misinformation?
    1
  22. Is this the 1960s? Why are you calling them colored people?
    1
  23. Was it prurient? Because that’s what this bill specially prevents. Try reading Tennessee SB3. It’s only two pages long.
    1
  24.  @dangerouslydubiousdoubleda9821  There’s a thing called a dictionary... give it a try sometime.
    1
  25.  @dangerouslydubiousdoubleda9821  It’s not subjective. There’s a vast difference between the movie ‘Mrs. Doubtfire’ and the drag shows at night clubs. But you know there’s a difference, you just want to feign ignorance for the sake of tribalism.
    1
  26.  @dangerouslydubiousdoubleda9821  Can you please clarify why you think minors seeing prurient performances is a good thing?
    1
  27. Are those things prurient...? If so, why do you want it around minors? As that’s what this bill specifically prohibits.
    1
  28.  @KaeMcSpadden  What if you actually read the bill, and looked up the word “prurient”...? You really seem to be failing to grasp what the law states, as none of what you listed would be prohibited by the law.
    1
  29.  @KaeMcSpadden  Not really. The movie ‘Mrs. Doubtfire’ isn’t prurient. However, impersonating a female with over sexualized characteristics while twerking on stage to Cardi B... would be prurient. But of course, you know there is a difference between these two things. You’re simply feigning ignorance for the sake of tribalism.
    1
  30.  @KaeMcSpadden  This isn’t about attending one or not... this about minors witnessing a prurient performance. If it’s family friendly, that wouldn’t be prurient. Why are you struggling so much with the definition of this word?
    1
  31.  @KaeMcSpadden  So you think prurient performances (not family friendly) seen by minors should be legal? Can you please explain your moral reason as to why that should be legal?
    1
  32.  @KaeMcSpadden  Because it wasn’t until recently that such performers as the “rainbow d!ldo butt monkey” are in libraries. Or videos of drag performers teaching elementary age kids about twerking. Until recently, this type of adult content was only at establishments meant for adults. And I’ll ask again, can you please explain your moral reason as to why that should be legal?
    1
  33.  @KaeMcSpadden  Why can’t you simply explain your moral reason for wanting this to be legal? Why is this acceptable to you? Should we also make strip clubs legal to minors, and leave it up to the parents?
    1
  34.  @KaeMcSpadden  That’s wonderful you’ve been to those. It sounds like the ones you have been to are family friendly and therefore not a prurient performance. So those would not be prohibited under this law. Now, can you please explain your moral reasoning for wanting minors at drag shows which involve prurient performances...? Please stop averting this question.
    1
  35.  @KaeMcSpadden  So bad parenting is the moral reason you support minors witnessing prurient performances?
    1
  36. What are you talking about? This bill specifically states “male and female impersonators”... Seems like you couldn’t bother to read the bill that’s only two pages long.
    1
  37. So prurient performances in public and around minors is equality?
    1
  38. Can you please explain how prurient performances in front of minors is a constitutional right? As that’s what this bill actually prohibits.
    1
  39.  @Bmanritchie  Are the cheerleaders “topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest, or similar entertainers, regardless of whether or not performed for consideration”...?
    1
  40. No, what’s amazing is how upset you get when you can’t have prurient performances in front of minors.
    1
  41. Gay marriage back in the day wasn’t having prurient performances in front of minors. Nice false comparison though!
    1
  42.  @papercup2517  You didn’t actually read the legislation. Did you?
    1
  43.  @papercup2517  Why can’t you be bothered to read it? It’s only one and a half pages long... Is that too much reading for you?
    1
  44.  @papercup2517  So you have time to watch a video, then comment multiple times on said video... but you don’t have time to read one and a half pages? Why are you intellectually lazy?
    1
  45. So it’s persecution if you can’t have prurient performances in front of minors...? As that’s what this bill prohibits.
    1
  46. How is performing in a prurient manner around minors a first amendment right?
    1
  47. They fought back to be able to have prurient performances in front of children, as that’s what this law specifically prohibits. That’s a weird thing to fight for.
    1
  48.  @ImpeccableLiving  You didn’t read what the bill actually prohibits... did you? Why can’t you be bothered to read the very short two page bill?
    1
  49.  @ImpeccableLiving  Nope. It was for you.
    1
  50. You didn’t read the bill... did you? It’s only too pages, but you can’t be bothered to read it. And instead you want to just spread misinformation.
    1
  51.  @axel-daxel  You are absolutely correct. That’s why this law specially applies to prurient performances. You didn’t read the two page bill... did you?
    1
  52. And is it legal to distribute it to minors, or show it in public? As that’s what this law is about.
    1
  53. No... Prurient performances are not acceptable in public or around minors. And that’s what this bill specifically prohibits. Yet, rather than reading the two page bill, you want to talk about repressed memories. Seems like you might be projecting. Therapy could help you with those repressed memories.
