Comments by "Ricardo Cabeza" (@ricardocabeza6006) on "Louisiana Passes Draconian Abortion Ban" video.

  1. I agree. It should not require a religious book to understand that ending a human life is a bad thing.
    2
  2. And this is completely conspiratorial and delusional.
    1
  3. Outrank bodily autonomy? So what law removes the ability to decide to engage in an activity that may result in pregnancy?
    1
  4.  @daviebananas1735  No, I’m saying you lose your right to bodily autonomy, when you must end a separate human life in order to keep your own bodily autonomy.
    1
  5. Don’t bother including the biblical citation to support your bs claim. Obviously, all those numbers next to every sentence of the Bible is just there for the lulz.
    1
  6. Yeah... if only there was a medical building filled with medical staff for life-threatening emergencies, and only if they had unique access to medical procedures... oh wait, that’s called a hospital.
    1
  7.  @honeychurchgipsy6  So I’m ignorant for not learning about your imaginary concern; a concern based on the example in Ireland, where abortions are legal?... That’s delusional.
    1
  8.  @kathypirok-klein3413  The horror stories going on in Texas... in all 48 hours since Roe was overturned?...
    1
  9.  @kathypirok-klein3413  So I guess according to you, Roe didn’t exist back in May.
    1
  10.  @kathypirok-klein3413  Ok... Well regardless of timeline, until Roe was overturned a mere few days ago, any law signed in Texas would not be legal precedent while Roe still existed. While you may claim this was a coordinated effort months ago, legally it’s been a few days. Now please stop making up nonsense, it’s causing you to go on delusional fear induced rants.
    1
  11.  @kathypirok-klein3413  What research do I need to do? Roe protected abortions at the federal level, which supersedes any State law. Do you not understand how our government works?
    1
  12. Or... you could just not get her pregnant and then she won’t have to end a human life due to the inconvenience of parenthood.
    1
  13. So you want a one party government?... because that’s gone so well throughout history. Smh.
    1
  14. What? Don’t like that they have one of the largest percentages of black people out of the 50 states?
    1
  15. If it were the 1850’s, Democrats would be yelling about wanting to keep their slaves. Now, Democrats are yelling about wanting to be able to kill their off spring.
    1
  16. If you’re pro choice, you’re not going to support an exception for rape. You want it available to anyone for all reasons. So stop arguing with sexual assault and medical emergencies, when it’s not the only thing you want.
    1
  17. Yes. Democrats built abortion clinics in black neighborhoods. Now you want to build them on tribal lands. Democrats just keep demonstrating their racism, don’t they?
    1
  18. Would you support a law that only allows abortion for sexual assault victims, or do you want abortions to be available for all people for all reasons? If the latter, your argument about sexual assault is bs.
    1
  19. That’s really sweet of you to help end the life of your grandchild due to the inconvenience of parenthood.
    1
  20.  @AngelaShawWestoven  So if I end the life of my neighbor, that’s none of your or the government’s business? Just curious as to where in the human life cycle do you think ending a human life becomes the government’s business?
    1
  21. “The Supreme Court began hearing cases for the term on October 4, 2021. The court's yearly term begins on the first Monday in October and lasts until the first Monday in October the following year. The court generally releases the majority of its decisions in mid-June.” -Ballotpedia A basic google search would’ve shown you that your idea solely stems from your tribal and delusional imagination.
    1
  22. Nope
    1
  23. So not ending a human life, doesn’t qualify as a human right? Interesting.
    1
  24.  @seanfl33  At least you accomplished your virtue signaling by commenting about reporting them.
    1
  25. Would you support a bill that only allows abortions for sexual assault victims, or do you want abortions to be available to everyone for any reason? If the latter, don’t bother getting the opinion of a rape victim.
    1
  26. Ending a human life, doesn’t sound very “pro-life”... Also, wouldn’t it be pro-choice and pro-second-choice. As the first choice made is to engage in an activity that may result in pregnancy. And the second choice is deciding to end a human life due to the inconvenience of parenthood.
    1
  27.  @markjamie4002  “forced to breed against their will”... but they are not forced. They are consensually engaging in reproductive activities. Do you think women magically become pregnant just walking down the street? And regardless of your opinion, it’s a scientific fact they are ending a human life.
