General statistics
List of Youtube channels
Youtube commenter search
Distinguished comments
About
Ricardo Cabeza
David Pakman Show
comments
Comments by "Ricardo Cabeza" (@ricardocabeza6006) on "TRUMP WINS: Criminal trial postponed INDEFINITELY" video.
Let us all keep front of mind... that all this is just political theater.
7
@brassman7599 Your "clear examples" are your opinions as a result of your upset feelings... And they are indeed irrelevant.
3
You could have watched a movie review, watched a craft, or even learned about weather patterns... but no, you chose a Trump video when you got on YouTube. You love him, you are obsessed and addicted.
3
So when things don't go the way you want, it's corruption?
2
You seem like the type of person that checks under their bed every night for "him and his thugs"...
2
People like you are fascinating. I honestly thought the 9-0 Supreme Court decision to keep Trump on the ballots would have given you pause, given that it was a unanimous decision even from democrat appointed justices. But nope, your hubris won't allow it.
2
@myles5158 So you think all nine justices on the supreme court are incorrect in their decision? You think you understand the constitution better than Justices appointed by Biden and Obama?
2
So when you don't get what you want, it's corruption?
2
You sound exactly like the red hat people when they talk about impeachments.
1
Well... then things aren't looking too good for your preferred outcome.
1
Yes, obviously. Anytime you don't get what you want, it's clearly just corruption.
1
@brassman7599 If my comment doesn't make sense to you, it's because you are unwilling to accept reality. It's easier for you to make up nonsense to discredit my comment, so you can continue to avoid reality.
1
@StinkCabbage ты дурак, что переводишь это
1
@brassman7599 Notice how you are making a generic claim without specific examples? You could easily quote a word used incorrectly. But no, you keep your accusation generic so you can avoid reality.
1
Banana Republic? So Biden was placed into power by a foreign government, in order for that foreign country to ensure availability to our commercial exports?
1
@RC-tn3xo Notice how the OP says they want to avoid Trump...? Where have I said the same about Pakman?
1
@thesamsquatch2704 You know there have been zero charges against him for an insurrection... right?
1
@thesamsquatch2704 True, there is video footage of him saying they will march over... AND make their voices peacefully and patriotically heard. But you conveniently want to leave that detail out.
1
@thesamsquatch2704 Given that your accusation is that he incited an insurrection. It's not about what they did. It's about what he said. He said to peacefully make their voices heard, didn't he?
1
@thesamsquatch2704 Cultist? Trump is a moron, just like you. Grab a dictionary sometime and learn what "incite" means. Clearly you are not familiar with that word.
1
A year ago you were all busy creaming your pants over the charges. You didn't predict anything.
1
@StinkCabbage Why are the Justices appointed by Obama and Biden holding wealthy people to a different standard? Please expound on your ridiculous claim.
1
@RC-tn3xo Trying to sound educated? I'm just trying to talk about the 9-0 Supreme Court decision. Would you like to talk about that, or would you like to continue to avoid that topic?
1
@ninadaly7639 Google can help you be more informed about the topics being discussed here. Try that, then come back.
1
@StinkCabbage Why are the Justices appointed by Obama and Biden holding wealthy people to a different standard? Come on, don't avoid the question. Expound on the claim you made.
1
@StinkCabbage I thought I was Russian? Now I'm just a bot? Come on, stop avoiding the question with nonsense and just answer it. Expound on your ridiculous claim.
1
@StinkCabbage You are still avoiding my question. Your comment said, "No all it proves is that rich conmen are held to a different standard"... That was your response to my comment about the 9-0 decision. Your comment did not mention "other cases"... Given that was your response, why are the Justices appointed by Obama and Biden holding wealthy people to a different standard in the 9-0 ruling? Stop avoiding the question and don't pretend you were talking about something else. Just answer it and expound on your absurd claim.
1
@StinkCabbage You are correct. I did bring up the 9-0 ruling. And your reply to my comment about the 9-0 ruling was what I quoted. Again, you made no mention of other cases in your reply. You are just pretending you meant something different to avoid expounding on your ridiculous claim. And good for Led Zeppelin. I have no idea what you are even referencing in that comment. This is not a discussion about weed. Are you feeling ok?
1
@StinkCabbage You might want to call a friend to perform a welfare check on you.
1
Well yes, we all know this is just political theater. All the criminal charges are designed to impede his ability to campaign, conviction is not the goal and is unlikely for every charge.
1
Is it? Or are you just on the wrong side again? Like the 9-0 Supreme Court decision to keep Trump on the ballot. You were probably upset about that too.
1
@APissedOffVeteran So when exactly did Trump sneak back into government facilities for this alleged document heist... if he was "not the commander in chief when he stole them"
1
@James-cu9ul It shouldn't break your heart... But it should give you pause and consideration that you are on the wrong side of this.
1
Probably because you don't understand how the judicial branch functions.
1
Could you imagine being a grown adult and not understanding the powers held by the office of the president, specifically in regards to classified information? Oh wait, you don't have to imagine.
1