    1
  54. Can you please specify why prurient performances in front of minors is your first amendment right? As that’s what this law specifically prohibits.
    1
  55.  @notchomomma239  Ok... I’ll ask again. Can you please specify why prurient performances in front of minors is your first amendment right? At no point in your response did you explain how that action is a protected right. Please, explain why.
    1
  56.  @notchomomma239  Roth v. United States
    1
  57. How is preventing minors from witnessing prurient performances irrational? Please, make it make sense.
    1
  58. Minors attending a cabaret show is protected by the first amendment...?
    1
  59.  @CPsWalkThroughs  So when this channels audience regularly says they hate republicans... they are engaging in hate speech?
    1
  60. Well, do plays in school involve “topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest, or similar entertainers, regardless of whether or not performed for consideration”...? As the law states.
    1
  61. With your logic... Brown v. Board of Education would never have overturned Plexi v. Ferguson, and school segregation would still be around.
    1
  62.  @jasonkinzie8835  What constitutional amendment allows you to perform in a prurient manner in front of minors? As that’s what this law actually prohibits.
    1
  63. Why do you want to be someone performing in a prurient manner around minors? Because that’s all this bill prevents. I guess the two pages were too much for you to try to read.
    1
  64.  @angie99656  Can you please explain why you want prurient performances in public or around minors? As that’s what this bill specifically prohibits.
    1
  65.  @monicarenee7949  I guess you didn’t read the bill...? Otherwise, you’d realize that this amends the current indecency law by updating the text. Now, can you specifically tell me what the new text says that you don’t like? Try reading it and directly quoting the part you disagree with.
    1
  66. How is preventing minors from attending cabaret shows considered hate...?
    1
  67.  @gattaca5911  From the text of the bill... “Adult cabaret performance" means a performance in a location other than an adult cabaret that features topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest, or similar entertainers, regardless of whether or not performed for consideration; And a minor is a person that is not an adult, or under 18. This is basic knowledge.
    1
  68.  @afry6400  Here is what this particular law says. Where is the issue? This isn’t trans or drag specific like you want to pretend it is. Just read TN SB3. It’s two pages long. (1) It is an offense for a person to engage in an adult cabaret performance: (A) On public property; or (B) In a location where the adult cabaret performance could be viewed by a person who is not an adult.
    1
  69.  @gattaca5911  And where are cheerleaders mentioned in the bill? Can you please quote it, rather than ignorantly parrot the same nonsense your ideological peers do?
    1
  70.  @gattaca5911  The law states “topless dancers, go-go dancers, exotic dancers, strippers, male or female impersonators who provide entertainment that appeals to a prurient interest, or similar entertainers, regardless of whether or not performed for consideration”... So yes, some types of drag shows, that are prurient, would be prohibited. As you can see, cheerleaders are not listed. Try actually reading the bill. Then tell me why you support minors attending prurient performances.
    1
  71.  @gattaca5911  And... silence. As expected.
    1
  72.  @gattaca5911  So if you go to a nightclub, see a girl employed to dance on a stage at the nightclub... Do you say “Look! A cheerleader!” See buddy, it’s almost like they are two different words to describe two different things. If you want specific definitions, google is your friend. Anymore asinine retorts?
    1
  73. So minors being able to witnessing prurient performances, is common sense?
    1
  74. Were you performing in a prurient manner...? If not, then you would not be a criminal according to this bill. Why can’t you be bothered to just read the two page long bill? Why do you insist on just spreading misinformation, rather than read it first?
    1
  75.  @trishayamada807  Does it involve prurient performances? Because that’s all this bill would prevent.
    1
  76.  @trishayamada807  And can you please explain why you want prurient performances to be seen by minors? As that’s what this bill specifically prohibits.
    1
  77.  @trishayamada807  If people don’t take their minor children to these shows, and that’s precisely what the law prohibits. Why are you upset about it? Seems like you agree with the law.
    1
  78. So prurient performances in our live or around minors is sane? Please, make it make sense.
    1
  79.  @simongiles9749  Pantomime isn’t a prurient performance, as the bill specifically prohibits. Try actually reading the bill. It’s only two pages.
    1
  80. How is prurient performances in front of minors protected by the constitution? Please, make it make sense.
    1
  81.  @TheOfficialTarynTots  Do you have trouble articulating your own thoughts?
    1
  82.  @TheOfficialTarynTots  So you are incapable of explaining how it falls under the first amendment, yet you accept it does because it’s the outcome you want, regardless of the actual reasoning?
    1
  83.  @TheOfficialTarynTots  There’s no debate. I just want to hear you explain, in your own words, how the bill you did not read violates the first amendment. And it’s difficult to believe you are capable of it, when you have spent numerous comments averting it.
    1
  84. So it’s your constitutional right to perform in a prurient manner in public or around minors?
    1