    1
  28.  @markjamie4002  Would you support a law that only allowed abortions for sexual assault victims and medical emergencies? Or do you want them available for everyone for all reasons? If the latter, stop hiding behind your 12 year old girl and father argument. Because that’s not what you want to prevent. And no, there is no “forced breeding” if they consensually engaged in reproductive activity. Do you not understand how pregnancy occurs? Do you need a biology or health class? At what point in a human’s life cycle, from conception to death, is it no longer acceptable to end their life due to the inconvenience of parenthood?
    1
  29.  @markjamie4002  So where in the human life cycle, from conception to death, do you feel that it’s unreasonable to end a human life due to the inconvenience of parenthood?
    1
  30.  @mehdihatami3391  If a clump of cells were found on Mars, you’d say there is life outside of earth. But when that clump of cells, which has its own unique DNA that’s distinctly human, it’s not human life?... You need to go back to science class buddy.
    1
  31.  @markjamie4002  So you’re perfectly content with someone ending the life two days before it’s due, simply out of the inconvenience of parenthood? And what about two days after it’s born? Do four days really make a difference? In your hypothetical situation, did the father choose to engage in a activity that may result in the failure of their child’s kidney? This is why your example doesn’t work. Being pro-choice, is actually being pro-second-choice
    1
  32.  @mehdihatami3391  Will a two day old newborn survive outside the womb entirely on its own without dependence of another body? Is it ok to end the life of a two day old, because it can’t survive on its own? Clearly you didn’t think this all the way through. Good job failing to “debunk” anything.
    1
  33.  @markjamie4002  “Once the child is born and doesn’t require the mother’s body to survive, it has its own bodily autonomy, and all the rights it entails.” You do realize a one week old newborn cannot survive on its own, correct? Children need their parents bodies to provide for them, for many years. So according to you, a newborn doesn’t have rights and can have its life ended, because it still requires its mother’s body? And I’m not asking about blame with the father. I’m asking about their responsibility in the action that caused the kidney failure. You do know what responsibility for your actions are, right?
    1
  34.  @markjamie4002  Oh wow. A newborn can go to a store, purchase baby formula, heat water, measure the formula, mix it and serve themselves? Or do they require another human to use their body is one form or another, to nurture and care for them? A newborn cannot survive on its own. That’s basic common knowledge that you’re blatantly ignoring for the sake of your argument. And yes, the father should be detained and have their kidneys removed if they consensually engage in an activity that is specifically known for irreparable kidney damage. Then again, willfully engaging in something specifically known for kidney damage in other people, is a crime on its own. There... have I sufficiently answered the questions to your idiotic straw man argument? Anymore logical fallacies you’d like to toss around?
    1
  35.  @markjamie4002  Oh? So foster parents are related to the child they care for? You even admit that I’m correct and a newborn cannot survive on its own, and they must be cared for. Yet, you’re marking a petty argument about the definition of a “parent”. And I will answer your dumbass hypothetical question, that ignores the actual topic at hand, and instead falsely distorts the main topic, aka a straw man argument. If the father does not willingly consent to an activity that may result in irreparable kidney damage, then they can keep their bodily autonomy. Just like I believe if a woman does not consent to reproductive activities (sex), they can also keep their bodily autonomy.
    1
  36. Woman? Why does the difference of sex (male/female) vs gender (man/woman) presented in discussions about trans rights, suddenly disappear when the left talks about abortion?
    1
  37. Wow. Look at that. All it took was eliminating the ability to end a human life due to the inconvenience of parenthood, and you’re already figuring out that it can also be avoided by not engaging in reproductive activities.
    1
  38.  @Ezees23  So an embryo isn’t biological life, and doesn’t contain its own unique DNA that’s distinctly human? It’s human life buddy... go back to science class.
    1
  39. It’s really quite sad that you’re too ignorant and tribal to actually realize Roe wasn’t even about women’s rights... “Roe isn’t really about the woman’s choice, is it? It’s about the doctor’s freedom to practice…it wasn’t woman-centered, it was physician-centered.” -Ruth Bader Ginsburg
    1