Comments by "Ricardo Cabeza" (@ricardocabeza6006) on "Beto Crushes Heckler: It's May Be Funny to You, Motherfu#u0026er" video.

  1. Every gun owner in Texas that’s even slightly educated on firearms, knows what Beto said was hilarious, ignorant and incorrect. Good luck to him with that.
    2
  2.  @masterghotihook5793  Aww. How cute. You’re the kind of person that doesn’t realize Marx and Engels used the terms socialism and communism interchangeably, then pretends they are different.
    2
  3. If he is a “smart, Sharp dude- doesn’t miss a beat”... why is he ignorantly stating a .223 can penetrate an enemy helmet at 500ft? This is why he is laughed at. This is why you are laughed at. But I guess your ignorance on the subject is bliss. Now you can just believe whatever BS is spouted by people you tribally support.
    1
  4. Well watch it one more time. And notice how Beto is laughed at for his ignorant and incorrect statement about the ballistic capabilities of a .223 by saying it can “penetrate an enemy helmet at 500ft”... Why do you think such laughable ignorance is a good thing? Furthermore, why is an aggressive response to laughing at that ignorance and incorrect statement a good thing?
    1
  5. I laughed out loud the moment he said “penetrate an enemy helmet at 500ft”... It’s kind of hard not to laugh at such an ignorant statement. It’s even illegal to deer hunt in my state with a .223, due to its low ballistic energy.
    1
  6. It’s hard not to laugh when you’re so ignorant on the subject of firearms. You make up BS. Penetrate an enemy helmet 500ft away?... it’s a .223 FFS.
    1
  7. Thankfully, along with the guy in the crowd, most of Texas is also laughing at Beto’s ignorant and incorrect statement about the ballistic capabilities of a .223. It’s not going to “penetrate an enemy helmet at 500ft”. Yet you applaud Beto’s ignorance because you are also ignorant.
    1
  8. Balls? So it takes balls to parrot ignorant and false rhetoric, then when laughed at for said ignorance, you double down with aggression?
    1
  9. Yes. People cheering for ignorant and incorrect statements about guns are indeed deplorable.
    1
  10. So the left needs someone that responds aggressively, when laughed at for making incorrect and ignorant statements? Interesting.
    1
  11.  @VengefulAngeI  So cursing at someone that thinks your ignorant and incorrect statement is funny, isn’t aggressive?
    1
  12. Yeah... except he’s swinging back at something he’s objectively wrong about. A .223 isn’t “penetrating an enemy helmet at 500ft”... Unfortunately due to your own ignorance, you view his ignorance as a strength.
    1
  13.  @georgespinks1  Watch the video again buddy... the person laughs when Beto says a .223 can “penetrate an enemy helmet at 500ft”. Which is an ignorant, incorrect and laughable statement.
    1
  14.  @georgespinks1  What caliber round do you think most AR-15s are chambered for?... See, this is your ignorance on the subject. Also, pay attention to where my quotes are in my comment. Or is reading also difficult for you? Maybe your struggles with reading and comprehending what portion of a comment is a quote explains why you choose to remain ignorant on the subject of firearms. In a modern world of digital communication and information at our finger tips, you willfully choose to remain ignorant on a subject you want to regulate. Why?
    1
  15.  @georgespinks1  So why do you want to remain willfully ignorant on a subject, yet attempt to regulate it? Would it not be more logical to educate yourself on a subject so you know precisely how to regulate it?
    1
  16.  @bomblade15  Your ignorance is what’s funny.
    1
  17.  @arceyominyin  Why are you supporting incorrect statements? Is it simply because they fit your narrative? Why shouldn’t you laugh at blatant ignorance with that level of confidence?
    1
  18.  @django3422  So why did the guy laugh immediately after Beto’s ignorant statement? Oh yeah, because it’s laughably ignorant. But sure, pretend he was laughing about kids dying to fit your narrative.
    1
  19.  @django3422  I don’t know. You tell me. You’re the one ignoring reality.
    1
  20. Nutjob?... No, the nutjobs are the people that ignorantly think a .223 can “penetrate an enemy helmet at 500ft”... FFS.
    1
  21. When did Trump brag about grabbing lady parts at a town hall event?
    1
  22. So you think it’s a good thing that someone says something incorrect and ignorant. Then doubles down with aggressive language? Interesting.
    1
  23.  @dennisrohatyn7782  So why is everyone in this comment section applauding Beto’s aggressive response to being laughed at for his ignorant and incorrect statement about the capabilities of a .223?
    1
  24.  @dennisrohatyn7782  Wow. Absolutely nothing you stated changes physics. Therefore the ballistics capabilities of a 223 remain unchanged. Congratulations.
    1
  25. But the enemy will be laugh in their helmet 500ft away. Because it’s not penetrating one. It’s laughable that Beto thinks it can. And it’s absolutely hilarious that you’re too ignorant to know differently and pretend Beto is so great for his ignorance.
    1
  26. So it’s good to respond aggressively when laughed at for ignorant and incorrect statements?
    1
  27. Thankfully, Beto’s ignorant and incorrect rhetoric about firearms will not work in Texas. They are not ignorant about firearms, like you are.
    1
  28.  @donutdouglas67  What’s the pun?
    1
  29.  @charlesswenson259  So making an argument about making certain guns illegal due to their capabilities, while blatantly lying about said capabilities that your using to justify said bans, is ok? So now we can just make up BS to justify the laws we want? Seriously?
    1
  30.  @charlesswenson259  It’s not twisting words. You just said, “Because he was wrong about a weapons exact specifications does not take away from what he has to say.” And what Beto has to say is, the weapons should be banned due to said specifications. Specifications which he is wrong about. Do you think it would be a valid argument if someone stated cars should be banned because they can go 400mph?
    1
  31.  @donutdouglas67  Oh wow. He really is! I had no clue. Must be because he’s not a Democrat, otherwise we’d definitely hear how brave he is...
    1
  32. So ignorantly stating a .223 can penetrate an enemy helmet at 500ft is spot on? It’s illegal in my state to hunt with a basic AR-15, because most are built for a .223, which is an illegal caliber for deer due to its lack of energy. Aka, it’s more likely to wound than kill. It’s not going through an armored helmet. FFS.
    1
  33. So you view his “fearlessness” as a strength, when he’s being laughed at for an ignorant and incorrect statement about firearms? A .223 isn’t “penetrating an enemy helmet at 500ft”... But at least due to your own ignorance, you view Beto’s ignorance as a strength. Good job.
    1
  34. So you think it’s good that he is “‘more tough on these @$$holes” when he’s making ignorant and incorrect statements about firearms that are laughable? A .223 isn’t “penetrating an enemy helmet at 500ft”... Unfortunately, you are also ignorant about firearms, so you believe the BS coming out of Beto’s mouth.
    1
  35. You’re yearning for Democrats that fight when they are laughed at for making ignorant and incorrect statements about firearms?
    1
  36. @F. Friedrich Kling Hauss So I’m a hypocrite because Beto ignorantly and incorrectly states a .223 is capable of penetrating an enemy helmet at 500ft? He was rightfully laughed at for such an absurd statement. And David’s audience cheers on Beto’s aggressive defense of his ignorance. It’s astounding to witness this.
    1
  37. @F. Friedrich Kling Hauss What caliber do you think an AR-15 is chambered for?... Thank you for demonstrating your ignorance.
    1
  38. Well those of us intelligent enough to comprehend ballistics, will continue to laugh at the ignorant statements Beto is making. “Penetrate an enemy helmet at 500ft”... is hilarious and incorrect. But you’re too ignorant on the subject to know Beto is spouting BS.
    1
  39. You’re proud of a laughably ignorant and incorrect statement about the ballistic capabilities of a .223?
    1
  40. It’s appropriate to respond aggressively to someone laughing at an ignorant and incorrect statement about the ballistic capabilities of a .223?
    1
  41.  @rockhoundtg  So being ignorant and incorrect about a subject is a good thing?
    1
  42.  @henrytawnn8694  The fact you’re more interested in the guns are bad narrative, than objective facts about their actual capabilities, says everything we need to know.
    1
  43. Thankfully most of Texas will also laugh at his ignorant and incorrect statements about the capabilities of a .223.
    1
  44. No, they actually just know a thing or two about firearms. And realize a .223 “penetrating an enemy helmet at 500ft” is an absurd and laughable statement.
    1
  45. But you have to admit. It’s really hard not to laugh at the ignorant and incorrect rhetoric he’s spouting. But you don’t know any better because you’re ignorant about firearms. So you think Beto’s ignorance is a strength.
    1
  46.  @a.jdeets5527  He is wrong. A .223 is not going to “penetrate an enemy helmet at 500ft.”
    1
  47. Ignorance? How about the ignorance that a .223 cannot “penetrate an enemy helmet at 500ft”. But nope, you don’t care about that ignorance. Nor do you care about your own ignorance, that makes you think Beto made a good point.
    1
  48. Thankfully people in Texas know what Beto is saying is laughably ignorant. Therefore he has no chance in Texas.
    1
  49. No he doesn’t. Because he said ignorance and incorrect things about guns, then was laughed at for it. Unfortunately, you see his aggressive reaction to his ignorant statement as a strength. Imagine someone trying to outlaw cars. But everytime they talk about it, they claim cars go 300mph and are unsafe. Then a room full of people cheer for this statement. That’s what it’s like watching every democrat candidate talk about firearms. They clearly have no idea what they are talking about.
    1
  50. So when you are laughed at for making ignorant and incorrect statements, you should respond aggressively?
    1
  51. Yes. Sadly, he really does believe a .223 can “penetrate an enemy helmet at 500ft”... I guess ignorance has no bounds.
    1
  52. Accept reality?... Reality is a .223 isn’t “penetrating an enemy helmet at 500ft”... Nor are AR-15s sold in stores a mil-spec riffle. But hey, keep parroting ignorant and incorrect things. And we will keep laughing at you for it.
    1